The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2023-04-05; Planning Commission; ; CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER Item No. Application complete date: Aug. 17, 2022 P.C. AGENDA OF:April 5, 2023 Project Planner: Izzak Mireles Project Engineer: Nichole Fine SUBJECT: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER – Request for the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the redevelopment of the existing fleet maintenance facility and storage yard (Orion Center) located at 2600 Orion Way. The Project includes the development of a 41,900 square foot (SF), two-story office building, three warehouse and shop buildings totaling 25,400 SF, and a 92,300 SF, four- story parking structure. The Project site is not located within the Coastal Zone and is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission and is within Local Facilities Management Zone 5. Mitigation Measures included to reduce environmental effects to less than significant are included for Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 1) APPROVING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 2) APPROVING a Conditional Use Permit CUP 2018-0022, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND Project Site/Setting The Orion Center Project (Project) is located in the City of Carlsbad’s Public Safety and Public Works complex area at 2600 Orion Way (APN: 209-050-26-00). The parcel is 26.28 acres and this Project will impact 8.44 acres of the property. The Project site is zoned Open Space (OS), and the General Plan land use designation is Public (P). Although the zoning designation is OS, it is not dedicated by an easement or through the Habitat Management Plan, and the Project extent is entirely within previously disturbed areas and will not impact adjacent habitat preserve to the north and east. The Project site currently has a fleet maintenance building at the northwest corner, an open-air automobile washing and refueling station near the center of the Project site, and a central equipment plant. The site is currently used for fleet maintenance, parking, and outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, and materials for the City of Carlsbad. The existing site contains features that were added incrementally over the past 40 years. The goal of the Project is to construct a new operations master planned facility that would efficiently accommodate existing and future needs for the city. Changes to the existing circulation network would be limited to improved connections to Orion Drive and Orion Way that would not affect any surrounding roadways. The proposed improvements are in the Open Space zoning designation and require a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Commission for public and quasi-public office buildings and accessory utility buildings and facilities. The Project also requires a waiver from the Open Space zone’s standard 25- foot height; however, CMC section 21.33.060 allows for a waiver of the height standard subject to 1 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 1 of 159 Staff Report 0 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 2 approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. Since this Project involves a Process 2 Conditional Use Permit for the proposed public/quasi-public use that is approved by the Planning Commission, approval of the Process 2 Conditional Use Permit captures the height waiver. Earthwork will consist of 4,440 cubic yards of cut and 6,918 cubic yards of fill. Project construction would last approximately 18 months and would begin in the fall of 2024. All aspects of the Project are anticipated to be constructed in a single phase. Table A below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the Project site and surrounding properties. TABLE A – SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE Location General Plan Designation Zoning Current Land Use Site Public (P) Open Space (OS) 8.5-acre fleet maintenance building, open air automobile washing and refueling station, and storage yard. North Open Space (OS) Open Space (OS) Open Space Preservation (Carlsbad Oak North County Preserve), Catholic Charities La Posada Homeless Shelter South Public (P), Planned Industrial (PI) Open Space (OS), Industrial (M) Fire Station #5, Palomar Transfer Station East Public (P), Open Space (OS) Open Space (OS) Safety Training Center, Open Space Preservation (Carlsbad Oak North County Preserve) West Planned Industrial (PI) Industrial (MQ) (within the Qualified Development Overlay Zone) Industrial Buildings Zoning and Project Permitting The Project includes architectural features that are consistent with the adjacent Safety Center and Safety Training Center. The Project includes the following development components: • One 41,900-square-foot (SF) two-story office operations building; • Three warehouse/shop buildings totaling 25,690 SF; • One 11,230 SF covered outdoor storage area; • One 92,300 SF four-story parking structure; • One 4,050 SF stacked vehicle covered storage area; • One 640 SF carwash; • One 20,000 SF materials yard; • Remodeling of existing vehicle maintenance building. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 2 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 3 Two-Story Office Operations Building (41,900 SF) The two-story office building will be located near the southwest corner of the Project site at the intersection of Orion Street and Orion Way. The first story of the office building would consist of office space with a south-facing front entrance oriented toward visitor parking north of Orion Way. The first floor would contain a lobby, offices, conference rooms, locker rooms, break rooms, and restrooms. Two outdoor patio areas would be accessible from the break rooms on the north side of the building. The second floor would consist of office space. At the eastern end of the second floor, a pedestrian bridge would provide a walkway connection to the second story of the proposed parking structure. This office building would be home to several city departments including the Construction Management and Inspection Division, Public Works Fleet and Facilities Division, Public Works Utilities Division, and Parks & Recreation Department. Altogether, the 41,900 SF building would be able to accommodate 143 staff members from the above-mentioned departments. The Project would free up the following three existing sites in the city for redevelopment: • Public Works Utilities Division at 5950 El Camino Real; • The Public Works Fleet and Facilities Division at 405 Oak Avenue; • Parks and Recreation Maintenance Division at 1166 Carlsbad Village Drive However, these three abandoned sites would remain vacated and unchanged until redevelopment were proposed and approved as separate actions independent of this Project. Three Warehouse/Shop Buildings (25,690 SF) The three warehouse/shop buildings will be located to the north of the two-story office building, with surface parking available between them. The building for the Public Works Utilities Division would be on the western end of the site. The building for the Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division would be centrally located. The building for the Parks & Recreation Department would be located next to the four-level parking structure. The second floors of the Public Works Utilities and Fleet Facilities warehouses would each include a 2,400 SF mezzanine level. Four-Story Parking Structure (92,300 SF) The proposed parking structure will have 225 vehicle spaces, including 16 dedicated to EV parking. The four-level parking structure will also have 14 EV parking stalls on the south side of the building and 16 parking stalls on the north side of the building. The total amount of parking, including both structured and surface spaces, would equal 396 stalls. To enhance accessibility to the new office building, a pedestrian bridge will be installed at the western end of the second floor of the parking structure. Furthermore, visitor parking will be accessible via Orion Way, while employees will have a gated entrance access to the north of the new office building, off the intersection of Orion Street and Impala Drive. Additional Improvements In addition to the new facilities described above, the Project would also remodel the existing fleet maintenance building in the northwestern part of the Project site. These improvements would raise the northeastern portion of the roof to match the building height, expand the building by 530 feet and make interior improvements. The existing fleet yard adjacent to the maintenance building would include upgraded and reoriented vehicle washing and refueling stations and covered storage areas. The improved vehicle washing and refueling stations would be at the same location as the existing stations. They would April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 3 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 4 include a shade canopy and an improved containment system for the runoff of chemicals used during vehicle cleaning. The Project would also introduce eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy hydromodification requirements. The project would also extend sidewalks along the northern side of Orion Way. Lastly, solar photovoltaic (PV) panels would be installed on the roof of the office building and the parking structure to support the goals of the Climate Action Plan. III. ANALYSIS The Project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: A. General Plan B. Open Space Zone and Conditional Use Permit (Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) Chapters 21.33 and 21.42, respectively) C. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan D. Growth Management Program The recommendation for approval of this Project was developed by analyzing the Project’s consistency with the applicable city regulations and policies. The Project’s compliance with each of the above regulations is summarized below and detailed in the attached Planning Commission resolution. A. General Plan TABLE B – GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Land Use & Community Design Goal 2-G.3: Promote infill development that makes efficient use of limited land supply, while ensuring compatibility and integration with existing Uses The City of Carlsbad Orion Center will centralize the city’s maintenance and operations functions into a single location on Orion Way, on a city-owned site adjacent to the city’s existing Safety Center. The Project’s co-location goal is to increase operational efficiency, reduce environmental impacts to the community and improve cross training, and collaboration. The Project would also free up the following three existing sites in the city for redevelopment: Public Works Utilities Division at 5950 El Camino Real; The Public Works Fleet and Facilities Division at 405 Oak Avenue; Yes Policy 2-G.21: Ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided in a timely manner to preserve the quality of life for residents. Policy 2-P.30: Require new industrial development to be located in modern attractive, well designed and landscaped industrial parks in which each site adequately provides for internal traffic, parking, loading, storage, and other operational needs April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 4 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 5 ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Parks and Recreation Maintenance Division at 1166 Carlsbad Village Drive Sustainability Goal 9-P.2: Continue efforts to decrease use of energy and fossil fuel consumption in municipal operations, including transportation, waste reduction and recycling, and efficient building design and use. Consistent with city policies on environmental sustainability, the office building would be designed to achieve equivalence with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating level of silver or higher. Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels would be installed on the roof of the office building and the parking structure to support a goal of reaching a net-zero energy use facility. The Project also includes a total of 30 new EV parking stalls. In addition, the Project would further reduce regional VMT compared to the existing condition because the consolidated site would improve efficiency of operations by reducing/eliminating other types of trips occurring between separate facilities for each department. Yes Public Safety Goal 6-G.3: Maintain safety services that are responsive to citizen’s needs to ensure a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community. The new Orion Center will consolidate three city departments and be located next to the existing Safety Center. The City of Carlsbad Faraday Building is 1.7 miles away. The proximity of city departments and being in a central part of the city would reduce travel times and be more responsive to citizen’s needs. Yes Mobility Policy 3-P.39: Require new employment development to provide secure bicycle parking on- site. Major employers should provide shower and changing rooms for employees as appropriate. The Project includes bicycle parking on-site and a shower and changing rooms for employees within the new office building. Yes Open Space Goal 4-G.3: Protect environmentally sensitive lands, wildlife habitats, and rare, The Project site is located within the boundaries of Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) and Yes April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 5 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 6 ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY threatened or endangered plant and animal communities. within the HMP Hardline Mandana Preserve Area. However, the Project would not extend beyond the existing chain link fence that separates the existing city buildings from the HMP Hardline Mandana Preserve Area. The Project avoids or mitigates all impacts to a level of less than significant, as outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study. Mitigation measures were developed to reduce potential impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Goal 4-P.9: Maintain and implement the city’s Habitat Management Plan (HMP), including the requirement that development projects comply with the HMP and related documents. Require assessments of biological resources prior to approval of any development on sites with sensitive habitat. 4-P.59: Implement water pollution prevention methods to the maximum extent practicable, supplemented by pollutant source controls and treatment. Use small collection strategies located at, or close as possible to, the source to minimize the transport of urban runoff and pollutants offsite and into a municipal separate storm sewer system. The Project design BMPs would include eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy both water quality and hydromodification requirements. These proposed BMPs would detail and treat water used to clean vehicles and storm runoff associated with new, replaced, and existing impervious surfaces such as the parking lot and buildings. Yes B. Open Space Zone and Conditional Use Permit (CMC chapters 21.33 and 21.42) The Project is located in the Open Space and is subject to the land use regulations in the Zoning Ordinance, Title 21 of the CMC. In the Open Space Zone, new government office buildings are categorized as “public/quasi-public building and facilities and accessory buildings/facilities” and are subject to a Process 2 Conditional Use Permit, approved by the Planning Commission with the potential for appeal to the City Council. The parking lot is identified as a permitted accessory use. To approve the required Conditional Use Permit, CMC Chapter 21.42 requires the Planning Commission to make four findings. The four findings and brief explanations of how they can be made are provided below. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 6 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 7 1. Finding: That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan. Response: The City of Carlsbad Orion Center will centralize the city’s maintenance and operations functions into a single location on Orion Way, on a city-owned site adjacent to the city’s existing Safety Center. The Project’s co-location goal is to increase operational efficiency, reduce environmental impacts to the community and improve cross training, and collaboration. The Project site is not located within a Master Plan Area or the Coastal Zone and is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission. 2. Finding: That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Response: The Project would be located within an established City of Carlsbad Public Works and Public Safety complex. All work would be located within the existing complex and would not impact any surrounding properties or affect existing land use patterns. The Project avoids or mitigates all impacts to a level of less than significant, as outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study. Mitigation measures were developed to reduce potential impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. 3. Finding: That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner, Planning Commission or City Council, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Response: The site for the Project is adequate for the proposed uses and facilities and the proposed project is compatible in character with the surrounding uses and structures. The proposal requires a waiver from the Open Space zone’s standard 25-foot height; however, CMC section 21.33.060 allows for a waiver of the height standard subject to approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. Since this Project involves a Process 2 Conditional Use Permit for the proposed public/quasi-public use that is approved by the Planning Commission, approval of the Process 2 Conditional Use Permit captures the height waiver. Two proposed structures exceed the 25 feet in height: the office building (33 feet) and the parking structure (55 feet). These buildings are consistent with the surrounding development such as the adjacent Safety Training Center, including the training tower which has a height of 56 feet. Further, due to topography, intervening structures and vegetation, and setbacks from property lines the proposed buildings have limited visibility from Faraday Avenue and can only be seen from local roadways such as Orion Street, Impala Way, and Orion Way to the south. Developed and developable surrounding properties to the north and east and Faraday Avenue are several hundred feet or more from the Project site and the proposed improvements would appear as a continuation of existing development. The Project has also been designed consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code setback requirements to minimize fire risk, and Project landscaping would be consistent with the requirements of the city’s adopted Landscape Manual as it relates to both fire protection and water efficiency. 4. Finding: That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 7 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 8 Response: Changes to the existing circulation network would be limited to improved connections to Orion Drive and Orion Way that would not affect any surrounding roadways. No new roadways or expansion of roadways would be required to accommodate the Project based on the Local Mobility Assessment conducted by Chen Ryan Associates consistent with the city’s transportation impact guidelines. C. Airport Land Use Compatibility The Project site is approximately one-half mile northeast of McClellan Palomar Airport and is subject to the policies and standards outlined in the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). As identified in the ALCUCP, the Project site is in the Airport Impact Area in Safety Zone 6-Traffic Pattern Zone. Safety Zone 6 is the least restrictive zone and encompasses a larger area than the other five zones combined. The ALUCP states that the risks in Zone 6 are much lower than the risks in other zones and indicates that all types of development are considered compatible or conditionally compatible with Safety Zone 6. The city has obtained a Part 77 determination from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that the Project would pose no hazard to air navigation (Appendix F; FAA 2019). D. Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90) and Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5 The city has developed a Growth Management Plan (GMP) to ensure all development is consistent with the General Plan and providing adequate facilities that keep pace with population growth. The GMP establishes performance standards for public facilities; most relevant to the project are performance standards relating to city administrative facilities and circulation. The Project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 in the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the Project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table C below. TABLE C – GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Standard Impacts Comply City Administration N/A Yes Library N/A Yes Wastewater Treatment The Project design BMPs would include eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy both water quality and hydromodification requirements. These proposed BMPs would detail and treat water used to clean vehicles and storm runoff associated with new, replaced, and existing impervious surfaces such as the parking lot and buildings. Yes Parks N/A Yes Drainage 27.01 CFS Yes April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 8 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 9 Circulation 1,120 ADT Yes Fire Station No. 5 Yes Open Space N/A Yes Schools N/A Yes Sewer Collection Systems The Project design BMPs would include eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy both water quality and hydromodification requirements. These proposed BMPs would detail and treat water used to clean vehicles and storm runoff associated with new, replaced, and existing impervious surfaces such as the parking lot and buildings. Yes Water 11,520 GPD Yes IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Protection Ordinance (Title 19) of the CMC, staff conducted an environmental impact assessment (initial study, or IS) for the proposed Project and associated permits. The assessment identified potentially significant impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. In addition, a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis conducted by Fehr and Peers (Exhibit 5) found that the Project may reduce VMT by centralizing various maintenance and operation centers and relocate associated employees to the new consolidated location. As a result, the Project would only redistribute existing trips and will not add any new trips to the roadway network. Lastly, as a condition of approval, that applicant will implement a Tier 3 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan per Carlsbad Municipal Code section 18.51 to reduce Project VMT. Mitigation measures were incorporated into the design of the Project or included in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) such that all potentially significant impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance. Staff circulated a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) that included the MMRP. Mitigation measures were included for impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. The full IS/MND and MMRP are included as Exhibit 5 to the Planning Commission Resolution for approval of the environmental document. The mitigation measures are included in the MMRP and will be implemented during project construction and operation. A Notice of Intent to adopt an MND was published in the newspaper, posted on the city’s website, and sent to the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse for public review. The requisite 30-day public review April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 9 of 159 CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) – CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER April 5, 2023 Page 10 period for the MND was Initiated on January 27, 2023. The notice provided a city website link to the full Draft IS/MND and Project plans. At the end of the 30-day review period, on February 26, 2023, the city received no comments. V.DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY The proposed Project is subject to the Early Public Notice and the Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach processes outlined in City Council Policy No. 84 – Development Project Public Involvement Policy. The policy requires applicants of certain development projects to provide an opportunity for and consider input from interested and affected stakeholders prior to project consideration by the Planning Commission or City Council. Because the project is a development proposal requiring a Conditional Use Permit, it is subject to the policy. Following the submission of an application for a Conditional Use Permit on Dec. 5, 2018, an Early Public Notice was mailed on Jan. 3, 2019, to businesses within a 600-foot radius. There are no residences within this radius. The early public notice was combined with an enhanced mailing to all businesses located east of El Camino Real, between Cougar Drive and Palomar Airport Road, and east of Orion Street. A Project website was created that allowed the public to learn more about and submit comments and questions on the Project. Information on the website included a Project description and the proposed plans. The website also details the Project permits are subject to Planning Commission approval at a noticed public hearing. Details regarding how to access the website were provided in the notice of permit application and enhanced stakeholder outreach mailed to businesses within 600 feet of the Project site. As a result of the public notice letter, on Jan. 18, 2019, the property owner at 2469 Impala Drive (directly to the west of the Project site), commented in favor of the Project. No other interested parties contacted staff about the proposed Project (Exhibit 4). Policy No. 84 identifies various methods to provide interested and affected community members a meaningful opportunity to provide input, including through a website that enables the public to learn about a Project and understand how to provide input. Accordingly, applicant outreach conducted as described satisfies policy requirements. EXHIBITS: 1.Planning Commission Resolution – Mitigated Negative Declaration Approval 2.Planning Commission Resolution – Conditional Use Permit Approval 3.Location map 4.Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach Report 5.Final Initial Study/Mitigated Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6.Reduced Exhibits 7. 11x17 Exhibits “A” - “CC” dated Apr. 5, 2023 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 10 of 159 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7474 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TO ALLOW FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING 8.5 ACRE FLEET MAINTENANCE FACILITY AND STORAGE YARD "ORION CENTER" LOCATED AT 2600 ORION WAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 CASE NAME: CASE NO.: CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) Exhibit 1 WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, has filed a verified application regarding property the city owns, described as Assessor Parcel Number 209-050-26-00 {"the Property"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the CEQA and its implementing regulations {the State CEQA Guidelines), Article 14 of the California Code of Regulations section 15000 et. seq., the city is the Lead Agency for the project, as the public agency with the principal responsibility for approving the proposed project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.1 and CEQA Guidelines section 15063, a Mitigated Negative Declaration {MND) shall be prepared when an Initial Study {IS) identifies potentially significant project related impacts, but can be classified as less than significant after incorporating mitigation actions that can be taken to avoid or mitigate impacts to a point where clearly no significant impacts on the environment will occur; and WHEREAS, the city provided notice of the availability of the MND and its intent to adopt an IS/MND to and sought comments from all interested individuals and agencies on the MND as required by CEQA: A. Publishing "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration" in the "The Coast News" newspaper on Jan. 27, 2023. B.Submitting a notice to the State Clearinghouse for posting. C.Providing copies of the notice to individuals and organizations that previously submitted written requests for the notice. D.Posting of the notice and MND on the City of Carlsbad Planning Division webpage; and April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 11 of 159 WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said project, and released for public review for a period of 30 days starting on January 27, 2023 in conformance with Public Resources Code section 21091{b) and CEQA Guidelines sections 15072 and 15105{b). The city received no comment letters during the 30-day public comment period. ; and WHEREAS, upon approving a project for which an MND is adopted, the Lead Agency must also adopt a Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15074(d); and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on April 5, 2023, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Mitigated Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows; A.That the foregoing recitations are true and correct and material to this resolution; and are incorporated herein by reference. B.The custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad, 1200 Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. C.The Planning Commission after considering the public comments received, the evidence and testimony before it, and after exercising its independent judgment and review, does hereby certify that the IS/MND, inclusive of the response to comments, has been prepared in accordance and full compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, has been made available and circulated for review and comment by interested members of the public and relevant agencies as required by law, and has been presented to, reviewed -2-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 12 of 159 and considered by this Planning Commission prior to the decision on the project. Therefore, the Planning Commission does hereby find that on the basis of the whole record before it, that there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised and conditioned, will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission hereby ADOPTS the IS/MND and MMRP (Exhibit 5) incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein, as the valid environmental review for this project, based on the following findings: D.That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby ADOPTS the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Exhibit "MND," according to Exhibits "Notice of Intent {NOi)," and "Environmental Impact Assessment Form -Initial Study {EIA)," attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings: Findings: 1.The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find: a.it has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration CUP 2018- 0022 the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon prior to APPROVING of the project; and b.the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and c..it reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad; and d.based on the EIA and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. e.mitigation measures were developed to reduce potential impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. The project applicant has agreed to implement all mitigation measures identified in the Final IS/MND in order to reduce all potentially significant environmental impacts to a less-than significant level, in accordance with the MMRP. Mitigation measures shall be incorporated as part of the project's conditions of approval to reduce impacts to a level less than significant. f.The Final IS/MND constitutes an adequate, accurate, objective, and complete document in compliance with all legal standards. In determining whether the proposed project has a significant effect and has complied with Public Resources Code section 21082.2 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091{b). g.The Record of Proceedings has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the findings related to the Final IS/MND, taken together, reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission. -3-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 13 of 159 NOTICE An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be filed with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission's decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on the appeal prior to any judicial review. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on April 5, 2023, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Kamenjarin, Meenes, Merz, Sabellico, and Stine NAYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Lafferty Peter Merz, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ERIC LARDY City Planner -4-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 14 of 159 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7475 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE EXISITING 8.5 ACRE FLEET MAINTENNCE FACILITY AND STORAGE YARD "ORION CENTER" LOCATED AT 2600 ORION WAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5 CASE NAME: CASE NO.: CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) Exhibit 2 WHEREAS, City of Carlsbad, "Developer," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by City of Carlsbad, "Owner," described as Assessor Parcel Number 209-050-26-00 {"the Property"); and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said project, reviewed and adopted consistent with the findings in Planning Commission Resolution; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" -"CC" dated April 5, 2023, on file in the Planning Division, CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER, CUP 2018-0022, as provided by Chapter 21.42 and/or 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on April 5, 2023, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of c;1II persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the CUP. WHEREAS, on April 5, 2023, the Planning Commission/City Council approved CUP 2018- 0022, as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A.That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 15 of 159 B.That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CUP 2018-022, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1.That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the �ommunity, and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan, or master plan. in that the Orion Center will centralize the city's maintenance and operations functions into a single location on Orion Way, on a city-owned site adjacent to the city's existing Safety Center. The project's co-location goal is to increase operational efficiency, reduce environmental impacts on the community and improve cross-training, and collaboration. The Project site is not located within a Master Plan Area or the Coastal Zone and is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission. 2.That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the project would be located within an established City of Carlsbad Public Works and Public Safety complex. All work would be located within the existing complex and would not impact any surrounding properties or affect existing land use patterns. The project avoids or mitigates all impacts to a level of less than significant, as outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study. Mitigation measures were developed to reduce potential impacts to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. 3.That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the City Planner, planning commission or City Council, in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The site for the Project is adequate for the proposed uses and facilities and the proposed project is compatible in character with the surrounding uses and structures. The proposal requires a waiver from the Open Space zone's standard 25-foot height; however, CMC section 21.33:060 allows for a waiver of the height standard subject to approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. Since this Project involves a Process 2 Conditional Use Permit for the proposed public/quasi-public use that is approved by the Planning Commission, approval of the Process 2 Conditional Use Permit captures the height waiver. Two proposed structures exceed the 25 feet in height: the office building (33 feet) and the parking structure (55 feet). These buildings are consistent with the surrounding development such as the adjacent Safety Training Center, including the training tower which has a height of 56 feet. Further, due to topography, intervening structures and vegetation, and setbacks from property lines the proposed buildings have limited visibility from Faraday Avenue and can only be seen from local roadways such as Orion Street, Impala Way, and Orion Way to the south. Developed and developable surrounding properties to the north and east and Faraday Avenue are several hundred feet or more from the Project site and the proposed improvements would appear as a continuation of existing development. The Project has also been designed consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code setback requirements to minimize fire risk, and Project landscaping would be consistent with the requirements of the city's adopted Landscape Manual as it relates to both fire protection and water efficiency. -2-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 16 of 159 4.That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use, in that changes to the existing circulation network would be limited to improved connections to Orion Drive .and Orion Way that would not affect any surrounding roadways. No new roadways or expansion of roadways would be required to accommodate the project. Changes to the existing circulation network would be limited to improved connections to Orion Drive and Orion Way that would not affect any surrounding roadways. No new roadways or expansion of roadways would be required to accommodate the Project based on the Local Mobility Assessment conducted by Chen Ryan Associates consistent with the city's transportation impact guidelines. Conditions: NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permits, whichever occurs first. 1.If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the city's approval of this Conditional Use Permit.I 2.Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Conditional Use Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 3.Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4.If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 5.Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) city's approval and issuance of this Conditional Use Permit, (b) city's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives -3-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 17 of 159 until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the city's approval is not validated. 6.Prior to submittal of the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit to the City Planner, a 24" x 36" copy of the (Tentative Map/Site Plan or other), conceptual grading plan and preliminary utility plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision-making body. The copy shall be submitted to the City Planner, reviewed and, if found acceptable, signed by the city's project planner and project engineer. If no changes were required, the approved exhibits shall fulfill this condition. 7.This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. This approval is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit and is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions for those other approvals incorporated herein by reference. 8.This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 9.CUP 2018-0022 shall be reviewed by the City Planner annually to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general welfare. If the City Planner determines that: 1) the Conditional Use Permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval was granted is not being exercised; or 3) the Conditional Use Permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval or the conditions of approval have not been met; or 4) the use for which such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 5) the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 6) the use permitted by the Conditional Use Permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance, the City Planner shall recommend that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing and after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, the Planning Commission may revoke and te�minate the Conditional Use Permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the Conditional Use Permit, modify the conditions or impose new conditions. 10.This Conditional Use Permit is granted without an expiration date. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. Engineering Conditions NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. -4-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 18 of 159 General 11.Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed haul route. 12.Developer shall include rain gutters on the building plans subject to the city engineer's review and approval. Developer shall install rain gutters in accordance with said plans. 13.Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition. 14.Property owner shall maintain all landscaping (street trees, tree grates, shrubs, groundcover, etc.) and irrigation along the parkway frontage with Orion Way and Orion Street as shown on the Site Plan. 15.Prior to building permit issuance developer shall show all transportation demand management infrastructure measures on the building plans. 16.Fees/ Agreements 17.Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation, the city's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 18.Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. 19.Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for "recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement. 20.Developer shall cause property owner to apply for, execute, and submit, to the city engineer for recordation, an Encroachment Agreement covering private sewer and storm drain located over existing or proposed public right-of-way or easements as shown on the site plan. Developer shall pay processing fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 21.Developer shall implement transportation demand management strategies per Carlsbad Municipal Code section 18.51. The final transportation demand management plan shall be in conformance with latest transportation demand management handbook at the time of building application. Prior to' building permit issuance, the Developer shall have a consultation with city staff regarding submittal of the final Transportation Demand Management Plan. Prior to occupancy, the Developer shall obtain an approved final Tier 3 Transportation Demand Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Engineering Manager. 22.Prior to building permit occupancy, the developer shall install all transportation demand management infrastructure measures, in accordance with the project's Transportation Demand -5-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 19 of 159 Grading 23. Management Plan, as shown on the site plan, including but not limited to the following, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Manager. a.) Secure bike parking b.) Public bike racks c.) Passenger loading for ride share d.) Showers and changing room e.) Designated parking spaces for car/vanpool parking Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports as required by city engineer, post security and pay all applicable grading plan review and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 24.Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the contractor shall submit a Construction Plan to the city engineer for review and approval. Said Plan may be required to include, but not be limited to, identifying the location of the construction trailer, material staging, bathroom facilities, parking of construction vehicles, employee parking, construction fencing and gates, obtaining any necessary permission for off-site encroachment, addressing pedestrian safety, and identifying time restrictions for various construction activities. 25.Concurrent with the grading plans Developer shall include shoring plans as part of the grading plans to the satisfaction of the city engineer and building official. Structural calculations for all shoring shall be submitted for review and approval by the building division. Developer shall pay all deposits necessary to cover any 3rd party review. Storm Water Quality 26.Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 27.Developer shall submit for city approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall identify and incorporate measures to reduce storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 28.This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Quality Management Plan {SWQMP), subject to city engineer approval, to comply with the Carlsbad BMP Design Manual latest version. The final SWQMP -6-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 20 of 159 required by this condition shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer with final grading plans. Developer shall pay all applicable SWQMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 29.Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc) incorporate all source control, site design, pollutant control BMP and applicable hydromodification measures. Dedications/Improvements 30.Developer shall cause owner to quitclaim a portion of the existing public water easement granted to Carlsbad Municipal Water District {CMWD) recorded 7/3/1985 as file number 85-239777 within Parcel 82-0001-A of grant deed to the City of Carlsbad per document 82-201566. 31.Developer shall cause owner to dedicate public street right-of-way, as necessary, to facilitate the design of the street, sidewalk and parkway section. 32.Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems {12" diameter storm drain and larger) shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees for private drainage systems. 33.Prior to any work in city right-of-way or public easements, Developer shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way permit to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 34.Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard development Improvement Agreement to install and shall post security in accordance with Section 20.16.070 for public improvements shown on the site plan. Said improvements shall be installed to city standards to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not limited to: A.Waterline B.Sidewalk C.Pedestrian Ramps Additional public improvements required in other conditions of this resolution are hereby included in the above list by reference. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees in accordance with the fee schedule. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. 35.Developer shall design, and obtain approval from the city engineer, the structural section for the access aisles with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with city standards due to truck access through the parking area and/or aisles with average daily trips greater than 500. Prior to completion of grading, the final structural pavement design of the aisle ways shall be submitted together with required R-value soil test information subject to the review and approval of the city engineer. -7-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 21 of 159 36.Developer is responsible to ensure utility transformers or raised water backflow preventers that serve this development are located outside the right-of-way as shown on the site plan and to the satisfaction of the engineering manager. These facilities shall be constructed within the property. Utilities 37.Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project 38.Developer shall design and agree to construct public facilities, including a 10" waterline and appurtenances, within the public right-of-way of Orion Way and Orion Street. This 10" waterline will replace the existing 10" AC waterline within the site as shown on the site plans. This condition supersedes the proposed waterline alignment shown on the site plan. 39.The developer shall agree to design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Community Development Department for processing and approval by the district engineer. 40.Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at locations· approved by CMWD engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 41.The developer shall design and agree to construct public water facilities substantially as shown on the site plan to the satisfaction of the CMWD engineer and city engineer. 42.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit detailed design drawings and studies for the construction of a private sewer system required to serve the project. Said drawings and studies shall be prepared and submitted to the satisfaction of the building official. 43.The developer shall obtain permission from SDG&E to perform work within their easement as depicted on the site plan. Traffic and Mobility 44.The developer shall construct improvements to the intersection of Orion Street and Faraday· Avenue including restriping the existing southbound left turn lane to accommodate a minimum of 26 linear feet of additional turn lane storage capacity. 45.The developer shall pay a fair-share contribution of 10.9% to reconstruct the center median at north leg of the intersection of El Camino Real and Faraday Avenue to extend the length of the southbound left turn lane by an additional 36 feet. 46.As part of the project's requirement to provide Transportation Systems Management mitigation the project shall pay for the installation of one traffic signal controller. -8-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 22 of 159 Code Reminders The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 47.Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the site plan are for planning purposes only. NOTICE TO APPLICANT An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be filed with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission's decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on the appeal prior to any judicial review. NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and ahy other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. -9-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 23 of 159 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on April 5, 2023, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Kamenjarin, Meenes, Merz, Sabellico, and Stine NAYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioner Lafferty CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ERIC LARDY City Planner -10-April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 24 of 159 ORIONST FARADAYAV IMPALADR ORION WY City of CarlsbadOrion Center Project ±Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions ofthe DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanGIS. All Rights Reserved 0 400 800200Feet CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) Project 600-Foot Radius Exhibit 3 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 25 of 159 • . ' ' :,: . ' ' ' . ' Exhibit 4 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 26 of 159 PUBLIC AND ENHANCED STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH REPORT Feb. 12,2019 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad,CA 92008 SUBJECT: Public Outreach Report for the Orion Center Project, 2600 Orion Way, CUP 2018-0022 The City of Carlsbad, in coordination with Roesling, Nakamura, Tarada {RNT) Architects, Inc. conducted a public outreach and enhanced stakeholder effort to initiate communication with city residents, nearby businesses and other stakeholders about this project. Following the submission of an application for a Conditional Use Permit on Dec. 5, 2018, an Early Public Notice was mailed out on Jan. 3, 2019 to businesses within a 600-foot radius. There are no residences within this radius, so only businesses were notified. The early public notice was combined with an enhanced mailing to all businesses located east of El Camino Real, between Couga r Drive and Palomar Airport Road, and east of Orion Street (see attached aerial of enhanced stakeholder public outreach around the Orion Center Project site). In addition, a Public Notice sign was posted on site on January 8, 2019. Per City Council Policy No. 84, applicants may choose one or more methods that will give interested and affected members of the public an opportunity to provide input. Since this project is located within a business park, and not near any residential properties, the applicant chose to combine the enhanced public outreach with the early public notice. The combined noticed included an elevation of the proposed Orion Center, contact information for the project manager and project planner, and a link to the city's website that included architectural renderings, building elevations and material of the proposed Orion Center. The notice also invited the interested parties to give any feedback on the proposed project. As a result of the public notice letter, on Jan. 18, 2019, Mr. Paul McKee, the owner of the property at 2469 Impala Drive, directly northwest of the proposed project, came to the planning counter at the Faraday Center and requested to see the plans for the Orion Center project. Pam Drew, project planner, reviewed the plans with Mr. McKee. Mr. McKee said he really liked the design of the proposed office building for the Orion Center and felt that once built, it would increase the value of his property. No other interested parties have contacted staff about the proposed project. Public Works Department Construction & Inspection Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2780 I 760-602-8560 fax April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 27 of 159 This concludes the Enhanced Stakeholder Outreach for this project as required by Council Policy No . 84. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Steven Stewart Municipal Projects Manager City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 602-7543 Steven .Stewa rt@ca rlsbadca .gov Exhibits: 1. Early Public Notice and Enhanced Public Outreach letter with website and contact information, dated January 3, 2019 2. Email from Pam Drew, Associate Planner regarding exchange with Mr. Paul McKee on January 18, 2019 3. Stakeholder Database 4. Aerial of enhanced stakeholder public outreach April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 28 of 159 Notice of Project in Your Neighborhood January 2, 2019 coy PROJECT NAME: CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER LOCATION: 2600 Orion Way EXHIBIT 1 -(_ City of Carlsbad (northeast corner of Orion Way and Orion Street) The City of Carlsbad is proposing to construct a maintenance and operations facility. This public notice is to let you know that a development application for a Conditional Use Permit project was submitted December 5, 2018, and is undergoing initial review by city staff. The city notifies neighbors of projects like this so they have an opportunity to learn what is being proposed and bring up any questions or concerns with the project team. If you would like more information, please visit is http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/depts/pw/orion.asp to see architectural drawings and color renderings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Carlsbad proposes to construct a 41,900 square-foot, two- story city operations office building, 26,000 square-foot warehouse storage and shop facilities, a 11,230 square-foot covered outdoor storage structure, a 91,000 square-foot parking structure (225 parking spaces), site utility improvements, landscape improvements, parking spaces for staff vehicles and upgrades to the existing fueling station. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result offurther staff and public review and comment. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you would like more information or would like to provide input on this project please contact: Pam Drew, Project Planner pam.drew@carlsba_dca.gov or 760-602-4644 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR REFERENCE Steven Stewart, Municipal Project Manager steven.stewart@carlsbadca.gov or 760-602.:.7543 Public Works Department 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) _ PARCEL NUMBER: APN: 209-050-26-00 Attachments: Site Plan and Rendering Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue I Ca rlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602~4600 I 760-602-8560 fax April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 29 of 159 SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE City of Carlsbad Orion Center CUP 2018-0022 EXHIBIT 1 Ap r i l 5 , 2 0 2 3 It e m # 1 P a g e 3 0 o f 1 5 9 EX H I B I T 1 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 31 of 159 CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES DEPT 5950 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD CA 92008 R I F Ill-IMPALA LLC 11601 WILSHIRE BLVD UNIT 650 LOS ANGELES CA 90025 ZUEST INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 17505 CAMINO BRISA DEL MAR SAN DIEGO CA 92127-2109 FINN FAMILY TRUST 07-12-02 203 BIRCHWOOD SANDPOINT ID 83864 - R J P PARTNERS LLC 2304 SKY CORRAL LN SAN MARCOS CA 92078 . IMPALA BUILDING LLC 2460 IMPALA DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 NEWMAN LLC 2544 MUIRFIELDS DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO 349 CEDAR ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 PELLO 5731 PALMER WAY STE D CARLSBAD CA 92010-7247 -PALMER WAY LLC PALMER WAY LLC 5741 PALMER WAY UNIT D CARLSBAD CA 92010 •• -• • .... 4 ----• ~--.. , ": ,. ' Pat:_ ave'.V,l=f~/Q~tent~~-. : ~ ~-·.f . ---~-.:.1~ .. c.JW· ,.,_ •--• ._#..,,, ~ . ---Easy Pe~I® Adc:iriss La-l:i=ef -~1 ~ Bend along line to expos_e Pop-~f_ctge · , 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD PROPERTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MNGT 1635 FARADAY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BECKMAN COULTER INC - C/O KAYE WILLIAMS 11800 SW 147TH AVE MIAMI FL 33196 KOLKER 2000 TRUST 10-19-00 1769 TURNBERRY DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 ACC Y INC C/O JASON BETHURIUM 2045 THOMAS AVE UNIT A SAN DIEGO CA 92109 VANGUARD INDUSTRIES WEST INC 2440 IMPALA DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 MCKEE PAUL 2469 IMPALA DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 ZHANG WUXING 3199 CORTE TAMARINDO CARLSBAD CA 92009 SCHOLL LILLIAN R TRUST (TRUST A) 444 N EL CAMINO REAL UNIT 119 ENCINITAS CA 92024 RYU REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LP C/O CHANG S RYU 5731 PALMER WAY UNIT C CARLSBAD CA 92010 -· GANZ FAMILY TRUST 12-07-01 5751 PALMER WAY UNIT D CARLSBAD CA 92010 SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY LAND SERVICES 8335 CENTURY PARK CT CP11 D SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SAND S PROPERTIES ACQUISITION LLC S AND S 1000 DEL NORTE LLC C/O B L T ENTERPRISES 171416TH ST SANTA MONICA CA 90404 J B G TRUST 09-09-05 1891 AVE MIMOSA ENCINITAS CA 92024 NWB CARLSBAD LLC WEST COAST SELF STORAGE GROUP LLC 211134TH ST SW EVERETT WA 98208-6411 MYRON L COMPANY 2450 IMPALA DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 J B B PROPERTIES LLC C/O H&P MOBILE GEOCHEMISTRY INC 2470 IMPALA DR CARLSBAD CA 92010 SHIVERS HOLDINGS LLC 3231 BUSINESS PARK DR UNIT C VISTA CA 92081 INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 550 W WASHINGTON AVE ESCONDIDO CA 92025 BROWN ARTHUR AND REBECCA REVOCABLE TRUST 07-15-94 5741 PALMER WAY UNIT B CARLSBAD CA 92010 GROSSE RUSSELL WAND MARYE 5850 SUNNY CREEK RD CARLSBAD CA 92010 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 32 of 159 CORNHAWKS LLC C/O STUART WOOD , 7090 CORINTIA ST ; CARLSBAD CA 92009 i I COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO PALOMAR AIRPORT 1. AIRPORTS ADMINISTRATION I I 1960 JOE CROSSON DRIVE ! EL CAJON CA 92020 I CARLSBAD GATEWAY CENTER LLC PO BOX256 LA JOLLA CA 92038 NEWMAN LLC : PO BOX 80828 SAN MARINO CA 91118 •~ ~ • , ~,~.,,,.F "'•:•~ .. .-,. _,,.,._-,:11 · Pat: a~;~ co~;pate'nts .. , , .· : . • , 1 , . \~ .,_ --,.,..,, .. ;ji,.r, ... ,~---;t..,,-4c ""· . .L:,. -·~-• ~ --.Ji r··· -E-;;;y-Pe~® Ald~ ~~o~I~ -· . ·r ~-Ben~ alo~g llnt to expos: ~o?-~~';;,, , __ -~ FENTON CARLSBAD LLC FENTON H G COMPANY 7577 MISSION VALLEY RD SAN DIEGO CA 92108 MANDANA CAL COMPANY PO BOX 10249 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC C/0 PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX29246 PHOENIX AZ 85038 TIME WARNER CABLE PACIFIC WEST LLC 7820 CRESCENT EXECUTIVE DR CHARLOTTE NC 28217 LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC . C/O AUDREY INSKEEP PO BOX 12409 EL CAJON CA 92022 RUHNAU DAVID RUHNAU PROPERTIES LLC C/O SHARON E RUHNAU PO BOX7209 RANCHO SANT A FE CA 92067 ..... . • .· April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 33 of 159 Steven Stewart From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Steven, Pam Drew Thursday, January 24, 2019 4:07 PM Steven Stewart Orion Center Stakeholder Outreach Comment Follow up Flagged EXHIBIT 2 Last Friday, January 18, 2019, the owner of the property at 2469 Impala Drive, Paul McKee, came to the Planning Counter and requested to look at the plans for the Orion Center. I reviewed the plans and color rendering with him. He said he really liked the design of the building and felt that once the building was built it would increase the value of his property. Please include this information in your final Stakeholder Report per Council Policy No. 84. Thank you, City of rlsbad Pam Drew Associate Planner 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 pam.drew@carlsbadca.gov Office#: 760-602-4644 1 Ap r i l 5 , 2 0 2 3 It e m # 1 P a g e 3 4 o f 1 5 9 ( City of Carlsbad Orion Center, CIP Project No. 3572 Stakeholder Register Scott I City Manager I City of I Internal I E-mail: Scott.Chadwick@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Chadwick Carlsbad Phone: (760) 434-2829 Address: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Paz Gomez I Public Works I City of I Internal I E-mail: Paz.Gomez@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Director Carlsbad Phone: (760) 602-2751 Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Craddock I Senior City of Internal E-mail: Craddock.Stropes@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Stropes Management Carlsbad Phone: (760) 602-2726 Analyst Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Kristina Ray I City City of Internal E-mail: Kristina.Ray@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Communication Carlsbad Phone: (760) 434-2937 Manager Address: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Marshall I Public Works City of Internal E-mail: Marshall.Plantz@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Plantz Transportation Carlsbad Phone: (760) 602-2766 Director Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Vicki I Public Works I City of I Internal I E-mail: Vicki.Quiram@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Quiram Utilities Director Carlsbad Phone: (760) 603-7307 Address: Orion Way John I Public Works City of Internal E-mail: John.Mashoff@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Maashoff General Services Carlsbad Phone: (760) 434-2856 Engineering Mgr Address: 405 Oak Street Kyle I Parks Services I City of I Internal I E-mai I: Kyle. La ncaste r@carlsbadca.gov I Supports Lancaster Manager Carlsbad Phone: (760) 434-2941 Address: 799 Pine Avenue EXHIBIT 3 Feb.1,2019 Ap r i l 5 , 2 0 2 3 It e m # 1 P a g e 3 5 o f 1 5 9 { City of Carlsbad Name Position /Role Babaq Taj I Public Works Engineering Manager Steven I Municipal Stewart Projects Manager Justin I Construction Di Rico Manager Lance I Construction Solomon Manager Orion Center, CIP Project No . 3572 Stakeholder Register Organization Internal/ Contacts external City of Internal E-mail: Babaq.Taj@carlsbadca.gov Carlsbad Phone: (760) 602-2766 Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue City of Internal E-mail: Steven.Stewart@carlsbadca.gov Carlsbad Phone: (760) 602-7543 Address: 1635 Faraday Ave. I Griffin Structures I External I E-mail: JDirico@GriffinStructures.com Phone: (949) 497-9000, x248 Address: 2 Technology Drive, #150, Irvine, CA I Griffin Structures I External I E-mail: LSolomon@GriffinStructures.com Phone: (949) 497-9000, x264 Address: 2 Technology Drive, #150, Irvine, CA Supports / Neutral / Resists I Supports I Supports I Supports I Supports Major Requirement EXHIBIT 3 Feb. 1,2019 Main Expectation April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 36 of 159 City of Carlsbad Orion Center CUP 2018-0022 N A 0 200 400 1,200 •-=====-•••-=====::::i Feet 800 Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanGIS. All Rights Reserved I I • !'. ; l I DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER PROJECT CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Carlsbad Public Works, Fleet & Facilities Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared by: RECON Environmental Inc. 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92108-5726 January 2023 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 37 of 159 {city of Carlsbad California Introduction CEQA requires local government agencies, prior to acting on projects over which they have discretionary approval authority, to consider the environmental consequences of such projects. This Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is the public document designed to provide the public and applicable responsible/trustee agencies, special districts, and local and state governmental agency decision-makers with an analysis of the potential environmental consequences of project implementation to support informed decision-making. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. The City of Carlsbad is serving as the Lead Agency for the proposed project and is also responsible for implementing this program. As the Lead Agency, the City of Carlsbad has the authority for project approval and adoption of the accompanying environmental documentation. Executive summary The city’s Orion Center Project would redevelop much of the existing 8.5-acre fleet maintenance facility and storage yard and adjacent vacant land bordered by Orion Street, Orion Way, and the existing city Safety Center. The project includes development of a 41,900 square foot (SF), two-story office building, three warehouse/shop buildings totaling 25,690 SF, and a 92,300 SF, four-story parking structure. Other project improvements include new storage areas, including a large covered outdoor storage area, an improved and repurposed materials storage yard, remodel of the existing fleet maintenance building, the addition of a shade canopy and new fuel dispensers at the existing fueling station. The project borders but would not impact adjacent habitat preserve to the north and east. A conditional use permit is required for the project. The project site is designated Public (P) in the General Plan and zoned as Open Space (OS). The zoning allows “public and quasi-public office buildings and accessory utility buildings and facilities” with a conditional use permit approved by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. At the hearing, the Commission will consider adoption of the IS/MND along with project approval. Summary of findings The IS/MND indicates that while the project could have environmental impacts, modifications and/or mitigation has been incorporated into the project to reduce its adverse impacts, thereby enabling the project to qualify for an MND (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15070). This is demonstrated in the summary list below and by both the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration and detailed Initial Study checklist. Summary list of environmental impacts: •The project would have no impact on agriculture and forest resources; mineral resources; population and housing; public services; and recreation. •The project would have a less than significant impact on aesthetics, air quality; cultural resources, energy; greenhouse gas emissions; hydrology and water quality; land use and planning; noise; transportation; utilities and service systems; and wildfire. •The project would have less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated on biological resources; geology and soils; hazards and hazardous materials; tribal cultural resources; and mandatory findings of significance. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 38 of 159 These findings do not mean the city’s decision on the project’s environmental impacts is final. The IS/MND is subject to modification based on comments received by interested agencies and the public. Identification of Mitigation Measures See Attachment A. IS/MND availability The IS/MND is on file in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, and available online at: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/departments/community- development/planning/agendas-minutes-notices Public comment period The public comment period of the IS/MND is January 27, 2023 to February 26, 2023. How to submit comments During the public comment period, written comments on the IS/MND may be submitted via mail or email to: • Izzak Mireles, Associate Planner 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • Izzak.mireles@carlsbadca.gov Attachments • A: List of Mitigation Measures • B: Mitigated Negative Declaration • C: Initial Study April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 39 of 159 1 Attachment A List of Mitigation Measures Biological Resources BIO-1: Mitigation for Impacts to Coastal California Gnatcatcher The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as construction occur during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season (February 15 through August 15) within 500 feet of potential coastal California gnatcatcher breeding habitat (i.e., coastal sage scrub): •A qualified biologist will conduct a single pre-construction survey in appropriate habitat within 500 feet of project activities no more than 3 days before the start of construction. If coastal California gnatcatcher is not identified, then no further species-specific mitigation would be required. If coastal California gnatcatcher is identified during the survey, the following additional mitigation measures would be required during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season: •The City will be notified immediately if coastal California gnatcatcher or other listed species is located during the pre-construction survey. •Fencing or other measures will be installed within a buffer of at least 500 feet from active nests. No work would be conducted within the buffer until the nest is no longer active or noise attenuation measures can be implemented to ensure that construction noise would not impact nesting success (see following measure). •During the breeding season, construction noise will be measured regularly to maintain a threshold at or below 60 A-weighted decibels hourly average noise level [dB(A) Leq] within 500 feet of breeding habitat occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher. If noise levels supersede the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented (City of Carlsbad 2008). BIO-2: Mitigation for Impacts to Raptors and Nesting Birds The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as vegetation removal or grading occur during the general bird breeding season (February 15 through August 31), which includes Cooper’s hawk and southern California rufous-crowned sparrow: •A qualified biologist will conduct a survey for active nests within appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and birds in the project site as well as an additional 500-foot survey buffer within three days of vegetation removal or construction. •If nests of federally or state listed birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are located, a protective buffer will be established around the nest by a qualified biologist. Buffer width for raptors and listed species will be 500 feet. Buffer width for other nesting species will be determined by a qualified biologist on a case by case basis. All construction activity will be prohibited within this area until the young have successfully fledged and the nest is no longer active. Exhibit 5 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 40 of 159 2 Geology And Soils GEO-1: Geotechnical Recommendations The project would be required to implement the geotechnical recommendations presented in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation. These include, but are not limited to, recommendations related to potentially compressible fill, cut/fill transitions, expansive soils, and difficult excavations. The geotechnical engineer should review project plans and specifications prior to bidding and construction to check that the intent of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation have been incorporated. Observations and tests should be performed during construction. If the conditions encountered during construction differ from those anticipated based on the subsurface exploration program, the presence of the geotechnical engineer during construction would enable an evaluation of the exposed conditions and modifications of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation or development of additional recommendations in a timely manner. PAL-1: Paleontological Resources Monitoring Implementation of a paleontological mitigation program, in the form of paleontological monitoring, is recommended for earthwork at the project site that will directly impact previously undisturbed strata mapped as the Lusardi Formation (or unmapped strata of the Point Loma Formation, if present). The paleontological mitigation program would include the following measures: a.Pre-construction (personnel and repository): Prior to the commencement of construction, a qualified Principal Paleontologist shall be retained to oversee the mitigation program. The City defines a Principal Paleontologist as a person with a graduate degree in paleontology, geology, or related field, and who has at least one year of prior experience as a principal investigator. In addition, a regional fossil repository shall be designated to receive any discovered fossils. Because the project is in San Diego County, the recommended repository is the San Diego Natural History Museum. b.Pre-construction (meeting): The Principal Paleontologist should attend the pre-construction meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules, paleontological field techniques, and safety issues. c.Pre-construction (training): The Principal Paleontologist shall conduct a paleontological resource contractor awareness training workshop to be attended by earth excavation personnel. d.During construction (monitoring): A paleontological monitor (working under the direction of the Principal Paleontologist) should be on-site on a full-time basis during all original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits mapped as the Lusardi Formation (moderate paleontological potential) and/or Point Loma Formation (high paleontological potential) to inspect exposures for unearthed fossils. Monitoring is recommended during earthwork that exceeds the depth of fill in the vicinity of the proposed general services building and general services warehouse/shop (southern portion of the site), which ranges from 2 to 11.5 feet thick, and during earthwork extending at least 1 foot below existing grade elsewhere within the site, including for the proposed parking structure (eastern portion of the site). April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 41 of 159 3 e.During construction (fossil recovery): If fossils are discovered, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them. Bulk sedimentary matrix samples may also be collected for stratigraphic horizons that appear likely to contain microscopic fossil remains. In most cases, this fossil salvage can be completed in a short period of time. However, some fossil specimens (e.g., a bone bed or a complete large skeleton) may require an extended salvage period. In these instances, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) has the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely manner. f.Post-construction (treatment): Fossil remains collected during monitoring and salvage should be prepared (including washing of sediments to recover microfossils), repaired, sorted, and cataloged as part of the mitigation program. g.Post-construction (curation): Prepared fossils, along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photos, and maps, should be deposited (as a donation) in the designated fossil repository. Donation of the fossils shall be accompanied by financial support for initial specimen storage. h.Post-construction (final report): A final summary paleontological mitigation report should be completed that outlines the results of the mitigation program. This report should include discussions of the methods used, stratigraphic section(s) exposed, fossils collected, inventory lists of catalogued fossils, and significance of recovered fossils. Hazards And Hazardous Materials HAZ-1: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment The City will retain a qualified environmental professional to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) consistent with ASTM standards to ascertain the extent of soils contamination. The City will subsequently consult with County DEH to determine appropriate measures to avoid or minimize health risk associated with soils contamination. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA and recommendations of the County DEH, subsequent investigations such as additional soils sampling or health risk assessment and remediation measures such as soils extraction, including soils extraction, groundwater pumping and treatment, or soil vapor extraction, may be required. Upon completion of soils investigations and any necessary remediation and prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer will review and approve a Construction Plan that avoids or minimizes health risks associated with soils contamination. HAZ-2: Soils Disposal Prior to soils investigations outlined in mitigation measure HAZ-1, The City will verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that any soils extracted from the project site including, but not limited to soils extraction for activities such as borings or samplings will be transported and disposed of consistent with State Administrative Manual (SAM) procedures for hazardous materials. Consistent with subsequent recommendations by the environmental professional performing the Phase II ESA required under HAZ-1 and County DEH, the City will also verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that potentially April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 42 of 159 4 contaminated soils extracted during soils investigations or soils remediation are transported and disposed of consistent with SAM procedures for hazardous materials. Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activities, the project developer shall: a.Retain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall be on-site for ground-disturbing activities. In the event cultural material is encountered, the archaeologist is empowered to temporarily divert or halt grading to allow for coordination with the Luiseño Native American monitor, or other Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated Luiseño tribe (“TCA Tribe”), and to determine the significance of the discovery. The archaeologist shall follow all standard procedures for cultural materials that are not Tribal Cultural Resources. b.Enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement, with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (SLRBMI) or other Luiseño tribe that meets all standard requirements of the tribe for such Agreements. This agreement will address provision of a Luiseño Native American monitor and contain provisions to address the proper treatment of any tribal cultural resources and/or Luiseño Native American human remains inadvertently discovered during the course of the project. The agreement will outline the roles and powers of the Luiseño Native American monitors and the archaeologist and may include the following provisions. In some cases, the language below may be modified in consultation with San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians if special conditions warrant. c.A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, archaeological studies, geotechnical investigations, clearing, grubbing, trenching, excavation, preparation for utilities and other infrastructure, and grading activities. d.Any and all uncovered artifacts of Luiseño Native American cultural importance shall be returned to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians, and/or the Most Likely Descendant, if applicable, and not be curated, unless ordered to do so by a federal agency or a court of competent jurisdiction. e.The Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present at the project’s preconstruction meeting to consult with grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules and safety issues, as well as to consult with the archaeologist PI (principal investigator) concerning the proposed archaeologist techniques and/or strategies for the project. f.Luiseño Native American monitors and archaeological monitors shall have joint authority to temporarily divert and/or halt construction activities. If tribal cultural resources are discovered during construction, all earth-moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area must be diverted until the Luiseño Native American monitor and the archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 43 of 159 5 g.If a significant tribal cultural resource(s) and/or unique archaeological resource(s) are discovered during ground-disturbing activities for this project, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians or other Luiseño tribe shall be notified and consulted regarding the respectful and dignified treatment of those resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and tribal cultural resources. If, however, the Applicant is able to demonstrate that avoidance of a significant and/or unique cultural resource is infeasible and a data recovery plan is authorized by the City of Carlsbad as the lead agency, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians shall be consulted regarding the drafting and finalization of any such recovery plan. h.When tribal cultural resources are discovered during the project, if the archaeologist collects such resources, a Luiseño Native American monitor must be present during any testing or cataloging of those resources. If the archaeologist does not collect the tribal cultural resources that are unearthed during the ground-disturbing activities, the Luiseño Native American monitor may, at their discretion, collect said resources and provide them to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians for dignified and respectful treatment in accordance with their cultural and spiritual traditions. i.If suspected Native American human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b) states that no further disturbance shall occur until the San Diego County Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. Suspected Native American remains shall be examined in the field and kept in a secure location at the site. A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during the examination of the remains. If the San Diego County Medical Examiner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted by the Medical Examiner within 24 hours. The NAHC must then immediately notify the “Most Likely Descendant” about the discovery. The Most Likely Descendant shall then make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultation concerning treatment of remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. j.In the event that fill material is imported into the project area, the fill shall be clean of tribal cultural resources and documented as such. Commercial sources of fill material are already permitted as appropriate and will be culturally sterile. If fill material is to be utilized and/or exported from areas within the project site, then that fill material shall be analyzed and confirmed by an archaeologist and Luiseño Native American monitor that such fill material does not contain tribal cultural resources. k.No testing, invasive or non-invasive, shall be permitted on any recovered tribal cultural resources without the written permission of the SLRBMI or any other Luiseño Native American consulting tribe. TCR-2: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and/or Evaluation Report Prior to the completion of project construction, a monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the monitoring program shall be submitted by the Project Archaeologist, along with the Luiseño Native American monitor’s notes and comments, to the City of Carlsbad for approval, and shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center. Said report shall be subject to confidentiality as an exception to the Public Records Act and will not be available for public distribution. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 44 of 159 Attachment B Community Development Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue  Carlsbad, CA 92008  760-602-4600  760-602-8560 fax MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT NAME: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project PROJECT NO: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) PROJECT LOCATION: 2600 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Carlsbad’s (city’s) Orion Center Project would redevelop much of the existing 8.5-acre fleet maintenance facility and storage yard and adjacent vacant land bordered by Orion Street, Orion Way, and the existing city Safety Center. The project includes development of a 41,900 square foot (SF), two-story office building, three warehouse/shop buildings totaling 25,690 SF, and a 92,300 SF, four-story parking structure. Other project improvements include new storage areas, including a large covered outdoor storage area, an improved and repurposed materials storage yard, remodel of the existing fleet maintenance building, the addition of a shade canopy and new fuel dispensers at the existing fueling station. The project borders but would not impact adjacent habitat preserve to the north and east. A conditional use permit is required for the project. The project site is designated Public (P) in the General Plan and zoned as Open Space (OS). The zoning allows “public and quasi-public office buildings and accessory utility buildings and facilities” with a conditional use permit approved by the Planning Commission. DETERMINATION: The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the Initial Study identified potentially significant effects on the environment, and the City of Carlsbad finds as follows: Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. The proposed project MAY have “potentially significant impact(s)” on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. (Mitigated Negative Declaration applies only to the effects that remained to be addressed). Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 45 of 159 □ □ C cityof Carlsbad A copy of the Initial Study documenting reasons to support the Mitigated Negative Declaration is attached, on file in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, and available online at https://www.carlsbadca.gov/departments/community-development/agendas-minutes-notices-18045. ADOPTED: ATTEST: Eric Lardy City Planner April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 46 of 159 Initial Study January 2023 -1-Initial Study Attachment C 1.PROJECT NAME: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project 2.PROJECT NO: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) 3.LEAD AGENCY: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 4.PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 5.LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON: Izzak Mireles Associate Planner, City of Carlsbad (442)339-2693 or izzak.mireles@carlsbadca.gov 6.PROJECT LOCATION: 2600 Orion Way, Carlsbad, California 7.GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: (P) Public 8.ZONING: (OS) Open Space 9.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project (project) is located at 2600 Orion Way, in the City of Carlsbad, California. Figure 1 provides the regional location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the project location on a United States Geographic Survey (USGS) topographic map. The project site is zoned Open Space (OS) and the General Plan land use designation is Public (P). The 8.5-acre project site is predominately asphalt paved, with several islands with ornamental trees scattered throughout. Existing development on the site includes a fleet maintenance building at the northwest corner, an open-air vehicle washing and refueling station near the center of the project site, and a central equipment plant that houses a cooling tower, boiler, and generator at the southeast corner of the project site. The site is currently used for fleet maintenance, parking, and outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment, and materials. The project site and surrounding land uses are shown in Figure 3. The existing site orientation, including the vehicle washing and fueling station and parking areas, was not strategically planned; rather, features were added individually over the past 40 years. The goal of the project is to construct a new operations master planned facility that would efficiently accommodate existing and future needs of the: (1) Construction Management and Inspection Division; (2) Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division (Street, Storm Drain, Facilities and Fleet Maintenance and Facilities Engineering); (3) Public Works Utilities Division (Water, Recycled Water, Wastewater Collection and Operations, Utilities Engineering and Asset Management); and (4) Parks & Recreation Department (Parks and Tree Maintenance). The proposed facility would accommodate 143 staff members from these existing facilities. The project would free up three existing sites in the city for redevelopment: The Public Works Utilities Division at 5950 El Camino Real, the Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division at 405 Oak Avenue, and the Parks and Tree Maintenance Division of the Parks & Recreation Department at 1166 Carlsbad Village Drive. However, these three abandoned sites would remain vacated and unchanged until redevelopment were proposed and approved as separate actions independent of this project. The City’s Real Estate Strategic Plan, adopted 2017, and April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 47 of 159 C cityof Carlsbad Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -2-Initial Study its latest update for the period January – December 2020, do not identify any specific future use for the two Public Works properties and instead report the following: •Public Works Utility Division at 5950 El Camino Real: When the property is no longer needed due to completion of the Orion Center, the plan recommends the city issue a competitive request for proposal (RFP) for lease of the property. •Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division at 405 Oak Avenue: When the property is no longer needed due to completion of the Orion Center, the plan recommends the city release a competitive RFP and enter a long-term land lease of the property. The Parks and Tree Maintenance Division of the Parks and Recreation Department at 1166 Carlsbad Village Drive is not addressed by the Real Estate Strategic Plan. It is part of the overall existing City Hall complex, which also has been identified as the location for a new City Hall by City Council action on Aug. 16, 2022. Based on this action, the city can start the process of planning for a rebuilt City Hall and library, including updated cost estimates and timelines. Figure 4 presents the proposed site plan. The project includes the following development components: •One 41,900-square-foot (SF) two-story office operations building; •Two 9,870 SF warehouse/shop buildings, one for Public Works Utilities and one for Public Works Fleet & Facilities totaling 19,740 SF; •One 5,950 SF warehouse/shop building for the Parks & Recreation Department; •One 11,230 SF covered outdoor storage area for Public Works Utilities, Public Works Fleet & Facilities, and Parks & Recreation personnel; •One 92,300 SF four-story parking structure with 229 vehicle spaces. Within the first floor of the parking structure, 6,500 SF of enclosed conditioned space would be used for evidence storage by the Police Department. •One 4,050 SF stacked vehicle covered storage area used for vehicles impounded by the Police Department; and •One 640 SF carwash. The total proposed new building area described in the bullet list above would be 175,810 SF. The two- story office building would be located near the southwest corner of the project site at the intersection of Orion Street and Orion Way. The first story of the office building would consist of shared office space with a south-facing front entrance oriented toward visitor parking north of Orion Way. The first floor would contain a lobby, offices, conference rooms, locker rooms, break rooms, and restrooms. Two outdoor patio areas would be accessible from the break rooms on the north side of the building. The second floor would consist of office space. At the eastern end of the second floor, a pedestrian bridge would provide a walkway connection to the second story of the proposed parking structure. The project would introduce eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy hydromodification requirements. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 48 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -3-Initial Study The three warehouse/shop buildings would be located behind the two-story office building, with surface parking available between them. The building for the Public Works Utilities Division would be on the western end of the site. The building for the Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division would be centrally located. The building for the Parks & Recreation Department would be located between the Public Works Fleet & Facilities warehouse building and the four-level parking structure. The first story of the warehouse/shop buildings would contain warehousing area and storage rooms. The second floors of the Public Works Utilities and Public Works Fleet & Facilities buildings would each include a 2,400 SF mezzanine level. In addition to the new facilities described above, the project would make or consider the following improvements to existing facilities on-site: •Remodel an existing fleet maintenance building in the northwestern portion of the project site to raise the northeastern portion of the roof to match the building height of the remainder of the building, expand the building by a maximum of 530 SF, and make interior improvements. The remodel was approved administratively in 2018. Since it would be designed and constructed with the Orion Center, the remodel is being considered with it. However, the remodel of the fleet maintenance building and construction of the Orion Center are separate projects and are not dependent on one other. •Improve and repurpose an existing 20,000 SF materials storage yard within the eastern portion of the project site. •Add a shade canopy and replace existing fuel dispensers at the existing fueling station. While the visitor parking would be accessed through Orion Way, employee parking to the north of the office building would be accessed through a gated entrance off the intersection of Orion Street and Impala Drive. The project would extend sidewalks along the northern side of Orion Way in the vicinity of the project site. Consistent with city policies on environmental sustainability, the office building would be designed to achieve equivalence with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating level of silver or higher. Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels would be installed on the roof of the office building and the parking structure to support a goal of reaching a net-zero energy use facility. The existing western fleet yard would include an upgraded and reoriented vehicle washing and refueling station and uncovered and covered storage areas. The improved vehicle washing and refueling station would be at the same location as the existing station and would include a shade canopy and an improved containment system for runoff of chemicals used for vehicle cleaning. Proposed features that would be implemented within the existing eastern fleet yard include a 30-stall stacked parking structure, for impounded vehicles, an area for large vehicle parking, and the existing central equipment plant for standby generators, boilers, and cooling towers to support the facility. Whereas the western fleet yard would be primarily shared by the Public Works and Parks & Recreation Departments, most of the eastern fleet yard would support a large materials yard, employee parking for the entire project and a vehicle impound area for the city’s Police Department. The eastern fleet yard would be accessed through a gate from the visitor parking lot off Orion Way. Additionally, the project would include the following design features as conditions of approval to avoid environmental impacts. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 49 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -4-Initial Study •Air Quality: As demonstrated in the analysis below, project-generated construction and operational emissions would not exceed the SDAPCD screening thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Additionally, grading and construction emissions would be minimized through standard construction measures, SDAPCD rules and regulations, stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) requirements, and Best Management Practices (BMPs). •Energy: The project would be compliant with mandatory building and energy codes, which require water efficient landscaping and plumbing fixtures as well as efficient energy systems. Other energy efficiency measures are discussed with regards to Greenhouse Gas Emissions below. •Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The project would be compliant with the city’s Climate Action Plan ordinances by increasing energy efficiency, installing solar photovoltaic systems, providing electric vehicle parking, and preparing a transportation demand management plan. •Hydrology and Water Quality: The project would introduce eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy hydromodification requirements.. One key concern considered while developing site design is preservation of the open space habitat adjacent to the project site at its northern and eastern edges. Here, an existing chain link fence around the perimeter of the fleet yard parking lot separates the mostly asphalt-paved portion of the project site from unpaved portions of the project site north and east of the fence. Beyond the fence are two existing informal viewpoints and an existing access point into the adjacent open space (Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve). At the northernmost point of the fleet yard, an access gate in the fence opens to an approximately 30-foot stone stairway “trail” that leads up to a viewpoint area with a gravel surface surrounded by disturbed native vegetation. At the northern edge of this area is a wooden railing, beyond which is a steep slope that descends into the preserve. Approximately 180 feet east of this area, there is a second access gate from the existing fenced impound lot adjacent to the fleet yard that leads up an approximately 15-foot stone stairway to a second viewpoint area that also includes a wooden railing along the edge of the canyon slope. West of both of these stairways and viewpoints and leading from the western fleet yard is the existing, informal access point into the Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve. While the stairways and viewpoints would be preserved with the project, this informal access point would be discontinued. Project construction would last for approximately 18 months. Construction would begin in fall 2024 at the earliest. All aspects of the project, including the remodel of the existing fleet maintenance building, are anticipated to be constructed in a single phase. 10.ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING/SURROUNDING LAND USES: The project site is bounded by Orion Street to the west, Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve to the north and east, the Public Safety Center (Police Department and Fire Administrative Department) to the southeast, and the Safety Training Center to the south. The northwestern boundary of the project site includes the existing 10,520 SF vehicle fleet maintenance building at 2480 Impala Drive. Nearby uses include Catholic Charities La Posada Shelter for homeless men to the northwest, Palomar Transfer Station to the south, and industrial uses to the west. The project site is zoned Open Space (OS) and has a General Plan land use designation Public (P). The properties to the east and south are zoned Planned Industrial (P-M)/Industrial (M)/Open Space (OS) and have a General Plan land use designations of Planned Industrial (P-I) and Open Space (OS). The properties to the west are zoned Industrial (M) with a Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q) and have a General Plan land use Designation of Planned Industrial (P-I). The McClellan-Palomar Airport is 0.5 mile southwest of the project site. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 50 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -5-Initial Study 11.OTHER REQUIRED AGENCY APPROVALS (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): This Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is intended to serve as the primary environmental document for all actions associated with the project, including all discretionary approvals requested or required to implement the project. In addition, this is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the project. The actions and/or approvals that the city needs to consider for the project include but are not limited to the following: •Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission, in accordance with the findings, conditions, and development standards and special regulations contained in Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.42. •Subsequent approvals (which would require separate processing through the city) would include a grading permit, building permits, street improvement plans, and utility plans. As for permits from other agencies, the city has obtained a Part 77 determination from the Federal Aviation Administration that the project would pose no hazard to air navigation. Otherwise, no other permits or approvals from other agencies are required. 12.CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES CONSULTATION. a.Have California Native American Tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to public resources code section 21080.3.1? ☒Yes ☐No b.If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? ☒Yes ☐No 13.PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program environmental impact report (EIR), or other California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Division located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1.City of Carlsbad General Plan, City of Carlsbad Planning Division, September 2015. 2.Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan & Climate Action Plan (State Clearing House #2011011004), City of Carlsbad Planning Division, June 2015. 3.City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, as updated. 4.Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad, City of Carlsbad Planning Division, November 2004. 5.McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission. Amended December 2011. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 51 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -6-Initial Study 14.SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ☐Aesthetics ☐Greenhouse Gas Emissions ☐Public Services ☐Agriculture & Forestry Resources ☒ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ☐Recreation ☐Air Quality ☐Hydrology/Water Quality ☐Transportation ☒Biological Resources ☐Land Use & Planning ☒Tribal Cultural Resources ☐Cultural Resources ☐Mineral Resources ☐Utilities/Service Systems ☐Energy ☐Noise ☐Wildfire ☒Geology/Soils ☐Population & Housing ☒Mandatory Findings of Significance 15.PREPARATION: The Initial Study for the subject project was prepared by: January 18, 2023 Nick Larkin, RECON Environmental, Consultant Date April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 52 of 159 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 53 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) 16. DETERMINATION: (to be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: □ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. IZI I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described herein. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMP_ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significai:,t effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. 17. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The initial study for this project has been reviewed and the environmental determination; indicated above, is hereby approved. g y,C~ '{!,:/~) 18. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES: This is to certify that I have reviewed the mitigation measures in the Initial Study and concur with the addition of these measures to the proje~ t/(? / 'ZJ>Z--';, Signature Date Steven Stewart, Municipal Projects Manager January 2023 -7-Initial Study ., I FIGURE 1Regional Location kj USMC AIRSTATIONMIRAMAR CAMP PENDLETONMARINE COBASE Daley Ranch Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv Mission TrailsRegional Park ClevelandNationalForest Lake Wohlford Batiquitos Lagoon Lake Hodges San VicenteReservoir SweetwaterReservoir S a n t a Ysa b e l C r e e k Sweetw a t er River Escondido C r e e k S a n D i e g o Riv e r SanPasqualReservation Rincon Reservation BaronaReservation Camp Pendleton South Valley Center Bostonia Casa de Oro-MountHelix Fairbanks Ranch Granite Hills Hidden Meadows Jamul Lake San Marcos Lakeside La Presa RanchoSan Diego Rancho Santa Fe Spring Valley Winter Gardens UV163 UV78 UV54 UV56 UV76 UV75 UV125 UV67 UV94 UV52 §¨¦805 §¨¦8 §¨¦15 §¨¦5 S A ND I E G OC O U N T YCarlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista kj USMC AIRSTATIONMIRAMAR CAMP PENDLETONMARINE COBASE Daley Ranch Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv Mission TrailsRegional Park ClevelandNationalForest Lake Wohlford Batiquitos Lagoon Lake Hodges San VicenteReservoir SweetwaterReservoir S a n t a Ysa b e l C r e e k Sweetw a t er River Escondido C r e e k S a n D i e g o Riv e r SanPasqualReservation Rincon Reservation BaronaReservation Camp Pendleton South Valley Center Bostonia Casa de Oro-MountHelix Fairbanks Ranch Granite Hills Hidden Meadows Jamul Lake San Marcos Lakeside La Presa RanchoSan Diego Rancho Santa Fe Spring Valley Winter Gardens UV163 UV78 UV54 UV56 UV76 UV75 UV125 UV67 UV94 UV52 §¨¦805 §¨¦8 §¨¦15 §¨¦5 S A ND I E G OC O U N T YCarlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Beach Vista 0 5Miles [ M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig1.mxd 11/24/2021 bma LOS ANGELES ORANGE RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO SAN DIEGO MEXICO Project Locationkj April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 54 of 159 REC ()N FIGURE 2Project Location on USGS Map Map Source: USGS 7.5 minute topographic map series, San Luis Rey quadrangle, 1997, Agua Hedionda Land Grant 0 2,000Feet [ Project Boundary M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig2.mxd 11/24/2021 bma April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 55 of 159 - ~~~~====:s~~ ~~~~----'-1.:~----1.---L.i:.=~ =~-~=~~; Cl REC O N FIGURE 3Project Location on Aerial Photograph IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY Image Source: NearMap (flown September 2021) 0 150Feet [ Project Boundary M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig3_ismnd_2021.mxd 01/10/2022 bma April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 56 of 159 REC ()N • J.I · i!lj ---~• .. , .... --: .. M:\JOBS4\7663\env\graphics\fig4.afdesign 12/06/22 bma Source: RNT Architects FIGURE 4 Site Plan Ap r i l 5 , 2 0 2 3 It e m # 1 P a g e 5 7 o f 1 5 9 -- F=ROPrnrr UNr (TYP.) EXISTING 7' ·IIGH SECJRI TY FENCE IMPALA DRIVE ~ i OF STREET REC O N PROJECT SUMMARY ~ (TYP.) OPERATIONS OfflC:: BUILD NG: 41,900 GSF" ---(E) VIEV,, POINT UTILITIES WAREHOl.SE/SHCP, 9,870 GSf GnlERAL srn-.,cE WAPEHOUSE/SHOP, 9,870 GSf "\ L>.RGE REF"USE----~ BNS ----,---...!..---,,--'--:::..--5£.'re,._c,i:. u"t EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING ! -(oobuill) '"" ----"" ,.-., ~~ --~ --, I y : I:. s::::::::: -I I I I I PROPOSfO OUTOO<f' UN:OVEf~ ,,,- ..;._------:---~ ~ I~ ·~ ~~~ 4-(E) FUEL TANK ~ BELOW STOOAfE ~ ~· -- ·r PROPOSED OUTDOOR COVERED STORAGE 11,230 Sf ' J>: ,,,_,,,__A •u y t. ,. . I ,-7~7 ' I ". •::l'f'. PROPOSED ~ LEVEL PARKl'IIG STP.UCTJRE 229 SPACES 8 EV PARKING SP.\CE5 8 EV CAFABLE PARKING SPACES (E) -.,EW PONT W/G!TE ACCESS (E) EDGE OF SLCPE (TYP.) PARKS WAREHOUSE /SHOP· 5 950 CSE TO-AL, 67,590 GSf SHAOE STRUCTURES, COVERED OUTCOOR STORAGE, FUELJNG STATION CANOPY POLICE CO'/ERED STORAGE TO-AL, 4-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTIJRE 'MJH POI !CE STORAGE TO-AL 11,230 Sf 2,300 Sf ~ 17,58•) SF ~ 92,30•J SF PARKING G (TYP,) ~ UNDEVB..POEO STE ARE/I \ \ (E) SECURI-Y FENCE (T'iP,) "' ~ G ~'------',-LJl.tll OF WORK (Tl"P.) -........_ ~ ' ----- ----- STAFF PARKING OPERATIONAL VEHICLE STD. OPERATIONAL VEHICLE 0/S. POLICE VENDOR/GUEST TOTAL: ACCESSIBLE PARKI% VAN ACCESSIBLE PARE ING TOTAL EV PARKIN:; PARKING STRUCTURE SURFACE TOTAL, REQUIRED 172 91 23 125 12 423 REQUIRED 11 4 15 22 INSTI.LLE) 21 CAPABLE 43' PROVIDED 177 91 23 125 12 428 PROVIDED 11 4 15 22 22 16 28 44 ·PER CITY OF CARLSBAD ORDNANCE NO. cs 349 10% or SPACES ARE TO HAVE EV CHARGERS. ½ Of THE SPACES MAY BE CAFABLE FOR FUTURE EV CHARGERS LIGHTING ALL SECURHY LIGHTING WILL BE SPECIFIED TO SHELD DOWNWARD AND NOT SPILL INTO THE AD,ACENT -iABITAT PRESERVE. NOTE: PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAILS TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL RETAIN NG WALL AND ;nE CONDlllONS WHERE REQUIRED. "' -----~_,,, -----._ '---; I I I ,,,..---.... '- , I '/ /_,., "' 1/ ) I I \ 1 ·y"" I : r I ~ GENERAL I\OTES A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U 0.N B. SEE CIVIL DAftrt.WINGS FOR GRADING. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PtANS C SEE LAl'OSC6.PE DRAWINGS FOR P\.AN-ING ANO LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PLANS D BUS STOPS -.,EAREST BUS STOPS ARE ACROSS THE STA E.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS DUR NG CONSTRUCTION F CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING NATIVE TREES AND VEGETATION FROM DAMAGE DUf;ING COl'ISTRUCTION. G ALL PAVING AND FINISH GRACES SHAU. SLOPE A.WAY FROM BUILDINGS (\ KEY NOTES 0 BIOSWALE Pl.ANTER/ BASlt-1. SEE CIVIL CRAWINGS ~ CONC LOADING DOCK 0 RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL ORAWll'GS 0 OUTDOOR MEETING DECK 0 OPTIONA.. PARKIN3 SHADE CANOPIES W/ P,V.SOLAR PANELS~ CIP CONC MATERIAL ENCLOS~E WALLS 0 tE) STORAGE CONTAINERS AFTER RELOCATION ~ CIP CONC. STAIRS 0 CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE 8 (El CONTAINERS 0 SECURff"' GATE ~ RIDE/SHARE DROP OFF AREA 0 FUELING STATION CAf\OPY BY OTHERS E!) LONG-TERM 61KE LOCKER STORAGE 0 tE) FUELING STATI:)N 10 BE REPLACED BY OTHERS ~ ACCESSIBL.E RAMP 0 BACK-UP GENERATOR ~ BIKE/SCOOTER STORAGE & SEATING AREA ~ TRANSIT INFORMATION KIOSK ~ SENSITNE HABITAT ~ OUTDOOR EMPLOYEE. EATING AREA LEGEND I I / I (N) 6' HIGH SECURITY FENCE --------UMITOFWOAK PATt-OF TRAVEL TO t-EAREST BUS STOP ,~· i I/ ~ --1-1 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -12-Initial Study EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1.A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2.All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3.Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4."Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5.Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a.Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b.Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c.Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6.Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7.Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 58 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -13-Initial Study 8.The explanation of each issue should identify: a.The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b.The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 9.Tribal consultation, if requested as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, must begin prior to release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report for a project. Information provided through tribal consultation may inform the lead agency’s assessment as to whether tribal cultural resources are present, and the significance of any potential impacts to such resources. Prior to beginning consultation, lead agencies may request information from the Native American Heritage Commission regarding its Sacred Lands File, per Public Resources Code sections 5097.9 and 5097.94, as well as the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 59 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -14-Initial Study I.AESTHETICS Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Les s t han S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?☐☐☐☒ b)Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?☐☐☒☐ c)In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? ☐☐☒☐ d)Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?☐☐☒☐ a)No Impact The Land Use & Community Design Element establishes that oceans and beaches are considered scenic assets that provide opportunities for scenic vistas from nearby streets and buildings. Additionally, views of the City of Carlsbad’s (city’s) three lagoons would also be considered scenic vistas and views of open space and hillsides contribute to the city’s natural scenic character. The project site does not have any views of the ocean, beaches or three lagoons. Therefore, the project would not have the potential to affect scenic vistas associated with these aesthetic resources. The project site is located in the city’s Public Safety and Public Works complex area, and would propose a two-story office building, three warehouse/shop buildings, an outdoor covered storage area, and a four- story parking structure. This is consistent with the adjacent uses such as the Safety Training Center to the south and the Safety Center to the southeast. The proposed building elevations would not exceed those of the surrounding development. The city developed Scenic Corridor Guidelines which sought to designate streets within the city as scenic corridors and identify ways to preserve and enhance the character of those streets. One goal of the guidelines is to preserve and enhance the quality of views along the route. Faraday Avenue is the street identified in the Scenic Corridor Guidelines closest to the project site (City of Carlsbad 1988). However, the project is located 0.1mile north of Faraday Avenue and would not affect the scenic quality of the roadway. Similarly, views towards the project site from Faraday Avenue are limited to the area adjacent to the roadways due to topography, intervening structures, and vegetation. The project site is visible from the local roadways and sidewalks, including Orion Street and Impala Drive to the west and Orion Way to the south. Views are generally limited to the area adjacent to the roadways due to topography, intervening structures, and vegetation and there are no designated scenic vistas in the project vicinity. Views of the project site from surrounding developed or developable properties to the north and east are also limited due to topography, distance, intervening structures, and vegetation. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 60 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -15-Initial Study Much of the scenery and views to the east and north from the project site are dominated by natural, preserved open space associated with the Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve, other preserves, as well as extensive agriculture. However, views from the project site are obstructed by the existing chain link fence, topography, and vegetation and tend to be toward distant hillsides. Furthermore, developed or developable surrounding properties to the north and east and Faraday Avenue are several hundred feet or more from the project site and proposed improvements would appear as a continuation of existing ridgeline development. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. No impact would occur. b)Less than Significant Impact See response to I(a) above. The project site is not located within a designated scenic corridor. No unique scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or historic buildings are present on-site or in proximity to the project site. There are no state-designated scenic highways near the project site. Although landscaping trees would be removed during construction, there are no city-designated heritage trees or otherwise locally important trees on the site. Existing vegetation on the site consists of ornamental trees on islands scattered through parking areas and is not considered a scenic resource. In addition, this impact (removal of vegetation) would be temporary as a landscape plan is included as part of the project that would provide enhanced landscaping with the new buildings and facilities. Therefore, the project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including within a state scenic highway, and no impact would occur. c)Less than Significant Impact The Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.40, establishes a Scenic Preservation Overlay Zone, which applies to all properties with frontage along El Camino Real. To implement the overlay zone, the city adopted the El Camino Real Corridor Development Standards (February 1984). These guidelines address the El Camino Real corridor and the development that directly fronts El Camino Real, which the project site does not. The intent is to provide an easily identifiable homogenous corridor, with a single design concept that motorists would recognize from any point along the route. The project site, which is more than one-third mile east of the El Camino Real corridor, currently includes a fleet maintenance building, vehicle washing and fueling station, and parking areas. Current features have limited visual character. The project proposes to develop a new facility, which would include a two- story office building, three warehouse/shop buildings, an outdoor covered storage area, and a four-story parking structure. The visual character of the proposed facility would include landscaping and architectural features that are consistent with the adjacent Safety Center and Safety Training Center. Therefore, the project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, and impacts would be less than significant. d)Less than Significant Impact The existing fleet maintenance facility includes light poles throughout the parking areas. Adjacent facilities such as the Safety Center and the Safety Training Center also have light poles throughout exterior parking areas and adjacent streets such as Orion Street, Orion Way, and Impala Drive have light poles at regular intervals. The proposed facility would include light sources associated with the office building, warehouse/shop buildings, and parking structure and would incorporate light poles throughout the fleet yards for safety and security purposes. The lighting would be directed to on-site facilities and ground areas adjacent to structures; therefore, no direct light would spill into the adjacent open space. The project shall be designed utilizing elements to reduce glare and window bird strikes by incorporating anti-glare window April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 61 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -16-Initial Study films or fritted glass at all glazed openings where strikes are possible. Therefore, the project would not create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and impacts would be less than significant. II.AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES* Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n Inc o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ☐☐☐☒ b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?☐☐☐☒ c)Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), or timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? ☐☐☐☒ d)Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?☐☐☐☒ e)Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? ☐☐☐☒ *In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 (LESA) prepared by the California Department ofConservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. There are no lands present inCarlsbad that meet the state’s definition of forest land (Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (Public Resources Code section 4526), or production (Government Code 51104(g)). Therefore, questions related to forestry resources will haveno impacts. a)No Impact The Department of Conservation “California Important Farmland Finder” classifies the project site as Urban and Built-Up land pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (State of California Department of Conservation 2016). The project site does not contain any agricultural operations and has no recent history of agricultural production. Therefore, the project would not result in the conversion of agricultural land or any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. b)No Impact The project site is designated as Public (P) under the General Plan and is zoned Open Space (OS). The project site is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 62 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -17-Initial Study c)No Impact The project site is zoned Open Space (OS) and has a General Plan land use designation Public (P) and is currently developed with an urban use. All trees on-site consist of ornamental landscaping. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined by Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), or timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)) as no such lands exist on the project site or in the project area. No impact would occur. d)No Impact Carlsbad is devoid of any lands that meet the definition of forest land, timberland, or timberland production zone. Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur. e)No Impact The project site currently includes a vehicle washing and fueling station, fleet maintenance building, and parking areas. There are no agricultural uses or forestlands on-site or in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the project would not result in conversion of farmland or forest land. No impact would occur. III.AIR QUALITY* Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t I m p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s tha n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?☐☐☒☐ b)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?☐☐☒☐ c)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?☐☐☒☐ d)Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?☐☐☒☐ *Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the determinations in this section. Local Air Quality: An area is designated in attainment when it is in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (federal) and/or California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (state). These standards are set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) or the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for the maximum level of a given air pollutant that can exist in the outdoor air without unacceptable effects on human health or the public welfare. The criteria pollutants of primary concern that are considered in an air quality assessment include ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), lead and toxic air contaminants. Although there are no ambient standards for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or NOX, they are important as precursors to O3. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 63 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -18-Initial Study The San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) is designated as a marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour NAAQS for O3. The SDAB is designated in attainment for all other criteria pollutants under the NAAQS with the exception of PM10, which was determined to be unclassified. The SDAB is currently designated nonattainment for O3 and particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5, under the CAAQS. It is designated as attainment for CAAQS for CO, NO2, SO2, lead, and sulfates. a)Less than Significant Impact Project consistency is based on whether the project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Regional Air Quality Standards (RAQS) and/or applicable portions of the State Implementation Plan (SIP), which would lead to increases in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations. The RAQS is the applicable regional air quality plan that sets forth the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District’s (SDAPCD’s) strategies for achieving the NAAQS and CAAQS. The San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) is designated a non-attainment area for the federal and state ozone standard. Accordingly, the RAQS was developed to identify feasible emission control measures and provide expeditious progress toward attaining the standards for ozone. The two pollutants addressed in the RAQS are reactive organic gases (ROG) and NOX, which are precursors to the formation of ozone. Projected increases in motor vehicle usage, population, and growth create challenges in controlling emissions and, by extension, to maintaining and improving air quality. The RAQS was most recently updated in 2016. The growth projections used by the SDAPCD to develop the RAQS emissions budgets are based on the population, vehicle trends, and land use plans developed in general plans and used by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in the development of the regional transportation plans and sustainable communities strategy. As such, projects that propose development that is consistent with the growth anticipated by SANDAG’s growth projections and/or the General Plan would not conflict with the RAQS. In the event that a project would propose development that is less dense than anticipated by the growth projections, the project would likewise be consistent with the RAQS. In the event a project proposes development that is greater than anticipated in the growth projections, further analysis would be warranted to determine if the project would exceed the growth projections used in the RAQS for the specific subregional area. The project would be consistent with the Public general plan land use designation. The project site is zoned Open Space, but the proposed land use is allowed by the Zoning Code with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the project is within the scope of development that was anticipated in the SANDAG growth projections and Carlsbad’s General Plan in 2016 used to develop the RAQS and SIP. Furthermore, as described in Section III.b) below, the project would not result in construction or operational emissions in excess of the applicable significance thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Consequently, the project would not result in an increase in emissions that are not already accounted for in the RAQS. Therefore, the project would not obstruct or conflict with implementation of the RAQS and SIP, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact RECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON) prepared an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Letter Report for the project (Appendix A; RECON 2022a). In the letter report, construction and operation emissions associated with the project are estimated using the California Emissions Estimator model (CalEEMod) software version 2020.0.0 and compared to SDAPCD screening thresholds. Modeling results are summarized in Table 1 below. For a full discussion of methodology and assumptions, see Appendix A. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 64 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -19-Initial Study As shown in Table 1, project generated construction and operational emissions would not exceed the SDAPCD screening thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Additionally, grading and construction emissions would be minimized through standard construction measures, SDAPCD rules and regulations, stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) requirements, and Best Management Practices (BMPs). Cumulative air quality impacts are basin-wide, and air quality is affected by all pollutant sources in the basin. As the individual project thresholds are designed to help achieve attainment with cumulative basin-wide standards, they are also appropriate for assessing the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. As shown in Table 1, emissions would be less than the applicable screening thresholds. As emissions would be less than the screening thresholds, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant. Table 1 Maximum Daily Construction and Operational Emissions (pounds/day) Pollutant Project Emissions Screening Threshold1 Exceeds Threshold? Construction Emissions Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) 33 250 No Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)2 21 250 No Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10) 22 100 No Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 12 67 No Oxides of Sulfur (SOX) <1 250 No Carbon Monoxide (CO) 23 550 No Operational Emissions3 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) 2 250 No Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)2 5 250 No Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10) 3 100 No Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 1 67 No Oxides of Sulfur (SOX) <1 250 No Carbon Monoxide (CO) 17 550 No SOURCE: Appendix A 1 SDAPCD Rules 20.1, 20.2, and 20.3 do not specify a threshold for reactive organic gases (ROG). The threshold for ROG is based on the U.S. EPA General Conformity Rule, which equates ROG and NOX emissions under the Clean Air Act and applies the same limitation on ROG and NOX emissions in ozone non-attainment areas. 2 CalEEMod estimates emission of reactive organic gases (ROG). ROG and VOC have substantially similar definitions; for purposes of this analysis, ROG and VOC are equivalent and only VOC is reported here. 3 Average daily operations emissions vary by season. Worst-case emissions are shown. As shown in Table 1 above, project construction and operational emissions would not exceed the established significance thresholds. As such, the project would not generate emissions in quantities that would result in an exceedance of the NAAQS or CAAQS for ozone, PM10, or PM2.5. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in any criteria pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment, and impacts would be less than significant. c)Less than Significant Impact The term sensitive receptor may refer to a land use at which a person that is subject to respiratory stress and/or other increased risk of health impact as a result of air pollutant exposure. Typical sensitive April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 65 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -20-Initial Study receptors include residences, schools, hospitals, hotels, and outdoor recreation areas such as athletic fields. The project site and surrounding areas are zoned either Open Space (OS) or Industrial (M) and have land use designations of Open Space (OS), Public (P) or Planned Industrial (PI). Normally, sensitive receptors would not be located within these zoning or land use designations. The Catholic Charities La Posada de Guadalupe de Carlsbad Shelter for homeless men is located immediately west of the project site and is considered to be a sensitive receptor. The shelter provides short-term housing and case management for up to 50 homeless men and long-term housing for employed farm workers in North County. As discussed in Section III(b), total project emissions would not exceed air quality impact analysis (AQIA) trigger levels (i.e., the screening thresholds identified in Table 1) for new or modified stationary sources (SDAPCD Rules 20.2 and 20.3). Thus, on-site emissions also would not exceed AQIA trigger levels and the project would not generate criteria pollutant concentrations that may impact proximate sensitive receptors. Furthermore, fugitive dust emission (PM10) would be temporary and would not generate an ongoing, substantial source of emissions that could adversely affect surrounding sensitive receptors, as the project would be required to comply with SDAPCD rules and regulations. Because construction would result in short-term exposure (18 months), construction emissions of diesel PM would result in less than significant cancer risks. In its Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, CARB recommends maintaining land use buffer zones between sensitive receptors and facilities that emit substantial quantities of diesel PM such as distribution centers, rail yards, refineries, and ports (CARB 2005). As distribution centers vary in size, CARB clarifies that its recommendations only apply to facilities that accommodate more than 100 heavy-duty trucks per day or 40 refrigerated heavy-duty trucks per day. Thus, facilities with fewer than 100 heavy-duty truck trips per day or 40 refrigerated heavy-duty truck trips per day would not generate quantities of diesel PM that warrant land use buffer zones or further analysis. The project proposes a maintenance and operations facility for the city’s Public Works Utilities Division, Parks & Recreation Department, and Public Works Fleet & Facilities Division. The vehicle fleet would primarily consist of cars and light-duty trucks, but may also include heavy-duty trucks. These trucks would not be anticipated to include refrigeration units. The project would not be anticipated to generate greater than 100 heavy-duty truck trips per day or 40 refrigerated heavy-duty truck trips per day. Consequently, the project would not generate diesel PM concentrations that my impact proximate sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and impacts would be less than significant. d)Less than Significant Impact Project construction may generate objectional odors associated with diesel equipment and paving activities. Operation of the project may generate objectional odors associated with vehicles and/or equipment exhaust from volatile organic compounds, ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, methane, alcohols, disulfides, dusts or other pollutants. Such exposure would be in trace amounts, localized in the immediate area, temporary, and would generally occur at magnitudes that would not affect substantial numbers of people. Therefore, the project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 66 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -21-Initial Study RECON prepared a Biological Resources Report for the project (Appendix B; RECON 2022b). a)Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types: The following six vegetation communities and land cover types were identified in the approximate 14.22-acre survey area: Diegan coastal sage scrub (Group C or D habitat depending on gnatcatcher occupancy), disturbed coastal sage scrub (Group D habitat; due to the disturbed nature of this habitat it would not be considered suitable gnatcatcher habitat), southern mixed chaparral (Group D habitat), eucalyptus woodland (Group F habitat), disturbed land (Group F habitat), and urban/developed land. The locations of these vegetation communities and land cover types are presented in Figure 5 and their acreages are presented in Table 2. IV.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐☒☐☐ b)Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐☐☐☒ c)Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, orother means? ☐☐☐☒ d)Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ☐☐☐☒ e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?☐☐☐☒ f)Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ☐☐☐☒ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 67 of 159 FIGURE 5Existing Biological Resources and Impacts !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( IMPALA DR OR I O N S T ORIONWAY !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( IMPALA DR OR I O N S T ORIONWAY Image Source: NearMap (flown September 2021) 0 150Feet [ M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig5_bioltr.mxd 11/24/2021 bma Project Impact Boundary Survey Area !(California Adolphia Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types Southern Mixed Chaparral Diegan Coastal Sage ScrubDisturbed Coastal Sage Scrub Disturbed Land Eucalyptus WoodlandUrban/Developed April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 68 of 159 Cl D 1?221 REC O N - Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -23-Initial Study Table 2 Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types within the Survey Area Community or Type (Holland Code as modified by Oberbauer) City of Carlsbad Groupa Acres Diegan coastal sage scrub (32500) C or Db 1.61 Disturbed coastal sage scrub (32500) D 0.03 Southern mixed chaparral (37120) D 0.75 Eucalyptus woodland (79100) F 1.02 Disturbed land (11300) F 0.65 Urban/developed land (12000) N/A 10.15 Total 14.22c aGroup (type of habitat) taken from Table 11 in the City of Carlsbad HMP. bHabitat Group C or D, depending on gnatcatcher occupancy. cRounding error represented. N/A = not applicable Table 3 presents the acreage of impacts that would occur to vegetation communities and land cover types within the project site. The project would impact a total of 8.53 acres of vegetation communities/land cover types. All impacts would occur within the “Project Impact Boundary” shown on Figure 5. Therefore, there would be no impacts outside of this boundary, and all impacts would be considered permanent. This would include impacts to eucalyptus woodland, disturbed land, and urban/developed land. The locations of these impacts are presented in Figure 5. No impacts to Diegan coastal sage scrub, disturbed coastal sage scrub, or southern mixed chaparral would occur. Impacts to urban/developed land, eucalyptus woodland, and disturbed land would not be considered significant and would not require mitigation. Eucalyptus woodland and disturbed land are Group F non-sensitive habitats. No mitigation is required by the city for city project impacts to Group F habitats. Table 3 Impacts to Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types within the Project Community or Type (Holland Code as modified by Oberbauer) Permanent Direct Impacts (acres) Diegan coastal sage scrub (32500) 0.0 Disturbed coastal sage scrub (32500) 0.0 Southern mixed chaparral (37120) 0.0 Eucalyptus woodland (79100) 0.39 Disturbed land (11300) 0.29 Urban/developed land (12000) 7.85 Total 8.53 Sensitive Plant Species: A total of 68 plant species were identified on-site. Of this total, 42 (62 percent) are species native to southern California, and 26 (38 percent) are introduced species. One sensitive plant species, California adolphia (Adolphia californica), was observed within the survey area, outside of and just north of the project site boundary (see Figure 5). Two small patches of California adolphia were mapped within the survey area. One patch totaling approximately 50 individuals was observed beyond the chain link fence outside the northeastern portion of the project site within the Diegan coastal sage scrub (see Figure 5). Additionally, approximately nine individuals were observed beyond the chain link fence outside the northern portion of the project site, within Diegan coastal sage scrub and eucalyptus April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 69 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -24-Initial Study woodland (see Figure 5). No California adolphia individuals occur within the project site itself, as there is no suitable habitat and the plant would have been apparent at the time of the survey, given the conspicuous form and size of the species. No additional sensitive plant species were observed or are expected to occur within the immediate project site. Therefore, the project would not impact any sensitive plant species. Sensitive Wildlife Species: The project would have the potential to impact sensitive avian species and nesting avian species covered under California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) 3503 and 3503.5. No impacts are anticipated to occur to sensitive reptile or mammal species. Potential impacts to these species are described below. Sensitive Reptile Species Belding’s orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra beldingi) has a low potential to occur within the disturbed habitat connected to the canyon within the project site. The project would have the potential to result in direct impacts to this species through incidental mortality during grading and removal of Diegan coastal sage scrub and disturbed coastal sage scrub. However, this marginally suitable habitat presents a small fraction of the habitat available for this species. Additionally, this species is anticipated to disperse to avoid potential direct impacts. No other sensitive reptile species have the potential to occur within the proposed impact area. Therefore, the project would not impact any sensitive reptile species. Sensitive Bird Species The project may result in direct or indirect impacts to sensitive bird species or to bird species covered by the CFGC 3505 and 3503.5 that have moderate to high potential to occur within and/or adjacent to the proposed impact area. Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) has potential to forage and nest within the Diegan coastal sage scrub directly adjacent to the proposed impact area. Thus, increased construction noise levels during the coastal California gnatcatcher’s nesting season (February 15 through August 15) could result in indirect impacts to nesting coastal California gnatcatcher. Impacts to this species that adversely affect nesting success would be considered significant. Implementation of mitigation measure BIO-1 would reduce impacts on coastal California gnatcatcher to a level less than significant. BIO-1: Mitigation for Impacts to Coastal California Gnatcatcher The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as construction occur during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season (February 15 through August 15) within 500 feet of potential coastal California gnatcatcher breeding habitat (i.e., coastal sage scrub): •A qualified biologist will conduct a single pre-construction survey in appropriate habitat within 500 feet of project activities no more than 3 days before the start of construction. If coastal California gnatcatcher is not identified, then no further species-specific mitigation would be required. If coastal California gnatcatcher is identified during the survey, the following additional mitigation measures would be required during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season: April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 70 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -25-Initial Study •The city will be notified immediately if coastal California gnatcatcher or other listed species is located during the pre-construction survey. •Fencing or other measures will be installed within a buffer of at least 500 feet from active nests. No work would be conducted within the buffer until the nest is no longer active or noise attenuation measures can be implemented to ensure that construction noise would not impact nesting success (see following measure). •During the breeding season, construction noise will be measured regularly to maintain a threshold at or below 60 A-weighted decibels hourly average noise level [dB(A) Leq] within 500 feet of breeding habitat occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher. If noise levels supersede the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented (City of Carlsbad 2008). Raptors and Nesting Birds Raptors, including Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), have the potential to nest in the eucalyptus woodland of the proposed impact area. If raptor nests are identified in any trees within the project site, any trimming or cutting of these trees during the nesting season (February 1 to August 15) would be considered a direct impact. Additionally, increased noise levels due to construction could result in indirect impacts to nesting raptors. Impacts to this species that adversely affect nesting success would be considered significant. Implementation of mitigation measure BIO-2 would reduce impacts on raptors to a level less than significant. Nesting bird species, including southern California rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila ruficeps canescens), covered under the CFGC 3503 and 3503.5 and the Habitat Management Plan (HMP) have potential to be impacted by the project if construction occurs within the general bird breeding season (February 15 to August 31). The eucalyptus trees within the project site provide suitable raptor nesting habitat. Direct impacts to nesting birds would be considered significant. Implementation of mitigation measure BIO-2 would reduce impacts on nesting birds to a level less than significant. BIO-2: Mitigation for Impacts to Raptors and Nesting Birds The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as vegetation removal or grading occur during the general bird breeding season (February 15 through August 31), which includes Cooper’s hawk and southern California rufous-crowned sparrow: •A qualified biologist will conduct a survey for active nests within appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and birds in the project site as well as an additional 500-foot survey buffer within three days of vegetation removal or construction. •If nests of federally or state listed birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are located, a protective buffer will be established around the nest by a qualified biologist. Buffer width for raptors and listed species will be 500 feet. Buffer width for other nesting species will be determined by a qualified biologist on a case-by-case basis. All construction activity will be prohibited within this area until the young have successfully fledged and the nest is no longer active. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 71 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -26-Initial Study b)No Impact The project site does not include any riparian habitat, aquatic or wetland habitat, or other sensitive natural communities. No impact would occur. c)No Impact The project site does not include wetlands and is not proximate to any wetlands. No impact would occur. d)No Impact Wildlife movement corridors are defined as areas that connect suitable wildlife habitat areas in a region otherwise fragmented by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. Natural features such as canyon drainages, ridgelines, or areas with vegetation cover provide corridors for wildlife travel. Wildlife movement corridors are important because they provide access to mates, food, and water; allow the dispersal of individuals away from high population density areas; and facilitate the exchange of genetic traits between populations (Beier and Loe 1992). Designated wildlife movement corridors are considered sensitive by resource and conservation agencies. The project site is situated on the mesa above Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve, which includes Agua Hedionda Creek. The creek and canyon provide a movement corridor for large wildlife; however, the project site occurs on the edge of the canyon within a fenced, previously developed property. The project site would not serve as a movement corridor for large wildlife due to the existing tall chain link fence that separates the project site from the Preserve. Additionally, the project site does not contain potential wildlife nursery sites and does not include a stream, river, or water body. Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve is located to the north and east of the project site. Features of this preserve include Agua Hedionda Creek. Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve is connected to an urban canyon system to the northeast and northwest of the project site. The project site is located within a previously developed property adjacent to Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve. There would be no project impacts within the adjacent habitat, and the developed area would remain fenced off from the habitat. Therefore, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. No impact would occur. e)No Impact Trees located on the project site are not designated as heritage trees by the city’s Heritage Tree Program or the Community Forest Management Plan. Additionally, the project would not impact the adjacent preserve. Therefore, removal of trees on the project site would not conflict with tree preservation policies or the HMP. No impact would occur. f)No Impact The project site is located within the boundaries of the final Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP), which is a multi-jurisdictional habitat conservation plan that was prepared for seven north San Diego County jurisdictions: Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, San Marcos, Vista, Solana Beach, and Escondido (SANDAG 2003). More specifically, the project site falls within the city’s MHCP Subarea Plan, which is the city’s HMP (City of Carlsbad 2004). The HMP designates a natural habitat preserve system and provides a regulatory framework for determining impacts and designating mitigation associated with projects in the city. The Mandana Preserve (a proposed Hardline Preserve) occurs 400 feet northwest of the project boundary (Figure 6). The Draft North County Multiple Species Conservation Plan (MSCP) Preserve Area April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 72 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -27-Initial Study occurs beyond the northern and eastern project boundary and is associated with Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve (see Figure 6). The city HMP has established a preserve system to provide adequate conservation for listed and covered species. The preserve system includes existing hardline preserve areas (existing dedicated open space), proposed hardline preserve areas (proposed open space), and proposed standard areas (planned open space). These open space areas, combined with addition of other lands (e.g., disturbed lands) into the preserve system, would result in conservation of approximately 6,400 acres, or 74 percent of the remaining habitat within the city. Disturbed lands and other lands provide opportunities for the city to grow the preserve lands. Development within an existing or proposed Hardline Preserve is mostly prohibited (City of Carlsbad 2004). The Mandana Preserve (a proposed Hardline Preserve) occurs 400 feet northwest of the project site (see Figure 6). Additionally, the Draft North County MSCP Preserve Area occurs just outside of the northern and eastern project boundary (see Figure 6). The proposed impact area would not extend beyond the existing chain link fence that separates the currently developed area from the North County MSCP Preserve Area. Consequently, the project would not impact the North County MSCP Preserve Area or HMP future Hardline Preserve. Additionally, the project would remain in compliance with the HMP adjacency standards to fire management; erosion control; landscaping restrictions; fencing, signs, and lighting; and predator and exotic species control. As the project is proposed on previously developed land and no new development is planned beyond the existing chain link fence, the project would not be subject to any new brush management requirements. Construction would comply with best management practices to prevent erosion offsite and ensure that no new surface drainage is directed into the preserve. The proposed landscape plan does not include the introduction of non-native, invasive plant species from container stock or hydroseeded material adjacent to the preserve. No irrigation is proposed adjacent to the preserve. No native plant landscaping cultivars of coastal sage scrub and chaparral species would be taken from central or northern California locations, or from islands off the coast of southern California to avoid genetic contamination of native plant species. Existing chain link fencing that separates the project from the preserve would remain intact restricting access into the preserve. All proposed lighting adjacent to the preserve would be focused downward and shielded. No exotic species or non-native predators would be introduced. Therefore, the project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. No impact would occur. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 73 of 159 FIGURE 6 Project in Relation to City of Carlsbad HMP and Draft North County MSCP ORIO N S T IMPALADR ORION WAY ORIO N S T IMPALADR ORION WAY Image Source: NearMap (flown September 2021) 0 200Feet [ Project Boundary Survey Area City of Carlsbad HMP Mandana Preserve (Future Hardline) North County Draft MSCP Preserve Area M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig6_ismnd.mxd 12/3/2021 fmm OPERATIONS OFFICE BUILDING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 74 of 159 c::::J D REC O N 833 1111 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -29-Initial Study V.CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?☐☐☐☒ b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?☐☐☒☐ c)Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?☐☐☒☐ RECON prepared a letter report evaluating potential impacts associated with cultural resources for the project (Appendix C; RECON 2022c). The analysis included a review of records in the California Historical Resources Information System and South Coastal Information Center for the project’s area of potential effect (APE), which consists of the project site and a surrounding one-mile buffer. Additionally, RECON sent a letter to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento requesting they search their files to identify spiritually significant and/or sacred sites or traditional use areas in the project vicinity and to provide a list of local Native American tribes, bands, or individuals who may have concerns or interests in the cultural resources of the project. In its response on June 20, 2016, the NAHC indicated that there are no traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the project site. a)No Impact The project site currently consists of a vehicle washing and fueling station, fleet maintenance building, and parking areas. Existing features were developed over the past 40 years and do not have distinctive architectural characteristics that would qualify as historic resources. The records search completed for the project indicated that there have been 80 archaeological investigations conducted and 55 cultural resources discovered within a one-mile radius of the project’s APE. The cultural resources consisted of five bedrock milling sites with no artifacts; two bedrock milling sites with lithic scatters; two ceramic and lithic scatters; two ceramic, lithic, and shell scatters; two ground stone scatters; five lithic and ceramic scatters; nine lithic scatters, eleven lithic and shell scatters; seven shell scatters; four temporary camps; one roasting pit site; two prehistoric isolated artifacts; seven historic building/structures; and one multicomponent site with historic foundations and shell scatter. None of the 55 previously recorded sites were located within the APE. Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5. No impact would occur. b)Less than Significant Impact As described in Section V.a) above, none of the 55 previously recorded sites were located within the APE. One site (CA-SDI-5224) is recorded immediately adjacent to the APE. CA-SDI-5224 was recorded in 1977 as a shell scatter with a few lithic artifacts. Two buildings are currently located within the boundary of this site. An excavation program was completed at CA-SDI-5224 for the city’s Public Safety Center in 1983. A series of postholes and 1x1-meter units were excavated. Based on the recovery, the site was determined to be not significant. Additionally, the NAHC indicated that there are no traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the project site. Furthermore, review of historic aerial photographs determined that the project site had been graded and disturbed in the past, beginning in 1980. Therefore, April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 75 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -30-Initial Study the likelihood of encountering significant cultural resources during construction is considered low, and impacts would be less than significant. c)Less than Significant Impact There are no dedicated cemeteries or recorded burials within the project site or surrounding vicinity. Additionally, the NAHC indicated that there are no traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the project site. Due to previous grading and disturbance, it is unlikely that human remains would be encountered during project grading and construction. In the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during project grading and construction, they would be handled in accordance with procedures of the Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, the California Government Code Section 27491, and the Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. Therefore, the project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries, and impacts would be less than significant. VI.ENERGY Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t I m p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?☐☐☒☐ b)Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energyor energy efficiency?☐☐☒☐ a)Less than Significant Impact Energy use associated with a project typically includes fuel (gasoline and diesel), electricity, and natural gas, and sources include the following: •Construction-related vehicle and equipment energy use •Transportation energy use from people traveling to and from the project area during operation •Building and facility energy use of the project during operation Construction-Related Energy Use Energy use during construction would occur within two general categories: fuel use from vehicles used by workers commuting to and from the construction site, and fuel use by vehicles and other equipment to conduct construction activities. Project construction is anticipated to last 18 months. The project would not require mass grading or other large earth-moving activities that could consume substantial amounts of fuel or other forms of energy. Based on CalEEMod calculations, project construction would require a maximum of 135 worker vehicle trips per day and 54 vendor trips per day during building construction activities. All other construction activities would require fewer worker and vendor vehicle trips. Fuel consumption associated with construction worker commute would be similar of any other typical commute in San Diego County, and would not result in a wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of gasoline or diesel fuel. Consistent with state requirements, all construction equipment would meet April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 76 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -31-Initial Study CARB Tier 3 In-Use Off-Road Diesel Engine Standards. Engines are required to meet certain emission standards, and groups of standards are referred to as Tiers. A Tier 0 engine is unregulated with no emission controls, and each progression of standard level (i.e., Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, etc.) generate lower emissions, use less energy, and are more advanced technologically than the previous tier. CARB’s Tier 3 In-Use Off- Road Diesel Engine Standards requires that construction equipment fleets become cleaner and use less energy over time. There are no known conditions in the project area that would require nonstandard equipment or construction practices that would increase fuel-energy consumption above typical equipment fuel consumption rates. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary and short term (18 months) and would adhere to all construction BMPs. Therefore, project construction would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, and impacts would be less than significant. Operation-Related Energy Use During operation, energy use would be associated with transportation-related fuel use (gasoline, diesel fuel, and electric vehicles), and building-related energy use (electricity and natural gas). Transportation-Related Energy Use Buildout of the project and vehicle trips associated with the project would result in transportation energy use. Trips by individuals traveling to and from the project site would result from use of passenger vehicles and work trucks. Vehicles would be mostly powered by gasoline, with some fueled by diesel or electricity. The project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would only redistribute existing trips without adding any new trips to the roadway network. Based on the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis prepared for the project, the total employee-generated VMT under the project would be 72 miles less compared to commutes from the four existing locations (see Table 5). Additionally, the project would further reduce regional VMT compared to the existing condition because the consolidated site would improve the efficiency of operations by reducing/eliminating other types of trips currently occurring between the four existing facilities. Additionally, the project would provide electric vehicle (EV) parking spaces. Project fuel consumption would decline over time beyond initial operational year of the project as a result of continued implementation of increased federal and state vehicle efficiency standards. There is no component of the project that would result in unusually high vehicle fuel use during operation. Therefore, operation of the project would not create a land use pattern that would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of transportation-related energy, and impacts would be less than significant. Non-Transportation-Related Energy Use Non-transportation energy use would be associated with electricity and natural gas. The Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) promotes diversification of the state’s electricity supply and decreased reliance on fossil fuel energy sources. Renewable energy includes (but is not limited to) wind, solar, geothermal, small hydroelectric, biomass, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas. Originally adopted in 2002 with a goal to achieve a 20 percent renewable energy mix by 2020 (referred to as the “Initial RPS”), the goal has been accelerated and increased by EOs S-14-08 and S-21-09 to a goal of 33 percent by 2020. In April 2011, Senate Bill (SB) 2 (1X) codified California’s 33 percent RPS goal. SB 350 (2015) increased California’s renewable energy mix goal to 50 percent by year 2030. SB 100 (2018) further increased the standard set April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 77 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -32-Initial Study by SB 350 establishing the RPS goal of 44 percent by the end of 2024, 52 percent by the end of 2027, and 60 percent by 2030. The project site is served by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). Based on the most recent annual report, SDG&E has already procured 39 percent (California Public Utilities Commission 2021) renewable energy and is on track to procure 60 percent by 2030 as outlined in SDG&E’s 2019 RPS Procurement Plan (SDG&E 2020). The California Code of Regulations, Title 24, is referred to as the California Building Code (CBC). It consists of a compilation of several distinct standards and codes related to building construction, including plumbing, electrical, interior acoustics, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and so on. Of particular relevance to greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions are the CBC’s energy efficiency and green building standards as outlined below. Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations is the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). Beginning in 2011, CALGreen instituted mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up new construction of commercial and low-rise residential buildings, state- owned buildings, schools, and hospitals. It also includes voluntary tiers (I and II) with stricter environmental performance standards for these same categories of residential and non-residential buildings. Local jurisdictions must enforce the minimum mandatory requirements and may adopt CALGreen with amendments for stricter requirements. The project would, at a minimum, be required to comply with the mandatory measures included in the current 2019 Energy Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) and the 2019 CALGreen standards. The mandatory standards require the following: •outdoor water use requirements as outlined in local water efficient landscaping ordinances or current Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance standards, whichever is more stringent; •requirements for water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings; •65 percent construction/demolition waste diverted from landfills; •inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency; and •low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring, and particle boards. Electricity and natural gas service to the project site is provided by SDG&E. Once operational, the project would use electricity and natural gas to run various appliances and equipment, including space and water heaters, air conditioners, ventilation equipment, lights, and numerous other devices. Generally, electricity use is higher in the warmer months due to increased air conditioning needs, and natural gas use is highest when the weather is colder as a result of high heating demand. The project would be required to meet the mandatory energy requirements of 2019 CALGreen and the California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations) and would benefit from the efficiencies associated with these regulations as they relate to building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning mechanical systems, water- heating systems, and lighting. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 78 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -33-Initial Study Additionally, the project would comply with the following ordinances adopted by the City Council in March 2019 aimed at reducing GHG emissions in new construction and alterations to existing buildings. Projects requiring building permits will be subject to these ordinances, which address the following: •Energy efficiency (Ord. No. CS-347) •Solar photovoltaic systems (Ord. No. CS-347) •Water heating systems using renewable energy (Ord. Nos. CS-347 and CS-348) •Electric vehicle charging (Ord. No. CS-349) •Transportation demand management (Ord. No. CS-350) City Council Policy 71 – Energy Conservation and Management was issued in June 2006. It states “It is the policy of the city that design and specifications for new civic facilities be evaluated and selected on the basis of total lifetime costs of construction and operation and that such specifications be reviewed continually so that the most current energy conservation techniques, materials, and appliances are utilized in their construction. The goal is that, whenever practicable, and within a reasonable cost/benefit ratio, new facilities will be designed to be at least 25 percent more energy efficient than required by the State of California, Title 24 Energy Regulations. The following principles will be encouraged for all newly constructed facilities and major building renovation projects for City facilities.” It also states that the city strives to achieve LEED "Silver" Level Certification or the equivalent for all new city facilities. Consistent with city policies on environmental sustainability, the office building would be designed to achieve a LEED rating level of silver or higher. Solar PV panels would be installed on the roof of the office building and the parking structure to support a goal of reaching a net-zero energy use facility. The project would also include EV charging stations and water efficient landscaping. Further, the project would comply with all applicable CAP ordinances by increasing energy efficiency, installing solar PV systems, using renewable energy water heating systems, installing EV charging stations, and implementing a transportation demand management program. Therefore, operation of the project would not result in the use of excessive amounts of fuel or other forms of energy, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact The applicable state plans that address renewable energy and energy efficiency are CALGreen, the California Energy Code, and RPS, and the applicable local plan is CAP. As discussed in Section VI(a) above, the project would be required to meet the mandatory energy requirements of 2019 CALGreen and the 2019 California Energy Code and would be consistent with CAP ordinances and City Council Policy 71. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of CALGreen and the California Energy Code, or with SDG&E’s implementation of RPS, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 79 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -34-Initial Study VII.GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No Im p a c t a)Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i.Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division ofMines and Geology Special Publication 42. ☐☐☒☐ ii.Strong seismic ground shaking?☐☐☒☐ iii.Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?☐☐☒☐ iv.Landslides?☐☐☒☐ b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?☐☐☒☐ c)Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? ☐☐☒☐ d)Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Section 1803.5.3 of the California Building Code (2016), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?☐☒☐☐ e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ☐☐☐☒ f)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?☐☒☐☐ a.i) Less than Significant Impact SCST prepared an Updated Geotechnical Investigation for the project (Appendix D; SCST 2019). The Updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that the project site is not located within an Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and that Rose Canyon is the closest active fault located approximately 7.5 miles southwest of the project site. Consequently, the risk associated with fault rupture would be low. Therefore, the project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects associated with fault rupture, and impacts would be less than significant. a.ii) Less than Significant Impact The project site is located in the seismically active southern California region. As described in Section VII.a.ii) above, Rose Canyon is the closest active fault located approximately 7.5 miles southwest of the project site. Consequently, the project may be subject to seismic ground shaking. However, all project structures would be designed consistent with the seismic standards of the CBC to ensure structural integrity during a seismic event. Therefore, the project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 80 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -35-Initial Study a.iii) Less than Significant Impact Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated, generally fine sands and silts are subjected to strong ground shaking. The soils lose shear strength and become liquid, potentially resulting in large total and differential ground surface settlements as well as possible lateral spreading during an earthquake. The Updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that due to the relatively dense nature of the materials beneath the site, the potential for liquefaction and dynamic settlement to occur is low. Therefore, the project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects associated with seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, and impacts would be less than significant. a.iv) Less than Significant Impact The Updated Geotechnical Investigation did not identify any evidence of landslides or slope instabilities. Consequently, the potential for landslides or slope instability is considered low. Therefore, the project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects associated with landslides, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact Project construction would expose soils, which would have the potential to result in soil erosion. However, the project would prepare a SWPPP consistent with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit. The SWPPP would document construction BMPs, which may include, but would not be limited to, vegetation stabilization planting, hydraulic stabilization hydroseeding, silt fencing, fiber rolls, and spill prevention/control measures that would prevent soil erosion. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, and impacts would be less than significant. c)Less than Significant Impact The Updated Geotechnical Investigation did not identify any evidence of landslides or slope instabilities. Similarly, updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that the site is not located in an area of known subsidence associated with fluid withdrawal (groundwater or petroleum). The Updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that due to the relatively dense nature of the materials beneath the site, the potential for liquefaction and dynamic settlement to occur is low. Therefore, the project would not result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. Impacts would be less than significant. d)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that the site is located in the coastal plain and is underlain by fill and Lusardi Formation. The Updated Geotechnical Investigation further determined that subsurface conditions consist of potentially compressible fill and expansive soils. The on-site materials tested have expansion indexes ranging from 2 to 66, which exceeds the significance threshold of an expansion index of 50 or less. This would be considered a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation measure GEO-1 would reduce impacts associated with expansive soils to a level less than significant. GEO-1: Geotechnical Recommendations The project would be required to implement the geotechnical recommendations presented in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation. These include, but are not limited to, recommendations related to potentially compressible fill, cut/fill transitions, expansive soils, and difficult excavations. The geotechnical engineer should review project plans and specifications prior to bidding and construction to check that April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 81 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -36-Initial Study the intent of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation have been incorporated. Observations and tests should be performed during construction. If the conditions encountered during construction differ from those anticipated based on the subsurface exploration program, the presence of the geotechnical engineer during construction would enable an evaluation of the exposed conditions and modifications of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation or development of additional recommendations in a timely manner. e)No Impact The project does not propose the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No impact would occur. f)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The San Diego Natural History Museum (SDNHM) prepared a Paleontological Resource Assessment (Appendix E; SDNHM 2021). A paleontological field survey was not conducted due to the extensive existing development at the site, the presence of artificial fill, and the lack of surface exposures of native sedimentary deposits. A review was conducted of relevant published geologic maps, published geological and paleontological reports, the site-specific Updated Geotechnical Investigation completed for the project (see Appendix D; SCST 2019), and other relevant literature (e.g., field trip guidebooks, theses and dissertations, and unpublished paleontological mitigation reports). This approach was followed in recognition of the direct relationship between paleontological resources and the geologic formations within which they are entombed. Knowing the geologic history of a particular area and the fossil productivity of geologic formations that occur in that area, it is possible to predict where fossils would, or would not, be encountered. A paleontological records search was conducted at the SDNHM in order to determine if any documented fossil collection localities occur within the project site or immediate surrounding area. The SDNHM records search involved examination of the paleontological database for any records of known fossil collection localities from sedimentary deposits similar to those underlying the Project site within an approximately one-mile radius. Published geologic mapping documents that the project site is entirely underlain by the Lusardi Formation. The site-specific Updated Geotechnical Investigation determined that deposits of the Lusardi Formation underlying the project site consist of silty to clayey sandstone and conglomerate and are overlain throughout by previously placed artificial fill deposits measuring between 6 inches and 11.5 feet thick. Fill deposits are thickest in the southwestern portion of the site, where they measure between 7 and 11.5 feet thick. To date, identifiable fossils have not been recovered from the Lusardi Formation. However, the Cretaceous age of this rock unit coupled with its terrestrial depositional setting suggest the potential that it may contain significant paleontological resources. The recovery of rare fossils of terrestrial organisms (e.g., leaves, stems, and wood of vascular plants and skeletal remains of dinosaurs) from marine strata of the possibly contemporaneous Point Loma Formation, suggests the potential presence of such fossils in the terrestrial deposits of the Lusardi Formation. Artificial fill has been previously disturbed and may have been imported to its current location. Any fossils these deposits may contain have lost their original stratigraphic and geographic context, and therefore are not considered to be scientifically significant. A total of 62 documented SDNHM fossil collection localities are located within a one-mile radius of the project site. The vast majority of these localities are from the late Cretaceous-age (approximately April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 82 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -37-Initial Study 75 million years old) Point Loma Formation, which lies stratigraphically just above the Lusardi Formation and is mapped to the west and south of the project site. Additional nearby SDNHM localities are from the middle Eocene-age Santiago Formation and Pleistocene-age nonmarine terrace deposits, neither of which occur within the project site. While published geologic mapping does not indicate that the Point Loma Formation underlies the Project site, previous paleontological monitoring conducted by PaleoServices staff during 2013–2014 construction of the Carlsbad Desalination Pipeline project documented fossil-bearing strata of the Point Loma Formation along Faraday Avenue in areas mapped as the Lusardi Formation. Specifically, fragmentary impressions of vascular plants (including a stem fragment of a member of the coniferous evergreen tree family Araucariaceae) were recovered from a series of collecting sites located along Faraday Avenue, approximately 0.2 mile due south of the project site. These sites were recovered from an unusual basal conglomerate member of the Point Loma Formation consisting of a moderately indurated cobble conglomerate in a matrix of yellowish-brown coarse-grained sandstone, with fossil bearing horizons of blueish gray to greenish gray siltstones, sandy siltstones, and sandstones. Based on these previous observations, it is possible that the silty/clayey sandstone and gravel to boulder conglomerate strata encountered in geotechnical borings within the Project site could actually represent the Point Loma Formation. In general, the Lusardi Formation can be differentiated from the basal conglomerate of the Point Loma Formation based on the presence of larger and more weathered clasts of locally-derived plutonic and metavolcanic rock, a lack of siltstone/sandstone horizons, and its heavily indurated nature. Artificial fill deposits present within the project site are assigned a low paleontological potential, because the stratigraphic and geologic context of any contained fossils has been lost. Consistent with city Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Guidelines (City of Carlsbad 2017), the Lusardi Formation is assigned a moderate paleontological potential. This rating is based on its non-marine sedimentary origin, late Cretaceous age, and possible contemporaneity with the marine Point Loma Formation. It should also be kept in mind that the strata underlying the project site may in fact represent sandstones and conglomerates at the base of the Point Loma Formation. Additionally, the presence of dozens of fossil collection localities from the Point Loma Formation in the vicinity of the project site, including in areas depicted as the Lusardi Formation on published geologic maps, supports a high paleontological potential for all late Cretaceous strata in this area. Cretaceous-age strata mapped as the Lusardi Formation underlie artificial fill throughout the project site at depths ranging from as little as 6 inches to as much as 11.5 feet below existing grade. Because remedial grading is planned to expose formational materials, these strata would be impacted at or near the maximum depths of remedial grading and would also be impacted during footing excavations for the parking structure. Therefore, project construction would have the potential to impact paleontological resources, which would be considered a significant impact. Implementation of mitigation measure PAL-1 would reduce this impact to a level less than significant. PAL-1: Paleontological Resources Monitoring Implementation of a paleontological mitigation program, in the form of paleontological monitoring, is recommended for earthwork at the project site that will directly impact previously undisturbed strata mapped as the Lusardi Formation (or unmapped strata of the Point Loma Formation, if present). The paleontological mitigation program would include the following measures: April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 83 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -38-Initial Study a.Pre-construction (personnel and repository): Prior to the commencement of construction, a qualified Principal Paleontologist shall be retained to oversee the mitigation program. The city defines a Principal Paleontologist as a person with a graduate degree in paleontology, geology, or related field, and who has at least one year of prior experience as a principal investigator. In addition, a regional fossil repository shall be designated to receive any discovered fossils. Because the project is in San Diego County, the recommended repository is the San Diego Natural History Museum. b.Pre-construction (meeting): The Principal Paleontologist should attend the pre-construction meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules, paleontological field techniques, and safety issues. c.Pre-construction (training): The Principal Paleontologist shall conduct a paleontological resource contractor awareness training workshop to be attended by earth excavation personnel. d.During construction (monitoring): A paleontological monitor (working under the direction of the Principal Paleontologist) should be on-site on a full-time basis during all original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits mapped as the Lusardi Formation (moderate paleontological potential) and/or Point Loma Formation (high paleontological potential) to inspect exposures for unearthed fossils. Monitoring is recommended during earthwork that exceeds the depth of fill in the vicinity of the proposed general services building and general services warehouse/shop (southern portion of the site), which ranges from 2 to 11.5 feet thick, and during earthwork extending at least 1 foot below existing grade elsewhere within the site, including for the proposed parking structure (eastern portion of the site). e.During construction (fossil recovery): If fossils are discovered, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them. Bulk sedimentary matrix samples may also be collected for stratigraphic horizons that appear likely to contain microscopic fossil remains. In most cases, this fossil salvage can be completed in a short period of time. However, some fossil specimens (e.g., a bone bed or a complete large skeleton) may require an extended salvage period. In these instances, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) has the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely manner. f.Post-construction (treatment): Fossil remains collected during monitoring and salvage should be prepared (including washing of sediments to recover microfossils), repaired, sorted, and cataloged as part of the mitigation program. g.Post-construction (curation): Prepared fossils, along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photos, and maps, should be deposited (as a donation) in the designated fossil repository. Donation of the fossils shall be accompanied by financial support for initial specimen storage. h.Post-construction (final report): A final summary paleontological mitigation report should be completed that outlines the results of the mitigation program. This report should include discussions of the methods used, stratigraphic section(s) exposed, fossils collected, inventory lists of catalogued fossils, and significance of recovered fossils. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 84 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -39-Initial Study VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment?☐☐☒☐ b)Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?☐☐☒☐ In September 2015, the city adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP), which was subsequently revised in May 2020. The CAP is a plan for the reduction of GHG emissions in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5 that outlines actions that the city will undertake to achieve its proportional share of state greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of the CAP. In March 2019, the City Council adopted several ordinances aimed at reducing GHG in new construction and alterations to existing buildings. Projects requiring building permits will be subject to these ordinances, which address the following: •Energy efficiency measures (Ord. No. CS-347) •Solar photovoltaic systems (Ord. No. CS-347) •Water heating systems using renewable energy (Ord. Nos. CS-347 and CS-348) •Electric vehicle charging stations (Ord. No. CS-349) •Transportation demand management (Ord. No. CS-350) The CAP established a screening threshold of 900 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2E) per year for new development projects in order to determine if a project would need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP through the Consistency Checklist and/or a self-developed GHG emissions reduction program (Self-developed Program). Projects that are projected to emit fewer than 900 MT CO2E annually would not make a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact of climate change, and therefore, do not need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP. Regardless of this screening threshold, all projects requiring building permits are subject to the above-referenced CAP ordinances. Such projects are therefore required to show compliance with the ordinances through submittal of a completed Consistency Checklist. For a project that requests a land use change through a General Plan amendment, master plan/specific plan amendment, and/or zone change, a project-specific GHG emissions analysis as described in Section 4 of the P-31 GHG Guidance must be submitted as part of the discretionary permit application. If the study reveals the project to be more GHG-intensive as compared to that assumed for the existing land use designation, and the project’s emissions would be at or above the screening threshold of 900 MT CO2E, the project applicant would need to demonstrate compliance with the CAP ordinances through completion of a CAP Consistency Checklist and identify additional mitigation measures to offset the increase in emissions resulting from the land use change. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 85 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -40-Initial Study The city’s CAP contains a baseline inventory of GHG emissions for 2012, a projection of emissions to 2035 (corresponding to the General Plan horizon year), a calculation of the city’s targets based on a reduction from the 2012 baseline, and emission reductions with implementation of the CAP. Carlsbad emitted a total of 977,000 MT CO2E in 2012. Accounting for future population and economic growth, the city projects GHG emissions of 956,000 MT CO2E in 2035. The CAP set a target to achieve a 4 percent reduction from the 2012 baseline by 2020 based on the recommendation by the California Air Resources Board (ARB). The CAP also includes a reduction target to reduce emissions below the 2012 baseline by 52 percent by 2035. Therefore, the city must implement strategies that reduce emissions to 937,920 MT CO2E in 2020 and 468,960 MT CO2E in 2035. By meeting the 2020 and 2035 targets, the city will meet the 2030 state goal identified in SB 32 and maintain a trajectory to meet its proportional share of the 2050 state target identified in Executive Order S-3-05. a)Less than Significant Impact Individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to have a substantial effect on global climate change (South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] 2008b; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2009). However, continued development may contribute to the cumulative global accumulation of GHG emissions that could result in adverse impacts on the current climate. In the context of CEQA, “GHG impacts are exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective” (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association [CAPCOA] 2008). While the geographic extent of the cumulative contributions to GHGs and climate change is worldwide, relating the contribution of a single project to cumulative global emissions marginalizes project impacts. This makes it difficult to assess the significance of a single project, particularly one designed to accommodate anticipated population growth. The city’s CAP was adopted September 2015 and revised in May 2020 (City of Carlsbad 2020). The CAP is designed to reduce the city’s GHG emissions and streamline environmental review of future development projects in the city in accordance with CEQA. The CAP includes actions to carry out the General Plan’s goals and policies. The CAP states that “the City has determined that new development projects emitting less than 900 MT CO2E annual GHG would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts.” A project that exceeds the 900 MT CO2E screening threshold shall comply with the CAP in one of two ways (City of Carlsbad 2020): •Checklist Approach. The Project Review Checklist contained in the CAP provides direction about measures to be incorporated in individual projects, which will be used during the normal development review process. Project features that help a project meet the provisions of the CAP shall then become part of project conditions of approval. •Self-Developed Program Approach. Rather than use the standard checklist, project proponents can develop their own program that would result in the same outcome as the checklist. Appendix E of the CAP provides a non-exclusive list of potential mitigation measures that can be applied at the project level to reduce project-level GHG emissions. Other measures not listed in the appendix may be considered, provided that their effectiveness in reducing GHG emissions can be demonstrated. The self-developed program approach and selection of mitigation measures shall be subject to city review and approval. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 86 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -41-Initial Study The project would result in short-term emissions from construction and long-term emissions associated with project operation. RECON prepared an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Letter Report for the project (see Appendix A; RECON 2022a). In the letter report, construction and operation GHG emissions associated with the project were estimated using the CalEEMod software version 2016.3.2 and compared to the CAPCOA’s recommended screening threshold of 900 MT CO2E per year. Relevant analysis from the letter report is included below and modeling results are summarized in Table 4 below. For a full discussion of methodology and assumptions, see Appendix A. Table 4 Project GHG Emissions in 2020 (MT CO2E per year) Emissions Source Project Emissions Vehicles 403 Energy Use 224 Area Sources <1 Water Use 118 Solid Waste Disposal 56 Construction1 27 Total 828 SOURCE: Attachment A. 1 Following the recommendation of multiple air districts, including the SCAQMD, construction-related emissions were amortized over a 30-year period (to represent the equivalent annual emissions) and added to operational emissions. As shown in Table 4 above, the project would generate 828 MT CO2E annually, which would be less than CAPCOA’s recommended screening threshold of 900 MT CO2E. As described in the project description above, solar PV panels would be installed on the roof of the office building and the parking structure to support a goal of reaching a net-zero energy use facility. As a conservative analysis, the project was modeled assuming the installed solar PV panels would generate 50 percent of the project’s required energy use. Consequently, if the project were to achieve net-zero energy use, the GHG emission associated with energy use would be less than the 828 MT CO2E modeled for the project. Therefore, the project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 established GHG emission reduction targets for the state, and Assembly Bill (AB) 32 codified the 2020 goal of EO S-3-05 and launched the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2008) that outlined the reduction measures needed to reach these targets. The project is consistent with the state reduction targets for transportation, energy, and other emissions associated with land use and development. In short, because the project would emit less than 900 MT CO2E annually, the project would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts. EO B-30-15 establishes an interim GHG emission reduction goal for the state of California by 2030 of 40 percent below 1990 levels. As discussed above, EO B-30-15’s goal to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 has not been codified by the Legislature. Nonetheless, because of the ongoing controversy regarding the application of EOs in the context of CEQA and the strong interest in California’s post-2020 climate policy, this analysis renders a determination as to whether the project would conflict with or impede substantial progress towards the statewide reduction goals established by EO B-30-15 for 2030 and by EO S-3-05 for 2050. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 87 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -42-Initial Study Project emissions would continue to decline as a result of federal, state, and local implementation measures such as increased federal and state vehicle efficiency standards and SDG&E increase renewable sources of energy in accordance with California Renewable Portfolio Strategy mandates. Based on currently available models and regulatory forecasting, project emissions would continue to decline from 2030 through at least 2050. Given the reasonably anticipated decline in project emissions once fully constructed and operational, the project is in line with the GHG reductions needed to achieve the EOs’ interim (2030) and horizon-year (2050) goals. The project would not impede substantial progress toward long-term GHG goals. As such, the project’s impacts with respect to EO B-30-15 and EO S-3-05 would be less than significant. Additionally, a CAP Consistency Checklist was completed for the project that documented the project’s consistency with the requirements of the city’s CAP (see Appendix A, Attachment 2). As shown in the CAP Consistency Checklist, the project would be consistent with the existing land use and zoning designations of the project site and would be compliant with the city’s CAP Ordinances by increasing energy efficiency, installing solar photovoltaic systems, providing electric vehicle parking, and preparing a transportation demand management plan. Because the project would emit less than 900 MT CO2E annually, and because the project would be consistent with the city’s CAP Ordinances as demonstrated through the CAP Consistency Checklist, the project would not conflict with implementation of the city’s CAP. Therefore, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing the emissions of GHGs, and impacts would be less than significant. IX.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?☐☐☒☐ b)Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ☐☐☒☐ c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ☐☐☐☒ d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? ☐☒☐☐ e)For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? ☐☐☒☐ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 88 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -43-Initial Study IX.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t f)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adoptedemergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?☐☐☒☐ g)Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?☐☐☒☐ a)Less than Significant Impact The project site includes a vehicle washing and fueling station, and an existing central equipment plant for standby generators, boilers, and cooling towers. Hazardous materials associated with these uses include fuels such as propane, gasoline and diesel, automotive products such as oils, solvents, and paints, cleaning products, and pesticides/herbicides. The project would continue to have similar uses and would also involve the routine use and storage of hazardous materials. Existing and proposed storage, handling, transport, emission and disposal of hazardous substances would be in full compliance with local, state, and federal regulations such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. California Government Code Section 65850.2 requires that no final certificate of occupancy or its substantial equivalent be issued unless there is verification that the owner or authorized agent has met, or is meeting, the applicable requirements of the Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95, Article 2, Section 25500-25520. The project would comply with the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health (DEH) requirements for a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) and would undergo routine inspections for regulation compliance. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact As described in Section VIII.a) above, storage, handling, transport, emission and disposal of hazardous substances would be in full compliance with local, state, and federal regulations. Additionally, the project would comply with the County of San Diego DEH requirements for a HMBP and would undergo routine inspections for regulation compliance. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. c)No Impact The nearest schools include the Pacific Ridge High School, which is 1.3 miles to the southeast, and the Sage Creek High School, which is 1.5 miles to the northwest. Therefore, the project would not emit or handle hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of a school. No impact would occur. d)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated A hazardous waste site record search was completed in May 2015, using Geotracker, an online database of hazardous site records maintained by the California State Water Resources Control Board. The project site is recorded as an open case on the Geotracker database. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 89 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -44-Initial Study In April 2012, city staff discovered that an underground supply line for a hydraulic lift associated with the existing fleet facility had leaked an unknown quantity of hydrocarbons to the soil. City staff submitted a request for remediation guidance from the County of San Diego (County) DEH Voluntary Assistance Program. County DEH subsequently opened Case #H39788-001 against the property and sent an advisory letter to city staff. In its advisory letter, County DEH informed the city that they may either (1) develop a work plan of borings, sampling, reports, etc. to assess the extent of contamination and human health risk so the case may be closed, or (2) dispose of soil collected at the site as a hazardous material and leave the case open and inactive until soil disturbance occurs. City staff elected for the second option; thus, the project site has remained on the list of open cases with no further developments since April 2012. The extent of soils contamination remains unknown. Disturbance of soil with hydrocarbon contamination may result in health risks to construction workers, the public, or the environment. There are various contaminants of key concern that may be associated with hydrocarbon releases; these contaminants may have carcinogenic or acute health risks. As the quantity of hydrocarbons released to soils and the extent of soils contamination has not been investigated, it is not possible to conclude that normal best management practices would preclude or minimize the hazard. Therefore, impacts would be considered potentially significant. Implementation of mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would reduce impacts associated with existing soils contamination to a level less than significant. HAZ-1: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment The city will retain a qualified environmental professional to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) consistent with ASTM standards to ascertain the extent of soils contamination. The city will subsequently consult with County DEH to determine appropriate measures to avoid or minimize health risk associated with soils contamination. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA and recommendations of the County DEH, subsequent investigations such as additional soils sampling or health risk assessment and remediation measures such as soils extraction, including soils extraction, groundwater pumping and treatment, or soil vapor extraction, may be required. Upon completion of soils investigations and any necessary remediation and prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the city Engineer will review and approve a Construction Plan that avoids or minimizes health risks associated with soils contamination. HAZ-2: Soils Disposal Prior to soils investigations outlined in mitigation measure HAZ-1, The city will verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that any soils extracted from the project site including, but not limited to soils extraction for activities such as borings or samplings will be transported and disposed of consistent with State Administrative Manual (SAM) procedures for hazardous materials. Consistent with subsequent recommendations by the environmental professional performing the Phase II ESA required under HAZ-1 and County DEH, the City will also verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that potentially contaminated soils extracted during soils investigations or soils remediation are transported and disposed of consistent with SAM procedures for hazardous materials. Compliance with mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would preclude hazards associated with potential disturbance, transport, or disposal of potentially contaminated soils. Therefore, the project would not April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 90 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -45-Initial Study create a significant hazard to the public or the environment and impacts would be reduced to a level that is less than significant. e)Less than Significant Impact The project site is approximately 0.5 mile northeast of McClellan-Palomar Airport. The San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) last amended the McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) on December 1, 2011 (SDCRAA 2011). As identified in the ALUCP, the project site is in the Airport Impact Area (AIA) in Safety Zone 6 – Traffic Pattern Zone. Safety Zone 6 is the least strict zone, and encompasses a larger area than the other five zones combined. The ALUCP states that the risks in Zone 6 are much lower than risks in other zones and indicates that all types of development are considered compatible or conditionally compatible with Safety Zone 6. The city has obtained a Part 77 determination from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that the project would pose no hazard to air navigation (Appendix F; FAA 2019). Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working in the project area, and impacts would be less than significant. f)Less than Significant Impact The project site is immediately adjacent to the city’s Public Safety Center to the southeast, and the Safety Training Center to the south. Additionally, city Fire Station 5 is immediately south of the Safety Training Center. Project operation would not result in substantial changes to circulation patterns for proximate roads such as Orion Way, Orion Street, or Impala Drive and thus would not impede emergency response via these roads. Additionally, construction staging areas would be confined to the project site and would not impede circulation on these roads. In the event of an emergency, ingress and egress from the project site would typically be to the south or west via Orion Way, Orion Street, or Impala Drive. Current features that impede ingress and egress include a chain link fence that secures the fleet parking area. The project would expand the secured parking area by moving the fence further south; however, this would not reduce the number or quality or ingress and egress routes from the site. The project would discontinue an existing informal access point into the Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve from the western fleet yard. This access point is not considered to have substantial value as an ingress or egress route. Changes to the circulation network would be limited to ingress and egress routes from the site. Therefore, the project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. g)Less than Significant Impact Review of Figure 6-10 of the city’s Public Safety Element determined that the project site is located within an area designated by the city as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). However, the project would not extend beyond the existing chain link fence that separates the currently developed area from undeveloped lands within the North County MSCP Preserve Area. Therefore, the project would not exacerbate fire risk compared to the existing condition. Carlsbad Fire Station 5 is located immediately southwest of the project site and would be able to provide fire protection services in the event of a wildfire. Additionally, the project has been designed to include the latest ignition resistant building materials and all structures would include interior sprinklers consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code. This would result in facilities that are less susceptible to fire than currently exist on-site. The project has also been designed consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code setback requirements to minimize fire risk, and project landscaping would be consistent with the requirements of the city’s adopted Landscape Manual as it relates to fire protection. Furthermore, the city Fire Marshal has reviewed and approved the project. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures, either directly or April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 91 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -46-Initial Study indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, and impacts would be less than significant. X.HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?☐☐☒☐ b)Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? ☐☐☒☐ c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner, which would: i.Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite;☐☐☒☐ ii.Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite ☐☐☒☐ iii.Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or ☐☐☒☐ iv.Impede or redirect flood flows?☐☐☒☐ d)In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?☐☐☐☒ e)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?☐☐☒☐ a)Less than Significant Impact The city Municipal Code Section 15.12, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control, prohibits a variety of discharges including, but not limited to, the discharge from automotive services repair, equipment maintenance, and automobile washing and mandates that all persons utilize best management practices to the maximum extent practicable to eliminate or reduce pollutants entering city storm drains. Project design BMPs would include eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy both water quality and hydromodification requirements. These BMPs would detain and treat water used to clean vehicles and storm runoff associated with new, replaced and existing impervious surfaces such as the parking lot and buildings. Project construction would expose soils, which would have the potential to result in soil erosion. However, the project would prepare a SWPPP consistent with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit. The SWPPP would document potential construction BMPs, which may include, but would not be limited to, vegetation stabilization planting, hydraulic April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 92 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -47-Initial Study stabilization hydroseeding, silt fencing, fiber rolls, and spill prevention/control measures that would prevent soil erosion. In the post-project condition, the project would introduce landscaping in order to preserve soils and prevent erosion. Additionally, WSP prepared a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) to document post-project BMPs that would preserve water quality (Appendix G; WSP 2022a). The SWQMP documented that the project would introduce eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy hydromodification requirements. Therefore, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact The project does not propose groundwater extraction. The project would increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on-site from 5.42 acres to 7.50 acres. However, water would continue to infiltrate through 0.74 acre of the post-construction development footprint that would remain pervious. Therefore, the project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge, and impacts would be less than significant. c.i) Less than Significant Impact The project site does not include a stream or river and the majority of the site is developed. Runoff on the project site flows from north to south on to Orion Way, and then enters the existing storm drain system. Project construction would expose soils, which would have the potential to result in soil erosion. Similarly, project construction may involve the use of small amounts of solvents, cleaners, paint, oils and fuel for equipment that if accidentally released could impact water quality. However, the project would prepare a SWPPP consistent with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction General Permit. The SWPPP would document potential construction BMPs, which may include, but would not be limited to, vegetation stabilization planting, hydraulic stabilization hydroseeding, silt fencing, fiber rolls, and spill prevention/control measures that would preserve water quality. The project would preserve the existing drainage pattern in the post-project condition. Runoff would continue to flow from north to south on to Orion Way, and then enter the existing storm drain system. Additionally, the project would introduce landscaping in order to preserve soils and prevent erosion in the post-project condition. The SWQMP documented that the project would introduce eight biofiltration basins and two modular wetlands with combined pollutant control and flow control to satisfy hydromodification requirements. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite, and impacts would be less than significant. c.ii) Less than Significant Impact The project would preserve the existing drainage pattern in the post-project condition. Runoff would continue to flow from north to south on to Orion Way, and then enter the existing storm drain system. The Preliminary Hydrology Report documented that the project would increase storm water runoff rates under the 10-, 50-, and 100-year storm events as follows: •Increase the 10-year storm water runoff rate from 24.32 cubic feet per second (cfs) in the existing condition to 27.01 cfs in the post-project condition. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 93 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -48-Initial Study •Increase the 50-year storm water runoff rate from 33.77 cfs in the existing condition to 37.51 cfs in the post-project condition. •Increase the 100-year storm water runoff rate from 40.53 cfs in the existing condition to 45.01 cfs in the post-project condition (Appendix H; WSP 2022b). However, the existing downstream storm drain system is sufficiently sized to safely store the increased post-project runoff volume described in Section X.c.ii above. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in manner that would substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff that would result in flooding on- or offsite, and impacts would be less than significant. c.iii) Less than Significant Impact As described in Section X.c.ii) above, the project would preserve the existing drainage pattern in the post- project condition. Runoff would continue to flow from north to south on to Orion Way, and then enter the existing storm drain system. Furthermore, the existing downstream storm drain system is sufficiently sized to safely store the increased runoff volume . Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in manner that would impede or redirect flood flows, and impacts would be less than significant. c.iv) Less than Significant Impact Review of Figure 6-1 of the city’s Public Safety Element determined that the project site is not located within an area designated by the city as a 100 Year Flood –High Risk Coastal Area or 100-Year Flood High Risk Area. The existing downstream storm drain system is sufficiently sized to safely store the increased runoff volume as described in Section X.c.ii above. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern in manner that would impede or redirect flood flows, and impacts would be less than significant. d)No Impact Review of Figure 6-1 of the city’s Public Safety Element determined that the project site is not located within an area designated by the city as a 100 Year Flood –High Risk Coastal Area or 100-Year Flood High Risk Area. Review of Figure 6-2 of the city’s Public Safety Element determined that the project site is not located within an area designated by the city as Dam Inundation Area. Review of Figure 6-3 of the Public Safety Element determined that the project site is not located within an area designated by the city as within the Maximum Tsunami Projected Runup. The project would not be at risk from a seiche because it is not located near a large water body and is at a higher elevation than the surrounding topography. The project would not be at risk from mudflow inundation because the site is at a higher elevation than the surrounding topography. Therefore, the project would not risk the release of pollutants due to project inundation associated with flood hazards, tsunami, or seiche zones. No impacts would occur. e)Less than Significant Impact As described in Section X.a) above, the project would implement construction and operational BMPs that would prevent erosion and pollution from affecting water quality. As described in Section X.b) above, the increase in the amount of impermeable surfaces on-site from 5.42 acres to 7.50 acres would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. Water would continue to infiltrate through the 0.74 acre of the post-construction development footprint that would remain pervious. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 94 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -49-Initial Study XI.LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Physically divide an established community?☐☐☐☒ b)Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?☐☐☒☐ a)No Impact The project would be located within an established Public Works and Public Safety complex. All work would be located within existing complex and would not impact any surrounding properties or affect the existing land use pattern. Changes to the existing circulation network would be limited to improved connections to Orion Drive and Orion Way that would not affect any surrounding roadways. No new roadways or expansion of roadways would be required to accommodate the project. The project would be served by utilities that are already serving the Public Works and Public Safety complex. The project would not impact the existing 30-foot stone stairway “trail” or viewpoint area in the northeastern corner of the project site. Therefore, the project would not physically divide an established community. No impact would occur. b)Less than Significant Impact The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Public Facilities. Per the General Plan Land Use & Community Design Element, this designation “is intended to provide for schools, government facilities (civic buildings, libraries, maintenance yards, police and fire stations), public/quasi-public utilities, airport sites, and other facilities that have a public/quasi-public character.” Additionally, the project site is zoned Open Space, and the proposed land use is allowed by the Zoning Code with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. The site was intended to be developed and is not part of the adjacent open space preserve. Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, Zoning, allows for public and quasi- public office buildings in open space areas as identified in Section 21.33.020, permitted uses in the Open Space Zone, and defined by Section 21.04.297 Public and Quasi-Public Office Buildings and Accessory Utility Buildings and Facilities: “Public and quasi-public office buildings and accessory utility buildings and facilities” means and includes, but is not limited to, government office buildings and accessory utility buildings and facilities. Thus, the project is consistent with the city’s General Plan land use designation and zoning. The General Plan Land Use & Community Design Element does not contain goals or policies that directly implement the Public Facilities land use designation. However, given the project’s industrial setting, consistency can be found through relevant policies throughout the General Plan. For example, the project would be consistent with General Plan policies related to industrial use. By redeveloping an existing site that is surrounded by similar uses, the project would be consistent with land use policies that seek to “limit general industrial development within the community to those areas and uses with adequate transportation access (2-P.27)” and “require new industrial development to be located in modern, attractive, well-designed and landscaped industrial parks (2-P.30)”. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 95 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -50-Initial Study Further, redevelopment of the project site would also be consistent with these other Land Use & Community Design Element policies as well as those in the Mobility, Public Safety and Sustainability elements: Land Use & Community Design Element •“Promote infill development that makes efficient use of limited land supply, while ensuring compatibility and integration with existing uses (2-G.3)” •“Maintain land use compatibility between McClellan-Palomar Airport and surrounding land uses, and encourage the airport’s continued operations while ensure it does not unduly impact existing neighborhoods and communities (2-G.13)“ •“Ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided in a timely manner to preserve the quality of life for residents (2-G.21)” •“Establish development standards that will preserve natural features and characteristics, especially those within coastal, hillside and natural habitat areas (2-P.40) Mobility Element •“Require new employment development to provide secure bicycle parking on-site. Major employers should provide shower and changing rooms for employees as appropriate (3-P.39)” Public Safety Element •“Maintain safety services that are responsive to citizens’ needs to ensure a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community (6-G.3)” Sustainability Element •“Continue efforts to decrease use of energy and fossil fuel consumption in municipal operations, including transportation, waste reduction and recycling, and efficient building design and use (9- P.2)” As described in Section IV.f) above, the proposed impact area would not extend beyond the existing chain link fence that separates the currently developed area from the North County MSCP Preserve Area. Therefore, the project would not impact the North County MSCP Preserve Area or HMP future Hardline Preserve. As described in Section VIII.b) above, the project would emit less than 900 MT CO2E annually, and would be consistent with the city’s CAP Ordinances as demonstrated through the CAP Consistency Checklist. Therefore, the project would not conflict with implementation of the city’s CAP. The project has also been designed consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code setback requirements to minimize fire risk, and project landscaping would be consistent with the requirements of the city’s adopted Landscape Manual as it relates to both fire protection and water efficiency. In addition, the city has developed a Growth Management Plan (GMP) for the purpose of, among other things, ensuring all development is consistent with the General Plan and providing adequate facilities that keep pace with population growth. The GMP establishes performance standards for public facilities; most relevant to the project are performance standards relating to city administrative facilities and circulation. Regarding city administrative facilities, the performance standard requires “1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period or prior to construction of 6,250 dwelling units, beginning at the time the need is first identified.” The latest GMP Monitoring Report, prepared for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, identifies that current city administrative facilities exceed the performance standard. The report also identifies the Orion Center has a future contributor of additional administrative space. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 96 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -51-Initial Study Regarding circulation, the GMP establishes a requirement to maintain Level of Service (LOS) D or better for all modes that are subject to this multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) standard, as identified in Table 3-1 of the General Plan Mobility Element, excluding LOS exempt intersections and streets approved by the City Council. As described in more detail below in subsection XVII of this IS/MND, with implementation of mitigation the project is consistent with the city’s MMLOS standards for pedestrian, bicycles, and transit. Given the considerations above, the project would not impair implementation of the city’s Growth Management Program. Therefore, the project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant. XII.MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wit h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State?☐☐☐☒ b)Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineralresource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ☐☐☐☒ a-b) No Impact The city is devoid of any non-renewable energy resources of economic value to the region and the residents of the State. Mineral resources within the city are no longer being utilized and extracted as exploitable natural resources. Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. No impact would occur. XIII. NOISE Would the project result in:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wit h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? ☐☐☒☐ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 97 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -52-Initial Study XIII. NOISE Would the project result in:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t b)Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?☐☐☒☐ c)For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ☐☐☒☐ a)Less than Significant Impact City noise standards include Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments, Allowable Noise Exposure, and Performance Standards from the city General Plan Noise Element, and Construction Hour Limitations mandated by Municipal Code Section 8.48.010. Additional applicable standards include Noise Compatibility Criteria established in the McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP. Construction Noise Project construction would result in temporary noise level increases from noise generated by project construction equipment used for site preparation, grading, building construction, and paving and vehicles hauling construction materials to and from the site. Proximate land uses include the La Posada de Guadalupe de Carlsbad Shelter approximately 380 feet to the northwest, the Joint First Responders Training Facility approximately 380 feet to the south, and the Safety Center approximately 420 feet to the southeast. As calculated in the Noise Letter Report and shown in Figure 7, construction noise levels would not exceed 75 dB(A) Leq beyond the project boundary, and noise levels at the nearby uses would be less than 65 dB(A) Leq. City Municipal Code Section 8.48.010 prohibits construction activities between the hours of 6:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. Monday through Friday, before 8:00 A.M. on Saturday, all day Sunday, and on any federal holiday. Project construction would only occur during the hours allowable by the Municipal Code. Therefore, temporary noise level increases associated with project construction would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of applicable standards, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 98 of 159 FIGURE 7 Construction Noise Contours IMPALA DR OR I ON S T ORION WAY ORIONWAY IMPALA DR OR I ON S T ORION WAY ORIONWAY Image Source: Nearmap (flown September 2021) 0 150Feet [Construction Noise 50 dB(A) Leq 55 dB(A) Leq 60 dB(A) Leq 65 dB(A) Leq 70 dB(A) Leq Project Boundary Survey Area Coastal Sage Scrub M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig7_ismnd.mxd 12/3/2021 fmm April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 99 of 159RECON D D 1111 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -54-Initial Study General Plan Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments The city’s Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Table (Table 5-1 of the Noise Element) identifies compatibility standards for noise exposure from all sources. The city’s General Plan does not identify compatibility standards for municipal facilities; the land use category in Table 5-1 of the Noise Element that is most similar to the proposed use is “Office Buildings, Business Commercial and Professional.” Community noise equivalent levels (CNEL) of up to 70 decibels (dB) are considered normally acceptable at land uses in this category; noise levels of up to 75 dB CNEL are conditionally acceptable when noise insulation features are incorporated into the project design. Noise levels above 75 dB CNEL are normally unacceptable. Figure 5-3 of the city’s General Plan Noise Element identifies projected future (2035) noise contours associated with transportation sources including major roadways, railways, and the McClellan-Palomar Airport. Noise contours shown include 60, 65, and 70 dB CNEL contours. The project site is not within the identified noise contours for transportation sources. Therefore, the project would not be exposed to noise from transportation sources that exceeds the applicable compatibility standard of 70 dB CNEL, and impacts would be less than significant. General Plan Allowable Noise Exposure In the General Plan Noise Element, Table 5-2, the city’s Allowable Noise Exposure Table identifies compatibility standards for noise exposure from non-transportation sources including, but not limited to, industrial facilities, automotive servicing, car washes, equipment yards, nightclubs, hotels, and shopping centers. The city’s General Plan does not identify compatibility standards for municipal facilities; the land use category that is most similar to the proposed use is “Commercial and Office Uses.” Indoor and outdoor noise levels of up to 50 and 65 dB CNEL, respectively, are acceptable at land uses in this category. For non- residential uses where an outdoor activity area is not proposed, outdoor noise standards do not apply. Non-transportation noise sources proximate to the project site include vehicle maintenance activities associated with the vehicle maintenance building, rooftop heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units on adjacent buildings, and emergency responder training exercises associated with the Joint First Responders Training Facility. As indicated by the Initial Study for the city’s Safety Training Center, multiple company training events may result in noise levels of up to 75 dB Leq at 50 feet from the center of training activities. Based on standard noise propagation, these activities would, therefore, result in noise levels of up to 63 dB(A) Leq at the nearest building façades of the proposed building. Vehicle maintenance and HVAC units are anticipated to generate lesser noise levels at building façades of the proposed building. The project does not propose noise-sensitive outdoor activity areas. Consequently, outdoor noise standards do not apply. Standard construction techniques provide an exterior-to-interior noise reduction of 20 dB when windows are closed (Federal Highway Administration 2011). Therefore, interior noise levels would not exceed the applicable interior noise standard of 50 dB CNEL, and impacts would be less than significant. General Plan Performance Standards (Operational Noise) In the General Plan Noise Element, Table 5-3, the city’s Performance Standards table, identifies noise level limits for all noise sources other than transportation and construction activities. Hourly noise level limits are a Leq of 55 dB during the daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) and 45 dB Leq at night (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 100 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -55-Initial Study Additionally, maximum noise levels (Lmax) may not exceed 75 dB during the daytime and 65 dB Lmax at night. Hourly and maximum noise level limits are measured at the property line of the noise source or sensitive receiver as applicable. These limits apply to all noise generated on-site, existing and proposed. Noise sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the project site include the Catholic Charities La Posada de Guadalupe de Carlsbad Shelter for homeless men to the northwest of the project site. Sources on the project site that may contribute to noise levels at the shelter may include vehicle maintenance activities associated with the vehicle maintenance building and activities associated with the vehicle washing and refueling station. New noise sources associated with the project would include rooftop HVAC units for the proposed building, indoor activities associated with the building workshops, and noise associated with the parking structure. As calculated in the noise letter report, noise levels due to existing and proposed on- site noise sources are not anticipated to result in noise levels that exceed applicable performance standards established in the General Plan (Appendix I; RECON 2022d). Operational Noise The project proposes to improve the existing fleet maintenance building and construct an office building, three warehouse/shop buildings, and a four-story parking structure on a developed site. Existing noise sources associated with the project site include maintenance activities associated with the vehicle maintenance building, and activities associated with the vehicle washing and refueling station, and equipment such as standby generators, boilers, and cooling towers at the central equipment plant. The project would not substantially alter these noise sources. The project would result in new noise sources including rooftop HVAC units for the proposed office building, indoor activities associated with the warehouse/shop buildings, and noise associated with the parking structure. The increase in vehicle traffic noise was accounted for as a part of the noise associated with the new parking structure, and the increase in maintenance noise is accounted for as part of the noise associated with the vehicle maintenance building. Using the parameters detailed in the Noise Letter Report, daytime and nighttime noise level contours due to these existing and future on-site noise sources were modeled using SoundPLAN. Noise levels were also modeled at 10 specific receivers located at the adjacent uses and the adjacent habitat. Daytime and nighttime noise level contours are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. Table 5 summarizes the modeled noise levels at the specific receiver locations. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 101 of 159 FIGURE 8 Daytime On-Site Generated Noise Contours d nt k "D"D "D"D "/"/ "/"/ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 910 d nt k "D"D "D"D "/"/ "/"/ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 910 Image Source: Nearmap (flown September 2021) 0 150Feet [Daytime Noise 40 dB(A) Leq 45 dB(A) Leq 50 dB(A) Leq 55 dB(A) Leq 60 dB(A) Leq 65 dB(A) Leq Noise Source d Existing Central Energy Plant nt Existing Fueling Station "/Existing HVAC "D Proposed HVAC k Proposed Car Wash Parking Structure M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig8_ismnd.mxd 12/3/2021 fmm !(Receivers Site Plan Project Boundary April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 102 of 159 1111 REC O N D FIGURE 9 Nighttime On-Site Generated Noise Contours d nt k "D"D "D"D "/"/ "/"/ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 910 d nt k "D"D "D"D "/"/ "/"/ !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( IMPALA DR ORION WAY OR I O N S T ORIONWAY 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 910 Image Source: Nearmap (flown September 2021) 0 150Feet [Nighttime Noise 40 dB(A) Leq 45 dB(A) Leq 50 dB(A) Leq 55 dB(A) Leq 60 dB(A) Leq 65 dB(A) Leq Noise Source d Existing Central Energy Plant nt Existing Fueling Station "/Existing HVAC "D Proposed HVAC k Proposed Car Wash Parking Structure M:\JOBS4\7663\common_gis\fig9_ismnd.mxd 12/3/2021 fmm !(Receivers Site Plan Project Boundary April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 103 of 159 1111 REC O N D Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -58-Initial Study Table 5 On-Site Generate Noise Levels [dB(A) Leq] Receiver Land Use Daytime/Nighttime Noise Level Limit Daytime Noise Level Nighttime Noise Level 1 La Posada de Guadalupe de Carlsbad Shelter 55/45 42 38 2 JC Baldwin Construction Company -- 38 35 3 Beckman Coulter, Inc. -- 34 31 4 City of Carlsbad Safety Training Center -- 43 41 5 Carlsbad Police Department -- 56 56 6 Sensitive Habitat 60/60 41 40 7 Sensitive Habitat 60/60 49 46 8 Sensitive Habitat 60/60 48 41 9 Sensitive Habitat 60/60 50 43 10 Sensitive Habitat 60/60 36 29 dB(A) Leq = A-weighted decibel equivalent noise level -- = Not Applicable. Not a sensitive land use. As shown in Table 5, noise levels at the nearest noise sensitive land use would be 42 dB(A) Leq during the daytime hours and 38 dB(A) Leq during the nighttime hours and would not exceed the applicable daytime and nighttime noise level limits of 55 and 45 dB(A) Leq, respectively. Additionally, daytime and nighttime noise levels at the adjacent sensitive habitat would not exceed 60 dB(A) Leq. Noise levels at the adjacent non-sensitive land uses (Receivers 2 through 5) are provided for informational purposes only. On-site generated noise levels are not anticipated to result in noise levels that exceed applicable performance standards established in the General Plan or otherwise adversely impact the adjacent sensitive habitat. Therefore, project operation would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of applicable standards, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact Project construction would not include activities that generate substantial vibration such as blasting or pile driving. Operation of the project would not include any substantial sources of groundborne vibration or noise. Therefore, the project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. c)Less than Significant Impact The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact related to private airstrips would occur. The project site is located approximately 0.5 mile northeast of McClellan-Palomar Airport. The SDCRAA amended the McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP on December 1, 2011. As identified in the ALUCP the project site is in the AIA. The McClellan-Palomar Airport ALUCP Noise Compatibility Criteria Table identifies compatibility standards for land uses exposed to aircraft noise. Public facilities are considered to be compatible with aircraft noise levels up to 65 dB CNEL and conditionally compatible with aircraft noise levels up to 70 dB CNEL if it can be demonstrated that interior noise levels would not exceed 50 dB CNEL. The project site is not within projected future (2035) noise contours associated with McClellan-Palomar Airport. Thus, the project would be exposed to aircraft noise levels of less than 60 dB CNEL and aircraft noise levels would not exceed applicable compatibility criteria of 65 dB CNEL. Therefore, the project would not expose people working at the project site to excessive noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 104 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -59-Initial Study XIV.POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or otherinfrastructure)? ☐☐☐☒ b)Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?☐☐☐☒ a)No Impact The project would provide office space to existing city staff and provide for more efficient fleet storage and maintenance and would not introduce any housing. The project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would not increase the number of employees. No new roadways or expansion of roadways would be required to accommodate the project. The project would be served by utilities that are already serving the Public Works and Public Safety complex. Therefore, the project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth. No impact would occur. b)No Impact The project site currently includes a fleet maintenance building, vehicle washing and fueling station, and parking areas and does not include any housing. The project would not displace any existing housing or people. No impact would occur. XV.PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impactsassociated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t w i t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Fire protection?☐☐☐☒ b)Police protection?☐☐☐☒ c)Schools?☐☐☐☒ d)Parks?☐☐☐☒ e)Other public facilities?☐☐☐☒ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 105 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -60-Initial Study a)No Impact The project proposes a government facility on a developed site that would be consistent with the city’s existing land use plan. The project site is within 0.1 mile of the city’s Fire Station 5. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for fire protection services that would necessitate new or physically altered facilities. No impact would occur. b)No Impact The project proposes a government facility on a developed site that would be consistent with the city’s existing land use plan. The project site is immediately adjacent to the city Public Safety Center, which supports police services. The project includes a covered evidence storage area for Police Department use at the eastern end of the project site, which may be used for vehicle impounds. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for police protection services that would necessitate new or physically altered facilities. No impact would occur. c)No Impact The project proposes a government facility that would allow for the consolidation of separate existing facilities and uses. The project would not introduce any housing and would not increase population growth that would result in a need for additional schools. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for school services that would necessitate new or physically altered facilities. No impact would occur. d)No Impact The project proposes a government facility that would allow for the consolidation of separate existing facilities and uses. The project would not introduce any housing and would not increase population growth that would result in a need for additional parks. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for park services that would necessitate new or physically altered facilities. No impact would occur. e)No Impact The project proposes a government facility that would allow for the consolidation of separate existing facilities and uses. The project would not introduce any housing and would not increase population growth that would result in a need for additional libraries or other public facilities. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for library or other public services that would necessitate new or physically altered facilities. No impact would occur. XVI.RECREATION Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ☐☐☐☒ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 106 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -61-Initial Study XVI.RECREATION Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t b)Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐☐☐☒ a)No Impact The project proposes a government facility that would allow for the consolidation of separate existing facilities and uses. The project would not introduce any housing and would not increase population growth. Therefore, the project would not increase use of neighborhood or regional parks, or other such recreational facilities. No impact would occur. b)No Impact The project proposes a government facility that would allow for the consolidation of separate existing facilities and does not include the recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. No impact would occur. XVII.TRANSPORTATION Would the project: Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?☐☐☒☐ b)Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.3, subdivision (b)?☐☐☒☐ c)Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ☐☐☐☒ d)Result in inadequate emergency access?☐☐☐☒ The city’s General Plan Mobility Element promotes a livable streets strategy for mobility within the city. The objective of this strategy is to create a ‘multi-modal’ street network that balances the mobility needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and vehicles. For each street in the city, the General Plan Mobility Element identifies the travel modes for which service levels should be maintained per the multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) standard. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 107 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -62-Initial Study a)Less than Significant Pursuant to Senate Bill 743 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b), VMT is the program for measuring and addressing vehicular circulation system facilities under CEQA. Level of Service is no longer the metric used to evaluate impacts associated with transportation. Potential impacts associated with VMT are evaluated in Section XVII.b) below. Chen Ryan Associates prepared a Local Mobility Assessment (LMA) consistent with the methodologies described in the city’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, April 2018. The LMA is available separately from this IS/MND as a non-CEQA technical study. The LMA included a Growth Management Analysis (GMA) that identified the following features that would improve project design and ensure consistency with the city’s transportation, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit policies: •Provide a secure, weather-protected bike cage or bike room for employees. •Provide public bike racks near the building entrances for all cyclists, including visitors. •Provide signed passenger pick-up and loading curb space for ride-share. •Provide shower and changing rooms for employees who use active transportation to get to work. •Provide preferred parking for car/vanpools and electric vehicles and clean air vehicles. •Pay a fair-share contribution toward left turn lane improvements at the El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue intersection; pay all left-turn lane improvement costs at the Faraday Avenue/Orion Street intersection. Implementation of these features as identified in the LMA would ensure project consistency with the city’s GMP. The city’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and GMP include policies that document the full range of circulation system requirements and improvements (including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities). Therefore, implementation of the design features identified in the TIA would ensure that the project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and impacts would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact Fehr & Peers prepared a VMT Analysis consistent with the methodologies described in the city’s VMT Analysis Guidelines, September 2020 (Appendix J; Fehr & Peers 2022). The project did not meet any of the city’s screening criteria, so it was evaluated based on the net increase in total regional VMT as a regionally serving public facility. The change in employee commute VMT would be the biggest contributing factor the project would have on regional VMT. By relocating employees from their current locations to the new location, each employee’s commute distance would change, with some possibly having shorter commutes and some possibly having longer commutes. A Geospatial analysis was performed to determine the driving distance from the centroid of each zip code to the location where each employee currently works and the distance to the project location. These two sets of distances were used to calculate the difference in commute VMT generated by each employee on making one round-trip for their current work location and for the project location. The project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 108 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -63-Initial Study employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would only redistribute existing trips without adding any new trips to the roadway network. The VMT Analysis evaluated commute patterns for the 143 employees based on the home location and work location of the existing employees. The commute distances (and typical commute route) were determined for the AM commute hour and PM commute hour independently based on congested conditions. Each round-trip is assumed to be made by a single occupant car, such that these average distances are equivalent to vehicle miles traveled. As shown in Table 6, the VMT analysis determined that the total employee-generated VMT under the project would be 72 miles less compared to commutes from the four existing locations. Table 6 Orion Center Typical Weekday VMT Estimates Employee VMT Commuting to Existing Sites Employee VMT Commuting to Project Net Change Number of Employees 143 143 0 Weighted Average VMT per Employee Round-trip 25.42 Miles 24.92 Miles -.50 Mile Total Weekday VMT from Employees 3,635 Miles 3,563 Miles -72 Miles Additionally, the project would further reduce regional VMT compared to the existing condition because the consolidated site would improve the efficiency of operations by reducing/eliminating other types of trips currently occurring between the four existing facilities. For example, the project site currently serves as a vehicle maintenance yard. Therefore, city vehicles needing maintenance are driven from their operations center to the maintenance yard for service. By consolidating all sites in one location, the internal trips between operations centers and the maintenance facility would be eliminated. VMT associated with delivery trips would also benefit from the consolidated project site because a delivery vehicle that currently goes to multiple facilities to drop-off/pick-up items would only go to the consolidated location. However, to provide a conservative analysis, the efficiency of consolidating the facilities from an internal trip and delivery perspective were not accounted for in the VMT analysis presented above. To the extent that the public and customers would come to the new site, some may have shorter trips and some may have longer trips, depending on their home locations. Using the employee home location (and especially those that live and work in Carlsbad) as a proxy for where people live in relation to these sites, the VMT analysis generally expected that the new consolidated location would produce lower VMT for customer trips. The consolidated site would have a larger employee base, which may increase the likelihood of two or more employees living near one another and sharing the same work schedule is increased. Therefore, the project may reduce VMT through an increase in carpooling compared to the existing condition. Furthermore, the new facility would be subject to the TDM Ordinance and would be required to prepare a Tier 3 TDM plan. Compliance with the TDM Ordinance would likely result in additional VMT reduction that has not been accounted for in the VMT analysis presented above. Therefore, the project would reduce VMT compared to the existing condition, and would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.3, subdivision (b). No impact would occur. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 109 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -64-Initial Study c)No Impact Site access to and from the site would be designed and constructed consistent with city safety standards. As described in Section XVII.a) above, the project would pay a fair-share contribution toward left-turn lane improvements at the El Camino Real/Faraday Avenue intersection and pay the entire cost for the left-turn lane improvement costs at the Faraday Avenue/Orion Street intersection. Both of these roadway improvements would be designed and constructed consistent with city safety standards. Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). No impact would occur. d)No Impact The project has been designed to satisfy the emergency requirements of the Fire and Police Departments. Furthermore, the city Fire Marshal has reviewed and approved the project. Therefore, the project would not result in inadequate emergency access. No impact would occur. XVIII.TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t w i t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t I m p a c t No I m p a c t a)Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ☐☒☐☐ b)A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ☐☒☐☐ a)Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated The city initiated consultation with the Native American tribes who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project consistent with the requirements of Assembly Bill 52. The San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (SLRBMI) requested notification of projects for AB 52 consultation from the city on June 22, 2015, for projects in which the city is the lead agency. Accordingly, the city contacted SLRBMI regarding the project on February 4, 2016 and met with SLRBMI on February 10, 2016. After the meeting, SLRBMI requested formal tribal consultation specific to the project in a February 26, 2016 letter. In the letter, SLRBMI requested consultation on the project alternatives, mitigation measures, and significant effects of the project, specifically with regards to tribal cultural resources. In addition, SLRBMI requested they be sent any cultural resources assessments completed as part of the project. The Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians requested AB 52 consultation on May 11, 2016, but did not respond to follow up communication by the city. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 110 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -65-Initial Study Due to the passage of time since the first AB 52 consultation in 2016, the city again initiated AB 52 consultation in May 2021. Notices were sent to the Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians, Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Rincon Band of Mission Indians, and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians. While no replies were received from the first two tribes, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians requested consultation on the project alternatives, mitigation measures, and significant effects of the project, specifically with regards to tribal cultural resources in a June 17, 2021 letter. Consultation with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians concluded on January 4, 2023. The Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians submitted a letter on June 18, 2021, requesting consultation. The tribe also submitted a letter on July 15, 2021 stating that the project would have the potential to impact tribal cultural resources because it is located within a culturally-sensitive area that is associated with the traditional practices of the Luiseño people. Therefore, the project would have the potential to impact a tribal cultural resource eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). This would be considered a significant impact. Implementation of mitigation measures TRC-1 and TRC-2 would reduce this impact to a level less than significant. TCR-1: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring Prior to the commencement of any ground-disturbing activities, the project developer shall: a.Retain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall be on-site for ground-disturbing activities. In the event cultural material is encountered, the archaeologist is empowered to temporarily divert or halt grading to allow for coordination with the Luiseño Native American monitor, or other Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated Luiseño tribe (“TCA Tribe”), and to determine the significance of the discovery. The archaeologist shall follow all standard procedures for cultural materials that are not Tribal Cultural Resources. b.Enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement, with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians or other Luiseño tribe that meets all standard requirements of the tribe for such Agreements. This agreement will address provision of a Luiseño Native American monitor and contain provisions to address the proper treatment of any tribal cultural resources and/or Luiseño Native American human remains inadvertently discovered during the course of the project. The agreement will outline the roles and powers of the Luiseño Native American monitors and the archaeologist and may include the following provisions. In some cases, the language below may be modified in consultation with San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians if special conditions warrant. c.A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, archaeological studies, geotechnical investigations, clearing, grubbing, trenching, excavation, preparation for utilities and other infrastructure, and grading activities. d.Any and all uncovered artifacts of Luiseño Native American cultural importance shall be returned to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians, and/or the Most Likely Descendant, if applicable, and not be curated, unless ordered to do so by a federal agency or a court of competent jurisdiction. e.The Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present at the project’s preconstruction meeting to consult with grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules and safety April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 111 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -66-Initial Study issues, as well as to consult with the archaeologist PI (principal investigator) concerning the proposed archaeologist techniques and/or strategies for the project. f.Luiseño Native American monitors and archaeological monitors shall have joint authority to temporarily divert and/or halt construction activities. If tribal cultural resources are discovered during construction, all earth-moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area must be diverted until the Luiseño Native American monitor and the archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. g.If a significant tribal cultural resource(s) and/or unique archaeological resource(s) are discovered during ground-disturbing activities for this project, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians or other Luiseño tribe shall be notified and consulted regarding the respectful and dignified treatment of those resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and tribal cultural resources. If, however, the Applicant is able to demonstrate that avoidance of a significant and/or unique cultural resource is infeasible and a data recovery plan is authorized by the City of Carlsbad as the lead agency, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians shall be consulted regarding the drafting and finalization of any such recovery plan. h.When tribal cultural resources are discovered during the project, if the archaeologist collects such resources, a Luiseño Native American monitor must be present during any testing or cataloging of those resources. If the archaeologist does not collect the tribal cultural resources that are unearthed during the ground-disturbing activities, the Luiseño Native American monitor may, at their discretion, collect said resources and provide them to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians for dignified and respectful treatment in accordance with their cultural and spiritual traditions. i.If suspected Native American human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b) states that no further disturbance shall occur until the San Diego County Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. Suspected Native American remains shall be examined in the field and kept in a secure location at the site. A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during the examination of the remains. If the San Diego County Medical Examiner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted by the Medical Examiner within 24 hours. The NAHC must then immediately notify the “Most Likely Descendant” about the discovery. The Most Likely Descendant shall then make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultation concerning treatment of remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. j.In the event that fill material is imported into the project area, the fill shall be clean of tribal cultural resources and documented as such. Commercial sources of fill material are already permitted as appropriate and will be culturally sterile. If fill material is to be utilized and/or exported from areas within the project site, then that fill material shall be analyzed and confirmed by an archaeologist and Luiseño Native American monitor that such fill material does not contain tribal cultural resources. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 112 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -67-Initial Study k.No testing, invasive or non-invasive, shall be permitted on any recovered tribal cultural resources without the written permission of the SLRBMI or any other Luiseño Native American consulting tribe. TCR-2: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and/or Evaluation Report Prior to the completion of project construction, a monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the monitoring program shall be submitted by the Project Archaeologist, along with the Luiseño Native American monitor’s notes and comments, to the City of Carlsbad for approval, and shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center. Said report shall be subject to confidentiality as an exception to the Public Records Act and will not be available for public distribution. b)Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated As described in Section XVIII above, the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians stated that the project would have the potential to impact tribal cultural resources because it is located within a culturally-sensitive area that is associated with the traditional practices of the Luiseño people. Therefore, the project would have the potential to impact a tribal cultural resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. This would be considered a significant impact. Implementation of mitigation measures TRC-1 and TRC-2 described above would reduce this impact to a level less than significant. XIX.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which would cause significant environmental effects? ☐☐☐☒ b)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?☐☐☐☒ c)Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? ☐☐☐☒ d)Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?☐☐☒☐ e)Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?☐☐☒☐ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 113 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -68-Initial Study a)No Impact The project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would not increase the number of employees utilizing utility services. Additionally, consolidation of these facilities into one location would result in service efficiencies through use of one connection point and utilization of improved conservation techniques compared to the existing facilities constructed in previous decades. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the city’s planned land uses for the project site, and thereby would be consistent with demand projections that have been developed by utility providers that serve the city. Existing CMWD water and wastewater facilities are available to serve the project. Similarly, existing SDG&E facilities are available to provide electrical and natural gas services, and existing AT&T facilities are available to provide telecommunication services. As described in Section X.c.ii) above, the proposed stormwater management system would be sufficiently sized to safely store the increased runoff volume without discharging additional runoff that would exceed the capacity of the existing storm drain system. Consequently, the project would not require the construction of additional storm water drainage facilities. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. No impact would occur. b)No Impact As described in Section XIX.a) above, the project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have the same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would not increase the number of employees consuming water. Additionally, consolidation of these facilities into one location would result in service efficiencies through use of one connection point and utilization of improved conservation techniques compared to the existing facilities constructed in previous decades. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the city’s planned land uses for the project site, and thereby would be consistent with the water demand projections that have been developed by CMWD. The project does not exceed criteria outlined in Water Code Sections 10910(b) and 10912(b and c) and, thus, is not required to prepare a separate SB 610 water supply assessment. Therefore, sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years. No impact would occur. c)No Impact As described in Section XIX.a) above, the project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would not increase the number of employees that would require wastewater services. Additionally, consolidation of these facilities into one location would result in service efficiencies through use of one connection point and utilization of improved conservation techniques compared to the existing facilities constructed in previous decades. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the city’s planned land uses for the project site, and thereby would be consistent with the wastewater demand projections that have been developed by CMWD. Therefore, the project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. No impact would occur. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 114 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -69-Initial Study d)Less than Significant Impact The city provides solid waste hauling services via a contract with Waste Management of North County. Solid waste is collected by Waste Management and transported to the Sycamore and Otay landfills for disposal. Table 7 presents the remaining capacity for the Sycamore and Otay landfills. Demolition of existing facilities onsite and project construction would generate waste requiring disposal. However, demolition and construction would be subject to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), which requires that at least 50 percent of waste produced is recycled, reduced, or composted. Due to the substantial existing capacity of the Sycamore and Otay landfills and requirement to divert at least 50 percent of all construction waste, project construction would not exceed existing landfill capacity. Table 7 Remaining Landfill Capacity Landfill/Location Daily Permitted Capacity/Tons Per Day (TPD) Maximum Permitted Capacity Remaining Capacity Percent Remaining Capacity Sycamore Landfill, San Diego 5,000 TPD 147,908,000 CY 113,972,637 CY 77.1% Otay Landfill, Chula Vista 6,700 TPD 61,154,000 CY 21,194,008 CY 34.7% As described in Section XIX.a) above, the project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location. Therefore, the project would have same number of employees as the total of the existing four operations centers (143) and would not increase the number of employees that would generate solid waste. Additionally, consolidation of these facilities in one location would result in a reduction in overall waste generation through increased efficiency of operations and the replacement of multiple outdated facilities with a consolidated facility built to LEED standards. Furthermore, project operation would comply with the AB 939 requirements to divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste. Therefore, the project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, and impacts would be less than significant. e)Less than Significant Impact As described in Section XIX.d) above, the project would comply with the AB 939 requirements to divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste. Furthermore, the project would be designed consistent with the requirements of the Green Building Code. Therefore, the project would comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and impacts would be less than significant. XX.WILDFIRE If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?☐☐☒☐ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 115 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -70-Initial Study XX.WILDFIRE If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t b)Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? ☐☐☒☐ c)Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? ☐☐☐☒ d)Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐☐☒☐ a)Less than Significant Impact The project site is immediately adjacent to the city’s Public Safety Center to the southeast, and the Safety Training Center to the south. Additionally, city Fire Station 5 is immediately south of the Safety Training Center. Project operation would not result in substantial changes to circulation patterns for proximate roads such as Orion Way, Orion Street, or Impala Drive and thus would not impede emergency response via these roads. Additionally, construction staging areas would be confined to the project site and would not impede circulation on these roads. In the event of an emergency, ingress and egress from the project site would typically be to the south or west via Orion Way, Orion Street, or Impala Drive. Current features that impede ingress and egress include a chain-link fence that secures the fleet parking area. The project would expand the secured parking area by moving the fence further south; however, this would not reduce the number or quality of ingress and egress routes from the site. The project would discontinue an existing informal access point into Carlsbad Oaks North County Preserve from the western fleet yard. This access point is not considered to have substantial value as an ingress or egress route. Other than these changes, the project would result in limited change to ingress and egress routes from the site. Therefore, impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans would be less than significant. b)Less than Significant Impact Review of Figure 6-10 of the city’s Public Safety Element determined that the project site is located within an area designated by the city as Very High FHSZ. However, the project would not extend beyond the existing chain link fence that separates the currently developed area from undeveloped lands within the North County MSCP Preserve Area. Therefore, the project would not exacerbate fire risk compared to the existing condition. Carlsbad Fire Station 5 is located immediately southwest of the project site and would be able to provide fire protection services in the event of a wildfire. Additionally, the project has been designed to include the latest ignition resistant building materials and all structures would include interior sprinklers consistent with Carlsbad Fire and Building Code. This would result in facilities that are less susceptible to fire than currently exist on-site. The project has also been designed consistent with Carlsbad April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 116 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -71-Initial Study Fire and Building Code setback requirements to minimize fire risk, and project landscaping would be consistent with the requirements of the city’s adopted Landscape Manual as it relates to fire protection. Furthermore, the city Fire Marshal has reviewed and approved the project. Therefore, the project would not exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, and impacts would be less than significant. c)No Impact As described in Section XIX.a) above, the project would not require construction of new utility infrastructure or expansion of existing facilities. Therefore, the project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk. No impact would occur. d)Less than Significant Impact As described in Section X.c.ii) above, the project would reduce peak flows during the 50-year storm event. As described in Section X.d) above, the project site is not located within an area designated by the city as a 100 Year Flood –High Risk Coastal Area or 100-Year Flood High Risk Area, nor is it located within an area designated by the city as Dam Inundation Area. As described in section VII.a.iv) above, the Updated Geotechnical Investigation did not identify any evidence of landslides or slope instabilities. Consequently, the potential for landslides or slope instability is considered low. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structure to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes, and impacts would be less than significant. XXI.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Would the project:Po t e n t i a l l y Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t Le s s t h a n S i g n i f i c a n t wi t h Mi t i g a t i o n In c o r p o r a t e d Le s s t h a n Si g n i f i c a n t Im p a c t No I m p a c t a)Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ☐☒☐☐ b)Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ☐☒☐☐ c)Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?☐☐☒☐ April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 117 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -72-Initial Study a)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As described in Section IV.a), implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-2 would reduce impacts to coastal California gnatcatcher and raptors and nesting birds to a level less than significant, respectively. As described in Section VII.f), implementation of mitigation measure PAL-1 would reduce impacts to paleontological resources to a level less than significant. As described in Section XVIII.a) and b), implementation of mitigation measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce impacts associated with tribal cultural resources to a level less than significant. Therefore, potential impacts to sensitive habitat, sensitive species, and important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory would be mitigated to a level than significant. b)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As described in the Draft IS/MND, all impacts would be mitigated to a level less than significant. Air quality is a regional issue and the cumulative study area for air quality impacts encompasses the SDAB as a whole. Therefore, the cumulative analysis addresses regional air quality plans and policies, such as the RAQS, as well as the project’s contribution to a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the SDAB is listed as a non-attainment area. As described in Section III.a), The project is within the scope of development that was anticipated in the SANDAG growth projections and Carlsbad’s General Plan in 2016 used to develop the RAQS and SIP. Operation of the project would result in emissions that were considered as a part of the RAQS growth projections. As such, the project is not anticipated to conflict with either the RAQS or the SIP. Additionally, operational emissions would not exceed the screening levels, and subsequently would not violate ambient air quality standards. Consequently, the project would not result in an increase in emissions that are not already accounted for in the RAQS. As described in Section IV.a), implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-2 would reduce impacts to Coastal California Gnatcatcher and raptors and nesting birds to a level less than significant, respectively. As described in Section IV.f), the project would not conflict with the city’s HMP or the North County MHCP, which is a regional planning document that seeks to preserve biological resources. Projects that comply with the HMP or North County MHCP would not result in a significant cumulative impact for biological resources. As described in Section VII.d), implementation of Mitigation measure GEO-1 would reduce impacts associated with expansive soils to a level less than significant, thereby avoiding any cumulative impacts associated with Geology and Soils. As described in Section VIII.b), the project would not conflict with the applicable plans developed to reduce GHG emissions at the regional level. As described in Section IX.d), implementation of mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would reduce impacts associated with existing soils contamination to a level less than significant, thereby avoiding any cumulative impacts associated with Hazards and Hazardous Materials. As described in Section XVIII.a and b), implementation of mitigation measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce impacts associated with tribal cultural resources to a level less than significant, thereby avoiding any cumulative impacts. As described in Section XIX.a), the project would centralize various maintenance and operations centers throughout the city and move all employees to the new consolidated location and would not increase the number of employees utilizing utility services. Additionally, the project would result in service efficiencies through use of one connection point and utilization of improved conservation techniques compared to the existing facilities constructed in previous decades. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the city’s planned land uses for the project site, and thereby would be consistent with demand projections that have been developed by utility providers that serve the city. Therefore, the project would not result in cumulative impacts related to utilities and service systems. All other project impacts were determined to be less than significant, and due to the limited scope of the project, would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 118 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -73-Initial Study c)Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As described in Section VII.d), implementation of mitigation measure GEO-1 would reduce impacts associated with expansive soils to a level less than significant. As described in Section IX.d), implementation of mitigation measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 would reduce impacts associated with existing soils contamination to a level less than significant. Therefore, potential impacts that may have a substantial adverse effects on human beings would be mitigated to a level less than significant. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 119 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -74-Initial Study XXII.EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15063(c)(3)(D)). In such cases, a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a)Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b)Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c)Mitigation measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. XXIII.EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Division located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1.Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan and Climate Action Plan (SCH #2011011004), June 2015. 2.Carlsbad Climate Action Plan, September 2015, Revised May 2020. 3.Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Ordinances CS-347, CS-348, CS-349, and CS-350, adopted March 12, 2019. 4.City of Carlsbad. Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines. September 2017. 5.City of Carlsbad Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the Climate Action Plan, Form P-31, July 2020. 6.Carlsbad General Plan, September 2015. 7.City of Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC), Title 21 Zoning. 8.City of Carlsbad Transportation Demand Management Handbook, August 2019. 9.City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, April 2018. 10.Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad (HMP), November 2004. 11.San Diego Regional Airport Authority/San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission. McClellan- Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. December 2021. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 120 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -75-Initial Study XXIV.APPENDICES A: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Letter Report B: Biological Resources Report C: Cultural Impact Analysis D: Updated Geotechnical Investigation E: Paleontological Resource Assessment F: Federal Aviation Administration Feasibility Report G: Storm Water Quality Management Plan H Preliminary Hydrology Report I: Noise Letter Report J: VMT Analysis XXV.REFERENCES Beier, P. and S. Loe 1992 A Checklist for Evaluating Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:434-440. WSP 2022a Storm Water Quality Management Plan for City of Carlsbad Maintenance & Operations Center. July 15. 2022b Preliminary Hydrology Report for City of Carlsbad Maintenance & Operations Center. July 15. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 2008 CEQA & Climate Change, Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. January. 2013 California Emissions Estimator model (CalEEMod) User’s Guide Version 2013.2.2. September. California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2005 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April. 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. December. California Public Utilities Commission 2021 2021 California Renewables Portfolio Standard Annual Report. November 2021. Carlsbad, City of 1988 Scenic Corridor Guidelines. July. 2004 Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad. November. 2008 Guidelines for Biological Studies. 2015 City of Carlsbad General Plan. September. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 121 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -76-Initial Study 2017 Carlsbad Tribal, Cultural, and Paleontological Resources Guidelines 2018 Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, April. 2019 Transportation Demand Management Handbook, August. 2020 Carlsbad Climate Action Plan. May. Federal Highway Administration 2011 Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance. December. Fehr & Peers 2022 Orion Center Operations and Maintenance Facility SB 743 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis. October 21. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 2008 Trip Generation Handbook, 8th Edition. RECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON) 2022a Carlsbad Maintenance and Operations Facility Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Project Number EIA-15-02). November. 2022b Biological Resources Report for the City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project, Carlsbad, California (Project Number EIA-15-02). November. 2022c Orion Center Project Cultural Resources Records Search (Project Number EIA-15-02). November. 2022d Carlsbad Maintenance and Operations Facility Noise Analysis (Project Number EIA-15-02). November. San Diego, County of 2017 Five-Year Review Report of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Department of Public Works. August. San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) 2009 Regional Air Quality Strategy Revision. April. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 2003 Final Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan. March. San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (SDCRAA) 2011 McClellan-Palomar Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. December. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 122 of 159 Project Name: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project Project No: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB 17Y-0018) January 2023 -77-Initial Study San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) 2020 San Diego Gas and Electric Company (U 902 E) Final 2019 Renewables Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan. Public Versions. January 29. San Diego Natural History Museum (SDNHM) 2021 Paleontological Resource Assessment, Orion Center. November 29. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) 2009 Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December. SCST 2019 Update Geotechnical Investigation, City of Carlsbad Orion Center. March 28. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Board Meeting Date December 5, 2008. Agenda No. 31. December. State of California, Department of Conservation 2016 California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 123 of 159 Attachment B Community Development Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue  Carlsbad, CA 92008  760-602-4600  760-602-8560 fax MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND REPORTING PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: City of Carlsbad Orion Center Project PROJECT NO: CUP 2018-0022 (PUB17Y-0018) PROJECT LOCATION: 2600 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA Section 21081.6 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that a Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) be adopted upon certification of an EIR or adoption of a MND to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented. The MMRP specifies the mitigation for the project, when in the process it should be accomplished, and the entity responsible for implementing and/or monitoring the mitigation. Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires monitoring of only those impacts identified as significant or potentially significant. After analysis, potentially significant impacts requiring mitigation were identified for biological resources and tribal cultural resources. The MMRP is presented in the table below. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 124 of 159 C cityof Carlsbad Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials Biological Resources BIO-1: Mitigation for Impacts to Coastal California Gnatcatcher The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as construction occur during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season (February 15 through August 15) within 500 feet of potential coastal California gnatcatcher breeding habitat (i.e., coastal sage scrub): • A qualified biologist will conduct a single pre- construction survey in appropriate habitat within 500 feet of project activities no more than 3 days before the start of construction. If coastal California gnatcatcher is not identified, then no further species-specific mitigation would be required. If coastal California gnatcatcher is identified during the survey, the following additional mitigation measures would be required during the coastal California gnatcatcher breeding season: • The City will be notified immediately if coastal California gnatcatcher or other listed species is located during the pre-construction survey. • Fencing or other measures will be installed within a buffer of at least 500 feet from active nests. No work would be conducted within the buffer until the nest is no longer active or noise attenuation measures can be implemented to ensure that construction noise would not impact nesting success (see following measure). • During the breeding season, construction noise will be measured regularly to maintain a threshold at or below 60 A-weighted decibels hourly average noise level [dB(A) Leq] within 500 feet of breeding habitat occupied by the coastal California gnatcatcher. If noise levels supersede the threshold, the construction array will be changed or noise attenuation measures will be implemented (City of Carlsbad 2008). Prior to Construction Applicant/ Qualified Biologist BIO-2: Mitigation for Impacts to Raptors and Nesting Birds The following mitigation measures would be required should activities such as vegetation removal or grading occur during the general bird breeding season (February 15 through August 31), which includes Cooper’s hawk and southern California rufous- crowned sparrow: • A qualified biologist will conduct a survey for active nests within appropriate habitat for nesting raptors and birds in the project site as well as an additional 500-foot survey buffer within three days of vegetation removal or construction. • If nests of federally or state listed birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are located, a protective buffer will be established around the nest by a qualified biologist. Buffer width for raptors and listed species will be 500 feet. Buffer width for other nesting species will be determined by a qualified biologist on a case by case basis. All construction activity will be prohibited within Prior to Construction Applicant/ Qualified Biologist April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 125 of 159 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials this area until the young have successfully fledged and the nest is no longer active. Geology and Soils GEO-1: Geotechnical Recommendations The project would be required to implement the geotechnical recommendations presented in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation. These include, but are not limited to, recommendations related to potentially compressible fill, cut/fill transitions, expansive soils, and difficult excavations. The geotechnical engineer should review project plans and specifications prior to bidding and construction to check that the intent of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation have been incorporated. Observations and tests should be performed during construction. If the conditions encountered during construction differ from those anticipated based on the subsurface exploration program, the presence of the geotechnical engineer during construction would enable an evaluation of the exposed conditions and modifications of the recommendations in the Updated Geotechnical Investigation or development of additional recommendations in a timely manner. During Construction Applicant/ Qualified Geologist PAL-1: Paleontological Resources Monitoring Implementation of a paleontological mitigation program, in the form of paleontological monitoring, is recommended for earthwork at the project site that will directly impact previously undisturbed strata mapped as the Lusardi Formation (or unmapped strata of the Point Loma Formation, if present). The paleontological mitigation program would include the following measures: a. Pre-construction (personnel and repository): Prior to the commencement of construction, a qualified Principal Paleontologist shall be retained to oversee the mitigation program. The City defines a Principal Paleontologist as a person with a graduate degree in paleontology, geology, or related field, and who has at least one year of prior experience as a principal investigator. In addition, a regional fossil repository shall be designated to receive any discovered fossils. Because the project is in San Diego County, the recommended repository is the San Diego Natural History Museum. b. Pre-construction (meeting): The Principal Paleontologist should attend the pre-construction meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules, paleontological field techniques, and safety issues. c. Pre-construction (training): The Principal Paleontologist shall conduct a paleontological resource contractor awareness training workshop to be attended by earth excavation personnel. d. During construction (monitoring): A paleontological monitor (working under the direction of the Principal Paleontologist) should be on-site on a full-time basis during all original cutting of previously undisturbed Prior to, and during, Construction Applicant/ Qualified Paleontologist April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 126 of 159 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials deposits mapped as the Lusardi Formation (moderate paleontological potential) and/or Point Loma Formation (high paleontological potential) to inspect exposures for unearthed fossils. Monitoring is recommended during earthwork that exceeds the depth of fill in the vicinity of the proposed general services building and general services warehouse/shop (southern portion of the site), which ranges from 2 to 11.5 feet thick, and during earthwork extending at least 1 foot below existing grade elsewhere within the site, including for the proposed parking structure (eastern portion of the site). e. During construction (fossil recovery): If fossils are discovered, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them. Bulk sedimentary matrix samples may also be collected for stratigraphic horizons that appear likely to contain microscopic fossil remains. In most cases, this fossil salvage can be completed in a short period of time. However, some fossil specimens (e.g., a bone bed or a complete large skeleton) may require an extended salvage period. In these instances, the Principal Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) has the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely manner. f. Post-construction (treatment): Fossil remains collected during monitoring and salvage should be prepared (including washing of sediments to recover microfossils), repaired, sorted, and cataloged as part of the mitigation program. g. Post-construction (curation): Prepared fossils, along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photos, and maps, should be deposited (as a donation) in the designated fossil repository. Donation of the fossils shall be accompanied by financial support for initial specimen storage. h. Post-construction (final report): A final summary paleontological mitigation report should be completed that outlines the results of the mitigation program. This report should include discussions of the methods used, stratigraphic section(s) exposed, fossils collected, inventory lists of catalogued fossils, and significance of recovered fossils. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment The City will retain a qualified environmental professional to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) consistent with ASTM standards to ascertain the extent of soils contamination. The City will subsequently consult with County DEH to determine appropriate measures to avoid or minimize health risk associated with soils contamination. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA and recommendations of the County DEH, subsequent investigations such as additional soils sampling or health risk assessment and remediation measures such as soils Prior to, and during, Construction Applicant/ Qualified Hazardous Materials Environmental Professional April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 127 of 159 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials extraction, including soils extraction, groundwater pumping and treatment, or soil vapor extraction, may be required. Upon completion of soils investigations and any necessary remediation and prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer will review and approve a Construction Plan that avoids or minimizes health risks associated with soils contamination. HAZ-2: Soils Disposal Prior to soils investigations outlined in mitigation measure HAZ-1, The City will verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that any soils extracted from the project site including, but not limited to soils extraction for activities such as borings or samplings will be transported and disposed of consistent with State Administrative Manual (SAM) procedures for hazardous materials. Consistent with subsequent recommendations by the environmental professional performing the Phase II ESA required under HAZ-1 and County DEH, the City will also verify through contract obligations, transportation manifests, disposal receipts, or applicable other means that potentially contaminated soils extracted during soils investigations or soils remediation are transported and disposed of consistent with SAM procedures for hazardous materials. Prior to Construction Applicant/ Qualified Hazardous Materials Environmental Professional Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activities, the project developer shall: a. Retain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall be on-site for ground-disturbing activities. In the event cultural material is encountered, the archaeologist is empowered to temporarily divert or halt grading to allow for coordination with the Luiseño Native American monitor, or other Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated Luiseño tribe (“TCA Tribe”), and to determine the significance of the discovery. The archaeologist shall follow all standard procedures for cultural materials that are not Tribal Cultural Resources. b. Enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement, with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (SLRBMI) or other Luiseño tribe that meets all standard requirements of the tribe for such Agreements. This agreement will address provision of a Luiseño Native American monitor and contain provisions to address the proper treatment of any tribal cultural resources and/or Luiseño Native American human remains inadvertently discovered during the course of the project. The agreement will outline the roles and powers of the Luiseño Native American monitors and the archaeologist and may include the following provisions. In some cases, the language below may be modified in consultation with San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians if special conditions warrant. c. A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during all ground-disturbing activities. Ground- Prior to, and during, Construction Applicant/ Qualified Archaeologist April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 128 of 159 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, archaeological studies, geotechnical investigations, clearing, grubbing, trenching, excavation, preparation for utilities and other infrastructure, and grading activities. d. Any and all uncovered artifacts of Luiseño Native American cultural importance shall be returned to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians, and/or the Most Likely Descendant, if applicable, and not be curated, unless ordered to do so by a federal agency or a court of competent jurisdiction. e. The Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present at the project’s preconstruction meeting to consult with grading and excavation contractors concerning excavation schedules and safety issues, as well as to consult with the archaeologist PI (principal investigator) concerning the proposed archaeologist techniques and/or strategies for the project. f. Luiseño Native American monitors and archaeological monitors shall have joint authority to temporarily divert and/or halt construction activities. If tribal cultural resources are discovered during construction, all earth- moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area must be diverted until the Luiseño Native American monitor and the archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. g. If a significant tribal cultural resource(s) and/or unique archaeological resource(s) are discovered during ground-disturbing activities for this project, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians or other Luiseño tribe shall be notified and consulted regarding the respectful and dignified treatment of those resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and tribal cultural resources. If, however, the Applicant is able to demonstrate that avoidance of a significant and/or unique cultural resource is infeasible and a data recovery plan is authorized by the City of Carlsbad as the lead agency, the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians shall be consulted regarding the drafting and finalization of any such recovery plan. h. When tribal cultural resources are discovered during the project, if the archaeologist collects such resources, a Luiseño Native American monitor must be present during any testing or cataloging of those resources. If the archaeologist does not collect the tribal cultural resources that are unearthed during the ground-disturbing activities, the Luiseño Native American monitor may, at their discretion, collect said resources and provide them to the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians for dignified and respectful treatment in accordance with their cultural and spiritual traditions. April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 129 of 159 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Status/Date/ Initials i. If suspected Native American human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b) states that no further disturbance shall occur until the San Diego County Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. Suspected Native American remains shall be examined in the field and kept in a secure location at the site. A Luiseño Native American monitor shall be present during the examination of the remains. If the San Diego County Medical Examiner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted by the Medical Examiner within 24 hours. The NAHC must then immediately notify the “Most Likely Descendant” about the discovery. The Most Likely Descendant shall then make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultation concerning treatment of remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. j. In the event that fill material is imported into the project area, the fill shall be clean of tribal cultural resources and documented as such. Commercial sources of fill material are already permitted as appropriate and will be culturally sterile. If fill material is to be utilized and/or exported from areas within the project site, then that fill material shall be analyzed and confirmed by an archaeologist and Luiseño Native American monitor that such fill material does not contain tribal cultural resources. k. No testing, invasive or non-invasive, shall be permitted on any recovered tribal cultural resources without the written permission of the SLRBMI or any other Luiseño Native American consulting tribe. TCR-2: Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and/or Evaluation Report Prior to the completion of project construction, a monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the monitoring program shall be submitted by the Project Archaeologist, along with the Luiseño Native American monitor’s notes and comments, to the City of Carlsbad for approval, and shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center. Said report shall be subject to confidentiality as an exception to the Public Records Act and will not be available for public distribution. During Construction Applicant/ Qualified Archaeologist April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 130 of 159 Table 3.1 Proposed Project Trip Generation Land Use Quantity Trip Rate Daily Trips AM PM %Trips %Trips Office 41,900 20 / ksf 838 14% 118 (106-in / 12-out)13%109 (22-in / 87-out) Industrial Park 26,330 8 / ksf 211 11% 24 (22-in / 2-out)12%26 (5-in / 21-out) Storage 35,280 2 / ksf 71 6% 5 (3-in / 2-out)9%7 (4-in / 3-out) Vehicle Maintenance Facility Existing Facility Fueling Station Existing Facility Net Total 1,120 -147 (131-in / 16-out) 142 (31-in / 111-out) Source: CR Associates, December 2021. Note: KSF = thousand square feet. 29 Exhibit 6 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 131 of 159 VICINITY MAP PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD 1-5 c------4%.2600 ORION WAY, MCCELLAN PALOMAR AIRPORT PROJECT SITE VICINITY NTS CARLSB CA 92008 MAP~ I SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT IS A NEW MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S OPERATIONS SITE. THE PROJECT INCLUDES SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PARKING, GRADING, LANDSCAPING, AND INCLUDES A NEW 41,900 SF 2-STORY OPERATIONS BUILDING, WAREHOUSE STORAGE BUILDINGS, SHOP FACILITIES, PARKING STRUCTURE, OUTDOOR STORAGE SHADE CANOPIES, NEW VEHICLE WASH STATION, PARKING FOR OPERATIONAL AND STAFF VEHICLES, POLICE SUPPORT STORAGE, AND OPERATIONAL OUTDOOR STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROJECT TEAM CLIENT THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ATTN: STEVEN STEWART 1635 FARADAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 T. (760) 602-7543 ARCHITECT ROESLING NAKAMURA ARCHITECTS, INC. ATTN: RICK ESPANA, PROJECT MANAGER 363 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 202 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 T. (619) 233-1023 CIVIL ENGINEER BERGERABAM, INC. ATTN: MIKE MAGEE, P.E. PROJECT MGR. 10525 VISTA SORRENTO PKWY. STE. 350 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92121 T. (858) 500-4500 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, ATTN: MITCH PHILLIPPE, PRESIDENT 2970 5TH AVE. STE. 240 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92103 T. (619) 294-8484 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER MWE ENGINEERING, INC. ATTN: MICHAEL E. WALL, P.E. 4115 SORRENTO VALLEY BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 T. (858) 638-0600 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS RECON ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. INC. ATTN: ROBERT MACALLER, PRESIDENT 1927 FIFTH AVENUE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 T. (619) 308-9333 APPLICABLE STANDARDS CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THE TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (C.C.R.). 2019 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART 1, TITLE 24, C.C.R.; 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24, C.C.R.; 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) PART 3, TITLE 24, C.C.R.; 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC), PART 9, TITLE 24, C.C.R.; 2019 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, PART 12, TITLE 24, C.C.R.; 2019 TITLE 19, C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHAL REGULATIONS REFERENCE CODE SECTION FOR NFPA STANDARDS -2019 CBC (SFM) 3504.1 AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT TII AND TIii ADAAG AS PUBLISHED IN APPENDIX A OF 28 CFR PART 36 GREENBOOK -STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (CURRENT EDITION) INCLUDES: ALL APPLICABLE SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENTS .. CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD DRAWINGS, DOCUMENT NO. AEC701042, REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS (CURRENT EDITION) MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORK ZONES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DOCUMENT NO. 769744. OWNER: PARCEL NO.: SITE ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZONING: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: TOTAL SITE AREA: TOTAL LOT AREA: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: TOTAL BLDG. COVERAGE: LANDSCAPE % AREA: PROVIDED EMPLOYEE EA TING AREA: OPEN/REC. SPACE: UNDEVELOPED AREA: DISTRICT SERVICE: SETBACKS: MAX. HEIGHT: PARKING: TOTAL DISTURBED: EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: EXISTING 0100 (cfs): PROPOSED 0100 (cfs): CITY OF CARLBAD ORION CENTER 2600 ORION WAY, CARLSBAD CA 92008 CITY OF CARLSBAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL, SEPTEMBER 09, 2022 PROJECT DATA THE CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 FARADAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 (706) 602-7543 ATTN: STEVEN STEWART 209-050-26-00 2600 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PORTION OF LOT B OF AQUA HEDIONDA, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 823 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. OS, OPEN SPACE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL NORTH PARCEL: 326,570 S.F. / 7.50 AC 26.3 AC 175,810 S.F. 84,810 S.F. 43,087 S.F. / 13% of PROJECT AREA INDOOR= 3,100 S.F. OUTDOOR= 1,120 S.F. TOTAL= 4,220 S.F. 13,800 S.F. 76,000 S.F. CITY OF CARLSBAD MIN. FRONT: NONE STD. FRONT: NONE MIN. SIDE: NONE MIN. SIDE ST.: NONE STD. SIDE ST.: NONE MIN. REAR: NONE STD. REAR: NONE BUILDING: 399' -0" PARKING STRUCTURE: 422'9" REQUIRED: 466 PROVIDED: 478 293,000 SF CUT: 4,440 CY FILL: 6,918 CY IMPORT: 2,478 CY 40.53 41.25 PROJECT ELEVATION RENDERING SHEET INDEX GENERAL COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES T-1.0 T-2.0 T-3.0 T-4.0 CODE ANALYSIS & FIRE TRUCK ACCESS PLAN SITE TOPO SURVEY CIVIL C1.0 C1.1 C1.2 C2.0 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C3.0 C5.0 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN OVERALL GRADING PLAN GRADING PLAN GRADING PLAN ENLARGED GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLAN DETAIL PLAN LANDSCAPE L1.0 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN L1.1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN L1 .2 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT LEGEND L2.0 CONCEPTUAL WATER CONSERVATION PLAN L2.1 POTABLE & RECYCLED WATER USE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL AS-1.0 AS-1.1 A-1.0 A-1.1 A-1.2 A-2.0 A-2.1 A-2.2 A-2.3 A-4.0 A-4.1 SITE PLAN SITE SECTION FLOOR PLAN -FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -SECOND LEVEL ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -OFFICE BLDG. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -OFFICE BLDG. PARKING STRUCTURE FLOOR PLAN PARKING STRUCTURE FLOOR PLAN CARWASH DRAWINGS CANOPY DRAWINGS AND WAREHOUSE AND WAREHOUSE TRIP GENERATION TABLE & ROADWAY ANALYSIS TABLE 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 D < C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619,233D016 www.RNTarchitects.com T-1.0 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COVER SHEET :: 1 v UICJl-.ll-! RCl lXI 'IRl' I )P. I INI A.I :,A. II PE/IS 01\ DESCRll'TIQI\I ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.i\.'.NII\G 1,0. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 07/15/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 2 2929 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 132 of 159 GENERAL NOTES 1. THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED AS PART OF THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THAT ALL WORKMANSHIP, MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES IN THE AREA TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITY LINES, SERVICE LINES TO REMAIN WHICH ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEAL TH ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS. 7. DO NOT SCALE ANY DRAWINGS IN THIS SET. 8. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE SHOWN ON PLANS, SECTIONS AND DETAILS. SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS. 9. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE MATERIAL NOTES AND DRAWINGS. 10. ALL OMISSIONS AND CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE WORKING DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK SO INVOLVED. NO CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE UNLESS THE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER ARE NOTIFIED IN WRITING AND APPROVE SUCH A CHANGE ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT. 11. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT OR ANY OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. 12. PROVIDE BACKING AT ALL INDICATED FIXTURES, TOILET ACCESSORIES, SIGNS, HANDRAILS, ETC. LOCATIONS. 13. DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SPREAD OUT IF PLACED ON FRAMED FLOORS OR ROOF. THE LOAD SHALL NOT EXCEED THE DESIGN LIVE LOADS FOR EACH PARTICULAR LEVEL. 14. TRADE NAMES AND MANUFACTURERS REFERRED TO ARE FOR QUALITY STANDARDS ONLY. SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE PERMITTED AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER, AND THE ARCHITECT ONLY UPON SUBMITTALS, AND FOR A LIMITED PERIOD. 15. ITEMS SHOWN AS N.1.C. ON PLANS MAY REQUIRE SEPARATE SUBMITTALS, APPROVALS AND PERMITS. INSTALLING CONTRACTOR(S) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS FOR SUCH ITEMS. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY MINIMUM 2% SITE DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE INLETS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL FLOOR FINISH MATERIALS WILL BE FLUSH WITH ADJACENT WALKING SURFACES, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL FINISH MATERIALS BE FLUSH WHERE NEW FINISH SURFACE MATERIAL JOIN EXISTING TO PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION. 19. SAFETY GLAZING IN HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS SUCH AS GLASS DOORS, GLAZING ADJACENT TO SUCH DOORS AND GLAZING ADJACENT TO WALKWAY SURFACES TO COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 2406 AND 2406.4.6 C.B.C., APPLICABLE EDITION. 20. GRADING PLANS, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, ROAD AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL ORDINANCES. 21. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR). 22. TACTILE EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE REQUIRED PER CBC 1003.2.8.6.1. 23. PROVIDE A CLASS "A" ROOF COVERING AT ALL BUILDINGS PER TABLE 15A. 24. CLASS I, II AND Ill-A LIQUIDS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OR STORED IN ANY OF GROUP "A" OCCUPANCY (CBC SECTION 303.8). 25. NO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT EXCEED THE QUANTITIES LISTED IN UBC TABLES 3D & 3E WILL BE STORED AND OR USED WITHIN BUILDINGS. 26. IF A PORTABLE AUDIO SYSTEM IS USED, PORTABLE LISTENING DEVICES MUST BE PROVIDED PER CBC, SECTION 1104B. 27. PATH OF TRAVEL (P.O.T.) AS INDICATED IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESS WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1 /2" AT 1: 2 MAXIMUM SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGES DO NOT EXCEED 1/4" VERTICAL. MAXIMUM CROSS-SLOPE 2% TYPICAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL BARRIERS ON THE INDICATED PATH OF TRAVEL HAVE BEEN REMOVED. 28. CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE MADE BY AN ADDENDUM OR A CHANGE ORDER APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. FIRE PROTECTION NOTES 1. FIRE DEPARTMENT FINAL INSPECTION RECOMMENDED. SCHEDULE ALL INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 2. ALL EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. NO DEAD BOLTS, NO SLIDING BOLTS, ETC. 3. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES. MANUAL PULL STATIONS SHALL BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED. CBC SECTION 305.9. 4. INTERIOR FINISHES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 8, CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2010 EDITION. 5. ALL DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A FLAME-RETARDANT CONDITION. (C.C.R. T-19, SEC. 1.14, 3.08, 3.21, AND C.F.C. SEC. 1103.3.3). 6. THE CONSTRUCTION, REMODEL, OR DEMOLITION OF A BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH C.F.C. ARTICLE 87. 7. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL COMPLY WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANTS. 8. WHEN SERVING MORE THAN 100 SPRINKLER HEADS, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY AN APPROVED CENTRAL, PROPRIETARY OR REMOTE, STATION SERVICE, OR SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A LOCAL ALARM WHICH WILL GIVE AN AUDIBLE SIGNAL AT A CONSTANTLY ATTENDED LOCATION PER SECTION 904.3. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER FIRE TRUCK ACCESS AND FIRE EXITS DURING CONSTRUCTION AT ALL TIMES. 10. PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RESISTIVE WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF CEILINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED IN CBC SECTIONS 709 AND 710. 11. AUDIBLE AND VISUAL ALARMS WILL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72G. 12. WALL AND CEILING MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE FLAME SPREAD CLASSIFICATIONS IN CBC TABLE 8-B. 13. FOAM PLASTICS SHALL NOT BE USED AS INTERIOR FINISH EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2602. 14. MANUAL FIRE ALARM BOXES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR GROUP-A OCCUPANCIES WHERE THE BUILDING SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 AND THE OCCUPANT NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES WILL ACTIVATE THROUGHOUT THE NOTIFICATION ZONES UPON SPRINKLER WATERFLOW. (CBC 907.2.1) 15. PER SECTION 1114B.1.1, WHEN SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARMS ARE PROVIDED, THEY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CBC, CHAPTER 35. 16. APPROVED NOTIFICATION APPLIANCES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72G IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: RESTROOMS, MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS, OCCUPIED ROOMS WHERE AMBIENT NOISE IMPAIRS HEARING OF THE FIRE ALARM, LOBBIES, MEETING ROOMS, AND ANY OTIHER AREA FOR COMMON USE. SECTION 3501.1, AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6-4.5. 17. DURING CONSTRUCTION, AT LEAST ONE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON EACH FLOOR LEVEL AT EACH STAIRWAY, IN ALL STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION SHEDS, IN LOCATIONS WHERE FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS ARE STORED OR USED, AND WHERE OTHER SPECIAL HAZARDS ARE PRESENT PER CFC 1415.1 18. BUILDINGS UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, AL TERA Tl ON, OR DEMOLITION SHALL CONFORM TO CFC CHAPTER 14. WELDING, CUTTING, AND OTHER HOT WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CDC CHAPTER 26. 19. ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN A LOCATION THAT IS PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. WHERE ACCESS IS BY WAY OF PRIVATE ROAD AND THE BUILDING ADDRESS CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM THE PUBLIC WAY, AN APPROVED SIGN OR MEANS SHALL BE USED TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURE. 20. WALL, FLOOR AND CEILING FINISHES AND MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS IN CBC TABLE 803.3AND SHALL MEET THE FLAME PROPAGATION PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 19, DEVISION 1. DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY TREATED BY A PRODUCT OR PROCESS APPROVED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL WITH APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. 21. DUMPSTERS AND TRASH CONTAINERS EXCEEDING 1.5 CUBIC YARDS SHALL NOT BE STORED IN BUILDINGS OR PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET OF COMBUSTIBLE WALLS, OPENINGS OR COMBUSTIBLE ROOF EAVE LINES UNLESS PROTECTED BY AN APPROVED SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR LOCATED IN A TYPE I OR IIA STRUCTURE SEPARATED BY 10 FEET FROM OTIHER STRUCTURES. CONTAINERS LARGER THAN 1 CUBIC YARD SHALL BE OF NON-OR LIMITEDOCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR SIMILARLY PROTECTED OR SEPARATED. CFC 304.3 22. EXITS, EXIT SIGNS, FIRE ALARM PANELS, HOSE CABINETS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED BY CURTAINS, MIRRORS OR OTHER DECORATIVE MATERIAL. 24. THE EGRESS PATH SHALL REMAIN FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS AT ALL TIMES. NO STORAGE IS PERMITTED IN ANY EGRESS PATHS. ABBREVIATIONS g DIAMETER INSUL. INSULATION AND INT. INTERIOR <t CENTERLINE # POUND OR NUMBER JT. JOINT JST. JOIST A.B. ANCHOR BOLT ABV. ABOVE LAM. LAMINATE ACOUST. ACOUSTICAL LAV. LAVATORY A.C. ASHPALT CONCRETE LT. LIGHT ADJ. ADJUSTABLE L.P. LOW POINT A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR A.F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE MFR. MANUFACTURER ALUM. ALUMINUM MATRL MATERIAL A.G. ANTI-GRAFFITI MAX. MAXIMUM ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL M.B. MACHINE BOLT MECH. MECHANICAL BD. BOARD MIN. MINIMUM BLDG. BUILDING MIN MINUTE BLKG. BLOCKING MISC. MISCELLANEOUS BM. BEAM M.o. MASONRY OPENING BMP BEST MANAGEMENT M.R. MOISTURE RESISTANT PRACTICES MTL. METAL B.O.B. BOTTOM OF BEAM BOT. BOTTOM N NEW BTWN. BETWEEN N.1.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO. OR # NUMBER CAB. CABINET N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE C.B. CATCH BASIN C.F.0.1. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED, 0 OVER OWNER INSTALLED o.c. ON CENTER C.I.P. CAST IN PLACE O.F.C.I. OWNER FURNINSHED, CJ COLD JOINT CONTRACTOR INSTALLED C.J. CONTROL JOINT O.F.0.1. OWNER FURNISHED, C.L. CHAIN LINK OWNER INSTALLED CLG. CEILING O.H. OPPOSITE HAND CLR. CLEAR OPNG OPENING CMU CONCRETE MASONRY OPP. OPPOSITE c.o. CLEAN OUT COL. COLUMN PB PULL BOX COMP. COMPOSITION PERF. PERFORATED CONC. CONCRETE P.H. PANIC HARDWARE CONN. CONNECTION PL. PLATE OR PLASTIC CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION PLAST. PLASTER CONT. CONTINUOUS PLYWD. PLYWOOD CORR. CORRI DOOR PR. PAIR C.O.T. CENTER OF TRUSS PROJ. PROJECTION C.T. CERAMIC TILE P.T.D.F. PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR DBL. DOUBLE DF. DOUGLAS FIR R OR RAD RADIUS D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN RC RELATIVE COMPACTION D.F.C.I. DISTRICT FURNISHED, R.D. ROOF DRAIN CONTRACTOR INSTALLED RECS. RECOMMENDATIONS DG DECOMPOSED GRANITE REFL. REFLECTED DIA. DIAMETER REFRIG. REFRIGERATOR DIAG. DIAGONAL REINF. REINFORCED OR DIM. DIMENSION REINFORCEMENT DISP. DISPENSER REQ. REQUIRED OR DN. DOWN REQUIREMENTS DR. DOOR RETAING RETAINING D.S. DOWN SPOUT RET. RETAINING DWG DRAWING RF. ROOF RM. ROOM E EXISTING ROOFG ROOFING EA EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT s.c. SOLID CORE ELECT. ELECTRICAL SCH ED. SCHEDULE ELEV. ELEVATION SDRSD SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ENCL. ENCLOSURE STANDARD DRAWINGS EQ. EQUAL SHTG SHEATHING EQUIP. EQUIPMENT SHT. SHEET EXIST. EXISTING SIM. SIMILAR EXP. EXPANSION SJ SAWCUT JOINT EXT. EXTERIOR s.M.s SHEET METAL SCREWS SQ. SQUARE F.B. FIRE BLANKET S.S. STAINLESS STEEL F.D. FLOOR DRAIN STD. STANDARD FDN. FOUNDATION STL. STEEL F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER STOR. STORAGE F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER STRUCT. STRUCTURAL CABINET SUSP. SUSPENDED F.F. FINISH FLOOR F.F.E. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION T.A. TOILET ACCESSORY FIN. FINISH TB TOP OF BOX FLASHG FLASHING T&B TOP & BOTTOM FLR. FLOOR TEL. TELEPHONE F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE TEMP. TEMPERED F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH TG TOP OF GATE F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY TJ TOOLED JOINT F.O.S. FACE OF STUD T.O. TOP OF FRAMG FRAMING T.0.B. TOP OF BEAM FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY PANELS T.0.P. TOP OF PARAPET FT. FOOT OR FEET TS TUBE STEEL FTG. FOOTING T.W. TOP OF WALL F.V. FIELD VERIFY TYP. TYPICAL GA. GAUGE U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GALV. GALVANIZED U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED G.I. GALVANIZED IRON GL. GLASS V.A.T. VINYL ASPHALT TILE GLB. GLU-LAM BEAM V.C.T. VINYL COMPOSITION TILE GOVNT GOVERNMENT VERT. VERTICAL GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD V.G.D.F. VERTICAL GRAIN DOUGLAS FIR H.D. HOLD DOWN HDWR. HARDWARE w WITH HOR. HEADER w.c. WA TERCLOSET HGR. HANGER WD. WOOD HORIZ. HORIZONTAL W.J. WEAKENED JOINT H.P. HIGH POINT W.P. WATERPROOF H.M. HOLLOW METAL W.P.B. WATERPROOF BARRIER HR. HOUR W.P.M. WATERPROOF MEMBRANE HT. HEIGHT W.R. WATER RESISTANT WT. WEIGHT W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC /'' ___ -71- INDICATES \ SLOPE 7 SYMBOLS PROPERTY LINE NEW OR FINISHED CONTOURS EXISTING CONTOURS SLOPING SURFACE (2'{ DETAIL NUMBER ~<-(--SHEET DETAIL APPEARS ON ~Ac 4 _< __ SECTION NUMBER ~ SHEET SECTION APPEARS ON F ?';/; I -~ II II 1------?:I 1><1 + @] 8 (D , <B> & ~ CONCRETE SOIL CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT PLYWOOD STEEL WD. BLOCKING WD. CONT. MEMBER WORK POINT, CONNECTION POINT DATUM POINT OR CONTROL POINT KEY NOTE DOOR NUMBER REFERENCE WINDOW NUMBER REFERENCE WALL TYPE REFERENCE SIGN TYPE REFERENCE ALIGN FINISHES DOT DIMENSION INDICATES CENTERLINE TICK MARK DIMENSION INDICATES F.O. STUD OR F.O. STRUCTURAL ARROW DIMENSION INDICATES FACE OF FINISH CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS 1. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH ALL MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, THE PROJECT MUST MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF DIVISIONS 5.1 THROUGH 5.5. 2. 100% OF TREES, STUMPS, ROCKS AND ASSOCIATED VEGETATION AND SOILS RESULTING PRIMARILY FROM LAND CLEARING SHALL BE REUSED OR RECYCLED. A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTIOR WITH VERIFICATIONS NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR SHOWING COMPLIANCE. 3. PREVENT IRRIGATION SPRAY ON STRUCTURES 4. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS, CAULKS. ADHESIVES AND SEALANTS USED ON THE PROJECT HALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS. (SECTION 5 .. 504.4.1 OF CAL GREEN) ADHESIVES, ADHESIVE BONDING PRIMERS, ADHESIVE PRIMERS, SEALANTS, SEALANT PRIMERS AND CAULKS SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RULES WHERE APPLICABLE, OR SCAQMD RULE 1168 voe LIMITS, AS SHOWN IN TABLES 5.504.4.1 AND 5.504.4.2 OF CAL GREEN 5. A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR OR BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYING WHAT MATERIAL HAS BEEN USED AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE MUST BE SUM BITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. 6. AEROSOL ADHESIVES, AND SMALLER SIZE UNIT SIZES OF ADHESIVES , AND SEALANT OR CAULKING COMPOUNDS (IN UNITS OF PRODUCT, LESS PACKAGING, WHICH DO NOT WEIGH MORE THAN ONE POUND AND DO NOT CONSIST OF MORE THAN 16 FLUID OUNCES) SHALL COMPLY WITH STATEWIDE voe STANDARDS AND OTHER REQURIEMENTS, INCLUDING PROHIBITIONS ON USE OF CERTAIN TOXIC COMPOUNDS, OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 17, COMMENCING WITH SECTION 94507. 7. ARCHITECTURAL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH TABLE 5.504.4.2 UNLESS MORE STRINGENT LOCAL LIMITS APPLY. 8. AEROSOL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL MEET THE PRODUCT-WEIGHTED MIR LIMITS FOR ROG IN SECTION 94522(A)(3) AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING PROHIBITIONS ON USE OF CERTAIN TOXIC COMPOUNDS AND OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES (CCR, TITLE 17, COMMENCING WITH SECTION 94507. 9. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND OR THE BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYING WHAT PAINT HAS BEEN USED AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. 10. ALL CARPET INSTALLED IN THE BUILDING INTERIOR SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CARPET AND RUG INSTITUTE GREEN LABEL PROGRAM. ALL CARPET ADHESIVE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE 804.4.1. A LETTER FROM THE INSTALLER CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. 11. HARDWOOD PLYWOOD, PARTICLEBOARD, AND MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS USED ON THE INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 5.504.4 12. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED VERIFYING THAT RESILIENT FLOORING MATERIALS MEET THE POLLUTANT EMISSION LIMITS. 13. SMOKING PROHIBITED WITHIN 25 FEET OF BUILDING ENTRIES, OUTDOOR AIR INTAKES AND OPERABLE WINDOWS WHERE OUTDOOR AREAS ARE PROVIDED FOR SMOKING, AND IN BUILDINGS. SEE A1-1.0 FOR SIGN LOCATIONS AND AD-10.0 FOR SIGN DETAILS. D < C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com T-2.0 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 E0~3/~11c'c-/1~9'-'cR~Ec"c',M';;C~C._...u~.P~.~S"'°U~BM~l'c'cTT"-A:"L._n#c--_2 ______ ___j __ _j__--!-_ ___[ _ __J ~Hlc I __ c_1_11_' ,_1 _c_, 11_1' _c_· ./';_,, _1 {_.1 _,~_: 1_1 i_A_II-----') I c,I w-F; I 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 '1 ~LC WDc:K•,; Lll 't.-: I \Ill\ I 07/31/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 \J Tl,;,, CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER GENERAL NOTES :: I I UICJl-.ll-! RCl lXI 'IRl' LlA. I - ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.A!NII\G 1,0. 395-9 _J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: _J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 29 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 133 of 159 ► - / ---------- IMPALA DRIVE - I I r r 7 [] • tq -st-\J, -~l I yi C"I // n , ,;1/ CODE ANALYS IS & FIRE TRUC K ACCESS PLAN 1 SCALE: I ": 40' D c:::::::J I I ------------ --- -, b' 'CJ,@, . ' ' ' ' ~ ~-:0 -~ 0 ' PROROSED I I GENERJ-:,SERVICES I n 1-st- J EH0USE/SH0P n I I 9,870 GSF n ~ I ~ I PROPOSED 2-STORY / OP ERATIONS OFFICE BUI LDING - Q ROPOSED PARKS WAREHOUSE/SHOP 5,950 GSF C / I 41 ,900 G1 ---------- Cl "' el la ' ' PROPOSED MATERIALS YAR D 20,000 SF ' ACCESSIBLE PARKING REOUIREMENTS NO. OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED SPACES TOTAL 396 8 ~ (2) VAN ACCESSIB LE, (6) CAR ACCESSIBLE ' \ "' \ ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED 8 ~ (2) VAN ACCESSIBLE, (6) CAR ACCESSIBLE - GENERAL NO TES 1. PATH OF TRAVEL (P.0.T.) AS INDICATED IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESS WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1/2" BEVELED AT 1 :2 MAX. SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGES DO NOT EXCEED 1/4" VERTICAL AND IS AT LEAST 48" WIDE. SURFAC E IS SLI P RESISTANT. STABLE, FIRM AN D SMOOTH. MAX IMUM CROSS-SLOPE 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 5% UNLESS OTHERWISE IN DICATED. (P.O.T.) SHALL MAINTAIN FREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM (11 33B.8.2) AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROM WALL AND ABOVE 27" AN D LESS THAN 80" (11338.8.8) ARCH ITECT TO VERIFY THAT ALL BARRIERS IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR WILL BE REMOVED UNDER TH IS PROJECT, AND PATH OF TRAVEL COMPLIES WITH CBC 1133B. 2. SURFACE GRATES LOCATED IN THE PEDESTR IAN PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL HAVE OPE NINGS LIMITED TO 1/2' MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFI C FLOW. LE GEND -EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN D NEW BUILDINGS D NEW COVERED STORAGE ----FIRE TRUCK PATH PROPERTY LINE EXISTING FIRE HYDRI\NT KEY NOTES QJ PROPOSED SECURITY GATE I 2 I PnOPOSED BACK-UP GEN EnATOn 0 EXISTING FUEL ISLAN D 0 PHOPOSl::.LJ I HASH l:::.N C LOSUl-=U:. I I GRAPHIC SCALE NOTE: SHEETS SMALLER THAN 24"x36" HAVE BEEN REDUCED AND GRAPHIC SCALE SHOULD BE USED. 120 C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, Ccli fornia P6 I 9.233. 1023 F6 I 9.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com T-3.0 "'1~0,c:c22c:-c,1c:'s:r.c1Rc'cEc":M':-cc~c""'.u"".Pc:'-.-ocs-;=,u;:;;BM~1T""TA'7L'--';#;:c1------------t----t-------t------1 I s H3EET I Cil7 \T OF ('A· R.l ,~-B 11D I s1-1 EETs I ,c/3/11 /19 RE MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 1 '-' 0 _'-i 05/15/19 RE ,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~ __ P_U_GL_•_:::_v_1c_,R_K_S_c_,[_P_A_R_T_f,l_[t-._T_~ 07/31 /19 RE ,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11 /25/19 RE ,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01 /14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 D1\TE l~J ITli',L DATE lhJITIAL 0 ,1',.TE INITIA L D,Gll-..!EER OF VVORK REVISIOfl DESCR IPTIO~J OTHER -"I PPROV:'\L Cl TY .£1,PPRCVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FIRE ,,\=>P ROVED: CITY Fl•IGll•IEE'! RCE 0 \.liN BY: __ _ CHK J BY: F;\/\VD EY: __ _ TRUCK ACC ES S DPIR ES P ROJ[CT N'.J . 3572 DP.TE DRA.'NING flO. 395-9 ...J 0::: <( w I- I-1-z ~ WCO u ::> z Cl) QI--~ 0::: 0::: ow Oa,_ <Cw co (/) ~ ::> 0::: ...J <( <( Uz u.. 0 01- >-o 1-z uo u OVERALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION NOTES 1. DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN LIMITS OF WORK UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. KEYNOTES REFER TO TYPICAL ITEMS OF DEMOLITION AND ARE NOT ALL-INCLUSIVE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIGALERT (811) AT LEAST TWO DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK AND SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COORDINATE SHUT DOWN, DISCONNECTION AND CAPPING OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY OWNERS PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. 3. PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO REMAIN. 4. THE LOCATION AND EXISTENCE OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WERE OBTAINED FROM A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES AT POINTS OF CONNECTIONS AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS TO DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. 5. COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINS WITH NEW TREE LOCATIONS, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL FACILITIES, AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS. REFER TO LANDSCAPE, PLUMBING, ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING "DRY" UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY PLANS FOR ANY WORK ON OR WITH THESE UTILITIES. 6. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 7. EXISTING EASEMENTS LOCATION ARE APPROXIMATE, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE ACTUAL LOCATION. 15' WIDE WATER EASEMENT EXISTING 15' WIDE WATER EASEMENT DEDICATED TO CMWD (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST) PER REC. DOC NO. 85-233777,7/3/1985 15' WIDE WATER EASEMENT EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER REC. DOC NO. 2004-0409999, 05/06/2004, DEDICATED TO SDG&E. 15 . 0 0 15.00 1 5 . 0 0 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C1.0 OV E R A L L E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S & D E M O L I T I O N P L A N 1" = 40' feet 804040 0 HV2 370.43 HV3 371.78 HV4 365.37 HV6 367.85 APN: 209-050-26 AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 2 8 AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 1 8 AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 2 6 APN: 760-166-53-84 4 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 134 of 159 I,- 1( I '/,. I I ' / 1,, _,.,, 7\0 ....... 1 1 a. r'.conc ', ... ~ ... ' / I -' I I ' : ._,__ ____ ~-----~ \ I I I f I I \ I ><; I 1 I I I I I I • ' 370.2 ,-------- X ----------------------,-______ ,, X -----t-/---0'78------ I I I r---.... _ / ,----.... " 0 \ ' \ \ ,_ I I I I co~c I ~ -I liii 11----- 369,6 -+-------+----.'L---~--_µG=.-~x----x----'~F 0.2 • X 70.9 ~ I I cone -------- 3""" z: 0 -- ' I I • I / I I ( ------/ ,----- ' I ( / ~sph ,/ I B / ,,,,,.-------- / ii ! t// I \ _J___._7;:-::=~--'1 I I _1fa ------------- :::---1 _t,./ ~,,) \ 36=7:\,\~\'~;:EL=.::3~6071.6~~-7-77,_:--:;PETRO FUEL FILL UIA\-\ L: J,_67 9 . ~: ... "'"' ~ COflC l'(IIA E. . t? ~;67 .68 e,, PETRO FUEL F/LL I ;67.B 0 ,/ _,/ ____ ,,,, ..... •6iiil - l"'::r'=="'-----\-_:;5,---=- __,;is:z&... w-----~ ,..,, ... ✓ 00 =sa ')..IL X --------------------- ----~@!?.~J-;60,9!!'-1 ' ---- .---'-1-----~--, ....... __ ... -- ' I p\\e \ / 370. ,,..... / ' / ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ............ __ \ \ \ \ ----- ' ' ' I \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ I \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ I I I I I • DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL DATE INITIAL Cl TY APPROVAL (/" ' (c -<;'2.CTS 0' I SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES 0 I SHEETS I DATE DWN BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 20 21 22 23 S S SD SD W W ///////// ///////// ///////// ///////// ///////// X X Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C1.1 DE M O L I T I O N P L A N 1" = 30' feet 603030 0 HV2 370.43 HV3 371.78 HV6 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //////////////// 3 3 14 14 16 5 6 6 6 6 10 10 10 10 10 9 12 17 9 9 11 17 18 2 2 2 14 5 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 10 10 APN: 209-050-26 AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 2 8 APN: 760-166-53-84 5 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 135 of 159 -RW □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ o.2. ..c: Cl. Cl) <( • I I I I \)1,\\\ ~...,:,c-;1"0.o'g:,'s'"" 1',\\A tl.: \)1,\\\ 1',\l,\ tL: \)1,\\\ 1',\l,\ tL: :,70,BO' \)\,\\\ 1',\l,\ tL·, :,70,97. \)1,1\\ 1',\l,\ tl.: :,10.sB' \)1,1\\ 1',\l,\ tL: \)1,\\\ 1',\l,\ tL: 370.B:>' -• I I I I J I I I ) I I I I I I □ -□ j l/J ,/----~/ ~:'-L: 351.so·351.9 1 , __ , --~0 ---.-1 --- -~ 7:e#,-/-,---/ _69" -Ld--L/ ~"',6B-~/~ _-.J. ,.; .. (~~.;,.,,1'..l:/,WR~W L--" . • DEMOLITION KEYNOTES DEMOLITION KEYNOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, PROTECT IN PLACE □ DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING WATER LINE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE □ DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING PCC CURB AND GUTTER DEMOLISH AND REMOVE PCC CROSS GUTTER □ EXISTING COOLING TOWER TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE □ DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT DEMOLISH AND REMOVE STORM MH I CATCH BASIN □ EXISTING LIGHT, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT □ EXISTING PCC CROSS GUTTER, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN □ DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE □ EXISTING STORM MANHOLE, PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE □ EXISTING WATER LINE, PROTECT IN PLACE SAWCUT EXISTING AC PAVEMENT □ SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ELECTRICAL SCOPE EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE □ DEMOLISH EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE EXISTING FUEL ISLAND TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE -• .... . . . . :. ,- . :. -.. .. .. ·-. ... ·• MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET C1 .2 H (/" ' ----- (/ -,:'2-CTS 0' 0 DEMOLITION LEGEND I I I I I I I I I I- • • . • H H A' . • DEMOLISH AND REMOVE AC PAVEMENT INCLUDING BASE MATERIAL CLEAR AND GRUB AREA PCC PAVEMENT REMOVAL DEMOLISH EXISTING FENCE DEMOLISH EXISTING CURB SAWCUTLINE APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK DEMOLISH EXISTING STORM DRAIN DEMOLISH EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DEMOLISH WATER LINE • l---+----+------------+---+---+--+-----11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~=::'....::::=========:...::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL Cl TY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 20 21 22 23 S S SD SD W W ///////// ///////// ///////// ///////// ///////// X X EX.10" ACP WATER EX . 1 0 " A C P W A T E R Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C1.2 DE M O L I T I O N P L A N 1" = 30' feet 603030 0 HV4 365.37 HV6 367.85 / / / / / / ////////////////////////////////////////// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 14 3 3 3 14 14 3 16 16 16 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 10 7 15 18 10 14 5 14 5 14 14 14 14 5 14 6 10 10 10 10 10 8 14 19 19 5 23 213 13 21 11 13 22 22 22 22 23 23 5 22 22 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 20 20 20 20 4 4 4 8 21 21 4 ///////////////////////////////////// / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /1 23 / / / / / / /13 // 8 / / / / / AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 1 8 AP N : 2 0 9 - 0 4 1 - 2 6 TO BE RELOCATED TO BE RELOCATED 6 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 136 of 159 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ I I V / I I \ I I \r \ \ I \, z- 0 - \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I \\ \ I \ \ I ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ ' \ ' \ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ -- ' -- (/1 DEMOLITION KEYNOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE PCC CROSS GUTTER DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE STORM MH / CATCH BASIN DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE SAWCUT EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FUEL ISLAND TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE G COft □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ PE -/- / / / / / / / DEMOLITION KEYNOTES DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING WATER LINE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING PCC CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING COOLING TOWER TO REMAIN, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING PCC PAVEMENT EXISTING LIGHT, PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING PCC CROSS GUTTER, PROTECT IN PLACE DEMOLISH AND REMOVE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING STORM MANHOLE, PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATER LINE, PROTECT IN PLACE SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ELECTRICAL SCOPE DEMOLISH EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET C1 .1 \ \ \ ........................ (/ (!- ' -,:'2-CTS 0' 0 DEMOLITION LEGEND / / / / / / / / ll l II H H 8 H II H DEMOLISH AND REMOVE AC PAVEMENT INCLUDING BASE MATERIAL CLEAR AND GRUB AREA PCC PAVEMENT REMOVAL DEMOLISH EXISTING FENCE DEMOLISH EXISTING CURB SAWCUTLINE APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK DEMOLISH EXISTING STORM DRAIN DEMOLISH EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DEMOLISH WATER LINE • l---+----+------------+---+---+--+------11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~=::'....::::=========:...::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL Cl TY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. FEMA NOTES 1. FEMA MAP NUMBER: 06073C0769G PANEL : 0769G 2. THE SITE IS LOCATED AT ZONE X. 3. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION: 104 FEET . SIGHT TRIANGLE STORMWATER NOTE: FOR STORMWATER BMPS REFER TO PROJECT STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN C2.0 OV E R A L L C I V I L S I T E P L A N 1" = 40' feet 804040 0 ACCESSIBILITY NOTES 1. COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (2013 CBC) FOR ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 2. MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE ON WALKWAYS SHALL BE 1.5%. 3. NO CHANGES IN LEVEL GREATER THAN 1/2" SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT A RAMP. CHANGES IN LEVEL BETWEEN 1/4" AND 1/2" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:2. 4. CATCH BASIN AND DRAIN INLET GRATES SHALL HAVE SPACES NO GREATER THAN 1/2" WIDE IN ALL DIRECTION. IF GRATINGS HAVE ELONGATED OPENINGS, THEY SHALL BE PLACED SO THE LONG DIMENSION IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DOMINANT DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 5. CURB RAMPS SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEREVER ACCESSIBLE ACCESS ROUTES CROSS A CURB. 6. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND HANDRAILS SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEREVER SLOPE EXCEEDS 4.5%. MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 8.33%. LEVEL LANDINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF EACH RUN EQUAL TO THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP, 60" X 60" MINIMUM, AND INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 30" OF VERTICAL RISE. BOTTOM LANDINGS AND INTERMEDIATE LANDINGS WITH DIRECTION CHANGES IN EXCESS OF 30 DEGREES SHALL BE MINIMUM 72" IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. RAMPS AND LANDINGS WITH VERTICAL SIDE DROP-OFFS SHALL HAVE WALLS, RAILINGS, PROTECTIVE SURFACES OR MINIMUM 6" HIGH CURBS. 7. ALL STAIRS SHALL HAVE A 2" WIDE SLIP RESISTANT, CONTRASTING COLOR STRIPE (FULL WIDTH OF STAIRS) AND DETECTABLE WARNING, 1" MAXIMUM FROM NOSING ON ALL TREADS. 8. ALL PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPES (SLOPES PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL) SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 1.5%. ALL RAMPS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1 IN 12. ALL LANDINGS AT STAIRS AND RAMPS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.5% (BOTH DIRECTIONS). ALL WALKWAYS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE LESS THAN 5% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. ALL MAXIMUM SLOPES ARE ABSOLUTE AND SUPERSEDE CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES STATED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATION OR ELSEWHERE. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE OPTION OF ADJUSTING GRADES TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE BUT SHALL NOT ADJUST GRADES TO LESS THAN 1% SLOPE OR GREATER THAN 1.5%. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ARCHITECT REGARDING ANY GRADE REVISIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT AREAS. THE PAVEMENT SLOPES WILL BE REVIEWED AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND PAVEMENT OVER THE MAXIMUM SLOPES SPECIFIED ABOVE SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (UTILITY PIPES, STRUCTURES, ETC.) SHOWN ON THESE PLANS (MAIN LINES ONLY - NO SERVICE LATERALS) WERE ASCERTAINED BY A REVIEW OF RECORDS PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY AGENCIES AND ARE APPROXIMATE. NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE ENGINEER ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN OR NOT IN THE LOCATION SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY NOTE THE FOLLOWING UTILITY LINES ARE SHOWN FOR COORDINATION PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR INFORMATION AND DETAILS. E - ELECTRICAL - ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS COM - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS G - GAS - ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS EARTHWORK VOLUME CUT: 4440 CY* FILL: 6918 CY* IMPORT: 2478 CY* REMEDIAL GRADING: 121000 CY* * CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINE THEIR OWN QUANTITIES. SIGHT TRIANGLE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS - LEFT-TURN POCKET LENGTH EXTENSION THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE PROJECT: ·SB LEFT-TURN APPROACH AT ORION STREET / FARADAY AVENUE - THE PROJECT SHALL EXTEND THE LEFT-TURN LANE AT THIS APPROACH BY 26 FEET. THE EXTENSION OF THIS LEFT-TURN LANE CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY RESTRIPING ·SB LEFT-TURN APPROACH AT EL CAMINO REAL / FARADAY AVENUE – THE PROJECT SHALL PAY A FAIR-SHARE CONTRIBUTION OF 10.9% TO RECONSTRUCT THE MEDIAN AT EL CAMINO REAL TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENSION OF THE LEFT-TURN LANE AT THIS APPROACH. Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 367.75 F.F. 369.00 F.F. BMP NO.: 4 2,642 SF 366.44 FG BMP NO.: 5 972 SF 365.96 FG BMP NO.: 61,038 SF 366.09 FG BMP NO.: 1 2,543 SF 366.56 FG BMP NO.: 8 767 SF 363.66 FG BMP NO.: 9 12,023 SF 363.57 FG BMP NO.: 10 4,599 SF 361.70 FG BMP NO.: 7 1,479 SF 363.44 FG BMP NO.: 2MWS-L-4-8-V BMP NO.: 3 MWS-L-8-12-V 7 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 137 of 159 0' ' ~ ~ ' • ~ -R i w i 0 N z !!;, I I , ~.,, ... .,,, ........... / Col"IC ........... ,, I ', i--;'----..L--------, \ 2 I .c I a. I ., <( I I I I f I I I I I I I •' I f I f I f I -• I I I I 0 I i I I I CoflC I I I I I I I I I 0 I I co•,~ I , ( I I / ------------ \-------........ \ ----- I \ \ I I I I I \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I lliii • lliii I I I I f --- ' --~,;,.<a' - I I ,, ' I ' -c:, c:, c:, + ~ ' ' ' <') + .... ~ I I ., I ( . 1/ --• , I ' 2+0 o-/ I 'ti, '& -"' ~ i? , ---------- ------ ORION t--4+or.oo WAY'f\ .... "' ' ' I I I \ I I I I ,}" ' " ' ~/2,"/ /// ,,,,/' ' ' ' /r ,,. .,,, ~~~~--~--'.,1 //~of 68-✓' I ,-,J ,. ' / :"::l ' ' ' ' /' ' ............................ _ ' ' ' ' -' '-.... '' . ' ' ,' 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. GENERAL NOTES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIGALERT (811) AT LEAST TWO DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK AND SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND COORDINATE SHUT DOWN, DISCONNECTION AND CAPPING OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY OWNERS PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ALL EXISTING FACILITIES AT ALL TIMES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE LOCATION AND EXISTENCE OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WERE OBTAINED FROM A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES AT POINTS OF CONNECTIONS AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS TO DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINS WITH NEW TREE LOCATIONS, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL FACILITIES, AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS. REFER TO LANDSCAPE, PLUMBING, ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL EXISTING "DRY'' UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY PLANS FOR ANY WORK ON OR WITH THESE UTILITIES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. TDM SECURE BIKE PARKING -1 POINT PROVIDE A SECURE, WEATHER-PROTECTED BIKE CAGE OR BIKE ROOM FOR EMPLOYEES. PUBLIC BIKE RACKS - 1 POINT PROVIDE PUBLIC BIKE RACKS NEAR THE BUILDING ENTRANCES FOR ALL CYCLISTS, INCLUDING VISITORS. PASSENGER LOADING ZONE - 1 POINT PROVIDE SIGNED PASSENGER PICK-UP AND LOADING CURB SPACE FOR RIDE-SHARE. END OF TRIP FACILITIES - 1 POINT PROVIDE SHOWER AND CHANGING ROOMS FOR EMPLOYEES WHO USE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION TO GET TO WORK. PREFERENTIAL CARPOOL PARKING -2 POINTS PROVIDE PREFERENTIAL CAR/VAN POOL PARKING SPACES. UP TO 9 PREFERENTIAL CAR/VANPOOL PARKING SPACES. UP TO 4 CAN BE COMBINED WITH PREFERENTIAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE/CLEAN AIR SPACES AND MARKED AS SUCH AS LONG AS THE 5 SPACES SOLELY DEDICATED TO CAR/VANPOOLS ARE CLOSER TO BUILDING ENTRANCES. ALL EFERENTIAL SPACES MUST BE ENFORCED. " ~ I I I -- 0 <1' ->;" "2-C: T S ✓• l--+--+-----------+--+---+--+----llsHEETl~c_rT_Y_o_F_c_A_R_1_s_B_A_D--ilsHEETsl _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT >---+----<t-------------------+----+---1----1-----1 I A_P_P_R_o_v_E_D_: _______________ _ 1----+----+----------------+----l----+---+----1 ~C~ITY~E=;'N:=Gl:=NE=E=:R=:::::R::'C~E===:::E=:X'::::P'::IR:::ES::::===::::;;::=:::=DA:::TE=::::==: __.--, DWN BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL CHKD BY: __ _ REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL RVWD BY: ENGINEER OF WORK Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C2.1 GR A D I N G P L A N 1" = 30' feet 603030 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 367.75 F.F. SD 8 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 138 of 159 \I I ,1 I I I I • I, f .•. I • . I I I I I I '-', O 6 i ' ' ) I I " I • '( /I 'I T I 2 • -• • ' ~ (/) --•----K--. --•--•--• •• --_,.a.-C.-,~--------+--,-, ' - ----RRW --~---+< --------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRADING KEYNOTES 5' WIDE CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G-12 6" WIDE TRENCH DRAIN STORM DRAIN PIPE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR SIZE AND TYPE HEADWALL PER SDRSD D-34 DRAINAGE OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STORM INLET SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STORM MANHOLE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RETAINING WALL PER SDRSD C-03 NEW FENCE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEW GATE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT SEE C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER SDRSD G-27 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM BIOFILTRATION BASIN PER DETAIL 2 C5.0 6" PCC CURB PER SDRSD G-1 TRUNCATED DOMES PER SDRSD G-30 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE NEW FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION TO MATCH EXISTING FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION REPLACE EXISTING CROSS GUTTER IN KIND 12'X12" AREA DRAIN 3" SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN PER SDRSD D-27 CONCRETE WALL PER SDRSD C-11 B MODULAR WETLAND BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM (VAULT) \----370.40 TC 369.90 FS ---\ I \ I I I I \ I I ii ,_ I I ' _, ------' lf~--J / w a. - 369.87 TC 369.37 F 369.88 TC 369.38 FS~ BMP NO.: 1 2,543 SF 366.56 FG OVERFLOW IN E 367.56 TG 364.06 IE / 7 I I 369.17 TC 368.67 F 368.62 TC 368.12 FS // I :,, I J_ I D r-:::i □- LEGEND PROPOSED PROP. FENCE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND SLOPE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION NEW BUILDING COVERED PARKING PROP. CONTOURS PROP. STORM INLET PROP. STORM MH PROP. STORM DRAIN PROP. PERF PIPE PROP. STORM INLET PROP. WATER LINE PROP. SEWER LINE PROP. CROSS GUTTER PROP. SEWER CO PROP. WATER VALVE PROP. PCC SIDEWALK 4"PCC W/#3 BARS @180C BW PROP. RETAINING WALL SHORING LOCATION LIMIT LINE PROP. AC PAVEMENT 6"AC OVER 4' CLASS 2 BASE BIOFILTRATION STRUG'f~RAl·BMP-------- 0 SYMBOL ---x--- 2% 65.90 TC / 65.40 FS 64.90 FL --370--- [Il]] (D) SD ---PER:F--- ---s--- II I I I I 111111111111111 ---PIERF--- LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXIST. SEWER LINE EXIST. ELECTRICAL LINE EXIST. TELECOMM LINE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM INLET EXISTING BUILDING ·------ APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK SYMBOL ------ --370-- --t>D-- ---COM-- • (c (/' ' ----- -<;'2.CTS 0' 0 0 l---+----+------------+---+---+--+-----11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~==--===========:.::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL Cl TY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C2.2 GR A D I N G P L A N 1" = 30' feet 603030 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 369.00 F.F. C B A D 9 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 139 of 159 SHORING LIMIT LINE I I l I I I I ! \ I I I 0 ~ 0 + .BBTW 6 .73 BW I 3 4:47 .39BW I \ ORING .47TW 6 .47BW .47TW /·"/ . / 360,67 IE OVERFLOW INLET 362.70 TG ~9,20 IE 361.751E .. -. 1 367.26 TG 364.73 IE 6 .IOBW --. -..:: _{{l,;==;,;=,;t...,;;=;=,=;i ~t :•: l~•~;°'l'• .'•;: \',:_' ;._, .:: I --~· .... • •• :;,;:_,._,•! .: .::,. l ,: ,:., ~ .... __ ..... ~~ --~~'-~- ,· ------, -:..=,___ GRADING KEYNOTES 0 5' WIDE CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G-12 0 6" WIDE TRENCH DRAIN 0 STORM DRAIN PIPE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR SIZE AND TYPE 0 HEADWALL PER SDRSD D-34 0 DRAINAGE OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 STORM INLET SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 STORM MANHOLE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 RETAINING WALL PER SDRSD C-03 0 NEW FENCE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 NEW GATE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT SEE C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER SDRSD G-27 0 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM 0 BIOFILTRATION BASIN PER DETAIL 0 6" PCC CURB PER SDRSD G-1 0 TRUNCATED DOMES PER SDRSD G-30 0 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE 2 C5.0 0 NEW FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION TO MATCH EXISTING FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION 0 REPLACE EXISTING CROSS GUTTER IN KIND 0 12'X12"AREADRAIN 0 3" SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN PER SDRSD D-27 0 CONCRETE WALL PER SDRSD C-11 B 0 MODULAR WETLAND BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM (VAULT) -- LEGEND PROPOSED PROP. FENCE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND SLOPE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION NEW BUILDING COVERED PARKING PROP. CONTOURS PROP. STORM INLET PROP. STORM MH PROP. STORM DRAIN PROP. PERF PIPE PROP. STORM INLET PROP. WATER LINE PROP. SEWER LINE PROP. CROSS GUTTER PROP. SEWER CO ...................................................................................................... . PROP. WATER VALVE PROP. PCC SIDEWALK 4"PCC W/#3 BARS @180C BW PROP. RETAINING WALL SHORING LOCATION LIMIT LINE PROP. AC PAVEMENT 6"AC OVER 4' CLASS 2 BASE BIOFILTRATION STRUG'f~RAl·BMIP-------- SYMBOL ---x--- 2% 65.90 TC / 65,40 FS 64,90 FL --370--- [Il]] (D) SD --+>ERF--- ---s:--- II I I I I 111111111111111 ER MATCH LINE-SEE SHEET C2.1 ' I : /l. /. . . . . / . /\ / / ', /~{;:\-.'I' ' / n ' /, "' ~- / ' /,111 .:~ HL.c,,..;,L,~++-HH 1 /I'· 4+or,oo COlvi E LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING CONTOURS ------- EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXIST, SEWER LINE EXIST. ELECTRICAL LINE ----- EXIST, TELECOMM LINE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM INLET EXISTING BUILDING ·----- APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK OVERFLOW INLET ,, ~ 364.57TG V •~n·o /, 361 40 IE , BMP-NO.: .• . . ' 12023S 5 363.57 FG. ..... -, " ◊ "•,,:--' ·. ' ---- SYMBOL ------ --370-- ---t,D-- ---COM-- 366.78 E / • / /. / • L / ' /. 66 5 ;.; .. ·7 S ~ . .. / _, - --. (/" ' • ( --- ,, -<;'2.CTS 0' 0 0 l----+--+-----------+--+-----t----t-----11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~====--==========::::::....:===; APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER APPROVAL Cl TY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C2.3 EN L A R G E D G R A D I N G P L A N 1" = 10' feet 201010 0 scale 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 140 of 159 5 ) <l ......__ <I ~----- L ......__ ......__ ........... .. ·•\... 368.991W I I '~I .·. 368.93 lW ; "-- 368.43 BW 361.56fS-----c / . • • <~ ·• /~' 4 .. / . G G E E 365.61 lW 362.61 BW .oo-s E E • / - COM E • / s GRADING KEYNOTES 0 5' WIDE CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G-12 0 6" WIDE TRENCH DRAIN 0 STORM DRAIN PIPE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR SIZE AND TYPE 0 HEADWALL PER SDRSD D-34 0 DRAINAGE OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 STORM INLET SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 STORM MANHOLE SEE SHEET C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 RETAINING WALL PER SDRSD C-03 . . •• I ... ... .. ..... ';J, • • ' • • ' .. .;-- -/ 22 -s COM 'E E 0 NEW FENCE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 NEW GATE SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT SEE C3.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 0 PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER SDRSD G-27 0 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM 0 BIOFILTRATION BASIN PER DETAIL 0 6" PCC CURB PER SDRSD G-1 0 TRUNCATED DOMES PER SDRSD G-30 0 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE 2 C5.0 0 NEW FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION TO MATCH EXISTING FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION 0 REPLACE EXISTING CROSS GUTTER IN KIND 0 12'X12"AREADRAIN 0 3" SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN PER SDRSD D-27 0 CONCRETE WALL PER SDRSD C-11 B 0 MODULAR WETLAND BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM (VAULT) . . 8.21%'; ' • l ~ • J "'--• ---• -s E G E ,. • • ~ d, • • 365.61 lW 363.19 BW ' ,,,_ • 0 ~ ·s-,i • • - • / !.:. cc 1/ -------- . ...:, ' . " . . . . <?' . • ---"3''-'10:..;'¼;:,_, ------- ........... / // I /// C) t:1 rs.=/·, 1/ lLJ" /1/ //// j//l //i,r--,__0b7 7"-f/®'.· !!J. I /Ju ·.r ......__ / ........... / /_ I I I I I I J X -So ,, 0 ' -<;'2.CTS 0' 0 0 - - - --___ s~~~4~+op.oo-s----s .., __ --s-_---s--1 ----s-___ // s s s COM COM COM E E E ORI 0 1~ '1v'A \f E E LEGEND PROPOSED PROP. FENCE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND SLOPE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION NEW BUILDING COVERED PARKING PROP. CONTOURS PROP. STORM INLET PROP. STORM MH PROP. STORM DRAIN PROP. PERF PIPE PROP. STORM INLET PROP. WATER LINE PROP. SEWER LINE PROP. CROSS GUTTER E PROP. SEWER CO ...................................................................................................... . PROP. WATER VALVE PROP. PCC SIDEWALK 4'PCC W/#3 BARS @180C BW PROP. RETAINING WALL SHORING LOCATION LIMIT LINE PROP. AC PAVEMENT 6"AC OVER 4' CLASS 2 BASE BIOFILTRATION STRUG'f~RAl·BMP-------- s s - cor G E E SYMBOL ---x--- 2% 65.90 TC / 65.40 FS 64.90 FL --370--- [Il]] (D) SD ---PER:F--- ---s--- II I I I I 111111111111111 ---PIERF---- COM ----COM------,-coMr======-COM 7\ b+:OM ~ ~ s E----E----E----E----r\ Sp U E -re~ I[.___ ----G----~-----G~---7 ,------r.----G----I --- G ----E----E--~-E----E----E----;---t-G--------- LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING CONTOURS ------- EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXIST. SEWER LINE EXIST. ELECTRICAL LINE EXIST. TELECOMM LINE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM INLET EXISTING BUILDING ·------ APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK [ / -- ...... - SYMBOL ------ --370-- --t>D-- ---COM-- • l---+----+------------+---+---+--+-----11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~=:..::::=========:..::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE )N)TIAL ENG)NEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL Cl TY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. ORION STREET BIOFILTRATION SECTIONA SCALE: NTS ORION WAY BIOFILTRATION SECTION CC SCALE: NTS Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C2.4 GR A D I N G P L A N C R O S S S E C T I O N S ORION WAY BIOFILTRATION SECTION BB SCALE: NTS PARKING LOT BIOFILTRATION BASIN SECTION DD SCALE: NTS SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 NOTE: PROVIDE COMBINED RETAINING WALL / BUILDING FOOTING WHERE BUILDING WALL OCCURS April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 141 of 159 60' 30' 20' TOP OF WALL BOTTOM OF WALL ±360.50 TC EX. ROAD ±360.00 BC (ORION STREET) \ CURB & GUTTER _________ L ________ _ VEGETATED PARKWAY 10' 4.5' 5.5' SIDEWALK PAVEMENT DEEPENED FOOTING 50' ±366.47 TW ±361.00 BW ±362.70 TG ±359.20 IE OVERFLOW STRUCTURE ',lr---+--,._ 12" FREEBOARD a---'d:r--_ 12" PONDING 18" FILTRATION MEDIA 12" AGGREGATE STORAGE IMPERMEABLE LINER 6" DIAMETER PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN Pl SUBGRADE SOIL 9' 16' 25' PROP.GRADE PROP.CURB ±366.98 T 5.5' 3.5' ±366.48 FS PROP. PARKING LOT EX.GRADE _j PROP. SIDEWALK 3.5' SEPARATION BETWEEN CURB AND SIDEWALK EX.ROAD r (ORION WAY) I r EX. SCREEN WALL ~ PROP. CONCRETE PAVER PROP. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL PROP. GRADE DRAINAGE SWAL1E TTO DAYLIGHT GUARDRAIL TYP. (AS-NEEDED PER CBC) SIDEWALK PAVEMENT T 18" AC PAVEMENT SECTION ±367.40 FS DEEPENED FOOTING SUBGRADE SOIL . , . ,••· . 368.91 TW 363 .91 TW 363.57 BW TOP OF WALL ±5.34' BOTTOM OF WALL 5' WIDE SIDEWALK PROP. 5' SIDEWALK HANDRAIL 1----ROW/PL 3.5' PARKWAY " PROP. CMU WALL ORION WAY EX.ROAD 364.57 TG 361.57 IE 364.57 TG 361.57 IE OVERFLOW STRUCTURE FREEBOARD = 12" 363.57 FG 6" DIAMETER PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE IMPERMEABLE LINER 0 EX. CURB AND GUTTER l---+----+------------+---+---+--+------11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~=::'....::::=========:...::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL DWN BY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. UTILITY KEYNOTES ROOF DRAIN DAYLIGHT TO BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE (2'X2' PRECAST CATCH BASIN) STORM INLET PER SDRSD D-7 TYPE F CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE PER SDRSD D-09 TYPE A FIRE HYDRANT CONNECT TO EXISTING UTILITY CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM STORM CLEANOUT PER SDRSD SC-01 MARK "STORM" STORM HEADWALL/FLARE END SECTION 1 OUTLET STRUCTURE (3'X3' PRECAST CATCH BASIN) WITH 8" OVERFLOW ORIFICE AT 18" ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF BASIN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 11 8 11 7 7 7 7 10 7 9 10 8 10" PVC WATER LINE13 13 13 UTILITY NOTE 1. ALL NEW WATER LINES TO BE AWWA C900 PVC FOR PIPES 4" AND GREATER, FOR PIPES UNDER 4" TO BE SCH-80 PVC. THRUST BLOCK IS REQUIRED FOR ALL BENDS FOR PIPES ARE 4" AND GREATER. 2. ALL NEW SEWER LINES THAT SERVICE THE NEW BUILDING TO BE SDR 35 PVC. 14 BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER CMWD -W-2014 15 BACKFLOW PREVENTER PER CMWD -W-21 14 14 14 15 16 6" HDPE PERFORATED PIPE 16 16 ROOF DRAIN POC 6" PVC SDR 35 8 1 23 23 23 16 3 16 16 14 7 7 16 12 7 12 17 6" WIDE TRENCH DRAIN 18 SEWER MANHOLE PER SDRSD SM-01 19 SEWER CLEANOUT PER SDRSD SC-01 20 8" SEWER LINE 21 WATER METER FOR DOMESTIC WATER 22 WATER METER FOR RECLAIM WATER 23 2" PVC WATER LINE CONNECT TO EXISTING RECLAIM WATER 10 22 23 19 1919 19 19 18 13 13 20 20 20 9 10 13 3 3 19 8 7 3 16 16 11 3 7 21 21 19 19 19 19 19 19 17 23 2 3 3 SIDEWALK UNDER DRAIN 3 3 12 3 3 1212 8 8 21 21 3 3 VACATE PORTION OF WATER EASEMENT NEW 20' WIDE WATER EASEMENT DEDICATED TO CMWD (AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST) PER REC. DOC NO. 85-233777,7/3/1985 NEW WATER EASEMENT LINE VACATE PORTION OF WATER EASEMENT NEW WATER EASEMENT LINE VACATE PORTION OF WATER EASEMENT NEW WATER EASEMENT LINE VACATE PORTION OF WATER EASEMENT 7 8 7 12 12 NEW WATER EASEMENT LINE NEW 20' WIDE WATER EASEMENT LINE DEDICATED TO CMWD VACATE PORTION OF WATER EASEMENT EXISTING EASEMENT DEDICATED TO SDG&E, CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM SDG&E TO PERFORM WORK WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT 3 NEW 3' WIDE WATER EASEMENT LINE DEDICATED TO CMWD NEW 3' WIDE WATER EASEMENT LINE DEDICATED TO CMWD Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 C3.0 UT I L I T Y P L A N 1" = 40' feet 804040 0 367.75 F.F. 369.00 F.F. SD 10 . 0 0 10.33 20 . 0 0 EA S E M E N T 20 . 0 0 EA S E M E N T 3.00 3.00 3.00 3. 0 0 5.00 12 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 142 of 159 • • -• ======!==~ en C> C> C> C! C> ;l:, m ~ - 0 r\ u Cl en 01 a:: w Q. a:: w Q. r-0 en en Ir Cl eo = 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 l:el I 11 11 \ D 0 0 @B 0 0 @B Et)@ B"SEYl[R (PVC) --:::-"':--.-----:--_;,._ -.-:..L.-..' - ' .. . - --, Cl VJ en ~~ ~ .. x.-)--r .•-;: •. . •• ~-#~;-., 2~· .. •'t".';t.";:! .: ;._",). l.-:. .: · "(.I ,...., .... .,; : _ ... h ~ '.\.,{~ ...,;;,_1,, ··,. "'.•:,.: :.o-t-t-'!.tl·• ". ~ •• 7· :·: .. . i,_J. ;f._, ·!• i . -! .( 1 ,.;,-• l'~ :. ;,. ,_" ~,;._.: :r; :;_-, ~.: _.;:•; · • • U1M 3.24BW - _2+0 .00_ 0 PER Cl VJ APN: 209-050-26 PER 0 . n • APN: 760-166-53-84 \ ~ ~ LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING CONTOURS · EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXIST. SEWER LINE EXIST. ELECTRICAL LINE EXIST. TELECOMM LINE EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM INLET EXISTING FlRE HYDRANT APPROX. LIMITS OF WORK PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE PROP. STORM INLET PROP. STORM MH PROP. STORM DRAIN (PVT1--------- PROP. 6" PERF PIPE PROP. HEADWALL PROP. WATER LINE PROP. SEWER LINE (PVT) PROP. CROSS GUTTER ROP. SEWER CO , PROP. WATER VALVf. ' ()\,_ PROP. WATER METER & BACK FLOW PRVENTER ~ ~ PROP. FIRE HYDRANT , WATER SERVICE POC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SYMBOL ----- --370- -~o-- --COM- CID [I]] l>O<J [Il]] CID SD-- --PERI'--~ l>O<J 0 4 (/" ' (c -<;'2.CTS 0' 0 t--t-----+------------+---l----l-----1------I I SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I ~=='....=:==P:::::U:::::B:::::L:::::IC::::::::W::::O:::::RK:::::S:::::::D:::E:::::P:::::AR::::TM::::::::E::::N:::::T===...:::==::: APPROVED: t---t--+----------------t----1----1----l----1 ~C~ITY~E~NG~l::NE::E::::R=::':R::C~E ====E::X::::Pl:::RE::S:::::::==::::-;::=::::::DA:::TE:::::::=::: DWN BY: PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com CI T Y O F C A R L S B A D O R I O N C E N T E R CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S U B M I T T A L CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 29 395-93572 03/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 C.U.P. 2018-0022 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #407/31/19 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #511/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 CI V I L D E T A I L S C5.0 13 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 143 of 159 I 1 NOTES: TREE ISLAND (TYP) _ BIOFILTRATION BMP MEDIA SURFACE AREA _ TREE ISLAND (TYP) ~---~----~~--~~--~~---~~---~·· • • · I I I I I I I . ' \_ CURB (TYP) MIN. 12" WIDE CUI B CUT (TYP) TREE ISLAND (TYP) TYPICAL BIOFILTRATION BMP PLAN VIEW \'--1_,.l/ _ TREE ISLAND (TYP) FENCE INSTALLED WHERE ADJACENT I----VARIES PER PLAN -----I FENCE INSTALLED WHERE ADJACENT GRADE EXCEEDS 30" (TYP) ~ ~ GRADE EXCEEDS 30" (TYP) I OVERFLOW STRUCTURE _ I CONCRETE CURB WITH CONCRETE CURB WITH MIN. 12' WIDE CURB CUTS AC PAVEMENT SECTION MIN. 18" MEDIA WITH MIN.__,,/ 5 INIHR FILTRATION RATE FILTER COURSE ____/' I 12"WIDE CURB CUTS I MIN. 6" FREEBOARD I 12 .. SURFACE PONDING ] I MAINTENANCE ACCESS (AS NEEDED) I CLEANOUT I AC PAVEMENT SECTION ---~ ~< ~;; MIN. 12' EMBEDMENT (TYP) . -~ "" "' ~ AGGREGATE STORAGE LA YER IMPERMEABLE LINER ~ MIN. 6" DIA. PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN WITH MIN. 3" AGGREGATE BELOW HYDROMOD ORIFICE AT OUTLET TYPICAL BIOFILTRATION BMP SECTION A-A 1. DESIGN CRITERIA SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT BMP DESIGN MANUAL DESIGN. 2. ENERGY DISSIPATION APRON MAY BE INSTALLED AS-NEEDED PER BMP DESIGN MANUAL. 3. GUARD RAILS SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO ELEVATION DIFFERENCES GRATER THAN 30". , TYPICAL BIOFIL TRATION BMP SCALE: NTS 0 l---+----+------------+---+---+--+-------11 SHEET I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEETS I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~=::'....::::=========:...::::::=~ APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL OTHER APPROVAL CITY APPROVAL L.'. D~W'...!N!!:'.....B.!c:Y~: '-====-l l __ P_R_o_J_E_c_r_N_o_·_~I DRAWIN c NO. CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: 2914 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 144 of 159 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L 1.1 - - - ------------ --- I ---, ' \ \ \ \ \ ---------......_ ! l j l j I ! BMP 1 ! l I I V BIOFIL PLANTIN I I ! j ! ·,.._~ ! j - TION I I I EXI TIN FU LIN ST TION OUTDOOR COVERED STORAGE RIGHT OF WAY 7i I I / RECYCLED WATER IRRIGAITON METER ' ' ' --~---~---:~------~--o=--:~----_-__ -__ --'~~9>-~?--_-_-_-_-_-_: ________ ~--------~--~- \ ---. -----1 ____,, -:e-• • • WAREHOUSE/ SHOP • • WAREHOUSE/ SHOP BIKE LOCKER '-I -COURTYARD WITH ENHANCED PAVING COURTYARD WITH -~ ENHANCED PAVING NEW OFFICE BUILDING -----EXISTING SDG&E EASEMENT BMP BIOFIL TRA TION AREA STAIRCASE FOR ACCESS BETWEEN ORION -~ WAY TO ENTRY COURTYARD ENTRY COURTYARD WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEATWALL, BIKE RACKS AND FLAG POLES DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE / ENTRY MONUMENT ACCESSIBLE RAMP -~ PER CIVIL DWGS. RIGHT OF WAY \ • \ • • - - APN: 209-050-26 BIOFILTRATION PLANTING • + PARk lNG LOT TREE PLANTER OR -~~ I PV PANEL SHAD TRUCTURE ,WITHOUT TREES AS A[ RNATE I f:. I 27 STAFF ARKING \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE --- BOTTOM OF BASIN SIGHT DISTANCE LINE - APN: 760-166-53-8 BIOFILTRA TION PLANTING -~~ TRY PLAZA WITH T-¼-IHl-.....,._¼-lH \ - I ' - \ \ D \ RE \ PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD \ MCCELLAN PALOMAR AIRPORT 0 ,I PROJECT SITE ~~ 2600 ORION WAY '<' CARLSBAD, CA VICINITY MAP NTS SITE PERCENTAGE: TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: 326,576 S.F. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 39,254 S.F. 12 % OF THE TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA TOTAL PROJECT PARKING AREA: 121,760 S.F. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN PARKING AREA: 17,302 S.F. 14% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT PARKING AREA BIOFIL TRA TION PLANTING SENSITIVE HABITAT BOUNDARY \ \EXISTING PLANTER TO REMAIN \ "✓ PROJECT LIMIT OF WORK 0 15' 30' 90' LANDSCAPE A RCHITECTS C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.l023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com 462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 107 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2042 619-294-8484 FAX 619-574-0626 ...J ~ i=: LU I-I--z :lE LU CD () ::::> zcn 0 !::: -:lE ~ 0::: ow 0 a.. <Cw Ill en ~ ::::> ~ ...J <( <( Oz u.O Oi= >--1-0 _z 00 () ~10~,2~v~1=aR=E~,M=c--cl---=c~.u~.P~·=su~B~M=IT=T~A~L#=1----------j-------t-------t--------t-----,IsHEcTl~~~~!-~~-~-~~~~:-~~~IsHEETsI ,_ 3/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~LBLIC WORKS DEPART~ENT 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/2 RE C.U.P.SUBMITTAL#8 09/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL JATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER A"PROVAL CITY APPROVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN A~P~OVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE DWN GY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: EXPIRES PROJECT NO. 3572 DATE DRAWING NO. 395-9 L-1.0 2915 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 145 of 159 I I PROPERTY LINE PROJECT LIMIT OF WORK SENSITIVE HABITAT BOUNDARY '\ \ \ EXISTING NATURAL TRAIL \ \ \ \ \ \ I 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.l023 F619.233.00l6 www.RNTarchitects.com 462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 107 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2042 619-294-8484 FAX 619-574-0626 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L 1.0 CITY OF CARLSBAD NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE (2% GRADE IN PLANTING AREAS) AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AND TERMINATING IN AN APPROVED DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 2. ANY TREES LOCATED WITHIN A VEHICULAR SIGHT LINE MUST HAVE ALL LIMBS REMOVED TOA HEIGHT OF SIX (6) FEET ABOVE THE ADJACENT TOP OF CURB. 3. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET FROM CURB. 4. ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE SCREENED. 5. ONLY SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SHALL BE USED TO IRRIGATE ANY VEGETATION WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES OF AN IMPERMEABLE SURFACE UNLESS THE ADJACENT IMPERMEABLE SURFACES ARE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO CAUSE WATER TO DRAIN ENTIRELY INTO A LANDSCAPE AREA. 6. SLOPES 6:1 OR STEEPER REQUIRING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE TREATED WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANTING STANDARDS: a. STANDARD 1 -COVER CROP/AND EROSION CONTROL MATTING: COVER CROP SHALL BE A SEED MIX TYPICALLY MADE UP OF QUICK GERMINATING AND FAST COVERING GRASSES, CLOVERS, AND/OR WILD FLOWERS. SUBMIT THE SPECIFIC SEED MIX FOR CITY APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION. THE COVER CROP SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 90% COVERAGE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS. THE TYPE OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BEAS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND AFFIXED TO THE SLOPE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ON SLOPES 3 FEET OR LESS IN VERTICAL HEIGHT WHERE ADJACENT TO PUBLIC WALKS OR STREETS: WHEN PLANTING OCCURS BETWEEN AUGUST 15 AND APRIL 15, EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE REQUIRED. DURING REMAINDER OF THE YEAR, THE COVER CROP AND/OR EROSION CONTROL MATTING MAY BE USED. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 FEET IN HEIGHT, EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE REQUIRED AND A COVER CROP SHALL NOT BE USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITY. b. STANDARD 2 -GROUND COVER ON HUNDRED (100%) PERCENT OF THE AREA SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A GROUND COVER KNOWN TO HAVE EXCELLENT SOIL BINDING CHARACTERISTICS (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM SIZE OF FLATTED MATERIAL AND SPACED TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE WITHIN ONE YEAR). c. STANDARD 3 -LOW SHRUBS LOW SPREADING WOODY SHRUBS (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF 1-GALLON CONTAINERS) SHALL COVER A MINIMUM OF SEVENTY (70%) PERCENT OF THE SLOPE FACE (AT MATURE SIZE). d. STANDARD 4 -TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS TREES AND/OR LARGE SHRUBS (PLANTED FROM A MINIMUM OF 1-GALLON CONTAINERS) SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM RATE OF ONE (1) PLANT PER TWO HUNDRED (200) SQUARE FEET. 6. SLOPES-6:1 ORSTEEPERAND: a. 3 FEET OR LESS IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND ADJACENT TO PUBLIC WALKS OR STREETS REQUIRE AT A MINIMUM STANDARD #1 (COVER CROP OR EROSION CONTROL MATTING). b. 3 FEET TO 8 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARDS #1 (EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF COVER CROP), #2, AND #3. c. IN EXCESS OF 8 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT REQUIRE STANDARDS #1 (EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF COVER CROP), #2, #3, AND #4. 7. AREAS GRADED FLATTER THAN 6:1 REQUIRE A COVER CROP PER STANDARD #1 WITH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WHEN THEY HAVE ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: a. SHEET GRADED PADS NOT SCHEDULED FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. b. A POTENTIAL EROSION PROBLEM AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY. c. IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY AS HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS TO THE PUBLIC OR HAVE SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT WARRANT IMMEDIATE TREATMENT. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT NOTES: 1. GRADED PAD AREAS SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION, IN THE EVENT THAT CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING(S) DOES NOT OCCUR WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING GRADING. 2. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN: PLACE A BRIGHT YELLOW OR ORANGE TEMPORARY FENCE AROUND TREE AT DRIP LINE, STOCKPILING, TOPSOIL, MATERIAL STORAGE, VEHICULAR USE, FOOT TRAFFIC, AND STORAGE IS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, PROTECT ROOT SYSTEMS FROM FLOODING, EROSION, CHEMICAL SPILLS, AND EXCESSIVE WETTING AND DRYING DURING DE-WATERING, MAINTAIN EXISTING GRADE WITHIN DRIP LINE, CUT ROOTS APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES BACK FROM NEW CONSTRUCTION AND SEAL CUT WITH WOOD PAINT AS MANUFACTURED BY FLINTKOTE OR APPROVED EQUAL, MAINTAIN AND DOCUMENT A TREE WATERING SCHEDULE DURING CONSTRUCTION, REPLACE DAMAGED TREES WITH ONE OF EQUAL OR GREATER SIZE. 3. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE IN ALL AREAS WHERE A TREE IS LOCATED 5 FEET OR LESS FROM HARDSCAPE. ROOT BARRIERS WILL NOT BE WRAPPED AROUND THE ROOTBALL. 4. PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE ARRANGED IN LIKE HYDROZONES. DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT MATERIALS WILL BE ADOPTED FOR MASS PLANTING ON SLOPE, AND PARKING AREA. 5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MIN. 3" DEEP ORGANIC MULCH, PER CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIFICATIONS: CARLSBAD STUMP MULCH MIX (OR EQUIVALENT), AVAILABLE AT MB ORGANICS. MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE IMPROVEMENT/MINIMUM DISTANCE TO STREET TREE TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STOP SIGN)- UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES- ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES- DRIVEWAYS (ENTRIES)- INTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTING CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS)- SEWER MAINS/LATERALS- 20 FEET 5 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 25 FEET 10 FEET LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER LANDSCAPE RELATED CITY AND REGIONAL STANDARDS. 6. ALL PLANTINGS WITHIN THE BASIN PERIMETER MUST BE PLANTS SELECTED FROM APPENDIX E: BMP DESIGN FACT SHEET AND APPROPRIATE FOR BASIN BOTTOMS, SIDE SLOPES, AND EACH OF TEH FOUR SECTIONS AS DEFINED IN APPENDIX E. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THIS PROJECT AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY ALONG ORION WAY AND ORION STREET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. ~10~,2~v~1=8R=E~,M=c-cl-=c~.u~.P~-=su~B~M=IT=T~A~L#=1---------j-------t-------i-------t----,IsHEcTl~~~~!-~~-~-~~~~:-~~~IsHEETsI ,_ 3/11/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~LBLIC WORKS DEPART~ENT 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/2 RE C.U.P.SUBMITTAL#8 09/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL JATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER A"PROVAL CITY APPROVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN A~P~OVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE OWN GY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: EXPIRES PROJECT NO. 3572 DATE DRAWING NO. 395-9 L-1.1 ...J ~ i=: LU I-I--z :lE LU CD () ::::> zcn 0 !::: -:lE ~ 0::: ow 0 a.. <Cw Ill en ~ ::::> ~ ...J <( <( Oz u.O Oi= >--1-0 _z 00 () 2916 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 146 of 159 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND: SYMBOL: BOTANICAL NAME: COMMON NAME: WUCOLS IV 0 ARBUTUS 'MARINA' MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE L 0 CERCIS 'FOREST PANSY' PURPLE LEAVED EASTERN REDBUD L MAGNOLIA 'LITTLE GEM' DWARF SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK + TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' TRUE GREEN EVERGREEN ELM PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND SYMBOL: BOTANICAL} COMMON NAME: EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED: ,--,, ' I \ l c 1 \ / , __ .., .... --, ,, \ I & 1 l / \ ,, , __ ., ,--,, ' I \ 1 • 1 \ / , __ .... ,--,, ' I \ l ■ 1 \ / , __ .., BRACHYCHITON SP. BOTTLETREE EUCALYPTUS SIDEROXYLON IRONBARK EUCALYPTUS CLADOCAL YX SUGAR GUM HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON PINUS PINEA STONE PINE WASHINGTON IA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM EXISTING TREES TO BE REMAIN: 0 EUCALYPTUS SIDEROXYLON IRONBARK KEY NUMBER: 9 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16 26 27 28 29 12 13 14 15 17 18 11 30 31 CALIPER (IN.): 10" 6" 6" 5" 8" 16"/9" 18" 12" 14" 14" 14" 12" 16" 19" 17" 22" 15" 14"/11"114" 20" 17" 12" 16" 9"/6" 13" 9"/6" 8" 10"/12"111 "11 O" 55' BTH 18" 14" M M L M M REMARK: STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. MULTI-TRUNK STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. MULTI-TRUNK STD. STD. STD. STD. MULTI-TRUNK MULTI-TRUNK STD. MULTI-TRUNK STD. MULTI-TRUNK STD. STD. STD. QTYJSIZE 451100% 24" BOX 71100% 24" BOX 8 I 100% 24" BOX 12140% 36" BOX, MULTI TRUNK 60% 24" BOX, STD. 151100% 24" BOX 181100% 24" BOX 10 I 100% 24" BOX PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND (CON'T): SYMBOL: BOTANICAL NAME: SHRUBS LARGE I SPREADING SHRUBS SUCH AS: ( I I I I I '-'..,_,, am CENOTHUS SPP. LANTANA SPP. PYRACANTHA SPP. WESTRINGIA SPP. LARGE ACCENT I SPECIMEN SHRUBS SUCH AS: ~ AGAVE 'BLUE GLOW' AGAVE DESMETTIANA CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM EL YMUS 'CANYON PRINCE' FURCRAEA FOETIDA MEDIOPICTA HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA LAVA TERA ASSURGENTIFLORA MEDIUM I ACCENT SHRUBS SUCH AS: 0 SUCCULENT MASSINGS SUCH AS: GRASS MASSINGS SUCH AS: BOUGAINVILLEA 'LA JOLLA' CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' CARISSA SPP. ROSMARINUS 'TUSCAN BLUE' SALVIASPP. ALOEDAWEI ALOE 'ROOIKAPPIE' ALOE STRIATA COTYLEDON ORBICULATA 'CINDERELLA' COTYLEDON ORBICULATA 'FLAVIDA' CRASSULA OVATA 'HUMMEL'S SUNSET PORTULACARIA AFRA 'VARIEGATA' SEDUM SPP. SENECIO MANDRALISCAE CAREX DIVULSA CAREX FLACCA CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM JUNCAS PATENS LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE' MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS SECTION A AND SECTION CUN-LINED BMP PLANTS SUCH AS BF-3 BIOFILTRATION AREA ~ ~ INFILTRATION BASIN ~ BACCHARIS DOUGLAS II JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' MAHON IA NEVINII MUHLENBERG IA RIGENS RIBES SPECIOSUM (ONLY PLANT ALONG TOP OF SLOPE) CAREX SPISSA JUNCUS PATENS COMMON NAME: CALIFORNIA LILAC LANTANA FIRETHORN COAST ROSEMARY BLUE GLOW AGAVE SMOOTH AGAVE SMALL CAPE RUSH BLUE WILD RYE VARIEGATED MAURITIUS HEMP RED YUCCA ISLAND TREE MALLOW RED BOUGAINVILLEA ROCK PURSLANE DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH NATAL PLUM ROSEMARY SAGE DAWE'SALOE LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD ALOE CORAL ALOE PIG'S EAR FINGER ALOE GOLDEN JADE TREE RAINBOW BUSH STONE CROP KLEIN IA BERKELEY SEDGE BLUE SEDGE CAPE RUSH CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH DWARF MAT RUSH DEER GRASS MARSH BACCHARIS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH CANYON PRINCE WILD RYE NEVIN'S BARBERRY DEERGRASS FUSCH IA FLOWERING GOOSEBERRY SAN DIEGO SEDGE CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH WUCOLSIV L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L VL L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L SIZE/ SPACING: 30% 15 GAL. 70%5 GAL. AVG. 6'O.C. 30% 15 GAL. 70%5 GAL. AVG. 5'O.C. 20% 15 GAL. 50% 5 GAL. 30% 1 GAL. AVG.4'O.C. 40% 5 GAL. 60% 1 GAL. AVG. 1-1/2' TO 2' O.C. 100% 1 GAL. PER PLAN AVG.2'O.C. 100% 1 GAL. PER PLAN 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.l023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com 462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 107 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2042 619-294-8484 FAX 619-574-0626 ...J ~ i=: LU I-I--z :lE LU CD (.) ::::> zcn 0 !::: -:lE ~ 0::: ow 0 a.. <Cw Ill en ~ ::::> ~ ...J <( <( oz u.O Oi= >--1-0 _z (.)Q (.) ~10~,2~v~1=8R=E~,M=c--cl---=c~.u~.P~·=su~B~M=IT=T~A~L#=1----------j-------t-------t--------t-----,IsHEcTl~~~~!-~~-~-~~~~:-~~~IsHEETsI ,J3/11/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 )5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~LBLIC WORKS DEPART~ENT )7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/2; RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/2; RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/2; RE C.U.P.SUBMITTAL#8 09/09/2; RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER A"PROVAL JATE INITIAL CITY APPROVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDSCAPE CONCEPT LEGEND CITY ENGINEER RCE EXPIRES DATE OWN GY: I PROJECT NO. I DRAWING NO. CHKD BY: ---3572 395-9 RVWD BY: l'_'_=c,__o=====-" ~---------~ ~----~ L-1.2 2917 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 147 of 159 + G-- WAREHOUSE/ SHOP I • I i i WAREHOUSE/ SHOP NEW OFFICE BUILDING 'I I I I I I I I I □ □ □ □ WAREHOUSE/ SHOP -- . I i • PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE FF PARKING *THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT PLUMBING FROM IRRIGATED PLANTERS TO THE STORM DRAIN. APN: 760-166-53--84 \ \ WATER CONSERVATION LEGEND: SYMBOL: Ill \ \ I DESCRIPTION HYDROZONE FOR LOW WATER USE PLANTS AS BIOINFILTRATION PLANTING WITH DRIP IRRIGATION HYDROZONE FOR MODERATE WATER USE TREES WITH BUBBLER IRRIGATION HYDROZONE FOR LOW WATER USE PLANTS WITH DRIP IRRIGATION • ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE IRRIGATED BY RECYCLED WATER. TOTAL AREA: 25,041 SF 1,879 SF 20,451 SF WATER CONSERVATION CONCEPT: THIS PROJECT IS PLANNED WITH WATER CONSERVATION PHILOSOPHY WHICH IS INLINE WITH THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES FOR WATER-EFFICIENT LANDSCAPES BY CITY OF CARLSBAD. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PLANNING AND DESIGN • DESIGN FOR AESTHETICS, PRACTICALITY AND ABOVE ALL, WATER EFFICIENCY. • USE PLANTS FOR NATURAL HEATING AND COOLING OPPORTUNITIES NEXT TO BUILDINGS. • TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERESTING AND COLORFUL DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS. • CONSIDER SUN ORIENTATION, SOIL TYPE, SLOPES, LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES AND PLANNED USAGE. SOIL ANALYSIS • TEST SOILS TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR SPECIFIC SOIL AMENDMENTS. • INCORPORATE SOIL AMENDMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION AND PLANTING. • ADD COMPOST AND AERATE SOILS FOR BETTER WATER ABSORPTION AND TO IMPROVE WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY. APPROPRIATE PLANT SELECTION • SELECT PLANTS THAT ARE NATIVE TO THE REGION. • SELECT PLANTS BASED ON THEIR ULTIMATE SIZE IN ORDER TO REDUCE PRUNING MAINTENANCE. • GROUP PLANTS TOGETHER ACCORDING TO THEIR WATER AND SUN NEEDS (HYDROZONES). • USE PLANTS WITH MINIMAL WATER REQUIREMENTS ON HOT, DRY AREAS WITH SOUTH AND WEST EXPOSURES. • LIMIT THE USE OF PLANTS THAT REQUIRE MORE MOISTURE, AND IF USED, SELECT PLANTING AREAS THAT ARE IN THE COOLER AREAS ON NORTH AND EAST FACING SLOPES AND WALLS. • REDUCE EVAPORATION BY USING TREES TO SHADE THE SOIL AND BLOCK THE WIND. PRACTICAL TURFGRASS AREAS • LIMIT THE USE OF TURFGRASS TO REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND WATERING COSTS. • DESIGN TURFGRASS AREAS FOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES SUCH AS EVENT LAWN AREAS. EFFICIENT IRRIGATION • WATER DEEPLY AND INFREQUENTLY TO DEVELOP DEEP ROOT SYSTEMS. • WATER IN THE EVENING OR EARLY MORNING TO REDUCE WATER LOSS DUE TO EVAPORATION. • ADJUST THE CONTROLLER MONTHLY TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGING WEATHER CONDITIONS. • INSTALL RAIN-SENSOR DEVICES THAT AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF IRRIGATION DURING RAIN EVENTS. • ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEMS TO ELIMINATE RUNOFF, LOW HEAD DRAINAGE AND OVERSPRAY. USE OF MULCHES • USE MULCH TO KEEP PLANT ROOTS COOL, MINIMIZE EROSION AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. • ADD ORGANIC MULCHES TO DECOMPOSE AND ADD NUTRIENTS TO THE SOIL. • LIMIT THE USE OF ROCKS AROUND PLANTS BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THE AREA HOTTER. APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE • USE ORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND COMPOSTING TO IMPROVE SOIL TEXTURE. • REPLACE MULCH AS IT DECOMPOSES. • OCCASIONAL PRUNING OF TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMOVE DEAD STEMS PROMOTES BLOOMING AND CONTROLS HEIGHT/SPREAD. • AERATE TURFGRASS AREAS IN THE SPRING AND FALL. • REGULARLY INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. IRRIGATION CONCEPT: 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.l023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com 462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 107 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2042 619-294-8484 FAX 619-574-0626 ...J ~ i=: LU I-I--z :lE LU CD (.) ::::> zcn 0 !::: -:lE ~ 0::: ow 0 a.. <Cw Ill en ~ ::::> ~ ...J <( <( oz u.O Oi= >--1-0 _z (.)Q (.) PRol~CT BOUNDARY \ IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE PLUMBED FOR RECLAIMED WATER. DRIP APPLICATIONS WILL BE USED FOR ALL SHRUB PLANTING AREA. SHRUBS WITH DIFFERENT WATER REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ZONED SEPARATELY. ALL IRRIGATION WILL BE CONTROLLED BY AN AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEM TO ACHIEVE WATER CONSERVATION. THE CONTROLLER SYSTEM WILL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO WORK AS A CENTRAL CONTROL SYSTEM WITH THE CAPABILITY OF MAKING CONTINUOUS IRRIGATION SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS BASED ON REAL WEATHER CONDITIONS, RAIN, WIND AND HUMIDITY. A RAIN GUAGE WILL BE INCLUDED TO DETECT PERCIPITATION AND WILL THEN DETERMINE WHEN IRRIGATION IS NEEDED. ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL CONFORM TO THE LATEST STATE CODES AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. THE CONTROLLER SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF INTEGRATING WITH EXISTING CITY'S CENTRAL CONTROL SYSTEM. \ \ I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND STATE MODEL WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO). I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS WHEN SUBMITTING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 DATE 0 20' 40' 120' ~10~,2~v~1=8R=E~,M=c-ct--=c~.u~.P~-=su~B~M=IT=T~A~L#=1---------j------t------t-------t----,IsHEcTl~~~~!-~~-~-~~~~:-~~~IsHEETsI ,_ 3/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~LBLIC WORKS DEPART~ENT 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/2 RE C.U.P.SUBMITTAL#8 09/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL JATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER A"PROVAL CITY APPROVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONCEPTUAL WATER CONSERVATION PLAN A~P~OVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE OWN GY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: EXPIRES PROJECT NO. 3572 DATE DRAWING NO. 395-9 L-2.0 2918 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 148 of 159 RECYCLED WATER ~~ POINT OF CONNECTION + WAREHOUSE/ SHOP WAREHOUSE/ SHOP SA 10 NEW OFFICE BUILDING □ □ □ WAREHOUSE/ SHOP s FF PARKING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE " . i • Ii I STAFF P KING I *THERE SHALL BE NO DIRECT PLUMBING FROM IRRIGATED PLANTERS TO THE STORM DRAIN. APN: 760-166-53-84 \ \ l:IDJ\ \ ...--1;1=: [=--:J=I I \ \ \ \ \ I I PROJECT SCOPE BOUNDARY WATER USE LEGEND: SYMBOL: DESCRIPTION RECYCLED WATER USE AREA. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED DESIGNATED OUTDOOR EATING AREAS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, OR ANY EXISTING WELLS FOR THIS AREA. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THIS PROJECT ARE IRRIGATED BY RECYCLED WATER. THE PEAK IRRIGATION WATER DEMAND FOR THIS PROJECT IS AT 8 GALLON PER MINUTE. 0 TOTAL AREA: 47,371 SF C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.l023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com RECYCLED WATER NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 462 STEVENS AVENUE, SUITE 107 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2042 619-294-8484 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CARLSBAD POTABLE AND RECYCLED WATER STANDARDS, 2004 EDITION. FAX 619-574-0626 2. ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES SUCH AS COMFORT STATIONS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, ETC., SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SPRAY BY RECYCLED WATER 3. NO PONDING, RUN-OFF OR OVER-SPRAY IS PERMITTED. 4. ON-SITE CROSS-CONNECTIONS BETWEEN RECYCLED WATER LINES AND POTABLE WATER LINES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 5. NO SUBSTITUTION OF PIPE MATERIALS WILL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. 6. ALL ON-SITE PIPES SHALL HAVE WARNING TAPE PER CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WTER DISTRICT'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. 7. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 18 INCHES OF COVER OVERALL WIRING AND PIPING. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST HEADS TO PREVENT OVER-SPRAYING ON ALL SIDEWALKS AND STREETS. 9. QUICK COUPLING VALVES SHALL HAVE A SPECIAL COUPLE KEY PER CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. 10. METERS SHALL BE SIZED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. 11. ALL IRRIGATION PIPE SHALL BE STENCILED, COLOR-CODED (PURPLE) AND LAID WITH WARNING TAPE PER THE CITY OF CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. 12. ALL POTABLE WATER AND RECYCLED WATER PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE STENCILING ORIENTED TOWARD THE TOP OF THE TRENCH. 13. WHEN A POTABLE WATER LINE AND RECYCLED WATER LINE CROSS. THE RECYCLED LINE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN A PROTECTIVE SLEEVE. THE SLEEVE SHALL EXTEND 10 FEET FROM EACH SIDE, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF POTABLE LINE, FOR A TOTAL OF 20 FEET. 14. A 10 FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN POTABLE WATER AND RECYCLED WATER MAINS MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. THE POTABLE LINE MUST BE INSTALLED ABOVE THE RECLAIMED LINE. 15. A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UTILITIES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 16. AN ANNUAL CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION WILL BE DONE BY EITHER CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OR SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH SERVICES. COPIES OF INSPECTION REPORTS WILL FORWARDED TO THE NON-INSPECTING PARTY. 17. EACH AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AND ITS ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH A SIGN BEARING THE WORDS "RECYCLED WATER USED FOR IRRIGATION" IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH, WITH BLACK LETTER 1" HIGH ON A PURPLE BACKGROUND. THE SIGN SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT IT CAN BE READILY SEEN BY ANY OPERATIONS PERSONNEL UTILIZING THE EQUIPMENT. I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S LANDSCAPE MAN UAL AND ST ATE MODEL WATER EFF I Cl ENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO). I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS WHEN SUBMITTING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. MITCH PHILLIPPE, LLA 3781 0 20' 40' SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 DATE 120' ~10~,2~v~1=aR=E~,M=c--cl---=c~.u~.P~·=su~B~M=IT=T~A~L#=1----------j-------t-------t--------t-----,IsHEcTl~~~~!-~~-~-~~~~:-~~~IsHEETsI ,_ 3/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 ~LBLIC WORKS DEPART~ENT 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/2 RE C.U.P.SUBMITTAL#8 09/09/2 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 DATE INITIAL DATE INITIAL JATE INITIAL ENGINEER OF WORK REVISION DESCRIPTION OTHER A"PROVAL CITY APPROVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT POTABLE & RECYLED WATER USE PLAN A~P~OVED: CITY ENGINEER RCE OWN GY: CHKD BY: __ _ RVWD BY: EXPIRES PROJECT NO. 3572 DATE DRAWING NO. 395-9 L-2.1 ...J ~ i=: LU I-I--z :lE LU CD (.) ::::> zcn 0 !::: -:lE ~ 0::: ow 0 a.. <Cw Ill en ~ ::::> ~ ...J <( <( oz u.O Oi= >--1-0 _z (.)Q (.) 2919 Approved (unbuilt) Fleet Maintenance addition and remodel EXISTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 149 of 159 ------ PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) EXISTIN G 7' HIGH SECURITY FENC E IMPALA DRIVE LA RGE REFUSE -----~ BINS LIMIT OF WORI<--~ (TYP.) m • •,1 y " LJ // I/ '"' _..:/ I . 0 6 I 0 \ "' 30'-6 □'-o~ TYP. OF 6 12 ...-------•TYP. \ 11 \, I I I I I ', + ~ ~ PROPOSED UTI LI TI ES WAREHOUSE/SH P PROPOSED FLEET AND FACILI TI ES ~---, WAREHOUSE/SHOP 9,870 GSF □: ' 9,870 GS F 'f UTILI TIES 21 OURTYARD PROPOSED 2 -S TORY OPERATIONS OFFICE B UILDING 41 ,900 GSF ~--8Rl0N 1/IIA\/ ----~ ------<-. .--------Vi/J,. T ~1 -r-___PA9t! OF TRAVEL TO NFA,iT {] :,---("" sus STOP: EL CAMINO REAL AND FARADAY AYE. I I I I I I I I ~ (TYP .) 5 ' I I I I I I 21 I OURTYARD GENERAL SERVI ES PROPOSED OUTDOOR COVERED STORAGE 11,230 SF PROPOSED PARKS WAREHOUSE/SHOP 5,950 GSF PARKS & CM&I 11 PARKIN G , "• _, . J -- 5 AS-'1.1 io I 0, "' PROPOSED MATERIALS YARD 20,000 SF \ \ _____ (E) VIEW POINT W/GATE ACCESS (E) EDGE OF SLOPE (TYP) ______ SETBACK FROM EDGE OF SLOPE -(TYP.) \ ~ (TYP.) ~•,'P"=''ir'='"T"-''"i' =;=c-·+·=·.., .. =··'"'i'·="=·•~.~p"=··•'ii'"-'"~---=-=--·p--=·-·~'i"''~''r' ~-=~=--'-'l-. i i i ) -c.•~ -•-A A.,~ 0 ~ w _J m <[_ 0.. <[_ u > w " <tz "' ) "' -'2 °' <[_ 0.. 1/a w 1/) -c, /O:: ~ ..,,., ( } j / L ri / 14 EV C r / / 8 ,N) PAR KIN G 0 16 PFWPOSED ti-bEVEL \ \ I Ir [, JF' fro:R I l'i'G-fi m u C TU RE 229 SP ACES -~ r 8 EV PAR KING SPACES 8 EV CAPAB LE PARKING SPA7:Es J --11 16 0 V PA 0 t~-1 /-+---4>,---+H+---4--+-->~l .. ~ E PARKING SPA a 15 a ' .o \ I b '° .-, ' \ \ \ --UNDEVELPOED SITE AREA (E) SECUR ITY FENCE (TYP.) PROJECT SUMMARY OPERATIONS OFFICE BUILDING · UTILI TI ES WAR EHOUSE/SHOP GENERAL SERVICE WAREHOUSE/SHOP: PARKS WAR EH OUSE /SH OP : TOTAL: SHADE STRUCTUR ES: COVERED OU TDOOR STORAGE· FUELING STATI ON CANOPY POLICE COVERED STORAGE TOTAL: 4-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE WITH POLICE STO RAGE: TOTAL PARKING 41,900 9,870 9,870 5 ,950 67,590 GSF GSF GSF GSF GSF 11,230 SF 2,300 SF 4 050 SF 17,580 SF 92 300 SF 92,300 SF STAFF PARKING OPERATIONA L VEH ICLE OPERATIONAL VEH ICLE POLICE VENDOR/GUEST REQUIRED 172 PROVIDED 177 TOTAL: STD. 0/S 91 23 125 12 423 91 23 125 12 428 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED 11 PROVIDED 11 VAN ACCESS IBLE PARKING TOTAL EV PARKING PARKING STRUCTURE SURFACE TOTAL: 4 15 22 INSTALLED 21 CAPABLE 43* 4 15 22 22 16 28 44 *PER CITY OF CARLSBAD ORDINANCE NO. CS 349 10% OF SPACES ARE TO HAVE EV CHARGERS. ½ OF TH E SPACES MAY BE CAPABLE FOR FUTURE EV CHARGERS. LIGHTING ALL SECUR ITY LIGHTING WILL BE SPEC IFIED TO SH IELD DOWNWARD AND NOT SP ILL INTO THE AD JACENT HABITA T PRESER VE . NOTE: PEDES TRIAN GUARDRAILS TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL RETAIN ING WALL AND SITE CONDI TIONS WHERE REQU IRED. ------ / , / / f I _!'.-------------------- -----------------------------------; I I I o· 40' --80' I '2' V 0 y 120' C.U.P. 2018-0022 0 0 _.,f'_GTS ' ' Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, Ccli fornia P6 I 9.233. 1023 F6 I 9.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com ...J 0::: <( w I- I-1-z ~ WCO u ::> z Cl) QI--~ 0::: 0::: ow Oa,_ <Cw co Cl) ~ ::> 0::: ...J <( <( Uz u.. 0 01- >-o 1-z uo u G: }--s-~;-A-~-: ~-:4LA_o_N _____ -+-------------1 I / GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=40' AS-1.0 GENERAL NOTES A ALL ITEMS A RE NEVV U.0.N B. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLANS C. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PLANTING AND LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PLANS. D BUS STOPS: N EAnEST BUS STOPS AnE ACnoss THE STn E.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONS IBLE FOR MAINTAINI NG EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION. F. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING NATIVE TREES AN D VEGETATION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. G . ALL PAVING AND FINISI I GRADES SI IALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS. KEY NOTES QJ BIOSWALE PLANTER I BASIN. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS Ei:j CONG. LOADING DOCK 0 RETAINING WALL, SEE l,IVIL DRAWINGS ~ OUTDOOR M EETING D ECK 0 OPTIONAL PARKING SHADE CANOPIES W/ P.V.SOLAR PANELS~ CIP CONC. IV1ATERIAL ENC LOSURE WALLS 0 (E) STORAGE CONTAINERS AFTER RELOCATION ~ CIP CONG. STAIRS 0 CM U TRASH ENCLOSURE a (E) CONTAINERS 0 SECURl1Y GATE ~ RIDE/SHARE DROP OFF AREA 0 FUELING STATION CANOPY BY OTHERS ~ LONG-TERM BIKE LOCKER STORAGE OJ (E) FUELING STATION TO BE REPLAC ED BY OTI IERS ~ ACCESSIBLE RAMP 0 BACK-UP GENERATOR ~ BIKE/SCOOTER STORAGE & SEATING AREA ~ TRANSIT INFORMATION KIOSK 120 I SENS ITIVE HABITAT 121 I OUTDOOR EMPLOYEE EATING AREA LEGEND (NJ 6 ' HIGH SECURITY FENCE LIM IT OF WORK PATI I OF TRAVEL TO NEAREST BUS STOP I =1~0/~2~2/~1=8~IR~E?-'-',M=Ct---=C~.u=_~p~-~S=U~B~M~IT=T~A=L~#~1~-----------+---l-----t--,I SHEET l ~:~~,_,_.T_~_F _n_~-~~-0-B_A_D~I SH EETS I ,Q3/11/19 RE MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 1 L 1 • ,0 i-1. 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 PUG L C WORKS D[PARH,l[t-. T 07/31/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 D1\TE l~JITli',L DATE lhJITIAL 0,1',.TE INITIAL D,Gll-..!EER OF VVORK REVISIOfl DESCRIP TIO~J OTHER -"I PPROV:'\L Cl TY .£1,PPRCVAL CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN ,,\=>PROVED : CI TY F1,1G11,IEE'! RCE DPIRES 0 \.liN BY: CHK J BY: F;\/\VD EY: __ _ PROJ[CT N'.J . 3572 DP.TE DRA.'NING flO. 395--9 112 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 20 292920 369'-0" + 392' - 0" April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 150 of 159 I I 1' I I T.O. JCH/ SCREEN ELEV. 1399'-o" RIGHT OF WAY- j_ Tn PlRAPET_~-- ~;95'-6" I 1 c,,,J FLOOR -2ND FLOOR -~-ilifh81'-o'" ~ FlNISH_fLO~□R~~ ~v ~-- 'l. I I I 1' 2 +------ 1 ...J ~I 0 u.: 0 SITE SECTION 1----- SCALE: 1:25 11 10 GENERAL NOTES A. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LEGEND ------(N) 6' HIGH SECURITY FENCE --------LIMITOFWORK KEYNOTES ~ BIOSWALE PLANTER 0 RETAINING WALL 0 PARKING SHADE CANOPIES W/ P.V.SOLAR PANELS 0 WAREHOUSE BUILDING 0 8' HIGH SECURITY FENCE (WROUGHT IRON) 0 MECHANICAL SCREEN 0 OFFICE BUILDING 0 VIEWPOINT 0 8' HIGH SECURITY GATE (WROUGHT IRON) ~ STORAGE SHADE CANOPY ~ FUELING CANOPY BEYOND o' 25' 50' 75' ---□ I __ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=25' D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u AS-1.1 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 E"c3~/c:;--;11~/1cc;91-'cRc':cE'f'c,Mo2"C~C'--;'.u;';c.P_'-. ~S~UB~M~l~TT~A~L'-'!:#~2----------l--+---+-----1-----1 ~H le I __ c_1 _11_' ,_1 _c_, 11_1 I _c_4_" _1 {_I _,~_, ll_l_A_II---') I c,I w-F; I 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 '1 ~LC WDc:K',; Lll 't.-: I \Ill\ I 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 1/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 5/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 7/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 9/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 INI II."'. 8THER /."PROV/-.L ll'JI I IA.I CIT'/ APPR:JV/sl ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER SITE SECTION RCl lXI 'IRl' F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.i\/Nli'-G 1,0. 395-9 FLEET AND FACILITIES 113 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 21 292921 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 151 of 159 0--£0JIVA__LL,__ ~ ~E SHOP AREA 950S.F. T SECURE TOOLS STORAGE 1,100S.F. A.2f--,-----+----------_L ____ , .,--- ~ ~\I llf-----3 @-----'- 8----- &-- @---£0JNA__LL,__ 1111 / UTILITIES WAREHOUSE 3500 S.F. SECURE PARTS STORAGE 1,100S.F. COMMON TECH. STA. ~ 9 I:,; > IF RECY./ t---------i' 1r-----73 ,,------; 3 1r-----73 Li t 9 I:,;: > IF [Df---, 3 >--+----~II 3f-----~11 T L ~ WAREHOUSE 4765 S.F. SHOP 1320 S.F. ·: ' a ~l;===F=IT=NE=S=S ==,//-l;;=•~•~•~H•MO=N=' ~'r''li';rnrrmEf'"joi:'•iF"'-1!!__ -v' - -_.,===--ee<;J, _)\_"J 400S.F. STA = WOMEN'S LOCKER BREAK ROOM t 0---.~-----------------7 ,------------- (c)--£0JNA.bh_ I j 0 OT WORK GROUP 0 0 ELEC. OT MANAGER \ . ...__ CUST CONF. L ______ _ FLOOR PLAN -FIRST LEVEL SCALE: 1:16 MEN'S LOCKER RM IT/DATA n UP STOR. ·,. :;~ OUTDOOR MEE.TING I COURTYARD cb \ 0 ·,. ./ 0 /. 11""""=,r======,FF= \;;===-==;;~==II SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR 0 IJ rJ OFFICE OFFICE = I ,PY UTILITIES B CREW ROOMS -~ WASTE--- SUPERVISO SUPERVISOR OFFICE OFFICE I - ~ cc= ~ ~ f - FILE ROOM IFcc'c..• -.,...----,--jl ELEV. MACHINE r-WATER ~ WATER ~ CKFLO y_ METER _ WATER_ 'Cl.MD _/ REC. I OPS CM ~ A ~ A I B I I . ·, '· j 11 11 ir-'--lilil c ___________ jl ' j ~ [J (J ,;:J ,· [J 1f (_ :(:. B ( (J r,;J ·< [J (J u CJ i(J 1r :i: j r u u u u u u u (J ,c C :r u ~ u u u ~ ·-L Ll 1;·1 ,r·7 H ill ,r ,_ R n ,r ·-n ,' ·1 I l lLJ ,, :i,c ,,7 ti (I 1: t7 ,ir-1"--e (7 N ,;, . ti 'R" N N ' >-ls. ~ L :ri n n "\ .,/\~/ : \', 1,_ (7 'il L J r _J/l_ i---¥ ~ 4~~ 1R it I '\. I. l):,._: Ci n (7 CJ CJ ;i 1.j ::I ,t .~ '~ ;i I) '',,. :~ "~ [J qr,;J'UCJj It= :a '" ~ [J ti ·.u (l H u c.,J u ,u ,. " I-u :_J u u u u u t u 1U r u u u IJ ~ ·-n n , l (l n !~!.: :t ,_ n r ·-n h ·~ :, n ,, :i.._ H ':/'"--' ., ' I I :1 L H i"-1tl N ,11 fl I!, :r r ~ ls. ti c::i }.aa__: (l (7 'tl Cl(lt' ~ ~ }.,,__: ' '· ... ' TRAINING 3 ROOM N'S LOCKER RM LOBBY □ 0 (j C:::J \ ' 1 9 SIGN SHOP 356SE SUPEVISOR OFFICE CREW ROOM (FAC.) D PW/P REC. I:,;: > IF -,-----,[D 11------,3 11-----,--, 3 --------, WARE- HOUSE SUP. SUP. " ,,..I "I .'lL l FILE -~ CREW ROOMS STREETS t 9 1 9 I:,;: > I:,;: > IF IF ' ----. ._/'( u \ '-.. ~~ g n -,// £CY.I SHOP 2350 S.F. 0 i - ' [ l /. --· "-- 0 I /[ ~ "t 0 I PARKS WAREHOUSE 3,475 S.F. L ~F /11 ----------------------i a :-@] I -.\/~-. 15 = WOME;N'S Q o II v I v r-, . ., ~ -~ • ( -~ ~ 61 II,,~ PARKS TREES ELEC. J OCKERRM w u i-------::9 =1] STOR. I I J -.-;< () ( \ tl \ / r· ' MED CONF. ROOM SUP. SDM SUP. / T .-{_ - ' 1 1 SM. CONF. ROOM . / ~ ., f', I LAYOLJT AREA. ;_, '' " . " u \ I G TYP. 7 I I 7 I J NSPECTOR:: 7 I J SUP. SUP. MANAGER I ~ I _______ _J 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 3/11/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL#2 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 1/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 5/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 7/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 9/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 GENERAL NOTES A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED KEY NOTES QJ ELEVATOR 0 CANOPY OVERHANG ABOVE 0 ROLL-UP DOOR 0 LOADING DOCK PLATFORM 0 FENCE 0 MOVEABLE WALL PARTITION 0 CIP SEAT WALL W/ 5' HIGH STEEL LATTICE SCREEN 0 STAIRS W/ LIGHT MONITOR ABOVE 0 CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE ~ WINDOW SHADE FINS AND AWNING ~ WORK STATION CUBICLES ~ CASEWORK FOR COFFEE STATION W/ SINK ~ WALl<WAY ABOVE ~ SECURITY GATE 16' 32' 48' ---I ___ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=16' 1 D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com A-1.0 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER FLOOR PLAN -FIRST FLOOR INI I .A.I ,,,__::o::oRC1V1\L CIT'/ APPRJ'-/AI ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y RCl lXI 'IRl' F'ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.i\.'.NII\G i,O. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~~ uo u 114 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 22 292922 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 152 of 159 1 OPEN TO BELOW ~ I I l r,..;-17_ ---,,---ITT", 171Tll- ~-++.f#+c:1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 111 r1 i'1._ I I I I I I 11 I I I MEZZANINE 2,400 S.F ------------7 I I MANAGER j LAYOlfT UQ _j I INTERN/ AREA ' ~, CONSULT MAN,t.F<' j ,_ ~ INTERN/ ADMIN. CONSULT SEC. ,,fl 1 {'(", tn 'Ee/ - DIRECTOR MANAGER MGMT y ANALYST ,7 _______ J --~-' _____ J TYP. I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' FLOOR PLAN -SECOND LEVEL SCALE: 1:16 I I I I I >-- OILEt· Racy LIBRARY _______ J . . 0 TYP. 6 I COPY ( ASSIST ASST ASSOC OFFICE CENTER ENG ENG ENG SPECIALIST ENG ASSOC I.T. OFFICE ROOM TECH ENG SPECIALIST ( ~ - -TYP. - e"WlbiFl Fl ,=; 121<2 1H11~>---- ~I CONFERENCE' I ASSET OPS SR -SR --'< MANAGER SCHEDULER EN~R ENGINEER ::C1 LG.C( • 14x24 .. I I -------.-: ' ' L------· ---·--~. _-. ____ --____ , --------· __ - w a. 0 ; \ -,,::, ¢ :::,; '<). -~~--~ I / ' I ' I . 0 . ' OPEN TO BELOW ~ 111 ~1ii_i _____ liiiiiT Q I I I l'I I 't I I I I I I I I I ~ mcHEN ~r I\ _J_ \ I::)\ d.5::. :J w 'l '°' w l)! MEZZANINE 2,400 S.F BALCONY BREAK ROOM 11111111 11 I II ~ - r ~ -~ ,_ ·,fl'A F:{ , _ _, - NF. CJ) D .. / ''!::-:icl' •. / ' / ICk\ ·•. ,..- OPEN . ' . .. / . / ', ,. © . (l ~ KITCHEN t ( SUP. L.J L.J ' . - ' M ' < \.IV CUST ' \__ 0 • 5 e~ ~UPERVISOR jsUPERVISOR - - - I 1:) 11 I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' 0 I TYP. 0 TYP . F iloi MANAGER MANAGER SUPERVISOR er,~ t', r, I I 'J\G It '· ON~c, I I ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I e f-,lf-- OPEN TO BELOW SECOND LEVEL WALKWAY TO PARKING STRUCTURE PART PART PART SENIOR I TIME TIME TIME T NSPECTORS SENIOR I. 12 INSPci-,10RS ADMIN. [2J°MIN. TYP. . SUPERVISOR MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER COPY MANAGER MANAGER 1' ' t---~~-=,~----,,CE=N=TE=R..--=::::r-i:!!:::=~-c==='=~::aFEREN3~ I ' ' ----G TYP. ~--------------,,,,,,,,-s-"' I -----------------------~ I I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' cb ' I ' I ' I ' I ' 0 10/22/18 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #1 03/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 07/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 IJ.ti. 11 hll A RC:V51DI~ JE5CRIF-C\J GENERAL NOTES A. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. LEGEND [~I>ff:::<}.:] MEMBRANE ROOF -METALDECK KEY NOTES QJ ROOF DRAIN 0 CONCEALED GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS 0 METAL DECK SHADE CANOPY G GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS 0 ELEVATOR 0 GUARD RAIL CONT. SURFACE 0 WORK STATION CUBICLE 0 STAIRS W/ LIGHT MONITOR ABOVE 0 SUN CONTROL SHELF METAL PANEL ~ WINDOW SHADE FINS AND AWNING ~ ROOF ABOVE ~ CASEWORK FOR COFFEE STATION AND SINK 16' 32' 48' ---I ___ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1''=16' 1 D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com A-1.1 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER [:AT I\ TIAL J,ti.T[ \ TIAL CJTH:::R: 1\_J_'RCV/\L FLOOR PLAN -SECOND FLOOR ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y RCl lXI 'IRl' F'ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JRic.'.NII\G i-.0. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~~ uo u 115 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 23 292923 + 370' - 6" + 392' - 0"+ 392' - 0"+ 392' - 6" April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 153 of 159 1 (~ t ~ l~ 1::;; )> 1::;; )> 1::;; )> 1::;; )> r r r r r r r r + 385' 00" + 385' 00" G)----£:9-_:!'IALL ----/ --2 / --T.O. RIDGE T.O. PLATE T.O. RIDGE T.O. PLATE -- --~ -~ - I ------0 ------0 ' ' ''2sJI' 12'::J I~ "['x/] ·, . ,---"·,. I II '··-.....__ IJI _,,,,,/ ''··-,,.11 11.---,--·-....... Ill __ ,,,, '"-JI ' P. Y¥.==' ' lllx/1111 l'//11 111-,11 lf~x:J I // ··-...__ _ /,, '--.. ,_ ///'•, ........ __ I lrxJ .1//l1 111>,<J[ '[' //II /~ ·--...... __ / ____ ,,, '--, _/ __ ,,x.._,, ( w .. ;,,,.'--l'L-) ~ ~ (==83'25:42 ' toP~ ---------StoP,E , ' "' "' I )':P., ~~YP., I IILIII I ~:><JI IILI l[:::<JI I ' I I '[><JI' l:S<J' '[><1 "IC><J' .,..-·--._ ,// ', --. -✓------··,., ' I 7 ' ' '~' 12'::J' I~ 2SJ ,,/ ~ 10 __ ,/ -~---Ill II _/ ·-.,. + 397'-8" ~ - ' / T.O. ROOF I . @--i=9-_:!'IALL 0 ----~ --~ -~ . --------- ' ·. 0 . . + 399'-8" 2 2 T.O. ROOF ROOF BELOW 4 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1:16 7 / . -, 6 0 1 ~ + 397'-8" ~ T.O. ROOF T . 1::;; )> r r 2 ~ 2'::J"' I··/ ···-.•. JII -P. I:><: 1111 1-~/JII //-...... ___ ~-2-5:---4; StCP~ ' ., l>"JIII -y· I~ .,----·r /// ·-----, ~-- - - - ~ i I / / -_,'I· LJ. ,;;/ :::;,, ,,_'<'/. / I I + 393'-11" T.O. ROOF 5 I , I 1 1::;; )> r r --+ 385' 00" / T.O. RIDGE -T.O. PLATE - -~ - ' I 'la' I >< 11 --✓-"'-111 I IIILII I I I l~J:::<:]11 I , I "' 1111::><]I I 2 -I I '[>(]' __ ,,,-✓ ·-,. ___ -------- GENERAL NOTES A. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. B. ALL ROOFING TO BE COOL ROOFING. C. MODIFY BITUMEN ROOF W/ TITLE 24 CAP SHEET LEGEND ~ MEMBRANE ROOF -METALROOF KEYNOTES [2J ROOF DRAIN 0 CONCEALED GUTTER [I] 6'-0" PERFORATED METAL MECH. SCREEN 0 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PER MECHANICAL 0 PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANELS 0 4'X8' ROOF SKYLIGHTS 0 ROOF AWNING EXTENSION OVERHANG 0 ROOF ACCESS HATCH 0 FACE OF WALL BELOW ~ TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER 1 D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com --~----_j_ ~-WALKWAY BELOW /l~\ I .. ,/·. '·\ \ ✓ \ / :::i ;:! a. ., 0 . . ~ ul v-.,'<"( RIDGE o' 16' 32• 48' 6 ~L,.I I GRAPHIC SCALE: 1''=16' A-1.2 ~10=,2~2~,1~8t-=R=E"-c,M~Cct-=C~.u~.P~.~S~U=BM~l=TT=A~L~#=1------------j------------t ~Hlc I _~",_1_·11_'\_,1 _r:_, 11_1'_(_' ,,_,, ~)_1_~_" l~l_\_ll~) I c,111-F; I .~3/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 I " ,, h \, "" 'h , 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 '1 ~LC WDc:K',; Lll 't,-: I \Ill\ I 07/31/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE.MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 CTH:::R :\P::iRC\.1/\L l)A II \ I IAI ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER RCl ROOF PLAN lXI 'IRl' F'ROJ[2T 1--10. 3572 JRi1.".NII--G i,0. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 116 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 24 29 STEEL GREEN SCREEN WITH VEGITATION23 23 2924 + 369'-0" + 367'-6" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 422'-0" + 367'-6"+ 367'-6" LEVEL 1 F.F. LEVEL 4 F.F. + 422'-0" + 394'-10" + 405'-10" + 383'-10" LEVEL 2 F.F. + 394' - 10" LEVEL 3 F.F. + 405' - 10" LEVEL 4 F.F. LEVEL 2 F.F. LEVEL 3 F.F. LEVEL 4 F.F. + 368'-6" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 392'-6" T.O. RIDGE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSEWAREHOUSEPARKING STRUCTURE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 154 of 159 + 399'-o" T.O. ~ECH. SCREEN + 395'-6" ~ T.O. PARAPET ~ + 381'-o" LEVEL 2 F.F. ~LEVEL 1 F.F. \_ -- 17 TYP. 7 TYP. 2 !"'EE '!"""'! l"""'l I""""' c'E" '!"'!"'II 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1 f--------- SCALE: 1:20 TYP. 7 I""""' """"'I ~ ~ ~ '!"'!"lj ~ l""""I ~ OPERATIONS BUILDING TYP. TYP. $ T.O. PARAPET ~ + 383'-10" GENERAL NOTES 0 NORTH ELEVATION 2 f--------- SCALE: 1:20 KEYNOTES " A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. QJ 6'-0" HIGH PERFORATED METAL MECH. SCREEN 0 PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANEL SYSTEM 0 4'X8' ROOF SKYLIGHT G ROOF EXTENSION OVERHANG 0 PATTERNED CMU BLOCK 0 COMPOSITE PANEL SIDING OVER STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION 0 ALUM./ GLASS CURTAIN WALL (TYP.) [}] ALUM. LOUVRE SYSTEM + 414'-0 .. T.O. PARAPET~ + 400'-" LEVEL 4 F.F~ + 389'-6" LEVEL 3 F.F~ + 379'-on LEVEL 2 F.F. LEVEL 1 F.F. 0 STEEL LIGHT SHADE CANOPY " ~ STEEL PREFABRICATED BUILDING W/ EXTENDED OVERHANGS (TYP.) ~ 6'-0" HIGH TRASH ENCLOSURE ~ 32' HIGH ALUM. FLAG POLE ~ WINDOW SHADE FINS AND AWNING ~ OPERATION YARD LIGHTS ~ PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTS ~ METAL SECURITY FENCE " D D D D D D D TYP. 10 ' ~ CONCRETE PANEL 17 II • " TYP. " 7 14 ~ GIP CONCRETE FRAME AND POST-TENSIONED DECK ~ GUARDRAIL 1201 ROLLUPDOOR ~ EXPOSED CONG. BASE/CURB (TYP.) 1221 VERTICAL WINDOW □ ' • 10 n TYP. " TYP. " TYP. < n TYP. 18 TYP. PARKING STRUCTURE 14 7 • II T'1P. ' 10 o· 20· 40• + 385'-0"$ T.O. PLATE 60' ~ c;. 1---1--~ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=20' 1 D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com A-2.0 ~10=,2~2~,1~8t-=R=E~,M~Cct---=-C~.U~.P~·=S~UB=M~l=TT=A~L~#~1-----------t-----t------t--------t------t _:j_:Hf--~~-1_·11_•\_.1 _r:_, 11_1•_r_· ,,_,, ~)_1_~_/ l~l_\_ll~) I c,111·F; I ,_ 3/11/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 , I " '" h \, "" 'h , 5/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL#3 '1 ~LC WDc:K',; Lll 't.-: l\lll\ I 7/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 1/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 5/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 7/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL#8 9/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 l)A I RE\/ISIO', DESCRIF'TIO~-::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RCl lXI 'IRl' F'ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.i\.'.Nli'-G r-.0. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~Cl _z uo u 117 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 25 292925 + 369'-0" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 369'-0" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 368'-6" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 392'-6" T.O. RIDGE + 392'-0" LEVEL 1 F.F. + 385'-0" + 368'-0" WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS BUILDING OPERATIONS BUILDING April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 155 of 159 ~ 'f'" ~ 'f'" $ + 383'-o" T.0. WALL $ GENERAL NOTES A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. ' 20 1B f-7'.]n ,v•] ~I ,rr·•:, -/ ' 0 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 :16 ' ' 13 ' 1 2 I I Ice ·- 1-L ~ ~ II II I II II I I - -,_ I I / ' II ' ) ' ' / ,J 0 EAST ELEVATION 2 f-------- SCALE: 1:16 KEYNOTES QJ 6'-0" HIGH PERFORATED METAL MECH. SCREEN 0 PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANEL SYSTEM 0 4'X8' ROOF SKYLIGHT G ROOF EXTENSION OVERHANG 0 PATTERNED CMU BLOCK 0 COMPOSITE PANEL SIDING OVER STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION 0 ALUM./ GLASS CURTAIN WALL (TYP.) [}] ALUM. LOUVRE SYSTEM 10 17 11 1 - ~ = ,v~']n r==="-1 II ~ ~ / / ' / ' ' / ' 21 ' II n n n /'~ t::::l --- 0 STEEL LIGHT SHADE CANOPY ~ STEEL PREFABRICATED BUILDING W/ EXTENDED OVERHANGS (TYP.) ~ 6'-0" HIGH TRASH ENCLOSURE ~ 32' HIGH ALUM. FLAG POLE ~ WINDOW SHADE FINS AND AWNING ~ OPERATION YARD LIGHTS ~ PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTS ~ METAL SECURITY FENCE " g ' I I I -- ~ II ~-I -~ ~ I I I II I 10 1v"'J,, ~ 1([.:?'"·7 21 ~ CONCRETE PANEL ~ GIP CONCRETE FRAME AND POST-TENSIONED DECK ~ GUARDRAIL 1201 ROLLUPDOOR ~ EXPOSED CONG. BASE/CURB (TYP.) 1221 VERTICAL WINDOW + 399'-o" ~ T.0. MECH. SCREEN"" + 395'-6" - T.O. PARAPET$ + 3s1·-o· - LEVEL 2 -F.F$ ----- ' " / T.O. RIDGE $ I $ - T.0. PLATE ----- T 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 NI ,'\ RC:\/ SIOI--J JESCF FTIO\I D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com 16' 32' 48' ---l ____ ~I GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=16' i;,.'\ff \ TIA CTH:::R 1\P::iRC\//\L cry AFP~OVAI ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y A-2.1 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RCl lXI 'IRl' F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 LlA, I - JR.A.'.NII--G i,O. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~Cl _z uo u 118 EV C A P A B L E EV C A P A B L E EV C A P A B L E EV C A P A B L E EV CAPABLE EV C A P A B L E EV CAPABLEEV CAPABLE 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 26 29 6,500 SF POLICE STOR. 2926 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 156 of 159 0------□ 0--- TYP. .. [!Jr-----7->-" I \._/ 0-- 2 3 ~' c===::::::::::;:::======:::J=====[}c=;= I ~====0==0=======c=;;====;==:::::;:::;::::===;==:::; \._ ,/\.. _) TYP. 0--o 945 SF STOR. I< 3 ============$===============::::;=LA CL™JAIRJ CLEANAIR/ CL~AIRJ 11-VANPOOL/EV VANPOOL'EV VANPDCUEV I SPEED RAMP : UP TO L2 I I (9.26% SLOPE) 24' n '" / 1··\ 1c1 ·,. ~o UP ~~ o, ~- +3.05 ~p z!, + 3.05 ~. ~-"\ •. ;~ ~-w ~p a. z !a 0 TYP. ;, ...J If) ~ 0---:n .... (0 ~o TYP. 5 GUST. llflO O~CY L CUST./CHARGING ~ ~~ 5 -§~ ~· 0-- ENTRY u p : ~~2.68% SLOPE)~) DRIVEWAY (0.74% SLOPE) >,.,, (1.81% SLOPE) +/-0.D0 + 0.50 0-- 0-- ONTRO ROOM / 8'-11" 9' N\11\ \10\1 // +0.75 9' 8' 9' N\11\ ;JNOOflfd/ \10\1 \10\1 ON 2 9' 5' 9' 9' 5' \10\1 7 ~~ll'id \10\11 \10\1 ;JNllRl\ld' I> ON / l 5' 6 0 LEVEL 1 1----- SCALE: 1 :16 GENERAL NOTES A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. KEYNOTES QJ ELEVATOR 0 CIP CONCRETE COLUMN 0 STEEL FRAMED STAIRWAY G BELOW LEVEL WALl<WAY TO OFFICE BUILDING 0 STRIPED NO PARKING ZONE 0 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL \10\1 "3/lOOdNVfl /i:IV N'i31J NOU\flS ~lmM--1:J UP +2.50 ) +2.50 +2.50 A3/700dN\IA "3/lOOdN\fA i\3/700dN\fA A3/700dNV/\ h3'700dN\IA """°""'' /8f700dN\IA /'"""/ ll:IW Nl/31:J ll:IIVN'l'37:J ll:IIVNV:17:J ll:IIVN'l'37:J ll:IIVNV37:J ~IVN'1'37:J ll:IIV Nlf:17:J ON 8 / NOILIJ'lS N0U\11$ NOll\J'lS NOUVlS fK)lllflS NOUVlS f«)lllilS SNlmll/H:J ""'""'° SNl;J~\IH:J ~l,J!l'o'HJ ;JNlmMH:> ~l;)H'o'H:J ;lllllmM-1::) i~~ -- 3 0 STEEL GUARD RAIL 0 STEEL SHADE CANOPY ABOVE W/ PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS 0 STEELACCESS DOOR •. / ·, = - 4 4 UP ENTRY DRIVEWAY +/-0.50 0f-- G)r--- 0 0f-- 0f-- :::,. ' 0f-- 2 TYP. 3 7 □~~ L - - - - : =!I/ ?//7 f-I \ TO L3 - 1/ / / I I / I I I I 8 24' / ' '/ UP( +/-12.00 -8'-6" >/~,[ I TYP. x / -· -/ '-. n 1 7/" \.~ACL ::: 7 / ~ •J TYP. 1 2 3 - - - - ---- 18 (5.75% SLOPE) 'UP + 17.25 / 12 I/ / I I I I I I/ 12 "/ I/ V L.,.../ (5.75% SLOPE) \ I + 17.25 18 -· ----..... n n n ' ~ 3 / TYP. / ' / 11/// • TYP. 0----n 8 n / / /, //-·. 1//x . . -= / /-==i----I==-== -~ -- 3 4 f----EJ 1 4 1 D < y C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com 0 LEVEL2 2 1-------- S CALE: 1:16 o· 16' 32• 48' ~ c;. 1---1--~ GRAPHIC SCALE: 1''=16' A-2.2 _1_ o=,2~2~,1=af.'.-'R=E=M~Cc+--=-C=.u~.P~. =S=UB=M=l~TT~A=L=#=1--------+-----+------I ~H le I _~~-1_· II_' \_.I _r:_, 11_1' _r_' "_,, ~)_1 _~_/ l~l_\_ll~) I c,1 11-F; I .Q.3/11/19 RE MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #2 • I " '1 h \, "/ 'h , 05/15/19 RE,KN C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #3 '1 ~LC WDc:K',; Lll 't.~: I \Ill\ I 07/31/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #4 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 RE\/15101, DESCRlr'TIO\I ::..:1 Y .A. 'I' iO\/f::.,_ ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE FLOOR PLAN RCl lXI 'IRl' LlA. I c F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.A.'.NII--G i,O. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 119 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 27 292927 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 157 of 159 1 0 □ 0 _J TYP. 9 0 0 ' ©f-------- 0f-------- GENERAL NOTES 2 e TYP. TYP. ' 5 7 L -V ~ ~ ~ ---~ ~ -- --I/ - --18 / L/ '-I (5.75% SLOPE) ~ \ TO L4 - v V 12 V TYP. □ [,] V I I I I 8 V 12 / V ', __ UP (5.75% SLOPE) +/-22.50 I n 2 ' 7 TYP. r 0 LEVEL3 1>------- SCALE: 1:16 18 _J ~ I 7 A ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. 3 4 ~ ~ ~~ ~ / / TYP. 5 / -/// 'UP + 27.75 0 / V / TYP. I I I V [,J-----n / 8 V / ./ I + 27.75 ' n ' 3 4 0\---- 0f------ (De-------- 0-- ©f-------- 0f-------- 1 2 TYP. TYP. ' ' 7 e 3 4 C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com □ ' I/ - -/ -- --/ -- ---- / 3 _J I I I 1/ I I I 8 I ' I - I 10 4 TYP. 2 3 I/ TYP. I/ ' I/ '==I==--% 8 --G I UP (5.75% SLOPE) ' 'J,+-------==::'.....__ ____ _______:,, I +/-33.00 ~ . V(/,l ~ -/, 18 IX~/ I 2 7 TYP. n r 7 8 0 LEVEL4 2~---- SCALE: 1 :16 11/25/19RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL#5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 Lli\ I l 11\JI 1\_ n + 38.25 I/~/ / L I ' 3 4 o· 16' 32• 48' ~ c;. 1---1---1 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1''=16' CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE FLOOR PLAN :: 1 v UICJl-.ll-! RCl lXI 'IRl' A-2.3 LlA. I - l)A 11 I\ IIAI l)A 11 \ I ,Lsl ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y F•ROJ[2T 110. 3572 JR.A.'.NII--G 1-0. 395-9 on-:::R ,\P=:,FCV',\L ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 1110 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 28 29 33 2928 April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 158 of 159 (P) CARWASH 16'X40' - - - --1::::=:::i.:=--------'=c.l/ 0 FLOOR PLAN 1 f--------- SCALE: 1 /8" - 1 '-0" z 2 I r---- N EQUIPMENT ROOM I~-0 I CXJ • 0 I . c.o ). l • "ro ~ '-... INSIDE GUIDE RAIL~ r---- 1 I c.o N N ~ J f 0 I CXJ BUILDING WALLS 0 MODULAR PLAN EXAMPLE 2 f--------- NTS / / / / \ \ / / 0 w 0 z zW -2 22 . 0 ·o u 1W ~d • (l:'. c.o ~. 0 I CXJ 1 \ / 20" I I I I 1 O' X 10' DRUM OR ROLL-UP DOOR REQUIRES 20" OF SPACE SECTION OVERHEAD DOOR ~-FOR MIN. LENGTH BUILDING FLOOR DRUM DOORS CAN BE INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDING AND COVERED FOR APPEARANCE WITH A BONNET ~ MODULAR ELEVATION EXAMPLE 0 NTS FINISHED CEILING OR BOTTOM OF ROOF BEAMS w u z ------------<( 0::: =='-'\.;:::--~'._-, t'5 0::: 0 I-• :r: c.o I 0..: o ::::i ~a w zo.. <Co Wo • <( :::J _J o o::: o u . I <Cw :r: .w z· ~_Jo::: -0 ~u 0 20::: Z LL • 0 0 LL ,,,. 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 05/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 07/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 09/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 IY,lf-IN 11/',I GENERAL NOTES A. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. KEYNOTES QJ MODULAR CARWASH SIMILAR TO WASHTECH LFO o· s· 1s· 32' ~ c;. 1---1--~ GRAPHIC SCALL. 1"=8' D < C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com A-4.0 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER CAR WASH DRAWINGS :: 1 v UICJl-.ll-! RCl lXI 'IRl' LlA. IC RE\/ SIOI\ DESCR F'Tl:JI\I ::~KJ EY: ::;;: \/ \.\1fJ R Y F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.A.'.Nli'-G 1,0. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u 1111 12/10/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 01/14/22 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 29 292929 + 391' - 6" + 370' - 6" + 391' - 6" + 369' - 6" April 5, 2023 Item #1 Page 159 of 159 I ~I===========~\ OUTDOOR STORAGE CANOPY 11,230 SF 1 /1================1 C ~ = = --. . J . . . . •, c>~~ . . ·v. C CC . ' -. . ' -. --. . -' -. ---. -. . ·, ---- FLOOR PLAN 1 SCALE: 1 /16'' = 1 '-0" 0 EAST ELEVATION 2 >-------- SCALE:: 1/16" = 1'-0" ('1.- ' ~ ) I ) \ , 7 2 T.0. STRUCTURE"' F.F. 2 ~ T.0. STRUCTURE F.F. 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 2----- SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES A. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW U.O.N. KEYNOTES QJ COLUMN TYP. 0 PARKING SHADE CANOPIES W/ P.V.SOLAR PANELS o· 1 s· 32• 48' ~~-~-~-~--1--~1 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=16' D < C.U.P. 2018-0022 Roesling Nakamura Terada Architects 363 Fifth Avenue San Diego, California P619.233.1023 F619.233.0016 www.RNTarchitects.com A-4.1 11/25/19 RE,MC C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #5 CITY OF CARLSBAD ORION CENTER J1/14/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #6 J5/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #7 J7/15/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #8 J9/09/22 RE C.U.P. SUBMITTAL #9 Ut\ll 11\111/\L IJAII l~,IIIA l)A 11 C TY A.PPRO\/A.I STORAGE CANOPY :: 1 v UICJi-.ll-! RCl ::~KJ EY: ::;;:\/\\1fJ RY __ lXI 'IRl' F•ROJ[2T flO. 3572 JR.i\.'.NII\G i,O. 395-9 ...J c:: ~ w I-I--z :lE wen U=> z Cl) QI--~ c:: 0::: ow Cl a.. <Cw [l'.l Cl) ~=> c:: ...J <( <( uz LLO 01- ~CI _z uo u