HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 05; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 05; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 5; 1987-06-17CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 5
Plan Sponsor:
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(61-9) 438-5621
Preparer:
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
June 17, 1987
I.
II.
III.
IV.
v.
VI.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Introduction •••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Builc:lout Projections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Phasing •••••••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Zone
and
Requirements for Public Facilities
Services .......................... . ........
Analysis of Public Facilities and Improvements
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1 o.
11 •
City Administrative Facilities •••••••••••••
Library ••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••
Wastewater Treatment Capacity.
Parks •••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drainage .......•.•......•........ . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy Findings
Circulation •••••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy findings
F 1 re .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ope_n Space •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •••••••••••••••••••••
Schools ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequacy Findings ••
Collection System. Sewer
Adequacy Findin~s ••
Distribution System. Water
Adequacy Findings ••••• . . ..............
Page No.
1
13
20
28
34
37
41
45
52
59
64
67
74
101
106
108
110
112
116
117
122
126
131
VII.
---
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Append ices •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 132
Appendix 1. -Glossary........................ 133
Appendix 2. -Growth Management Ordinance..... 140
Appendix 3. -Sources......................... 163
Appendix 4. -Existing Structures
Square footage.................. 165
Appendix 5. -Buildout Arterial
Improvements.................... 171
Appendix 6. -Existing Plus Committed Traffic
Projections for Impacted Road
Segments within Zone 5 ••••••••••• 180
Appendix 7. -Amended Cost Estimates for Impacted
Intersections.................... 187
Appendix 8. -Memo from Fire Department
Dated April 27, 1987 ••.•••••••••• 194
Appendix 9. -Memo from Parks and
Recreation Di rector.............. 201
Appendix 10. -Zone 5 Workforce Population Survey........................... 204
Appendix 11. -Plannin9 Commission Resolution
No. 2668......................... 209
-City Council
Resolution No. 9188 •••••••••••••• 213
ii
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
Page No.
local Facilities Management Plan................................. 2
Public Facilities Summary Sheet.................................. 6
Local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 5...................... 16
General Plan -Land Use Map...................................... 17
Zoning Map••··••••••••••••••••••••••·•··••••••·•·•••••••••·••·•• 18
Major Projects/Properties, Exhibit A............................. 19
Existing land Use Categories, Exhibit B.......................... 23
Existing Structural Square Footage, Exhibit C.................... 24
Approved Structural Square Footage, Exhibit D.................... 25
Future Potential Structural Square Footage, Exhibit E............ 26
Non-Residential Buildout Projections............................. 27
Non-Residential Phasing Exhibit F............................... 32
Non-Residential Phasing (Graph) Exhibit G........................ 33
City Administrative Facilities
Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 38
Summary Sheet. . . . . . • . . • • • . • • • . . • . • . • . • • . • • . . . • • • . . . • • . • • • • 39
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis................... 40
Library
~1ap. . . . • • . . • . • . • . . . • . • . • . . . • . . . • . . . • • • . • • • • . . • • • . • . • . . • • . • 42
Summary Sheet •••••..•.•••.•••••••.•••..••. • • . • • • . . . • . . • . • • . 43
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis................... 44
Wastewater Treatment
Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 46 Summary Sheet............................................. 47
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis................... 48
Service Area Demand and Treatment Capacity, Table 1....... 51
iii
--
Parks
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
PaQe No
Park District Boundary Map............................ 53
Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 54
Summary Sheet. • • . . . • . . . • . . . • . . . . • . . • . • . . . • . . • • • . • • • • . • 55
Special Considerations................................ 56
Drainage
Master Storm Drain Basins, Exhibit H.................. 60
Drainage, Exhibit 1................................... 61 Summary Sheet......................................... 62
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis............... 63
Circulation
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequa~y Analysis •••••••••••••••
Trip Distribution Map, Exhibit J ••••••••••••••••••••••
Circulation Improvements ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Levels of Service, Chart A ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Road Segments, Chart 6 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Failure Projections, Chart C ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Proposed Improvements •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•
-Palomar Airport Road/1-5, Exhibit K •••••••••••••••••
-El Camino Real/Kelly Dr, Exhibit L ••••••••••••••••••
-El Camino Real/Faraday, Exhibit M •••••••••••••••••••
-El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Road, Exhibit N ••••••
-El Camino Real/Tamarack Ave., Exhibit 0 •••••••••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/Paseo del Norte, Exhibit P •••••••
-Cannon Rd/El Camino Real, Exhibit Q •••••••••••••••••
-El Camino Real/College, Exhibit R •••••••••••••••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/College, Exhibit 5 •••••••••••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/El Fuerte, Exhibit T •••••••••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/Melrose, Exhibit U •••••••••••••••
-El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Rd., Exhibit V •••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/Yarrow, Exhibit W ••••••••..••••••
-El Camino Real/Faraday, Exhibit X •••••••••••••••••••
-Palomar Airport Rd/Paseo del Norte, Exhibit Y •••••••
Circulation Improvement Costs, Exhibit Z ••••••••••••••
iv
68
69
70
73
73a
76
77
78
82
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
100
Fire
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
Map ..................... _ ••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••
Summary Sheet •••••••.••••••••..••••••••••••••••.•••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••••••••••
Open Space
Schools
Summary Sheet .•••.•••••••.•••••••••••••.•••••••••.•••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••••••••••
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Sun1111ar)' St\eet •••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••••••••••••
Sewer Collection System
Sewer District Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••••••••••••
Sewer Demand, Exhibit M ••••••••••••..•••••••••.••••••.•
Carlsbad Demand in the Buena Interceptor and
San Marco Interceptor, Exhibit BB •••••••••••••••••••••
Water Distribution System
Page No
102
103
104
109
110
113
114
115
118
119
120
121
124
125
Water Service Boundary Map.............................. 127
Map..................................................... 128 Summary Sheet........................................... 129
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis................. 130
Appendices
Traffic Impact Fee •••.•••..••.•..•.••...•••.••.•••••••.•
Bridge & Thoroughfare District ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Circulation Improvements ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Circulation Improvements/Buildout •••••••••••••••••••••••
Failure Projections/Palomar Airport Rd
(Paseo del Norte to Camino Vida Roble) •••••••••••••••••
Failure Projections/Palomar Airport Rd.
(El Camino Real to East City Limit) ••••• ~ ••••••••••••••
Typical lane Improvements •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
V
138
139
174a
174b
182
183
193
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-2 -
City or ca,ttbaa
CirowlPI MeNlgement ProO"am
JANUARY 1987
-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 was
prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management program, Title
21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents
of the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110
of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 5 plan is
consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan,
and it implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986.
Zone 5 is different than most of the other 25 zones in
Carlsbad. There is no existing residential development within it,
nor will there be any future residential development within it. The
Zone 5 plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the
buildout projections for non-residential development within the
Zone. The plan then phases or estimates the Zone's development on a
yearly basis until buildout. The phasing is done to predict future
facility demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is
then analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and
proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing
for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a
financing plan that establishes various methods of funding
facilities and improvements that are identified by the plan as
needed. Since this Zone plan ls a. regulatory document, each
facility section also contains conditions to ensure that public
facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards. The
conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 5 approval, and
mandatory compliance will regulate future development within the
zone. It should be noted that some of the performance standards for
public facilities in the Citywide Growth Management Program are
based on residential population and are Aot applicable to Zone 5.
When this occurs they are listed as not applicable in the following
summary chart. Based on recommendations from the Parks and
Recreation Department and Fire Department, special non-residential
performance standards are being recommended for these two
facilities.
The purpose of the summary chart shown below is to provide
a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
5.
City Ad ■lnlstratlve
library
Wastewater
Treat ■ent Capacity
SUMMARY .CHART
Not applicable
Not applicable
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standards
-3-
-Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Zone 5 does not impact the adopted
performance standard because it is
based upon re~idential development.
However, staff is recommending a new
standard for Zone 5. This proposed
standard is discussed beginning on
Page 56.
Zone 5 complies with the adopted
performance standard. The drainage
_section does highlight items in sub-
basins 11 and 13 which will be
required when individual projects
are proposed in those areas of the
Zone.
Currently all intersections and road
segments within Zone 5, or impacted
by Zone 5 traffic meet the adopted
performance standard. With the
existing plus committed traffic im-
pacts, seven intersections dnd two
road segments are projected to fall
below the adopted performance stan-
dard. At buildout, nine inter-
sections are projected to fall below
the City's adopted performance
standard unless mitigating improve-
ments beyond those required under
the current circulation element are
installed.
Zone 5 does not impact the adopted
performance standard because it 1s
based upon residential development
However, staff is recommending a new
standard for Zone 5. This proposed
standard is discussed beginning on
Page 104. Because of the proposed
standard, most of the development
within Zone 5 cannot comply with the
second and third considerations of
proposed non-residential Fire
Service Performance Standard. It is
projected that by 1989 all three
components will not be complied with
and, therefore Fire Station 5 must
be constructed by early 1989 or all
development in Zone 5 will be
stopped.
-4-
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection
Syste11
Water Distribution
The Citywide Facilities and Im-
provements Plan as adopted by the
City Council in September 1981
indicated this Zone did not have to
address Open space in the local
plan.
Existing school facilities curtently
have the capacity to meet the
the anticipated demand generated by
Zone 5, that results from recent
legislation that allows parents to
enroll their children in schools in
the communities where the parent
works. The school district had in-
dicated that it will be able to
provide capacity to ·buildout of Zone
5.
Sewer service for Zone 5 currently
meets the performance standard.
However, with committed and future
development, there will be sewage
capacity deficits within certain
reaches of the Buena-San Marcos
Interceptor System. Prior to any
further development of land tribu-
tary to these reaches, additional
short and long term capacity shall
be developed. Adequate financial
mechanisms shall be developed to
secure construction of the South
Agua Hedionda Interceptor by 1995
prior to the approval of any addi-
tional development within basin 5B.
Water service to Zone 5 meets the
adopted performance standards to the
buildout of the Zone.
-5-
---
-
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET
Conformance with Adopted Standards
Citrwide Quadrant Zone 5
1) City Administrative Facilities N/A N/A N/A
2) Library N/A N/A N/A
·3) Wastewater Treatment Yes*** N/A*
4) Parks N/A N/A No**
5) Drainage· N/A N/A Yes
6) Circulation N/A N/A No**
7) Fire N/A N/A N/A*
8) Open Space N/A N/A Yes
9) Schools N/A N/A Yes
10) Sewer Collection System N/A N/A No**
11) Water Distribution System N/A N/A Yes
N/A = Not Applicable
* A new standard is being proposed for these facilities in Zone 5.
** These facilities do not conform with the adopted performance
standards. Mitigation to bring these facilities into conformance
are found in the next section "Special Conditions for Zone 5",
Pages 8 12 and are discussed in further detail in each
applicable Chapter.
*** Based on Council adoption of interim wastewater treatment
capacity policy.
-6-
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. All development within Zone 5 shall conform to the
provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
and to the provisions and conditions of this Local
Facilities Management Plan.
2. All development within Zone 5 shall be reQuired to pay a
public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the
City Council on April 22, 1986, and all other applicable
fees. Development in Zone 5 shall also be responsible for
any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that
are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the
adopted performance standard.
3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 5
pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 5 shall be in conformance with the
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City
Council Resolution 8797.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management
Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to
add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through
the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may
be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City
Council at anytime.
6. If a public facility or service is found to not be in
c~nformance with an adopted performance standard during the
yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be
immediately brought before the City Council. If the City
Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no
future building or development permits which would impact
the facility shall be issued until those facilities are
brought into conformance with the adopted performance
standard.
7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building
permits -or development permits will be allowed unless the
performance standards are complied with. This includes all
projects which were exempt under Section 21.90.030(c) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 5
' The following Special Conditions apply specifically to
development in Zone 5 and must be complied with in addition to
the General Conditions for Zone 5. These conditions are also
listed separately under the analysis discussion of each
facility.
City Administrative Facilities
Not applicable to this Zone.
Library
Not applicable to this Zone
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
The following actions shall be pursued by the City to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five
(5) year period.
Parks
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly
basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an
early warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment
plant Phase IV expansion to provide ad~quate
capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25 MGD,
actively seek leased capacity from other Encina
agencies.
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed to
activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment
Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost
effective treatment m~asures are no longer feasible
and Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached.
All non-residential development will be required to pay a
park-in-lieu fee of $.50 per square foot to be collected at the
time of building permit issuance.
Drainage
Prior to the issuance of further development permits
within drainage area 13 of Zone 5 the developers shall:
-8-
1) Pay or enter into an agreement with the City to pay
for a_ proportional share of the mitigation of the
downstream drainage problems associated with the
Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park in accordance with
the requirements of the future update to the Master
Drainage Plan.
2) Install the desiltation basin identified as a 2700
cubic yard basin at the north end of Master Drainage
Plan Facility "BL" (as shown in the Master Drainage
Plan).
Impacts along the Encinas Canyon drainage below Palomar Oaks Way,
along Palomar Airport Road shall be required to be mitigated by
the respective developers as development occurs.
Circulation
The following
implemented within four
years and total bulldout.
1-3 Years
circulation
phases of
improvements shall he
1-3 years, 4-6 years, 7-10
1. Palomar Airport Road, between Paseo del Norte and
Palomar Oaks Way shall be widened to 6 lanes by 1991.
2. Palomar
eastern
1991.
Airport Road
City limits
between El Camino Real to the
shall be widened to 4 lanes by
3. The following improvements will he required to be
implemented by 1991 in order to bring the Palomar
Airport Road/1-5 Interchange into conformance with the
adopted circulation performance standard.
I-5 Southbound at Palomai Airport Road
a) Restripe to provide two through lanes for eastbound and
westbound each and widen southbound off-ramp to provide
three lanes (one left only, one right only, and one
optional).
1-5 Northbound at Palomar Airport Road
b) Widen east and west approaches of Palomar Airport Road to
provide an additional through lane for each direction.
c) Both intersections of Palomar Airport Road at the I-5 off-
ramps shall be signaled and coordinated with the signals
at Paseo del Norte.
-9-
--4-6 Years
1. Widen El Camino Real at Kelly Drive to prime
arterial standards with signalization and separate
southbound right-turn lane.
7-10 Years
1. El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue -Modify the lane
usage pattern and improvements such that three
lanes can be provided in each north-south
direction. For the east-west approach, the lanes
shall be designated so that there is a right-turn
only and through plus left turn for each approach.
2. El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road -Add one
westbound lane along west side of Palomar Airport
Road (west of El Camino Real), add two westbound
lanes (east of El Camino Real), add one eastbound
lane, (east of El Camino Real), add one northbound
lane (north of Palomar Airport Road), add two
southbound lanes (north of Palomar Airport Road),
add one northbound lane (south of Palomar Airport
Road).
3. El Camino Real at Tamarack Boulevard -Add one
northbound lane along El Camino Real (north of
Tamarack intersection), add three northbound lanes
along El Camino Real (South of Tamarack Avenue).
4. Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte -Add one
westbound free right turn lane, one northbound
through lane and restripe and sign Palomar Airport
Road.
Total Buildout
1. Cannon Road at El Camino Real Install a
northbound to eastbound right-turn only lane.
2. El Camino Real at College Boulevard Add an
eastbound to northbound left turn lane, a westbound
to southbound left turn lane and provide a right
turn only and an optional right and through lane to
the westbound approach.
3. "El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue Add one
westbound right turn lane, add two eastbound right
turn lanes, add one northbound left turn lane, one
westbound turn lane and a southbound to westbound
right turn ramp.
-10-
,--.
Fire
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
-Add a Palomar Airport Road at College Boulevard
southbound to westbound right only lane, a
lane, an
1 ane and an
westbound to southbound left-turn
eastbound to southbound right only
eastbound to northbound left turn lane.
Palomar Airport Road at El Fuerte Add a
southbound to eastbound left turn lane, an
additional westbound to southbound left-turn lane
and an eastbound to southbound right-turn only
lane.
Palomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive -Add a left-
turn lane on each approach and an eastbound to
southbound right-turn only lane.
Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte -Widen the
westbound approach to provide a separate right-turn
only lane and widen the northbound approach to
provide two left turn only lanes. Signals shall
also be installed for the westbound approach to
channel drivers into the proper lanes.
El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road -Add one
eastbound left turn lane.
9. Palomar Airport Road at Yarrow/McClellan Drive -
Add a westbound left-turn lane and restripping the
northbound through lane for an optional through
plus a right-turn lane.
The construction schedule for the Fire Station No. 5 shall
be required to be accelerated so that construction will begin in
1988 with an opening date projected for early 1989.
Open Space
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Schools
No special conditions are necessary at this ime.
Sewer Collection System
1 ) to any development tributary to Reach 2 Interceptor
additional short and long term capacity shall be
through a lease of additional capacity from the
Prior
System,
developed
-11-
Buena Sanitation District and securing construction of a
collection line paralleling the reach. If leasing is only
temporary, the parallel line will be required by the year
2000. If the Buena Sanitation District will not lease
additional capacity, the new reach of line will be
required by 1989 and no development should be allowed that
would exceed capacity.
2. Reach 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Buena-San Marcos Interceptor
System will not meet the adopted performance standard at
buildout of Zone 5. At the time that these lines reach
capacity, additional interceptor lines will be required or
additional capacity in the major interceptors acquired.
The timing of these improvements will be determined
through the update of the City's Sewer Master Plan.
3. Adequate financial mechanisms should be developed to
secure construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor
from El Camino Real to the Enuna Water Central Facility by
1995 prior to approval of additional development.
Water Distribution System
All development within Zone 5 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District Fees.
-12-
13
INTRODUCTION
-
,-
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Local Facility Management Plan is to
complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management Plan
for Zone 5 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the Growth
Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan based upon a phased buildout of the City's
existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities
analysis, the City has been separated into 25 Local Facilities
Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan
Boundaries", on Page 2.
PLAN OVERVIEW
This plan for Zone 5 provides a detailed description and
analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its
current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and
when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order
to accommodate developm~nt within the Zone (phasing). The plan
also provides a complete description of how each facility ·and
improvement will be financed when mitigation is necessary.
The body of the plan is divided into separate ,sections for
each public facility. In each section there will be a summary
sheet which highlights the important information described in the
analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories:
Existing, Existing plus Approved, and Future. The demand column
in each of these categories will show two numbers:
Demand
The top number (1) represents -the Citywide, Quadrant or
Zone demand, depending upon the public facility being evaluated.
The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the
public facility, i.e., in this case, Zone 5.
Following the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis
and additional information for each public facility. If a
facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard,
there will be a discussion describing this situation, a
mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion.
Each facility subsection will conclude with a sub-section,
"Adequacy Findings". This section will summarize whether or not
the public facility conforms with the adopted performance
standard.
-14-
--ZONE 5 -OVERVIEW
The plan· for
Citywide Facilities
adopted performance
development occurs.
Zone 5 is consistent with all aspects of the
and Improvement Plan and ensures that the
standards shall be complied with as
Local Facilities Management Zone 5 is located within the
center of Carlsbad at ·the _intersection of the City's four
quadrants. The Zone is generally bounded by Interstate 5 on the
west, and the City's eastern boundary on the east. The Zone is
bisected east to west by Palomar Airport Road and north to south
by El Camino Real. Zone 5 consists of 2,360.6 acres of land
which slopes upward -to the north from Palomar Airport Road.
Palomar Airport (235 acres) is located within the center
of the Zone. The predominant remainder of Zone 5 is designated
and zoned for industrial/office uses. There are no residentially
designated and zoned properties in Zone 5. Approximately one-
fifth of the Zone is already built-out with industrial uses.
The Map, "General Pl~n Land Use", shown on Page 17,
denotes the General Plan Land Use for Zone 5. The accompanying
Land Use Zoning· is shown on the , "Z on 1 n g" map , on Page 1 8 •
Exhibit A, "Major Projects/Property Owners" ls shown on Pag.e 19.
-15-
ZONE 5
I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
...... ....
RRI
RRE
RS
C
N
TS
0 CBD
Pl
G u IIC
E
J ff p
OS NRR
C:OMMIRCIAL
INTENSl\"E REGIONAL RET.\ll ( ~ Plau Camino lttal)
::~.~~~:-s~~~:~;AL RETAIL (q. Car Counrrr Carlsbad)
COMMl:NITY COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
TIL\VEL SfR\'ICES COMMERCIAL
PROFESSIONAL REL\TED CENTRAL B\,'SINESS DISTIUCT PLANNED INOl 1STRIAL
GOVERNAIENT FACILITIES
l't!BLIC UTILITIES
RECREATION COMMEIICIAL
SC:HOOLS
ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH
.HIGH SCHOOL PRIVATE
OPEN SPACE
NON RESIDENTIAL RESERVE
ZONE 1J ~·-·-·-·-·-·--1
ZONE.I.
ZONE 5
)
ZONE 8
ZONE 20
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
GENERAL PLAN
ZONE 16
I
ZONE 17
ZONE 10
JANUARY 1887
I-'
00
I
RESIDENTIAL
P·C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE
R·A Rf.Sll)ENTIAL ACiRJCIJLn'RAL ZONE
R·E Rl1RAL R!SIDEri..TIAt f.STATE Zt )NE R· I ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZOl'iF.
R·2 T'IU·FAMILY RESIOEITTIAI. ZOSf
R·3 MULTIPLE FA.MII.Y RESIDENTIAi. /.ONE R-3L UMITEU MULTI-FAMILYllf.SIDF:l\'lHJ. ZONE RO-M llESll>ENTIAL DENSJTI'•Ml!I.TIPIJ: 7,( IN[
RD-H RESIDENTIAL OENSJn',fllGII zo,-;r
RMHP RF.IIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARS 1, !NE R·P RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL ZONE
KT RESIDENTIAL TOURIST ZONE
RW RESIDENTIAL WATERWAY ZONE
COMMERCIAL
0 OFFlCE ZONE
C· l NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
C-2 GENERAL COMMERc:IALlONE
C•T COMMERCIAL-IDURIST ZONE
C·M IIEA\'Y COMMERCIAL-LIMITED INDIJSllUAI. ZONE
M INDUSTillAL ZONE
P,M PLANNED INDUSllUAL ZONE
OTHH
f.p nooDPWNOVERUYZONE
L-C LIMITED CONTROL OS OPEN SPACE
ZONE 1.l
ZONE 4
ZONE 5
·-·-·-·-
ZONE 8
LOCAL FACILITIES
)
MANAGEMENT PLAN
M-0
I
I
\ ·-·-·•
OS
ZONE 10
ZONE 16
ZONE 17
ZONING
Cl!Jol'C•ltob■d
G,111.-,111,1.,,.~,.,.,.,Pl-0111■"'
JANUARY 11187
,_.
\0
ZONE 1.l
MACARIO
PARK
ZONE8
I ...... -,..,
PALOMAR
LAND GROUP
I ,._,_,. -.... I
I
I
I
COLLEGE BUSINESS PARK
:··-·-·-·-·-·•-" I ECK E
ZONE 5
LAUREL
TREE
ZONE 20
UKEGAWA
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
)
MAJOR PROJECTS/PROPERTIES
GATEWAY
PALOMAR
TECH
CENTER \
CARLSBAD SAFETY
•••••••yCENTER
~ ZONE 16
I
I
KAISER
ZONE 10
m
X
:I:
~ jjj ~ ~
-JANUARY 1187
20
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
-
II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PROJECTIONS
To adequately assess and plan for public facilities and
services in Zone 5, it is necessary to project the level of
development th~t can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of
this Zone. Buildout projections for Zone 5 are used to determine
existing industrial and commercial land uses and to assess the
ultimate potential that may be reached at the time Zone 5 is
built out. The ultimate buildout of-Zone 5 has been approxifflated
by examining: ·
1. The amount of existing land use,
2. The amount of approved, yet_ undeveloped land uses, and
3. The vacant land which can still be developed.
All major Zone 5 projects or properties referenced in this
section of the plan are shown on Exhibit A on Page 19.
The methodology used to compile the buildout projections
is consistent with that used in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan. Assumptions are described below:
A. Existing Land Uses
B.
Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the
acreage of each land use category within Zone 5. Field
checks and subsequent research ascertained how each
parcel within Zone 5 was actually being utilized as well
as the square footage of existing commercial or
industrial structures. The following Exhibits detail
this information:
Exhibit B, "Existing Land Use Categories", Page 23.
Exhibit C, "Existing Structural Square Footage", on
Page 24.
Appendix 4, "Existing Structural Square Footage."
Approved But Undeveloped Land
Exhibit D, "Approved Structural Square Footage" on
Page 25 includes a summary of projects that are
currently unbuilt but already have approved final maps,
site development plans, planned industrial permits or
planned unit developments as of January 1, 1987. These
listed projects have received discretionary approval by
the Planning Commission and/or City Council and only
require building permits. The building· square footage
per project included on Exhibit D was calculated by
taking the net developable acreage of each project, and
assuming that every net developable acre would result in
a maximum square footage yield of 40%.
-21-
C. Vacant Land
for purposes of determining the ultimate (future
potential buildout of Zone 5, all vacant properties and
projects with only approved tentative maps were
inventoried. Tentative Maps were included within this
"Future" classification because these projects still
require Final Map approval by the City Council. Exhibit
E, "Future Potential Structural Square footage", on Page
26 includes a summary of all properties within Zone 5
that are either (1) currently vacant or (2) only have
approved tentative maps over them. The building square
footage per vacant property or projects with only
approved tentative maps was calculated by taking the
gross acreage of each property, deducting the
·constraints and assuming that every developable acre
would result in a maximum square footage yield of 30%.
The following chart summarizes the square footage
information shown on Exhibits "B" -"E".
INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL TOTAL
Existing 4,223,177 33,432 4,256,609
Approved 8,658,422 886,881 9,545,303
Future Potential 7,989,279 405,108 8,394,387
Total 20,870,878 1,325,421 22,196,299
-22-
EXHIBIT B
ZONE 5
EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use
category within Zone 5.
General Plan
Land Use Designation
Commercial:
C
RC
TS
RS
Community
Recreation
Travel Services
Regional Service
Industrial:
PI
Other:
G
u
05
MAJ
MIN
COL
Planned Industrial
Governmental Facility
Public Utilities
Open Space
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
Cross
Acres
61.42
14.6
10.48
10.00
1,719.9
254.7
4.9
68.2
118.0
48.7
49.7
TOTAL ACREAGE 2,360.6
-23-
ZONE 5
EXISTINC STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTACE
SQUARE FEET
Project Name Industrial/Office
Palomar Business Park
Carlsbad Research Center
Palomar Tech Center
Birtcher Business Center
Beckman Instruments
Faraday Business Park
City Safety Center
Cable Vision
Palomar Airport
Palomar Solid Waste Transfer Station
Costa Real Municipal Water District
Olympic Resort
2,525,725
984,568
156,440
187,818
127,200
36,645
63,376
17,720
76,775
37,410
9,500
4,223,177
-24-
Commercial
33,432.
33,432
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT D
ZONE 5
APPROVED STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
Listed below are projects with approximated square footage
yield, which are currently unbuilt.
SQUARE FEET
Project City
Name File No. Industrial/Office Commercial
Airport Business Center CT 81-46 2,554,359 372,873
Carlsbad Research Center CT 81-10 1,282,388 130,680
Carlsbad Airport Business Center CT 74-21
Kaiser 1,203,475 191,664
T & G Investments 1,254,005 191,664
Birtcher Business Center CT 82-4 93,915
Palomar Business Park CT 79-1 568,893
Carlsbad Gateway Center SOP 84-5 230,300
Beckman Instruments SOP 80-1 148,800
lnteramerican Development SDP 83-2 60,160
Palomar Airport Plaza SDP 86-4 62,609
City Safety Center CUP-262 74,000
Eaton Leonard PIP 85-2 176,800
Birtcher Business Center PIP 84-8 . 116,622
Kaiser Center PIP 85-7 176,760
McNary/White PIP 86-4 17,046
Andrex Development CT 80-47 139,200
McRoskey PUD-68 98,320
Kelly MS-696 400,770 ---
TOTAL 8,658,422 886,881
-25-
EXHIBIT E
-
ZONE 5
FUTURE POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTACE
SQUARE FEET
Project Name/ Net*
Proeert~ Owner Acres Industrial/Office Commercial
Ecke 26 339,768
McReynolds 24 313,632
Fox 43 564,537
County 105 1,365,606
Palomar Land Group 14 181,645
Hughes 30 392,040
Laurel Tree 5 60,113
Ivar 16 209,088
Ukegawa 12 155,378
Aladray .27 3,528
Beckman 26 337,807
Frazee 12 159,429 -College Business Park CT 85-17 85.3 1,114,700 111,078
Carlsbad Research Center 2,692,008 294,030
(Phases III -IV) CT 85-24 206
Safety Center (City Hall) 100,000
7,989,279 405,108
*Constraints already deducted
-26-
-BUILDOUT POPULATION PROJECTION
Zone 5 does not include within its' boundaries any
residential uses. In accordance, no additional residential
population will be generated within it. However, for purposes of
public facilities analysis, a Zone 5 workforce population survey
for existing conditions was conducted by staff. The survey (See
Appendix 10) indicates that there currently exists a workforce
population of approximately 7,820 people within Zone 5. This
averages out to 1 person (employee) per 544 square feet of
existing building area within Zone 5. Assuming that this
employee generation factor remains constant through buildout of
the Zone, the Zone will include approximately 40,800 people at
full buildout. This figure is based on the existing ratio of
employees to building square footage. This could change
significantly in the future but staff believes this is a good
starting point for analyzing the impact the Zone's workforce will
have upon public facilities. A change could occur because many
industrial parks replace manufacturing and warehousing uses with
research/development and office uses as they mature. Both of
these uses require significantly more people per square feet then
do manufacturing and warehousing uses as updates occur to this
plan staff will cQntinue to monitor workforce population within
Zone 5.
Non Residential
The non-residential buildout projection for Zone 5 was
determined by totaling the existing, approved and potential
future square footage by use category. Building permit files
were researched to determine the existing square footage.
Approved structural square footage was calculated by multiplying
the net developable acreage of approved final maps by 40%.
Future structural square footage was calculated by multiplying
the gross acres of vacant property or property with only an
approved tentative map by 301. The non-residential buildout
breakdown, therefore is as follows:
Existing
Approved
Future
Total
SQUARE FOOTAGE
lndustrial/O~fice
4,223,177
8,658,422
7,989,279
20,870,878
-27-
Commercial
33,432
886,881
405,108
1,325,421
Total
Square Feet
4,256,609
9,545,303
8,394,387
22,196,299
28
PHASING
. -
III. PHASINC -AN OVERVIEW
It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule. of
development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the·
25 Local Facility Management Zones for the purpose of:
1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a
yearly basis; and
2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a
public facility is needed; and
3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital
Improvement Program budget.
Because Zone 5 includes no residential uses within its
boundaries, phasing of dwelling units over time will not be
discussed. Zone 5 is predominated by industrial and commercial
uses. In accordance, the phasing discussion for this Zone will
deal exclusively with non-residential uses.
In the Citywide Plan, phasing of industrial development
was not discussed. For purposes of discussing the phasing of
industrial development within this non-residential zone, City
industrial building permit records and project specific marketing
studies were reviewed to come up with a "best guess" phasing
scenario of industrial development.
In each Local Plan a key element will be the projected
phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These
schedules are presented for the purpose of establishing
thresholds for demand and future demands for public facilities.
By projecting these future public facility and improvement
demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital
Improvement Budget to assure they are in place as development
occurs. The phasing schedule is not presented to establish a
rate of growth within the City. It will be used to assure that
growth occurs only as public facilities are available to ensure
compliance with the adopted performance standards.
The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan is
provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were
discussed above. These projections have been established by
reviewing development in the pipeline which have tentative and
final maps as well as applications pending. The same type of
phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series VII for the entire
City and will be utilized to review phasing projections presented
in this and other local plans to determine the overall impact on
public facilities and services •
-29-
Zone 5 -Phasing Schedule
Phasing for Zone 5 incorporates the Citywide projections
as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized
circumstances include:
1. The amount and type of developing projects:
-Final Maps
-Tentative Maps
-Applications Pending
2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential.
3. The amount of development that can be reasonably
absorbed into the market.
The specific phasing schedule for Zone 5 is shown on Pages
32 and 33. As shown on_ Exhibit C, "Existing Structural Square
Footage", on Page 24, there currently exists 4,223,177 square
feet of industrial building space and 33,432 square feet of
commercial within Zone 5. The schedule assumes the Zone will be
completely built out by 2013. The schedule phases those projects
identified in the developing process (which includes all projects
with approved final maps) beginning in 1987 through 1996. This
assumption is based on the fact that Zone 5 already has in excess
--of 9,000,000 square foot approved for development. Based upon
historical records it is not anticipated that the City could
absorb more than 1,000,000 square foot per year. During this
time period, a total of 8,658,422 square feet of industrial and
886,881 square feet of commercial building space will be built in
Zone 5 (See Exhibit D).
The phasing schedule assumes that the Zone's vacant land
or projects with only a tentative map approved will be developed
beginning in 1997 and phased through the buildout of the Zone
(See Exhibit E). In all, a total of 20,870,878 square feet of
industrial building space and 1,325,421 square feet of commercial
building space will exist at the buildout of Zone 5.
Phasing Summary
It is estimated that the rema1n1ng non-residential
development in Zone 5 will build out by 2013. This phaslnq
scenario assumes that the already approved industrial/
office/commercial projects (See Exhibit D, Page 25) will build
out first, with an anticipated completion date of 1996. Future
industrial/office/commercial development (See Exhibit E, on Page
26) will build out between the years 1997 and 2013 (average of
around 493,788 square feet/year). The peak non-residential
growth period within Zone 5 ls approximated between the years
1987 and 1996. During these years, development could reach close
__ to 954,530 square feet per year.
-30-
The specific phasing of Zone 5 is presented for the
purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for
public facilities. It is impossible to predict the exact way
development will occur in this Zone or in the City, but through
these phasing proje~tions the City will be able to establish a
direct link between development and the need for public
facilities. This link will allow the City to ensure compliance
with the adopted performance standards at all times as growth
occurs. And if compliance is not maintained, development will be·
stopped until it conforms with the adopted performance
standards.
-31-
EXHIBIT F
-
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5
NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING
----------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR YEARLY TOTAL YEARLY TOTAL CUMMULATIVE
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SQ.FT.
SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. TOTAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------1976 244,500 244,500 0 0 244,500
E 1977 397,868 642,368 0 0 642,368
X 1978 397,868 1,040,235 0 0 1,040,235
I 1979 397,868 1,438,103 0 0 1,438,103
s 1980 397,868 1,835,971 0 0 1,835,971
T 1981 397,868 2,233,839 0 0 2,233,839
I 1982 397,868 2,631,706 0 0 2,631,706
N 1983 397,868 3,029,574 0 0 3,029,574
G 1984 397,868 3,427,442 0 0 3,427,442
1985 397,868 3,825,309 33,432 33,432 3,858,741
----1986 397,868 4,223,177 0 33,432 4,256,609
1987 865,842 5,089,019 88,688 122,120 5,211,139
A .1988 865,842 5,954,861 88,688 210,808 6,165,670
p 1989 865,842 6,820,704 88,688 299,496 7,120,200
p 1990 865,842 7,686,546 88,688 388,184 8,074,730
R 1991 865,842 8,552,388 88,688 476,873 9,029,261
0 1992 865,842 9,418,230 88,688 565,561 9,983,791
V 1993 865,842 10,284,072 88,688 654,249 10,938,321
E 1994 865,842 11,149,915 88,688 742,937 11,892,851
D 1995 865,842 12,015,757 88,688 831,625 12,847,382
----1996 865,842 12,881,599 88,688 920,313 13,801,912
1997 469,958 13,351,557 23,830 944,143 14,295,699
1998 469,958 13,821,514 23,830 967,973 14,789,487
1999 469,958 14,291,472 23,830 991,803 15,283,274
2000 469,958 14,761,429 23,830 1,015,633 15,777,062
F 2001 469,958 15,231,387 23,830 1,039,462 16,270,849 u 2002 469,958 15,701,345 23,830 1,063,292 16,764,637
T 2003 469,958 16,171,302 23,830 1,087,122 17,258,424
u 2004 469,958 16,641,260 23,830 1,110,952 17,752,212
R 2005 469,958 17,111,217 23,830 1,134,782 18,245,999
E 2006 469,958 17,581,175 23,830 1,158,612 18,739,787
2007 469,958 18,051,132 23,830 1,182,442 19,233,574
2008 469,958 18,521,090 23,830 1,206,272 19,727,362
2009 469,958 18,991,048 23,830 1,230,101 20,221,149
2010 469,958 19,461,005 23,830 1,253,931 20,714,937
2011 469,958 19,930,963 23,830 1,277,761 21,208,724
2012 469,958 20,400,920 23,830 1,301,591 21,702,512
2013 469,958 20,870,878 23,830 1,325,421 22,196,299 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
32
)
24
22
20
18
16
I-w 14 w,,....., u.. (/J
C:
W 0 12 Cl'.'.= w <( ·-
w :::J 2 a...__, 10 If)
8
6
4
2
0
1976
)
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5
1980
D
NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING
,825,309
388,184
1985 1990
INDUSTRIAL
12,015,757
831,625 1,015,633 1,134,782
1995
YEARS
+
2000 2005
COMMERCIAL
20,87 ,878
1,325,421
2013 m
)( :c -m --f
G)
34
ZONE
REQUIREMENTS
---
IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
The Management Plan for Zone 5 addresses eleven separate
facilities:
1. City Administrative Facilities
2. library
3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity
4. Parks
5. Drainage
6. Circulation
7. Fire
8. Open Space
9. Schools
10. Sewer Collection System
11. Water Distribution System
Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine
conformance with the adopted performance standard. The
evaluation will be made in three stages based on existin~ demand,
approved or committed demand, and fvture demand at buildout.
For each of these facilities and services the following is
provided:
1. An illustrative map showing what is existing and what
will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate
buildout;
2. Dictrict boundary maps where facilities are provided
by special districts (i.e., school, water, sewer).
3. Adopted service level performance standards which must
be complied with at all times as growth occurs; and
4. A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis for
each of the public facilities and services.
5. A list of special
ensure conformance
standard.
conditions
with the
for each facility to
adopted performance
·6. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing
mechanisms relevant to each facility.
The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative
Facilities, library, and Wastewater ·Treatment, have been analyzed
in th~ Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These will
also be included in the Local Facilities Management Plan to show
compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance with
the adopted standard.
-35-
-In any case, ~his analysis will show how each of the
adopted performance standards will be complied with as
development occurs within the City, quadrant, and zone. This
plan includes financing of all public facilities and services
where non-conformance with the standard requires mitigation. It
also includes a complete phasing schedule for all development
within the zone.
-36-.
37
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
FACILITIES
ZONE 5
LOCAL
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
• CITY ADMINISTIIATION-:EXl8TING
Q CITY ADMINISTIIATION•PLANNED
I
' I ' I
I
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-38 -
POLICE CENTER
JANUARY 1887
BUILDOUT
LOCAL FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION · DEMAND SUPPLY (Ca.lui11..wce w/9tal:iard) MIT/GA TION FUNDING
EXISTING * * YES N/A N/A
* * YES APPROVED N/A N/A
*
C, z -rn
<
J: a.
FUTURE
* * YES N/A N/A
Zone 5, as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
will conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the
Zone builds out.
,..39_
,_..
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be schedul~d
for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Zone 5 is comprised exclusively of industrial and
commercial uses. Because the adopted performance standard deals
specifically with residential land uses and not with non-
residential, it is concluded that this zone currently and at
buildout meets the performance standard for this facility.
The City has considered creating a City Administrative
Facilities performance standard for non-residential uses.
However, it is staff's conclusion that the Public Facilities Fees
required to be paid by all non-residential uses, are adequate to
meet the associated City Administrative Facility demands created
by these uses. In accordance, no new performance standard or fee
requirement is suggested.
-40-
41
LIBRARY
-
ZONE 5
LOCAL
,
' I
I J ,
I I
LIBR·ARY
\ CAIAVE•A
'[o< ZONE 5
■ L•IINIE8-EXIIITIHO
D LIBIIAAIH~NNED
I \
' ( ' ~ ',~,,. ,,_ .. ' ,,. ........ ;"'
' ✓ '✓
/'
,/ \
'~o ,,-" \~
' , ... ---" I G_.',,
\
I I
1< ,e
, .... -(o -.---.
COS I A
Ollvf ""'"'-" 'N
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-!J2 -
I \ ' ..... ' --.........
' \
\ I I
Cffy ol C.,l9be0
G,owth ~ Pu9affl
5
JANUARY 1887
BUILDOUT
LOCAL.FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-zone ·5
.LIBRARY
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cantotn•ic» w/9taidard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING * * YES N/A N/A
* * APPROVED YES N/A N/A
*
C, z -Cl)
< ::c a.
FUTU.RE
* * YES N/A N/A
Zone 5, as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
will conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the
Zone builds out.
-43-
--LIBRARY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be
scheduled for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY AHALYSIS
Zone 5 is comprised exclusively of industrial and
commercial uses. Because the adopted performance standard deals
specifically with residential land uses and not with non-
residential, it is concluded that this zone currently and at
buildout meets the performance standard for this facility.
The City ~as considered creating a Library performance
standard for non-residential uses. However, it is the conclusion
of the Library Director and staff that the Public Facilities Fees
required to be paid by all non-residential uses are adequate to
meet the associated Library demands created by these uses. In
accordance, no new performance standard or fee requirement is
suggested.
-44-
45
WASTEWATER
ENCINA
,.-WASTEWATER
T·REATMENT
PLANT
-ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-46 -
WASTEWATER
t
CilyolC_,_
Growffl ............ lll'Gp'am
-JANUARY 1987
-
BUILDOUT
LOCAL-FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
Carlsbad Service Area
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CcdOln•ice wlStlniard) MITIGATION FUNDING
4.7
EXISTING 5.7 NO SEE PAGE 50 SEE MGD PAGE
a
6.6d
APPROVED 8.6b,d YES. N/A N/A
MGD
C, ---z -U)
c(
::c 7-.7c
l:L
FUTURE 8.6c,d YES N/A N/A
MGD ---
a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service area which
includes Zone 5. The following analysis of a citywide facility,
therefore, focuses on the entire sewer service area, and not just on
Zone 5. ·
b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Enclna.
c. Demand and Supply, as of 1995.
d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991.
-47-
50
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year
period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
separate and independent agencies, Leucadia County Water
District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of
Carlsbad.
Sewer service for Zone 5 is provided entirely by the City
of Carlsbad.
1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area):
Wastewater Treatment Demands
Carlsbad
Population
Current Buildout
40,356 95,669
* EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units
EDU*
CurrentBuildout
21,354 47,800
MGD**
Current Buildout
4.7 11.8
** MGD -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF)
2. Existing Facilities
The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two
treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity is
provided through the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility
(WPCF) which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies.
The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MGD of which -
Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD).
The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera
Hills Treatment Plant which has a .capacity of 1.2 MGD. The
Calavera Facility ls not operational at this time and will
require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it
functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated
to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina
WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant
is not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the
absence of needed capacity at Enclna.
-48-
3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital
Improvements Program:
The ddopted CIP includes two items which will be financed
from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity:
B.
a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin
in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000
Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 MGD.
b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the
1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to
correspond to capacity needs.
Phasing and Service Demand
Based on data maintained by the City Development
Processing Services Department, on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's
had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 GPO per EDU and
the adopted 3% vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be
issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the
Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on
phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non-
residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion
of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual
growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and
238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would
indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be
exceeded within a year.
Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's
wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow
value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent
dwelling units (EDU's) were connected and being billed by the
City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU's has
been measured at 4.69 MGD. That flow divided by the currently
billed EDU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day
(GPU) per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of
Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate of 246 GPO per EDU. Evaluation
of available capacity varies significantly depending on the value
of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page
51, utilizing 220 GPO per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF
would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be
completed in 1991.
c. Adequacy Findings
Based. on analysis of existing flow data and a range of
projections it is likely that current treatment capacity will be
reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim
capacity will be required to meet the performance standard.
Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would
allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet
-49-
the performance standard. These alternatives are incorporated
into the proposed special conditions outlined in the following
Mitigation section.
III.
A.
B.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 5
1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity
throughout a five (5) year period:
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a
monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and
to have an early warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of
treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide
adequate capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25
MGD, actively seek leased capacity from other
Encina agencies.
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD,
proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills
Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be
activated when more cost effective treatment
measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad
capacity at Encina has been reached.
Financing
Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of
funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment
plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the
mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy
of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash
flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction with the
Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a
basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and
each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be
given to wastewater treatment capacity.
-50-
ill!
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
U1 .... 1992
1993
1994
1995
FLOW PROJECTIONS1
EQUIVALENT DWEL(ING FLOW i 220
TABLE 1
CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND
AND
AVAILABLE VASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
FLOW iii 246
UNITS CEDU'S) GAL/EDU (MGD )2 GAL/EDU (MGD) ENCINA (MGD)
21,354 4.69 5.25 5. 71
23,3843 5 .14 5.75 5. 71
24,492 5.40 6.03 5. 71
25,600 5.63 6.29 5. 71
26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57
27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57
28,924 6.36 7.12 8.57
30,032 6.60 7.38 8.57
31, 140 6.85 7.66 8.57
TREATMENT CAPACITY
LAKE CALAVERA
HILLS CMGD) TOTAL (MGQ)
0.0 5. 71
0.6 6.31
0.7 6.41
0.7 6.41
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU's are expanded 1,143 per year. This represents 905 dwelling units and 238 EDU's of
commercial and industrial. (428,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year is projected to
July 1 to correspond to fiscal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy.
2 MGD = Millions of Gallons Per Day
3 1988 EDU'S • 22,965 EDU'S issued 3·31·87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy
(22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 a 23,384
52
PARKS
-
-ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-53 -
PARK DISTRICTS
ir
Caty of C•labe(3
G,owth Mar\llOlmM Program
-JANUARY 1987
ZONE 5
LAG
RIVIERA
. --( •;'~2."'--
A-~ -A Fil, ~
COMMUNITY PARKS
0 EXISTING
• FUTURE
* SPECIAL USE AREA
• -------.... --lN
I \ ,, __ ---.... ' G◄ ... ',
\
''-(o --.---
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-54 -
PARKS
CH
Clly of C•tllltecl
Growrh "'-oem..r Program
JANUARY 1887
BUILDOUT
LOCAL -FACILITIES MAN-AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
PARKS
ZONE 5
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Calb,-m w18t■mrd) MITIGATION FUNDING
* * * *
EXtllfjNG
** ** ** **
APPROVED
C, z -"' < ~
Q. ** ** ** ** FU TU-RE
* Based on the existing performance standard. No ·park acreage is
required for this non-residential zone.
** Staff is proposing a park-in-lieu fee be implemented for all non-
residential development in Zone 5 at $.50 per square foot of
development.
-55-
*
**
**
PARKS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per
1,000 population within a Park District, must be scheduled for
construction within a five year period.
Special Considerations
Zone 5 does not include any residential uses, but is
instead composed exclusively of non-residential uses. The Growth
Management Program does not identify a Parks performance standard
for non-residential uses. Currently, non-residential uses are
required to pay Public Facilities Fees. A percentage of all
·Public Facilities Fees collected are allocated for the
construction and improvements to City parks. Non-residential
uses are however, not required to pay Park-In-Lieu fees, which
have historically been utilized for the purchase of park land.
Zone 5 is located within Park Districts 1-3. At full
buildout of Zone 5, there will be approximately 22,000,000 square
feet of non-residential building area. This structural square
footage corresponds to a potential average workday population
within the Zone of at least 40,000 people. In view of this
potential number of people being located within Zone 5 on a daily
basis, the Director of Parks and Recreation believes there is a
need for park facilities within Zone 5 (see Appendix 9). These
park facilities should include active recreational facilities.
In accordance, staff recommends that a Parks performance standard
be adopted for non-residential uses within Zone 5.
Listed and discussed below are four alternative Parks
performance standards which_ may be applied to non-residential
uses within Zone 5. A staff recommendation for a preferred parks
performance standard will follow.
1. Park-In-Lieu fees shall be required to be paid for
all non-residential development. This fee shall be
established at a rate of $.50 per square foot of non-
residential building areai and shall be utilized for
the purchase .of park land within Zone 5. The fee
shall apply to all projects or properties that d~ not
as yet have building permits. Implementation of this
fee will result in the potential allocation of
approximately $8,969,845 for the purchase of park
facilities. Construction of the park(s) will remain
dependent upon the allocation of Public Facilities
Fee funds. These new funds will be earmarked for
Zone 5 and their specific use will be determined when
the Parks and Recreation Element ls revised. T~e
element ls currently being updated.
-56-
2. Non-residential uses in Zone 5 shall be required to
pay a special parks fee tQ be utilized to initiate
development of Macario Canyon Park, which ls located
immediately north of and adjacent to Zone 5. The
rate of this fee shall be $.50 per square foot of
non-residential building area and shall apply to all
projects or properties that do not as yet have
building permits. This fee.will result in a similar
allocation of funds as the first alternative does.
3. Require that four separate areas (active recreational
parks) each totaling 3 acres in area, be developed
within Zone 5. The first active recreational park
shall be required to be constructed within one year
of approval of this Zone Plan (in 1998). The second,
third and fourth active recreational parks shall be
required to be constructed by 1993, 2002 and 2013,
respectively. This phasing of park facilities would
ensure that a 3 acre park is available for
approximately every 5,500,000 structural square feet
of non-residential development within Zone 5. With
this alternative, the propertx owners/developers
within the Zone would be responsible for allocating
property for and fully developing the parks. The
specific location of each park site would be closely
associated with the major ongoing and anticipated
concentrations of development within the Zone.
4. This alternative entails a hybrid of alternatives 1,
2 and 3, whereby, the property owners/developers
within Zone 5 shall be required to; (1) pay a park
fee at a rate of $.50 per sq. ft. of non-residential
building area and (2) create four separate areas
(active recreation parks) within Zone 5 which shall
be operated as active parks until Macario Canyon Park
is open for active recreational uses. The park fee
shall apply to all projects or properties that do not
as yet have building permits. Similar to alternative
3, each temporary active recreation park shall be
required to be 3 acres in area and shall be located
relative to concentrations of development within the
Zone.
At the time that Macario Canyon Park ls open for
active recreational uses, the four Zone 5 temporary
park sites may be phased out and developed with
industrial uses. The separate park fees that are
collected may be allocated for ei~her the purchase of
parks within Zone 5 or the fee may be used to improve
Macario Canyon Park.
-57-
-
Staff is recommending as part of this Zone Plan, that alternative
No. 1 be adopted as a Performance Standard for non-residential
development in Zone 5. This alter·native provides the greatest
amount of flexibility, yet still assures that park facilities
will be provided in a timely manner.
Special Conditions
Staff is recommending that a park-in-lieu fee of $.50 per
foot of non-residential be collected at the time of
permit issuance, to be used for park facilities within
square
building
Zone 5.
-58-
59
DRAINAGE
O'l 0
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN FEE AREAS
10
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
7.0NL 1r.
ZONt 10
••-ZONE 15 BOUNDARY
'"""' DRAINAGE AREA NUMBER
11 FEE AREA BOUNDARY
)
(}
en ....
ZONE 1.1
ZONE 10 -ZONE.t -
-D
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
)
DRAINAGE
ZONE 16
MASTER PLANNED FACILITY
EXISTING STORM DRAINS & SIZE
OPEN CHANNEL
CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL m
X :c CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
DEBRIS BASIN
BASIN BOUNDARY
DEBRIS BAS IN
(FUTURE)
t~
JANUARY 1987
. -LOCAL FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
---APPROVED
C, z -U)
c(
J:
IL
FUTURE ---
DRAINAGE
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Ca.1cJ111•1» wlSttniard)
* YES
---YES
---YES
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
N/A
* Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual projects
are approved in Zone 5.
-62-
DRAINAGE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the
City concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other
public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it
is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are
finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which
are larger than those required from a single development project
and, therefore, need to be identified so that the proper funding
can be collected for the construction of these facilities.
A. Inventory
The City's Master Drainage Plan, completed in March, 1980,
identifies major. drainage facilities within Zone 5. The Master
Drainage Plan is currently being revised; however, preliminary
research indicates there will be no significant impacts in Zone
5 •
12,
Page
area.
Zone 5 contains three Master Drainage Plan fee areas (11,
and 13) as shown on Exhibit H, "Master Storm Drain Basins",
60, and one sub-basin not included with a drainage fee
1. Existing Facilities
Existing drainage facilities, within Zone 5 are shown on
Exhibit I, on Page 61. Zone 5 is divided into three separate
drainage basins, two of which drain to the Aqua Hedionda Lagoon.
The third and most predominant basin drains down the Encinas
Canyon and empties directly into the Pacific Ocean.
Drainage Area 11 drains westerly through the Encinas
Canyon to the Pacific Ocean. In addition to Zone 5 drainage the
Encinas Canyon basin drains portions of Zones 3, 4, 13, 17, 19,
20 and 21. The east end or upper portion of the Encinas Canyon
basin drains by way of localized storm drain pipes which empty
into an unlined open drainage channel. This unlined channel
extends westerly to the intersection of Palomar Oaks Way and
Palomar Airport Road and is privately owned and maintained.
Through the Birtcher Business Center, this channel includes three
permanent ponds or basins which were designed for siltation
control and storm water retention. West of Palomar Oaks Way the
drainage flows along unimproved open drainage channels and flood
-63-
-
plain until it
rail pond the
channel. From
once again flows
exception of the
reaches Interstate 5. From I-5 to the AT & SF
drainage is carried within a concrete lined open
the railroad tracks to the ocean the drainage
in unimproved open channels/flood plain with the
drainage structures_ beneath Carlsbad Blvd.
Drainage within area 12 generally drains northwesterly
through a series of public and private storm drains to a proposed
20 foot high dam/retention pond which is currently under
construction with Phase IV of the Carlsbad Researc~ Center. The
dam and included facilities act as both a desiltation and
detention basin. This facility will be privately owned and
maintained; however, pursuant to a Council approved condition of
approval for Carlsbad Tract 85-24 (Carlsbad Research Center) the
City may purchase the facility for water reclamation purposes
anytime prior to July 1, 1991. Below the dam structure the
drainage flows in unimproved open channels across the police
firing range and Macario Canyon Park which are located within
Zone 8.
Drainage within area 13 drains through a series of newly
constructed storm drains and discharges out of Zone 5 into Zone
15 at El Camino Real. Below this point the drainage flows in
unimproved channels to the Sunny Creek flood plain/riparian
corridor. In the future this section of drainage course will be
placed in an underground storm drain. In addition a desiltation
basin will be constructed at the point of discharge into Sunny
Creek, in accordance with the City's Master Drainage Plan.
Sunny Creek meanders in an unimproved state until it reaches the
Carlsbad Mobile Home Park. Through the mobile home park this
creek is contained within a rock lined, open channel. After
leaving the mobile home park this creek passes under El Camino
Real to a 15,000 cubic yard desiltation basin adjacent to Agua
Hedionda Lagoon.
The portion of Zone 5 north of Palomar Airport Road and
east of El Camino Real drains through a series of small strom
drains into the south fork of Sunny Creek. From there it flows
in unimproved riparian channel/flood plain to the main Sunnycreek
stream described above.
B. Phasing
Since the demand for future drainage facilities within
Zone 5 will be localized and generated by specific development,
it will be addressed as that developme~t occurs.
c. Adequacy findings
1. Zone 5 has been found to be in conformance with the
adopted performance standard. Additional information is beinQ
provided concerning drainage facilities which will be required as
new development occurs.
-64-
Drainage Area 11
The Encinas Canyon drainage below Palomar Oaks Way
currently flows in unimproved channels~ No master plan
facilities have been identified for this flood plain area. Staff
has conditioned several tentative maps within this area to place
the drainage within unlined or rock lined open channels generally
located along and parallel with Palomar Airport Road. Depending
upon which properties develop first, this alignment may have
impacts which extend both up and down. stream of the proposed
development. These impacts will be mitigated by the respective
developers as development occurs.
Drainage Area 12
No drainage problems are anticipated to occur within
Drainage Area 12. The proposed dam/retention facility at the
boundary of Zone 5 and 8 will provide adequate desiltation and
flood control to the Macario Canyon Park site below. Zone 5
properties within the bas·in will pay drainage area fees to
mitigate any possible impacts in accordance with the existing
drainage fee ordinance.
Drainage Area 13 and Sunnycreek Drainage Basin
The existing rock lined channel through Rancho Carlsbad
Mobile Home Park, is not up to City standards and is reported to
have overtopped its banks during recent storms. The drainage
area of this creek is approximately 20 square miles. The 100 yr.
storm flow through the mobile home park is approximately 10,000
cubic feet per second. (Ref. Williamson and Schmid/PD 277,
5/23/86). The portion of Zone 5 which drains this direction is
approximately 700 acres or less than 1 square mile, roughly, 5%
of the total drainage area is contributed by·Zone 5. The exact
nature of the improvements needed to mitigate the Rancho Mobile
Home Park drainage channel is not known at this time and is
beyond the scope of this zone report. Potential mitigations will
be addressed in the update to the Master Drainage Plan. Staff
recommends that prior to develpment of any property located
within the Sunnycreek Drainage Basin of Zone 5, the developers
shall be required to pay · their fair share of the mitigation
measures as required in the Master Drainage Plan Update. In
.addition Staff recommends that the 2700 cubic yard desiltation
basin at the north end of drainage line BL as shown on the Master
Drainage Plan, be installed prior to issuance of further
development permits in drainage area 13 within Zone 5~
-65-
-III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 5
Prior to issuance of further development permits within the
Sunnycreek Drainage Basin of Zone 5 the developer shall pay or
enter into an agreement with the City to pay for a proportional
share of the· mitigation of the 'downstream' drainage problems
associated with the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park in
accordance with the reQuirements of the update to the Master
Drainage Plan.
Prior to isssuance of further development permits within
Drainage Area 13 of Zone 5 the developer shall install the
desiltation basin identified as a 2700 cubic yard basin at the
north end of Master Drainage Plan Facility 'BL'.
Oetween I-5 and Hidden Valley Road the Encinas Canyon
drainage flows across land which has not been farmed or otherwise
improved. This area is potentially environmentally sensitive and
may not be able to support channelization. This issue must be
further addressed and resolved at the time specific development
and environmental plans are prepared for the area.
B. Financing
The cost of the mitigation to relieve the drainage problem
within the Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park cannot be determined
until a mitigation plan is adopted with the Master Drainage Plan
Update. Per the Master Drainage Plan the estimated cost of
desiltation basin 'BL' is as follows:
Desiltation basin
Contingencies (+15%)
Subtotal
Engr. and Admin (+20%)
Total per 1980 OMP
Inflation since 1980 (+50%)
Total Cost
$32,000
4,800
$36,800
7,360
$44,160
22,080
$66,240
The developer is eligible for reimbursement for
installation of desiltation basin 'BL' in accordance with Chapter
20.09 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Currently no funds exist
within the drainage fee account for area 13.
All other drainage improvements impacted by Zone 5 will be
financed by developers or by the use of drainage fees collected
b)' the City.
-66-
67
CIRCULATION
)
XON[ 11
I .
I
I
ZONE 5
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
ROADS & INTERSECTIONS
ZON[ lr.
ZONE 17
ZON£ 10
0 FfF Traffic Slpl
CU, of Ctfltf:l•d
G,owrtt '4.,....~•""'•'"r "1-'J-.J,lffl
J A N U A R Y 1 9 87
========================================================================================-::=-::-:=======-=-:~------··• .••
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION
EXISTING *
**
APPROVED
C, z -(J')
< ** ::x:
Q.
FUTURE
CIRCULATION
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Ca.lo.11•11» wllltandard)
* YES
** NO
-
** NO
MITIGATION
N/A
See
Page
. 79
See
Page
79
* The existing road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 5
currently comply with the adopted performance standard.
FUNDING
N/A
See
Page
98
See
Page
98
** The existing plus committed and future traffic demands will cause the
identified road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 5 to fall
below the adopted performance standard if the proposed mitigation is
not implemented.
-69-
-CIRCULATION
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No road segment or intersectio~ in the zone nor any road
segme~t or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by
development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service
level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak
hours. Impacted means where twenty percent· or more of the
traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will
use the road segment or intersection.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the circulation system within Zone 5 conforms to the adopted
performance standards for Zone 5. It will also address all
Circulation Element Roads and intersections outside of Zone 5
impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by
Zone 5 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance
standard. Improvements that will be needed to completely develop
the Circulation Element road~ such as sidewalks, street lights,
etc., are discussed separately for informational purposes, in
Appendix 5, beginninq on Page 175.
A• Inventory
The followinq Circulation Element Roads and Intersections
are located within Zone 5. Appendix 5 lists the needed
improvements to complete all Circulation Element roadways within
Zone 5 to their full buildout width.
Number of Lanes
Roads Existing Buildout Classification
1. Palomar Airport Road 2-4 6 Prime Arterial
2. El Camino Real 4 6 Prime Arterial
3. College Avenue O* 4 Major Arterial
4. Camino Vida Roble 2** 2 Secondary Arterial
5. Faraday Avenue 0/4 4 Secondary Arterial
6. El Fuerte Street 0 4 Secondary Arterial
7. Hidden Valley Road 0 4 Secondary Arterial
* Under construction from PAR to ECR -4 lanes.
** Built to industrial street standards 52' V.S. 64' curb to curb width
ultimate configuration to be two thru lanes and a left turn pocket.
Intersections
1. Palomar Airport Road and Hidden Valley Road (Future)
2. Palomar Airport Road and College Boulevard (Under Construction)
3. Palomar Airport Road and Camino Vida Roble (Existing)
4. Palomar Airport Road and Yarrow Drive (Existing)
5. Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real (Existing)
-70-
6. Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte Street (Existing -3 legs)
7. El Camino Real and College Boulevard (Under Construction)
8. El Camino Real and Faraday Avenue (Existing)
9. El Camino Real and Camino Vida Roble (Existing 3 leqs)
10. College Boulevard and Faraday Avenue (Under Construction)
The following Circulation Element Roadways and
Intersections are outside of Zone 5, but are impacted by 20% or
more of the traffic generated by Zone 5.
Number of Lanes
Roads Existing Buildout Classification
1 • Palomar Airport Rd. from Zone 5
to Southbound I-5 Ramps 2/4 6 Prime Arterial
2. Palomar Airport Rd. from Zone 5
to existing City limits 2 6 Prime Arterial
3. El Camino real from Zone 5
to Tamarack Ave.* 4 6 Prime Arterial
*For existing conditions. At buildout this road segment will carry less than
20% of the Zone 5 traffic.
Intersections
1. Palomar Airport Road and I-5 southbound (Existing)
2. Palomar Airport Road and I-5 northbound (ExistinQ)
3. Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte (Existing)
4. Palomer Airport Road and Melrose Drive (Future)
5. El Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue (Existing)
6. El Camino Heal and Kelly Drive (Existinq -3 legs)
7. El Camino Heal and Cannon Road (Future)
B. Phasing
Although Zone 5 is considered an infill zone there is
still a tremendous amount of building potential remaininq in this
zone. It is estimated that only 1~% of the total development
that will occur in Zone 5 has been completed. Presently
4,256,609 square foot of non-residential development exists
within Zone 5. There is a potential for a total of 22,196,299
square foot of non-residential development within Zone 5 at
buildout. The non-residential development in this zone has been
phased out to the buildout of Zone 5 in the year 2013.
There are 15 approved projects in Zone 5 with a
development potential of 9,545,303 square feet. It is estimated
that these projects will buildout by 1996 at an average yearly
rate of 954,530 square feet. The remaining acreage in Zone 5
that currently does not have any approvals is projected to
probably buildout after 1996. As explained previously, this
yearly estimate was obtained from researching past records,
marketinq studies and talking with commercial brokers.
-71-
The Barton-Aschman traffic study which is the source for
this traffic a~alysis was set up to analyze traffic at three
threshold points; existing development, existing plus committed
and buildout. Previous zone plans for infill areas with little
development potential did not attempt to phase needed
improvements, but based the timing of the needed improvements at
one of these three thresholds. Due to the large development
potential of Zone 5, this plan has been prepared with a modified
phasing program. The Zone 5 plan still recognizes the three
thresholds of existing, existing plus committed and buildout.
However, the existing plus committed category has been separated
into three phases:
1. Improvements needed in 1 3 years
2. Improvements needed in 4 -6 years
3. Improvements needed in 7 10 years
The buildout phase of Zone 5 is projected to be from 1998-2013.
c. Assumptions
The following assumptions were utilized by staff for
purposes of evaluating traffic impact of Zone 5.
1. Distribution of Zone 5 traffic for both existing and
buildout conditions is shown on Exhibit Jon Page
73.
2.
3.
4.
All Circulation Element road segments are in
place at buildout.
Industrial Traffic Generation =
building area.
8 ADT/1000 SF of
Road segments were analyzed using the
capacity manual worksheet for general
segments for two lane hiahways.
highway
terrain
5. Greater than 20,000 ADT = LOS F for Collector Steets
6. AM/PM peak= 10% of ADT
-72-
-..J
(.;J
)
EXISTING ROAD
---FUTURE ROAD
10/ 15 % OF ZONE TRAFFIC
EXISTING/BUILDOUT
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
)
TRIP DISTRIBUTION MAP
RO
, v o,e
"'
I
I
20/20
m
X :::c
m
I -..J w QI
I
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
e 1-3 years
• 4-6 years
O 7-10 years
-k BEFORE BUILDOUT
~ R O A D S E G M E N T
IMPROVEMENTS
AT BUILDOUT
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES
)
CIR1CULATION IMPROVEMENTS
REQUIRED FOR EXISTING PLUS
COMMITTEED DEVELOPMENT
*NOTE: Some of these intersection improvements
may be completed with existing plus
committed development or may require
special improvements beyond those
required by the circulation element
of the General Plan.
MANAGEMENT PLAN
---.,,,,,,,,,,,.--r
---...,t ' ,._ I
\
\
' ' ' .......... ..... ' '\
& BUILDOUT
I
*'
\
\
\
CllfolC•twN
Gro•lfl Management i,tro,gram
JANUARY 1987
D. Adequacy Findings
Currently all intersections and road segments within Zone
5 or impacted by Zone 5 traffic meet the adopted performance
standard. With the existing plus committed traffic impacts,
seven intersections and two road segments are projected to fall
below the adopted performance standard. At buildout nine
intersections are projected to fall below the City's adopted
performance standard unless mitigating improvements beyond those
required under the current circulation element are installed.
These intersections and segments are identified in tabular form
on Chart C on Page 78. This chart also presents an estimated
time to failure in three separate phases as discussed previously
under phasing.
Chart "A'' on Page 76 indicates the existing, existing
plus committed, and buildout levels of service for each of the
intersections impacted by Zone 5. These levels of service were
obtained from the traffic study prepared by Barton-Aschman
Associates. The existing levels of service are based on actual
traffic counts at these intersections. The existing plus
committed, and the bulldout levels of service are projected based
upon sophisticated modeling techniques that determine traffic
assignments from committed, and future projects respectively.
The trip assignments for committed projects are added to actual
traffic volumes to determine existing plus committed levels of
service. For the buildout level of service analysis, future trip
assignments were added to existing plus committed traffic
volumes. The buildout level of service noted for each
intersection assumes that all of the mitigation measures proposed
to provide acceptable levels of service for existinq plus
committed are already in place.
Zone 5 is the first zone to include road segments which
are projected to fall below the adopted performance standard.
Since the Barton-Aschman study did not analyze road segments,
City Engineering staff performed the analysis. Only the two lane
road segments along Palomar Airport Road were analyzed. The four
lane segments of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real were
assumed to operate at acceptable levels of service for existing
and existing plus committed traffic volumes. It should be
understood these other road segments will at some time in the
future (before buildout) need upgrading to their full circulation
element configuration. The timing of these upgrades will be
subject to on-going review and monitoring of the Fac~lities
Management Plan as specific development is approved which affects
these road segments.
To
utilized
general
existing
determine the capacity of the road segments, staff
the Highway Capacity Manual Technical Worksheet for
terrain segments for two lane highways. Existing and
plus committed peak hour traffic volumes for the
-74-
corresponding road segments were obtained from the Barton-Aschman
Traffic Study. As can be seen on Chart "B'' on Page 77 these two
road segments on Palomar Airport Road currently operate a level
of Service D. At existing plus committed these two segments of
Palomar Airport ~oad drop below the established standard. Since
the Highway Capacity Manual method of determininq service levels
does not quantify the difference between level of service E and
F, the exact service level cannot be determined by this method.
However, for the purpose of this study it ls sufficient to know
the level of service will not meet the adopted performance
standard with existing plus committed traffic.
-75-
) ) )
~HART A
Existing Existing/Committed Buildout
AM PM AM PM AM PM
Intersection Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak
College Blvd/Faraday Ave. C C
El Camino Real/Camino Vida Roble A. A B D C A
El Camino Real/Cannon Road C E*
El Camino Real/College C F*
El Camino Real/Faraday A A C E* F* F
El Camino Real/Kelly A A D F* A A
El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Rd A A E* F* D E*
..... ll Camino Real/Tamarack Ave A A F* F* A A
en
Palomar Airport Rd/Camino Vida Roble A A C D D D
Palomar Airport Rd/.College u F*
Palomar Apt Rd/El Fuerte St. E* F*
Palomar Apt Rd/Hidden Valley Rd. A C
Palomar Apt Rd/1-5 Northbound B D D F* C D
Palomar Apt Rd/1-5 Southbound A A C F* A A
Palomar Apt Rd/Melrose Dr E F*
Palomar Apt Rd/Paseo del Norte A B D F* D F*
Palomar Apt Rd/Yarrow Dr. A A A B D F*
*Fails to meet the required performance Standard
-..J
-..J
Segment
Palomar Airport Rd -Paseo
del Norte to Palomar Oaks Way
Palomar Airport Rd -El Camino
Real to east City limit
CHART B
Peak Hour Level of Service
Existing Existing Plus
AM PM AM
D D E
D D E
Committed
PM
E or F*
E or F*
* All level of service values calculated using the highway capacity manual
special report 209, 1985. The manual does not make analytical distinctions
between level of service E and Fas level of service E represents capacity
failure of the road segment.
-...J 00
Intersections
El Camino Heal/Cannon
El Camino Real/College
El Camino Real/Faraday
El Camino Real/Kelly
CHART C
ZONE 5
FAILURE PROJECTIONS
Time to Failure
1-3 Years 4-6 Years 7-10 Years
)
Before Buildout
----------------------------------------------X ----------------------------------------------X ----------------------------X-----------------X ----------------X El Camino Real/Palomar Airport Rd. ----------------------------X-----------------X El Camino Heal/Tamarack ----------------------------X
Palomar Airport Rd/College ------------------------------.---------------X Palomar Airport Rd/El Fuerte ----------------------------------------------X Palomar Airport Rd/1-5 S/B ----X
Palomar Airport Rd /1-5 N/B ----X
Palomar Airport Rd/Melrose ----------------------------------------------X Palomar Airport Rd/Paseo del Norte ----------------------------X-----------------X Palomar Airport Rd/Yarrow ----------------------------------------------X
Segments
Palomar Airport Road
PON to Camino Vida Roble ----X
Palomar Airport Road
ECR to east City limits ----X
The timing for the upgrade to these road segments was
determined by using a straight line projection of the increase in
traffic from existing to existing plus committed and pickinq the
point at which the traffic volume crosses the threshold of "E"
level of service. Intersection failure times were analyzed in a
similar manner, however, the added variables of turning
movements, cycle-times and side frictions makes it somewhat less
reliable as a means of determining exactly when the intersection
will fail.
As noted above for road segments the timing for
installation of the buildout mitigations for intersections cannot
be estimated at this time. These intersections will be monitored
and recommendations made on the timing of the installations as
part of the ongoing review process for the Growth Management
Program. It will be necessary to closely review projects which
front on impacted intersections to obtain additional right-of-way
which may be required to install the proposed mitigating
improvements.
III. MITIGATION
The proposed mitigation is divided into two sections. One
section will deal with the mitigation needed to acommodate
existin9 plus committed traffic and the other section will deal
with mitigation for buildout traffic demands. All the
intersection mitigation improvments are taken directly from the
mitigation recommendations presented in the Barton-Aschman
traffic study. The cost estimates have been altered to better
reflect existing field conditions. It should be understood that
all cost estimates presented in this plan are preliminary in
nature and will need further refinement as the actual scope of
work, utility needs and right-of-way dedications are determined.
Mitigation for the various intersections and road segments
have been grouped in accordance with the phasing parameters
discussed previously. For easy reference the report includes a
matrix on Page 100 which summarizes the project mitigation
phasing groups, cost and alternative financing mechanisms.
Improvements needed within 1 -3 Years
A. Impacted Intersections
Palomar Airport Road at I-5 Northbound and Southbound
These two
because they are
intersections will be mitigated as a unit
both dependent on construction of the bridge
-79-
overpass at the Interstate-5 freeway. The Barton-Aschman study
has recommended the following improvements to be made to Palomar
Airport Road and the freeway ramps to bring these intersections
into conformance with adopted performance standards. These
recommended improvments are subject to revision and modification
as the bridge plans become formalized. The Caltrans process for
construction of interstate bridges require more detailed traffic
analysis and study be done on the specific area prior to their
approval than -was done with the Citywide Barton-Aschman traffic
study.
For existing plus committed conditions, it is anticipated
that the intersection of I-5 southbound and Palomar Airport R6ad
will operate at levels of service C and F during the morning and
afternoon peak periods, respectively. The improvments shown in
Exhibit K on Page 82 would improve conditions such that the
level of service will be A and C, respectively. The required
improvments consist of restriping to provide two through lanes
for eastbound and westbound, each and widening of the southbound
off-ramp to provide three lanes (one left only, one right only
and one optional).
It is anticipated that the intersection of Palomar Airport
·Road at the I-5 northbound ramps will operate at levels of
service D and F during the morning and afternoon, respectively.
Widening of the east and west approaches to provide an additional
through lane for each direction would result in level of service
A and B, respectively. These improvements are also shown on
Exhibit Kon Page 82.
In addition to the roadway improvements discussed above,
both intersections of Palomar Airport Road at I-5 off-ramps
should be signalized and coordinated with the signals at Paseo
del Norte.
Estimated construction cost is $7,989,000 to construct the
additional right-turn lane for the southbound ramp and
installation of signals. Widening of Palomar Airport Road is
part of the City's circulation plan and is, therefore, not
included in this cost estimate.
Staff is projecting failure of the northbound ramps within
the next 3 years and the southbound ramps within 4-6 years.
Since the Barton-Aschman report required construction of the
bridge widening as mitigation for intersections, the bridge
installation and improvements needed to bring both intersections
into conformance would be required by 1990. The best estimates
at this point are that the bridge could not be installed through
the normal Caltrans process until 1992 or 1993 at the earliest .•
-80-
There are three alternatives which if implemented together
or separately may be able to provide an interim solu~ion to allow
continued development in the zone until the bridqe widening is in
place. More detailed traffic analysis will be needed to
determine the actual impacts each of these proposed alternatives
would have on the performance level of the freeway intersections.
The alternatives are as follows:
1. Installation of Cannon Road from El Camino Real to I-5
and Faraday Avenue from College Boulevard to Cannon
Road. These roadway links would siphon existing and
proposed traffic off at Palomar Airport Road.
2. Installation of Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to
I-5 and College Boulevard from Palomar Airport Road to
Poinsettia Lane. This would have a similar effect as
the Cannon Road link. Staff believes this link would
have less impact to reduce traffic on Palomar Airport
Road than the Cannon Road link.
3. Modification of the· northbound on and off ramp to
provide a separate left turn and right turn lane.
Also widen the south side of Palomar Airport Road from
the northbound off ramp to the Denney's Restaurant
driveway.
The following cost estimates for the mitigation and each
of the alternatives are ~reliminary in nature and subject to
change as detailed engineering studies and plans are prepared.
B.
1.
Cost of bridge and intersection improvements: $8 million
Alternatives:
Cannon Road/Faraday Ave. Connection: $6 million
Poinsettia Lane/College Blvd. Connection: $10 million
Widening N/S off ramp and Palomar Apt. Rd: $50,000
Impacted Road Segments
Palomar Airport Road Segment from Paseo del Norte to
Palomar Oaks Way
Without widening it is anticipated this road segment will
fall by the year 1990. Widening the road to a 4 lane facility
will bring the road into conformance with the adopted performance
standard for existing plus committed traffic. The City is
currently in the process of forming an assessment district to
widen this section of Palomar Airport Road to its ultimate
configuration of six lanes plus median. Improvement drawings
should be completed by August of 1987. The current estimate for
-81-
I
00
N I
)
PALOMAR AIIPOAT
...
m
(/)
,n
..!..
l
...
)
t
... ...
J ...
SCHEMATIC OF PRO.POSED IMPROVEMENTS AT 6
::P::A::L_O.;;;. _.;.;.;M~A::R::A::IR;:P:;O::R=T::::R::0::A::D::A::T::::1-::5=::s_o=-_=-u_T.;..;H=B=O::U::N::D::::A::N=D::N::O::_R:..:.T::H::8::0::U=N~D~============:;~ N ~
:::c
m
=i
"
-the cost of this work is $7,300,000. This estimate is based on
detailed improvement drawings and is a fairly accurate
representation of the actual cost to construct.
2.
Cost of mitigation: $7,300,000
Timing: Construction must be complete by 1990
City projects construction by 1989.
Palomar Airport Road Segment from El Camino Real to East
City Limits
Without widening it is anticipated this road segment will
fail by the year 1991. Widening of the road to a 4 lane facility
will brinq the road into conformance with the adopted performance
standard for existinq plus committed traffic. The City is
currently working on two projects within the limits of this road
segment.
The first project which .is under design is installation of
half street improvements along the north side of Palomar Airport
Road from El Camino Real to the newly ·constructed improvements at
the Carlsbad Oaks Business ~ark (Kaiser/Bedford). Together with
a new striping arrangement adjacent to the Carlsbad Oaks project
this will provide four lanes of traffic from El Camino Real to
the east end of Zone 5. The latest cost estimate for this work
is $650,000 (including design which ls 90% complete). The City
has budgeted $900,000 for this project. Construction could be
complete on this project by mid 1988.
The second project is a proposed assessment district which
would complete the remaining Palomar Airport Road improvements
east of El Camino Real to full prime arterial standards (6 lanes
and median). This proposed assessment district is in the
prelimindry stage only at this time. No improvement plans have
been prepared and Council has not yet directed staff to proceed
with the project. Preliminary estimates of the cost of this work
is $8 million.
Since it is fairly assured Palomar Airport Road will be
widened to 4 lanes from El Camino Real to east end of Zone 5, the
only rema1n1ng section which is needed to keep Palomar Airport
·Road in conformance with the adopted standard for existing plus
committed traffic is the widening of Palomar Airport Road to a
four lane facility from the Zone 5 boundary to the east City
limits. The remaining widening is needed to meet buildout
traffic needs.
Cost of mitigation:
Project 1 -North half Palomar Airport Road from El
Camino Real to Zone 5 boundary ••••••••••••••• $650,000
Project 2 -4 land facility from Zone 5 to east City
1 i m 1 ts ••••...•••••...•••••.....••••••.••... $1 , 1 00, 000
Timing: Improvements needed by 1991
-83-
EXHIBIT L
El Camino Real at Kelly Drive
It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at Levels
of Service D and F during the respective peak periods. Widening
of El Camino Real to prime arterial standard, signalization, and
separate southbound right-turn lane would result in Levels of
Service 8 and C, respectively. The proposed intersection
configuration is shown in the Figure below. ·
Estimated cost is $200,000.
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
KELLY OR
~
~ j VACANT
< u _,
1 1----.---.---1 W
T I T
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
I
I
S ::C::H::E:::M:::A:::T::IC::::::::::0::F::P:::R::::O::::P:::O::S::ED:::::::IM::P::R:::0:::::V=E=M=E=NT=S==A=T===========fl "if :L CAMINO REAL AT KELL y DRIVE Ll
-BIJ-
/-
EXHIBIT M
El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue
With the existing geometric conditions, it is anticipated that
this intersection will operate at Level of Service C in the
morning and Level of Service E in the afternoon. The
intersection configuration shown in the Figure below would
provide level of Service C in the morning and Bin the afternoon~
The improvements consist of modifying the lane usage pattern and
improvements such that three lanes can be provided in each north-
south direction. For the east-west approach, the lanes should be
designated so that there is a right-turn only, and throuqh plus
left turn lane for each approach. These improvements require
restriping only. Therefore the cost is neglible.
Estimated Cost: $50,000
lJ INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL -1 !
...... FARADAY AVE
~I E
, .. 9\ r t f. <
INDUSTRIAL OFFICE "' ~
I c.> .. "'
St:=C1~H§E~M~A~T~IC~O~F~P~R:::O::::P:::O::S::E:::O:::N::::::PR::O::::V::::E:::M::E=NTS===AT===========n <ii s_L CAMINO REAL AT F ARA0A Y AVENUE lJ
-85-
-
EXHIBIT N
El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road
Upon completion of the existing plus committ~d projects, the
intersection of El Camino Real at Palomar Airport Road ls
expected to operate at Levels of Service E and· F during the
morning and afternoon peak period, respectively. In order for
the intersection to operate at acceptable standards, the
improvements shown in the Figure below should be implemented.
These improvements consist of widening El Camino Real to the full
prime arterial width of three lanes each direction as indicated
in the City's circulation plan, and provision of an additional
southbound right-turn lane and designation of two left-turn-only
lanes. In addition, the westbound approach should be widened so
that two through and two right-turn-only lanes can be provided.
The level of service following implementation of the improvements
would result in Levels of Service C and D, respectively.
The Barton-Aschman study recommended a dual right-turn lane
configuration from westbound Palomar Airport Road to northbound
El Camino Real. Staff recommends that prior to implementation of
this configuration the use of a free right-turn together with an
additional merge lane on El Camino Real be investiqated. Dual
right-turn lanes are not common and present problems for the
drivers making the turn. Installation of a free right lane would
increase the cost of the mitigation by about $70,000.
The City Engineer recommends that the City include the Barton-
Aschman buildout mitigation improvements within the existing plus
committed improvement mitigation. For this intersection little
additional costs and no additional right of way would be needed
to install the buildout improvement. Barton-Aschman estimates
these additional buildout costs to be approximately $37,200.
Existing plus committed mitigation costs:
Free right turn/merge lane option:
Buildout option:
AIRPORT
-
MOTEL
VACANT
fi'ALOM•• A,_ftO-T •OAO
'---t:
VACANT
$100,000
$ 70,000
$ 37,200
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT 0
:::PA::L~O'.::M:::A:::R::::A::l::R:::PO::R:::T:::::::R::0::A:::D:::A:::T:::E~L::C~A::M:::IN::O~R~E::A~L=====::::!~
-86-
EXHIBIT 0
El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue
Without mitigation measures, it ls anticipated that this
intersection will operate at Level of Service F during both peak
periods. In order to mitlqate the unacceptable levels of
service, the improvements shown below should be provided. These
improvments consist of restriping to provide optional through and
turn lanes for the east and west approaches, wideninq of the
southbound approach to provide one additional lane and widening
the northbound approach to provide two left-turn-only, two right-
turn-only and three through lanes. The result of these
improvements would be Level of Service D during the peak
periods.
The Barton-Aschman study recommended a dual right turn lane
configuration from northbound El Camino Real to eastbound
Tamarack Avenue. Staff recommends that prior to implementation
of this configuration the use of a free right turn ramp together
with an additional merge lane on Tamarack Avenue be investigated.
Dual right turn lanes are not common and will present problems to
drivers making the turn. Installation of a free right lane would
increase the cost of mitigation by about $70,000.
Cost of mltiqation: $200,000
Free right turn/merge lanes option: $70,000
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
TAMARACK AVE
'-
~
,r
VACANT
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT
EL CAMINO REAL AT TAMARACK AVENUE
XISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITION)
-87-
cn,DIC•-..,_..,-~..,..,
-JANUARY 1987
EXHIBIT P
Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte
The level of service analysis indicated that the intersection of
Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte would operate at level
of Service D and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods,
respectively. The improvements necessary to mitigate the
unacceptable afternoon level of service consist of widening the
westbound approach to provide a separate right-turn-only lane and
widening the northbound approach to provide two left-turn-only
lanes. Signals should also be installed for the ·westbound
approach to channelize drivers into the proper lanes as shown in
the Figure below. The improvements shown would result in a level
of Service O in the afternoon and Bin the morning peak hours.
Estimated Cost: $50,000
VACANT
RESTAURANT
PALOMA!CI Al!CIPORT ROAC ...
-1'0 1-1 .. ,._
-T0 1-1 --_,,_,
r --
SERVICE ST A TION SERVICE STATION
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS D
:::PA::L:::O::::M::::A:::R::::::::A::IR::::P:::O::R:::::T:::::R:::0:::A::D:::::A::T:::P:::A::::S:::E:::0:::::0::E::L:::N::O::R::T:::::E:::==========!f'U!
-BB-
EXHIBIT Q
Cannon Road at El Camino Real
If this intersection is constructed with cross sections shown in
the City's Circulation Plan, the morning and afternoon levels of
service would be C and E, respectively for buildout conditions.
Installation of a northbound to eastbound right-turn only lane as
shown below would improve the afternoon condition to Level of
Service D.
Cost Estimate: $35,500
~ < w a::
i ~ < t.)
~ ! ! ~ ~ w
~ --
.J r --..
~ ~ CANNON AD
-i T T T i.
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT .Q.
:::E::L::C::A:::M::::IN::O::::=R:::E:::A:::L=A=T=:::C::::A::NN::O:::::N:::R:::::O::A::D::==================~fl..N
-89-
EXHIBIT R
El Camino Real at College Boulevard
Without improvements in addition to those in the City's
Circulation Plan, this intersection is expected to operate at
Level of Service C and F during the morning and afternoon
respectively. In order to provide an acceptable level of service
during the afternoon, an eastbound to northbound left-turn lane
and a westbound to southbound left-turn lane should be added.
The westbound approach should also be restriped to provide a
right only and an optional right and through lane. See Figure
below. These improvements would improve the afternoon level of
service to D.
Cost Estimate: $74,500
~ ~
i <
~ ! ! I. 0 _,
w ...
'-
A -
_, I-
I
,r
J r --
T
"'"COLLEGE BLVD
~ 1 1 l-
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT 0,
=E=L=C=A=M=IN=O:::::R::EA:::L:::::A::::T:::C::::O::::L::L::EG::E:::::B::LV::D::==================::.flli
-90-
EXHIBIT S
Palomar Airport Road at College Boulevard
Without improvements, this intersection will operate at Level of
Service D and F during the morning and afternoon respectively.
Mitigation measures include an additional southbound to westbound
right~only lane, a westbound to southbound left-turn lane, an
eastbound to southbound right-only lane, and an eastbound to
northbound left turn lane. With the improvements shown in Figure
below, the morning and afternoon Levels of Service would be C and
D, respectively.
Cost estimate $145,400.
_,
.J ---
~
-i f f
~ 0 cc
--
r
r
~ 'COLLEGE BL VD
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT Q
=P::A=LO==M=A::R=A:::IR:::P=O::R:::T::::::::R:::O::A::D::A::::T:::C::O::L::L::E::::G::E:::B::::L::V:::D=============~M
-91-
EXHIBIT T
Palomar Airport Road at El Fuerte.
During the morning and afternoon peak periods, this intersection
is expected to operate at Levels of Service E and F,
respectively. Mitigation measures include an additional
southbound to eastbound left-turn lane, an additional westbound
to southbound left-turn lane and an eastbound to southbound
-riqht-turn only lane. See Figure below. The Levels of Service
would be C and D, respectively.
Cost Estimate: $109,900
I-Cl)
w I-a: ~
-i l ~ '-l. ~ w ..
.s. --.,..
.J r ---
1 1----,-----.. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
t
=SC=H:::E:::::M:::A:::::T:::IC:::::::::O::::F::::PR:::::O::::PO::S:::E::::D::::::IM::P::R::::O::::V:::EM::E::NT:::=A=T=============~n~ FUERTE ST AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD J L..U
-92-
EXHIBIT U
Palomar Airport Road at Melrose Drive
Without additional improvements, this intersection will operate
at Level of Service E and F during the morninq and afternoon peak
periods. Improvements required consist of an. additional left-
turn lane on each approach and an eastbound t~ southbound right-
turn only lane as shown below. These improvements would provide
Level of Service D during both morning and afternoon peak
periods.
Cost Estimate: $184,200
--
J r
J r
---
""'It
1--........ --...-.---,---, MELROSE DR
"'19\Tf~
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT /\
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AT MELROSE DR nJ!
=====================================================---,
-93-
--
-
EXHIBIT V
El Cami8o Real at Palomar Airport Roap
It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at Level of
Service D and E during the morning and afternoon peak periods,
respectively, it huildout conditions. The necessary improvements
to allo~ this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of
service include adding one eastbound left-turn lane and are shown
below. As a result, Level of Service D would result at this
intersection during the morning and afternoo~ peak periods.
Cost Estimate: $37,200
..J < I.I.I cc
i :IE < 0
..J I.I.I ...
'-
'---r
--...
1---.---,..---r--.....,.~ PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
"I t t t-
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT {j
EL CAMINO REAL AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD n N ===========================================~· L..!.:
-94-
EXHIBIT W
Palomar Airport Road at Yarrow/McClellan Drive
The level of service analysis projicts this intersection will
operate at Level of Service D and F during the morning and
afternoon peak periods, respectively. The Figure below shows the
improvements necessary to allow the intersection to operate at an
aceptabl~ level of service. These include an additional
westbound left-turA lane and restriping and the northbound
through lane for an optional through plus a right-turn lane, plus
right-turn only lane and restriping the southbound approach. As
a result of these improvements, the intersection is •projected to
operate at Level of Service B and C during the morning and
afternoon peak periods, respectlvley.
Cost Estimate: $37,300
w ~ fs z w .., ..,
w ..,
i ~ 0 a:
,) i. a: < ► .. ..
'---
r
.J r --
~ -,. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
9\ 1-('
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT /).
;:Y=A=R::R:::::O:::W::::/::M:::C:::L::EL::L::E::N::::D:::R:::::A:::T::::P::::A::L::::0::::M:::A::R:::::A::IR:::P::::O:::R:::T:::R::D::========::::::~
-95-
·-
-
EXHIBIT X
El Camino Real at Faraday Avenue
It is projected that this intersection will operate at Level of
Service F during the morning and afternoon peak periods for
buildout conditions. The improvements shown below would result
in Level of Se~vice D during the morning and afternoon peak
periods. The improvements consist of adding one westbound right-
turn lane, adding one eastbound left-turn lane, adding two
eastbound right-turn lanes, adding one northbound left lane, one
westbound left-turn lane and a southbound to westbound right-turn
ramp.
Cost Estimate: $352,100
~ w a:
i <
1 '
(.)
' '-_,
w
~
--
J r --
-it
-it
~ ~ t t i-FARADAY AVENUE
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AT 0
=E=L=C=A=M=l.:.:N_ =o_ ..:._R-:..E=:.A-:..L=:..:..:A_T-:_..:.F.;.A=R.:A_-:.=.o.:A:Y:_A~V-=-E ____ -:..-:..-:..-:..-:..-_-:..-:..-:..-:..-_-:..-:..-_-_-_-_-_-__,-fll:l
-96-
EXHIBIT Y
Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte
It is projected that this intersection will operate at Level of
Service D and F during the morning and afternoon peak periods,
respectively, for buildout conditions. The necessary
improvements to allow this intersection to operate at an
acceptable level of service will include restrlpinq the
southbound through lane for an optional through plus left-turn
lane. These improvements will result in a Level of Service D for
both the morning and afternoon peak periods. See Fiqure Below.
Cost Estimate: -0-(Restriping costs only)
VACANT
RESTAURANT
-
r --
SERVICE ST A TION SERVICE ST A TION
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ,6.
.... P...;.A=-LO=-M_A_R_A_I_R_P_O_R_T_R_O_A_D_A_T_P_A_S __ E_O ____ D_E __ L __ N __ Oa..;.R ..... T __ E _______ ___.n.lL -------------------------------
-97-
-
Timing and Financing of Mitigation
Each of the needed improvements have been separated into
four categories which indicate a specific· time range for the
improvements to be made. ·These categories are more specific than
the three levels of analysis which were done for the Barton-
Aschman Traffic Study. Those were existing, existing plus
committed, and buildout.
Exhibit Z, "Circulation Improvement Costs," on Page 100
summarizes these categories~ The matrix classifies all
improvements in
projected to be
1991, 1994, 1998,
terms of the year in which the improvement is
needed, i.e., specific improvements needed by
and 2013.
The exhibit further identifies the estimated cost and
financing options available to provide each of the improvements.
A summary shows the cost estimate to complete the improvements
identified in each category as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Constructed
Construct.ed
Constructed
Constructed
Total
by
by
by
by
1991 $17,139,000
1994 200,000
1998 540,000
2013 7,524,000
$25,655,100
These cost estimates will be reviewed and updated as improvement
plans are prepared.
Exact timing of these improvements has been related
directly to staff's phasing of the Zone. There is the potential
for this schedule to be modified as individual development
projects are proposed which vary from staff's projected phasing.
Under whatever phasing scenario actually occurs, the adopted
performance standard will be maintained or no development shall
be allowed to proceed.
The financing of these needed circulation improvements can
be acomplished through a number of available financing
alternatives. Each alternative will have different advantaqes
and disadvantages which must be evaluated prior to selecting the
best method for a given improvement. The specific advantages and
disadvantages change over time so that selecting a precise
financing method today for a future improvement may create
unforseen consequences. For that reason, staff has developed a
flexible financing matrix which priortizes the best financing
opt ions available . t-oday for each needed improvement as
identified. Other financing options may be available and more
appropriate as these improvements are needed in the future.
-98-
Wherp the City is currently collecting a fee for a
specific improvement, this financing source has been identified
as the City's first priority. However, because there ls a laq
time between fees collected and the need for improvements, funds
from these sources may not be available to finance an improvement
concurrent with need. Therefore, another source must be found
such as a developer contribution or some other innovative
financing alternative. If no other options exist, then
development must wait until the City can finance the
improvement.
This plan will establish a sound basis for the City to
ensure needed circulation improvements are made in accordance
with the adopted performance standard. It also sets in place
adaptable financing options that can be used to select the best
alternative funding mechanism available when the improvement ls
needed.
-99-
I ....
0 0 I
CIRCULATION 1~¥ROVEMENT COSTS
PROJECT
TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1991
1 I-5/PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD BRIDGES
2 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ROAD SEGMENT (PASEO DEL NORTE TO CAMINO VIDA ROBLE)
3 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ROAD SEGMENT (EL CAMINO REAL TO EAST CITY LIMITS)
TOTAL COSTS BY 1991
TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1994
1 EL CAMINO REAL/KELLY DR.
TOTAL COSTS BY 1994 ========================================= TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 1998 -----------------------------------------1 EL CAMINO REAL/FARADAY
2 EL CAMINO REAL/PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
3 EL CAMINO REAL/TAMARACK*
4 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/PASEO DEL NORTE
TOTAL COSTS BY 1998 ========================================= TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 2013 -----------------------------------------1 EL CAMINO REAL/CANNON RD.
2 EL CAMINO REAL/COLLEGE
3 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/COLLEGE
4 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/EL FUERTE
5 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/MELROSE
6 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/EL CAMINO REAL
7 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/YARROW
8 EL CAMINO REAL/FARADAY
9 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD/ROAD SEGMENT (EL CAMINO REAL TO EAST CITY LIMITS)
TOTAL COSTS BY 2013
COST
7,989,000
7,300,000
1,750,000
17,039,000 ----------------------
200,000
200,000 ----------------------
50,000
170,000
270,000
50,000 -----------540,000 ----------------------
35,500
74,500
145,400
109,900
184,200
37,200
37,300
352,100
6,900,000
7,876,100
FINANCING PRIORITIES
OPTION 1
BRIDGE DIST.
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
--------------------------
T.I.F.
--------------------------
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
--------------------------
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
T.I.F.
DEVELOPER
OPTION 2
DEVELOPER
ASSESS.DIST.
ASSESS.DIS';{'.
DEVELOPER
--------------------------
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
--------------------------
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
DEVELOPER
ASSESS.DIST.
==========================================-===============================================
m >< :c m =i
N
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS $ 25,655,100 * CONDITIONED UPON DEVELOPMENT IN ZONE 2
101
FIRE
* FIRE STATIONS-EXISTING
Q FIRE STATIONS-PLANNED
(5 minute)
FIRE RESPONSE TIME
--STATION 1
,._ -STATION 2
•--STATION 3
■■• -STATION 4
,_. ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES
-' -I --·-~ o ,,.---I
I
ZONE 6
MANAGEMENT PLAN
-102 -
FIRE
0
CH,-otCa,l1hd
Growll'I ~ ......... P,◊Qll'a,n
JANUARY 1887
L O CAL . FA C I L IT I ES MAN ·A G E M E N T PL A N -Zone 5
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
** APPROVED
C, z -"' < :c
0.
FUTURE **
FIRE
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPP.LY (CGNmmr» wlStln:lard)
* *
** **
** **
MITIGATION
*
**
**
* Based on the existing performance standard no fire station is
. required for this non-residential zone •.
FUNDING
*
**
**
** Based on the proposed non-residential fire service performance
standard, the construction schedule for Fire Station No. 5 shall be
required to be accelerated so that construction wfll begin to assure
an opening date projected for early 1989.
-103-
-
FIRE
I. PERFORMANCE ·s TANDARD
No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five
minute response time.
Special Considerations
Zone 5 is comprised exclusively of non-residential uses.
Since it does not include any residential uses, the performance
standard does not apply. The Growth Management Program does not
identify a Fire service performance standard for non-residential
uses. However, as discussed in the attached memorandum (See
Appendix 8) the City's Fire Chief recommends that a Fire service
performance standard be adopted for the non-residential uses in
Zone 5. The suggested Fire service performance standard would
require the construction of a fire station based on the following
three thresholds:
(1) The daily workforce in a non-residential area exceeds
12,000 people.
(2) The area is beyond the five minute response time for
fire protection.
( 3 ) The Fire Department
gallons per minute
less.
is
of
unable to provide 1,000
fire flow in 10 minutes or
Staff is recommending as part of this zone plan that a
Fire Service Performance Standard as outlined in this section be
adopted.
III. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 5 is currently served by Fire Station No. 2 located
at 1906 Arenal Road and Fire Station No. 4 located at 6885
Batiquitos Road. A large portion of the zone is not within five
minutes of either of these two stations as shown on the exhibit
on Page 99.
B. Phasing
Zone 5 currently has 4,256,609 square feet of industrial,
commercial and office uses. This ls approximately 191 of the
total buildout of this Zone. A recent Planning Department Survey
of all businesses within Zone 5 revealed that 7,820 people work
on a daily basis within Zone 5. This equates to approximately
one person for every 544 square feet of building.
-104-
-
Based on the phasing program that has been developed for
this Zone plan, committed projects will result in an addition81
954,530 square feet of development every year. This will result
in an additional work force population of 1,775 on an annual
basis. Wit~in two years the workforce population will exceed
12,000.
tlased on this ratio of one worker per 544 square feet of
structural footage and a buildout· of Zone 5 of 22,196,299 square
feet of development, a workforce can be estimated to exceed
40,000 people. This workforce figure is only an estim~te based
on the existing ratio of development to the existing workforce.
Although, often as industrial parks mature, they tend to shift
from manufacturing and warehousing toward more employee intensive
office and research and development type uses.
c. Adequacy Findings
The adequacy findings section will follow a format
consistent with the proposed performance standard and be based
upon meeting this recommended standard.
Work-force Population
At the present time there are presently 7,826 people who
work in Zone 5 on a daily basis. This work-force population was
obtained by a field study conducted by staff. This work-force
population is less than that defined on threshold number one of
the proposed non-residential fire service performance standard.
Fire Response Time
Zone 5 is presently served by Fire Station No. 2 which is
located at 1906 Arenal Road and Fire Station No. 4 which is
located at 6885 Batiquiotos Road. The portion of Zone 5, located
south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Palomar Oaks Way lies
within the 5 minute response time of Fire Station No. 2. The
western portion of Zone 5 is located within the 5 minute response
time of Fire Station No. 4. The remainder of Zone 5 is outside
of the 5 minute response time of any existing Fire station in
Carlsbad. The exhibit on Page 99 shows the portions of Zone 5
that are outside of the 5 minute response time.
Fire Flow (1,000 GPM)
As mentioned above, the Fire Chief indicates that the Fire
Department currenty is not able to provide fire service to much
of the already developed portions of Zone 5 within 5 minutes.
Nor is the Fire Department currently able to meet the recommended
fire flow requirements of 1,000 gallons per minute of fire flow
in 10 minutes. The Fire Department would need three engine
-105-
-companies on
gallons per
companies in
Zone 5 within
the scene in less than 10 minutes to provide 1,000
minute of fire flow. Only two of the four enoine
Carlsbad could currently reach the development in
10 minuies.
Adequacy Findings Summary
Based upon the proposed Fire Service Performance Standard
two of the three thresholds to measure compliance cannot be made
within Zone 5. These are the five minute response time and
necessary fire flow requirements. The only threshold measure
which does not exceed the proposed standard is that of work-force
population. However, based upon the projected phasing, it is
anticipated that all three thresholds will be exceeded by early
19&9. At that time it will be necessary to increase the fire
service provided to Zone 5.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions
Staff is recommending that the construction schedule of
the proposed Safety Center, Fire Station No. 5 be accelerated.
The construction of this station would be required to begin in
early 1988 with an opening date projected for January 1989.
The financing of this proposed mitigation could be
accomplished in two ways.
1. The City Council could include Fire Station No. 5 in
the 1987-1988 CIP Budget. This would enable
construction of Station No. 5 to begin in early, 1988
with an opening date projected for January, 1989.
2. Developers within Zone 5 could be required to enter
into an agreement with the City of Carlsbad for the
construction of Fire Station No. 5. This aqreement
would require the developers within Zone 5 to fund
the construction of Station 5. The construction of
this station would be required to start in early 1988
with an opening date projected for January, 1989.
Developers may be required to pay for the cost of
operating expenses incurred as a result of
accelerating the construction schedule of Fire
Station No. 5.
The proposed performance standard for Fire protection of
non-residential property was not included in the Citywide
Facilities and Improvement Plan. However, based on the Fire
Departments memo contained within Appendix 8, there is ample
-106-
--
justification to create a performance standard for non-
residential development. Most of the development within Zone 5
cannot comply with the proposed standard. It is recommended that
if Fire Station No. 5 is not constructed by Januaq', 1989, no
further building permits be issued within Zone 5.
-107-
108
OPEN SPACE
-LOCAL. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
EXISTING *
* APPROVED
C, z -en
c(
J: a..
FUTU.RE
*
OPEN SPACE
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Cu.luin•a w/Standard)
* YES
* YES
* YES
MITIGATION
N/A
N/A
N/A
FUNDING
N/A
N/A
N/A
* Zone 5, as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
will conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the
Zone builds out.
-109-
OPEN SPACE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen percent of the
e~clusive of environmentally
must be set aside for permanent
concurrent with development.
total land area in the zone
constrained non-developable land
open space and must be available
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan it was determined that certain areas of the
City are already developed or meet or exceed the requirements for
Open Space and, therefore, an analysis is not needed in the local
plan. This includes Zones 1 through 10, as well as, 16. Zone 5
is an infill zone. Approximately 38 per~ent of Zone 5 is vacant.
Of thls vacant area only 13 percent is without any existing
development approvals. Since Zone 5 is almost completely built
out, or has approved but undeveloped projects, the opportunity to
create future permanent open space is reduced. Because Zone 5
currently complies with the open space performance standard and
the opportunity to create future permanent open space is reduced,
-the open space facility for Zone 5 needs no further analysis.
The open space in Zone 5 falls into three categories: (1)
68.2 acres designated as open space on the Land Use Element of
the General Plan; (2) mini parks and par courses; and (3)
expanded landscaped setbacks (50 foot minimum) along major
streets and local streets (35 foot minimum)
B. Phasing
Because Zone 5
with the open space
limited opportunity
requirements for Open
Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2)
c. Adequacy Findings
is an infill zone which is in compliance
performance standard and because there is
to increase open space, the phasing
Space were not addressed as required by
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that the adopted performance
standards for Open Space in Zone 5 have already been met.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 5
There are no special conditions which apply at this time.
-110-
B. Financing
Future development within Zone 5 will create additional
mini parks and par courses as well as expanded setbacks along
major and local streets. It . has been assumed that this
development will continue to provide required open space.
Therefore, financing was not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
-111-
112
SCHOOLS
EXISTING
• ELEMENTARY
• JUNIOR HIGH
• HIGH SCHOOL
~
0 ELEMENTARY
□ JUNIOR HIGH
6 HIGH SCHOOL
ZONE 5
SCHOOLS
ZONE 5
COS!•
Do
I
\ ' ' '
0
........ ,
' ' \
CltyolC.IHad
GrowtPI ~ ~oar•m
JANUARY 1887
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-113 -
BUILDOUT
LOCAL .FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5
SCHOOLS
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccnu.11w.,. wlStandard) MITIGATION
EXISTING * * YES N/A
* * YES N/A
APPROVED
C, z -en
< J: a.
FUTURE * * YES N/A
FUNDING
**
**
**
* The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated that there is and
will continue to be capacity to meet the school demands generated from
Zone 5.
** School fees will be collected at a ratio of $.25/Sq. Ft. of non-
residential building area. These fees are anticipated to be adequate
and will be used for the construction or reconstruction of new school
facilities as required.
-114-
SCHOOLS
I. PERFORMANCE STAND~RD
School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within
the Zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be
provided prior to projected occupancy.
I I. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 5 falls completely within the boundaries of the
Carlsbad Unified School District. The Zone is comprised
exclusively of industrial and commerial uses. Although there are
no residential uses within Zone 5, industrial and commercial uses
have historically generated some demand for school facilities.
This demand is a function of convenience or necessity for
households with two working parents, whereby employees within the
Zone opt for schooling for their children within close proximity
to their workplace. The school generation factor for non-
residential uses, is not quantifiable. However, the State
Government Code Section 53080(b) requires that all new commercial
and industrial development pay a school fee in the amount of $.25
per square foot of building area. This fee is to be used for the
construction or reconstruction of school facilities necessary to
meet the needs of future development.
The Carlsbad Unified School District has reviewed the
proposed·Local Facilities Management Plan and has indicated their
ability to serve the needs of future develop~ent within Zone 5.
B. Phasing
The following table provides an approximation of the
anticipated school fees to be generated through buildout of the
Zone. The table is broken down into (A) existing development,
(b) approved development and (c) future development. As noted
earlier, all non-residential development shall be required to pay
a school fee of $.25 per square foot of building area.
School Fees
Total Sg. Ft. FEE Generated
Existing Development 4,256,609 * *
Approved Development 9,545,303 $.25 $2,386,325.75
Future Devlopment 8,394,387 $.25 $2,098,596.75
Total 22,196,299 $4,484,922.50
*Ho school fees collected from non-residential uses prior to
January 1, 1987.
-115-
-
--
c. Adequacy Findings
The Carlsbad Unified School· District is currently
providing capacity for the existing demand generated by Zone 5.
The School District has indicated its ability to provide capacity
to the ultimate buildout of Zone 5.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Financing
Future development will continue to pay school fees and no
financing options are necessary. The Carlsbad School District
has indicated that they can accommodate the additional students
generated in Zone 5. The school fees collected will be utilized
for the construction or reconstruction of new school facilities
as required.
-116-
117
SEWER SYSTEM
.-
CARLSBAD
ZONE 5
ZONES
SEWER DISTRICTS
!'"'"""! : : : : • 5 lnnn111111•u1 ~ . . • ! ! _ ..................... , :
I SAN MARCOS : .......
\ 1h11. .s
LEUCADIA COUNTY
cos,.
0 llYf NHAIN
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-118-
.... ....
\D
)
ZONE 5
)
SEWER SYSTEM
--· ,,. ,,. I
.-' I
ZONE 5B I .... ,
/ \
\
I
I
\ ZONE 5B /
PUMP STATION ~ _,,,) I
ANO FORCE MAIN \ ~ ' ~ ' t " ' I' / ,_,,/, ' / ../ , __ _
I '--✓
I ZONE 5A
BSM5
-,
~ I
I ---------~
SAN MARCOS
INTERCEPTOR BUENA INTERCEPTOR
---f//11!!,f////!!,
-----, ' -;;;,-BSM6 -,,,,.
' t,;-'
PALOMAR
BSM7 ,_ --
BSM3 BSM4
I
-
--::
(..)
m.
X :c
a,
=i
> ►
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
LOCAL-FACILITIES MAN-AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 5 .
BUILDOUT
PROJECTION DEMAND
*
EXISTING
**
*
APPROVED
C, ** z -"' < J: '* Ii.
FUTURE
**
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Co•n--=e w/8tanda,d)
** YES
** NO
** NO
MITIGA-TION
N/A
See
Page
123
See
Page
123
* Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity.
** Demand and capacity analysis for critical reaches of the Buena
Sanitation and San Marcos Interceptors are shown on Page 125.
-120-
FUNDING
N/A
See
Page
123
See
Page
123
SEWER COLLECTION
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Trunk line
appropriate sewer
development.
capacity
district
to meet demand as determined by the
must be provided concurrent with
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Zone 5 lies entirely within and is served by the City of
Carlsbad Sewer Service District.
A. Facility Inventory and Description
Zone 5, is comprised of primarily industrial land centered
along Palomar Airport Road. The Zone, for analysis purposes, has
been divided into two primary drainage ·basins. Basin SA,
comprising the majority of the Zone, flows into the Encinas
Canyon area paralleling -Palomar Airport Road. This basin is
served by Buena and San Marcos Interceptors shown on Exhibit AA,
Paye 119. These major reqional interceptors are joint facilities
constructed by the Buena Sanitation District and the San Marcos
County Water District. The second basin, SB, flows to the north
into the future South Agua Hedionda Interceptor. Until
completion of this interceptor, flows from Basin 58 will be
pumped into Basin 5A to be served by the Buena and San Marcos
Interceptors.
Analysis of Zone 5 is complicated by the fact that the
Buena and San Marcos Interceptors serve several agencies as well
as Growth Manayement Zones 3, 4, 6, 10, 13, 17, 18 and 20. To
simplify the analysis only Carlsbad ownership rights in these
major interceptors will be evaluated.
B. Service Demand
Existing, committed and future service collection demands
are shown on Page 124, Sewer Demand Zone 5. Service demands have
been divided by drainage basins to facilitate the analysis of
sewer line capacity.
Facility Analysis
Analysis of the City of Carlsbad capacity in the Buena and
San Marcos (BSM) interceptors indicates that future demands
exceed capacity in Reaches BSM2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Carlsbad
Capacity of the Buena and San Marcos Interceptors, Page 125,
shows the future demands and capacities of the City of Carlsbad
in these trunks including flows from Zones 4, 6, 10, 17, 18 and
20.
-121-
Buena Interceptor
The Buena Interceptor serving Basin SA was constructed by
the Buena Sanitation District in 1963. The line varies in size
from an 18-inch pipeline at Palomar Airport Road and El Camino
Real to a 30-inch pipeline at the Encina Water Polution Control
Facility. The Buena Interceptor is owned by the Buena Sanitation
District, which has leased capacity to the City of Carlsbad and
the City of Vista. The City of Vista's lease is temporary and
will expire in the 1990's. Buena Sanitation District has a
minimum capacity of 5.6 million gallons per day (mgd) in this
interceptor and they are currently using less than 2 mgd. Flows
from the Buena Sanitation District reach this pipeline in a force
main from the Buena Pumping Station. The City of CBrlsbad has
varying capacity rights in the interceptor beginning at Palomar
Airport Road and El Camino Real with a peak capacity of 1.2 mgd
increasing to 3.0 mgd in the lower reaches of the pipeline.
San Marcos Interceptor
The San Marcos County Water District Interceptor serving
Basin SA was constructed in 1986. The City of Carlsbad owns peak
capacity rights of 5.0 mgd through the gravity section of this
pipeline. Carlsbad's ownership begins at El Camino Real near the
intersection of Camino Vida Roble and travels parallel to Palomar
Airport Road to the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility. At
the present time; there are no Carlsbad flows in this
interceptor.
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor
The South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will serve Basin 5B.
This interceptor is not yet constructed, therefore a number of
facilities are in place to pump flows from this basin into Basin
SA. In the future, when the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor is
completed, flows will be diverted into this intercepter and the
pumping stations will be abandoned.
C. Adequacy Findings
As shown on Page 125 several reaches in the Buena-San
Marcos Interceptor System have capacity exceeded at bulldout of
the Zone. To meet the standard to buildout Reaches 2, 4, S, 6, 7
and 8 require additional facilities as discussed below. Reach 2
of the Buena-San Marcos Interceptor is currently at capacity for
Carlsbad's ownership and will require. immediate mitigation.
Basin SB will be required to insure construction of the South
Agua Hedionda Trunk by the year 1995.
-122-
.
III. MITIGATION
A. Reach BSM 2
Reach BSM 2 of the Buena -San Marcos I~terceptor System
is currently flowing at Carlsbad's capacity ownership
Any further development tributary to the Reach will
the standards for sewer collection and should be
(BSM2)
rights.
violate
mitigated as follows:
1. Additional short and long term capacity should be
leased from the Buena Sanitation District and/or
2. Developers enter into an agreement to construct a
parallel collection system providing for ultimate
capacity.
Staff is currently negotiating with the District for
leased capacity which is estimated to cost $7,500 per year.
Should tt1e City and District fair to reach agreement, any further
development will be requ~red to constr~ct a parallel system to be
in operation prior to occupancy of the proposed development.
Estimated cost of the parallel interceptor is $200,000.
B. Reaches BSM 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
These reaches. are projected to exceed capacty in various
amounts as indicated on Page 125, Carlsbad Capacity in the Buena-
San Marcos Interceptor. No development should be allowed until
adequate capacity is available for the various reaches.
It is currently envisioned that it will be many years if
ever before additional capacity will be required. That
additional capacity can be obtained through leasing or
participation in a new regional interceptor. Should Carlsbad be
required to construct an independent parallel system the
estimated cost is $750,000. This would be funded through sewer
connection fees.
South Agua Hedionda Interceptor
Adequate financial mechanisms should be developed to
secure construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor from
El Camino Real to the Encina·Water Pollution Control Facility
before further development of Basin 5B is approved.
IV. Financing
Construction of adequate facilities must be secured by
developers prior to approval of further development. Payment for
facilities should include direct construction with
reimbursements, fee collections or assessments.
A financial program involving fees and assessments should
be completed for Basin 5B to ensure completion of the South Agua
Hedionda Interceptor by 1995 prior to approval of further
development.
-123-
)
SEWER DEHAND ZONE 5
Drainage Basin Demand Status Land Use Square Feet
Subbasin SA
Buena Interceptor Existing
Sen Marcos Commercial 33,432
Interceptor Industrial 2,984,168
Committed
Commercial 756,201
Industrial 7,030,447
Future
Commercial 111,078
Industrial 4,268,791
Subbasin SB
South Agua Existing
Hedionda Commercial ----
Interceptor Industrial 1,239,009
Committed
Commercial 130,680
Industrial 1,627,957
Future
Commercial ----
Industrial 3,903,440
I, EDUs Equivalent Dwelling Units
Demand (EDUs)
19
1,658
420
3,906
62
2,372
---
688
73
904
---
2,169
Demand Totals
(EDU's)
8,437
3,834
)
m
X :c
m
=i
> >
....
N
U1
Carlsbad Capacity in the Buena Interceptor and San Marcos Interceptor
(Based on 246 gallons per EDU and a peaking factor of 2,0)
Capacity Existing and Projected Flows
EDUs EDUs
Section Buena San Marcos Total Exist Approved 6 Future 7 Exist
Interceptor Interceptor
BSH 1 2,439 ---2,439 7961 2, 105 I 2,420 ---
BSH 2 2,642 ---2,642 2,261 4,126 4,659 ---
BSH 3 ---10,163 10,163 ------5,814 ---
BSH 4 2,642 10,163 12,805 2,365 7,438 l 13,525 2 ---
BSH 5 3,049 10,163 13,212 2,365 7,550 13,924 2 ---
BSH 6 4,472 10,163 14,635 2,365 8,558 16,615 3 ---
BSM 7 5,285 10,163 15,448 2,365 8,558 16,615 4 ---
BSM 8 6,098 10,163 16,261 5,430 11,653 20,237 5 ---
1 • Includes some flow from Basin SB.
2. Includes flows from Zones 6, 10, 17 and 18,
3. Includes flows from Zones 6, 10, 1 7, 18 and 20,
4. Includes flows from Zones 6. 10, 13, 17, 18 and 20.
5. Includes flows from Zones 4. 6, 10, 13, 17, 18 and 20,
6. Includes existing.
7. InclQdes existing and approved,
Deficit
Approved
---
1,484
---
---
---
---
---
---
Future
---
2,017
---
720
712
1,980
1,127
3,976
)
m
)( :::c -m
-I
m m
126
WATER SYSTEM
--
.• -
ZONE 5·
ZONE 5
WATER SERVICE DISTRICTS
/
OLIVENHAIN
:•n111111111111111
J :SAN MARCOS i ~........................... 1111 ·: = I = ... ",
1~
~ ~
JANUARY 11187
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-127-
....
N
00
I
)
EXISTING RESERVOIR
-EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
& EXISTING PRESURE REGULATING STATIONS
PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES
fci. PROPOSED PRESSURE REGULATING STATION
ZONE 1.1
ZONE .t
ZONE 5
LOCAL
. .,
I
I
. i ! ·-· .. ·-·-·-i .
ZONE 11
FACILITIES
)
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
········· I
42• •••••••••••••••• -·-·-·• ·····•· . -·-· -;········ I -\-I -• I ~--·--~ -\~ I ZONI 11,
,e·
ZONi I0
ZONE 20 t
(.11yolC.,t1blll
G,o .. , ..... _,,,....,1Pt09tl"'
JANUARY 1987
MANAGEMENT PLAN
BUILDOUT
LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN-AGE ME NT PLAN-Zone 5
WATER DISTRIBUTION -SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CaltGu•.,. wl8hnlard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING
* * YES N/A
APPROVED
C, * * YES N/A z -"' < J:
Q.
FUTURE ** ** YES N/A
* The Costa Real Water District has capacity to meet the existing
demands of Zone 5.
** All development will be conditioned to install adequate domestic
water and fire flow needs to ensure conformance with the adopted
performance standard. The Costa Real Municipal Water District
will also collect fees for capital improvements.
-129-
N/A
N/A
N/A
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
I. Performance Standard
Line
appropriate
development.
capacity to meet
water district must
demand as determined by the
be provided concurrent with
A m1n1mum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided
prior to any development.
II. Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis
A. Inventory and Description
~ater service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
independent agencies: Costa Real Municipal Water District, San
Marcos County Water District, and the 0livenhain Municipal Water
District. Water service for Zone 5 is provided entirely by the
Costa Real Municipal Water District.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those
facilities which exist or are required to be added, upgraded and
improved in order to meet the needs of future growth within their
service area. The existing and future facilities shown on map
"Water Distribution System" on Page 128 indicate the required
improvements necessary to provide domestic water and fire flows
needs for development in Zone 5.
As development occurs, certain facilities are required to
be improved, upgraded, or added to serve the buildout needs of
Zone 5. As identified by the Costa Real Municipal Water
District, these improvements will be financed by the districts
capital improvement budget. Revenue for that budqet is collected
directly from diveloper fees.
b. Phasing
The performance standard indicates that line capacity must
meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district.
The Master Plan for public water systems adopted by Costa
Real Municipal Water District indicates certain facilities
required to serve this Zone. A number of these improvements will
be required as a condition to the approval of development
projects. The owner of the affected property will be req~ired to
install adequate water facilities to serve that particular
project. The remainder of the requried improvements will be
installed either by the water district or attached to approved
assessment district improvements initiated by the City of
Carlsbad.
-130-
The Costa Real Municipal Water District will determine
which facilities are necessary when development occurs in Zone 5,
therefore no phasing is required.
C. Adequacy Findings
The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 5
conforms with the adopted performance standard. Since the water
district will condition development to install adequate domestic
water and fire flow needs as a condition to future development,
conformance with the adopted performance standards will be
maintained to the ultimate buildout of Zone 5.
I I I. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 5
All development within Zone 5 shall pay the. required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
B. Financinq
Remaining facilities and improvements in Zone 5 will be
financed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District's capital
improvement budget. Revenues for that budget are funded from
water enterprise funds charged by the district.
-131-
132
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
(_
-133-
(
ADT Average daily
daily vehicle trips
associated region.
GLOSSARY
trips.
generated
A guide of average, or estimated
from a specific project or
APN Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal
description which specifically identifies each parcel of land.
Buildout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely
developed with all associated public facilities in place.
Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district established
to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These
bridge improvements are at I-5, Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia
Lane, and La Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125.
CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program.
Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the
broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located
adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned.
Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone,
quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard.
DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit.
EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage
generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and
industrial developments are also converted into EDU's to assess
their direct impact upon facilities.
Environmentally Constrained Lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways,
other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes
greater than 25%, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major
powerline easements.
134
C
General Plan Density Ranges
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
-Residential Low
-Residential Low-Medium
-Residential Medium
-Residential Medium-High
-Residential High
Growth Management Control Point
0 -1.5
0 -4.0
4.0 -8.0
8.0 -15.0
15.0 -23.0
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
1. 0
3.2
6.0
11 • 5
19.0
Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each
designation or the midpoint of the density range.
ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of
traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to
the capacity of an intersection.
Level of Service The relative level of operation of an
intersection or traffic signal.
Level of
Service
(LOS)
A
B
Description
Free flow (relatively). If signalized,
conditions are such that no approach
phase is fully utilized by traffic and
no vehicle waits through more than one
red indication. Very slight or no delay.
Stable flow. If signalized, an occa-
sional approach phase is fully utilized;
vehicle platoons are formed. This level
is suitable operation for rural design
purposes. Slight delay.
135
ICU
Value
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
C
C
Level of
Service
(LOS)
C
D
E
F
Description
Stable flow of operation. If signalized,
drivers occasionally may have to wait
through more than one red indication.
Acceptable delay.
Approaching unstable flow or operation;
queues develop, but are periodically
cleared. Tolerable delay.
Unstable flow or operation; the inter-
section has reached ultimate capacity;
this condition is not uncommon in peak
hours. Congestion and intolerable delay.
Forced flow or operation. Intersection
operates below capacity.
ICU
Value
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.00+
Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87.
MGD Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of
water or sewage.
Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% _c_o_n_s_t,_r_a_i_n_e_d-,-_a_c_r_e_s_ and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40%
slopes. Industrial and commercial development were then
multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all
regulations which affect overall lot coverage).
Open Space Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned
residential development (PRO), common areas, tennis courts, or
other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities,
such as major power line easements.
PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of
building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes.
PFF -Public Facility Fee. A 2.5% fee paid prior to the issuance
~ building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for
the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and
equipping public property, improvements, and facilities.
136
C
(_
C.
Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only
one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool,
etc.
TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building
permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City
is divided into two fee categories: 1) The La Costa area and 2)
the remainder of the City. See Exhibit T, on Page 126.
Turn Key Facility -a facility constructed by developer(s) and
turned over or dedicated to the City after its completion.
137
(_
C
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
5
POINSETTIA LN ,.
1111111 AREA BOUNDARY
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-138-
--•~-MELROSE AVE
CllyolC••-
Qrowtf'I Maneoam• Proa,am
II
JANUARY 1887
C
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY
ZONE 5
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
-139-
~~MELROSE
"~~7 AVE
Clly ol C•IINII
O,owH1 Manaoeffieftl llroo,am
n
JANUARY 1987
APPENDIX 2
-140-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 ii
I' 181 1
11
19 !I
20/i
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'1PDINANCE NO. 9808 -----
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF
CAFL~BAD, CALIFOP~IA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD ~UNICIPAL C0DE RY. THE ADnITION OF
CHAPTER 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGE~1f.~JT
PROGRAM FOR THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition of
Chapter 21.90 to read as follows:
Sections:
21.90.010
21.90.020
21.90.030
21.90.031
21.90.032
21.90.033
21.90.040
21.90.050
21.90.060
21.90.070
21.90.080
21.90.090
21.90.100
21.90.110
21.90.120
21.90.125
21.90.130
21.90.140
21.90.150
21.90.160
21.90.170
21.90.180
21.90.190
"Chapter 21.90
Growth Management
Purnose and intent.
Definitions.
General prohibition, exceptions.
Tolling of time for consideration of
applications submitted before the effective
date of this chapter.
Tolling of expirition of previou~ly issued
development permits.
Extensions of prior approvals prohibited.
Comoliance with this· chapter required.
Establishment of local facilities management
fee.
Special provisions for buildinq pe~its
issued during temporary moratoriuro.
Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imposed by sections
21.90.050 and 21.90.060.
Performance standard.
Citywide facilities and improvements plan.
Local facilities management zones.
Contents of local facility management plans.
Facilities management olan preoartion.
Facilities management plan processing.
Implementation of facilities and
improvements requirements.
Obiigation to pay fees or install
improvements required by any other law.
Implementing guidelines.
Exclusions.
Council actions, fees, notice.
Expiration of chapter.
Severability.
1.
141
I 'I
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
i, 181)
1911
20 Ii
21
22
2:3
24
25
26
21.90.010 Puroose and intent.
(a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to:
(1) Provide cruality housincr opportunities for all
economic sectors of the community;
(2) Provide a balanced community with adeauate
commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to
support the residential areas of the City;
(3) Ensure that public facilities and i~provements
meeting City standards are available concurrent with the need
created by new development;
(4) Balance the housinq needs of the reqion
against the public service needs of C~rlsbad residents and
available fiscal and environmental resources;
· (5) Encourage infill development in urbanized
areas before allowina extensions of public facilities and
improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized;
(6) Ensure that all development is consistent with
the Carlsbad qeneral plan;
(7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public
facilities and· imorovements are provided in a phased and logical
fashion as reauired by the general plan: .-
(8) Control of the timing and location of
development by tyinq the pace of development to the provision of
public facilities and improvements at the times established by
the citywide facilities and improvements plan.
(b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined despit• previous City Council actions including but
not limited to, arnendroents to the land use, housing, and parks
and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City
Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic imoact fees, and
modification of park dedication and improvement requirements,
that the demand for facilities and improvements has outpaced the
supply resulting in shortages ~n public facilities and
improvements, includinq but not limited to streets, parks, open
space, schools, libraries, drainage faGilities and general
governmental facilities. The City Council has further determine
that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet
and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad.
(c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the
implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to
eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure
that no development occurs without providing for adeauate
facilities and improvements, to regulate the pace of development
thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of
years and to continue the auality of life for all economic
sectors of the Carlsbad community.
(d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and
objectives established herein by reauirinq identification of all
public facilities and improvements required for development, by
prohibiting development until adequate provisions for the public
facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects
within the City, and by giving development priority to areas of
the City where public facilities and improvements are already in
place (infill areas).
2.
142
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
81
11
12.
13
14!
15
161 II
17 ii ,, ,,
18 ii
ii
19 ij
11·
2011
'I
21 ti
22 !1
23
24
i
2s Ii
2e ii II
27 ii
Ii
28 ii
I
I
(e) This chapter replaces the temporary moratorium on
processing and approval of develop~ent projects imposed bv City
Council Or~inance No. 9791.
21.90.020 Definitions.
(a) Whenever the following terms are used in this
chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section
unless from the context it is apparent that another meanino is
intended: ·
(1) "Citywide facilities and improvements plan"
means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.090
identifying those facilities and improvements required on a
citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as
established by the general plan and providing an outline and
budget for financing certain facilities and improvements which
will be provided by the City.
(2) "Development permit" means any permit,
entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial
issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative
actions such as zone chanqes, general plan amendments, or master
plan approval or amendment.
(3) "Development" means any use to which land is
put, building or other alteration of land and construction
incident thereto.
( 4) "Fae i 1 it ies" means any schools, parks, open
space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire,
library, or govern~ental services; identified in a facilities
management plan.
(5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls,
streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks,
bridges, overcrossings, street interchanqes, flood control or
storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and
lighting facilities.
(6) "Local facilities management plan" means a
facilities management plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a
local facilities management zone which is established according
to.Section 21.90.100.
21.90.030 General rohibition, exce tions.
a Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter
no application for any building permit or development permit
shall be accepted, processed or approved until a citywide
facilities and improvements plan has been adopted and a local
facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities
management zone has been submitted and approved according to thi
chapter.
(b) No zone change, general plan amendment, master pla
amendment or specific plan amendment which would incease the
residential density or development intensity established by the
general plan in effect on the effective date of this chapter
shall be approved unless an amendment to the citywide facilities
management plan and the applicable local facilities management
plan has first been approved.
3.
143
C
C
ii
I
l
21
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
l4j
isl I
I 161
I
171
:I I,
18 i
I
19 I
2011
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I
281
'
(c) The classes of projects or pernits listed in this
subsection shall be exempt from the provisions of subsection (a).
Development permits and building permits for these projects
·shall be subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywide
facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local
facilities management plan.
(1) Redevelopment projects.
(2) Projects consisting of the construction or
alteration of a single dwelling structure for a family on a lot
owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not
to exceed one nonowner-occupied house per individual for one or
more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986.
(3) Building permits and final maps for proiects
identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects· for
which construction had commenced and were desiqnated on the map
marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 "as developing").
(4) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or approved on or before
January 21, 19-86. If all reauired development pernits were.
issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall
apply to that portion.
(5) Building pernits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or approved before July
20, 1986 and for which building permits could .have been issued
under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development permits
were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption
shall apply to that portion.
(6) Commercial and industrial projects with
approved develop~ent permits or with a complete application on
file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. N~w
permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an
area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be
processed and approved.
· ( 7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures
and uses for youth recreational, educational or guidance programs
such as boys and girls clubs or private schools.
(8) Zone changes or general plan amendments
necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and
zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or
which the City Council finds will not increase the public
facilities or services and which are initiated by the City
Council or Planning Commission.
(9) Public utility facilities and improvement
projects without accommodations for permanent employees are
exempt from the provisions of this chapter unless the City
Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to
impact public facilities. ·
(10) Adjustment plats.
(11) Development permits for minor subdivisions
located in the northwest quadrant of the City as defined in
Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or
industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may be
approved. Residential building permits will not be approved for
lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this
4.
144
C
3J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14(
15 I
16i
I 171
1sij
1,
19 ~I
2oli
1!
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot may be
approved for each such subdivision.
(d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final
.maps and other developrr,ent permits for projects with a tentative
map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the
exemptions listed in subsection (c).
(1) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was
approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of
the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel map ~ay be
processed and approved before the adoption of a local facility
management plan. The expiration period for those tentative maps
shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The
expiration of any development permits issued in conjunction with
those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities
management plan is approved or, two years after the date the
citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
(2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa
approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th
approv 1.i. of fi.nal map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance
No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is
prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local
facilities management plan. The expiration period of those
tentative maps and tentative parcel maps, and any other
development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be
tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved,
or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements
plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
(e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c
(3), (4), (5), and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1988. Aftertha
date all development permits for those projects shall be fully
subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for
projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall
apply only so long as the facilities and improvements required a
a condition to the issuance of final development permits have
been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured
agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement agreement
shall subject any remaining building permits for the project to
the provisions of subsection (a).
(f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in
subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all
the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this
Code which were fil.ed with the City before July 20, 1986 may be
approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate,
after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be
subject to the exemption of subsection (c).
(g) The City Council may authorize the processing of
and decision making on building permits and development permits
for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986
subject to the following restrictions:
(1) The City Council finds that the facilities an
improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to meet
the needs created by the project and that the master plan
developer has agreed to install those facilities and improvement
to the satisfaction of the City Council.
s.
145
l
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 1
15
16
17
18
19
20 Ii
21il
11
221
2:3
24
25
26
27
28
(2) The master plan developer shall agree in
writing that all facilities and improvement requirements,
including but not limited to the payment of fees established bv
the citywide facilities and manaqement plan and the applicable·
local facilities management plan shall be applicable to
development within the master plan area and that the master plan
developer shall comply with those plans.
(3) The master plan establishes an educational
park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of
the educational facility.
(4) Building permits for the 129 unit residential
portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the
applicant has provided written evidence that an educational
entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council
finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent 0
the approved master plan.
(5) Prior to the approval of the final map for
Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to
participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and
wetland resour·ce area and made any dedications of. property.
necessary to accomplish the restoration.
(h) After making the findings in paragraph 1 the City
Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on
master plans subject to the reauirements of paragraph 2. After
the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the
tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the
commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may
also be processed and approved. If such approvals a_re granted
and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and
building permits for construction of the golf course and first
phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed
and approved. ·
The processing and approval of all other developments
and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti
after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities
management plan have been adopted by the City Counci 1.
(l)(i) That the master plan will provide all
necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any
facilities deficits in the area affected by the project.
(ii) That the approval will not prejudice the
preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the
level of public facilities and services in the area.
(iii) That by the dedication of land and the
construction of public improvements the project will make a
significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the
city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of
si9nificant environmental resources.
(2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the
information required by and implementing the provisions of
Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the
master plan.
(ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that al
facilities and improvement requirements, including but not
limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide
6.
146
C.
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
81
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
I
161
171.
1811
19 Ii
20/1
21
22
23
24
25
26
~n I
28
facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local
facilities management plan shall be applicable to development
within the master plan area and that the master plan developer
shall comply with those requirements. .
(iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to
participate in the restoration of a significant laqoon and
wetland resource area. -'
(iv) Prior to any processing on the master plan
the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessary
for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for the
widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino
Real.
21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of
applications sub~itted before the effective date of this
chapter.
After approval of the citywide facilities and
improvement plan and the applicable local facilities manaqement
plan applicati9ns for development permits which were accepted as
complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have
processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date.
Until the approval of the plans all a?plicable time limits for
processing the development permits shall be tolled.
21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of previously issued
development permits.
If a discretionary development permit, other than a
development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map,
issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within
which building permits must be issued and the issuance of
building permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter
then the expiration period shall be tolled until the aoplicable
local facilities management pla·n is approved, or two years after
the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
21.90.033 Extensions of erior alprovals erohibited.
After approval of an applicable ocal facilities
management plan an extension of the expiration date of any
development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is
found to be consistent with the plan. The decision making body
considering an extension may condition the extension upon
compliance with the citywide plan and applicable local
facilities management plan.
21.90.040 Com liance with this cha ter.
a No development permit sha 1 be approved unless the
approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the
citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable
local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the
approving authority may impose any condition to the approval
necessary to implement the plans.
(b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees
required by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities
management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consisten
7.
147
(_
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12.
13
14
15
16 1 I
l7j
" ,.
1811 I'
1!
19 Ii
20 II
21
22
23
24
25 I
!
2~ I
21 I
ii 281
with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a
condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to
Section 2l..90.030(c) the applicant s·hall agree to pay the
appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is
established.
(c) The requirements of this chapter are imposed as a
condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of
and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities an
improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to
or concurrently with need.
fee.
21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities management
(a) A local facilities management fee is hereby
established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in
local facilities management plan which are related to new
development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an
other fee, cha-rge or tax on development, or are not instal 1,ed by
a developer as a condition of a building permit or development
permit. •The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the
facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities
and improvements plan attributed to develoP.ment within the local
zone which are not financed by other· means. The facilities
management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building
permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th
estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as
necessary to accommodate additional development within the
applicable local facilities management zone plus the estimated
cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide
facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone.
The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development.
(b) The fee required by this section is in addition to
any other means of financing facilities or improvements
identified by a local facilities management plan or any other
tax$ fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed
on·the development of property under the provisions of state law
this code or City Council policy.
(c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities
management zone shall be set by City Council reso_lution after a
public hearing, published notice of which shall be given
according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and
Government Code Section 54992.
(d) As a condition of any building or development
permit application submitted after the effective date of this
chapter the applicant shal 1 agree to pay the fee established by
this section at the time a building permit is issued.
(e) The fee established by this section shall be levie
at the time of issuance of a building permit.
21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits
issued during tem1orary moratorium.
(a) . App icants for projects for which building permits
were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shal
8.
148
C l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18/i
19 Ii
Ii
20 Ii
2111
22
23
24
25
26
l?? I,
28
i I
I pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 days afte~
the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment
shall be made according to the agreement executed by the
applicant -pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.070 Findin of health, safetv and welfare
necessary or the fees imposed by Sections 21.9 .050 and
21.90.060.
(a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of
the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and
21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements
identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to
achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to
implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or
the facilities or improvements are not installed the public
health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be
insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new
development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No.
17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented
at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter.
(b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a
development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i
protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o
the protest.
( c) This sect ion is adopted pursuan·t to Government Cod
Section 65913.5.
21.90.080 Performance standard.
The City Council shall adopt general performance
standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section
21,90.090(b) or 21.90.ll0(c). Specific performance standards fo
citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide
facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards
for each zone shall be adopted as part of the local facilities
management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local
facilities management plan the performance standards established
by a plan are not met then no development permits or buildin·g
permits shall be issued within the local zone until the
performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the
City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have
been made.
21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and im rovements lan.
a To implement the City s general plan by securing
provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that
development does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar
available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide
facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all
facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land
uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning: specify
size, capacity and service level performance standards for the
identified facilities and improvements: establish specific time
tables for acquisition, installation and operation of the
facilities and improvements correlated to projected population
9.
149
C
6
7
8
9
I 10!
11
12
13
14
15
16i
i
171,
1aj 1
11
19 !I
2011
21 I'
I
22
23
24
25
26
271
28
growth, facility and improvement performance standards, and
projected nonresidential development; identify the financing
method or methods for each facility and improvement; and
establish -a facility and improvement budget for those faci 1 it ies
or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the
City. The plan shall encourage infill development and reduce the
growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or
improvements to undeveloped areas by establishing priorities for
facility and improvement installation or financing.
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan shall
show how and when the following facilities and improvements will
be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c).
(1) Major sewage transmission systems and sewage
treatment plants;
(2) Major water transmission lines;
(3) Major area wide drainage facilities;
(4) Prime and Major arterials; freeway
interchanges, bridges or overcrossings;
·-(5) Fire facilities;
(6) Governmental administration facilities;·
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities;
( 8) Libraries.
(c) The plan shall include the following information
with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsectio
( b) :
(1) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility and
improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventory
shall be consistent with the general plan and zoning for the
area.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing fo
installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space
within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the
facility and improvement performance standards.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the
plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements
which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing
a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a conditi.on
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilitie
or improvements when required by the phasing schedule.
(d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the pla
to the City Council not later than one year from the effective
date of this ordinance.
10.
150
C l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
. 11
12
131 I
14
15
16
17
181/ 'i
1·
19 If
2oli ii i"
21 !I
221
23 1
24
25 I
26
2, 1
1
I,
28
(e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and
improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the Planninq
Commissio~ or City Council.
21.90.100 Local facilities management zones.
(a) The City Council shall divide the City into
facilities management zones.
(b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established
based upon logical facilities and improvements planninq,
construction and service relationships to ensure the economicall~
efficient and timely installation of required facilities and
improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council
shall also be guided by the following considerations:
(1) Service areas or drainage basins;
(2) Extent to which facilities or improvements are
in place or available:
plan areas:
(3) Ownership of property:
(4) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans;
.. ( 5) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans:
(6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master
(7) Boundaries·of approved tentative maps:
(8) Public facilities relationships, especially
the relationship to the City's planned major circulation
network:
(9) Special district service territories:
(10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other
facilities or improvement master plans.
(c) The zones shall be established by resolution after
a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section
21.54.060(2) of this code.
21.90.110 Contents of local facility management plans.
(a) A local facilities management plan shall be
prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone.
(b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, an
narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and
zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan
approval. The local facilities management plan shall be
consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan
shall implement the citywide facilities and improvements plan
within the zone.
(c) The facilities management plan shall show how and
when the following facilities and improvements necessary to
accommodate development within the zone will be installed or
financed as specified in subsection (d).
(1) Sewer systems
(2) Water
(3) Drainage
(4) Circulation
(5) Fire facilities
(6) Schools
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities
(8) Open space
11.
151
C
C,.
..
l
2
3
4
5'
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 ,,
14
15
161
171
I
1811
19 Ii
2011
21 I'
22
23
24,
25 I
26 I
2711
'i
2a I
,I
(d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement the
citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall
include the following information with regard to each facility
and improvement listed in subsection (c):
(1) An inventory of present and future
reauirements for each facility and improvement based upon the
performance standard established for each facility. Because
improvement reauirements for certain facilities and improvements
may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for
coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities
extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost
estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development
in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvements
capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in
other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the
performance standard which is established pursuant to Section
21.90.080. The growth inducing impact of the out of zone
improvements shall be assessed.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for
installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space,
etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule
shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not
utilize more than 'the area's prorata share of facility or
improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity
is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first
development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of
development within the zone and a market data and. cash flow
analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the
zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the
demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity
and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those
situations when demand exceeds capacity and it is not feasible t
increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall
occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the
capacity is established in the plan.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the pla
fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the
zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and ir.lprovements
which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing
a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for which
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide
facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule
Where facilities or improvements are reauired for more than one
zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the
plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however,
shall not require identical funding methods.
12.
152
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
91
10
11
12.
13
14i ·
151
l6i
I 171
11 1s1t ii
19 Ii
Ii 2011 ,,
21 ii
I
22
23
24
25 I
26
27 I ,I
2s lj
I
(4) A list or schedule of facilities recuirements
correlated to individual development projects within the zone.
(~) The local facilities management plan shall
establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities and
improvements identified in the citywide facilities and
improvement plan attributable to development of property on the
local facilities management zone.
21.90.120 Local facilities management plan
preparation.
(a) A local facilities management plan may be prepared
by the City or by the property owners within the zone accordina
to the procedures established by this section.
(b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may by
resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities
management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the
cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a
hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the property
owners within the zone. The cost shal 1 be spread prorata
according to acreage and development potential.
·(c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a
facilities management plan.
(d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie
management plan is shown to be not. feasible any owner or group o
cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council
to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte
a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given
to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may
permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the
plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be
determined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be
determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed prorat~
based on acreage and development potential to property within th~
facilities management zone. The assessment shall be collected b
the City at the time any application for a development project
within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared
the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the
owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be mad
unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not
include interest.
(e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group
of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may
decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities
management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to
the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all the
owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d).
a Fac1 1t1es management pans
according to the following procedure:
rocessin •
be reviewed
(1) A completed facilities management plan
complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing
in an amount established by City Council resolution, may be
submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the
13.
153
fee
C
(_
\
I l!
I 2j
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 I
11
12
l:3
14
15
16
17
18
I,
19 !I
2011 ,i
'I
211
221
23
24
25
26
Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the
provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a
facilities.management plan for public hearing before the Planning
Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete
application.
(2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the
provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containina
recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to· the
public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the
hearing.
(3) The Planning Commission shall hear and
consider the application for a facilities manage~ent plan and
shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the
City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with
the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within
the facility zone.
(4) When the Planning Commission action is filed
with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public
hearing before .. ·the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed
according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). ·
(5) The City Council shall hear the matter, and
after considering the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny
facilities management plan. The City Council may -include in the
resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or
facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to
impose on development projects within the zone in order to
implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the
local facilities management plan.
(b) A facilities management plan may be amended
following the same procedures for the original adoption. ~
(c) A local facilities management plan shall be
considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code.
Environment~l documents should be processed concurrently with th
plan.
21.90.130 Im lementation of facilities and improvement
reouirements.
(a) To ensure that the provisions of this chapter and
the general plan are met the following shall apply:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter n
development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is
consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless
provision for all facilities and improvements related to the
development project are provided or funded.
(2) No building permit shall be issued unless all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities
fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees,
facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewe
fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the
citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities
management plan and adopted by the City Council have first been
paid or provision for their payment has been made to the
satisfaction of the City Council.
14.
154
1
2
I
3!
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
111
12/
131
i,
14
15
I
16 1
17
1a I
1,
19 !I
20!! !I
21 Ii I,
22
23
24
25 I
26
27 !I
11
281
(bl The citywide facilities and improvement plan and
the local facility management plan process is part of the City's
ongoing pl_anning effort. It is anticipated that amendments to
the plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management
plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any
particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular
development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements
plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to
ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or
improvements will be available to meet demands created by
development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any
of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that
an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and
improvements.
(c) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of
the City Manager that facilities or improvements within a
facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate
any further development within that zone or that the performance
standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being met
he shall immediately report the deficiency to the Council.· If
the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further
building or development permits shall be issued within the
affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an
amendment to. the citywide facilities and improvements plan or
applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the
deficiency is approved by the City Council and the performance
standard is met.
(d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen
activity for each local facilities management zone and shall
prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps,
graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a
developmental activity analysis, a facilities and improvements
adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and
recommendation for any amendments to the facilities management
plan. The content of the annual report shall be established by
the City Council.
(e) The City Council shall annually ,review the citywid
facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the
City's capital improvement budget.
21.90.140 Obligation to pay fees or install
improvements required by any other law.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as
relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public
improvement requirement, dedication requirement or fee
requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21
of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy.
21.90.150 Implementing guidelines.
The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems
necessary to implement this chapter.
21.90.160 Exclusions.
(a) Development proposals which consist of facilities,
15.
155
C 1,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
161
17
18 i
19 !I
20 Ii
211
221
23
24
25
26
27
I
2sl
or structures constructed by a city, county, special district,
state, or federal government or any agency, department, or
subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded from
the provi~ion~ of this chapter. This exclusion shall not applv
to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax would
be applicable.
(b) Tentative maps the application for which was
accepted before August 6, 1985 roay be approved without complying
with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other
development permits or building permits for the project shall be
subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map
shall be subject to Section 21.90.030.
21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice.
(a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an
action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision
shall be accomplished by a resolution.
(b) The City Council shall establish ap?lication and
processing fee.s for the submission and processing of facilities
management plans and for any other request made under Section
21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140.
(c) Whenever written notice is required to be given
to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed
by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll.
21.90.180 Expiration of chapter.
This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless it is
extended or reenacted on or before that date.
21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this
chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council
declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in thi
chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phras
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following
findings:
l. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been
undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of it
General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed
Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and
recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council
Included in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were
recommendations that no new development should occur unless
16.
156
C
ll
21
I 3:
41
I 5'
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
' 141 1
i
1s 1
I
16i
I 171
1a!I
I:
19 Ii
1:
2011 !I
211!
22
2:3
24
25
26
27
28
adequate public facilities are available concurrently with need
to serve the new development.
2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interi~
Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls
on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation
of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the
restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. on
December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several
land use proposals not contained in the Citizens-Committee .
report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency
Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development
approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. on
April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No.
17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic
impact fee fo~ the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council
finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure
adequate public facilities are available to serve any new
development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the
requirements imposed by it, adequate public facilities may not b
available to serve new development or building. Development or
building without public facilities is contrary to the City
General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and
safety.
3. This action of the City Council is consistent with
long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure
adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of
Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and
drainage facilities, sufficient fire protection and recreation
facilities.
4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to
provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the
community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing
continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not
affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition,
development of housing for low and moderate income persons and
families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are
designated for highest development priority. By encouraging
development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is
already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced.
5. Because any new development affects public facility
availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic
will be used to provide public facilities on any new building inl
the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and
charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect th.
public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's !
streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and firr
17.
157
C l
2
3
4
5
6
7
81
9
10
11
12
13
14j
151
l6i
I
171 I
I
I' 1s11
11
19 11
11 2011
21 Ji
221
23
24
25
26
27 I
I
28
facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and
recreational facilities.
6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not adversely affect
the regional welfare. By ensuring that adequate and safe public
facilities and improvements will exist to serv-e all of the
development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and
improvements are used by ~ersons residing in neighborinq areas
and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is
enhanced.
SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the
growth management program contained in Chapter 21.90 by following
the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this
ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without
..
amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplis
effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
_thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a
least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
adoption._
ordinance shall be effective as to building permits for single o~
I
The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this
multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of
this ordinance.
Carlsbad City Council held on the
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the j
24th day of June
1986 and thereafter
18.
158
C
c ...
l
2
31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s1i
1!
19 11
2 oli
211
22
23
24
25
26
27
I
2sl
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the 1st day of __ J_u~l~y ____ , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
V
ATTEST:
AYES: Council Members Casler. Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
AS TO F~RM D LEGALITY
City Attorney
19.
159
:ASLER, Mayor
CULSBAD Ciff COO■CIL GROIITB NA■AGBNB■~ PLA■
•■ana9in9 a •••poaaibl• and Pro9reaai•• Carlabad Putare•
.I. Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan
A. Growth Control Mapping and Planning Systems
1. The General Plan will be utilized as the overall
base map with a maximum residential utilization
i.e. mean density.
2. A citywide map will show all current a.nd future
public facilities and improvements. Each public
facility and improvement will also be shown
separately on a citywide map.
3. A citywide environmental constraints and open space
map will be prepared.
4. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants
to show greater area detail.
B. Management Performance Standards
1. Establish overall performance or. adequacy standards
for each public facility and improvement.
2. Establish thresholds for each public facility and
improvement.
c. Citywide Pinancing Options
1. Pinancing options will be identified for each
facility and improvement.
2. Budgeting for citywide public facility and
improvement will be in conjunction with the City's
five year capital improvement budget.
o. Citywide Plan
1. A Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will be
prepared using growth control maps, performance
standard ■ and financing options.
160
E. Development of Local Facility Management and Planning
zones.
1. The ·city shall be divided into 25 specific zones.
2. The size of each zone shall depend upon major
circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership
boundaries, and other identifiable characteristics.
3. The purpose of zones:
a. Requires landowners to work together in order to
present development plans in accordance with the
City's Growth Management Program.
b. Requires landowners to provide devel~pment plans
which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and
t~ relate development to adjacent zones.
c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to
development approval.
4. Each zone will have a maximum residential
utilization i.e. mean density. Specific densities
for individual development plan• within the zone,
however, will be controlled through the normal
planning process.
s. Each zone must conform to the General Plan and the
Growth Management Ordinance.
II. Facility Management Zone Processing
A. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for
procesaing concurrently with normal environmental
analysis.
B. Local facilitiea management plans shall conform to all
standard• of the Growth Control Mapping and Planning
systeaa and other existing City standards.
c. Th• local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan
to assure adequate funding of all citywide facilities
and improvements identified in the citywide plan. The
local plan shall also provide a detailed financial plan
for all public facilities and improvements located
within the local facilities management zone.
All development within the local facilities management
zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and
improvement performance standards.
D. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan
and environmental analysi• will be held concurrently.
Notice to all landowners within the zone as well as
surrounding adjacent zone landowners.
-2-
161
E. After the public hearing is completed on the local
facilities management zone and environmental analysis,
then the specific development plans will be processed in
the normal method.
P. Each local facilities management plan will be reviewed
annually by the City to ensure that all performance
standards are being met. If they are not, development
will be stopped.
6/13/86
ad
-3-
162
APPENDIX 3
C
-163-
C"
C.
1 •
2.
REFERENCE SOURCES
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad,
Revised September 29, 1986
Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June,
1980
3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad
November, 1976
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1 0.
11.
12.
June, 1984
April, 1985
Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, February,
1985
Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of
Carlsbad, June, 1982
Memo to Planning Commission from Parks and Recreation
Director, dated March 26, 1987
Circulation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad
Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works
Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984
Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987
Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987
Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991
Memo to City Manager from Fire Chief dated April 27, 1987
164
APPENDIX 4
C -165-
ZONE 5
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
APN PROJECT NAME NUMBER STREET LAND USE SQUARE
FOOTAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------213-020-18 PALOMAR AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL 76,775
213-050-13 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2175 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 3,475
213-050-24 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2225 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 17,545
213-050-24 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2245 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 31,167
213-050-24 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2265 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 24,153
213-050-47 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2270 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 102,162
213-050-08 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2310 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 42,446
213-050-08 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2320 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 43,660
213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2325 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 19,481
213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2335 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 45,241
213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2345 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 18,000
213-050-09 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2350 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 54,600
213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2355 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 8,115
I 213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2365 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 16,440 ~ 213-050-27 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2375 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 15,920 er 213-050-23 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2380 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 18,053
213-050-23 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2382 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 18,053
213-050-23 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2384 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 18,053
213-050-37 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2385 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE INDUSTRIAL 30,100
213-061-01 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6212 CORTE DBL ABETO INDUSTRIAL 71,248
213-061-12 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6352 CORTE DEL ABETO INDUSTRIAL 41,032
213-061-12 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6354 CORTE DEL ABETO INDUSTRIAL 22,965
213-080-17 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6054 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 10,899
213-080-15 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6056 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 10,607
213-080-16 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6058 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 8,500
213-080-14 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6060 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 6,334
213-080-13 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6062 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 6,060
213-080-12 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6064 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 5,384
213-080-11 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6066 CORTE DBL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 4,695
213-080-10 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6068 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 4,803
213-080-09 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6070 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 4,368
213-080-08 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6072 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 3,825
213-080-07 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6074 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 2,978
213-080-06 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6076 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 6,819
213-080-05 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6078 CORTE DEL CEDRO INDUSTRIAL 6,481
r-,..
I
APN
ZONE 5
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
PROJECT NAME NUMBER STREET LAND USE SQUARE
FOOTAGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------213-080-04
213-080-03
213-080-02
213-080-01
213-061-05
213-061-09
213-061-06
213-061-08
213-061-07
213-050-40
213-050-42
213-050-41
~209-041-23
0\212-062-12, 13
~209-050-19
209-050-25
213-020-11
213-020-14
213-050-11
213-050-22
213-050-38
213-050-28
209-041-26
212-070-20
212-070-21
212-070-21
212-070-21
212-070-21
212-070-21
212-070-21
212-061-25
212-061-25
212-061-25
212-061-25
212-061-04
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
CABLEVISION
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER
PALOMAR SOLID WASTE TRANS
OLYMPIC RESORT
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
6082
6084
6086
6088
2042
2045
2052
2055
2075
2261
2270
2271
5720
5815
5950
5960
6115
6155
6225
6305
6405
6451
2131
2185
2195
2205
2215
2225
2227
2231
2233
2235
2237
2240
CORTE DEL CBDRO
CORTE DBL CEDRO
CORTE DBL CEDRO
CORTE DBL CEDRO
CORTE DBL NOGAL
CORTE DBL NOGAL
CORTE DBL NOGAL
CORTE DBL NOGAL
CORTE DEL NOGAL
COSMOS COURT
COSMOS COURT
COSMOS COURT
EL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
EL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
BL CAMINO REAL
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
4,384
3,994
6,279
6,666
47,872
35,408
44,136
32,640
48,874
27,272
29,618
85,165
17,720
80,800
9,500
37,410
33,432
237,520
73,660
67,200
12,438
38,824
50,400
43,448
9,975
18,682
21,582
16,118
11,990
5,700
9,402
28,570
12,230
9,289
65,340
n
n '
APN
ZONE 5
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
PROJECT NAME NUMBER STREET LAND USE SQUARE
FOOTAGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------212-061-32
212-061-33
212-061-31
212-061-30
212-061-29
212-061-28
212-062-13
213-062-11
212-062-10
209-041-26
209-041-06,07
I 209-041-08
~209-041-09, 10 f 209-041-11
209-041-19
209-041-15,16
209-041-14
209-041-21
209-041-12,13
212-062-06
212-062-06
212-062-06
212-061-19
212-061-09
212-061-22
213-061-14
213-061-19
213-061-18
213-061-15
213-061-17
213-050-33
213-050-34
213-050-33
213-050-32
213-050-35
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
PALOMAR TECH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
2280
2282
2292
2310
2320
2330
2351
2386
2390
2470
2431-2433
2443-2445
2453-2455
2463-2465
2440
2441
2451
2460
2461
5962
5964
5966
5927
5928
5957
2070
2075
2077
2080
2081
2101
2120
2131
2151
2160
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
FARADAY AVENUE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
IMPALA DRIVE
LA PLACE COURT
LA PLACE COURT
LA PLACE COURT
LANDAU COURT
LANDAU COURT
LANDAU COURT
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
LAS PALMAS DRIVE
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
24,864
26,864
18,019
11,450
22,032
16,496
6,500
40,200
3,180
76,800
18,890
6,200
18,300
8,250
34,136
18,300
7,240
30,704
14,420
47,798
48,995
50,094
23,750
34,818
44,904
30,556
22,627
15,164
29,115
14,925
14,700
16,168
14,700
31,820
17,410
ZONE 5
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
APN PROJECT NAME NUMBER STREET LAND USE SQUARE
FOOTAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------213-050-31 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2221 LAS PALHAS DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 37,000
213-050-30 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2251 LAS PALHAS DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 11,600
213-050-29 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2281 LAS PALHAS DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 41,285
209-050-26 SAFETY CENTER 2560 ORION WAY INDUSTRIAL 63,376
209-041-25 FARADAY BUSINESS PARK 5731 PALMER WAY INDUSTRIAL 7,867
209-041-25 FARADAY BUSINESS PARK 5741 PALMER WAY INDUSTRIAL 11,330
209-041-05 FARADAY BUSINESS PARK 5751 PALMER WAY INDUSTRIAL 17,448
213-092-17 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 1991 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 3,267
213-092-17 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 1991 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 3,078
213-061-22 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 50,600
I 213-050-39 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2051 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 103,159
~ 213-070-14 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 34,550
1.0 213-070-13 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2121 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 34,550
I 213-070-15 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2131 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 34,550
213-070-16 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2141 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 34,550
213-070-12 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 2219 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD INDUSTRIAL 5,553
213-092-18 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 6349 PALOMAR OAKS COURT INDUSTRIAL 27,026
213-092-19 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 6350 PALOMAR OAKS COURT INDUSTRIAL 44,609
213-092-20 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 1969 PALOMAR OAKS WAY INDUSTRIAL 64,112
213-092-21 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 1979 PALOMAR OAKS WAY INDUSTRIAL 17,532
213-092-22 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 1985 PALOMAR OAKS WAY INDUSTRIAL 15,049
213-092-23 BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER 1989 PALOMAR OAKS WAY INDUSTRIAL 19,490
212-062-07 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 5931 PRIESTLY DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 45,400
212-070-16 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2221 RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 25,709
212-070-19 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2231 RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 27,761
212-061-17 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2250, RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 32,569
212-061-20 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2251 RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 33,424
212-061-18 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2258 RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 42,260
212-061-21 CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER 2261 RUTHERFORD ROAD INDUSTRIAL 21,088
213-070-03 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6110 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 22,263
213-070-02 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6150 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 14,018
213-070-01 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6190 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 17,668
213-050-04 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6200 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 59,000
213-050-19 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6211 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 40,176
213-050-19 PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK 6221 YARROW DRIVE INDUSTRIAL 40,176
ZONE 5
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
APN PROJECT NAME NUMBER STREET LAND USE SQUARE
FOOTAGE
n
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------213-050-20
213-050-20
213-050-061
213-050-21
213-050-21
I .... ......
0 I
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
PALOMAR BUSINESS PARK
6231
6241
6350
6351
6361
YARROW DRIVE
YARROW DRIVE
YARROW DRIVE
YARROW DRIVE
YARROW DRIVE
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
40,176
40,176
44,800
43,200
20,800
APPENDIX 5
-171-
ZONE 5 BUILDOUT ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS
This appendix lists and maps the improvements that will be
needed to completely develop all Circulation Element roads in
Zone 5 to their ultimate right-of-way width. Zone 5 differs from
the other infill zones since it ls basically a non-residential
area. In addition, most of the properties in Zone 5 all consist
of large parcels with significant development potential.
Zone 5:
The following Circulation Element roadways are located in
Palomar Airport Road
El Camino Real
El Fuerte Street
Camino Vida Roble
College Avenue
Faraday Avenue
Hidden Valley Road
Of the above
Fuerte Street have
right-of-way width in
listed roads only Camino Vida Roble and El
been improved to their full length and full
Zone 5.
El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road have been
constructed for their full length in Zone 5, but have not been
improved to their full right-of-way width. College Avenue ls
presently being constructed for its full right-of-way width from
El Camino Real to Palomar Airport Road. A small piece of College
Avenue within Zone 5 south of Palomar Airport Road remains to be
built. Portions of Faraday Avenue in the easterly and westerly
sections of Zone 5 have not been constructed. No portion of
Hidden Valley Road has not been constructed.
Each of the arterials within Zone 5 has been broken into
segments, as shown on map "Existing and Proposed Street
Improvements", on Page 174. This exhibit distinguishes between
fully improved and partially improved segments of the roads.
Partially improved segments have been assigned a letter.
Underneath this letter is a series of numbers and letters which
list the needed improvements on each unimproved or partially
improved section. The legend on this exhibit explains what each
of these letters signifies.
-172-
C
C
C d
The needed improvements, the approximate length of the
needed improvements, the approximate cost of the improvements and
the source of the improvements is shown on Page 64, "Needed
Arterial Improvements". This information was obtained from a
number of sources. A field survey was done by staff to determine
what improvements were needed on each partially improved segment.
The approximate length of the needed improvements was determined
by the use of maps, recent aerial photos, or actually measuring
the length of the needed improvements in the field.
The City of Carlsbad and County of San Diego have entered
into an agreement to provide a number of the needed improvements
along Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real. Under the terms
of this agreement the County will pay for the construction costs
while the City will pay for the design and project management
costs. The processing of these improvements is being handled by
the City of Carlsbad's Municipal Projects Department. It is
anticipated that these improvements may be constructed within the
next two years.
An assessment district is in the formative stages for the
full width improvement of Palomar Airport Road from Paseo del
Norte to Palomar Oaks way. The improvements are being designed
and construction could start as -soon as fall, 1987. Other
assessment districts are currently being considered and it is
highly likely that in the near future one or more assessment
district(s) will be formed to construct needed roadway
improvements in Zone 5 and in other zones impacted by traffic
generated by Zone 5.
Some of the estimated costs for road segment improvements
of Arterial roads in Zone 5 are approximations obtained by
estimating an approximate cost per linear foot for various
portions of the Circulation Element Roadway. Others are more
accurate since they have had some design work done by the
Municipal Projects Department. It should be noted that all of
the estimated costs for the needed improvements are based on 1987
costs. Future inflation rates could substantially increase the
cost of these improvements. In addition, unforseen soils
problems necessitating excessive amounts of grading could
substantially increase the cost of the needed improvments. This
is especially so for sections that need excessive amounts of
grading or remedial improvements since no detailed engineering
studies have been completed for these areas.
FINANCING ALTERNATIVES
Almost all
would eventually
impacted segments
may not be ready to
of the needed roadway improvements in Zone 5
be constructed as the property adjacent to the
develops. However, some of these properties
develop in the near future and substantial
-173-
C improvements must be constructed in the next few years to comply
with the Circulation Performance Standard. The most logical way
to finance and construct these improvements would be through the
formation of assessment districts. These assessment districts
would include properties within Zone 5 as well as properties
outside of Zone 5 that impacted arterials and intersections
within Zone 5. Other alternatives that may be considered or used
in conjunction with assessment districts are listed below.
1. Require future development within Zone 5 and outside
Zone 5 which contributes traffic to these segments to
fund part or all of the cost of the needed
improvements.
2. Establish traffic impact fees for all projects
contributing traffic to the impacted road sections or
intersections.
-174-
I ....
-..J ,I='
QI
I
---FUTURE RO AD
-EXISTING ROAD
0 INTERSECTIONS
IMPACTED IN ZONE
* INTERSECTIONS IMPACTED OUTSIDE
ZONE
ZONE 5
~ 0~ _.,,. \. cl'-~~------..... ..,,,.--\ ___ .,,. \
HIDDEN ,->\
VALLEY v -\
ROAD
CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
\
\
' ' CAMINO '-
4/IDA ROBLE ',
' ' '\
\
\
\
Cllw, ot Ca,labad
Growlh M1n1gemen1 Program
JANUARY 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
.... .....
.i:,
O" I
lili FULLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
0 PARTIALLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
Needed Improvements
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
L-LANE
BL-BIKE LANE
M-MEDIAN
CG-CURB & GUTTER
S-SIDEWALK
SL-STREET LIGHT
ST-STREET TREE
FULL
ZONE U
:· I -I -I -I -I -I --
1
ZONE-1
ZONE 5
ZONE 8
LOCAL FACILITIES
(R)
4 L, 2C G, 2 S, 2 ST ,2SL,M
ZONE 20
MANAGEMENT
CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
BUILDOUT IMPROVEMENTS
(I)
M,L,CG,S,SL,
~• ST on east aide
·,
(H)
(G) I L,CG,S,SL,ST,
M on ei••t aide -·-·-·• -·-· -••• I
( J)
Full
ZONE 16
• Improvements
(
L,CG,S,SL,
M on eaat
(P)
2L,CG,S,SL,S
M on north al
PROGRAM
I
ZONE 10 (B)
L,CG,S,ST,SL,
M on ••• , llde
aide
M on aouth aide
Clly of Carl1b10
Growrh Managemen1 Program
JANUARY 1987
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
ZONE 5
NEEDED ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS
El Camino Real (southern boundary of Zone 5 to Camino
Vida Roble) lane, bike lane, curb and gutter, street
light, street tree for approximately 1600 feet on the
east side. Approximate cost $196,460. Source -Future
development of adjacent property.
El Camino Real (Camino Vida Roble to Palomar Airport
Road) median, lane, bike lane, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street light, street tree, median on the east
side. Approximate cost $775,275. Source -Future
development of adjacent property. Note -Olympic
Resorts was required to install the median along their
frontage as a condition of approval for SDP 83-6.
El Camino Real (Palomar Airport Road adjacent to
Palomar Airport) median, 2 lanes, 2 curb and gutters, 2
sidewalks, 2 street lights, 2 street trees for
approximately 950 feet. Approximate cost $258,650.
Source -City of Carlsbad and San Diego County. Note
-This section will be constructed by the City and
County as a joint venture with the County paying for
the construction cost and the City paying for the design
and management costs. Improvements should be completed
within 2 years.
El Camino Real (Costa Real Municipal Water District
Office Frontage) median for approximately 200 feet.
Approximate cost -$25,300. Source -City and County.
Note -This section will be constructed by the City
and County as a joint venture with the County paying
for the construction cost and the City paying for the
design and management costs. Improvements should be
completed within 2 years.
El Camino Real (median, lane, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street light, street tree for approximately
1850 feet on the east side. Approximate cost -
$362,900. Source -City and County. Note -This
section will ,be constructed by the City and County as a
joint venture with the County paying for the
cosntruction cost and the City paying for the design
and management costs. Improvements should be completed
within 2 years.
-175-
F •
G)
H)
I)
J)
K)
L)
M)
C
El Camino Real (from 150 feet south of Faraday Avenue
to 350 feet north of Faraday Avenue) median for
approximately 400 feet. Approximate cost -$50,600.
Source -City and County. Note -This section will be
constructed by the City and County as a joint venture
with the County paying for the construction cost and
the City paying for the design and management costs.
Improvements should be completed within 2 years.
El Camino real (from 350 feet north of Faraday Avenue
to 540 feet north of Faraday Avenue) median, lane, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, street light, street tree for
approximately 190 feet. Approximate cost -$39,495.
Source -Future development of the property.
El Camino Real (Fox property frontage) median, lane,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light, street tree
for approximately 2,600 feet on the west side.
Approximate cost -$509,975. Source -Future
development of adjacent property. Note: massive
grading required, which could substantially increase
the price of this improvement.
El Camino Real (Carlsbad Research Center frontage)
median, 2 lanes, 2 curb and gutters, 2 sidewalks, 2
street lights, 2 street trees for approximately 1,100
feet. Approximate cost -$305,225. Source -Future
development on both sides of El Camino Real. Note:
CT85-24 -Carlsbad Research Center is responsible for
improvements on west side and CT83-36 Sycamore Creek
is responsible for improvements on east side of this
segment.
Faraday Avenue (from easterly terminus to easterly
boundary of Zone 5) full improvements for approximately
1500 feet. Approximate cost $885,000. Source -Future
development of County owned property.
Faraday Avenue (from El Camino Real to approximately
360 feet east) sidewalk for approximately 360 feet on
the south side. Approximate cost $5,400. Source -
Future redevelopment of the adjacent property.
Faraday Avenue (from westerly terminus to westerly edge
of Zone 5) full improvements. Source required for
phases III -V of CT85-24 Carlsbad Research Center).
Palomar Airport Road (from easterly boundary of Zone 5
to about 4,600 feet west) median, 2 lanes, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, street trees for
approximately 4,600 feet on the south side.
Approximate cost -$1,116,075. Source -future
development of adjacent property.
-176-
C N)
0)
P)
C
Q)
R)
C ,
Palomar Airport Road (from 4,600 feet from the easterly
boundary of Zone 5 to El Camino Real) median, 4 lanes, 2
curb and gutters, 2 sidewalks, 2 street trees, and 2
street lights for approximately 1,900 feet. Approximate
cost -$703,475. Source -City on the north side and
future development on the south side. Note: The City
will install full width improvements on the north side
and do some remedial work on the south side. These
improvements will bring this section of Palomar Airport
Road up to four lanes and should be completed within two
years.
Palomar Airport Road (from El Camino Real to
approximately 1,250 feet to the west) median, lane,
curb and gutter, street light, street tree on north
side for approximately 1,250 feet. Approximate cost -
$244,531. Source: City and County. Note: This
section will be constructed by the City and County as a
joint venture with the County paying for the
construction cost and the City paying for the design
and management costs. Improvements should be completed
within 2 years.
Palomar Airport Road (from approximately 1,250 feet
west of El Camino Real to approximately 350 feet west
of Yarrow Drive) median, 2 lanes, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street light, street tree on the north side
for approximately 2,200 feet. Approximate cost
$533,775. Source -City and County. Note: This
section will be constructed by the City and County as a
joint venture with the County paying for the
construction cost and the City paying for the design
and management costs. Improvements should be completed
within 2 years.
Palomar Airport Road (from approximately 350 feet west
of Yarrow Drive to existing full width improvments)
median, 2 lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street
light, street trees for approximately 1,900 feet.
Approximate cost -$461,012. Source -Phase II
development of Carlsbad Airport Center, CT81-46.
Palomar Airport Road (from westerly edge of fully
improved section to westerly boundary of Zone 5)
median, 4 lanes, 2 sidewalks, 2 curb and gutters, 2
street lights, 2 street trees for approximately 9,200
feet. Approximate cost -$7,300,000. Source -Public
facilities fees and an assessment district.
-177-
s.
T.
College Avenue (from Palomer Airport Road to the
southerly boundary of Zone 5) full width improvements
for approximately 1100 feet. Approximate Cost -
$759,000. Source -Development of adjacent property.
Note: CT 84-32/PUD-73 Cobblestone Sea Village was
conditioned to construct a portion of this segment of
College Avenue to provide access to their site.
Hidden Valley Road (from westerly boundary of one 5 to
Palomar airport Road) full width improvements for
approximately 2300 feet. Approximate Cost -
$1,357,000. Source -Development of adjacent property.
Note: Ct-85-17 College Business Park, is conditioned
to construct half width plus 12 feet within a fully
graded right of way for this section during Phase II of
their development.
-178-
Note -Page 179 was not used.
(_
APPENDIX 6
-180-
C EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED TRAFFIC PROJECTION
FOR IMPACTED ROAD SEGMENTS WITHIN
ZONE 5
The following worksheets represent level of service
projections for impacted road segments within Zone 5. The
existing AM and PM peak traffic counts from the Barton-Aschman
traffic study were projected across a linear time table with
threshold level of service (E) noted. Information derived from
this chart enabled staff to determine when the road segments on
Palomar Airport Road would fall below an acceptable Level of
Service "D".
The methodology was.based on information available in the
Highway Capacity Manual developed by the Transportation Research
Board, Washington, D.C. 1985.
-181-
\I
.
.
~
"'
~-
i
Q
C'
"'
I
c"
~
..
.
~
{
"
..
,
~
i
).
i
0
!
~
~
i
~
l
":,
.
~
..a
'I
!
~
i
~
t
'lo
.
,S
l
9
~
\o
~l
8
~
~
~
~
i
~
:
..
.
,
..
.
.
!
~
~
~
a)
~
:l
"'
~
Q
'I
t
~
~
i
"'
')
,
,
""
t
~
"
~
~
l
~
!
>-
~
t
v
t
l
"
"
f
2
~
I(
t
t
\.,
:
...
-
~
'
.t
l
s
~
~
~
~t
Q
I
-i
:
:
~
'U
i
t
.Q
~
"'
i
t
!;
I
o
(
~
~
'W
~
"
~
..
.
.
':
:
,
,
~
~
t
<:a
~
l.
~
€
.,.
,e
:)
~
0
~
,I
q:
,I
\
t
t
..
.
.
:i
t
t
~
~
\U
:9
0
I-
-
-
"'
~~
~
IJ
~
<
~
X
~
mm
m
'"
"
<<
<
:;
=
=
i
'I
t
~S
?
~
~
~
~~
~
'f
l
:
:
!
~~
~
~
\u
..
.
~~
~
q,:
'I
f
-N
O
-
<
,
~~
~
i
NN
N
'.
.J
...
.
.
.
.
.
1:
9
\I
S
~i
.
c{
~
Q
,,
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,.
.
.
.
.
.
u,
-4
:
-I
:
~
q,
'-
~
~
:)
,.
;
:
f
c:)
0
-
()
C)
~
Gil
l
0
.-
!
J
<
~
'-
.
:
I
\V
Q
i
i
~
C.
~
a.
<
~-
"
~
J ~
""
~~
e
0
...
.
;
"'
[
._
,
;;;
;
~
IT
"
~
a)
r
"
~
zt
r
'il
l
t
Il
l
--
l
\l
J
•
),
.
~
4
..
.
.
V\
\U
'I
t
'::
!
~
-:
:
,
,.
~
..,
>-
i
°"
'
"'
\
..
.
~
"
~
-
-
-
..
.
.,
:r
•
...
•
QI
.
..
.
.
til
l
(_
,
,
:
:?
:
0
Q
8
C)
i
&
~
8
Q
n
11'
1
~
("
\
M
N
C'<
I
(
~V
l
'
I
Of
'
I
I
J
.
)
3.
L
f
f
~
"j
(
~
-
:
J
l
i
/
~
1
-
,-
(
'
O
f
f
>i
'
l
:
l
d
-1
8
2
-
-
~
C
~
t
"'
..
.
)
0
t
,..
,
.
ii
:
:
.
t
..
J
~
0
...
u.
:
"'
('I
E
t
~
~
'
t
N
--.
1
~
II
\
\.
.
.,
i
t
~
~
0
i
~
~
~
~
-
..
.
.
.,
~
~
IJ
{2
~
I
I-
.
.
\I
J
!
;:
;
i
~
:.
,.
..
.
~
>..
<t
~
~
•
~
C
\J
~
~
~
t
..
.
l
t
'I
/
!
...
~
~
,l
~
~
~
"'
~
""
..
.
.
.
~
~
£
\)
j
~
~
-
~
t
~
t
~
\la
0
1
1
"'
"'
"'
~
~
~
~
~
s
,I
t
mm
m
..
J
!
"
<<
<
'l
£
~
~
~
~
!
~
o:
{
1
~=
=
>
~
S?
S
?
S
?
\U
2
u.
.
i
~
.:
i
~
..
.
'-
~
"'"
'
"
'
&
~
t
")
I"
r-
.
.
~
~~
~
"'
..
.
:
~
"'
00
0
£
t
"<
.n
~
;
.
:
s
-~
<
>
~
mm
m
,-
,
M
M
s:
-
NN
t
"
<
!
~
~~
~
-:
.
~
i
It
[
~
C:)
i=
;
~ ..
.
-c
\J
:>
"'
\u
,.
..
,
0
~
~
C
0
C.
~
"
~
""
'
('
f
\
~
-:.
~
l
~
,..
.
~
..J
..
il
l
0
'=
>
'l
:
_,
u..
"'
C
\{
_
0
~
,a
-
..
~
,r
~
~
..
.
.
~
~
lu
"'
~v
'
""
'
t
..
.
.
II
\
6-
.
a
,
.
+
..
.
~
~
c,,
,
l
+6
-
--
l
~
""
~
,.
"'
'i
-
0
"
_}
..
.
,
'/
/
(
.-
r
SC
~
>-
-.:r
-
-
--
-
Q
.,.
.
~
Cl
-G:>
..
.
.
C
0
C)
0
Q
0
0
Qa
Q
Q
0
8
"'
8
~
..
.
.
'-
)
~
~
IW
\
I"
\
N
r,
r.
i
(.
<
~
,
.
,
ot
N
.
)
;.
H
/
"
1
.,
t;
i
:
l
it
..
J.
.
')
l
l
'
(
)
f
-
4
)J
.
1
t
1
:
:
/
d
-1
8
3
-
TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS 8-3 I
WORKSHEET FOR GENERAL TERRAIN SEGMENTS
PA1.om41Z 1t,t1.. Porrr P-o 1/-o bL I /8 7 Site Identification: E c ({ n:, EMT C.1t7'. J../tt110 Date: Time: 7 · .Jo 1'111 ;
Name: f) f1,-J1~ 1-MvSE.fl... Checked by:
I. GEOMETRIC DATA 0 ,-~ i-8 ft
Design Speed: ss-mph
% No Passing: 60 %
NORTH ~ft Terrain (L,R,M): t... r:;~'t:.L
Shoulder _~_ft Segment Length: -z . --z.. mi
II. TRAFFIC DATA E1'i~r fr><isr -1-ui,..
ft.A,'(-A,. lttt> 3000
Total Volume, Both Dir.~,.. }Se>O 3"oo vph Directional Distribution: Co/to
Flow Rate = Volume + PHF Traffic Composition: JO %T, '-%RV,_l_%B
= ·-PHF: 'S;;-~ Sr;€ let.ow \. ~ '1l, :5 c'c tJt'to,.,
ill. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
SF,= 2,800 X (v /c)i X fd X f.,, X fHv fHv = 1 / [1 + Pr(Er-1) +
PR(ER-1) + P8(E8-l)]
-
C LOS SF = 2,800 X (v/c) X fd X f.,, X fHV Pr Er PR ER Pa Es
Table 8-1 Table 8-4 Table 8-5 Table 8-6 Table 8-6 Table 8-6
A Jb-z.. 2,800 .01 ,'ti-I ,BB 'I -z... 0 ,o 2. Z.. L ,0 I /. B
B 410 2,800 I 19 I 14 I ,~(. I 1 2.., 't. .o?.. 'Z, $ I 0\ -z..o
C 770 2,800 ,Jt I "'.,. I , 'ob I I 2.. l.. .cl. Z,5 ,01 2..0
D 1'30t. 2,800 I)'\ ,q+ ( ,S'l . I '2. 0 ,oz. I, l, '01 I. b
E 2 J42. 2,800 I .o .er+ I ,Sc:, ,1 7-, i) I ot I ,i::, .0\ /,6
IY. COMMENTS Flow Rate vph LOS=-
6 "X1.>1uv(,
AtYI ~An:· : l+oo -:-.'i+ -= I+ S'1 1.-0 .s = D
rw1 .( ,r, .:: )$'0-b "i ,C,1 ~ 1518 l.-0> :: {)
c-Xl5'T1#' Pt-vs co~ ,,,,rr ea
C A~ -+ '~, 31-z.; L. 0 ~ =-E. oil., r,,vc1t:,I
~+-rf = 3000 .,,,.
3 ,oo ..;. . ,, 3 '150 1,..0; ::-C. o-<. ivMSt
p~ ft.Ht' = -=
-184-
TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS 8-31
C WORKSHEET FOR GENERAL TERRAIN SEGMENTS
PALOIPll\-12. A ,r<i'o4.T r'2..o it sJ
Site Identification: poAI ro P4:..o,,,,q,-z Q,,,_KS W~) Date: ~ l I )8 7 Time: z:30 /'NJ I
Name: 01tu10 1-1,1 J5e1L. Checked by:
I. GEOMETRIC DATA 0 s~= i-B ft
Design Speed: !i'S mph
% No Passing: C/0 %
NORTH . ~ft Terrain (L,R,M): r_eve~
Shoulder _S_ft Segment Length: 1,8 mi
II. TRAFFIC DATA IS,-')C1tj1/fl/C,
f.t:A" 17ooLJsoo vph Directional Distribution: 60/+o Total Volume, Both Dir.
Flow Rate = Volume + PHF fll'I A,,., Traffic Composition: JO %1; '2. o/oR'J,_I %8
;,~ /781 = 1700 + .,$ PHF: o,-,s
""' 1518 1500 ''if
ill. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
SF,= 2,800 X (v /c)i X fd X fw X fHv fHv = 1 / [1 + Pr(Er-1) +
PR(ER-1) + Pe(Ee-1)] -
LOS SF = 2,800 X (v/c) X fd X fw X fHV Pr Er PR ER Pe Ee
Table 8-1 Table 8-4 Table 8-5 Table 8-6 Table 8-6 Table 8-6
A 11& 2,800 ,05' , '14-I .~B , I 2.0 IC 2. 2. '2 ,01 ,. &
B J84 2,800 '17 . 9+ I -~b , I '2., z. ,OL z.. S" ·01 2... 0
C 74-b 2,800 ,33 ,q4-I ,8b . I 2 . 'Z. ,02.. 2., J" ,0/ 2.0
D I 358 2,800 ,58 ' c;4-I , 61 . I Z,o .oa I, C. · o I I ,b
E -z Jtz. 2.800 /.o , '1+ I .Si . I '2.,0 ,02. /. b , <, I I •b
5-XI 5TI/I/'-
IY. COMMENTS Flow Rate I 51B vph AM LOS= 0 5 f=XJ 51JN(. I 7Bci
II f" f,,, Pn1 LOS = D
~x,~-n~, fL-U5 c.o,,.,,, ,rreo
AfYI f1.,ou1 ti.1t-rl -: 2800 -:' ·"' = '2.'lt7 Lo5 = ~ 0"~ ,;011.~f
p"' p /.,o,,J a.itTt: : Jsoo ..;. '~, ~ 36+'-t..oS = E. c:, C. i,oJC4,H' ,.
C
-185-
C
Descriptions of Conditions for Various Roadway Levels of Service
Level of Service
A
B
C
D
E
F
Operating Conditions
Free flow; speed controlled by
driver's desires, speed limits, or
physical roadway conditions.
Stable flows; operating speeds
beginning to be restricted; little
or no restrictions on
maneuverability from other
vehicles.
Stable flow; speeds and
maneuverability more closely
restricted.
Approaches unstable flow; tolerable
speeds can be maintained, but
temporary restrictions to flow
cause substantial drops in speed.
Little freedom to maneuver, comfort
and convenience low.
Volumes near capacity; flow
unstable; stoppages of momentary
duration. Ability to maneuver
severely limited.
Forced flow; low operating speeds;
volumes below capacity, queues
form.
-186-
APPENDIX 7
-187-
C
C
AMENDED COST ESTIMATES FOR
IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS
The following
specific intersections
additional costs are
provisions for right
includes provisions for
represents amended cost estimates for
which staff has determined specific and/or
associated. Two intersections include
of way acquisition. One intersection
sewer pump station relocation.
The
identified
adequate.
costs
in the
for mitigating the remianing intersections
Barton-Aschman traffic study were considered
-188-
I ....
00
U)
I
0 l
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(E. SIDE) W-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(E. SIDE) E-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(W. SIDE) W-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(W. SIDE) E-BOUND
PASEO DEL NORTE
(N-SIDE) N-BOUND
PASEO DEL NORTE
(N-SIDE) S-BOUND
PASEO DEL NORTE
(S-SIDE) N-BOUND
PASEO DEL NORTE
(S-SIDE) S-BOUND
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE
1 ADDITIONAL LANE (free right)
RESTRIPE (w'ly thru lane)
EXTEND MEDIAN EASTERLY
RE-STRIPE & sign
EXTEND IMPROVMENTS & MERGE E'LY
RE-STRIPE & SIGN
COMPLETER-LANE IMPROVEMENTS
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
OK
MEDIAN
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
R/W ACQUISITION (7-11)
OK
TOTAL COST
ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY
$500.00
$2,000.00
$5000.00
$25,000.00
$12,000.00
$ 44,000.00
$ 6,000.00
$ 50,000.00
I ....
1,0
0 I
EL CAMINO REAL
(N-SIDE) S-BOUNO
EL CAMINO REAL
(S-SIDE) N-BOUl~D
TAMARACK AVENUE
( E. SIDE) E-BOUND
TAMARACK AVENUE
(E. SIDE) W-BOUNU
TAMARACK AVENUE
(W. SIDE) E-BOUND
TAMARACK AVENUE
(W. SIDE) W-BOUND
n
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED
EL CAMINO REAL AND TAMARACK AVENUE
RE-STRIPE (opp. r-turn)
3 ADDITIONAL LANES
(1R, 15, 1L)
R/W ACQUISITION (Robertson)
RE-LOCATE UTILITIES & PUMP STATION
(OK)
(OK, 1 EXTRA LANE -FREE RIGHT)
RE-STRIPE (opp. r-turn)
(OK)
TOTAL COST=
-0-
$75,000.00
$25,000.00
$100,000.00
$70,000.00
$270,000.00
n
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED
EL CAMINO REAL AND FARADAY AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL EXTEND IMPROVEMENTS N'LY $50,000.00
(N-SIDE) N-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL (OK, 1 EXTRA LANE)
(N-SIDE) S-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL (OK 1 EXTRA LANE)
(S-SIDE) N-BOUND
I EL CAMINO REAL (OK) _.
ID (S-SIDE) 5-BOUND _.
I
FARADAY (W.SIDE) (OK)
( W-BOUIW)
FARADAY (W. SIDE) ( OK, 2 EXTRA LANES)
(E-BOUND)
FARADAY (E. SIDE) (OK, 1 EXTRA LANE)
(W-BOUND)
FARADAY (E. SIDE) (OK)
(E-BOUND)
TOTAL COST = $50,000.00
I ....
ID N
I
n
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(W. SIDE) W-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(W. SIDE) E-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(E. SIDE) W-BOUND
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
(E. SIDE) E-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL
(N-SIDE) N-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL
(N-SIDE) S-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL
(S-SIDE) N-BOUND
EL CAMINO REAL
(S-SIDE) S-BOUND
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
COMPLETE REQ'D IMPROVEMENTS,
MEDIAN (Olympic Resorts)
2 ADDITIONAL LANES
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
EXTEND IMPROVEMENTS N'LY
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
EXTEND IMPROVEMENTS N'LY
2 ADDITIONAL LANES
EXTEND IMPROVEMENTS N'LY
1 ADDITIONAL LANE
RE-STRIPE
COMPLETE REQ'D IMPROVEMENTS,
MEDIAN (Olympic Resorts)
TOTAL COST=
$42,000.00
00
$50,000.00
$42,000.00
$25,000.00
$42,000.00
$25,000.00
$50,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$1,500.00
00
$327,500.00
(
C
4CXJ'
------------------.. ---------" . I I "·------~--------~
~ t l~,C:CO~
1'.:>:) T'fP& ''cl' ~OllJS~C.umtz.. @ I\.•.!/ i:=-r. ~ .. 3,?Jff .0 :. Zl,7oe-
c.7\ G,CZA.01~ ~ -o,rc ?Ref'. (1.-1.111\,\p ~IM>
P:'\ STlZ.\P\~ £. ~~~~ ( II " )
e~ ~l<dN~ ~ C,O~ ~O\Ftc:A=r1otJ ~-Z5,C::CCS.2_
~ 1'"1E IN'lc~C::nCN )
1-•----
~ A.e. t)~"E ~ ~M
s~ .,..,,i .. ~•· o,~,,~~--..
c~ <21Uio,w<.o <t-fAtl: ft.EP.
o~ ~T~1P11ll=, ~ t(<dNI~ .. ti
-193-
.. _
: 31/1:0
~l'-1a-1Cis ~c.ojl,J n~1..~
~ 4i.,oco ·:..
APPENDIX 8
C ..
-194-
C
April 27 , 1987
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Fire Chief
SAFETY CENTER FIRE STATION -AIRPORT IMPACT AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT
STANDARDS RECOMMENDATION
Abstract: This report will discuss the central or Safety Center fire station in
three different contexts. First, the F. A. A. standards for airport fire protection
will be review~d against what the Safety Center site would offer Palomar Airport.
Second, the needs for a central fire station will be discussed. Third, we will
present a draft growth management plan fire protection standards for the
industrial/commercial center city (Planning Zone 5).
Fire Protection and Palomar Airport
Staff has consulted with Mr. Bob Bloom, Chief of Airport Inspection Services,
with the Federal Aviation Administration in Los Angeles. The current and future
of Palomar Airport was reviewed. Currently, Palomar has a part time operating
certificate under which no airport or municipal fire protection is required.
If Palomar obtained a full operating certificate, their firefighting capabilities would
have to comply with F .A.A. Regulations, Volume 10, part 139 (see attachment A).
A full operating certificate would allow an air carrier five or more regularly
scheduled flights per day with 30 or more passengers.
The fire protection standards are split into indexes based on aircraft size. Due
to Palomar's short, single runway (4,000 feet), their operations are limited to
Index A and a few Index B aircraft. In all probability, the current carrier would
only use Index A aircraft.
In summary, the firefighting standards for Index A is one "lightweight" vehicle
(pickup truck) with 500 lbs. of dry chemical extinguishing agents with a response
time to runway center from time of alarm at three minutes or less. This vehicle
may be privately owned and operated by minimally trained airport employees. If
Index B aircraft are serviced, then a second lightweight vehicle is required with
a capacity to generate 1,500 gallons of foam at a runway center within four
minutes of alarm. Again, private ownership and trained airport employees are
acceptable.
The Safety Center fire station site is 1. 9 miles from runway center with a response
time (driving) of at least 3. 5 minutes. Mr. Bloom stated with that distance no
fire protection credit would ever be extended to the airport for operation of any
Index aircraft. He further stated most small airports with a full operating
certificate buy a pickup truck and have local mechanics man it. If more fire
protection than that is required, it has to be sited on the runway itself to satisfy
response time requirements.
-195-
C
C
Mr. Bloom went on to state that for Palomar to get a full operating certificate,
fire protection is their least worry. Rather, the EIR, noise and zoning hurdles
are immense. Mr. Bloom ltnows the principals behind the Palomar operation and
is sure these major obstacles are what is delaying their application for a full
operating certificate.
In conclusion, for Palomar Airport to expand its operation, City of Carlsbad
assistance with fire protection is not required. Additionally, the Safety Center
site is too far from the runway center to ever be of measurable service within
F.A.A. standards. The F.A.A. is also expected to release even stricter fire
protection standards in six months, further making the Safety Center site
unusable to the Airport to meet F. A. A. standards. Of course, if an aircraft
were to crash short of or around the runway in the industrial center, then the
Safety Center fire station would be ideally located. ~~~ ~a,. ... ,~.,~
~---K. THOMPSON
Fire Chief
fg
c: Frank Mannen
Marty Orenyak
Michael Holzmiller
-196-
C
C,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -PROJECT NEED ANALYSIS
CENTRAL FIRE STATION -PHASE III SAFETY CENTER
RECOMMENDATION
To schedule the start of construction of Fire Station No. 5 in
January 1988. This means placing the project in the 87/88
C.I.P. budget. The approximately 12,000 square foot station is
currently under design with an approximate budget of 1.68
million dollars. A construction time of eight months is
estimated. By starting on January 1988 the project funding
will be split over two fiscal years. Manpower and equipment
will be brought on line in early Fiscal 88/89 for a projected
October 1, 1988 opening date.
BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION
There are several factors guiding placement and timing of new
fire stations. Historically, Carlsbad Fire Department has
planned a central fire station to meet the needs of the
expanding center city. That station was originally part of a new
headquarters project, and if not for the Safety Center, would
have been built today. However, the station and administrative
functions were split with the Safety Center concept, and with
financial timing, the fire station was pushed back to be
scheduled as Phase III.
The central fire station will first of all provide improved
response times and service delivery capabilities to the largely
industrial city center. With its strategic lcoation, it will
also house specialized equipment such as our heavy rescue
truck or brush fire truck. Thus, either the fire truck or
special vehicles have a greatly improved response time in
backing up the stations in the four corners of the City.
Commonly accepted response time standards for industrial fire
protection such as Insurance Service Offie guidelines call for
the first fire truck to be on scene in less than 5 minutes, and
the rest of the required fire trucks to be on scene in less
than 10 minutes. The following chart outlines our approximate
response time capabilities in minutes.
LOCATION FIRE STATION: 1 2 3 4
Palomar Airport Rd. & El Camino Real 12 5 9 11
Palomar Airport 13 7 10 10
Faraday and Orion 11 6 9 12
197
C
(_
(_
The other commonly accepted standard of performance is to
be able to provide 1,000 gallons of water per minute fire
flow at a sprinklered industrial building within 10
minutes. Combined with repsonse time, Carlsbad's
measure of performance should be the first fire truck on
scene in less than 5 minutes, and the balance of the trucks
needed for a 11,000 gallon per minute fire flow in 10
minutes.
Carlsbad operates three person fire companies. We know
through testing that it takes one man on the fireground
to deliver 100 gallons per minute through a variety of
means. Therefore, to deliver a 1,000 gpm fire flow in 10
minutes we need three engine companies on scene.
As is apparent from the response time chart, we cannot deliver
one truck in less than 5 minutes, or three trucks in less than
10 minutes in Growth Management Planning Zone 5. Also, those
times assume all units are in quarters and available, it does
not measure our significant emergency medical workload demand.
Another planning factor is what we are responding to and its
probability of risk for generating fire, ambulance or hazardous
materials emergencies. The following chart is data from the
Planning Department's Growth Management Zone 5 Plan. It
outlines the exlsiting and projected industrial square
footage demand, and projected population which ls based upon a
workforce population survey conducted by Planning Staff.
Currently for example, Orange County Fire Department, for
industrial parks, in addition to the standards already reviewed,
sites fire stations for these areas when the work force
population exceeds 25,000.
INDUSTRIAL ZONE ANALYSIS
CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE
1. Built 4,256,609
2. Approved, committed to devel-9,545,303
opment, maps and site plans
approved. Construction two
years or less
SUBTOTAL: 13,801,912
3. Future to build out. 8,394,387
Parcel maps approved, zoning
density factors used to predict
square footage yield.
BUILD OUT TOTAL: 22,196,299
-198-
LABOR FORCE
POPULATION
7,820
17,547
25,371
15,431
40,802
What is significant is the dollar valuation of these buildings
to our tax base, and sales tax revenues. A major fire, medical
or hazardous materials incident could have a significant fiscal
or life loss impact. On site mitigation and inspection measures
are critical, but once an incident occurs so is prompt initial
response to start control and containment of the emergency.
The following chart shows our responses to Planning Zone 5 for
two years:
Emergency Medical
Fire/Other
CONCLUSION
1985
70
79
149 annual
1986
64
100
164 annual
Due to the factors reviewed and the construction lag time
involved, we feel it prudent to have a central fire station open
by Fall 1988. This station will not only ensure adequate
coverage to Planning Zone 5, but provide improved second due
unit or specialized unit coverage to residents in the entire
City.
-199-
C.
C ..
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
INDUSTRIAL COMPOSITE FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD
1. First due engine on scene< 5 minutes, and work force is>
12,000 people*. -
2. Provide 1,000 GPM fire flow< 10 minutes.
A. 1,000 GPM -100 GPM/man = 10 men
10 men= 3 engines, 1 ambulance
10 minutes
10 minutes
* 12,000 people is the residential standard times four since
the 40 hour work week is 1/4 of the total hours of
protection in one week.
Station 5 provides:
The department the ability to meet both Industrial Standards 1
and 2.
STATION 5 LOCATION ANALYSIS
LOCATION MILES TIME (mins. at 30MPH mean)
Faraday & E.C.R. .35 --:-rs
P.A.R. & E.C.R. 1.00 2.00
Airport 1. 70 3.40
P.A.R. & Camino Vida Robles 2.10 4.20
P.A.R. & Palomar Oaks 2.60 5.20
Yarrow & Camino Vida Robles 2.10 4.20
E.C.R. & Camino Vida Robles 1. 70 3.40
P.A.R. & El Fuette 1. 80 3.60
-200-
c:
APPENDIX 9
-201-
(MISSING)
(
C
APPENDIX 10
C
C
-204-
(-·
-
C
l
SURVEY OF WORK FORCE POPULATION IN ZONE 5
This survey establishes the number of employees in the
industrial area of the City. This information will help
facilitate the completion of the Public Facilities Management
Plan for that area. The survey was conducted from 5/12/87 to
5/19/87 between the hours of 9:00-12 p.m. and 1:00 to 3:00 p.m.
The total work force was found to be approximately 7,820. This
number is an approximation due to some businesses unwillingness
to provide the information requested.
-205-
c~ Street Address Work Force Poeulation
1969 Palomar Oaks Way 0
1979 Palomar Oaks Way 23
1985 Palomar Oaks Way 25
1989 Palomar Oaks Way 6
6349 Palomar Oaks Court 50
6350 Palomar Oaks Court 40
2075 Las Palmas Drive 87
2077 Las Palmas Drive 0
2081 Las Palmas Drive 10
2101 Las Palmas Drive 17
2131 Las Palmas Drive 23
2151 Las Palmas Drive 17
2221 Las Palmas Drive 110
2160 Las Palmas Drive 0
2120 Las Palmas Drive 22
2180 Las Palmas Drive 90
2281 Las Palmas Drive 25
2281 Las Palmas Drive 110
2175 Camino Vida Roble Left Letter
2225 Camino Vida Roble ]
2245 Camino Vida Roble ] 300
2265 Camino Vida Roble ]
2385 Camino Vida Roble 40
C 2380 Camino Vida Roble 11
2382 Camino Vida Roble 41
2384 Camino Vida Roble 0
2350 Camino Vida Roble 20
2310 Camino Vida Roble 200
2320 Camino Vida Roble 40
2270 Camino Vida Roble 177
2325 Camino Vida Roble 6
2335 Camino Vida Roble 50
2345 Camino Vida Roble 100
2355 Camino Vida Roble 0
2365 Camino Vida Roble 0
2375 Camino Vida Roble 0
6451 El Camino Real 0
6305 El Camino Real 150
6225 El Camino Real 150
6155 El Camino Real 1500 (all Hughes)
5815 El Camino Real 260
5720 El Camino Real 90
5960 El Camino Real 81
5950 El Camino Real 26
5580 El Camino Real 12
6350 Yarrow Drive 59
6361 Yarrow Drive 38
6351 Yarrow Drive 55
(._ 6241 Yarrow Drive 73
6231 Yarrow Drive 25
-206-
,.,. Street Address Work Force Poeulation
'---6221 Yarrow Drive ] 194
6200 Yarrow Drive ]
6211 Yarrow Drive 40
6110 Yarrow Drive 15
6150 Yarrow Drive 24
6190 Yarrow Drive 35
6354 Corte Del Abeto 25
6352 Corte Del Abeto 130
6212 Corte Del Abeto 65
2055 Corte Del Noga! 140
2045 Corte Del Noga! 17
2042 Corte Del Noga! 80
2052 Corte Del Noga! 25
2075 Corte Del Noga! 51
2051 Palomar Airport Road --(part of Hughes)
2121 Palomar Airport Road 40
2219 Palomar Airport Road 15
1991 Palomar Airport Road 4
2141 Palomar Airport Road 36
2131 Palomar Airport Road --(Hughes)
2111 Palomar Airport Road 100
2011 Palomar Airport Road 12
2261 Cosmos Court --(Hughes)
2270 Cosmos Court 90
C 2271 Cosmos Court 0
6054 Corte Del Cedro 50
6056 Corte Del Cedro 15
6058 Corte Del Cedro 19
6060 Corte Del Cedro 5
6062 Corte Del Cedro 0
6064 Corte Del Cedro 0
6066 Corte Del Cedro 13
6068 Corte Del Cedro ] 32
6072 Corte Del Cedro ]
6070 Corte Del Cedro 5
6074 Corte Del Cedro 3
6076 Corte Del Cedro 0
6078 Corte Del Cedro 9
6082 Corte Del Cedro 18
6084 Corte Del Cedro 0
6086 Corte Del Cedro 22
6088 Corte Del Cedro 12
2386 Faraday Avenue 81
2390 Faraday Avenue 3
2351 Faraday Avenue 0
Beckman Instruments Faraday Avenue ] 270
Beckman Faraday Avenue ]
2330 Faraday Avenue 0
2320 Faraday Avenue 0
2310 Faraday Avenue 0 c·
-207-
C Street Address Work Force Population
2292 Faraday Avenue 0
2282 Faraday Avenue 0
2280 Faraday Avenue 25
2240 Faraday Avenue 0
2237 Faraday Avenue 42
2235 Faraday Avenue 18
2233 Faraday Avenue 45
2231 Faraday Avenue 15
2225 Faraday Avenue 5
2215 Faraday Avenue 0
2227 Faraday Avenue 1
2205 Faraday Avenue 7
2185 Faraday Avenue 8
2195 Faraday Avenue 7
2131 Faraday Avenue 0
5751 Palmer Way 30
5741 Palmer Way 40
5731 Palmer Way 162
2431-3433 Impala Drive 45
2440 Impala Drive 210
2460 Impala Drive 0
2443-2445 Impala Drive 0
2453-2455 Impala Drive 60
C 2463-2465 Impala Drive 19
2461 Impala Drive 12
2451 Impala Drive 0
2441 Impala Drive 17
2560 Orion Way 84
2250 Rutherford Road 25
2258 Rutherford Road 150
2221 Rutherford Road 40
2231 Rutherford Road 119
2251 Rutherford Road 0
2261 Rutherford Road 30
5927 Landau Court 24
5957 Landau Court 0
5928 Pascal Drive 0
5931 Priestly Drive 47
5964 La Place Court 0
5966 La Place Court 0
5962 La Place Court 20
1991 Palomar Airport Road 4
6115 El Camino Real 155
Palomar Airport 500
TOTAL WORK FORCE POPULATION = 7,820
C
-208-
APPEN.DIX 11
-209-
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2668
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 5 ON PROPERTY
DESIGNATED FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE
VICINITY OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILIITES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 5
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797
adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
establishing facility zones and performance standards for public
facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 9808
C 13 requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan,
14 and
C
15 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of
16 June, 1987, and on the 1st day of July, 1987, hold a duly noticed
17 public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
18 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
19 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
20 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
21 relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5.
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
23 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
24 A)
25 B)
26
27 I I II
28 I I I I
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 5, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
-210-
C
C
C
].
2
3
4
5
6
Findings:
1)
2)
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 is
consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities
Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's
General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 is
consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities
and Improvements Plan.
7 3) That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare
by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in
conformance with the adopted performance standards. 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4)
5)
6)
The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing
and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to
the provision of public facilities and improvements.
The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and
servi~es are available in conformance with the adopted
performance standards.
This Plan will not cause any significant environmental impacts
and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning
Director on Ju·ne 5, 198 7 and approved by the Planning
Commission on July 1, 1987.
Conditions:
1)
I II I
Ill/
/Ill
/ // /
II//
Ill/
I I I I
II I I
Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 5 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities
Management Plan Zone 5, dated June 17, 1987, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by reference.
PC RESO NO. 2668 -2-
-211-
C
C
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 1st day of July, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Schlehuber,
Schramm, Hall, Holmes, McFadden and McBane.
ATTEST:
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
.
~'
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2668
-212-
MARY CUS, Chairman
CARLS D PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
I
C
C
C
l
2
3
4
RESOLUTION NO. 9188
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5.
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been
· 5 prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in accordance
6 with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on July 1, 1987
81 hold a duly noticed public hearing as required by law to
g consider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted .
10 Resolution No. 2668 making findings and recommending that the
11 City Council adopt a plan; and
12 WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the
13 Planning Director on June 5, 1987 indicating that the Local
i
11 14: Facilities Management Plan is not anticipated to have any
15 significant adverse impact on the environment; and
16 WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of August 4,
17 1987 held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all
18 1 testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard;
I
19 1! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
2oilcouncil of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
211
22
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That the findings of the Planning Commission in
23 Resolution No. 2668 also constitute findings of the City
24 Council.
25 3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5
26 dated June 17, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
27 herein by reference and the amendments attached as Exhibit 11 111
28 -213-
C
C
C
l
2
3
4
.5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
are hereby
boundaries
conditions
approved.
of Zone 5
of said plan.
Any development occurring within the
shall comply with all the terms and
4. That a non-residential park/recreation fee is needed
to help meet the recreational needs of a daytime work force in
excess of 40,000: to help provide safe recreational areas for
this work force: to help reduce peak hour traffic trips, to
encourage a healthful working environment: and, to implement the
policies of the Parks and Recreation Element of the General
Plan.
5. That a non-residential standard is necessary for
fire services to help provide adequate response times and
adequate fire department facilities to ensure the safety of
1 persons and structures located in non-residential areas such as 141 Zone 5.
15
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
16
Carlsbad City Council held on the 4 th day of August , 1987
17
tbY the following vote, to wit:
18 1'. AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
19 i ;>
201
211
221 I 231 A'r'!EST:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
24111 ~ ✓ {2a,,:t;-;J,,..,,.,. :l=
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clk
25
26
27
28
(SEAL)
-214-
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
C
C
C
EXHIBIT 11111
PAGE 8 UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PARKS SHOULD READ:
All future development in Zone 5 shall be required to pay
a local facilities management fee for park/recreational
facilities. Until the specific fee is adopted, all future
developers shall be required to sign an agreement to pay
the fee prior to obtaining building permits.
PAGE 11 UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR FIRE SHOULD READ:
Based upon the adoption of a non-residential fire
standard, the construction of Fire Station No. 5 (Safety
center Location) shall be required to be constructed and
will begin in 1988 with an opening date projected for
early 1989.
-215-