HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 04; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 04; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 4; 1987-05-20Number Date
·cITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 4
City Council Resolution No. 9122
Dated June 16, 1987
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2659
Dated May 20, 1987
AMENDMENTS
Reso. No. Subject(s)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANACENENT PROCRAN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 4
Plan Sponsor:
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 438-5621
Preparer:
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
May 20, 1987
I.
II.
III.
IV.
v.
VI.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Buildout Projections ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Phasing •.•...•. • .....•.•..••••••••••.•.••••.••••
Zone Requirements for Public Facilities
and Services •.••.••...•......•....••...... . . . . .
Analysis of Public facilities and Improvements
1 •
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
City Administrative Facilities •••••••••••••
Adequacy findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Library .••..•••..•..••.••.••••••.......•.•.
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Wastewater Treatment Capacity ••• , •••
Adequacy Findings ••••••••••••••
....... .......
Parks ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Drainage •••••••••.•.•••.•.•..••••...•...•••
Adequacy findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Circulation ••••••••••••••• . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy findings •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
F 1 re ..•.••...•.............................
Adequacy Findings ••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . .
Open Space •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Schools ................................... •
Adequacy Findings •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sewer Collection System ••••••••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Water Distribution System ••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page No.
1
9
15
23
27
29
36
38
44
47
52
53
60
62
66
67
71
74
77
78
81
82
86
88
93
96
100
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paoe No.
VII. Appendices
Appendix 1. -Glossary........................ 104
Appendix 2. -Growth Management Ordinance..... 110
Appendix 3. -Sources......................... 133
Appendix 4. -Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2659............ 135
-City Council
Resolution No. 9122............ 139
11
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
Local Facilities Management Plan Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Public Facilities Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 4 ••.••••••••••
General Plan -Land Use Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Zoning Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Existing Land Use Categories, Exhibit A •••••••••••••••••
Approved Development Projects by
Land Use Categories, Exhibit B •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approved Development Projects, Exhibit C ••••••••••••••••
Vacant Land Use Categories, Exhibit D •••••••••••••••••••
Buildout Population Projections •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Residential Phasing •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
City Administrative Facilities
Library
Map ............................................ .
Summary Sheet ••••.•.....•.••••.••••....••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
Five-Year CIP ••.•........•....••••.••..........
Dwelling Unit and Population Projections,
Exhibit E .•..••............................•
City Administrative Facilities, Exhibit F ••••••
Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhibit G ••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
Planning Projections, Exhibit H ••••••••••••••••
Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhibit I ••••••••••••
111
Page No.
2
5
12
13
14
18
19
20
21
22
25
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
39
40
41
43
46
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
{Continued)
Wastewater Treatment
Parks
Drainage
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Phasing •••..••.•.•••..•.•••.••••...•••.•••••..
Park District Boundary Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Map ••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Park Demand, Park District 3, Exhibit J •••••••
Park Demand, Zone 4, Park District 3,
Exhibit K ••••••••.••••.••.••.•••••••••...••
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Circulation
Fire
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Buildout Improvements, Table 1 ••••••••••••••••
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••
Open Space
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••• ~ •••
iv
Page No.
48
49
50
51
54
55
56
57
58
59
63
64
65
68
69
70
73
75
76
77
79
80
81
Schools
CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
School District Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
Sewer Collection System
Sewer District Boundary Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
Sewer Demand, Exhibit L ••••••••••••••••••••••••
Water Distribution System
Water Service Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••
Appendices
Bridge and Thoroughfare District •••••••••••••••
Traff le Impact Fee •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
V
Page No.
83
84
85
86
89
90
91
92
95
97
98
99
100
108
109
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ZONE.4:
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
2
t
Cllpel~ -----..... -
-JANUARY 1887
EXECUTIVE SUNNA■Y
The local Facilities Management Pl~n for Zone 4 was
prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Title
21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents
of the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110
of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 4 plan is
consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Imp~ovements Plan,
and it implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986.
The Zone 4 plan begins with the assumptions used to
generate the buildout projections for residential and non-
residential development within the Zone. The plan then phases or
estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until
buildout. The phasing is done to predict future facility
demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is then
analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and
proposed facilities,· a phasing schedule that establishes the
timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand,
and a financing plan that establishes various methods of funding
facilities and improvements that are identified by the plan as
needed. Since this Zone plan ls a regulatory document, each
facility section also contains conditions to ensure that public
facilities will conform ·to the adopted performance standards.
The conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 4 approval,
and mandatory compliance will regulate -future development within
the zone.
The purpose of the summary chart shown below ls to provide
a brief synopsis of the local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
4.
City Ad ■lnlstratlve
Library
Waste Water
Treat ■ent Capacity
SUNNARY CHART
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard until the year
2005.
Library space is currently below
standard. Until this is brought
into conformance, no residential
development may occur in Zone 4 or
the City.
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard to buildout of
Zone 4.
3
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Syste ■
Water Distribution
Park District 3 does not conform
with the adopted peformance standard.
Until this facility ls brought into
conformance, no residential develop-
ment may occur in this quadrant.
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard to buildout of
Zone 4.
The existing road segments and
intersections in Zone 4 currently
meet the adopted performance stan-
dard.
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard to buildout of
Zone 4.
Existing open space meets the adop-
ted performance standard to buildout
of Zone 4.
Existing school facilities currently
have the capacity to meet the
the demand generated by Zone 4.
The School District has indicated
that it will be able to provide
capacity to buildout of Zone 4.
Existing sewer
comply with the
standard to the
Zone 4.
collection networks
adopted performance
ultimate buildout of
Water service to Zone 4 meets the
adopted performance standard to the
buildout of the Zone.
4
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET
Conformance with Adopted Standard
Cit):'.:wide Quadrant Zone 4
1) City Administrative Facilities Until 2005 NIA N/A
2) Library No* Presently below standard
3) Waste Water Treatment Capacity Yes With Phase IV expansion
4) Parks NIA No No**
To Bulldout
5) Drainage N/A NIA Yes
To Bulldout
6) Circulation N/A NIA Yes
To Bulldout
7) Fire NIA NIA Yes
To Bulldout
8) Open Space NIA NIA Yes
To Buildout
9) Schools NIA NIA Yes
To Bulldout
10) Sewer Collection System NIA NIA YES
To Bulldout
11) Water Distribution System NIA NIA YES
N/A = Not Applicable
* No residential development may occur in the City until the Library
shortage is rectified. Staff is recommending that construction of a
Southern Library be added to the Capital Improvement Program Budget.
** No residential development may occur in the Southwest Quadrant until the
park short-age is rectified. See Pages 60 and 61 for alternative
solutions.
5
1 •
GENERAL CONDITIONS
All development within Zone
provisions of Section 21.90 of
and to the provisions and
Facilities Management Plan.
4 shall conform to the
the Carlsbad Municipal Code
conditions of this Local
2. All development within Zone 4 shall be required to pay a
public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the
City Council on April 22, 1986, and all other applicable
fees. Development in Zone 4 shall also be responsible for
any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that
are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the
adopted performance standard.
3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 4
pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 4 shall be in conformance with the
adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted
by City Council Resolution 8797.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 4 Local Facilities Management
Plan is anticipa~ed to incorporate newly acquir~d data, to
add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through
the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may
be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City
Council at anytime.
6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in
conformance with an adopted performance standard during the
yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be
immediately brought before the City Council. If the City
Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no
future building or development permits, which would impact
the facility, shall be issued until those facilities are
brought into conformance with the adopted performance
standard.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 4
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to
development in Zone 4 and must be complied with in addition to
the General Conditions for Zone 4. These conditions are also
listed separately under the analysis discussion of each
facility.
City Ad ■inistrative Facilities
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
6
Library
No residential building or development permits shall be
issued in Zone 4 including those projects previously exempt under
Section 21.90.030(c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code until the
City Council takes action approving measures which provide for
library services to meet the adopted performance standards.
Wastewater Treat ■ent Capacity
The conformance of waste water treatment capacity assumes
the Phase IV expansion of Encina WPCF.
Without any expansion of Enclna's treatment capacity the
facility would not meet the performance standard of treatment
capacity for at least five years. Therefore, pursuant to Section
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, should the Phase IV
expansion be delayed for any reason, the analysis of the facility
must be reassessed. Should the facility fall to comply with the
adopted performance standard then an alternative measure would
need to take place or all development would be stopped in Zone 4
and within the Carlsbad sewer service area.
Parks
No residential building or development permits shall be
issued in Zone 4 or the Southwest Quadrant including those
projects previously exempt under Section 21.90.030(c) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code until the City Council takes action
approving measures which provide park facilities to meet the
adopted performance standard.
Drainage
Drainage facilities shall be provided at the time of
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Circulation
All future development within Zone 4 shall continue to pay
Traffic Impact Fees, Public Facilities Fees and participate in
the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District.
Fire
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Open Space
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
7
Schools
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Sewer Collection Syste ■
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Water Dlstrlbatlo• Syste■
All development within Zone 4 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
8
9
INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Local Facility Management Plan ls to
complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management Plan
for Zone 4 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the Growth
Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan based upon a phased bulldout of the City's
existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities
analysis, the City has been separated into 25 Local Facilities
Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan
Boundaries", on Page 2.
PLAN OVERVIEW
This plan for Zone 4 provides a detailed description and
analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its
current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and
when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order
to accommodate development within the Zone (phasing). It also
provides a complete description of how each facility and
impr~vement will be financed-when mitigation is necessary.
The body of ~he plan is divided into separate sections for
each public facility. In each section there will be a summary
sheet which highlights the important information described in the
analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories:
Existing, Existing plus approved, and Future. The demand column
in each of these categories will show two numbers:
Demand
The top number (1) represents the Citywide, Quadrant or
Zone demand, depending upon the public facility being evaluated.
The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the
public facility evaluated on a Citywide or quadrant basis.
Following the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis
and additional information for each public facility. The sub-
section, "Adequacy Findings", will summarize whether or not the
public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard.
If a facility ls not conforming with the adopted performance
standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a
mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion.
10
ZONE --OVERVIEW
The plan for
Citywide· Facilities
adopted performance
development occurs.
Zone 4 is consistent with all aspects of the
and Improvement Plan and ensures that the
standards shall be complied with as
Local Facilities Management Zone 4 is located in the
City's southwest quadrant and is generally bounded by Interstate
5 on the west and undeveloped land -to the east. The subject area
is divided north and south by Paseo del Norte and east and west
by Poinsettia Lane. Zone 4 consists of 500.7 acres of land which
slopes moderately upward to the east from I-5. An open space
corridor runs through the length of the Zone or, at times, runs
immediately adjacent to the Zone. Zone 4 ls almost completely
built out with residential development which ranges from single-
family, R-1-7500 square foot lots, to sixplexes. The area
includes a new City fire station and also an undeveloped 5.12
acre commercial site.
The Map, "General Plan Land Use", shown on Page 13,
denotes the General Plan Land Use for Zone 4. The accompanying
Land Use Zoning is shown on the, "Zoning" map, on Page 14.
11
18
ZONE.-4; JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
12
Generali Plan-Land Use
ZONE 4
ZONES
l ,-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·;·~ ! ·,._. . di!
I I
! ~M ! I ........, I
i i .. -
..
I
I
I
; j ,.,_..
• I I
; RMH j
I !
I I .
,..
I
I .:
RM
RM
.
I i I .
I . I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
13
·--·~
I i i I ZONE 20
I ; ,-,-..
LEGEND
MIIDINTIAL
Ill. LOW Ol!NSITY (0-I. 5J
111M 109-MIDruM OINSITYI0--1) 11M MIDIUM OINSln' ( 4•8)
-MIOIIJM HIGH Ol!NSITY (8-1') Ill HIGH l>IN.fflY (It-J9)
COMMIICIAL
11111 ~VI UGIONAL llUAIL
US DffNIIVI UGIONAL UTAU.
U UGIONAI.SIIYICB
C COMMUNITYCOMMIM:IAL N NIIGffllOIIIIOOO COMMUCIAL
OS OPIN5PACI
ND NON IIIIIDIHTIAI. USIIIVI
t
Cit, IIC••-a, .. ..,.._.,.,,..,_
-JANUARY 1187'
ZONE !I
ZONE 4
ZONE 5
Zoning
l. ,(·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·i
I '•-• • • I
I PC •
i ~ ! i ~~ : ..
i .J
..
I
I
I
I
I
! • i ..
I .. I
I
!
!
I ..
I
I ~
c-2
PC
I
I
PC
.. , ..
ROM
..... ...,
I ;
~ ! ZONUJ
I ; ,..
I ... .. , .. r-r
.' I ..
! I ,-.
I .
LEGEND
IIIIDINTIAL
P.C PI.ANNIDCOMMUNmZl-■•4 Rl!SIDINTIAL AGIIK.1JL'rulW. ZONI ■·I ■IJIW. USIDe<TIAl ISTATI! ZON1 ■-I ONl·MMILY USIDINTW. ZON1 ■· l 1'fl>MMU.Y -01!N114L ZON1 ■· l NI ,.11,u MMILY llESIO!NlW. 7.cJNI!
I
■-51. IJMIT!D MULTI·FAMllY IU!SIDINTW. ZON1 ID-M ■alD.DrTW.DINSlll'-Nl.11.Tlft! ZON1 IID-H IUID!lmAI.DIMITY-HIGH ZONI!
-USIIJlloln.\L-LIHOMIMUZCINII . I·~ USIIIIN'llAL PIIUfUSIONAL ZONI llf IIIIIDIHTIM. 101J11sr Z0N1 .., IU!SIDmmALWA,._IOHI
C:OJUIIIICIAL O OMCaZONI
C. I NIJGHIOtUIOOD COMMIICIAL ZON1!
C.J -COMN-ZONI
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
14
15
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PROJECTIONS
To properly assess and plan for public facilities and
services in Zone 4, it is necessary to project the level of
development that can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of
this Zone. Buildout projections are used to determine existing
residential and non-residential land uses and to assess the
ultimate potential that may be reached at the time Zone 4 is
built out. The ultimate buildout of Zone 4 has been determined
by examining:
1. The amount of existing land use,
2. The amount of approved, yet undeveloped land uses, and
3. The vacant land which can still be developed. The methodology
used to compile the buildout projections is consistent with
that used in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and
assumptions are described below:
A.
B.
Existing Land Uses
Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the
acreage of each land use category within Zone 4. Field
checks and subsequent research ascertained how each
parcel was actually being utilized as well as the square
footage of existing commercial/industrial structures.
The following Exhibits detail this information:
Exhibit A, "Existing Land Use Categories", Page 18.
Approved But Undeveloped Land
Exhibit B, "Approved Development Projects By Land Use
Category", on Page 19 includes land uses which have
approved projects but which have not been developed as
of January 1, 1987. Buildout is constrained by approved
projects because the land has been committed to a
particular use or density, even though it ls presently
vacant. Approved projects are those ~hich have received
discretionary approval by the Planning Commission and/or
City Council.
C. Vacant Land
All vacant land was inventoried by land use type to
determine ultimate bulldout of the zone. The Citywide
plan directed all environmentally constrained land to be
subtracted from the gross acreage figure for vacant
land. Zone 4 is in an infill area, however, and the
remaining vacant land has very minimal environmental
constraints.
16
There are currently 2,448 existing residential units in
Zone 4. An additional 581 units have been approved for
development and may pull building permits prior to the Local Plan
being adopted. After the adoption of this Plan by the City
Council, no building permits or development permits will be
allowed unless the adopted performance standards are complied
with. This includes all projects which were exempt under Section
21.90.030(c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Zone 4 exceeds the growth control yield by 696 units.
This has occurred because existing development was approved at a
time when higher density levels were permitted. Residential
density in Zone 4 will be balanced out by reduced development in
Zones 9, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, in the southwest quadrant.
Growth in the southwest quadrant will be consistent with the
Carlsbad Municipal Code as amended pursuant to the approval of
Proposition Eon November 4, 1986. Therefore, growth will be in
conformance with the residential quadrant cap. The additional
finding can be made that there are facilities to service the
demand created by Zone 4, as well as capacity in the quadrant to
allow the residential unit total to exceed the growth control
yield.
17
EXHIBIT A
ZONE 11,
EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category within
Zone 4.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
Rl low Density (0-1.5)
RLM low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 .Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC p
G u
NRR
OS
RR
FW
MAJ
MIN
COL
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
Railroad
Freeway
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
18
DWELLING
UNITS
302
2727
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
ACRES
86
342
ACRES
5.1
67.6
EXHIBIT B
ZONE 4
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the number of units or acreage of each land use category
with approved, but unbuilt, projects within Zone 4.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMt-ERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
DWELLING
UNITS
581
ACRES
* See Exhibit C for a further breakdown of specific projects.
19
EXHIBIT C
ZONE_,
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PR03ECTS
Listed below are development projects located in Zone 4.
City File Project Dwelling
Number Name Units Acres
CT 82-24. Seagate Village 288 35.4
CT 73-24/SP-175 Alta Mira 198 29.6
CT 73-24/SP-175 Alta Mira 280 22.6
CT 73-24/SP-175 Alta Mira 128 21.5
CT 73-24/SP-175 Alta Mira 140 16.1
CT 82-29 /PUD-61 Harbor Pointe (Warmington) 381 56.7
CT 81-30 Pacesetter, Seacrest 260 27 .9
PCD-66 Seascape 208 21.6
CT 83-2 Standard Paci f le
(las Playas) 392 51.7
CT 83-2 Standard Pacific
(Vista Pacifica) 192 34.6
CT 73-39 Spinnaker Hills 302 83.0
CT 74-24 Occidental (Plaza Builders) 260 27.6
20
EXHIBIT D
ZONE 4
VACANT LAND USE CATEGORIES
As of January 1, 1987, the following types and anounts of land use are vacant
and not in the development process.
GENERAL PLAN
LANO USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
Single Family
Duplex
RM Medium Density (4-8}
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23}
COMtERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
Itl>USTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
RR
FW
MAJ
MIN
COL
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
Railroad
Freeway
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
GROSS
VACANT
··ACRES
5.1
21
NET
VACANT
ACRES
2.1
BUILDOUT PROJECTION
Residential
The
Management
generation
existing,
breakdown,
residential buildout population projection for
Zone 4 was determined by applying a population
rate of 2.471 persons per dwelling unit to the
approved and potential future units. The population
therefore, is as follows:
Units Rate
Existing 2,448 X 2.471 =
Approved 581 X II =
Future 0 X n =
Total 3,029 X II =
The buildout population projections
throughout this plan for the purpose of
public facilities and improvements.
Non-Residential
Population
6,049
1,436
0
7,484
are used consistently
predicting demand for
The non-re.sidential buildout projection for Management
Zone 4 was determined by totalling the existing, approved and
potential future square footage by use category. Building
permit files were researched to determine the existing and
approved square footage. Vacant land square footage was
calculated by multiplying the gross vacant acres (found on
Exhibit D Vacant Land Use Categories) by 401 and then
converting the results to square footage. The non-residential
buildout breakdown, therefore is as follows:
Existing
Approved
Future
Non-Residential Buildout Projection
22
Square Footage
89,211
89,211
23
PHASING
III. PHASING -AN OVERVIEW
It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule of
development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the
25 local Facility Management Zones for the purpose of:
1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a
yearly basis; and
2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a
public facility is needed; and
3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital
Improvement Program budget.
In the Citywide Plan, phasing of residential development
was 1,250 dwelling units per year. These projections were based
on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital
Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems,
Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
In each local Plan a key element will be the projected
phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These
schedules are presented for the purpose of establishing
thresholds for demand and future demands for public facilities.
By projecting these future public facility and improvement
demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital
Improvement Budget to assure they are in place as development
occurs. The phasing schedule is not presented to establish a
rate of growth within the City. It will be used to assure that
growth occurs only as public facilities are available to ensure
compliance with the adopted performance standards.
The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan is
provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were
discussed above. These projections have been established by
reviewing development in the pipeline which has tentative and
final maps as well as applications pending. The same type of
phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series VII for the entire
City and will be utilized to review phasing projections presented
in this and other local plans to determine the overall impact on
public facilities and services.
Zone 4 -Phasing Schedule
Phasing for Zone 4 in·corporates the Citywide projections
as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized
circumstances include:
1. The amount and type of developing projects:
-Final Maps
-Tentative Maps
-Applications Pending
24
2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential.
3. The amount of development that can be reasonably
absorbed into the market.
The specific residential phasing schedule for Zone 4 is
shown below. The schedule assumes the zone will be completely
built out by the end of 1990. The schedule phases those projects
identified in the developing process beginning in 1987 through
1990. During this time period it is estimated that a total of
581 additional residential units will be built in Zone 4.
Year
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
RESIDENTIAL PHASINC
Zone 4
Yearly
Dwelling
Increase
230
115
115
121
Total
Dwelling
Units
2,448
2,678
2,793
2,908
3,029
In Zone 4 the non-residential land uses will be phased
based upon previous growth trends, location of parcels, and
current applications being considered by the Planning
Department.
In all, a total of 3,029 residential dwelling units will
exist at the buildout of Zone 4. This residential total,
although above the growth control point, ls in compliance with
the Carlsbad Municipal Code as modified by the passage of
Proposition E on November 4, 1986 because adequate public
facilities can be provided. Although this zone exceeds the
growth control point, future development in Zone 4 will be
balanced by reduced development in the other zones within the
southwest quadrant (Zones 9 and 19 through 23). The actual
amount of reduced development per zone cannot be determined until
all the local plans for the quadrant are submitted •.
The total vacant non-residential land use is shown on
Exhibit C, "Vacant Land Use Categories" on Page 20. There ls one
remaining non-residential lot in Zone 4. This ls a 5.12 acre
commercial lot which currently has no specific plan for
development. Because there is only one non-residential lot
remaining in the zone, no non-residential phasing schedule ls
provided in this plan.
25
Phasing Summary
It is estimated that the remaining residential units in
Zone 4 will develop by 1990. Yearly residential growth is
expected to range from a high of 230 units in 1987 to a low of
115 units in 1989 and 1990. Non-residential development of Zone
4 is limited to one 5.12 acre commercial lot.
The specific phasing of Zone 4, is presented for the
purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for
public facilities. It is impossible to predict the exact way
development will occur in this z9ne of the City, but through
these phasing projections the City will be able to establish a
direct link between development and the need for public
facilities. This link will allow the City to ensure compliance
with the adopted performance standards at all times as growth
occurs. And if compliance is not maintained, development will be
stopped until it conforms with the adopted performance
standards.
26
27
ZONE
REQUIREMENTS
IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
The Management Plan for Zone 4 addresses eleven separate
facilities:
1. City Administrative Facilities
2. Library
3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity
4. Parks
5. Drainage
6. Circulation
7. Fire
8. Open Space
9. Schools
10. Sewer Collection System
11. Water Distribution System
Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine
conformance with the adopted performance standard. The
evaluation will be made in three stages based on existing demand,
approved or committed demand, and future demand at buildout.
For each of these facilities and services the following is
provided:
1. An illustrative map showing what is existing and what
will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate
bulldout;
2. District boundary maps where facilities are provided
by special districts (le., school, water, sewer).
3. Adopted service level performance standards which
must be complied with at all times as growth occurs;
and
4. A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis
for each of the public facilities and services.
5. A list of special conditions for each facility to
ensure conformance with the adopted performance
standard.
6. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing
mechanisms relevant to each facility.
The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative
Facilities, Library, and Waste Water Treatment, have been
analyzed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These
will also be included in the Local Facility Management Plan to
show compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance
with the adopted standard.
28
29
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
FACILITIES
ZONE 4
LOCAL
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
t
• CITY ADMINl8TRATION•l>Cl8TINCI
Q CITY AIIMINl8TRA TION-1'1..AHNID
-_.--,---
---.. ,t I
0 LIVE NH. IN
I I ,
I to
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
30
CHyOfC-
Gtowttl MaN,oeme,w Proa,MI
-JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION
EXISTING
APPROVED
CJ z -"' c(
l:
~
FUTURE
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
SUMMARY SHEET
DEMAND SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Caluiuwm . w181andard)
86,539
106,084 YES
9,074
118,867*
168,084 YES
2,153
202,371
168,084 YES***
11,227
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
---
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
---
* As of January 1, 1987, development generating 32,328 square feet of
new demand has been approved but not yet constructed.
** In the year 2005 this facility will no longer conform to the adopted
performance standard.
*** Zone 4 ls scheduled to phase out all of its residential land by 1989.
31
I
CITY ADNINISTRATIYE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled
for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this
not the performance standard
Zone 4 complies with the
Administrative Facilities.
analysis is to determine whether or
is being met, and if the demand for
overall Citywide analysis of City
A. Inventory
1 • Buildout Assumptions:
Current (Citywide/Zone)
Buildout (Citywide/Zone)
Population
57,495/6,049
134,914/7,484
2. Existing City Administrative Facilities:
City Hall Facilities
City Hall
Finance Dept. Modular
Purchasing/Personnel
Dept. Modular
Leased Space
Redevelopment
Community Development Dept.
Las Palmas Facility
SQUARE FEET
Square Footage Temporary
Permanent Space Space
12,899
2,700
1,800
Public Safety and Service Center
Phase I
Police and Fire Depts.
Vehicle Maintenance
Totals
Total Existing Facilities
* Year-to-Year Option
53,700
10,358
76,957
32
4,500
Required
Square Footage
86,539/9,074
202,371/11,227
Lease
Leased Expi~ation
Space Date
2,000
22,627
24,627
106,084
3/31/83*
7/31/90
As indicated on the table on the previous page,
approximately 231 of existing administrative facilities are
leased and 4.21 are temporary (portable modular units). If the
rental leases are terminated or the modulars are no longer used,
the existing square footage of City Administrative Facilities
will be reduced. At that time, the Management Plan for Zone 4,
as well as the Citywide Plan, will need to be amended to modify
the phasing assumptions in order to plan for more City
Administrative Facilities at an earlier time.
3. facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements
Program:
Item Sq. Ft. Year Amount Source
a. Public Safety Center
Phase II*
Design
Construction
86-87
62,000 89-90
$ 255,000 Pff**
$3,455,000 PFF/S/W**
b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program.
62,000 square feet
*
**
Public Safety Center Phase II. Yard offices,
Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for
the use of Utility Maintenance, Parks &
Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and
Purchasing. Approximate size is 62,000 square
feet. This includes a two-story yard office and
Purchasing warehouse with a 6,400 square foot
mezzanine.
PFF -Public Facilities Fee
S -Sewer
W -Water Enterprise
33
From these population projections a demand for City
Administrative Facilities has been assessed. The specific
phasing for Zone 4 is being projected based on the number of
projects which have received final approvals. The exact timing
of these specific projects may vary, however, the timing of
necessary public facility improvements would also vary
accordingly. This will assure that the adopted performance
standards will be met as development occurs. It should be noted
that there is no more available residential land to be developed
in Zone 4. Exhibit E is provided as a projection of growth
throughout the City of Carlsbad on a yearly basis.
YEAR
EXHIBIT E
P L A 1' 1' I 1' G P R O J B C 'l' I O If S O If L Y
-----------------------------------------------DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
EXISTING REMAINING PROJECTED BEGINNING, ENDING
D. U. 'S D. U. 'S GROWTH YEAR YEAR
POP. POP. ~----------------------------------------------------------------
1987 23,348 31,251 1,250 57,693 60,782
1988 24,598 30,001 1,250 60,782 63,870
1989 25,848 28,751 1,250 63,870 66,959
1990 27,098 27,501 1,250 66,959 70,048
1991 28,348 26,251 1,250 70,048 73,137
1992 29,598 25,001 1,250 73,137 76,225
1993 30,848 23,751 1,250 76,225 79,314
1994 32,098 22,501 1,250 79,314 82,403
1995 33,348 21,251 1,250 82,403 85,492
1996 34,598 20,001 1,250 85,492 88,580
1997 35,848 18,751 1,250 88,580 91,669
1998 37,098 17,501 1,250 91,669 94,758
1999 38,348 16,251 1,250 94,758 97,847
2000 39,598 15,001 1,250 97,847 100,935
2001 40,848 13,751 1,250 100,935 104,024
2002 42,098 12,501 1,250 104,024 107,113
2003 43,348 11,251 1,250 107,113 110,202 •
2004 44,598 10,001 1,250 110,202 113', 290
2005 45,848 8,751 1,250 113,290 116,379
2006 47,098 7,501 1,250 116,379 119,468
2007 48,348 6,251 1,250 119,468 122,557
2008 49,598 5,001 1,250 122,557 125,645
2009 50,848 3,751 1,250 125,645 128,734
2010 52,098 2,501 1,250 128,734 131,823
2011 53,348 1,251 1,250 131,823 134,912
2012 54,598 l 1 134,912 134,914
2013 54,599 0
34
B. Phasing
Population projections for the entire City were made
within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan which have
been updated and are shown on Exhibit E. The following exhibit
shows the yearly demand for City Administrative Facilities as
well as the yearly demand created by Zone 4 based on the
projected Citywide phasing.
EXHIBIT f
P LANN I NG_ PRO J E CT I ON S ON LY
--------------------------------------------------CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES PROJECTIONS
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
(1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1 1 000 POPULATION)
YEAR ZONE 4 ZONE 4 CITYWIDE
DEMAND
BEGINNING
01/01/YR
EXISTING CONFORMS/
POP. DEMAND
BEGINNING
01/01/YR
FACILITIES (NON -
CONFORMING) .
--~------------------------------------------------------~-----
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
6,049
6,617
6,902
7,186
7,186
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
7,485
9,074
9,926
10,352
10,779
10,779
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
11,227
86,243
90,876
95,509
100,142
104,775
109,408
114,042
118,675
123,308
127,941
132,574
137,207
141,840
146,473
151,107
155,740
160,373
165,006
169,639
174,272
178,905
183,538
188,172
192,805
197,438
202,071
202,371
106,084
106,084
106,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
19,841
15,208
10,575
67,942
63,309
58,676
54,042
49,409
44,776
40,143
35,510
30,877
26,244
21,611
16,977
12,344
7,711
3,078
(1,555)
(6,188)
(10,821)
(15,454)
(20,088)
(24,721)
(29,354)
(33,987)
(34,287)
These projections were based on a review of the San Diego
Association of Governments (SANDAG) p~ojections along with those
utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public
Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
35
Currently, Zone 4 has 2,448 dwelling units which generates
a 9,074 square footage demand for City Administrative Facilities.
As of January 1, 1987, the existing Citywide demand for City
Administrative Facilities was 86,539 square feet of which the
demand for Zone 4 ls included. Zone 4 has the potential to
create an additional 2,153 square feet of demand.
c. Adequacy Findings
City Administrative Facilities based upon the projected
phasing. of Citywide development and that of Zone 4, will conform
with the adopted standard until the year 2005. The following
Exhibit G, "City Administrative Facilities", on Page 37 shows the
existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand, and
Zone 4's phased demand. Residential development in Zone 4 will
be "phased out" by 1989.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
B. Financing
Public Facilities Fees are continuing to be collected
Citywide and in Zone 4. Future residential development will
create a relatively small demand for City Administrative
Facilities (2,153 sq. ft. of additional demand at buildout)
therefore, it is assumed that the minimal proportionate share
required of this zone will be financed by Public Facilities Fees
paid by future Zone 4 development. In other words no other
financing mechanism will be required as a condition of
development relative to adequate City Administrative Facilities.
36
CITY ADMINSTRATIVE FACILITIES
ZONE 4 COMPARISON
210
200
190
180
170
106,084 106,084 106,084
160
0 150 z
<( 140 ~ w 130 0,........
(/) 120 u.. "O 0 C: 110 0 w I-(/) ...., w :> 100 W 0 u.. ..c: 90 I-w-
Cl'.: 80 <(
:::> 70 0
(/) 60
50
40
30
20 10,779 11,227 11,227 11,227 11,227
10
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013
DEMAND BY YEAR m
)( ::c
' -m --I
G)
38
LIBRARY
ZONE 4
LOCAL
... __ ,,,ii"
ZONE 4
,, ..!-~ --1:9."'--,,,,,
LIBRARY
,-r---
----... ~, J
I I
I I ,o
\ ' ' ', ...... ... ,
' \ I I
Cltyal~
Otowrft ......... Pt~-"
-JANUARY 1187
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
39
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
46,154
EXISTING
4,839
63,396
APPROVED
C, , 149** z -ct)
< J: 107,931
Q.
FUTURE
5,987
LIBRARY
SUNNARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Ccduin ...
wAltandard)
31,500 NO*
31,500 NO*
------
MITIGATION
---
---
FUNDING
---
---
* Until this facility conforms with the adopted performance standard, no
residential development may occur in the City. With existing plus
committed demand, this facility is short 31,896 square feet.
** There is no more available residential land within the Zone to be
developed other than that which has already received final approvals.
40
LIBRARY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be
scheduled for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the performance standard is being met and, if the demand for
Zone 4 is consistent with the overall Citywide analysis of the
Library.
The Library Director has determined that the impacts of
commercial and industrial development on library facilities is
mitigated through the collection of PFF and development of
residential projects only should be stopped if the standard is
not being complied with.
A. Inventory
1. Buildout Assumptions:
Current (Citywide/Zone)
Buildout (Citywide/Zone)
2. Existing Facilities:
Population
57,495/6,049
134,914/7,484
Owned
Sq. Ft.
Leased
Sq. Ft.
Civic Center Library
Adult Learning Center*
La Costa Area Library
Warehouse
Total
24,600
24,600
400
4,500
2,000
6,900
Required
Square Footage
46,154/4,839
107,931/5,987
Lease
Expiration
Date
9/30/87
1/31/89
1/10/88
Total owned and leased space
* Year-To-Year Option
31,500 Sq.Ft.
3. Facilities in the Five Year Capital Improvement
Program:
The adopted Five Year CIP includes $650,000 for the design
of a main library in the southern area of the City. Also,
41
B.
in Appendix A of the CIP. "To be Considered Capital
Projects", the construction of this library is estimated at
$6,900,000 to be funded by the Public Facilities Fee.
4. Other Information:
The City Council on August 26, 1986 approved the final
report entitled, "A Strategic Plan & Space Needs Study of
the City of Carlsbad City Hall & Libraries" which was
prepared by Michael Feerer & Associates. The Council
adopted option #5 of the library portion of the study which
directed staff to initiate a site selection study to be
returned for Council consideration by Jan~ary 1, 1987.
Several sites have been determined to be suitable for a
southern library location. Staff is attempting to negotiate
an agreement for a site at this time.
Phasin9
Population projections for the entire City were prepared on
a yearly basis and are shown in Exhibit E, "Dwelling Unit
and Population Projections" on Page 34. These projections
are based on a review of the· San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized
for the City's Capital Improvements Program and the Public
Facilities Management System, Monitoring Report of April,
1986.
The specific phasing for Zone 4 is being projected based
on the number of projects which have received·approval. There
are no future residential areas to be developed in this Zone.
All residential land is either developed or has ·already received
approval to be developed.
42
EXHIBIT H
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY
LIBRARY FACILITIES
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
(800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION)
YEAR ZONE 4 ZONE 4 CITYWIDE EXISTING
POP. DEMAND DEMAND FACILITIES
CONFORMS/
(NON -
BEGINNING BEGINNING CONFORMING)
01/01/YR 01/01/YR
---------------------------------------------------------------
1987 6,049 4,839 46,154 31,500 (14,654)
1988 6,617 5,294 48,625
1989 6,902 5,521 51,096 CURRENTLY NON -
1990 7,186 5,749 53,567 CONFORMING
1991 7,186 5,749 56,038
1992 7,485 5,988 58,509
1993 7,485 5,988 60,980
1994 7,485 5,988 63,451
1995 7,485 5,988 65,922
1996 7,485 5,988 68,393
1997 7,485 5,988 70,864
1998 7,485 5,988 73,335
1999 7,485 5,988 75,806
2000 7,485 5,988 78,277
2001 7,485 5,988 80,748
2002 7,485 5,988 83,219
2003 7,485 5,988 85,690
2004 7,485 5,988 88,161
2005 7,485 5,988 90,632
2006 7,485 5,988 93, 10'3
2007 7,485 5,988 95,574
2008 7,485 5,988 98,045
2009 7,485 5,988 100,516
2010 7,485 5,988 102,987
2011 7,485 5,988 105,458
2012 7,485 5,988 107,929
2013 7,485 5,988 107,931
Exhibit H shows that as of January 1, 1987 the demand for
Library Facilities in Zone 4 ls 4,839 square feet. The City
currently has 31,500 square feet of library space with an
existing deficiency of 14,654 square feet. With additional
demand generated by approved projects the library shortage will
increase to 31,896 square feet.
43
c. Adequacy Findings
Library space ls currently below standard and there are no
adopted or guaranteed plans to bring this into conformance with
the adopted performance standard. Until it does comply no
residential development may occur in Zone 4 or the City. Exhibit
I, "Zone 4 Demand Comparison", on Page 46 shows graphically the
existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand and
Zone 4's phased demand.
Staff is recommending that the City Council follow
alternative No. 1 under the "Mitigation" section and that the
five year CIP be amended to include funding for new library
facilities in excess of the current shortage. Until this
alternative, or another, ls chosen no residential development may
be allowed in Zone 4 or the City.
III. MITIGATION
There are a number of alternatives which could be
considered to bring the City's library space into conformance
with the adopted standard.
1 • Amend the current five year CIP
new library facilities, which
deleting other projects.
residential development cannot
City.
to include funding for
would could require
Until this is done,
occur in Zone 4 or the
2. Put a measure on the ballot that would raise the
necessary money to fund the building of a new library
facility through the use of General Obligation Bonds.
This would require a 2/3 approval for the bonds and
would mean that no development could occur in the
interim; or
3. Walt until a Local Facilities Management Plan for a zone
other than 1 through 6 resolves the problem and brings
the City's library space into conformance with the
adopted performance standard.
It is recommended that the City approve Alternative No. 1
and amend the CIP to include funding for new library facilities.·
It should be noted that the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan utilized leased library space in assessing
compliance with the adopted performance standard. This space
should be considered temporary and may not always be available
for use by the Library.
44
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
No residential building or development permits shall be
issued in Zone 4 or the City, until the City Council takes action
approving a measure or measures which provide for library
services to meet the adopted performance standards.
a. Financing
The City currently collects a Public Facility F~e (PFF)
which is set at 2.5% of permit valuation. This fee is paid at
the time of building permit issuance. The adopted Capital
Improvement Budget includes $650,000 of PFF funds to design a new
library facility. Other possible funding sources could be:
Issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Certificates of
Participation, General Capital Construction funds, Revenue
Sharing, State or Federal grants.
At the present time there are no funds appropriated for
the construction of additional library space.
45
LIBRARY FACIL·ITIES
ZONE 4 COMPARISON
120
110 107,931
100
90
0 z 80
<(
~ w 70 Q,....._
(/)
LL 1J 0 C: 60 0 r-(/)
a w:::, 50 O'I W 0 LL ..c:
we 40 0:::
<(
:) a 30 (/} 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500
20
10 5,749 5,988 5,988 5,988 5,988
0
-10
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013
m DEMAND BY YEAR X
:!: I!
-I
47
WASTEWATER
ENCINA
WASTEWATER
T·AEATMENT
PLANT
ZONE 4
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
118
, Wastewater
ID
BUILDOUT
LOCAL FA CI LIT IE S MAN AGE MEN T ·PLAN -Zone 4
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
Carlsbad Service Area
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY ( C cnonTWlCtt w/Stl!ndard) · MIT/GA T/ON FUNDING
4.7
EXISTING 5.7 NO SEE PAGE 52A SEE MGO PAGE a
6.6d
8.6b,d YES N/A N/A APPROVED
MGD
C, ---z -(/)
< 7.7c J: a..
FUTURE 8.6c,d YES N/A N/A
MGD ---
a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service area which
includes Zone 4. The following analysis of a Citywide facility,
therefore, focuses on the entire sewer service area, and not just on
Zone 4.
b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Encina.
c. Demand and Supply, as of 1995.
d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991.
49
52A
WASTEWATER TREATNENT CAPACITY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Sewer plant capacity is adequat~ for at least a five year
period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
separate and independent agencies, Leucadia County Water
District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of
Carlsbad.
Sewer service for Zone 4 is provided entirely by the City
of Carlsbad.
1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area):
Wastewater Treatment Demands
Carlsbad
Population
Current Buildout
40,356 95,669
* EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units
EDuit
Curren't'Buildout
21,354 47,800
MG~*
Current Buildout
4.7 11.8
** K;D -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF)
2. Existing Facilities
The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two
treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity is
provided through the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility
(WPCF) which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies.
The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MCD of which
Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD).
The City of Carlsbad also holds. title to the Calavera
Hills Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The
Calavera Facility is not operational at this time and will
require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it
functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant ls estimated
to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina
WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant
ls not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the
absence of needed capacity at Encina.
50
3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital
Improvements Program:
The adopted CIP includes two items which will be financed
from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity:
B.
a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin
in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000
Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 MGD.
b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the
1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to
correspond to capacity needs.
Phasing and Service Demand
Based on data maintained by the City Development
Processing Services Department, on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's
had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 CPD per EDU and
the adopted 3% vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be
issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the
Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on
phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non-
residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion
of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual
growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and
238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would
indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be
exceeded within a year.
Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's
wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow
value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent
dwelling units (EDU's) were connected and being billed by the
City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU 1 s has
been measured at 4.69 MGD. That flow divided by the currently
billed EDU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day
(GPO) per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of
Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate of 246 CPD per EDU. Evaluation
of available capacity varies significantly depending on the value
of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page
52, utilizing 220 GPO per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF
would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be
completed in 1991.
C. Adequacy Findings
Based on analysis of existing flow data and a range of
projections it is likely that current treatment capacity will be
reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim
capacity will be required to meet the performance standard.
Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would
allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet
51
!Y.!
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
V1 1993
N
1994
1995
FLOW PROJECTIONS1
EQUIVALENT DWELLING FLOW a 220
T A B L E 1
CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND
AND
AVAILABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
FLOW al 246
UNITS (EDU 1 S) GAL/EDU (MGD)2 GAL/EDU (MGD) ENCINA CMGD)
21,354 4.69 5.25 5. 71
23,3843 5 .14 5. 75 5. 71
24,492 5.40 6.03 5. 71
25,600 5.63 6.29 5. 71
26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57
27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57
28,924 6.36 7 .12 8.57
30,032 6.60 7.38 8.57
31,140 6.85 7.66 8.57
TREATMENT CAPACITY
LAKE CALAVERA
HILLS CMGO) TOTAL CMGD)
0.0 5. 71
0.6 6.31
0.7 6.41
0.7 6.41
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
o.o 8.57
o.o 8.57
o.o 8.57
1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU 1s are expanded 1,143 per year. This represents 905 dwelling units.and 238 EDU 1s of
commercial and industrial. (428,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year fa projected to
July 1 to correspond to ftacal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy.
2 MGD = Millions of Gallons Per Day
3 1988 EDU 1S • 22,965 EDU 1S issued 3·31·87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy
(22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 • 23,384
performance standard.
the proposed special
Mitigation section.
These alternatives are incorporated into
conditions outlined in the following
III.
A.
8.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 4
1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity
throughout a five (5) year period:
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a
monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and
to have an early warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of
treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide
adequate capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25
MCD, actively seek leased capacity from other
Encina agencies.
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 HGD,
proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills
Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be
activated when more cost effective treatment
measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad
capacity ·at Encina has been reached.
Financing
Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of
funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment
plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities up~rades and the
mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy
of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash
flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction with the
Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a
basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and
each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be
given to wastewater treatment capacity.
52A
53
PARKS
ZONE 4
LOCAL FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN
· 54
PARK DISTRICTS
10
4
t
01, .. _ _ ..._.,.,,..., ...
5
JANUARY 1187
ZONE 4
ZONE 4
t
COMMUNITY PARKS
0 IXISTING
• ,uTURI
* SPICIAL USE ARIA
..
~
0 • V _.---~N------
,,,,, I , ,,,. \ ' ', ... ___
Aca,. ... ,,
\
------,--------,._'4l I
I I I I ID
''-t'o•---~
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
55
PARKS
GECOACH
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION
26.07
EXISTING
18 .15
33.68**
APPROVED
C, 4.31 z -(/'J
< :c 95.33 a.
FUTURE
22.45
PARKS
SUMMARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Calllau•• . w18t■llllrd)
16.0 NO*
16.0 ---
------
MITIGATION
SEE PACE 60
---'
---
FUNDING
! EE
PAGE 60
---
---
I
* Until this shortage is corrected no residential development may occur
in the southwest quadrant.
** The approved demand is contingent upon local.plans being approved in
Zones 6, 9 and 20.
56
PARKS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per
1,000 population within a park district, must be scheduled for
construction within a five-year period.
Special Considerations
The Citywide Plan divides the City into four park
districts whlc~ are the same as the City's four quadrants. Zone
4 ls located entirely within Park District 3 (SW Quadrant).
PARK DISTRICT 3
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of
not the park demand
performance standard.
this analysis ls to determine whether o~
for Zone 4 complies with the adopted
A. Inventory
Existing Facilities:
Community Parks
Alta Mira
Special Use Area
Spinnaker
B. Phasing
1 • Buildout
Park District 3 ·
Zone 4
Ownershie
City
.!.U!.
Passive/Natural
City Passive/Natural
Total Acreage
Ass·umptions ( 1/1/87)
Acreage
12.0
4.0
16.0
Population Reguired Acres
Current 8,690 26.07
Buildout 31,775 95.33
Current 6,049 18.15
Bulldout 7,484 22.45
57
2. Park Demand (Park District 3)
Listed below is the demand for parks generated by
residential development in Park District 3. Demand was
determined by using the following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
Supply ls determined by analyzing existing parks and any
parks scheduled for construction. This is compared with the
demand to determine if the performance standard is being met.
EXHIBIT l
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR THE SOUTHWEST QUARDRANT
PARK ACREAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-SUPPLY
3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE ARE
PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT ----------------------------~-------------------------~-----~-----------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/
UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON -
UNITS CONFORMING)
------------------------------------------~-----------------------------EXISTING 3,517 3,517 8,691 8,691 26.07 26.07 16.00 (10.07)
1987 419 3,936 1,035 9,726 3.11 29.18 16.00 (13.18)
1988 22·3 4,159 551 10,277 1.65 30.83 16.00 (14.83)
1989 321 4,480 793 11,070 2.38 33.21 16.00 (17.21)
1990 500 4,980 1,236 12,306 3.71 36.92 16.00 (20.92)
1991 560 5,480 1,236 13,541 3.71 40.62 16.00 (24.62)
1992 559 6,040 1,384 14,925 4.15 44.77 16.00 (28.77)
1993 491 6,599 1,381 16,306 4.14 48.92 16.00 (32.92)
1994 435 7,090 1,213 17,519 3.64 52.56 16.00 (36.56)
1995 589 7,525 1,075 18,594 3.22 55.78 16.00 (39.78)
58
3. Park Demand (Zone 4 Only)
listed below is the demand for parks generated
specifically by residential development in Zone 4 and not the
entire quadrant. Information must be generated from each zone
before the whole quadrant can be analyzed. Demand for Zone 4 was
reached by using the following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
EXHIBIT K
PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR ZONE 4
PARK ACREAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-SUPPLY
3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE ARE
PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT
------------------------------------------------------------------------PHASING DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/
UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON -·
UNITS CONFORMING)
-------~---------------~------------------------------------------------EXISTING 2,448 2,448 6,049 6,049 18.15 18.15 16.00 (2 .15)
1987 230 2,678 568 6,617 1.70 19.85 16.00 (3.85)
1988 115 2,793 284 6,902 0.85 20.70 16.00 ( 4. 70)
1989 115 2,908 284 7,186 0.85 21.56 16.00 (5.56)
1990 121 3,029 299 7,485 0.90 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
1991 0 3,029 0 7,485 o.oo 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
1992 0 3,029 0 7,485 o.oo 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
1993 0 3,029 0 7,485 o.oo 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
1994 0 3,029 0 7,485 o.oo 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
1995 0 3,029 0 7,485 o.oo 22.45 16.00 (6.45)
59
4. Evaluation of Zone 4 Within Park District 3
Listed below are the demand and supply of existing park
acreage.
Existing
Community Parks
Special Use
Required Acres
Total
Acres
12.0
4.0
16.00
26.07
Shortage (10.07)
Currently, in Park District 3, a shortage of 10.07 acres
exists. As Zone 4 develops to buildout an additional 4.31 acres
will be necessary to meet its park demand.
C. Adequacy Findings
Park District 3 does not conform with the adopted
performance standard. Therels a~rrent shortage of 10.34 acres
and based upon those projects which have already pulled building
permits in the quadrant, the shortage will grow to 16.05 acres.
III. MITIGATION
The current Capital Improvements Program (CIP} contains an
appropriation for $190,000 to design a community park in the
southwest quadrant (Park District 3). The development of this
park was contingent upon City negotiations with the Sammis
Corporation and Hunt Properties, Inc. for the possible
construction of a "turn-key" park. To date, these negotiations
have not resulted in the City obtaining even the land for the
proposed park.
Since Zone 4 ls an infill zone with all remaining
residential development already approved, it ls impossible for
the Zone to provide future developed park land. Given that,
there are several alternatives which could be considered to
resolve the park shortage in Park District 3.
1. The CIP could be
funds to purchase
acreage.
amended to include the necessary
a sui tabl_e park sl te of adequate
2. The City could wait until the other zones in Park
District 3 submit Facilities Plans which would
resolve the shortage. The other zones are largely
undeveloped and have the potential to provide
60
developed park land. Under this alternative no
residential development would be allowed in Park
District 3 until another zone resolved the park
shortage.
Special Considerations
As mentioned in the local Facilities Management Plan for
Zone 3, the future usability of Alta Mira Park should be
addressed in thls Zone plan.
At issue is a determination of what types of park should
be considered developed under the Growth Management Program.
Alta Mira Park was dedicated to the City before the current
standards existed for City parks. Therefore, this park site is
designed as a passive/natural type in the parks inventory and ls
considered as developed. It should be noted that dedication of
Alta Mira Park was consistent with the Park and Recreation
Element and General Plan in effect at that time.
At present, the City plan is to obtain more acreage in
Zone 20, next to the existing Alta Mira park site for the purpose
of constructing an active Community Park.
Currently, the Parks and Recreation Commission is
reviewing the entire City parks inventory, so this issue may be
resolved by the time Zone 4 comes to a public hearing. Although,
staff would like the Planning Commission to consider this issue
and make a recommendation to the City £ouncil as to how to count
developed park acreage.
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
The facility analysis has indicated that the parks
standard within the Southwest Quadrant is not being met.
Therefore, pursuant to Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, no residential development may be allowed in this quadrant
until the performance standard is complied with.
61
62
DRAINAGE
ao•
ZONf 9
ZONE 4
tOal •ox TIIIPL■ ~ DRAINAGE
+---It . • , : I ,lk -~--·~-·~~--·-·-·-\
• •• : I CA'NYON D■ I '•-• '-: • ! ~ i LAI INCINAI
..
I ..
I .
I -!
!
I .. I
I .. I . I
• -......~~ 1 ;
~ : -! ")~~ i
i
I
: I . · .. ._ i : •.; ..
i f • ,········· ,.1 ... .__,·
,,, Iii:.-,,., ........... ,. ..
Deellt• ....•••••
·-.... i i ;
j ZONE 211
i I i
.i
IXIITIMG ITOIIM IIIIAIN8 I JIZI:
OPINCHANNIL
c:::=> CONCIIETI! UNl!O CHANNEL
• CONCIIV't! IOX CULVIIIT
0 IX18Tll!G 0111111$ IAIIN
-■A■IN ■OUNDAIIY ■U■•.■A■IN ■OUNDAIIY
t
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
63
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN:-Zone 4
DRAINAGE
SUMMARY SHEET
BUILDOUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccdau,... wllttndard)_ MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING * * . YES N/A
APPROVED ------YES N/A
C, z -en < :c .
0.
FUTURE ------YES . N/A
* Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual projects are approved
in Zone 4.
64
N/A
N/A
N/A
DRAINAGE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the
City concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other
public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it
is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are
finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which
are larger than those required from a single development project
and, therefore, need to be identified so that t~e proper funding
can be collected for the construction of these facilities.
A. Inventory
The City's Master Drainage Plan, completed in March, 1980,
does not identify the need for major drainage facilities within
Zone 4. However, to accommodate development in this area, a
desiltation basin was previously constructed at the south end of
Zone 4. At the time of the Zone 4 development, the City was
unable to construct, in Zone 19, the drainage facility identified
in the Master Drainage Plan. This other desiltation basin will
need to be constructed as development occurs in Zone 19 and will
be included in the local plan for Zone 19. The Master Drainage
Plan is currently being revised; however, preliminary research
indicates there will be no significant impacts in Zone 4.
1. Existing Facilities
Existing development has constructed the majority of the
drainage facilities required to service Zone 4. Zone 4 drainage
flows in two predominant directions. The northern half of Zone 4
flows north into the Canyon de Las Encinas floodplain while the
southern half of Zone 4 ·flows south into the Batiquitos Lagoon.
A smaller basin along the southwest portion of Zone 4 flows
southwest beneath I-5 and drains into the Batiquitos Lagoon.
2. Buildout Assumptions
Future development within Zone 4 will consist of the
following:
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
65
5.1 Acres
Acres
Acres
3. Facilities in the Five Year Capital Facilities
Program:
There are no improvements scheduled in the current CIP
Budget.
B. Phasing
Since the demand for future drainage facilities within
Zone 4 will be localized and generated by specific development,
it will be addressed as that development occurs.
At present there is no significant drainage impact from
development outside of Zone 4. In the future, as development
occurs in Zones 5, 19, 20 and 21, there may be drainage impacts
upon Zone 4. These out-of-zone impacts will be assessed and
mitigation measures proposed when ~he local plans for these zones
are prepared.
c. Adequacy Findings
Existing facilities conform with the adopted performance
standard.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 4
Drainage facilities shall be provided at the time of
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
a. Financing
Drainage improvements shall be financed by the developer.
66
67
CIRCULATION
ZOh£9
I
• I
I
ZONE 4
CIRCULATION ELEMENT-
z~, ROADS AND INTERS~CTIONS
l ,l·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~ ! ·~·-· ! I I i i i -~ . i. ! ·~ !
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~,.
,;;-
,.
I
I . •.; .
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CllyotC•IMM Gfowlll ~ ,., ... .,.,
-JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
68
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION.
EXISTING *
---APPROVED
C, z -"' C :c
~
FUTURE
**
CIRCULATI~N
SUMMARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY
(Cailal''S..rc.,
* YES
------
** ---
MITIGATION
N/A
---
---
FUNDING
N/A
---
---
* The existing demand includes the 581 approved but not constructed
residential dwelling units in Zone 4. The existing level of service
at each impacted road segment or intersection complies with the
adopted performance standard.
** There is only one remaining 5.12 commercial site left to develop
within Zone 4. It ls projected, this site could develop in the next
two or three years and not reduce the level of service at any
impacted road segments or intersections.
69
I
.,,.
CIRCULATION
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road
segment or intersection out of the zone which ls impacted by
development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service
level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak
hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the
traffic generated by the local Facility Management Zone will use
the road segment or intersection.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis ls to determine whether or
not the circulation system within Zone 4 conforms to the adopted
performance standards for Zone 4. It will also address all
Circulation Element Roads and Intersections outside of Zone 4
impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by
Zone 4 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance
standard.
A. Inventory
The following Circulation Element Roads and Intersections
meet the impacted criteria for Zone 4. See Page 68 for
"Circulation Element Roads and Intersections" that are located
within Zone 4.
Roads
1 • Paseo del Norte
2. Palomar Airport Road west to I-5
3. Poinsettia lane east of I-5 to Zone's eastern
boundary
4. Poinsettia Lane west of I-5 to Carlsbad Boulevard
Intersections
1. Paseo del Norte/Palomar Airport Road
2. Palomar Airport Road/Northbound I-5
3. Palomar Airport Road/Southbound I-5
4. Poinsettia Lane/Northbound I-5
5. Poinsettia Lane/Southbound I-5
6. Poinsettia lane/Avenida Encinas
7. Poinsettia lane/Carlsbad Boulevard
8. Poinsettia Lane/Alga-College
70
B. Phasing
Zone 4 is completely built out with_ the exception of a
5.12 acreage commercial site which is vacant. The 581
residential units which have been approved for development and
may pull building permits will not cause the existing level of
service to change at any of the impacted road segments or
intersections.
The remaining commercial site could be developed in the
next two to three years. Its development would not cause any of
these impacted road segments or intersections to fall below the
adopted performance standard.
c. Adequacy Findings
The existing conditions of these road segments and
intersections all comply with the adopted performance standard.
The following
service for each
intersections.
Paseo del-Norte/
Palomar Airport Road
Palomar Airport Road/
I-5 Northbound
Palomar Airport Road/
I-5 Southbound
Poinsettia lane/
I-5 Northbound
Poinsettia lane/
I-5 Southbound
Poinsettia Lane/
Avenida Encinas
Poinsettia Lane/
Carlsbad Boulevard
Poinsettia Lane/
Alga-College
chart indicates the
of these impacted
existing level of
road segments or
Existing
A.M.
Peak
A
B
A
A
A
A*
A
(Future
P.H.
Peak
B
D
A
A
A
A*
A
Intersection)
* The level of service analysis for this intersection was
determined by staff.
71
These levels of service were obtained from the preliminary
draft report of Barton-Aschman Associates traffic study.
Existing levels of service are based on actual traffic counts at
these intersections.
As discussed in the phasing section, staff believes that
Zone 4 will be able to completely buildout without causing the
level of service at any impacted road segment or intersection to
fall below the adopted performance standard. However, should any
one of these impacted road segments or intersections fall below
the adopted performance standard prior to the remaining 581
residential building permits being pulled, these permits would
not be allowed to be obtained until the road segment or
intersection complied with the standard. This is also true for
the remaining commercial site, although any development plans for
this site would require an adequacy analysis for circulation as
well as all other public facilities.
III. MITIGATION
The facility analysis for circulation indicates that Zone
4 is in compliance with the adopted performance standard.
Therefore, pursuant to Section 21.90.110 (a)(4) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code, no special conditions are required at this time.
Although no mitigation ls necessary, as a result of
impacts from Zone 4, each of the road segments and intersections
will be monitored on an annual basis to assure compliance with
the adopted standards. The City's monitoring system will assure
that those road segments and intersections which appear to be
moving towards a level of service less than the adopted standard
will be assessed before they fall below standard. This
monitoring system will augment the local plans and be used as an
early warning system.
A third level of analysis will occur as individual
projects are considered within a Zone with an approved local
plan, the specific analysis of the project will address
compliance and impacts upon all of the public facilities
including circulation. Should circulation or another public
facility fall below standard, this individual project could not
be approved until the standard was met.
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
In order to partially mitigate the incremental circulation
impacts of future development, all future development within Zone
4 shall continue to pay Traffic Impact Fees, Public Facilities
Fees and participate in the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit
District.
72
B. Financing
The source of funds for the needed future circulation
improvements both in Zone 4 and impacted by Zone 4 ls listed on
Table 1 below. The City collects fees from all projects located
in the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District. This money will
go for interchange improvements at the intersections of: Palomar
Airport Road; Poinsettia Lane; and La Costa Avenue with
Interstate 5. The cost of improving the intersection of Palomar
Airport Road and Interstate 5 which is not included in Table 1
and which is located in Zone 3 is estimated at $5,100,000. The
cost of improving the la Costa Avenue/1-5 interchange which is
not impacted by. Zone 4 traffic has not been included here.
· The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF)
which ls set at 2.51 of permit valuation. This fee is paid at
time of building permit issuance. Certain street improvements as
well as all needed traffic signals in Zone 4 will be paid for by
Public Facilities Fees. See Table 1 below.
ZONE~
BUILDOUT INPROVENENTS
TABLE 1
(A) Freeway.Bridge Widening and Ramp lmprovments -$4,990,670 as
part of the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District
(B) Traffic Signal -Poinsettia and Freeway -$120,000 -PFF
(C) Traffic Signal -Paseo del Norte and Poinsettia -$65,000 -
PFF
(D) Traffic Signal -Poinsettia and Lagoon -$65,000 -PFF
73
74
FIRE
t
* PIR■ ITATION8-aXIITINCI
0 ,tit■ ITATIONl-1'1.ANlaD
( .. , ... , .,
l'IRE RESPONSE TIME
--STATION f
--STATION 2
•--STATION a
--STATION <J
ZONE 4
PAlOMAI
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
75
FIRE
Cllr•-Qrowlll..._.. ,..,.._ e
JANUARY 1187
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION
EXISTING ~,448 Units
$81 Units
APPROVED
C, z -rn
< % a.
FUTURE 3,029 Units
FIRE
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Ccifun•• .,.lllilrd)
* YES
* YES
* YES
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
.
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
N/A
* The existing Fire Station locations will guarantee compliance with the
adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out.
76
FIRE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute
response time.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 4 ls presently served by Fire Station No. 4 located
at 6885 Batiquitos Road.
B. Phasing
Because all existing plus future development in Zone 4 is
within the five minute response time of Fire Station No. 4, Zone
4 will conform to the fire performance standard to buildout.
Therefore, it was not necessary to do a phasing analysis for fire
services in Zone 4.
c. Adequacy Findings
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 4 presently meets
the fire performance standard and will continue to· conform to
this standard to buildout of the City.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
No conditions are necessary for fire services in Zone 4
because Fire Station 4 ls located within the required five minute
response time of the entire zone.
B. Financing
All fire facilities are in place for Zone 4 and the
required performance standard has been met and, therefore, no
special funding mechanisms are required.
77
78
OPEN SPACE
ZONE 4
ZONES
..
I . I
I
.,~::!!::::::..----~lh"L-
1 . I jj
I
I
! ..
ZCH, !
!
! I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I . . , ,.._ .,· . .._.,
OPEN ·SPACE
.... ..,
;
i • ; ZONUt i i ,·
i ..
t
cn,e1c.,_ a,--------
-JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
79
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ·PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
APPROVED *
C, z -u,
< ::c
Q.
FUTURE *
OPEN SPACE
SUMMARY SHEET
SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Calul.,.w::e
W/St ... rd)
* YES
* YES
* YES
MITIGATION
NIA
N/A
NIA
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
NIA
* Zone 4 as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will conform
to the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out.
80
OPEN SPACE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone
exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land
must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available
concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan it was determined that certain areas of the
City are already developed or meet or exceed the requirements for
Open Space and, therefore, an analysis is not needed in the local
plan. This includes Zones 1 through 10, as well as, 16. Zone 4,
an infill zone, is almost completely built out with only a small
amount of remaining land available for development. This
eliminates the opportunity to create future permanent open space
unless existing structures are removed. For these reasons, the
·open Space facility for Zone 4 needs no further analysis.
B. Phasing
Because Zone 4 is an infill zone with no future
opportunity to increase open space, the phasing requirements for
Open Space were not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
c. Adequacy Findings
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that the adopted performance
standards for Open Space in Zone 4 have already been met.
III.
A.
B.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 4
There are no special conditions which apply at this time.
Financing
Because Zone 4 creates a minimal amount of future
development, it has been assumed this development will continue
to meet the adopted performance standard. Therefore, financing
was not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(3) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
81
82
SCHOOLS
School District Boundaries
CARLSBAD
,
to I
ZONE 4
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
83
01,., _ ____ ,,.._
-JANUARY 198i
EXISTING
• 11.DaNTARY • JUNIOR HIGH
A HIGH SCHOOL
fY!!!!!
0 ELEloENTARY
□ JUNIOR HIGH
t:,. HIGH SCHOOL
ZONE 4
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
84
Do
·SCHOOLS
I \,. '"" Y" I I I
I
I I
CltyofC•tweo
G,owtfl ~ Pr'9am
II
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ·PLAN-Zone 4
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
APPROVED ---
C, z -"' < :r;
a.
FUTURE **
SCHOOLS
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Ccntamw ice w/StSldard)
* YES
---YES
** YES
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
NIA
* The Carlsbad Unified School District has capacity to meet the existing demands
generated from Zone I&.
** Because the future school demand from Zone II is minimal, the School District has
indicated that it is able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out.
85
SCHOOLS.
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within
the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be
provided prior to projected occupancy.
II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 4 falls completely within the boundaries of the
Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are no
schools in the Southwest Quadrant. Elementary school students in
Zone 4 attend Jefferson Street or Pine Street Elementary Schools.
Secondary school students attend Carlsbad Junior and Senior High
Schools.
The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identifies
general locations for future school sites in each school
category. The locations are a result of the School Master
Location Study, completed in 1982. The Carlsbad Unified School
District ls in the process of beginning to update the School
Master Location Plan.
8. Phasing
In Zone 4 there are presently 2,448 existing residential
dwelling units. As the zone builds out, there will be an
additional 581 residential dwelling units. These units will add
approximately 200 to 250 students to the school demand generated
by Zone 4. The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated
the ability to handle the additional demand. Based upon the
School District's indication, the adopted performance standard
will continue to be met, and therefore, phasing of school
facilities was not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
c. Adequacy Findings
The Carlsbad Unified School District is currently
providing capacity for the existing demand generated by Zone 4.
The School District has indicated its ability to provide capacity
to the ultimate buildout of Zone 4.
86
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
No conditions are necessary. The Carlsbad Unified School
District has indicated they will be able to accommodate the
additional number of students generated through the buildout of
Zone 4.
B. Financing
No financing options are necessary. The Carlsbad School
District has indicated that they can accommodate the additional
students generated in Zone 4 with existing facilities. Since
existing facilities can handle the additional students, no
financing alternatives for new facilities are required. All
future development will be required to pay the appropriate school
fees as determined by the District.
87
88
SEWER SYSTEM
CARLSBAD
ZONE 4
Sewer Dictricts
ti)
r--'!
L., ....
i SAN MARCOS s ...... .,
t ""·,
LEUCADIA COUNTY
c:os r.•
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
89
ENCtNA
WASTE WATER
TREATMENT
FACILITY
ZONE 4
.. .. .
54• SAN MAACOS INTl!RCl!P'TOI! (WATEAJ
30" BUl!NA VISTA INTERCEP'TOA(SANITATIONI
l .
! ·, ....
I
I
I
I ,.
i
I
I
I
-..
SEWER BASIN
E·2
Existing Sewer Facilities
I
........
I
I ;
i
I
I i
....... BASIN ■·OUNDARV
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
90
BUILDOUT
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION-DEMAND SUPPLY (CcnlalllWIN wlllt■mrct) MITIGATION FUNDING
*
EXISTING 4. 2*-* YES N/A
MGD
0.745
*
APPROVED 4.2** YES . N/ A
MGD
C, 0.745 z -en ,c
l: a. * FUTURE *** YES*** ***
MGD
0.754
* Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity.
** 2~9 MGD Buena Sanitation interceptor and 1.3 MGD for the North
Batiquitos/Ponto interceptor. The Buena Sanitation interceptor
capacity is based on existing agreements with Buena Sanitation
District and the City.
N/A
N/A
***
*** Zone 4 will be able to completely build out in conformance with the
adopted performance standard. Although, both interceptors will be
upgraded as a result of future upstream demands generated outside of
Zone 4. Specific improvements will be identified in the Sewer Master
Plan update and the exact timing of these improvements will be
provided in the Local Plans for Zones 6, 19, 20 and 21.
91
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Trunk line
appropriate sewer
development.
capacity to meet demand as determined by the
district must be provided concurrent with
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Service Are,
Zone 4 lies entirely within and is served by the City of
Carlsbad Sewer Service District.
A. Inventory and Description
Zone 4 is serviced by two trunk line sewer interceptors,
the Buena Sanitation interceptor and the North Batiquitos/Ponto
interceptor. Approximately 1/3 of Zone 4 drains southerly
through 8 and 10 inch sewer collectors to a sewer lift station,
located within Zone 19, adjacent to the north shore of the
Batiquitos Lagoon. This sewer lift station, which is a part of
the North Batiquitos interceptor, also serves portions of Zones
6, 19, 20 and 21. There are 392 dwelling units outside of Zone 4
which currently utilize this sewer lift station.
inch
I-5.
along
Lane
flows
Leaving the lift station, sewage is pumped through a 14
force main to an 18 inch gravity line along the east side of
From there the sewage flows north, crosses under I-5, runs
the Avenlda Encinas right-of-way, turns west on Poinsettia
and flows into the 27 inch Ponto interceptor which gravity
north to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility.
units
to the
4 has
adopted
of Zone
There also is a potential for 520 residential dwelling
to be approved in Zone 20 which will sewer through Zone 4
lift station. Analysis of the gravity system serving Zone
shown that the existing sewer system currently meets the
performance standard and will do so through the buildout
4.
The remainder of Zone 4 drains north through a gravity
sewer collection system to the 30 inch Buena Sanitation
interceptor located just outside Zone 4. The Buena Sanitation
sewer interceptor flows west under 1-5 to the Encina Water
Pollution Control Facility.
With the exception of the Buena Sanitation interceptor all
the sewer collection facilities ~hich service Zone 4 are owned
and maintained by the City of Carlsbad.
92
The Buena Sanitation interceptor is owned and maintained
by the Buena Sanitation District (County of San Diego). By
agreement, the City of Carlsbad shares capacity rights in this
line with the Vista Sanitation District and the Buena Sanitation
District. City capacity rights along this portion of the Buena
line are 32.7351 of the pipe capacity which equates to
approximately 2.90 million gallons per day.
B. Phasing and Service Demand
Existing committed and future sewer collection demands are
shown on Exhibit L, "Sewer Demand" on Page 98. The service
demands have been divided by interceptor to facilitate future
analysis of each of these major sewer trunk line interceptors.
The City ls currently in the process of revising and updating the
sewer master plan. Until these revisions have been completed,
analysis of the upstream service demands cannot be fully
assessed, although the analysis for Zone 4 has been com~leted.
Facility Analysis
The existing sewer collection networks for Zone 4 will
conform with the adopted performance standard for existing and
committed service demand. The ultimate buildout of Zone 4,
which is limited to an additional 5.12 acres of commercial use
located at the southwest corner of Poinsettia and Paseo del
Norte, will not necessitate upgrading these facilities and will,
therefore, conform with the adopted performance standard. The
detailed analysis of the buildout needs of the North
Batiquitos/Ponto interceptor will not be available until the
sewer master plan has been updated or as upstream zones prepare
their local plans.
The ultimate buildout of Zone 4 will not increase flows to
the Buena Sanitation interceptor trunk line which will conform
with the adopted performance standard to buildout of this zone.
Preliminary analysis indicates the North Batiquitos/Ponto
interceptor will not conform with the adopted performance at
buildout, as a result of upstream demands outside of Zone 4. The
detailed analysis of the buildout needs of the North Batiquitos/
Ponto interceptor will not be available until the sewer master
plan has been updat~d or as upstream zones (6, 19, 20 and 21)
prepa~e their local plans.
C. Adequacy Findings
The
performance
change this
handle Zone
sewer collection system currently meets the adopted
standard. Zone 4 will be able to buildout and not
conclusion, because the necessary facilities to
4's demand are already in place. However, as
93
upstream or out-of-zone development is proposed, certain
facilities will need to be upgraded. The specific improvements
will be addressed in the revised Sewer Master Plan as well as
when the local plans which will impact this line are prepared.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 4
The facility analysis above indicated that the sewer
collection system for Zone 4 will conform to the adopted
performance standard to the buildout of the zone. Therefore,
pursuant to Section 21.90.110(d)(4) of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, no special conditions on future development are required at
this time other than payment of normal sewer connection fees.
B. Financing
Future development will continue to pay sewer related fees
which will assist in funding the improvement operations and
maintenance of the system.
94
Master Plan
Demand Trunkllne Reach
Status Interceetor Designation
Existing Buena Sanitation 209-610
Ponto 707-709
Committed N/A
Future Ponto 707-709
Buena Sanitation
\0 U1
SEWER DEMAND
ZONE 4
Land
Use
Residential
Residential
Commercial
None
Acres/Number Demand (EDU's)* Demand
of Units Subtotal
2,179 2,179 2,179
850 850 850
5.12 AC 36 36
* Equivalent dwelling mlts \\hlch equal
average dally flow divided by 246
Gallons Per Day
m X :z:
a,
-I
r
96
WATER SYSTEM
ZONE 4
WATER SERVICE DISTRICTS
OllVENHAIN
r-
/SAN MARCOS
i
J1u111111111un1u111111111mud.-l = = : ◄"',
If
Cl1YolC•-
Grawtt1 ~-Jlr~am e
JANUARY 1187
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
97
ZONE 4
l. ! 4-,_.
!
!
I
I ..
!
I
• .
ZONI 5
·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·----
WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM .
I . I .
I . I .
;
i i
ZONE :ZU
f! -EXISTING WATER LINES
I . I -PROPOSED WA TEA LINIS
i A EXISTING PREIIUM REGULATING STATIOII
I 6 PROPOSED PRl88URI REGULATING STATION
ZONE BOUNDARY i '4-'4-•4-•4-
...
., •4-•4-.,.....___
I .
I . ZONE 19
JANUARY 1187
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
98
BUILDOUT
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 4
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CCl1ifcw11•a w/Stln:lard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING * * YES N/A
APPROVED ------· YES N/A
C, z -Cl)
< ::c .
a.
FUTURE ** ** YES N/A
I
* The Costa Real Water-Distr-ict has capacity to meet the existing demands of
Zone 4.
N/A
N/A
NIA
** Because the futur-e demands fr-om Zone 4 will be minimal, the Water-Distr-ict has
indicated that it will be able to pr-ovide capacity at all times as the Zone .builds
out.
99
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Line
appropriate
development.
capacity to meet demand as determined by the
water district must be provided concurrent with
A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided
prior to any development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory and Description
Water service in the City of Carlsbad ls provided by three
independent agencies, Costa Real Municipal Water District, San
Marcos County Water District, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water
District. Water service for Zone 4 is provided entirely by the
Costa Real Municipal Water District.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those
facilities which need to be added, upgraded, and improved in
order to meet the needs of future growth within their service
area. The facilities shown on map, "Water Distribution System"
on Page 101 are currently in place and servicing the existing
development.
When the remaining commercial site develops, certain
facilities will need to be added to service this new demand. As
identified by the Costa Real Municipal Water District, these
facilities will be financed jointly by direct developer
contribution and the District's Capital Fund.
B. Phasing
The performance standard indicates that line capacity must
meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has indicated that
improvements remaining in Zone 4, can be handled at the time the
remaining commercial site develops.
c. Adequacy Findings
The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 4
conforms with the adopted performance standard. Because this
zone ls almost completely built out, the additional water demands
as determined by the Costa Real Municipal Water District, will be
minimal and conformance with the standard will be maintained to
the ultimate buildout of Zone 4.
100
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 4
All development within Zone 4 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
B. Financing
Remaining facilities and improvements in Zone 4 will be
financed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District's Capital
Fund. Revenues for that budget are funded from direct .developer
contributions to the District.
101
102
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
103
ADT Average daily
ciaTly vehicle trips
associated region.
GLOSSARY
trips. A guide of average, or estimated
generated from a specific project or
£!:!. Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal
description which specifically identifies each parcel of land.
Buildout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely
developed with all associated public facilities in place.
Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district established
to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These
bridge improvements are at I-5, Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia
Lane, and La Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125.
CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program.
Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the
broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located
adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned.
Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone,
quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard.
DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit.
EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage
generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and
industrial developments are also converted into EDU's to assess
their direct impact upon facilities.
Environmentally Constrained lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways,
other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes
greater than 251, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major
powerline easements.
104
General Plan Density Ranges
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL -Residential Low
RLM -Residential Low-Medium
RM -Residential Medium
RHH -Residential Medium-High
RH -Residential High
Growth Management Control Point
0 -1.5
0 -4.0
4.0 -8.0
8.0 -15.0
15 .o -23 .o
Residential Land Use
·Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
1.0
3.2
6.0
11.S
19.0
Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each
designation or the midpoint of the density range.
ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of
traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to
the capacity of an intersection.
Level of Service The relative level of operation of an
intersection or traffic signal.
Level of
Service
(LOS)
A
B
Description
Free flow (relatively). If signalized,
conditions are such that no approach
phase ls fully utilized by traffic and
no vehicle waits through more than one
red indication. Very slight or no delay.
Stable flow. If signalized, an occa-
sional approach phase is fully utilized;
vehicle platoons are formed. This level
is suitable operation for rural design
purposes. Slight delay •
. 105
ICU
Value
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
Level of
· Service
(LOS)
C
D
E
f
Description
Stable flow of operation. If signalized,
drivers occasionally may have to wait
through more than one red indication.
Acceptable delay.
Approaching unstable flow or operation;
queues develop, but are periodically
cleared. Tolerable delay.
Unstable flow or operation; the inter-
section has reached ultimate capacity;
this condition ls not uncommon in peak
hours. Congestion and intolerable delay.
Forced flow or operation. Intersection
operates below capacity.
ICU
Value
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.00+
Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87.
HGD Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of
water or sewage.
Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% --------,,----.-----constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40%
slopes. Industrial and commercial development were then
multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all
regulations which affect overall lot coverage).
Open S~ace Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned
resident al development (PRO), common areas, tennis courts, or
other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities,
such as major power line easements.
PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of
building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes.
PFF -Public Facility Fee. A 2.51 fee paid prior to the issuance of building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for
the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and
equipping public property, improvements, and facilities.
106
Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only
one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool,
etc.
TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building
permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City
is divided into two fee categories: 1) The La Costa area and 2)
the remainder of the City. See Exhibit T, on Page-126.
Turn Key Facility -a facility constructed by developer(s) and
turned over or dedicated to the City after its completion.
107
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
POIN8ETTIA LN ,+
~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY
ZONE 4
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
108
~,,_MELROSE
-~~7 AYE
cn,a1_ Orowlll ...._,_ ,."G'_
-JANUARY 1187
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
POINSETTIA LN _.
1111111 AREA BOUNDARY t
ZONE 4 JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
109
APPENDIX 2
110
·-----~-----------------
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lO
11
12
I q
13!
14
15
16
17
I
1al! ,. p
19 !f
11 201!
!I
21 1/ II 2211
I 23:
241!
25 I
26
27 !: ,,
28 'I
n~DINANCE NO. 9808 -----
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFOPNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ~Y. THE ADnITION OF
CHAPTER 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGniF.NT
PROGRAM FOP THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition of
Chapter 21.90 to read as follows:
Sections:
21.90.010
21.90.020
21.90.030
21.90.031
21.90.032
21.90.033
21.90.040
21.90.050
21.90.060
21.90.070
21.90.080
21.90.090
21.90.100
21.90.110
,, 21.90.120
21.90.125
21.90.130
21.90.140
21.90.150
21.90.160
21.90.170
21.90.180
21.90.190
"Chapter 21.90
Growth Management
Purnose and intent.
Definitions.
General prohibition, exceptions.
Tolling of time for consideration of
applications submitted before the effective
date of this chapter.
Tollino of expiration of previously issued
development permits.
Extensions of prior approvals prohibited.
Comoliance with this chapter reouired.
Establishment of local facilities management
fee.
Spec~.al provisions for buildinq permits
issued during temporary moratorium.
Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imposed by sections
21.90.050 and 21.90.060.
Perfornance standard. -
Citywide facilities and improvements plan.
Local facilities management zones.
Contents ~f local facility management plans.
Facilities management plan preoartion.
Facilities management plan orocessinq.
Implementation of facilities and
improvements reouirements.
Obligation to oay fees or install
improvements reauired by any other law.
Implementing guidelines.
Exclusions.
Council actions, fees, notice.
Expiration of chapter.
Severability.
1.
111
:1
I
31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
141
151
161 I 171,
18 ii ,1
19 11
20l1
2111
221 I
23
24
25
26
27
28
21.90.010 Puroose and intent.
(a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to:
(1) Provide auality housina opportunities for all
economic sectors of the cc~~unity:
(2) Provide a balanced co~~unitv ~ith adeauate
commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to
support the residential areas of the City:
(3) Ensure that public facilities and i~provements
meeting City standards are available concurrent with the need
created by new development:
(4) Balance the housino needs of the reqion
against the public service needs of Carlsbad residents· and
available fiscal and environmental resources:
(5) Encouraoe infill development in urbanized
areas before allowing extensions of public facilities and
improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized:
(6) Ensure that all development is consistent with
the Carlsbad general plan:
(7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public
facilities and improvements are provided in a phased and logical
fashion as -reauired by the general plan:
(8) Control of the timing and location of
development by tying the pace of development to the provision of
public facilities and improvements at the times established by
the citywide facilities and improvements plan.
(b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined despite previous City Council actions including but
not liIT'ii ted to, ainendments to the land use, housing, and parks
and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City
Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic imoact fees, and
modification of park dedication and improvement requirements,
that the demand for facilities and improvements has outpaced the
supply resulting in shortages in public facilities and
improvements, includin9 but not limited to streets, parks, open
space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general
governmental facilities. The City Council has further determine
that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet
and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad.
(c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the
implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to
eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure
that no,development occurs without providing for adeauate I
facilities and improvements, to regulate the pace of development
thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of
years and to continue the auality of life for all economic
sectors of the Carlsbad community.
(d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and
objectives established herein by requiring identification of all
public facilities and improvements required for development, by
prohibiting development until adequate provisions for the public
facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects
within the City, and by giving develop~ent priority to areas of
the City where public facilities and i~provements are already in
place (infill areas).
2.
112 -I
l
2
-3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16'
17
1a·j
19,!
2oli Ii
21Jj
22: I
23 1
24
251
I
26
21 .I
2a Ii 11
Ii Ii
II 1,
(e) This chapter replaces the terriporary ~oratorium on
processing and approval of developrrient projects imposed bv City
Council Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.020 Definitions.
{a) Whenever the following terms are used in this
chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section
unless from the context it is apparent that another ~eanina is
intended: -
(1) "Citywide facilities and improvel'l'!ents plan"
means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.090
identifying those facilities and improvements required on a
citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as
. established by the general plan and providing an outline and
budget for financ1ng certain facilities and irrtprovelllents which
will be provided by the City.
(2) •Development pennit• means any pemit,
entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial
issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any leqislative
actions such as zone chanqes, general plan amendments, or master
plan approval or amendment. ·
(3) "Development• means any use to which land is
put, building or other alteration of land and construction
inciden~ thereto.
(4) •racilities• means ·any schools, r;>arks, open
space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire,
library, or govern~ental services; identified in a facilities
management plan.
(5) "I•provement• includes traffic controls,
streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks,
bridges, overcross ings, street interchanges, flood control ·or
storm drain facilities, sewer faci"lities, water facilities and
lighting facilities.
· · · · (6) "Local facilities management plan" means a
facilities manaqe~ent plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a
local facilities manage~ent zone which is established according
to Section 21.90.100.
21.90.030 General rohibition exce tions.
a Un ess exempted y t e prov s1ons o this chapter
no application for any building permit or develop~ent permit
shall be accepted, processed or ap~roved until a citywide
facilities and i~provements plan has been adopted and a local
facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities
management zone has been submitted and approved according to thi
chapter. (b) No zone change, general plan amendment, master pla
a•endment or specific plan amendment which would incease the
residential density or development intensity established by the
general plan in effect on the effective date of this chaoter
shall be approved unless an amend~ent to the citywide facilities
manage~ent plan and the applicable local f~cilities manaae~ent
plan has first heen approved.
3.
113 I i ,-
1 ~
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 ,I
20
21 I
221
23
24
25
26
27
(c) The classes of projects or permits listed in this
subsection shall be exempt from the provisions of subsection (a).
Development permits and building permits for these projects
shall be subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywide
facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local
facilities management plan •
. (1) Redevelopment projects.
(2) Projects consisting of the construction or
alteration of a single dwelling structure for a family on a lot
owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not
to exceed one nonowner-occupied house per individual for one or
more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986.
(3) Building permits and final maps for projects
identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects for
which construction had commenced and were designated on the map
·marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 •as developing").
(4) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits. were issued or approved on or befor
January 21, 1986. If all required development permits were
issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall
apply to that portion. · ·
(5) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were is•u•d or approved before July
. 20, 1986 and for which building permits could have been issued
under OrdinJnce No. 9791. If all required development permits
were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption
shall apply to that portion.
(6) Commercial and industrial projects with
approved development permits or with a complete application on
file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. New
perm.its for commercial and indu~trial projects located within an
area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be
processed and approved. . .
(7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures
and us~s for youth recreational and guidance programs such as
boys and girls clubs.
C 8) Zone changes or general plan amendments
necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and
zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or
which the City Council finds will not increase the public
facilities or services and which are initiated by the City
Council or Planning Commission.
(9) Public utility facilities and improve~ent
projects without accommodations for permanent employees are
exempt fro~ the provisions of·this chapter unless the City
Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to
impact public facilities.
(10) Adjustment plats.
(11) Development permits for minor subdivisions
located in the northwest quadrant of the City as defined in
Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or
industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may be
approved. Residential building permits will not be ap9roved for ·
lots in such subdivisions unless oth~rwise e~empt under this
4.
114
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s I
I
19,I
2011
21 11 II I. 22 1 I
23
24
25 !
"
26 ii
27 \, ,j
281
i ;
I
.1 I,
chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot may be
approved for each such subdivision.
(d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final
maps and other development permits for projects with a tentative
map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the
exemptions listed in subsection (c) •
. (1) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa
approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of
the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel map ~ay be
processed and approved before the adoption of a local facility
management plan.-The expiration period for those tentative maps
shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The
expiration of any development permits issued _in conjunction with
those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities
management plan is approved or, two years after the date the
citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
· (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa
approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th
approval of final map or parcel map was prohibited by· Ordinance
No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is
prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local
facilities management plan. The expiration period of those
tentative maps and tentative parc~l ma-ps, and any other
development permits issued in conjunction with-the maps shall be
tolled unti-1 the local facilities management plan is approved,
or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements
plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
(e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c
( 3), ( 4), ( 5), and ( 6) shall expire on ·July 20, 1988. After tha
date all development permits for those projects shall be fully
subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for
projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall
apply only so long as the facilities and improvements reauired a
a condition to the issuance of -final development permits have
been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured
agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement agreement
shall subject any remaining building permits for the project to
the provisions of subsection (a).
(f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in
subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all
the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this
Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 may be
approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate,
af~er July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be
subject to the exemption of .subsection ( c).
(g) The City Council may authorize the processing of
and decision making on building permits and development perniits
for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986
subject to the following restrictions:
(1) The City Council finds that the facilities an
improvements reauired by the master plan are sufficient to meet
the needs created by the project and that the master plan
developer has agreed to install those facilities and i~provement ·
to the satisfaction of the City Council.
s.
115 ,_
! :
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 l I
l9!i
i 20 I !
21 ! r ;I
22: I
23 1
24 ~5,
261
27'
·'' 2a 1
ii I.
(2) The master plan developer shall agree in
writing that all facilities and improvement requirements,
including but not limited to the payment of fees established by
the citywide facilities and management plan and the applicable
local facilities management plan shall be applicable to
development within the master plan area and that the master plan
developer shall comply with those plans.
(3) The master plan establishes an educational
park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of
the educational facility.
(4.) Building perniits for the 129 unit residential
portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the
applicant has provided written evidence that an educational
entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council
finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent o
the approved master plan.
( 5) Prior to the approval of the f ina-l map for
Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to
participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and
wetland resource area and made any dedications of property.
necessary to accomplish the restoration. ·
Ch) After making the findings in paragraph l the City
Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on
master plans subject to the requirements of paragraph 2. After
the grant of the easement required by· subpara_gra-ph ( h) ( iv) ·the
tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the
commercial development and the lo·cal coastal plan amendment may
also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted
and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and
building permits for construction of the golf course and first
phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed
and approved. ·
. The processing and approval of.all other developments
and building permits within the master plan shall not .occur unti
after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities
management plan have been adopted by the City Council.
(l){i) That the master plan will provide all
necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any
facilities deficits in the area affected by the project.
(ii) That the approval will not prejudice the
preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the
level of public facilities and services in the area.
(iii) That by the dedication of land and the
construction of public improvements the project will make a .
significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the
city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of
sianificant environmental resources.
· ( 2) ( i > The master plan shall include all of the
information required by and implementing the provisions of
Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the
master plan.
(ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that al
facilities and improvement reQuirements, including but not I.
limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide I
6.
116
l
2
I
3!
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
Q < CD I 13 en ·i! ~ < ... ·u < 14 1 :> , -::i z ~ ..I! :> ► > 15 ii!::<!!:
(.J 2 ..J i.: . ..I< ►WI(,,)
~LM~Q 16 u z <
J :s -CD ; t: '.1 111 > a: < < > (.J I I-I• <3 1811
11
19 Ii
[,
201:
I
21 JI
221
23
241
25
26
27 I ,1 11
28 I
facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local
facilities management plan shall be applicable to ·development
within the master plan area and that the master plan developer
shall comply with those requirements.
(iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to
participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and·
wetland resource area. ,
(iv) Prior to any processing on the master plan
the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessary
for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for the
widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino
Real.
21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of
applications submitted before the effective date of this
chapter.
After approval of the citywide facilities and
improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management
plan applications for development permits which were accepted as
complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have
processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date.
Until the approval of the plans all a~plicable time limits for
processing the development permits shall be tolled.
21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of previously issued
development permits. If a discretionary development permit, other than a
development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map,
issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within
which building permits must be issued and ½he issuance of
building permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter
then the expiration period shall be tolled .until the applicable
local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after
the date the citywide p~an is approved, whichever occurs first.
21.90.033 Extensions of rohibited.
Ater approva o an app 1cab e oca · ac1 1t1es
management plan an extension of the expiration date of any
development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is
found to be consistent with the plan. The decision making body
considering an extension may condition the extension upon
compliaoce with the citywide plan and applicable local
facilities management ~lan.
21.90.040 Com liance with this cha ter.
a No deve opment permits all be approved unless the
approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the
citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable
local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the
approving authority may impose any condition to the approval
necessary to implement the plans.
(b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees
required by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities
management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consisten
7.
117
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
141
isl
isl
I
171 I!
1ai1 ,I
j,
19!!
1;
2011
21 ,·
I 221
231
24
with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a
condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to
Section 21.90.030(c) the applicant shall agree to pay the
appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is
established.
Cc) The requirements of this chapter are imposed as a
condition of zoning on the property to ensure iniplementation of
and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities an
improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to
or concurrently with need.
21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities management
fee. -(a) A local facilities management fee is hereby
established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in
local facilities management plan which are related to new
development within the zone and are not otherwis~ financed by an
other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by
a developer as a condition of a building permit or development
permit. The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the
facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities
and improvements plan attributed to development within the local
zone which are not financed by other means~ The facilities
management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building
permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th
estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as
necessary to accommodate additional development within the
applicable loca·l facilities management zone plus the estimated
cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide
facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone.
The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development.
(b) The fee required by this section is in addition to
any other means of fin~ .. cing facilities or improvements
identified by a local facilities management plan or any other
tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed
on the development of property under the provisions of state law
this code or City Council policy.
(c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities
management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a
public hearing, published notice of which shall be given
according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.S4.060(2) and
Government Code Section 54992.
(d) As. a condition of any building or development
permit application submitted after the effective date of this
·chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by
this section at the time a building permit is issued.
(e} The fee established by this section shall be levie
at the time of issuance of a building permit.
21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits
issued durin tern orar moratorium.
a) Ap~licants for proJects for which building permits
were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shal
8.
118
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
0 C m I 13 in ~ ~ 'IC 14 i ~ er: ►>0 15 '::<~
(J 2 :.!
' ... (J ► YI . 16 YI~ 0 i_~ o in t: ..I 17 er: C ~ ► I-
18 I G
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 days afte
the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment
shall be made according to the agreement executed by the
applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.070 Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessarb for the fees imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and
21.90.06 •
(a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of
the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and
21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements
identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to
achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to
implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or
the facilities or improvements are not installed the public
health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be
insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new
development. This finding is based _upon City Council Policy No.
17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented
at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter.
(b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a
development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i
protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o
the protest.
(c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Cod
Section 65913.5.
21.90.080 Performance standard.
The City Council shall adopt general performance
standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section
21.90.090(b) or 21.90.ll0(c). Specific performance standards fo
citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide
facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards
for each zone shall be J10opted as part of the local facilities
management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local
facilities management plan the performance standards established
by a plan are not met then no development permits or building
permits shall b9 issued within the local zone until the
performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the
City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have
been made.
~ 21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and im rovements lan.
a To imp ement the C ty s genera pan by secur ng
provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that
development does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar
available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide
facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all
facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land
uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning: specify
size, capacity and service level performance standards for the
identified facilities and improvements: establish specific time
tables for acquisition, installation and operation of the
facilities and improvements correlated to projected population
9.
119
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
0 < m I 13 en ~ 9; ~ ... 'I.I< 14 8 , --Z z ,.ja: o ►>o 15 cij!::C!!: . u 2 ~ u. ' ~ u ,-► w • l6i zW~Q wZ < u a: _ m z O en s:r:: a! 17 < <
► u ,-1s1i u
i'
19 lj
2oli
1-
2lii
II
22
23
24
I I
25 I'
1!
261
27 I ,I
1!
28
growth, facility and improvement performance standards, and
projected nonresidential development: identify the financing
method or methods for each facility and improvement: and
establish a facility and improvement budget for those facilities
or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the
City. The plan shall encourage infill development and reduce the
growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or
improvements to undeveloped areas by establishing priorities for
facility and improvement installation or financing.
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan shall
show how and when the following facilities and improvements will
be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c).
(1) Major sewage transmission systems and sewage
treatment plants:
(2) Major water transmission lines:
(3) Major area wide drainage facilities:
(4) Prime and Major arterials: freeway
interchanges, bridges or overcrossings:
(5) Fire facilities:
(6) Governmental administration facilities:
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities:
( 8) Libraries.
(c) The plan shall include the following information
with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsectio
( b):
(1) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility and
improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventory
shall be consistent with the general plan and zoning for the
area.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing fo
installation or provisions of facilities or iroprovements in
relationship to the an1011ltt of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space
within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the
facility and improvement performance standards.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the
plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements
which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing
a devel9pment project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilitie
or improvements when required by the phasing schedule.
(d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the pla
to the City Council not later than one year from the effective
date of this ordinance.
10.
120
l
2
:3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Q ~ I 13 ti)
-' a: < .,,
0 1M < 14 -:,-. z . a: ;o 15 !:: C !!:
CJ 2 ~ ;. ~ <.: 16! 1M i Q Z C ~ -iJ ~ -' 17 a: < < ,. CJ
181/ I-i::;
191!
2oli !I
21:i
22 !
23
24
25
26
27
I 28I
(e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and
improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the Plannin9
Commission or City Council.-
21.90.100 Local facilities manaoement zones.
(a) The City Council shall divide the City into
facilities management zones. ·
(b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established
based upon logical facilities and improvements planninq,
construction and service relationships to ensure the economicall
efficient and timely installation of required facilities and
improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council
shall also be guided by the following considerations:
(1) Service areas or drainage basins;
(2) Extent to which facilities or improvements a~e
in place or available;
plan areas1
(3) Ownership of property;
(4) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans;
(S) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans;
(6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master
(7) Boundaries of approved tentative maps;
(8) Public facilities relationships, especially
the relationship to the City's planned major circulation
network;
(9) Special district service territories;
(10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other
facilities or improvement master plans •
(c) The zones shall be established by resolution after
a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section
21.54.060(2) of this code.
21.90.110 Contents of local facilit mana ement lans.
a A local fa~1l1ties management plan shall be
prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone.
(b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables,
narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and
zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan
approval. The local facilities management plan shall be
consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan
shall implement the citywide facilities and improvements plan
within the zone. ·
✓ (c) The facilities management plan shall show how and
when the following facilities and improvements necessary to
accommodate development within the zone will be installed or
financed as specified in subsection (d).
(1) Sewer systems
(2) Water
(3) Drainage
(4) Circulation
(5) Fire facilities
(6) Schools
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities
(8) Open space
11.
121
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
1a I
19!!
2011 .I
2111
22
23
24
25
26
27 l1 ,I I!
281
(d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement the
citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall
include the following information with regard to each facility
and improvement listed in subsection (c):
(1) An inventory of ·present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility. Because
improvement reauirements for certain facilities and improvements
may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for
coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities
extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost
estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development
in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvements
capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in
other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the
performance standard which is established pursuant to Section
21.90.080. The growth inducing impact of the out of zone
improvements shall be assessed.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for
installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space,
etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule
shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not
utilize more than the area's prorata share of facility or
improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity
is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first
development. The phasing schedule shall in·clude a schedule of
development within the zone and a market data and cash flow
analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the
zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the
demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity
and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those
situations when demand ~xceeds capacity and it is not feasible t
increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall
occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the
capacity is established in the plan.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the pla
fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the
zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements
which ws,uld otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing
a development project {i.e. requirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide
facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule
Where facilities or improvements are required for more than one
zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the
plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however,
shall not require identical funding methods.
12.
122
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 < m I 13 <n ~ ~~
• (J "'< 14 g l!; i i z "'cc o ►>O 15 -i--c"-m c3 2 i
i.. '~ (.J .... ~"' . 16 ffi z ~ ~ O~-m ~ ~ ~ 17 > cc < <
► (.J .... c3 18 i
. 191i ,I
20 11 I,
2111
22.1
231
24
25: I
26 Ii
!I 27 :; ::
2811
1.
Ii
11
11 ii
(4) A list or schedule of facilities requirements
correlated to individual developroent projects within the zone.
(e) The local facilities management plan shall
establish the proportionate share of the cost ·of facilities and
improvements identified in the citywide facilities and
improvement plan attributable to developn,ent of property on the
local facilities management zone.
21.90.120 Local facilities management olan
preparation.
{a) A local facilities management plan may be prepared
by the City or by the property owners within the zone accordina
to the procedures established by this section.
(b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may by
resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities
management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the
cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a
hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the propert
owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata
according to acreage and development potential.
Cc) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a
facilities management plan.
(d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie
management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner o~ group o
cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council
to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte
a meeting for which ten days prior written not.ice has been given
to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may
permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the
plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be
detern,ined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be
determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed prorat
based on acreage and development potential to property within th
facilities·management zone. The assessment shall be collected b
the City at the time any application for a developroent project
within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared
the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the
owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be mad
unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not
include interest. ·
(e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group
of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may
decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities
management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to
the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all the
owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d).
a Fac1 ties management pans
according to the following procedure:
rocessina.
reviewed
(1) A completed facilities management plan
complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing
in an amount established by City Council resolution, ~ay be
submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the
13.
123
fee
I
· 1 -' -
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
161
17
1a I
I 19,1
2011
2111
221 1
23
24
i 25 I,
2611
11
27 ii
I
28
Planning Director determines tha~ the plan complies with the
provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a
facilities management plan for public hearing before the Planning
Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete
application.
( 2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the
provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containing
recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to the
public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the
hearing.
(3) The Planning Commission shall hear and
consider the application for a facilities management plan and
shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the
City Council. The action of ·the Commission shall be filed with
the City Clerk, and.a copy shall be mailed to the owners within
the facility zone.
(4) When the Planning Commission action is filed
with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public
hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed
according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2).
(5) The City Council shall hear the matter, .and
after considering the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny
facilities management plan. The C.ity Council may include in the
resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or
facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to
impose on development projects within the zone in order to
implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the
local facilities management plan.
(b) A facilities management plan may be amended
following the same procedures for the original adoption.
(c) A local faci.lities management plan shall be
considered a project for the purposes ~f Title 19 of this Code.
Environmental documents should be processed concurrently ·with th
plan.
21.90.130 Im lementaeion of facilities and im rovement
reauirements.
(a) To ensure that the provisions of this cha0ter and
the general plan are met the following shall apply:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter n
development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is
consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless
provision for all facilities and improvements related to the
development project are provided or funded.
(2) No building.permit shall be issued unless all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities
fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees,
facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewe
fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the
citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities
management plan and adopted by the City Council have first been
paid or provision for their payment has been made to the
satisfaction of the City Council.
14.
1211
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
~:!1
20
21
221
23 1
24
I 251, " I
2sl
I
27 !i
,!
28
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan and
the local facility management plan process is part of the City's
ongoing planning effort. It is anttcipated that amendments to
the plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management
plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any
particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular
development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements
plan and the ·1ocal facilities management plans are guides to
ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or
improvements will be available to meet demands created by
development. Th.e City Counci 1 may initiate an amendment to any
of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that
an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and
improvements. ·
Cc) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of
the City Manager that facilities or i.nlprovements within a
facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate
any furth·er development within that zone or that the performance
standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being n,et
he shall immediately report the deficiency to the Council. If
the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further
building or development permits shall be issued within the
affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an
amendment to the citywide facilittes· and improvements plan or
applicable local facilities management plan.which addresses the
deficien·cy ·ts approved by the City Council and the perfornance
standard is met. ·
(d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen
activity for each local facilities management zone and shall
prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps,
graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a
developniental activity analysis~. a facilities and improvements
adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and
recommendation for any amendments to the facilities management
plan. The co~tent of the annual report shall be established by
the City Council.
(e) The City Council shall annually review the citywid
facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the
City's capital improvement budget.
21.90.140 Obligation to pay fees or install
improvements reauired by any other law.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as
relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public
improvement requirement, dedication reauirement or fee
requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21
of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy.
21.90.150 Implementino guidelines.
The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems
necessary to implement this chapter.
21.90.160 Exclusions.
(a) Development proposals which consist of facilities,
15.
125
l
2
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 !
201[
211
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
or structures constructed by a city, county, special district,
state, or federal government or any agency, department, or
subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded from
the provisions of this chapter. · This exclusion shall not apply
to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax would
be applicable.
{b) Tentative maps the application for which was
accepted before August 6, 1985 ~ay be approved without complyino
with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other -
development permits or building permits for the project shall be
subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map
shall be subject to Section 21.90.030.
21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice.
(a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an
action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision
shall be accomplished by a resolution.
(b) The City Council shall establish application and
processing fees for·the submission and processing of facilities
management plans and for any other request made under Section
21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140.
(c) Whenever written notice is required to be given
to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed
by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll.
21.90.180 Expiration of chapter.
This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless it is
extended or reenacted on or before that date.
21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this
chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any ~ourt of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council
declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in thi
chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phras
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
,,-SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following
findings:
1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been
undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of it
General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed
Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and
recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council
Included in the recom~endations of the Citizens Committee were
recommendations that no new development should occur unless
16.
126
l
2
5
6
7
ai
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
j,
lSP
19!!
2oli I!
2111
22: '
23
24
25
26
27
i 281
adequate public facilities are available concurrently with need
to serve the new development.
2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interi~
Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls
on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation
of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the
restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. on
December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several
land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee
report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency
Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development
approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On
April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No.
17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic
impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council
finds that all of _these actions plus the adoption of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure
adequate public facilities are available to serve any new
development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the
requirements imposed by it, adequate public facilities may not b
available to serve new development or building. Development or
building without public facilities is contrary to the City
General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and
safety.
3. This action of the City Council is consistent with
long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure
adequa.te public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of
Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and
drainage facilities, su-iicient fire protection and recreation
facilities.
4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to
provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the
community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing
continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not
affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition,
develop~ent of housing for low and moderate income persons and
families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are
designated for highest development priority. By encouraging
development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is
already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced.
s. Because any new development affects public facility
availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic
will be used to provide public facilities on any new building in
the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and
charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect th
public health and safety by reducing the-safety of its City's
streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fir
17.
127
l·
2
I
31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
I
141 isl
I
161
I
11!! ,:
181!
19.I
I! 20::
!I
21!1 ii
22:1
23
24
facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and
recreational facilities.
6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not advers&ly affect
the regional welfare. By ensuring that adequate and safe public
facilities and improvements will exist to serve all of the .
development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and
improvements are used by persons residing in neighboring areas
and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is
enhanced.
SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the
growth management program contained in Chapter 21.90 by following
the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this
ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without
amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplis
effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a
least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days ·after its
adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this
ordinance shall be effec:.:ive as to building permits for single o
multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of
this ordinance.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City council held on the 24th .,,. day of June -------
1986 and thereafter
18.
128
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 /
11
12
25
26
27
.2a I
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the 1st day of __ J_u~lv....._ ___ , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
19. 129 •
CULSBAD Ciff COOWCIL GROll'l'B ll&W&G■NaT Pl.A■
•■-•9in9 a aeapoaaible aa4 Pr09r•••i•• Carlsbad Putare•
I. Citywide Pacilities and Improvement Plan
A. Growth Control Mapping and Planning Systems
1. The General Plan will be utilized ·as the overalr
base map with a maximum residential utilization
i.e. mean density.
2. A citywide map will show all current and future
public facilities and improve■ents. Each public
facility and improvement will also be shown
separately on a citywide map.
3. A citywide environmental constraints and open space
map will be prepared.
4. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants
to show greater area detail.
B. Manaqement Performance Standards
1. Establish overall performance or adequacy standards
for each public facility and improvement.
2. !stablish thresholds for each public facility and
improvement.
c. Citywide Pinancinq Option■
1. Pinancing options will be identified for each
facility and improvement.
2. ✓Budgeting for citywide public facility and
improvement will be in conjunction with the City's
five year capital improvement budget.
D. Citywide Plan
1. A Citywide Pacilitiea and Improvements Plan will be
prepared using growth control maps, performance
standards and financing options.
-1-
130
E. Development of Local Paeility Management and Planning
zones.
1. The City ·shall be divided into 25 specific zones.
2. The size of each zone shall depend upon major
circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership
boundaries, and other identifiable characteristics.
3. The purpose of zonesa
a. Requires landowners to work together in order to
present development plans in accordance with the
City's Growth Management Program~
b. Requires landowners to provide development plans
which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and
to relate develop■ent to adjacent zones.
c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to
development approval •
. 4. Bach zone will have a aaximua residential
u~ilization i.e. ■ean densit~. Specific densities
for. individual develop■ent plans within the zone,
however, will be controiled through the normal
planning process.
5. Bach zone must conform to the General Plan and the
Growth Management Ordinance.
II. Pacility Management Zone Processing
A. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for
prqeeseing concurrently with ·normal environmental
analysis.
B. Local facilities ■ana9eaent plane shall conform to all
standard• of the Growth Control Mapping and Planning
syste■s and other existing City standards.
c. Th• local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan
to assure adequate funding of all citywide facilities
_ and improvements identified in th• citywide plan. The
local plan ■ball also proYide a detailed financial plan
for all public facilities and improvements located
within the local facilities aanagement zone.
All development within the local facilities management
zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and
improvement performance standards.
D. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan
·and environmental analysis will be held concurrently.
Notice to all landowners within.the zone as well as
surrounding adjacent zone landowners.
-2-
131
.... -.. .:;
1. A'fter the public hearinf is complet•d on the local
facilities mana9ement zone and environmental analysis,
then th• specific development plans will be process•d in
the normal method.
p. 1ach local facilities 11ana9e■ent plan will be reviewed
annually by th• City to ensure that all performance
standai-d• are bein9 met. If they are not, development
will be atopped.
S/13/8,
ad
132
APPENDIX 3
133
REFERENCE SOURCES
1. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad,
Revised September 29, 1986
2. Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June,
1980
3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad
November, 1976
June, 1984
April, 1985
4. Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, February,
1%5
5. Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of
Carlsbad, June, 1982
6. Memo to Planning ~ommission from Parks and Recreation
Director, dated March 26, 1987
7. Circulation. Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad
8. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works
Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984
9. Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987
10. Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987
11. Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991
134
APPENDIX 4
135
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
· PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2659
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL
· ~ACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 4 ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, NORTH OF
AND INCLUDING THE ENCINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, EAST
OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN TO A POINT JUST EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE.
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.:
CITY OF CARLSBAD:
LOCAL FACILIITES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 4
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797
adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
establishing facility zones and performance standards for public
facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 9808
requiring the processing of a local Facilities Management Plan,
and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9808 requires the Planning
Commission to hold a public hearing to consider the application
for a Local Facilities Plan and shall make recommendations and
findings for the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of
May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the Citj of Carlsbad as follows:
-136-
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A)
B)
That t~e above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at.the public hearing,
the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zo~e-4,-based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
Findings:
1)
2)
3 )
4)
5)
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 4 is
consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities
Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's
General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 4 is
consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities
and Improvements Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare
by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
-The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing
and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to
the provision of public facilities and improvements.
The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and
services are available in conformance with the adopted
performance standards.
Conditions:
1 )
Ill/
/Ill
Ill/
Ill/
/Ill
/Ill
/Ill
Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 4 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities
Management Plan Zone 4, dated May 20, 1987, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by reference.
Pt 1RESO"NO. 2659 -2-
-137-
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 20th day of May, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Schlehuber,
Schramm, Holmes, Hall.
NOES: Commissioners McFadden and McBane.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
MARY CUS, Chairman
CARLS D PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~Q~~ MICHAEL J .ZMl TR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2659 -3-
-138-
1
2
3
4
RESOLUTION NO. 9122
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 4.
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been
prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 4 in accordance with 5
6 Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 20, 1987, hold
8 duly noticed public hearings as required by law to consider said
9 plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted Resolution No.
10 2650 making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt a
ll plan; and
12 WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the ~lanning
\
13 Director on May 8, 1987 and approved by the Planning Commission
14 on May 20, 1987 indicating that the Local Facilities Management
15 Plan is not anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on
16 the environment; and
17
18
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of June 16,
1987 , held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all the
19 testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard,
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council.of the
21 City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
22
23
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Planning Commission in
24 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2659 constitute the findings of
25 the City Council.
26
27
28
3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 4
-139-
1 dated Hay 20, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
2 herein by reference is hereby approved. Any development
3 occurring within the boundaries of Zone 4 shall comply with all the
4 terms and conditions of said plan.
5 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 16th day of June 6 ----, 1987
7 by the following vote, to wit:
8
9
10
11
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
12
13 ATTEST:
14
NOES: None
ABSENT: None.
~: ;(~Y~et®ctERK
17 (SEAL)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
-140-