Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LFMP 08; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 08; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 8; 1988-12-21
- CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 8 Prepared For: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 Prepared By: Hofman Planning Associates Turrini & Brink, Planning Consultants Woodside/Kubota & Associates, Inc. VTN Southwest, Inc. Urban systems Associates December 21, 1988 INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN CONSULTANTS Hofman Planning Associates 2386 Faraday, Suite 120 Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 438-1465 Bill Hofman Sheila. Donovan Turrini & Brink, Planning Consultants 1920 E. 17th Street, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 835-1691 Doug Boyd Keith McCoy Woodside/Kubota & Associates, Inc. 2585 Pio Pico Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 729-1194 Jack Kubota VTN Southwest, Inc. 5451 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 931-1022 Dan Grothe Urban systems Associates, Inc. 4540 Kearny Villa Road, suite 106 San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 560-4911 Sam Kab CITY OF CARLSBAD Michael J. Holzmiller, Planning Director Philip o. Carter, Assistant to the City Manager Don Rideout, Senior Management Analyst Brian Hunter, Senior Planner Steven c. Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer LAND OWNERS Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation 12520 Highbluff Drive San Diego, CA 92130 Howard and Ida Kirgis 8332 Pinotage Court San Jose, CA 95135 KEL-CAL, c/o Cal Communities 38 Redhawk Irvine, CA 92714 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 21 29 42 BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS. PHASING PROJECTIONS ZONE 8 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES .... . PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........ . FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS MITIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . 56 58 58 58 63 63 LIBRARY FACI~ITIES . . . . . . . . . . 65 PERFORMANCE STANDARD ........... 65 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ... 65 MITIGATION . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 69 FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ....... . PERFORMANCE STANDARD ......... . FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS MITIGATION. . . . . . . . . .• FINANCING . . . . . . . .. PAR.KS • • • • • 72 72 72 78 78 PERFORMANCE STANDARD .......... . 80 80 80 85 86 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ... . MITIGATION. . . ...... . FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DRAINAGE FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . 91 PERFORMANCE STANDARD. . . .. . . . . 91 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS MITIGATION. . . . . . . . . .. FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIRCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . PERFORMANCE STANDARD . . . . FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS MITIGATION . . .... . FINANCING .............. . i . . . 91 . . . 99 . 100 . 102 . . . 102 . 102 . 121 . . . 121 - TAB~ OF CONTENTS CONTINUED F:IRE FACILITIES .............. . PERFORMANCE STANDARD ••.••••.•. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS MITIGATION •....•••.•• FINANCING ·• . • . . • • • • • • • • . OPEN SPACE . . . . • • . . • . • • . . • • . PERFORMANCE STANDARD .••••••••. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Page No. . • • 126 • 126 . 126 • • • 130 • • 130 • 132 . 132 • 132 SCHOOL FACILITIES ................. 133 PERFORMANCE STANDARD ••..•••.•.... 133 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS . 133 MITIGATION. . . . . . • • . •.. 138 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM. • . . . . . . ••.. 139 PERFORMANCE STANDARD. • . • . • ..•.. 139 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS . 139 MITIGATION . . • • . . • • • • • . . • • • 14 9 FINANCING • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . . 150 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM •.••••.•••... 152 PERFORMANCE STANDARD. • ••.•....• 152 FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS . 152 MITIGATION . . .. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 160 FINANCING . . . . . • . . .. 161 . FINANCING . . APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Kirgis Property Reports and Letters B. City Letter Regarding Build Out c. Park and Recreation Commission -Agenda Bill 488-5 D. Estimated Drainage Costs Pipe Flow Calculations E. Transportation Analysis Report ii . 164 . 172 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED F.School District Agreement G.Estimated Sewer Costs H.Water Design ParametersEstimated Water CostsEvans Point Reservoir CIP FundingWater Facility Bond I.References · J.l"= 200' Scale Constrained Lands Analysis iii **Appendix J is missing -LIST OF EXHIBITS No. ~ Title Page No. l Map Zone 8 Location Map . . . . . . . . . 8 2 Table Public Facilities Summary Chart . . . 9 3 Table Public Facilities Summary Sheet . . . 10 4 Table General Conditions For Zone 8 . . 12 5 Table Special Conditions For Zone 8 14 6 Map Management Zones and Quadrants . . . . 24 7 Map Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 8 Table Property Ownership Within Zone 8 . 26 9 Map General Plan Designations. . . . . . . 27 10 Map Zoning Designations . . . . . 28 11 Map Constrained Lands . . . . . . . . 30 12 Table Build out Projections . . . . . . . . 31 13 Table E~isting Land Uses . . . . . . . . . 33 14 Table Developing Land Uses . . . . . . . . . 34 15 Table Residential Build Out Projections 35 16 Table Non-Residential Build Out Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 17 Table Relocated Dwelling Units . . . . . . . 38 18 Table Build out Population Projections . . . 41 19 Table Citywide Residential Phasing . . . . • 45 20 Table Quadrant Residential Phasing . . . . . 48 -21 Table Zone 8 Residential Phasing 49 . . . . . 22 Table Citywide Non-Residential Phasing . . . 50 23 T.able Quadrant Non-Residential Phasing . . . 53 24 Table Zone 8 Non-Residential Phasing. . . . 54 25 Table Macario Canyon Park Phasing Schedule . 55 26 Map City Administrative Facilities . . . 59 27 Table City Administrative Phasing Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 28 Table City Administrative Financing Matrix . 64 29 Map Library Facilities . . . . . . . . . 66 30 Table Library Phasing Projections . . . . . 70 31 Table Library Financing Matrix . . . . . . . 71 32 Map Wastewater Treatm~nt Facilities . . . 73 33 Table Encina WPCF Capacity Analysis . . . . 72 34 Table Carlsbad Sewer Service Area Projections . . . . . . . . . 76 35 Table Wastewater Financing Matrix . . . 79 36 Map Pa~k District Boundaries . . . . . 81 37 Map Park Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . 83 38 Table Park Phasing Projections without Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 39 Table Park Phasing Projections with Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 40 Table Parks Financing Matrix . . . . . . . . 90 41 Map Existing and Proposed Drainage Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 42 Table Drainage Facilities By Phase . . . . . 95 iv ( 43 Table 44 Map 45 Map 46 Map 47 Map 48 Map 49 Map 50 Map 51 Map 52 Table 53 Table 54 Map 55 Table 56 Table 57 Table 58 Table 59 Map 60 Map 61 Table 62 Table 63 Map 64 Table 65 Map 66 Map 67 Table 68 Map 69 Table 70 Map 71 Map 72 Map 73 Table 74 Table 75 Table 76 Table LIST OF EXHIBITS continued Title Drainage Financing Matrix •..... Street Classifications •...•..• Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase 1 (1990) •••.••.....• Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I and II ( 1991) . • . . • . . • Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I, II and III ( 1992) . . . • . . Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I, II, III and IV ( 1993) • • . . Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I, II, III, IV and V (1994) Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Build Out (2010) ......•.• Locations Impacted By 20% or More Of Traffic From Zone 8 Build Out/ Fully Constrained General Plan .. Proposed Land Use and Trip Generation .....••....•.. Conceptual Development Phasing .. Zone 8 Planning Areas and Phasing Impacted Intersections ..... . Impacted Road Segments Level of Service . . . . . . . . . . Road Segment Peak Hour ... . Circulation Financing Matrix .... . Existing Fire Response Time .... . Proposed Fire Response Time .. . Fire Financing Matrix ... . Student Generation -Zone 8 .... . School District Boundaries •..... Existing· and Future Schools ..... School Locations. . . . . . . .. Sewer System (Regional) ... Residential Sewer Service Demand By Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sewer System (Local) ........ . Sewer Financing Matrix .......• Water Districts .•..•..•. Water System {Local) ..•...• Water System (Regional) ... Water Demand/Supply By Phase .•. Water Facilities Costs ....•..• Water Facilities Financing Matrix Facility Financing Matrix .•.• V Page No. 101 103 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 113 114 115 118 120 121 125 127 129 131 133 135 136 137 140 143 144 151 153 154 155 157 162 163 165 - - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 8 was prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan.l The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the build out projections for residential and non-residential development within Zone 8. Build out is the type and amount of land use planned for by the City's General Plan. The plan then phases or estimates the zone's development on a yearly basis until build out is reached. Phasing is done to predict future facility demands. The adequacy of public facilities is analyzed according to this demand. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes methods of funding needed facilities. Since the plan is a regulatory document, each facility section contains conditions to ensure that facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards. Mandatory compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the adequacy of facilities within Zone 8. Exhibit 1 on ·page 8 indicates where Zone 8 is within the City. Exhibit 2 on page 9 provides a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone a. Exhibit 3 on page 10 provides a one page highlight of the synopsis. FINANCE OVERVIEW In preparing this Local Facilities Management Plan, it has become clear that no one financing mechanism can satisfy the complex infrastructure requirements of this zone and of the northwest quadrant. However, a combination of financing techniques can address both the need for upgrading facilities enabling them to conform with the -adopted performance standards and ensuring conformance of future facilities as development occurs. A common set of goals for the financing of the major facilities can be stated as follows: 1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. 1 The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City council on 9-23-86 (CC Resolution No. 8797). 1 2. Provide for the implementation of financing techniques which consider the financial limitations associated with the high costs of infrastructure construction. 3. Provide for financing options which consider both the needs of the City and the property owners. The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identified the various ways that capital improvements could be financed. The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carlsbad generally fall into two categories those provided by developers as a condition of development approvals, and those provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, or other financing sources. It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction and maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects in the best possible way. The following describes some of the financing options available. A. Cash/Pay-as-you-go financing. The City. has used this method of financing to pay for most capital improvements constructed to date. B. In concept, the City charges the development community a series of fees which provide the source of income to pay for capital projects. When enough cash has been assembled, the City constructs the next capital project in order of priority. This method forces the City to delay construction of various projects until funds have been collected. These fees include: 1. Public Facilities Fees 2. Park-In-Lieu Fees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees 4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fees 6. Sewer Fees 7. Water Fees Special Districts collect their own various fees. Reimbursement Agreements. In certain instances, a developer may ask the City to move a project forward in time and to construct a facility before funds have been collected. When this occurs, the City could adopt the policy of having the interested developer construct the project based on a reimbursement agreement. The City would pay the developer back for the portion of the project that was to be funded by City resources over a period of time. Payments would commence at the time 2 c. - the City had originally scheduled the construction of the facility in the Capital Improvement Program. Moving the project forward in time is for the benefit of the developer. Therefore, the City's repayment would be limited to the cost of the public portion of the project and no interest would accrue to the developer. The use of this method of project financing does not eliminate the developer's obligation to pay City fees. The developer must still pay all City fees associated with a development. Credit for City Fees. When it is in the public interest to construct certain public facilities earlier than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go program, the City can consider giving a developer credit for fees that would otherwise be paid, up to the cost of the public improvement. These credits would reduce the amount of fees payable in future years from a certain development. Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid elimination of income from capital fees necessary to finance other projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits: Full Fee Credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project. Partial Fee Credit -Credit over time: In this option, the developer who builds a public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that credit is spread over a number of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for other capital projects while giving the developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement. 3 D. Debt Financing. A range of debt financing alternatives are available to the City. If it is in the public interest to push a project ahead and to construct an improvement before funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If the project is being pushed forward for the convenience or benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the cost of issuance and interest over the life of the debt issue. The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to determine the developer's responsibility to support these costs would be defined as the method of debt financing was chosen. Some of the debt financing vehicles available are shown below: Assessment Districts: Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a developer in the construction of various public improvements that may be financed through the use of assessment districts if there is significant public benefit from the improvement. In cases where a City contribution is planned~ the City may ask a developer to pay the City contribution. The developer could then be reimbursed at a later date or given fee credits. Special Benefit Districts: State law allows the formation of a variety of special benefit districts. These districts ~ay be used to fund the construction of parks, libraries, police or fire facilities, and street lighting systems to name a few. These districts may be formed by a vote of the property owners who then assess themselves for the cost of improvements. The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of debt service payments. City participation in a district of this type is possible to the extent of public improvements that would have otherwise been the responsibility of the City. However, the movement of capital improvements forward-in- time would require some concession from the developer in offsetting interest, debt issue, or other additional costs. Community Facility District: (Mello-Roos) Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist through Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facilities in conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts (CFDs) operate similar to assessment districts, but provide a more flexible tool for governmental entities to finance a wider range of public infrastructure, again through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facilities which may be financed by a Mello-Roos District include 4 - parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraries, gas pipelines, telephone lines and can be used to eliminate special assessment liens. These districts may also pay operating costs to the extent the services are in addition to those already being provided prior to the formation of the district. Revenue Bonds: The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to finance improvements related to utility functions or other City services that generate a fee for service, although other City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. If public improvements are being installed ahead of schedule to accommodate a developer, the City would expect the developer to offset many of the costs of such an issue as described above. Tax Increment Bonds: Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can be financed through the use of tax increment bonds. The Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for the construction of public improvements using this method of financing. A developer asking for public improvements to be constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agency's ability and willingness to defer other projects. Certificates of Participation: Certain public facilities such as buildings can be financed through Certificates of Participation. This is in effect a lease agreement between the City and another agency. A developer wishing to push projects forward might consider constructing facilities such as a library or fire station using this financing tool. The developer may be asked to bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of payment for certain improvements. General Obligation Bonds: The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bonds to fund the construction of public improvements. This can only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in an election. It is unlikely that the City will have the ability to use this method of funding public projects which benefit specific developments. Financing Policies The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan contains the following financing policies: 5 1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultimate responsibility of the City to fund, however, the priority for funding projects is at the discretion of the City Council. 2. Recognize that the Capital Improvement Program will play a significant role in helping to establish compliance with the adopted performance standards. Priority for the funding of projects should go to in- fill areas or areas of the City where existing deficiencies exist. 3. Agree to consider assisting developers with credits against future fees, reimbursement agreements, forming assessment districts, etc., only when it is clearly in the public interest to do so or to rectify public facility deficiencies and not to induce growth by prematurely upgrading public facilities. 4. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangements will be made based upon the City's plans for timing of certain public facilities. For example, if a developer wanted to put in an improvement that the City had not planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify an existing deficiency, the City would not consider beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until the 5th year, if at all. 5. Recognize that public facility improvements made up front or ahead of City plans by developers must provide the funds necessary to cover annual operating costs for the facility until the time the City had previously planned to provide the facility. 6. With the recent reduction in residential densities and overall restriction on residential development, recognize that it may be necessary to start charging fees to commercial and industrial land uses in cases where they are not presently assessed. With the reduction in residential land uses and density, it may be necessary to charge commercial and industrial to make up the deficit. 6 Financing Summary This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified certain facilities that will fall below the adopted performance standards without the proposed mitigation at some time during the course of build out. The developers in Zone 8 propose to provide mitigation to bring them into conformance with the adopted performance standards. The specific mitigation for each facility is shown in the corresponding facility sections of this plan. This plan also identifies when future public facilities are neesled as growth occurs to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. A complete financing section is provided at the end of this plan which provides a description of the facility improvements to be made, timing of improvements, cost estimates, and funding priorities. 7 • \ • \ • • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ • \ I ' I I I I I t----.Jr;=r::=al'l'liii;~- • ,., • Vicinity Map I • . I . GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGAAM-crTV OF CARLSBAD · _ ... 8 KAUFMAN and BROAD n■o, --· 1o1......, (;A -• ·-·-. .,, • --- • ·... &. ·---·-. • I • I • I • '· I • \ • ., I • • I • I • I • I • -.. I . -· I • I • • , I •-I • !..., EXHIBIT · - EXHIBIT 2 ZONE 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART LFMP 88-8 City Administrative Facilities Library Facilities Wastewater Treatment Capacity Pa~ks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools As of December 21, 1988 Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2006. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2003. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2000. Park District 1 (northwest quadrant) meets the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures until build out. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation until build out. Fire facilities meet performance standard out. the adopted until build Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard until build out. Zone 8 will meet the adopted performance standard until build out. 9 Sewer Collection System Water Distribution System Sewer facilities in Zone 8 will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures until build out. Water service to Zone a will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures until build out. 10 -- EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET LFMP 88-8 As of December 21, 1988 Facility Citywide: Conformance with Adopted Performance standard 1) City Administrative Facilities 2) Library Facilities 3) Wastewater Treatment Capacity Northwest Quadrant: 4) Parks zone 8: 5) Drainage 6) Circulation 7) Fire 8) Open Space 9) Schools 10) Sewer Collection System 11) Water Distribution System 11 Yes, until 2006. Yes, until 2003. Yes, until 2000. Yes, with mitigation measures. Yes, with mitigation measures. Yes, with mitigation measures. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes, with mitigation measures. Yes, with mitigation measures. 1. EmIBIT 4 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 LFMP 88-8 All development within Zone provisions of Section 21.90 of and to the provisions and Facilities Management Plan. a shall conform to the the Carlsbad Municipal Code conditions of this Local 2. All development within Zone 8 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 8 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standards. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 8 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.lJO(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 8 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 8 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at any time. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or development permits shall be issued unless an amendment to the CFIP or the LFMP for this zone is approved by the City Council which addresses those facility shortfalls and brings those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with. This includes all projects which were exempt under Section 21.90.0JO(c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 12 8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projects within Zone 8. All future projects within Zone 8 shall undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council. 9. Approval of this Plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 8. All future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. The plan does not guarantee any· specific residential density. 13 EXHIBIT 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 LFMP 88-8 AS OF DECEMBER 21, 1988 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES No special conditions are necessary at this time. LIBRARY No special conditions are necessary at this time. WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000: 1. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. 2. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. 3. The six member agencies shall form an agreement to ma~imize the utilization of available treatment capacity at Encina WPCF. PARKS 1. All development in Zone 8 shall pay Park-in-Lieu Fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 1. 2. Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 8, a Parks Agreement shall be required to include the following provisions: a. A letter of credit or other secured financing acceptable to the City in the amount of $770,500 guaranteeing the construction of 6.7 acres of parkland, from a financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney, shall be provided at the time this agreement is executed. 14 b. Park operating costs shall be provided either through a letter of credit or other secured financing from a financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney, or the establishment of a Park District 1 Growth Management Fee that would cover the operating costs for the Park. The amount of the costs and the time for which the developers in Park District 1 would be responsible for these costs shall be provided for within the Parks Agreement. c. The Parks Agreement shall be consistent with the requirements of the City's Growth Management Program. d. The Parks Agreement shall reimbursements, Park-In-Lieu credits. provide mechanisms for fee credits and/or PFF 3. No residential development will be allowed after 1992 unless actions have been taken to construct additional park facilities. DRAINAGE l. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone a, the developer(s) ·shall be required to: a. Pay any drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan; and b. Execute an agreement to pay any drainage area fees established in the forthcoming revised Master Drainage Plan. 2. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 8, the developer(s) must provide the City with a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the necessary drainage facilities required to serve the proposed development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15 Specifically, these facilities shall include the following: Location/Facility Area A: 1. 5411 Storm Drain 2. 3611 Storm Drain 3. Desiltation Basin Area E: 1. 30" Storm Drain Area 1. 2. I: 3611 Storm Drain 30" Storm Drain Area J: 1. 30" Storm Drain Area O: 1. 30" Storm Drain Area 0: 1. Desiltation Basin 3. Prior to the development of Macario canyon Park, funding of the following improvements shall be guaranteed: Location/Facility Macario Canyon Park: 1. Open Channel 7' deep 2. 72" Storm Drain 3. 54" Storm Drain CIRCULATION 1. An on-going monitoring program shall be established to evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, and demand on circulation facilities. The required timing of improvements is based upon the projected demand of development in the zone and the surrounding region. This timing may be modified without amendment to this plan, however, any deletions or additions to the improvements will require amending this local plan. 2. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, detailed intersection graphics depicting existing and build out conditions shall be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The required 16 3. intersection graphics are for those intersections identified as being impacted by 20% or more of traffic generated from this zone. These impacted intersections are identified in Appendix E. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing the construction of the following circulation improvements must be adopted: A. B. Improvements Needed Now None Improvements Needed by 1990 1. Construction of Cannon Road to half width Maj or Arterial standards from El Camino Real to Paseo Del Norte to include the following: a. Grade to Major Arterial standards b. Two full travel lanes c. Fully landscaped median d. Intersection improvements including installation of traffic signals at: (1) El Camino Real and Cannon Road ( 2) Cannon Road and Paseo D.el Norte Estimated Cost: $10,850,000 Completion Date: 1990 2. Installation of a traffic signal at the cannon Road/I-5. off-ramp intersections. Estimated Cost: $120,000 Completion Date: 1990 3. Construction of dual left turn lanes at Cannon Road and I-5 Northbound and Southbound. Estimated Cost: $93,000 Completion Date: 1990 17 c. D. E. FIRE Improvements Needed By 1995 Construction of Cannon Road to full width Major Arterial between Paseo Del Norte and El Camino Real. Estimated Cost: $1,728,000 Completion Date: 1995 Improvements Needed By 2000 None Improvements Needed By Build Out None No special conditions are necessary at this .time. OPEN SPACE No special conditions are necessary at this time. SCHOOLS Prior to the recordation of any residential final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, in Zone 8, an agreement shall be entered into between Carlsbad Unified School District and the affected property owner(s) that shall provide for the following: L The deeding of an acceptable school site to the Carlsbad Unified School District if it is determined by the District a school within Zone 8 is warranted. 2. A financing plan approved by the City and Carlsbad Unified School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 8 pursuant to condition #1. If any reimbursements and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall provide a mechanism to do so. 18 --. SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 1. No special conditions are required for Planning Areas "A" and "C" in the Kelly Ranch portion of Zone 8. 2. Special Conditions (except for Planning Areas "A" and "C") are as follows: a. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor from El Camino Real to the Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor must be approved by the City. b. Prior to issuance of any building permits in Zone 8, the City Engineer shall make a finding that the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will be in place and operational to serve development within Zone 8. c. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permits or building permits, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the necessary sewer collection system to serve the proposed development area must be approved by the City. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, the developers shall dedicate the Evans Point Reservoir site and appropriate easements to the Costa Real Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the District Engineer. If this site has been previously purchased by another developer for the purpose of dedication to the Costa Real Municipal Water District, reimbursement of all costs associated with the acquisition of the site and appropriate easements shall be made to that developer prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8. 2. All development within Zone. 8 shall pay the appropriate connection fee as required by the Costa Real Municipal Water District. 19 J. Prior to the recordation of a f_inal map, issuance of a --grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following water facilities shall be approved: Facility :t.eocatj,on [Agility: ~engtb (feet) Area E 14 11 Water Main 2,400 Area F 14 11 Water Main 800 Area G 14 11 Water Main 1,200 1011 Water Main 400 Area H 14" Water Main 700 1011 Water Main 500 Area I 10" Water Main 550 Area J 10" Water Main 850 Area K 10" Water Main 600 Area L 10" Water Main 500 Area M 10" Water Main JOO Area N 1011 Water Main 400 Area 0 10" Water Main 800 Area p 10" Water Main 250 Area Q 1011 Water Main 400 Area R 1011 Water Main 350 --~-Macario Canyon 12" Water Main 2,400 -- 20 -II. INTRODUCTION This Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP 88-8) completes the second phase of Carlsbad's overall Growth Management Program for Zone 8. Phase one of the Growth Management Program was completed with the adoption of the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (1986 CFIP). For purposes of public facilities analysis the 1986 CFIP separated the City into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones as shown on Exhibit 1 on page 8. A. PLAN OVERVIEW This LFMP provides a detailed description and analysis of how facilities will be provided in Zone 8 of the City from now to build out of the zone. The plan is divided into six parts as follows: I -Executive Summary: Summarizes the plan and II - III - IV - V - VI - VII - The most divided facility. facility. highlights all conditions proposed by the plan. Introduction: Provides an introduction to the format and content of the plan. Build Out Projections: Projects the ultimate amount of development in Zone 8, along with itemizing existing and developing land uses. Phasing: Attempts to project how and when development will be phased in Zone 8. Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements: Provides a complete description and analysis of when and how each facility will be provided and financed based on build out projections and phasing assumptions. Finance: Provides a summary of the financial alternativ~s available to fund each facility and a discussion of the LFMP's impact on City finances. Appendices: Provides the technical materials used in preparation of this plan. detailed part of the plan is Part v. This part is into eleven separate sections; one for each Each section provides a detailed analysis of the If a facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a description of mi~igation or alternatives, and a financing discussion. 21 Each facility section will conclude with adequacy findings. Adequacy findings summarize whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 8 Management Zone 8 is located within the north central part of the City of Carlsbad as shown on Exhibit 1 on page 8. The Zone is bounded· approximately by El Camino Real on the north and east sides, Palomar Airport Road to the south, and the Interstate 5 freeway to the west. Ultimately, the Zone will be bisected by the· extension ·of· Cannon Road from the freeway to El Camino Real. Zone 8 is one of six management zones in quadrant of the City. The zones which quadrant are shown in Exhibit 6 on page 24. the northwest comprise this Exhibit 7 on page 25 shows ownership of property within Zone 8 and Exhibit 8 on page 26 lists the property ownership in Zone 8 by Assessor Parcel Number and the respective acreage. These acreages were provided by the San Diego County Assessors Office and differ slightly from the environmental constraints analysis as shown on Exhibit 12 on page 31. As shown on Exhibit 12 on page 31, Zone 8 consists of three land holdings: 432.8 acre Kelly Ranch property, 21.9 acre parcel owned by Howard Kirgis, and 276.5 acres owned by the City of Carlsbad and proposed as · the site of the Macario Canyon Park development. C. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Within Zone 8, various residential densities are designated by the City's General Plan as shown in Exhibit 9 on page 27. The majority of land is designated Open Space, · in~l uding 2 7 6. 5 acres for Macario Canyon Park and 2 O 1. 8 acres of wetlands within Kelly Ranch. 8. 7 acres of land within the Kelly Ranch project area has been designated Recreational Commercial. The Kirgis property is designated RL (Low Density Residential) with a density of 0-1.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Within Kelly Ranch, 201.5 gross acres are designated RM (Medium Density Residential) at a density of 4-8 du/ac and 20. 8 gross acres are designated RMH (Medium High Density Residential) with a density of 8-15 du/ac. 22 - - D. ZONING DESIGNATIONS The City's Zoning Map designates the Kelly Ranch portion of Zone 8 as PC -Planned Community which establishes specific land use provisions through master plans and planned unit developments as shown in Exhibit 10 on page 28. The Kelly Ranch Master Plan (MP 17 4) was submitted and approved in a~cordance with this zoning designation. The Kirgis property is zoned R-1-30 for single family residential use. The Macario Canyon Park area is zoned OS -Open Space. 23 HWy 78 ---. -----------., ('. . \ . \ . \ . . \ ZONE 1 . \ . ZONE 13 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM--<:ITY Of CARLSBAD 24 .. _ ..... KAlFMAN and BROAD , .. o, -· ~ l.f 1 ........ (.A 9001' t,'-' ~--- MAR Management Zones Northwest' Quadrant LEGEND --Zone Boundary Quadrant Boundary ) EXHIBIT 6 ■ ' •>.•,Iii·· ........ ...... .... ~ ,.-~,. ,....,~ .. '•·· ... ·~" \ GROWTH MANAGfMENT PAOGRAM-OTY Of CARl.58.~D 25 KAUFMAN and eROAD IM.01 -"••...., 1,1>1 ....... f.11, 1001' ) Ownership LEGEND Ownership Boundary NOTE: ACRES OF INDIVIDUAL PHOPERTIES WERE DERIVED FROM SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. EXHIBIT 7 II . Parcel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9· 10 11 12 13 EXHIBIT 8 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP WITHIN ZONE 8 ownership KEL-CAL, c/o Cal communities 38 Redhawk, Irvine, CA 92714 KEL-CAL, c/o Cal Communities (address same as above) KEL-CAL, c/o Cal Communities (address same as above) KEL-CAL, c/o Cal Communities (address same as above) KEL-CAL, c/o Cal communities (address same as above) Kirgis, Howard and Ida 8332 Pinotage ct. San Jose, CA 95135 City of Carlsbad 2075 las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 City of Carlsbad (address same as above) city of Carlsbad (address same as above) city of Carlsbad (address same as above) City of Carlsbad (address same as above) city of Carlsbad (address same as above) City of Carlsbad (address same as above) APN Acreage* 207-101-012 83.12 207-101-015 2.54 2oa-020-0J2 1.23 208-020-033 4.44 2oa-020-02a 333.93 212-010-003 21.90 212-010-005 94.14 212-010-011 171.43 212-010-013 0.32 212-010-012 1.74 212-010-007 2.02 212-081-019 4.88 212-081-020 6.14 * Source: San Diego County Assessor's Office 26 ) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PAOGRAM--CITY OF CARlSBAD 21 KAUFMAN and BROAD ltt.01 -· -. ,,,. ....... ( '-too1!> ") General Ph'.111 LEGEND RL -Low Density RM -Med. Density RMH-Med. l-lgh Density OS -Open Space RC -Recreational Commercial EXHIBIT 9 ■ . Zoning LEGEND R-1 -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY 0-S OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT 10 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM·-ctTY Of CARLSBAD ■ . KAI.EMAN and BAOAO 111,111 -..-.... d I,.. ~ I,.. , ..... , ... ·-III.BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS To properly assess and plan for facilities to serve Zone 8 it is necessary to project the type and intensity of land use as the zone builds out. These build out projections define land use intensity and corresponding facilities demands. The basis for this build out projection is the existing Carlsbad General Plan. The methodology used in compiling this build out projection is consistent with that used in the 1986 CFIP. The methodology is briefly described as follows: A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE B. General Plan Land Use Designations were plotted on a l" = 200' base map. A reduction of this map is shown on Exhibit 11 on page 30. These designations were divided into sub- areas to ease in facility analysis. The gross acreage of these sub-areas was determined by planimeter measurement. Exhibit 12 on page 31 summarizes these a.creage calculations. Appendix J provides a constraints map at l" = 200' scale. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Consistent with adopted City policies and ordinances, development constraints within each sub-area were identified. Constraints that may have existed on land that is developed or has land use approvals were not included in this analysis. Constraints fall into two basic categories: 1) full and 2) partial. Fully constrained areas cannot be used to calculate residential density and are considered undevelopable. One-half the area of partial environmental constraints can be used in residential density calculations. Since full development constraints and partial development constraints sometimes overlap, for accounting purposes, the constraints are organized in a hierarchy beginning at 'A'- major powerline easement ar.d ending in 'J' -slopes between 25% -40%. When constraints overlap, only the area of the highest level constraint is calculated for build out projection purposes. Other underlying constraints may be found upon individual project review and would be further defined by subsequent environmental analysis. 29 ~· , I·). ~. V .! .-\~:\i> - ::-. ./ 1 · c .. ,. / \ ......... 1 - • . i --··;t'. \ !"" . • I J . ) ' / y,'- /, , r : .,, / -.............. ,.~/ // • , / f ~-'. ........... '~-, ). LEGEND ··,...... -' ' '. -.. -. ' COMSTIIAINlD UUC. --~ 1-J ---------· ~ 15'11. 10 •01'-SI.OPE ITJ•nlOQOvE&lOPE [~ ~ POWl:Ala<tE IEASEMENT m 0ACU.ATK:oN ELf:MIENl flllJIDINA't [TI ~ICAHI WEILAKJ ........ r~ ,_,.,.,,, 0 UJWIBGTVIO-tsWNJ BIIDMOOflrY(4·l[U',O a uaa.Nt«iHEO«ITVll-tsDUl',IQ ~, RECSIEATQ,I eot,M[ACJH. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-OTY OF CARLSBAD ZONE 13 1 \-._.. ti ,, , . \. 30 -~ kAt.hAN and BROAD ... , .......... w-........... CA NIIH Constrained Lands ) 'EXHIBIT 11 "21111,., ........ _...,..c.,...,,o, -(JH)l»,-1 -· EXHIBIT 12 ZONE 8 -LFMP BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS -CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS (AS OF 1/1/88) I ( ACRES OF DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINTS (1) f I I J-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I I KELL y GENERAL PLAN I I FULL I PARTIAL . JSCHOOLS I NET I I RANCH LAND USE I GROSS 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------1-------JDEVELOPABLEI I M.P. I DESIGNATION I ACRES I A B C D E F G H I I TOTAL I J J/2 I I( I ACRES I 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I (Kirgis>I RL TOTAL I 21.9 I 7.4 I 7.4 I 7.0 3.50 I I 11.00 I [--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 J (E) I RM-1 I 40.0 I 2.4 0.9 3.3 I 1.6 0.80 I 35.90 J J (G) I RM-2 I 15.2 I 1.2 2.0 3.2 I 4.4 2.20 I 9.80 I I (H) I RM-3 I 14.4 I 0.8 3.3 4.1 I 3.8 1.90 I 8.40 I I (I) I RM-4 I 16.2 I 0.8 0.1 0.9 I 1.4 0.70 I 14.60 I I (J) I RH-5 I 7.3 I 1.1 1.1 I 1.6 0.80 I 5.40 I I (K) I RH-6 I 16.8 ( 4.7 4.7 I 3.4 1.70 I 10.40 I I (L) I RM-7 I 4.1 f 0.4 0.4 I 0.8 0.40 I 3.30 I I (M) I RM-8 I 6.4 I 2.3 2.3 I 1.2 0.60 I 3.50 f J (N) I RM-9 I 5.6 I 0.5 0.5 I 1.4 0.70 I 4.40 J (0) I RM-10 I 14.0 I 2.5 2.5 I 2.8 1.40 I 10.10 I (P) I RM-11 I 12.8 I 0.6 0.6 I 3.0 1.50 I 10.70 J (0) J RM-12 I 23.7 I 10.0 10.0 J 4.6 2.30 J 11.40 (R) I RM-13 I 25.0 J 3.9 3.9 I 5.2 2.60 I 18.50 (A) (C) I RM TOTAL I Rt1H-1 I 201.5 I o.o 5.2 o.o 32.3 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o I 37.5 135.2 11.60 I o.o I I RMH-2 I 11.3 I I 9.5 I 0.8 1.3 I RMH TOTAL I 20.8 f 0.0 -0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.8 I 1.0 1.3 I 2.6 o.5o I 1.30 I o.o I 2. 1 I 3.6 1.80 I o.o I 146.40 10.00 6.90 16.90 ============================================;~==================================================================================! I TOTAL RES I 244.2 I 0.0 5.2 0.0 41.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 47.0 145.8 22.90 I 0.0 I 174.30 I =================================================================================================================================! (B) I 05·1 I 201.8 J 6.2 195.6 I 201.8 I I I 0.00 I I 05·2 I 276.5 J 29.3 11.9 38.6 196.7 I 276.5 I I I 0.00 I ··-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I OS TOTAL I 478.3 J 29.3 18.1 0.0 38.6 0.0 195.6 0.0 0.0 196.7 I 478.3 I I 0.0 I 0.00 I ·----·-·-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 (F) I RC TOTAL I 8.7 I 1.0 0.5 I 1.5 I 2.2 1.10 I I 6.10 I =================================================================================================================================I I TOTAL ZONE I 731.2 I 29.3 24.3 0.0 80.9 0.0 195.6 0.0 0.0 196.7 I 526.8 148.0 24.00 I 0.0 I NOTES: (1) CONSTRAINTS: A -MAJOR PO\IERLINE EASEMENT B -CIRCULATION C -RAILROAD ROW D -SLOPES> 40X E -RIPARIAN F -UETLANDS G -FLOODPLAIN H -PERMANENT BODY OF UATER 31 I -OTHER ENVIR. FEATURE J -SLOPES 25X TO 40X IC -SCHOOL SITE OVERLAY 180.40 1 Full environmental constraints are as follows: A. Major(~ 69 kv) power-line easements B. Proposed circulation element roadways c. Railroad track beds or right-of-way D. Slopes of 40% or more in grade E. Significant riparian, or woodland habitats F. Significant wetlands G. Floodways H. Permanent bodies of water I. Other significant environmental features as determined by the Environmental Review process. Partial environmental constraints include: J. Slopes between 25-40% in grade: only 1/2 of the area within slopes between 25-40% in grade can be used for residential density calculations. Also included in the constraint analysis is the programming of: K. Planned school facilities The approximate area and location of school facilities are indicated in the General Plan. The beneficial and efficient provision of these facilities requires a minimum area of land free of development constraints. Consistent with City and school district policy, the minimum acreage identified by the General Plan for school facilities was not used in the applicable sub-area's residential density calculations. C. EXISTING LAND USE Presently, the land within Zone 8 is undeveloped. One single family dwelling, the Kelly residence, exists in the northeast portion of the zone. The remaining area is used for agricultural crops, electrical transmission lines, or is undisturbed open space. Exhibit 13 on page 33 provides the location of the existing land use. 32 A. Residential: General Plan EXHIBIT 13 EXISTING LAND USE AS OF 1/1/88 Land Use Gross Sub-area Acres Project Name RM-8 6.4 SFD D. DEVELOPING LAND USE Project# N/A Phasing DU's 1 As part of the City Council's action in the Kelly Ranch Master Plan (MP 174), Master Tentative Map CT 83-30 was approved with 20 lots within Zone 8. There are presently two land use proposals on two of these lots that have been submitted for processing. Tract Map CT 85-26/PUD 91· encompasses Planning Area I of the Kelly Ranch Master Plan. Tract Map CT 85-27/PUD 92 encompasses Planning Area E. Both Map/PUD proposals were submitted in August, 1985. Exhibit 14 on page 34 has been provided to monitor the progress of development within Zone 8, including Kelly Ranch, the Kirgis property and Macario Canyon Park. The letter designations in parentheses that appear in Exhibit 14 on page 34 correspond to the Kelly Ranch Master Plan lot designations. E. BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS CALCULATIONS Both residential as of 1/1/88 for pages 35 and 36. follows: and non-residential build out projections Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 15 and 16 on Build out projections are calculated as 1. Residential Build out Projections The net developable acreage of each residential land use sub-area is multiplied by the adopted Growth Management control point as shown on page 37: 33 EXHIBIT 14 ZONE 8 • DEVELOPING LANO USES AS OF 1/1/88 ·-----------------------------------------------------------------····----------------················---------- I I I I DEVELOPING STATUS I I GEN PLAN I I I •••• ····················································I I LAND USE I GROSS I PROJECT I PROJECT I APPLICATION I TENTATIVE I FINAL I BUILDING II I I DESIGNATION I ACRES I NUMBER I ACRES I SUBMITTAL I APPROVAL I MAP I PERMITS 11 TOTAL I EXlSTlNG I l·························---····················································································I I RL TOTAL I 21.9 I I I I I I II I I I ······························· , ........... _·········-·----····················································I 1 ce> RM•1 4o.o I cT 83•3o 1...-r,.··r-1-"~f:-,z.--0 rL,,1 ~f"',,._.,..~ _(_; -1-·•:. 1 . 11 1 1 I CT 85·27+ 37.3 ~(LE.A~ I I I 11 I I I PUD92 I Ct9<i;) I I I II I I I (G) RM·2 15.2 I I I I 11 I I I (H) RM·3 14.4 I I I I 11 I I I CI) RM·4 16.2 CT 85·26'-f-15 .4 A-,._§l}.~-!,.I I I 11 I I I PUD91 I 'JY I I I II I I I CJ) RM·5 7.3 I I I I 11 I I I CK) RM·6 16.8 I I I I 11 I I I CL) RM· 7 4, 1 I I I I 11 I I I (M) RM·S 6.4 I I I I · 11 I I I (N > RM·9 5 .6 I I I I 11 I I I (0) RM· 10 14.0 I I I I 11 I I I (P) RM·11 12.8 I I I I II I I I (Q) RM·12 23.7 I I I I II I I I (R) RM·13 25.0 I I I I II I I I ····-···················.······--·····-·-·········-··········-···········-··-···················-··············I I RM TOTAL I 201.5 I I 52. 7 I 264 I I I 11 I 1 I I ······························· ·--·············································································I I CA> RMH • 1 I 11. 3 I I I I I I 11 . I I I (C) RMH·2 I 9.5 I I I I I I 11 I I I ·············································-·································································I I RMH TOTAL I 20. a I I o. o I I I I 11 I I I ===============================================================================================================I I TOTAL RES I 244.2 I 52.7 I 11 I ,=======r--.:za==========================================================================================·======( I CF> RC TOT I 8. 7 I I I I I I 11 I I I ···············································································································I l<B> os•i 1201.a1 I I I I I II I I I OS· 2 I 276, 5 I I I I I I 11 I I I ---·······················-·····-···············-········-···················-·--·--···························I I OS TOTAL I 478.3 I I I I I I 11 I I I ===============================================================================================================I I TOTAL ZONE I 731.2 I I 52. 7 I 264 I I I 11 I 1 I ==s======================================================================================================~=~aa: 34 - EXHIBIT 15 ZONE 8 • LFMP RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS (AS OF 1/1/88) I KELLY RANCH MP C1>1 I BASE I GENERAL PLAN I I RESIDENTIALI I LAND USE I NET I GMCP I BUILD OUT I EXIST-I APP. FUTURE I I DESIGNATION I ACRES I (2) f PROJECTIONS! DU'S I DU'S I DU'S f l·········································································I f RL TOTAL I 11.00 I 1.0 I 11 I I I 11 f l·········································································I I (E) RM-1 35.90 6.0 215 I I 215 I l CG) RM-2 9.80 6.0 60 I I 60 I I (H) RM·3 8.40 6.0 so I I so I I Cl) RM-4 14.60 6.0 88 I I 88 I CJ) RM·S 5.40 6.0 32 I I 32 I CK) RM·6 10.40 6.0 62 I I 62 I CL) RM·7 3.30 6.0 20 I I 20 I CM) RM·8 3.50 6.0 21 I 1 I 20 I (N) RM·9 4.40 6.0 26 I I 26 I (0) RM-10 10.10 6.0 61 I I 61 I (P) RM-11 10.70 6.0 64 I I 64 I (Q) RM·12 11.40 6.0 68 I I 68 I CR) RM·13 18.50 6.0 111 I I 111 I····················-···---·--·-·-··-···········-···--·-------···-······· I RM TOTAL I 146.40 I I 878 I 1 I O I 877 1-·---················-·-----·------·--··-······------------·--···-.--···· I (A) RMH• 1 I 10. 00 I 11. 5. I 115 I I I 115 I CC) RMH·2 I 6.90 I 11.5 I 79 I I I 79 I··-·--··············-----------·--··--··········-·-·---------······---··· I RMH TOTAL I 16. 90 I I . 194 I O ·j O I 194 1------········-·····------··--··----······. ······-·-----···---···-·······I I (A) RMH I 2.50 j 11.S I 29 I I I 29 I I (C) RMH I 2.50 I 11.5 j 29 I I 1 29 I I (0) RM I 14.00 I 6.0 l 84 I I I 84 j 1--·---·········-····-----·······················----···-··-·--········-··I I TRANSFER TOTAL I 19.00 I I 142 I O I O I 142 I 1=========================================================================1 I TOTAL RES · I 193.30 I I 1,225 I 1 I O I 1,224 I NOTES: (1) KELLY RANCH MASTER PLANNING AREAS (2) GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONTROL POINT 35 EXHIBIT 16 ZONE 8 • LFMP NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS (AS OF 1/1/88) I GMP NON· I RESIDENTIAL BASE NON· I I GENERAL PLANI NET LAND USE RESIDENTIAL! !ESTIMATED I LAND USE I DEVELOPABLE INTENSITY BUILDOIJT I EXISTING APPROVED !FUTURE I NOTES I DESIGNATION I ACRES I ESTIMATE I PROJECTIONS I SQ. FT. I SQ. FT. ISQ. FT. I l·······l····--·--···-·············································-··-·····-····················I I I RC I 6.1 I 30%1 79,715 I I I 79,715 I I 1-=••--------------=••---•=-==•-----,-d:------=-==•==•••=-=••---=---=-===-==••-=•-==-==1 I I TOTAL ZONE I 6.1 I 79,715 79,715 I - 36 2. 2 Growth Management Control Points General Plan Land Use Designation RL RLM RM RMH RH DU/AC2 1.0 3.2 6.0 11.s 19.0 The result provides the base residential dwelling unit build out projections for each sub-area consistent with the passage of Proposition E on November 4, 1986. Both existing and approved dwelling units are subtracted from this yield to indicate the amount of future residential development in the zone.· Relocated Dwelling Units The Kelly Master Plan was originally• approved for development of a total of 1,600 residential dwelling units. When this project was considered by the Coastal Commission in 1985, portions of Planning Areas "A", "C", and "D" which were previously approved for development by the City were required to be set aside for open space. During the preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, staff utilized the maximum number of dwelling units approved ·by the Coastal Commission (1,400 units) for • the purposes of analyzing public facilities in this zone and the northwest quadrant. Subsequently a detailed constraints analysis was done for the zone which allowed for a maximum residential development of 1,083 units. However, this did not include those areas determined eligible for development by the City but set aside by the Coastal Commission as additional open space. The Coastal Commission stipulated that the units lost as a result of this increase in open space could be allowed in other portions of the Kelly Master Plan. As shown on Exhibit 17 on page 3 8 , these areas were calculated at the Growth Management Control Point to determine the maximum number of dwelling units which could be allowed under the Growth Management Program. It is recognized that this number is not guaranteed and Dwelling unit per acre of non-constrained land pursuant to 21.53 and 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 37 is being used as the maximum potential residential units which could be built so as to assess the greatest future impacts on public facilities. MASTER PLAN AREA A C D EXHIBIT 17 RELOCATED DWELLING UNITS LAND DEDUCTED USE AREAS RMH 2.s X RMH 2.s X RM 14.0 X CONTROL DWELLING POINT UNITS 11.5 = 29 ll.5 = 29 6.0 = _li 142 In total, this zone plan utilizes l,225 units to analyze potential public facilities impacts. 3. Non-Residential Build Out Projections The net-developable acreage of each non-residential land use sub-area is multiplied by either .3 or .4 as described below. The resultant figures provide an estimate of ultimate land use intensity as defined by building square footage for each sub-area. This estimate is used for facility planning purposes. The Growth Management Program currently utilizes the O. 3 factor to estimate building square footage yields on either l) unapproved and unimproved vacant unconstrained land or on 2) urbanized underdeveloped non-residential sites. These urbanized underdeveloped sites typically exhibit significant man-made constraints to development. Primary constraints are: a) compatibility with surrounding land uses and b) proper interfacing with existing infrastructure and public facilities. Non-residential development in Zone 8 is described below. l. Kelly Ranch Within the Kelly Ranch area, the net developable area for non-residential building square footage is calculated as follows: NET DEV. ACRES 6.l X SQ. FT./ ACRE 43,560 38 X -DEV. FACTOR .30 BLDG. SQ. FT. = 79,714.8 - 2. Macario canyon Park The 1981 Development Plan for Macario Canyon Park proposed a mix of privately and publicly developed and operated facilities including an interpretive nature center, a botanical center, a commercial convenience center, a restaurant and conference center, picnic facilities, trails of all sorts, restrooms, a boat launch, and athletic facilities. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Commission is examining several proposals for revising the 1981 Development Plan for Macario Canyon Park. If and when one of these proposals is adopted, the chosen plan will undergo refinement and will eventually supercede the 1981 Development Plan. The three proposals suggested so far include a comprehensive sports complex, a golf course, and a cultural/performing arts center. The proposed sports complex could include a gymnasium, community center, and athletic playing fields. Economic Research Associates (ERA) has prepared a golf course feasibility study at the request of the City. This study was presented to the City Council on March 3, 1987. . The Council decided that the study adequately met the objectives of request for proposal (RFP). The Feasibility Study will be included in any new development plan. On April 18, 1988, the Parks and Recreation Commission directed staff to prepare the RFP for the revised development plan after the June 7, 1988 election. Funding for the golf course was to be secured by an increase in the City's Transient Occupancy Tax; however, when the election was held on June 7, and again on November 8, 1988 the proposed increase did not receive the necessary two-thirds vote and failed to pass. The City is currently seeking alternative funding sources for the golf course and once.that is determined, the RFP will be prepared. At such time as the Park Plan is revised, the Zone Plan will be updated to reflect these changes. 39 F. BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTION The build out population projection for Management Zone 8 was determined by applying a population generation rate of 2.471 persons/dwelling unit. The build out population projections for Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 18 on page 41. These build out population projections are used consistently throughout this plan for the purpose of predictj.ng demand for public facilities. 40 --. - EXHIBIT 18 • ZONE 8 BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTIONS (AS OF 1/1/88) I BASE I 11 11 I I I GENERAL PLAN I RESIDENTIAL I I I 11 POPULATION 11 I BUILD OUT I I LAND USE I DU BUILD OUTIEXISTING I APPROVED! FUTURE II INDEX !!EXISTING !APPROVED I FUTURE I POPULATION! I DESIGNATION I PROJECTIONS I DUS I DUS I DUS II (2.471/DU) II POP I POP I POP I PROJECTION! I < 1> I c2> I I I 11 <3> 11 I I I I l··············------···-----····-··-···----------·---------·----·····-··---·-········--·············-···············I I RL TOTAL I 11 I I I 11 11 2.471 11 I I 27 I 27 I I···········.••····-······································---·--.-·-··-·············································I I (E) RM·1 I 215 I I 215 2.471 11 I I 532 I 532 I I CG) RM·2 I 60 I I 60 2.471 11 I I 148 I 148 I I CH) RM·3 I 50 I I 50 2.471 11 I I 124 I 124 I I CI) RM·4 I 88 I I 88 2.471 II I I 216 I 216 I I CJ) RM·S I 32 I I 32 2.471 11 I I 79 I 79 I I (K) RM·6 I 62 I I 62 Z.471 II f f 154 I 154 I I CL) RM·7 I zo I I 20 2.471 11 I I 49 I 49 I I CM) RM·S I 21 I 1 I 20 2.471 11 3 I I 49 I 52 I I (N) RM·9 I 26 I I 26 2.471 II I I 65 I 65 I I CO) RM·10 I 61 I I 61 2.471 II I I 150 I 150 I I (P) RM·11 I 64 I I 64 2.471 II I I 159 I 159 l I CQ) RM·12 I 68 I I 68 2.471 II I I 169 I 169 I I (R) RM·l3 I 111 I I 111 2.471 11 I I 274 I 274 I I·················································· ·································································I I RM TOTAL I 878 I 1 I 877 11 11 3 I I 2, 168 I 2, 171 I l·············-······································································································I I (A) RMH·1 I 115 I I I 115 II 2.471 II I I 284 I 284 I I CC) RMH·2 I 79 I I I 79 11 Z.471 11 I I 195 I 195 I 1·················································-··································································I I RMH TOTAL I 194 I I I 194 11 11 I I 479 I 479 I l····--···························-···---··------····--··-·······--········································-·········I I (A) RMH I 29 I I I 29 11 2.471 11 I I 71 I 71 I I (C) RMH I 29 I I I 29 11 2.471 11 I I 71 I 71 I I (D) RM I 84 I I I 84 11 2.471 11 I I 208 I 208 I 1················-·················································-·················································I I TRANSFER TOTAL I 142 I I I 142 11 11 I I 350 I 350 I 1==============================================================================================-=---=====-==---=---==1 I TOTAL RES 1,22s I 1 I I 1,224 11 11 3 I 3,024 I 3,021 I ===============~==================~================================================================================ NOTES: (1) See Exhibit 10. (2) See Exhibit 12. (3) Source: 1986 CFIP. 41 IV. PHASING PROJECTIONS Phasing projections estimate when, where and how much development will occur in Zone 8 between now and build out. Al though difficult to predict exactly, phasing projections begin to make possible advance planning and programming of public facilities to assure adopted performance standards are continually met. Specifically phasing projections: 1. Project· estimated demands for public facilities on a yearly basis until build out. 2. Project and establish thresholds when and where public facilities improvements are needed. 3. By projecting facility thresholds allow sufficient lead time for facility programming to assure performance standards are continually met. 4. Through threshold identification allow the City to efficiently and effectively implement public facility improvements. The 1986 CFIP projects residential phasing to be 1,250 dwelling units per year. This projection was based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. The 1986 CFIP's public facility programming was based in part on this projection. Zone S's phasing projections consider the Citywide residential phasing projections used in the 1986 CFIP to identify public facility thresholds. A. LAND USE PHASING 1. Residential The residential phasing projections for Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 19 on pages 45, 46 and 47. The residential phasing schedule is intended to be used for projecting future need and timing of public facilities. It is a tool to allow the City to anticipate future public facility needs and to budget monies for their improvement. The projected residential phasing schedule is not absolute. The actual number of dwelling units to be built each year will vary depending on economic conditions. 42 Exhibit 19 also shows the residential phasing schedules of the adopted LFMP's. The adopted LFMPs include Zones 1-6, 11, 12, 19, 20, 22 and 24. Exhibit 19 shows the adopted yearly phasing schedules for these zones and shows the adopted 1986 CFIP Citywide projected phasing schedules. Exhibit 20 on page 48 shows a similar phasing schedule for the zones located within the northwest quadrant of the City. The northwest quadrant phasing projections are provided to make the review and future update and monitoring of quadrant specific facilities more manageable and easier to understand. Also, a Zone 8 residential phasing schedule is shown on Exhibit 21 on page 49 for use in the review and update of zone specific public facilities. Residential development in Zone 8 will occur in the Kelly Ranch and Kirgis properties. For the purposes of developing a phasing schedule, the proposed Kelly Ranch development is projected over a five year period, commencing in 1990 with build out completed by 1994. At this time, Mr. Kirgis has no plans to develop, but for the purpose of phasing, development has been projected in the last year. 2. Non-Residential The citywide non-residential phasing projections are shown on Exhibit 22 on page 50. Similar to residential phasing, these projections are estimated for purposes of public facility planning. Exhibit 23 on page 53 indicates the northwest quadrant non-residential phasing projections and Exhibit 24 on page 54 shows the Zone 8 non-residential phasing projections. Comparable to residential phasing projections, these exhibits are provided to facilitate future monitoring of this Local Facilities Management Plan. Non-residential development within Zone 8 will occur on a 6.1 net acre area (Area F) in the Kelly Ranch located at the intersection of Cannon Road and Faraday Avenue, and within the Macario Canyon Park site south of Cannon Road. Area Fis designated for Recreational Commercial uses. For the purpose of this phasing plan, it is assumed that this Recreational Commercial site will develop in the last phase, with build out complete by 1994. Based upon a maximum buildable area of 30% of unconstrained vacant land as established by the City, a total of 79,715 square feet could be built upon the Recreational Commercial site. 43 - . - The 1981 Master Plan for Macario Canyon Park indicates a 15 year build out of all recreational and commercial facilities, commencing in 1982 and ending in 1996. However, this plan has never been implemented and the Parks Department has indicated that the Master Plan will be updated. The Macario Canyon Park project has been included in the Capital Improvement Plan, 1987-88 to build out, which allocates $28 million from Public Facility Fee funds in 1997+. For the purpose of determining phased development for Macario Canyon, the 15 year build out is assumed to commence in 1997 and continue until 2011, as shown in Exhibit 25 on page 55. The phasing of development in Macario canyon is not described in detail in the Master Plan. Therefore, phasing for the conference Center and Artisans' Center has been assumed to be completed in equal increments. Because of the civic nature of the Interpretive and Botanical centers, the square footage of these facilities was not included in the total • 44 I I EXHIBIT 19 .CITY WIDE RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS * * * FOR FACILITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY * * * l······················-·····--·--··-----····-··--··-------·--------------------------------------- 1 STATUS I I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES I I I I I I IAS OF 1/1 I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I I I I I NOTES I I (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 1--------------------·-··----------------------------------------------------···------···---------- IEXISTING I I 1988 I 9,840 2,344 232 3,065 0 7,009 1,101 I I I I I I I I I····-------------·-······-··----------------·-···-·---------------------·----------------------··I !PROJECTED I 1988 I 250 100 3 BLD OUT BLD OUT 300 I I 1989 I 1n o 3 300 I I 1990 I 95 o s 258 I I 1991 I 81 36 2 186 I I 1992 I 81 36 2 11s I I 1993 I 81 36 2 113 I I 1.994 I 81 21 2 111 I I 199s I 81 s 81 I I 1996 I 81 BLD OUT BLD OUT so I I 1997 I 81 so I I 1998 I 81 so I 1999 I 81 so I 2000 I 81 so I 2001 I 81 so I 2002 I 81 so I 2003 I 81 so I 2004 I 81 40 I 200s I 81 4o I 2006 I 81 40 I 2001 I 81 40 I 2008 I 81 40 I 2009 I 81 40 I 2010 I 81 40 I 2011 I 81 2s I 2012 I 81 20 !BUILD OUT I 2013 I 81 20 1--·-····------··------------------·····---···--·--·--·-----····-··-······-··----···-------···---·· I TOTAL 12,220 2,578 252 3,065 9,218 NOTES: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221. (2} Zone 2 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9123. (3) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9084. (4) Zone 4 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9122. (5) Zone S LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, C.C Reso. No. 9188. (6) Zone 6 LFMP, adopted November 10, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9291. 45 -- I I EXHIBIT 19 (page 2 of 3) 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES I I !AS OF 1/1 I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I I I I <7> <8> <9> 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------. --------------------------- 1 1988 I 465 o 954 589 o 2 521 o o I I I I 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I 1988 I o 53 111 o I 1989 I o 432 436 I 1990 I 386 510 382 I 1991 I 325 375 296 I 1992 I Z58 275 185 I 1993 I 250 240 BLD Cl.IT I 1994 I 25 240 I 1995 I BLD Cl.IT 207 I 1996 164 I 1991 81 I 1998 BLD Cl.IT I 1999 I 2000 I 2001 I 2002 I 2003 f 2004 I 2005 I 2006 I 2001 I 2008 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I I 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I TOTAL I 1,225 "3,595 1,888 I NOTES: (7) Zone 9 phasing included because building permits may be issued prior to the adoption of a Local plan_ (8) Zone 11 LFMP, adopted February 23, 1988, c.c. Reso. No. 88-46. (9) Zone 12 LFMP, adopted February 23, 1988, C.C. Reso. No. 88-47. 46 EXHIBIT 19 (page 3 of 3) I II 11 I II TOTALS OF ADOPTED LFMPs II 1986 CFIP I l··········--···----·-··---·--··--···-------···----------····----------------------------------------------··········I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES II TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL II PHASED PHASED I I II ADOPTED CITYWIDE CITYWIDE II DU'S POPULATION! IAS OF 1/1 I 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 PHASED D.U. 'S POPULATION I I I I I II DU'S AS OF 1/1 11 I I c10, c11, c12, 11 11 I ···-···········-····---····---·--····---···--···-··.·---·-···---····--··-----··-···--·--····-·--------------------··I 1988 I 2 28 o 268 o 115 11 26,538 26,538 65,575 11 23,621 58,367 I I 11 11 I I 11 11 I ··---------·-------------------·--·-----·--------·-------·--···--·-··-·------·---------------------·--------·------·I 1988 I o o o o I 823 26,538 65,575 1,250 58,367 I 1989 I 139 110 182 o I 1,n4 27,361 67,609 1,250 61,456 I 1990 I 251 110 190 125 I 2,312 29,135 71,993 1,250 64,545 I 1991 I 454 110 161 125 I 2,151 31,447 n,706 1,250 67,633 I 1992 I 426 110 65 n I 1,610 33,598 83,021 1,250 10,122 I 1993 I 425 106 BLD OUT BLD OUT I 1,253 35,208 86,999 1,250 73,811 l 1994 I 410 106 996 36,461 90,095 1,250 76,900 I _._ .. _____ 1995 I ______ ---~~-~ __ 106 _______________ . _ 813 37,457 92,556 1,250 79,988 I 1996 I 351 106 752 38,210 94,565 1,250 83,on I 1997 I 256 106 574 39,022 96,423 1,250 86,166 I 1998 I 226 106 463 39,596 97,842 1,250 89,255 I 1999 I BLD OUT 106 237 40,059 98,986 1,250 92,343 I 2000 I 106 237 40,296 99,571 1,250 95,432 I 2001 1 106 237 40,533 100,151 1,i5o 98,521 1 2002 I 106 237 40,770 100,743 1,250 101,610 I 2003 I 106 237 41,001 101,32a 1,250 104,698 I 2004 I 106 221 41,244 101,914 1,250 107,787 I 2005 I 106 221 41,471 102,475 1,250 110,876 I 2006 I 106 221 41,698 103,036 1,250 113,965 I 2001 I 106 221 41,925 103,597 1,250 111,053 I 2008 I 106 221 42,152 104,158 1,250 120,142 I 2009 I 106 221 42,379 104,719 1,250 123,231 I 2010 I 106 221 42,606 1os,279 1,250 126,320 I 2011 I 106 212 42,833 105,840 1,250 129,408 I 2012 I 9 110 43,045 106,364 978 132,497 I 2013 I BLD OUT 101 43,155 106,636 I 134,914 I ···-----······-·······························-···················-················-·-······-·················-·---·1 TOTAL I 3,272 2,491 866 442 43,256 I Notes: (10) Zone 19 LFMP, adopted December 8, 1987, c.c. Resolution# 9322. (11) Zone 20 LFMP, adopted September 6, 1988, CC Reso #88·322. (12) This plan is under technical review and the phasing schedule is included for planning purposes only. 47 - EXHIBIT 20 NORTHYEST QUADRANT RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS * * * FOR FACILITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY * * ·• I II TOTALS OF I II ADOPTED LFMP'S I 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, I STATUS I I YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES II TOTAL TOTAL I I I I I I l0UADRANT QUADRANT I I I jAS OF 1/11 3 5 8 13 24 II D.U.'S POPULATION! I I I I I IAS OF 1/1 I I !NOTES: I I (1) (2) (3) (4) 11 I 1-------------------.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------, !EXISTING I I 1988 I 9,840 232 0 0 115 11 10,188 25,175 I I I I I 11 I 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I I I 1988 I 250 3 BLD OOT O O 10,441 25,800 I I I I _ 1989 I 1n 3 o o 10,616 26,232 I I I I 1990 I 95 5 386 125 11,221 27,742 I I I I 1991 I 81 2 325 125 11,160 29,059 I I I I 1992 I 81 2 238 77 12, 158 30,042 I I I I 1993 81 2 250 BLD OUT 12,491 30,865 I I I I 1994 81 2 25 12,599 31, 132 I I I I 1995 81 BLD OOT 12,681 31,335 I I I I 1996 81 BLD OOT 12,762 31,535 I I I I 1997 81 12,843 31,735 I I I I 1998 81 12,924 31,935 I I I I 1999 81 13,005 32, 135 I I I I 2000 81 13,086 32,336 I I I I 2001 a1 13, 167 32,536 I I I I 2002 81 13,248 32,736 I I I I 2003 81 13,329 32,936 I I I I 2004 81 13,410 33, T36 I I I I 200s 81 13,491 33,336 I I I I 2006 I 81 13,5n 33,536 I I I 2001 I 81 13,653 33,737 I I I 2008 I 81 13,734 33,937 I I I 2009 I -81 11 13,815 34, 137 I I I 2010 I 81 11 13,896 34,337 I I I 2011 I 81 11 13,977 34,537 I I I 2012 I 81 11 14,058 34,737 I I I 2013 I 81 11 14,139 34,937 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------_---------------------- 1 TOTAL 12,220 252 1,225 442 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- !PROPOSITION E RESIDENTIAL QUADRANT CAP NOTES: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221. (2) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, c.c. Reso. No. 9084. (3) Zone 5 LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, c.c. Reso. No. 9188. (4) Zone 24 Phasing schedule is included for planning purposes only. 48 15,977 39,479 EXHIBIT 21 ZONE 8 RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTION ***FOR FACiLITY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY*** I 11 TOTALS OF I 11 ADOPTED LFMP'S I l············································-·················I I STATUS I I YEARS I II TOTAL TOTAL I I I I I 11 ZONE ZONE I I I IAS OF 1111 ZONE 8 II D.U.'S POPULATION! I I I I I IAS OF 1/1 I I NOTES: I I 11 I 1-···-···-····--·········--···········-························I EXISTING I I 1988 I 1 II 2 I I I I 11 I I I I 11 I 1988 o II 2 1989 o 11 1 2 1990 386 11 387 956 1991 325 712 1,759 1992 238 950 2,347 1993 250 1,200 2,965 1994 25 1,225 3,027 1995 BLD OUT 1,225 3,027 1996 1,225 3,027 1997 1,225 3,027 1998 1,225 3,027 1999 1,225 3,027 2000 1,225 3,027 2001 1,225 3,027 2002 1,225 3,027 2003 1,225 3,027 2004 1,225 3,027 2005 1,225 3,027 2006 1,225 3,027 2007 1,225 3,027 2008 I 1,225 3,027 2009 I 1,225 3,027 2010 I 1,225 3,027 2011 I 1,225 3,027 2012 I 1,225 3,027 2013 I 1,225 3,027 TOTAL 1,225 49 STATUS I YEARS I I I EXHIBIT 22 CITY WIDE NON·RESIDENTIAL PROJECTIONS • * • FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY • * • LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I NOTES: I I (1) (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) I l············································································································I !EXISTING I I 1988 I 2,527,276. 266,499 1,685,013 0 4,992,315 841,434 I I··················· ......... ··································································. ···········I PROJECTED! I I I I I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 85,060 113,750 5,000 44,500 55,400 28,000 67,500 62,000 65,000 95,000 n,ooo 62,000 88,560 65,500 38,000 28,000 75,000 127,550 75,000 75,000 82,550 94,050 96,800 192,700 195,700 0 40,249 116,566 BLD OUT 141,134 94, 136 78,408 37,897 30,056 44,431 13,068 1,307 99,317 BLD OUT 0 0 0 89,211 BLO OUT 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 954,530 712,606 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,7.88 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 493,788 0 100,000 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 34,875 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUI LO OUT I 2013 57,084 493,788 34,875 I !============================================================================================================! I TOTAL 4,578,980 423,314 2,224,767 89,211 22,196,299 1,n8,434 I ============================================================================================================ NOTES: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September 1, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9221. (2) Zone 2 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9123. (3) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, c.c. Reso. No. 9084. (4) Zone 4 LFMP, adopted June 16, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9122, indicates a 2.1 net acre site, however, no phasing is provided. (5) Zone 5 LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9188. (6) Zone 6 LFMP, adopted November 10, 1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9291. 50 EXHIBIT 22 (page 2 of 3) YEARS I LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES I I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 18 I I <7> · <8> I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 1988 I o o o I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------···--------1 1988 I o 46,885 o I 1989 I o 285,789 o I 1990 o 285,789 o I 1991 o 285,789 60,984 I 1992 79,715 BLD OUT BLD OUT I 1993 o I 1994 0 1995 0 1996 0 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 2000 0 2001 0 2002 131,900 2003 0 2004 0 2005 19,000 2006 0 2007 109,400 2008 49,975 2009 4,725 2010 4,725 2011 0 2012 0 I 2013 o 1======================================================================================================1 I TOTAL 399,440 904,252 60,984 I ===========================================================================================--========= NOTES: (7) Zone 11 LFMP, adopted February 23, 1988, c.c. Res. No. 88-46. (8) Zone 12 LFMP, adopted February 23, 1988, c.c. Res. No. 88·47. 51 - - I YEARS I I I 19 EXHIBIT 22 (page 3 of 3) LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES 20 21 22 23 24 25 TOTAL ADOPTED NON·RESIDENTIAL SQUARE I I (9) (10) (11) (12) I FOOTAGE I l·····························································---·--------··············----·-I I 1988 I o o 230,334 o I 10,542,871 I I··--··-·--··-···················---·-------············-··-------·-·----··············------1 I 1988 o 11,812 I I 1989 10,454 372,940 I I 1990 325,829 306,132 I I 1991 BLD OOT 73, 180 I 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TOTAL 336,283 0 73,180 101,930 259,212 BLD OOT 1,434,780 I 0 1,245 ,481--+- 1, 971,848 + 2,101,129 I 1,580,966 I 1,221,756 I 1, 163, 766-1 1,329, 185 -t-· 1,052, 712-t- 1,153,722 842,481 605,663 590,663 617,223 594,163 698,563 556,663 603,663 675,213 603,663 713,063 661,188 627,438 630, 188 721,363 724,363 585,747 34,426,744 I ==--------------••=••-=-=••···--------=--=----=----===-•=-=-----------------------=-==•------ NOTES: (9) Zone 19 LFMP, adopted December 22, ,1987, C.C. Reso. No. 9322. (10) Zone 20 LFMP, adopted December 6, 1988, C.C. Reso. No. 88-322. (11) Zone 22 LFMP, adopted December 13, 1988, c.c. Reso. No. unavailable at time of printing. (12) Zone 24 LFMP, adopted December 20, 1988, c.c. Reso. No. unavailable at time of printing. 52 EXHIBIT 23 NORTHWEST QUADRANT NOH-RESIDENTIAL PROJECTIONS • • • FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY * • • ·----· ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATUS j YEARS LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES TOTAL I ADOPTED I 3 5 8 13 24 NON-RESIDENTIAL I SQUARE I I NOTES: I I (1) (2) (3) (4) I FOOTAGE I 1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-----------------1 !EXISTING I I 1988 I 2,527,276 1,685,013 4,992,315 0 0 I 9,204,604 I 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 I I 1988 I ss.060 141,134 954,530 o 1,1so,n4 I I I 1989 I 113,750 94, 136 954,530 o 1, 162,416 I I I 1990 I s ,ooo 78,408 954,530 o 1,037,938 I I I 1991 I 44,soo 37,897 954,530 o 1,036,927 I I 1992 I ss,4oo 3o,os6 954,530 79,715 1,119,701 I I 1993 I 2s,ooo 44,431 954,530 o 1,026,961 I I 1994 I 67,soo 13,068 954,530 o 1,03s,09s I I 1995 I 62,000 1,307 954,530 o 1,017,837 I I 1996 I 65,ooo 99,317 954,530 • o ,, 118,847 I I 1997 I 95,000 BLD OUT 712,606 0 807,606 I I 1998 I 77,ooo 493,788 o 570,788 I I 1999 I 62,000 493,788 o 555,788 I I 2000 I 88,560 493,788 o 582,348 I I 2001 I 65,soo 493,788 o 559,288 I I 2002 I 3s,ooo 493,788 131,900 663,688 I I 2003 I 28,ooo 493,788 o 521,788 I I 2004 I 75, ooo 493,788 o 568,788 I I 2005 I 121,sso 493,788 19,ooo 640,338 I I 2006 I 75,ooo 493,788 o 568,788 I I 2001 I 75,ooo ~93, 788 109,400 678,188 I t 200a I s2,sso 493,788 49,975 626,313 I I 2009 I 94,oso 493,788 4,725 592,563 I I 2010 I 96,aoo 493,788 4,725 595,313 I I 2011 I 192,100 493,788 o 686,488 I I 2012 I 19s,100 493,788 o 689,488 I I I 2013 I 57,084 493,788 o I sso,sn 1======================================================================================================================1 I TOTAL 4,578,980 2,224,767 22,196,299 399,440 0 I 29,399,486 I ===============================================================================================================--=-=== NOTES: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, adopted September,. 1987, c.c_ Reso'. No. 9221. (2) Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, c.c. Reso. No. 9084. (3) Zone 5 LFMP, adopted August 4, 1987, c.c. Reso. No. 9188. (4) Zone 24 LFMP, adopted December 20, 1988, c.c. Reso. No. unavailable at time of printing. 53 -- - EXHIBIT 24 NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS ZONE 8 * • • FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY * * * STATUS I YEARS I SQUARE I NOTES I I I I FOOTAGE I I 1-----------------------------------------------1 I EXISTlNG I 1988 I O I I 1-----------------------------··----------------1 J I 1988 I o I I I I 1989 I o I I 1 l 1990 l o 1 l I I 1991 I o I I I 1992 I 79,715 <1> I I I 1993 I o I I I 1994 I o I I I 1995 I o I I I 1996 I o I I I 1997 I o I I I 1998 I o I I I 1m I o I I I 2000 I o I l I 2001 I o 1 I I 2002 I 131,900 I I I 20031 o I I I 20041 o I I I 2005 I 19,000 I I I 20061 o I I I 2001 I 109,400 I I I 2008 I 49,975 I I I 2009 I 4,725 l I I 2010 I 4,725 l I I 2011 I o I I I 2012 I o 1 I I 2013 I o I I TOTAL 399,440 (2) ------==--------=~==---------=-=--•=-------=--- NOTES: (1) Assumes development area allowed based on City standard of 30% of unconstrained site. (2) Botanical and Interpretive Centers total an additional 8,000 & 9,200 sq. ft., respectively. 54 EXHIBIT 25 MACARIO CANYON PARK PHASING SCHEDULE (1) ------------------------------------------------------- Year I Facility !Acres I Structure (sq. feet) -------------------------------------------------------1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Park Entry Interpretive Center (1st Phase) Interpretative Center (2nd Phase) Interpretive Center (3rd Phase) SUBTOTAL Athletics Center Botanical Center View Restaurant Conference Center -meeting rooms -restaurant -guest rooms (1st Phase) SUBTOTAL Artisans Village -workshops -classrooms -shops SUBTOTAL Conference Center (2nd Phase) Artisans Village (2nd Phase) Artisans Village (3rd Phase) Artisans Village (4th Phase) 1.5 1.5 8.5 6.5 2.75 17.0 17.0 2,000 4,200 3,000 9,200 131,900 8,000 19,000 12,000 28,500 50,000 90,500 8,000 2,800 8,100 18,900 45,250 4,725 4,725 4,725 Note: (1) Schedule based upon 1981 Master Plan and projected CIP funding (1997+). 55 -V. ZONE 8 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 8 -addresses eleven separate facilities at three levels of analysis. Facility City Admin. Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Park Circulation Drainage Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Citywide X X X Level of Analysis ouadrant X Zone X X X X X X X Each of these facilities is evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance standard. For each facility analysis the following is provided: a. An illustrative map showing facilities discussed in the section and district boundaries; b. The adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times as development occurs; c. A detailed facility adequacy and planning analysis; d. A list of conditions necessary to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard; and e. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing mechanisms. Citywide facilities (City Administrative, Library, and Wastewater Treatment), have been analyzed in the 1986 CFIP. Analysis of these facilities are also included in this Local Facilities Management Plan to verify compliance with the 1986 CFIP or to suggest alternatives that assure conformance with the adopted performance standard. 56 This plan shows how each adopted performance standard will be complied with as development occurs within Zone a. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services. The plan also includes a complete-facility phasing schedule which is linked to public facility demands within the zone. 57 .--CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE-STANDARD l, 500 square feet per l, ooo population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis provides an inventory of existing and programmed City Administrative Facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. These facilities include both permanent and temporary structures. This analysis projects the build out demand for City Administrative Facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Exhibit 26 on page 59 shows the location of the existing and future City Administrative Facilities. A. INVENTORY l. Existing and Build Out City Administrative Demand: Citywide projected population comes from the 1986 CFIP. Zone 8 projected population comes from Exhibit 18 on page 41. Existing (l/1/88) Citywide Zone 8 Build Out Citywide (2013) Zone 8 (1994) Projected· Population 65,575 3 134,914 3,027 58 Performance Standard Demand (Sq. Ft.) 98,363 4 202 I 371 ' 4,541 . \ \ HOUSING AND REDEI/.ELOPMENT • GIIOW1H MANAGEMENT PflOGRAM-afY OF CAIILSIWI ICAlFUAN and BROH> .... -. .,.~..,.,,,..... ca .... \ \ . \ . ' . \ 9 ' . 59 ·--.. , :--:---.. ·-. I . 14 ---•. ,. , • j 1 ~ • FIRE & POLICE SAFETY CENTER ----.... --, ~_;·-·-: ; 18 • I . I -J. I . /"'\_\ . ( I -..~, I '·-• I ; i i • --..... , ; . . I . ., I _ _, . ,· -- City Administrative Facllltles LEGEND ■ City Administration FadUtles -Existing D City Admlnl1trat1on Facllltles -Planned EXHIBIT 26 f ■ -- Inventory of Existing city Administrative Facilities: The existing City Administrative Facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January 1, 1988 · are: City Hall (1200 Elm Ave): Main Building Finance Modular Purchasing/Risk Management Modular Redevelopment (2965 B Roosevelt) community Development (2075 Las Palmas Drive): Public Safety and Service Center (I) (2560 Orion Way): Police and Fire Vehicle Maintenance Totals Permanent (Sq Ft) 12,899 22,627 53,700 10,358 99,584 Temporary (Sq Ft) 2,700 1,800 4,500 Leased (Sq Ft) 3,200 3,200 ============================== TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES 107,284 Existing City Administrative Facilities as of January 1, 1988 exceed the performance standard. However, 2.9 percent of the total square footage is leased and another 4.2 percent are in temporary modular units. If the lease is terminated or temporary facilities are no longer used, thereby reducing existing City Administrative Facilities, this analysis would need to be re-done to assess compliance with the adopted performance standard. If compliance was not being maintained, all residential development in the City would be stopped until the appropriate mitigation could be implemented. 60 3. Inventory of Approved Future City Administrative Facilities: The adopted '87-'92 Capital Reso. 9271) identifies Administrative Facilities for years (1992): Improvement Program ( cc the following City construction within 5 Facility Public Safety Center (II): Design Construction TOTAL Square Feet 62,000 Funding Year '86-'87 $255,000 '92-'97 $3,455,000 Source PFF PFF/S/W3 ====================================== 62,000 $3,710,000 No other City Administrative Facilities are identified within the City's adopted CIP. Existing City Administrative Facilities plus those budgeted in the adopted 1987-92 CIP for construction within five years are as follows: Existing '87-'92 CIP Subtotal TOTAL FACILITIES Permanent (Sq Ft) 99,584 62,000 161,584 Temporary (Sq Ft) 4,500 4,500 Leased (Sg Ft) 3,200 3,200 169,284 B. PHASING 3 The citywide residential phasing projections on Exhibit 19 on page 45 are incorporated into Exhibit 27 on page 62. Exhibit 27 projects the adequacy of City Administrative Facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 27 shows that city Administrative Facilities currently meet the perform~nce standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard until 2006. PFF = Public Facilities Fee, S = Sewer Enterprise Fund and W = Water Enterprise Fund. 61 ) EXHIBIT 27 ZONE 8 -PHASING OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES (1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION) I RESIDENTIAL DUELLING UNITS ADOPTED PHASING ADEQUACY ANALYSIS II '86 CFlf ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IN I PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED YEAR OTHER IN TOTAL ADOPTED ADOPTED CITYWIDE CITY ADOPTED CITYWIDE ClrYVIDE ADOPTED IN I ADOPTED tONES ZONES ADNINISTRATION ADEQUACY/ • POPULATION CITYWIDE ADEQUACY/ STATUS (AS OF 1/1) ZONES ZONE 8 PLANS POPULATION DEMAND SUPPLY (I IIADEQUACY) PROJECTIONS DEMAND (INADEQUACY) NOTES: {1) (2) (3) (4) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·----------------------------EXISTING I 1988 I 26,537 I 1 I 26,538 I 65,575 I 98,363 I 107,284 I 8,921 II 58,367 I 87,551 I 19,734 ----------------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PROJECTED 1988 82J 0 823 67,609 101,414 107,284 5,870 58,367 87,551 19,734 1989 1,774 0 1,774 69,643 104,464 107,284 2,82D 61,456 92,184 15,100 1990 1,926 J86 2,312 74,026 111,039 107,284 (3,755) 64,545 96,817 10,467 (5) 1991 1,826 325 2,151 79,739 119,609 169,284 49,675 67,633 101,450 67,834 1992 1,373 238 1,611 85,054 127,581 169,284 41,703 70,R2 106,083 63,201 1993 1,003 250 1,253 89,035 133,553 169,284 35,731 73,811 110,716 58,568 1994 971 25 996 92,131 138,197 169,284 31,087 76,~ 115,349 53,93~ 1995 813 BLD OOT 813 94,592 141,889 169,284 27,395 79,988 119,982 49,302 1996 752 752 96,601 144,902 169,284 24,382 83,077 124,616 44,669 1997 574 574 98,459 147,689 169,284 21,595 86,166 129,249 40,035 1998 463 463 99,878 149,817 169,2114 19,467 89,255 133,882 35,4D2 1999 237 237 101,022 151,533 169,284 17,751 92,343 138,515 30,769 2000 237 237 101,608 152,411 169,284 16,873 95,432 143,148 26,136 2001 237 BT 102,193 153,290 169,284 15,994 98,521 147,781 21,503 2002 237 237 102,779 154,168 169,284 15,116 101,610 152.414 16,870 2003 237 237 103,364 155,047 169,284 14,237 104,698 157,047 12,237 2004 227 227 103,950 155,925 169,284 13,359 107,787 161,681 7,604 2005 227 227 104,511 156,766 169,284 12,518 110,876 166,314 2,970 2006 227 227 1D5,072 157,608 169,284 11,676 113,965 170,947 (1,663) 2007 227 227 105,633 158,449 169,284 1D,8J5 117,053 175,580 (6,296) 2008 227 227 106,194 159,291 169,284 9,993 120,142 180,213 (10,929) 2009 227 227 106,755 160,132 169,284 9,152 123,231 184,846 (15,562) 2010 227 227 107,316 160,973 169,284 8,311 126,320 189,479 (20,195) 2011 212 212 107,876 161,815 169,284 7,469 129,408 194,112 (24,828) 2012 110 110 108,400 162,600 169,284 6,684 132,497 198,746 (29,462) BUILD OOT 2013 101 101 108,6R 163,008 169,284 6,276 134,914 202,371 (JJ,087) ---------·······----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------····---------------------------···-------·--·-TOTAL ,2,012 I 1,225 I 43,257 I ----------·---------------------------------------------------------------·----·------·····---------------------------------------------------------------------···-------·---NOTES: (1) Dwell Ing units In Other Adupted Zane Pl-are those projected In the LFMP for Zonee 1-6, 11, 12, 19, 20, 22 and 24. (2) Source -Exhibit 19, Zone 8 LFNP. (3) Total adopted dwelling units Include the adopted zones 1-6, 11, 12, 19, 20, 22 and those as projected In Zone 24 and 8. (4) Existing citywide population Is the base population used for projecting Adopted Zane Plan Populatl-. (5) City Safety Center Phase II. 62 C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone S's demand on City Administrative Facilities as of 1/1/88 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being met and is projected to conform until 2006. III. MITIGAT:ION A. GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 If the adopted.performance standard for City Administrative Facilities is not being complied with then residential development in Zone 8 will be stopped until the standard is met. B. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 No special conditions are necessary at this time. IV. FINANCING The City collects a public facility fee (PFF) which is set at 3. 5% of permit valuation. This fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. In calculating the PFF the following expenditure~ were projected for City Administrative Facilities: Las Palmas Facility Public Safety Center Phase II City Hall -Future TOTAL $2,500,000 $3,400,000 $23,100,000 $29,000,000 In addition to the PFF funds, the adopted '87-'92 CIP indicates the use of $310,000 in sewer funds and water enterprise funds for part of the Public Safety Center Phase II. Public Facility Fees will continue to be paid by development in the zone. Thus, no special financing mechanism for City Administrative Facilities is required as a condition of development within Zone 8. 63 FACILITY ) EXHIBIT 28 ZONE 8 • CITY ADMINISTRATION FACILITY FINANCING AS OF 12/21/88 AMOUNT ESTIMATED CDST TIMING IFIRST FUNOING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES I CITY ADMINISTRATION I l·······························································································································································I I 1. Las Palmas Purchase I 22,627 sf I 12,500,000 I 1987·97 !City · PFF I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. Safety Center Phase II I 62,000 sf I Sl,710,000 I 1992·97 !City· PFF/SU I I I I I I I I I I I PFF=Publlc Facilities! Fees S= Sewer Enterprise Fl.nd I I I I l. New City Hall I NA I S23, 100,000 I 1997+ !City · PFF I I I W=Water Enterprise I I I I ============• I I I I I Fl.nd I I TOTAL CITY ADMINISTRATION COSTS $29,310,000 I I I I I I t·······························································································································································I I 1987·'92 CIP has a balance forward of SI0,589 fr0111 City Hall Remodel. I 64 - I. LIBRARY FACILITIES PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis provides an inventory of existing and approved Library Facilities owned and leased by the city of Carlsbad. This analysis projects the build out demand for Library Facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Future citywide library facility demand is projected based on the 1987-92 Capital Improvement Program, the adopted LFMP's and Zone 8. Exhibit 29 on page 66 shows the location of existing and future Library facilities. A. INVENTORY 1. Existing and Build Out Library Demand: citywide projected population comes frorn the 1986 CFIP. Zone 8 projected population comes from Exhibit 18 on page 41. Existing (1/1/88) Citywide Zone 8 Build out Citywide (2013) Zone 8 (1994) 65 Projected Population 65,575 3 134,914 3,027 Performance Standard Demand (Sq Ft} 52,460 2 107,931 2,422 / CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY/ ADULT -+__,..___ LEARNING CENTER . \ \ \ . \ \ --ICM..FMANand 8AOH) ~---... ~._ ...... CA ... N \22 . \ . \ . I . \ 9 I . 66 • I 18 j ; • ; i .... ; Library Facllltles LEGEND • Ubrary Faclllll■I-Existing 0 \,lbrary Facilities -Planned ____ -....3oo,_..::::::~-. "I·---,._• LA COSTA BRANCH LIBRARY . 1 j ' I I ; :--·--· I I I . • , I • ..J • ,· -- EXHIBIT 29 ■ 4 2. 3. Inventory of Existing Library Facilities: . Existing Library facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January 1, 1988 are the following: Facility Civic Center Library (1200 Elm Avenue) Adult Learning Center (1207 Elm Avenue) La Costa Area Library4 (7750 El Camino Real) Warehouse (6351 Yarrow Drive) TOTAL TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES Owned Sq.Ft. 24,600 24,600 Leased Sq. Ft. 400 4,500 2,000 6,900 ================== 31,500 Inventory of Approved Future Library Facilities: The adopted 1987-92 ·capital Improvement Program allocates funds for the acquisition of land and the construction of the South Carlsbad Library. This library is projected to be 58,000 square f.eet in size and be occupied for 'library use in two phases. Phase I consists of 48,000 square feet of library and is projected to open in 1992 with the remaining 10,000 square feet to be leased out by the City. According to city staff, the 6,900 square feet of leased library space will expire and be vacated when Phase I is completed. Phase II would terminate the lease to provide 10,000 square feet of additional library space to meet the performance standard. The South Carlsbad library site was approved by the City Council on July 7, 1987. The site is near the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road as shown on Exhibit 29 on page 66. According to city staff, the lease will end when the new South Carlsbad Library is constructed. 67 The following is a Improvement Program facilities: summary of the 1987-92 funding allocation for South Carlsbad Library: Capital library Description Funding Year Cost ('87 dollars} Land Acquisition Grading Design . Construction Debt Financing TOTAL 1988-89 1988-89 1988-89 1989-91 1988-2008 $1.1 million .9 million .6 million 8.4 million $7.1 million $18.1 million No other Library Facilities are funded in the City's adopted CIP. B. PHASING Existing Library Facilities plus those budgeted in the adopted 1987-92 CIP for construction within 5 years are as follows: Square Feet of Library Space 1988: Existing: Civic Center Library Adult Learning Center La Costa Area Library Warehouse . 1992: Added s. Carlsbad Library (I) 48,000 Adult Learning Center La Costa Area Library Warehouse 1995: S. Carlsbad Library (II) 10,000 68 Subtracted 400 4,500 2,000 Total 31,500 79,500 72,600 82,600 To assess when the threshold for future Library facilities will be reached, the phasing projections on Exhibit 19 on page 45 are used. These phasing projections are incorporated into Exhibit 30 on page 70. Exhibit 30 projects the adequacy of Library Facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 30 shows that Library Facilities currently meet the performance standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard until 2003. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone 8 's demand on Library Facilities as of 1/1/88 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being conformed to and is projected to conform until 2003. III. MITIGATION A. GENERAL CONDITIONS If the adopted performance standard for Library Facilities is not being complied with then residential development in Zone 8 will be stopped until the standard is met. B. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 No special conditions are necessary at this time. IV. FINANCING On July 7, 1987, the City Council took action for the acquisition, grading, design and construction of the 58,000 square foot South Carlsbad Library. Although the City Council has guaranteed the needed funds, the long term financing mechanisms may be modified at some time in the future. The adopted 1987-92 CIP has budgeted $18,112, ooo for library facilities. Of this total amount, in 1988-89, $2,032,000 is budgeted for land acquisition, design and construction of the South Carlsbad Library. $771,500 per year is budgeted for debt service payment which would be payable over the next 20 years. The primary source of funding will be Public Facility Fees (3.5% of building permit valuation). This fee is collected at the time building permits are issued for all residential, commercial and industrial developments. 69 EXHIBIT 30 ZOIIE 8 • PHASING Of LIMARY FACILITIES (800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATIOII) I RESIDENTIAL DWELLING IJIIITS ADOPTED PHASING MIECIUACY ANALYSIS II '86 CFIP ADEQUACY ANALYSIS STATUS NOTES: YEAR (AS Of 1/1) II OTHER ADOPTED ZOIIH II lOIIE 8 (Z) IN TOTAL ADOPTED PLAIS ADOPTED ZONES POPULATION ADOPTED ZONES DEIIAIID PROJECTED PROJECTED CITY\IIDf ADOPfED LIBRARY MIEQUACY/ SUPPLY U IIAOECIUACY) CITYIIIDI: PCPULATl!III PIIOJECTION$ CITYWIDE DEIWIO EXISTIIIG I PIIOJECTED 1988 I 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 200Z 2003 2004 2005 Z006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (1) 2,.sn 1 1 I 0 (]) 26,531 I (4) 65,575 I 65,575 67,609 71,992 77,705 83,020 87,001 90,097 92,558 94,567 96,425 97,1144 98,985 99,573 100,159 100,745 101,330 101,916 102,477 103,038 103,599 104,160 104,nl 105,281 105,1142 106,366 106,638 ,2,460 I 52,460 54,087 57,594 62,164 66,416 69,601 n,on 74,047 75,654 77,140 78,275 79,190 79,659 80,127 80,596 11,064" 81,533 81,982 82,430 82,879 83,328 113,776 84,225 114,674 85,093 85,310 11,500 I 31,500 ]1,500 31,500 ]1,500 72,600 72,600 n,600 72,600 n,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 82,600 sa,367 I 46,694 I (5) (6) BUILD CUT TOTAL IIZ3 1,774 1,926 1,826 1,373 1,003 971 813 752 574 463 237 237 237 237 257 227 227 2Z7 227 227 227 Z27 212 110 101 42,012 1 0 386 325 238 250 ZS ILD OUT 1,zzs I 8Z3 1,774 2,312 2,151 1,611 1,253 996 813 752 574 463 237 237 237 237 237 227 227 227 227 227 2Z7 2Z7 212 110 101 43,257 I (20,960) (22,587) (26,094) (30,664) 6,184 2,999 522 (1,447) (],054) 5,460 4,325 ],410 2,941 2,473 2,004 1,5]6 1,067 6UI 170 (279) (728) (1,176) (1,625) (2,074) (2,493) (Z,710) NOTES: (1) Dwelling units In Other Adapted z-Pl-ere those p10Jected In the lf,. for Zones 1·6, 11, 12, 19, 20, 22 and 24. (2) Source • Exhibit 19, Zone 8 LFNP. CJ> Total adapted dwelling unit■ Include the adapttld 1ones 1·6, 11, 12, 19, ZO, 22 end those es projected in Zone 24 end a. (4) Existing citywide population fs the base population ustld for projecting Adapted z-Plan Populations. (5) Phase I Expansion of South Carlsbad Library. (6) Phase II Expansion of South Carlsbad library. 70 51,361 61,456 64,545 61,631 10,n2 73,111 76,900 79,98& 113,071 86,166 89,ZSS 92,341 95,43Z 98,521 101,610 104,699 107,787 110,176 113,96$ 117,051 120,142 123,2]1 126,320 129,408 132,491 134,91\ 46,694 49,165 51,636 54,107 56,578 59,049 61,520 63,991 66,462 68,933 71,404 73,175 76,346 78,117 11,285 83,759 86,230 88,701 91,172 93,643 96,114 98,515 101,056 103,527 105,998 107,931 PROJECTED CITYWIDE MIECIUACY/ (IIADl:CIUACY) (15,194) (15,194) (17,665) (20,136) (22,607) 16,022 1],551 11,080 8,609 6,138 13,667 11,196 1,725 6,254 ],783 1,312 (1,159) (],630) (6, IOU (8,572) (11,043) (13,514) (15,9115) (11,456) (20,927) (23,398) (25,331) FACILITY ) EXHIBIT 31 ZONE a· LIBRARY FACILITIES FINANCING IIATRIX AS OF 12,21,aa AMOUNT ESTIIIATED COST TINING IFIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRO NOTES f•z••••••••••••••••••-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••--•--••••••~•=•===•••••••••••••••--•••••••••••I I LIBRARY FACILITIES I l·······························································································································································I I 1. library Remdel I Unlcmwi I 13,948,000 I 1997+ !City • PFF I I I PFFaN>llc Facllftfesl I I I I I I I I ,_ I I 2. library • For Build I I I I I I I I I out Pop,latlon I 15,331 If I 15,060,000 I 1997+ jetty • Pff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. library • South I I I I I I I I I Carlsbad I 58,000 sf I 118,112,000 I 19118·2008 !City • Pff I I I I I ............. , I I I I I I TOTAL LIBRARY COSTS 127,120,000 I I I I I I 71 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer treatment plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. INVENTORY Wastewater Treatment in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: The City of Carlsbad Sewer Service District, Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and San Marcos County Water District (SMCWD) as shown on Exhibit 32 on page 73. Wastewater Treatment is provided primarily at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) and also by satellite treatment facilities. Ownership as well as wastewater treatment capacity of Encina WPCF is shared on a percentage basis by independent sewer districts. Exhibit 33 lists the agencies and their permitted treatment capacity to Encina WPCF as follows: Exhibit 33 EICINA \l>CF CAPACITY AIIAl.YSJS the six six the I Sa tell fte Available capacity Rensining I I Percent Capacity at Treatment Treatna'lt Adjusted For Existing Treatment! I ownership Encina WPCF Capacity Capacity Leases Flow Capacity I I Agency I (HGO) (HGO) (HGD) (HGD) • (HGO) I 1--------------1---------------------------------··-·····--··------------------------------------------------1 I Notes: I <2> (3) I 1--------------1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I Vista I 30.00 6.75 6.75 4.35 3.67 0.68 I I Carlsbad I 25.40 5.72 1.20(1) 5.72 6.92 5.78 1.14 I I Buena I 4.59 1.03 1.25 2.28 1.90 1.74 0.16 I I San Marcos I 17.78 4.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 3.7'9 2.21 I I Leucadia I 16.67 3.75 0.75 4.50 6.23 3.95 2.28 I I Encinitas I 5.56 1.25 1.25 1.10 0.86 0.24 I I 1------------------------------------------------------------------··-------------------------I I TOTAL I 100.00 22.50 5.20 26.50 26.50 19.7'9 6.71 I NOTES: 1. Currently not operational. 2. SUllll8ry of leases: 1) Vista to Carlsbad 1.2 HGO; 2) vista to LC\.o 1.2 MGO; 3) Buena to Lei.ID 0.375 HGO; 4) Encinitas to Lei.ID 0.15 HOO. 3. As of October, 1988. 72 r· GAFNER WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITY• GROWTH MNWlEMBff PROGIWI-OTY OF CARLSBAD 73 --kAlFMAN and BROiM> .... _.. .. ~ • _... o-. .... A 0 DIS s ; 18 i ; • 6<.. EAOOWLARK RECLAMATION ••••• CIUTY UCA C -i, ISTRI ; · EA •••• • .. , 11 i I . -. I . -· I . I . • , I •-I • ,· -- Wastewater Treatment Facilities LEGEND --l( W•et-ater Treatment Facllltles -Existing Sewer Service Area Boundary ) EXHIBIT 32 ■ ......... -----c..•• ..._,""t_-" Currently, the Encina WPCF has capacity to treat 22.5 million gallons per day· (MGD). Ultimately, this facility will be able to treat up to 45 MGD. As shown below, Carlsbad Sewer Service District owns limited treatment capacity in a smaller localized satellite treatment facility: Carlsbad Sewer Service District: Percentage of Encina Capacity (25.4%) Calavera Hills Treatment Facility5 5.72 MGD 1.20 MGD TOTAL CAPACITY 6.92 MGD Capacity at the Encina WPCF is separated into two categories: treatment capacity and outfall capacity. This analysis will deal primarily with treatment capacity. The Encina Ocean outfall is a drainage line that transports the treated sewage (effluent) from the Encina WPCF and satellite facilities and discharges approximately 8,900 feet into the Pacific Ocean. Currently, the Encina Ocean Outfall has a 40. 5 million gallons per day (MGD) capacity. The outfall capacity is shared by six sewer districts and is projected to provide sufficient capacity to the year 2000. outfall capacity just as treatment capacity, is shared on a percentage basis by the six sewer service districts. 1. Existing Facilities: 5 The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two wastewater treatment plant facilities. Primary treatment capacity is provided through Encina WPCF which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies. The current rate of capacity of Encina WPCF is 22.5 MGD of which Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent or 5.72 MGD. The City of Carlsbad also holds.title to the Calavera Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The Calavera Hills Facility is not operational at this time and would require $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it operational. Operation at the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina WPCF is estimated at $135, ooo per year. The Calavera Hills Plant is not economical to· operate for treatment capacity except in the absence of needed capacity at Encina WPCF. currently not in operation. 74 B. PHASING c. Exhibit 34 on page 76 shows the existing and projected demand and treatment capacity for Carlsbad Sewer Service District. Existing demand is 5.78 MGD6 with current capacity at the Encina WPCF at 5.72 MGD. With the addition of Phase IV expansion of Encina WPCF in 1992, Carlsbad's capacity at Encina WPCF will become 9.24 MGD (25.68%). With the addition of Phase IV expansion of Encina, total capacity at Encina will become 36.00 MGD. 1. Phasing and Service Demand Wastewater treatment service area population projections for the Encina WPCF service district are depicted in the following chart: ENCINA WPCF PLAN SEWER SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS 7 Service 1980 1990 1995 2000 Vista 35,300 46,200 49,100 52,700 Carlsbad 24,400 56,500 69,000 81,500 Buena 5,500 15,900 22,800 24,100 Vista 8 0 3,000 6,100 6,100 San Marcos 20,800 45,000 49,000 53,000 Leucadia 25,000 48,000 61,000 74,000 Encinitas 7,00Q 8,300 8,900 9,500 ---------------------------- TOTAL 118,000 222,900 265,900 300,900 ADEQUACY FINDINGS Exhibit 34 on page 76 estimates the necessary treatment capacity needed to accommodate growth within the Carlsbad sewer service area to the year 1995. 6 7 8 Carlsbad Sewer Service District currently assumes a flow rate of 220 gallons/EDU. Projections approved by Joint Advisory Committee January 28, ·1987. Portion.of the City of Vista served by Buena Sanitation District. 75 -- -- ---- EXHIBIT 34 ZONE 8 CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND ANO AVAILABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY jSTATUS I YEAR CARLSBAD FLOW AT 220 I ENCINA LEASED TOTAL I I AS OF SERVICE AREA GAL/EDU I CAPACITY CAPACIT-Y CAPACITY ADEQUACY/ I I 1/1 EDU'S (M.G.D.) I (M.G.D.) (M.G.D.) (M.G.O.) (INADEQUACY) I !NOTES: I I (1) (2) I l·························································--····-·--------------------------------------- IExrsnNG I I 1988 I 23,227 5. 11 I 5.72 o.o 5.72 o.61 ,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 I I 1988 I 26,586 s.85 I 5.72 o.6 6.32 o.47 IPROJECTEDI I 1989 I 27,829 6.12 I 5.72 1.2 6.92 0.80 I I I 1990 I 29,012 6.40 I 5.72 1.2 6.92 o.52 I I I 1991 I 30,315 6.67 I 5.72 1.2 6.92 o.zs I I I 1992 I 31,558 6.94 I 9.24 o.o 9.24 2.30 I I I 1993 I 32,so1 1.22 I 9.24 o.o 9.24 2.02 I I I 1994 I 34,044 7.49 I 9.24 o.o 9.24 1.75 I I I 1995 I 35,2a1 1.16 I 9.24 o.o 9.24 1.48 •----•-•--••••-•-•••••-----••••--••-••L••••••••••-••-•----••••••••••--•••-•-••-•••----••••••-----••••••• NOTES: 1. Projected EDU's adjusted for an assumed three-percent vacancy rate. 2. MGD = Millions of Gallons per Day. 76 As can be seen on Exhibit 34, treatment capacity at the Encina WPCF would be reached approximately in the year 1988. Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would allow Zone 8 as well as the City's sewer service area to meet the performance standard. The City Council in May 1987 adopted an action plan for sewer treatment capacity. This action plan is as follows: 1. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. 2. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. 3. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flow has reached 5.25 MGD, actively seek lease capacity from other Encina agencies. 4. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed with activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost effective treatment measures are no longer feasible and when Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached. On September 13, 1988 the Carlsbad City Council approved a Treatment Capacity Lease Agreement with the City of Vista. The lease provides up to 1. 2 MGD of additional Treatment Capacity at Encina WPCF for the Carlsbad Sewer Service District. As indicated on Exhibit 34, this lease will provide adequate Treatment Capacity until the completion of the Phase IV Expansion of the Encina WPCF. A condition of the Lease Agreement with Vista is that Carlsbad complete and prepare for the activation of the Calavera Hills Treatment/Reclamation Facility. This is also in compliance with the city's action plan previously discussed. The City is currently pursuing alternatives to best activate this treatment facility in conformance with the terms of the lease agreement. With the increase in available treatment capacity due to the lease with the City of Vista, there exists adequate treatment capacity for the Carlsbad Sewer Service District so that conformance with the. adopted performance standard will be maintained. 77 . - III. MITIGATION The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000: 1. Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. 2. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. 3. The six member agencies shall form an agreement to maximize the utilization of available treatment capacity at Encina WPCF. IV. FINANCING Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. Carlsbad Sewer Service District has projected Capital Improvement funds to provide for needed facilities •. Exhibit 35 on.page 79 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the facilities to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing, budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options . 78 EXHIIIT 35 ZONE 8 -IIASTE\IATEI FIIIAIICIIIG MTRIX AS OF 12/21/48 ESTIMTEO I FACILITY COST TINIIIG IFIIST FUNDING OPTl°"S TIIIRD I I NOTES I l••-•••--■-mmm••-•m••rm•••••••--~szaaa:azmrm■■m■amrmm-wwwaww•,.-•m-mm■■mm■■••m-rmm.,■-----,_ .. _ .... ,._,...1 I IIASTEUATEI FACILITIES I 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·--·-----------.------------·-----1 I 1. Enc:11'111 outfall '"r■de I Sl,800,000 I 1992-1997 I Seller ,_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I z. Enc:11'111 outfall Pulp IJ I 1525,000 I 1917-U I Seller •-I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. Enc:11'111 Phue IV E.,-.lan I S11,Z78,000 I 1987·91 I Seller fen I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. Enc:11'111 Solids ll■l'llllllant I 110,000,000 I 1917-91 I S-r ,_ I I I I I ■----•••I I I I I I I TOTAL IIASTEIIATEI COSTS 530,403,000 I I I I I I 79 .- PARK FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1,000 population within the Park District, must be scheduled for con- struction within a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four Park Districts which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Management Zone 8 is located in Park District 1 in the City of Carlsbad as shown on Exhibit 36 on page 81. A. INVENTORY 1. Existing and Build Out Park Demand: The projected population for Park District 1 comes from Exhibit 20 on page 48. Park District 1 Existing (1/1/88) Build Out (2013) Projected Population 25,175 39,479 Performance Standard Park Demand (acres) 75.52 118.44 Of this, the Zone 8 existing and projected build out population and demand is: Zone 8 Existing (1/1/88) Build Out (1994) 80 Projected Population 3 3,027 Performance Standard Park Demand (acres) .01 9.08 ·--' :--:--•, .-. I • 14 COSTA CR:lWlH MNW3EMEHT PROGMM-QTY OF CNl.SIW> 81 -~ kAlFMAN and BA0H) -...... ~ -,...._ CA ..... ·-----, • ...... , • • I • ..... ; . I ; ; . . --I . -· I . I . ., I _ _, . ,· -- Park District Boundaries LEGEND PARK DISTRICT 1 NORTHWEST QUADRANT 2 3 4 11111111 NORTHEAST QUADRANT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT SOUTHEAST QUADRANT DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 36 f ■ _,,,., .. __ _ ___ c.. .. . --tfwt ... _ 2. Inventory of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 1: The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on June 20, 1988 by the Parks and Recreation commission. These parks are shown on Exhibit 37 on page 83. These are the following: Community Parks Holiday Laguna. Riviera Magee Hosp SUBTOTAL Special Use Areas Pio Pico Oak Maxton Brown Rotary Buena Vista CHS Tennis courts Swi1:1 Complex Chase Field H.s.c.c. Jefferson Elem. Kelly Elementary Magnolia Pine Elementary Valley Jr. High Car Country Cannon Pine Senior Center SUBTOTAL Type Active Active· Active Passive/ Natural Type Passive Passive Passive Passive Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Active Passive Active Active Ownership City City City City Ownership City City City City CUSD CUSD City City City CUSD CUSD CUSD CUSD CUSD City SDGE City TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES 82 Acres 5.4 6.8 3.0 27.0 42.2 Acres 0.8 0.4 1.4 1.0 2.3 3.0 3.0 2.3 1.0 2.6 2.8 4.1 2.0 7.5 1.0 1.7 3.0 39.9 === 82.1 acres f"' ' ~'-4'..' ~. ... ... MAGEE PARK____._■• ... MACARIO CANYON PARK GIIOWlM MANAGEMENT PRCJftAM--aTY OF CARLSBAD -~ KAlFMAN and BfllAD .... --. ............. CA -U . \ . \ • \ . \ . \ . \ . I . I . 83 CALAVERA HILLS '. :--:--.. --. I . I . I ;_ ---..... , i .... D . , • D • • • . I ; . I . I. I . \ . I • Parks LEGEND ■ Olmmunlty Parka -Exlallng D Community Parka -Plamed • Special Use Areas '111 NORTHWEST QUADRANT BOY ■----;:--JL._--,!--LA COSTA CANYON PARK . I . I . I ------STAGECOACH PARK -. I EXHIBIT 37 . -· I . I . • , I _ _, . ,· --_, ..... ~-----c-•---·· ... -- I • B. 3. 4. Inventory of Projected Future Park Facilities: The inventory of projected park facilities adopted on June 20, 1988 are shown on Exhibit 37 and are as follows: Community Parks ~ Ownership Acres Macario Park Active City 25.0 Special Use Areas ~ Ownership Acres Cannon Lake Active City 6.7 Pine School Active CUSD 7.0 Maxton Brown Extension Active City 2.1 ==== TOTAL 40.8 Projected Build out AdeguacyLinadeguacy of Park Fagilities: 82.1 acres of existing park facilities are operational and can be applied tow:ard meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The 4 o. 8 acres of projected future park facilities are proposed facilities per the City's adopted Parks Inventory. The '87-'92 CIP funds future park facilities in this quadrant. Existing Facilities Proposed Future Facilities Total Build Out Park Facilities Park District 1 Build Out Demand ~rejected Park District 1 Adequacy/Inadequacy 82.1 40.8 122.9 acres 118.4 ----- 4.5 acres PHASING Exhibit 38 on page 88 shows Park District 1 supply. and demand based on Park District 1 population projections. Exhibit 38 shows that existing park facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 1 until 1990. Starting in 1990 park facilities do not meet the performance standard until 1997 without the proposed mitigation. 84 As shown on Exhibit 39 on page 89, the park standard is projected to be met through 1992 with the following assumptions: l. Zone 8 will provide a letter of credit or some other secured financing acceptable to the City guaranteeing the improvement and operating expenses for 6.7 acres of park land. 2. Zone 24 will provide a letter of credit or some other secured financing acceptable to the City guaranteeing the improvement and operating expenses for 2.1 acres of park land. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Park District 1 conforms with the adopted performance standard until 1990. From 1990 through 1997, Park District 1 does not conform to the adopted performance standard without the proposed mitigation. III. MITIGATION Mitigation of the projected Park District 1 deficiency involves the City of Carlsbad's Capital Improvement Program and the proposed mitigation. Exhibit 39 shows the conformance of park supply with park demand with the proposed mitigation. A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8: 1. All development shall pay Park-in-Lieu Fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 1. 2. Prior · to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone a, a Parks Agreement shall be required to include the following provisions: a. A letter of credit or some other secured financing acceptable to the City in the amount of $770,500 guaranteeing the construction of 6.7 acres of parkland, from a financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney at ·the time this agreement is executed. 85 ---- ,- b. Park operating costs shall be provided either through a letter of credit or some other secured financing from a financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney or the establishment of a Park District 1 Growth Management Fee that would cover the operating costs for the Park. The amount of the costs and the time for which the developers in Park District 1 would be responsible for these costs shall be provided for within the Parks Agreement. c. The Parks Agreement shall be consistent with the requirements of the City's Growth Management Program. d. The Parks Agreement shall provide mechanisms for reimbursements, Park-In-Lieu fee credits and/or PFF credits. 3. No residential development will be allowed after 1992 unless actions have been taken to construct additional park facilities. :IV. F:CNANC:CNG The City's approved Capital Improvements Program contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District l: Park Project Cannon Lake Macario (credit) Pine Street School Senior Citizen Center Community Center 1988-89 $3,500,000 1997+ $770,500 $7,000,000 $4,305,000 $1,447,000 $1,500,000 It should be recognized that if the city continues to collect Park-:In-Lieu (PIL) fees for new construction at a rate of $786 for each single family detached dwelling and $524 per unit for each attached multiple family dwelling of five units or more, phased development in Zone 8 will provide an estimated $710,544 in PIL fees through build out in 1994. 86 The City's adopted CIP projects a PIL fund balance of $1,276,033 at the end of fiscal year 1989-90. A portion of this amount could be used for the construction of parks facilities or special use areas identified in the city's adopted Parks Inventory. A sufficient amount of acreage and funding will exist in Park District 1 prior to the build out of Zone a to mitigate the projected deficiency of parks facilities in 1990. Assuming an improvement cost of $115,000 per acre of developed park land, the improvement of 6.7 acres would require $770,500. Based upon the phasing projected in this LFMP, $220,080 would be paid into the PIL fund through 1990. Exhibit 40 on page 90 describes the individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction, existing budgeted CIP monies available and future funding options. 87 EXHIBIT 38 ZOIIE 8 -PHASING Of PARK FACILITIES YITIIOUT MITIGATICII • PARK DISTRICT 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZCIIES !ADOPTED LFMP OIIELLING UNIT AND POPULATICII ANALYSIS I DWELLING UNITS ADEQUACY ANALYSIS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·-------------------------------TOTAL YEARLY w w STATUS YEAR YEARLY ADOPTED ADOPTED TOTAL PARKS PARKS ADEQUACY/ 3 5 8 13 24 ADOPTED PROJECTED POPULATICII ADOPTED DEMAND SUPPLY (IIIAOEQUACY) (AS OF 1/1) PHASED DU'S DU'S INCREASE POPULAT I OIi (ACRES) (ACRES) (ACRES) NOTES: (1) (2) (3) (4) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·--------·----------------------EXISTING I (4) 1988 I 9840 232 0 0 115 I 10,188 10, 188 25,175 25,175 I 75.5 82.2 6.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------··------------------------------· PROPOSED 1988 250 3 253 10,441 625 25,800 77.4 82.2 4.8 1989 1n 3 175 10,616 432 26,232 71.7 82.2 3.5 1990 95 5 386 125 611 11,227 1,510 27,742 l!IJ.2 82.2 (1.0) 1991 81 2 325 125 533 11,760 1,317 29,059 87.2 112.2 (5.0) 1992 81 2 238 T1 398 12,158 9113 30,042 90.1 82.2 (7.9) 1993 81 2 250 ILD Cl.IT 333 12,491 823 J0,865 92.6 82.2 (10.4) 1994 81 2 25 108 12,599 267 31,132 93.4 82.2 (11.2) 1995 81 1 ILD OUT 82 12,681 203 31,335 94.0 82.2 (11.8) 1996 81 ILD Cl.IT 81 12,762 200 31,535 94.6 82.2 (12.4) (5) 1997 81 81 12,1143 200 31,715 95.2 123.0 27.8 1998 81 81 12,924 200 31,935 95.I 123.0 27.2 1999 81 11 13,005 200 32,135 96.4 123.0 26.6 2000 81 81 13,086 200 32,336 97.0 123.0 26.0 2001 81 81 13,167 200 32,536 97.6 123.0 25.4 2002 81 81 13,248 200 32,736 98.2 123.0 24.8 2003 81 81 13,329 200 32,936 98.8 123.0 24.2 2004 81 81 13,410 200 33,136 99.4 123.0 23.6 2005 81 81 13,491 200 33,336 100.0 123.0 23.0 2006 81 81 13,5n 200 33,536 100.6 123.0 22.4 2007 81 81 13,653 200 33,737 101.2 123.0 21.8 2008 81 81 13,734 200 33,9l7 101.8 123.0 21.2 2009 81 81 13,815 200 34,137 102.4 123.0 20.6 2010 IU a, 13,1196 200 34,337 103.0 123.0 20.0 2011 81 81 13,977 200 34,537 103.6 123.0 19.4 2012 81 81 14,058 200 34,737 104.2 123.0 1a.a BUILD OUT 2013 11 81 14,139 200 34,937 104.8 123.0 18.2 -----------····---------·--·------------··················--·------------------·--······------·-----------------·-----···················-···~---------------------·····-----TOTAL 12,220 252 1,225 442 14,139 14,139 34,937 ----------······-···-------------····----------------------·············--------·--·---------·············--·-------------------·----------·· ··········--------------------- NOTES: 1. Zone 1 LFNP, adopted Septlllber 1, 1987, C.C. Reao No. 9221. 2. Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, c.c. Reao No. 9084. 3. Zone 5 LFMP, adopted Auguat 4, 1987, c.c. Rno No. 9188. 4. Zone 24 phHfng 1checllle fl Included for pl .... 11111 purpo111 only. 5. cannon Lake, Macarlo Canyon, Maxton Brown Ext-fan end Pine StrHt School per the •87•'92 CIP. 88 EXHIBIT 39 ZONE 8 -PHASING Of PARK FACILITIES WITH MITIGATION -PARK DISTRICT 1 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONES !ADOPTED LFMP D\IELLING UNIT AND POPULATION ANALYSIS I DWELLING UNITS ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL YEARLY NW NW STATUS YEAR YEARLY ADOPTED ADOPTED TOTAL PARKS PARKS ADEQUACY/ 3 5 a 13 24 ADOPTED PROJECTED POPtJLATIOII ADOPTED DEMAND SUPPLY ( I IIADEQUACY) (AS Of 1/1) PHASED DU'S DU'S INCREASE POPULA Tl ON (ACRES) (ACRES) (ACRES) NOTES: (1) (2) (3) (4) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------EXISTING I (4) t9aa I 9840 232 0 0 115 I 10,188 10, 188 25,175 25, 175 I 75.5 82.2 6.7 --------------·--------------------------------------------------------------··----------------------------------------------····----------------------··-··-----------------PROPOSED 1988 250 3 253 10,441 625 25,800 77.4 82.2 4.8 1989 172 3 175 10,616 432 26,232 78.7 82.2 3.5 1990 95 5 386 125 61\ 11,227 1,510 27,742 83.2 82.2 (1.0) (5) 1991 81 2 325 125 533 11,760 1,317 29,D59 87.2 91.0 3.8 1992 81 2 238 77 398 12,158 983 30,042 90.1 91.0 D.9 1993 81 2 250 BLD OOT 333 12,491 823 30,865 92.6 91.0 (1.6) 1994 81 2 25 108 12,599 267 31,132 93.4 91.0 (2.4) 1995 81 1 BLO OOT 82 12,681 203 31,335 94.0 91.0 (3.0) 1996 81 BLD OUT 81 12,762 200 31,535 94.6 91.0 (3.6) (6) 1997 81 81 12,843 200 31,735 95.2 123.0 27.8 1998 81 81 12,924 200 31,935 95.a 123.0 27.2 1999 81 81 13,005 200 32,135 96.4 123.0 26.6 2000 81 &1 1:S,086 200 32,336 97.0 123.0 26.0 2001 81 81 13,167 2DO 32,536 97.6 123.0 25.4 2002 81 81 13,248 2DO 32,736 98.2 123.0 24.8 2003 81 81 13,329 200 32,936 98.8 123.0 24.2 2004 81 81 13,410 200 33,136 99.4 123.0 2:S.6 2005 81 81 1:S,491 2DO 33,336 100.0 123.0 23.0 2006 81 81 13,572 200 33,536 100.6 123.0 22.4 2007 81 81 13,65:S 2DO 33,737 101.2 123.0 21.a 2008 81 81 13,734 200 3:S,937 101.a 123.0 21.2 2009 81 81 13,815 200 34,137 102.4 123.0 20.6 201D 81 81 13,1196 200 34,337 103.0 123.0 20.0 2011 81 81 13,977 200 34,537 10:S.6 123.0 19.4 2012 81 81 14,058 200 34,737 104.2 123.0 ,a.a BUILD OOT 2013 81 81 14,139 200 34,937 104.8 12:S.O 18.2 ----------~-----------------------------·------------------------·····----------···--------··------------·-------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL 12,220 252 1,225 442 14,139 14,139 34,937 -----··········-----·-·····--·---·····-----------········----·-···---------·-·················------·-····-----····-·--·--···-··--·-······----ft--·······--------·····-----··· NOTES: 1; Zone 1 LFMP, adopted Sept_,.,.r 1, 1987, C.C. Reso No. 9221. 2. Zone 3 LFMP, adopted May 19, 1987, C.C. Reio No. 9084. 3. Zone 5 LFIIP, adopted August 4, 1987, c.c. Reso No. 9188. 4. Zone 24 phasing ■chedule Is Included for plamlng purposes only. 5. 2.1 acres of pert land eccelerated to 1991 by Zone 24 end 6.7 acres of part land accelerated to 1991 a■ proposed In the Zone a LFMI'. 6. Macerlo Canyon and Pine Street School per the •a7-•92 CIP, No fixed date In CJP. 89 ) ANOUIIT PARK FACILITIES· PARK DISTRICT 1 1. Land Aq.ilaltlon ·Pine Senior Citizen Center J.0 IC ·Pine Strnt School 7.0 ec 2. Dnlan and Construction ·Pine Senior Citizen Center J.O ec ·Pine Street School 7.0 ac ·C-.ilty Center ·Camon Lake 6.7 ec ·Nacerto 25 ec 3. laproveaient Costa a.a ae 4. Operetf01111 Coat (1) TOTAL PARKS COSTS: EXHIBIT 40 ZONE 8 • PARK FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 12/21/88 ESTIMATED COST $1,447,000 S3,SOO,OOO $3,500,000 SJ00,000 $805,000 $1,500,000 S770,SOO S7,025,000 11,012,000 •••••••saa:zaa S19,859,500' TINING 1997+ City· PFF 1997+ City • PIL (NW) 19811·'19 City • TII 19811 State Grant 1997+ City • PFF 1997+ City • PFF 1997+ City· PFF 1997+ City • PfF Concurrent w/ Developer with Deve I DflM'lt ltehllbura--.t FUNDING OPTIONS SECOIID THIRD NOTES Pff • Plbllc Fecll ltlea Fee PIL • Pert•ln·Lleu Fees TII • Tex lncreMnt londs .. -.. --..... -.. -----........ --.. --.. ---------................ --.... -------.. --.. --...... ---. --.. -.. -.. -....... -... ---..... -------......... --...... --..... ---------... --· --. ---....... --... -.. -. -........ ---..... -----.. --.. CIP Budget: 1988 '88·'89 1997+ 1997+ 1997+ 1997+ 1997+ Balance Forward S283,662 (Pine Sr. Center> Sl,500,000 (Pine Sr. Center) S7,000,000 CM■cerlo) S770,500 (Camon Lake> S805,000 (Pine Sr. Center) S3,500,000 (Pine St. School) S1 ,447,000 (Pine Sr. center> S25,000 (Hacarlo) S16,338 <Pine Sr. Center) Notes: (1) To be determined within the Park• Agreement. 90 ) .- DRAINAGE FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. INVENTORY Zone 8 lies entirely within Basin B of the Agua Hedionda Creek Watershed as shown in the Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad. It encompasses a portion of the north shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, the headlands of the Lagoon to the El Camino Real Bridge over Agua Hedionda Creek, and a portion of Macario canyon and its tributary area. There are drainage patterns in various directions within the zone, but storm runoff ultimately outlets in a westerly direction into the Lagoon. 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities The existing major drainage facilities9 that are within Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 41 on page 92 and are as follows: Existing Facilities Within Zone 8 Facility Designation Facility size Location 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 Storm Drain 42" RCP Park Drive Storm Drain 42" RCP Cannon Road Storm Drain 36" RCP cannon Road Storm Drain 42 II RCP Cannon Road Storm Drain 54 11 RCP cannon Road storm Drain 30" RCP Cannon Road Major storm drain facilities are defined by the City to be pipes with.a diameter of JO-inches or larger. RCP=Reinforced Concrete Pipe 91 92 -~ KAUFMAN ancl BROAD ......................... CA ...... Existing & Pr.oposed Drainage Facilities LEGEND •••• Storm Drain IExi.Ung) 0000 Stonn Drain IPropoeed> <I) Proposed Deslltatlon Basin <IJ=· l:xlttlng Deslltatlon Basin Direction of Drainage Existing Drainage Basin Boundery f!lannlng Area Boundary ~ Planning Area •,,,. Zone 12 fee Boundary C.:.. Direction of Drainage Proposed & Node Designation © Existing Major Storm Drain Faclltes @ fl'aposed Mater Storm Drain Facllltles EXHIBIT 411 r ■ _,,,..,.~-___ c-.. ,.. ...... ,,.., ..... . .- B. 10 2. An additional existing major facility is the lined open channel aligned to accept the proposed Cannon Road Bridge. The approximate Ql00 of the Agua Hedionda Creek is 10,000 CFS as taken from the County of San Diego Sanitation and Flood Control District Report, December 1976. · Proposed Build out Facilities Within Zone a . The major drainage facilities that are proposed for the build out of Management Zone 8 are shown in Exhibit 41 and are as follows: Facility Facilit~lO Designation ~ Location A Storm Drain 30" RCP Future Cannon Rd. B Storm Drain 30" RCP Future cannon Rd. C Storm Drain 3611 RCP Future Cannon Rd. D Storm Drain 54 11 RCP Macario Park E Storm Drain 72 11 RCP Macario Park F Grass Lined 7' Deep Macario Park Open Channel G Storm Drain 3011 RCP Future oceanaire Rd. H Storm Drain 54" RCP Park or. PHASING Required storm drain facilities will be installed concurrent with development so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained through build out of Zone 8. Exhibit 42 on pages 95, 96, and 97 describes the anticipated drainage improvements to be installed during each phase of development in Zone 8. Other facilities may be required if they are identified in the revi~ed Drainage Master Plan. RCP=Reinforced Concrete Pipe 93 1. Technical Assumptions As acknowledged in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, "Drainage is more accurately assessed as the specific development plans for individual projects are finalized." Therefore, since any increment of development within the Zone will have drainage facilities sized to handle runoff at build out, the performance standard will always be met by virtue of design standards and approval procedures administered by the City. These are: (a) Hydrology Determination of design runoff quantities shall be in accordance with the method outlined in the San Diego County Flood Control District Design and Procedure Manual, as currently revised. (b) Drainage Facility Design Drainage facilities shall be designed in accordance with the Standard Design criteria for the Design of Public Works Improvements in the City of Carlsbad. The information contained in this report was extracted from the Master Drainage Plan entitled, "Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, California," June, 1980, pr~pared by VTN Southwest. This Master Plan sets forth the comprehensive local drainage system necessary to ,meet the long-term needs of the City and should be used as a tool in planning for future improvements. The City's Master Drainage Plan is currently being revised. The revised Plan may address revisions to facility and fee requirements within Zone 8. Although major changes in facilities are not expected, drainage-area fees may be revised. As previously discussed, drainage is more accurately assessed as the specific development plans for individual projects are finalized. The ref ore, any proposed development within this zone will be required to construct the necessary drainage facilities so that the City's adopted performance standard will be maintained through build out. 94 -- .. - PHASE I II 1990 1991 The proposed drainage facilities which will serve each planning area within Zone 8 were analyzed by drainage sub-basins within the boundaries of this zone. These proposed drainage facilities are shown on Exhibit 41 and are as follows: Exhibit 42 DRAINAGE FACILITIES BY PHASE -ZONE 8 PLANNING AlmA A E G C H I K PROPOSED FACILITIES Area "A" will reroute an existing 42" drain into a new desiltation basin on the east end of Area "A" through a new 54 11 pipe. A private desiltation basin will also be constructed on the west end of Area "A". Area "E" will construct 18" through 42" pipes carrying the existing desiltation basin on the west end of Area "E". Area "G" will construct an 18" storm drain to carry runoff to the existing desiltation basin and 30" pipe in Cannon Rd. Area "C" will be graded to drain into an existing desiltation basin in Area "H". Area "H" will construct a 24" storm drain to carry runoff into an existing desilting basin in Area "H" . Area "I" will construct pipes up to 3611 carrying the water into an existing desiltation basin in Area "F". Area "K" will construct an 18" storm drain to carry runoff to the existing desiltation basin and 30" pipe in Area "G" . 95 Exhibit 42 (cont'd) PHASE III 1992 IV 1993 PLANNING AREA J L N 0 p Q R PROPOSED FACILITIES Area "J" will utilize the 30" storm drain placed previously by Area "I" in Phase II. Area "L" will construct an 18" storm drain which will.carry storm runoff to the 30" through 36" pipe constructed in Area "I" during Phase II. Area "N" will construct 18" storm drains which will tie into an existing storm drain system constructed during Phases I, II and III. Area 110 11 will construct 18" and 30" storm drains which will carry storm runoff to the 30" through 36" pipe constructed in Area "I" during Phase II. Area "P" will const:r:uct 18" storm drains which will tie into existing storm drains constructed during Phases I, II and III. Area "Q" will construct a desil tat ion basin and 24" pipe to carry runoff to its existing drainage course towards the easterly property line. Area "R" will construct 18" storm drains which will tie into an existing storm drain system constructed during Phases I, II and III. 96 Exhibit 42 (cont'd) PHASE YEAR V 1994 PLANNING AREA M Macario Park Kirgis PROPOSED FACILITIES Area "M" will construct 18" storm drains which will tie into an existing system constructed during Phase I, II and III. Macario Park will construct an open channel, draining into a proposed desiltation basin near Cannon Road. The Kirgis property will be served by an 18" pipe which will carry storm runoff to the open channel constructed through Macario Park. 97 Desilting basins shall be located and shall have volumes set forth in the City's Master Drainage Plan, or as shown on more detailed plans prepared for specific development in the zone. Proposed development areas will not create erosion or downstream siltation problems because: Rough graded areas will be required to provide temporary on-site desilting apparatus with volumes in accordance with the current Carlsbad standards. Intermediate development within existing drainage courses will provide temporary desilting basins on the downstream edge of development. Minor on-site desilting basins are programmed at drainage outlets around the Lagoon. Some of these basins have already been installed as shown in Exhibit 41 on page 92. The phasing of drainage facilities is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. Area boundaries shown on Exhibit 41 correlate with the natural drainage basins of the proposed facilities within the zone. There are five separate phases of development proposed in Zone 8, and thresholds for the major drainage facilities within each phase can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The phasing boundaries allow for the independent review and construction of drainage facilities required for development within each boundary. The City may, however, require improvements outside of the phase boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development. Drainage improvements within certain planning areas are contingent upon the construction of improvements in other planning areas during prior phases of development. In the event that a planning area is allowed to develop out of the phasing sequence proposed in this LFMP, then that planning area will be responsible for providing the necessary drainage facilities to serve its development in conformance with the adopted performance standard. 98 -- ·- C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Zone 8 currently meets the adopted performance standard for major storm drain facilities. Major drainage facilities will be constructed as development occurs so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. The current Master Drainage Plan provides that when impact is minor and major storm drain facilities are off-site, a drainage fee shall be paid by the developer in lieu of construqtion of the facilities. III. MITIGATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 A. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 8, the developer(s) shall be required to: 1. Pay any drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan; and 2. Execute an agreement· to pay any drainage area fees established in the forthcoming revised Master Drainage Plan. B. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 8, the developer(s) must provide the City with a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the necessary drainage facilities required to serve the proposed development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Specifically, these facilities shall include the following: Location/Facility Area: A: 1. 5411 Storm Drain 2. 3611 Storm Drain 3 • Desiltation Basin Area E;: 1. 30" Storm Drain Area I: 1. 3611 Storm Drain 2. 30" Storm Drain 99 Estimated Cost $ 48,000 $ 15,000 $ 80,000 $ 96,000 $ 50,000 $ 22,400 Area J: 1. 3011 Storm Drain $ 46,400 Area O: 1. 30" Storm Drain $ 6,400 Area Q: 1. Desiltation Basin $ 80,000 c. Prior to the development of Macario Canyon Park, funding of the following improvements shall be guaranteed: Location/Facility Macario Canyon Park: 1. 2. 3. IV. FINANCING Open Channel 7' deep 72" Storm Drain 54" Storm Drain Estimated Cost $468,000 $216,000 $ 63,000 The majority of drainage improvements in Zone 8 will be constructed in conjunction with development of Kelly Ranch. A major desilting basin north and west of El Camino Real at Cannon Road has already been constructed as well as three minor basins located along the Cannon Road alignment. Other improvements will be constructed in conjunction with development. The total estimated improvement costs for major facilities within Kelly Ranch is $1,191,200. The construction of these improvements will be assured by performance bonds posted by the developer. A detailed breakdown of costs is included in Appendix D. Within the Macario Canyon Park site, flood retention basins have been estimated to cost $747,000 to be constructed in the fourth year of the park development program. Funding may be accomplished through the Public Facilities Fee or other method adopted by the City Council for the development of Macario Canyon Park. Major facilities are those storm drains 30" or more in diameter, and desiltation basins. Exhibit 43 on page 101, describes the major individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction, and future funding options. 100 ) FACILITY DRAINAGE FACILITIES AGUA.NEDIOIIDA CREEK WATERSHED Area A (Kelly Ranch) 1. 54• Ston1 Drain 2. 36' Stona Drain 3. Oeslltatlon Basin Area E 1. 30• Stor11 Oral n Area I 1. 36• Stora Drain 2. 30• Stor11 Drain Area J 1. 3011 Stona Drain Area o 1. 30" Stort11 Drain Are■ Q 1. Deslltatlon Basin KACARIO CANYON 1 • Open Channel 2. 72" Stora Drain 3. 54 Stor11 Drain Sli>total 320 LF 150 Lf 2 1,200 LF 500 Lf 280 Lf 580 LF 80 LF 5,200 lF 1,200 LF 600 LF TOTAL DRAINAGE COSTS 101 EXHIBIT 43 ZONE 8 • DRAINAGE FINANCING MATRIX AS Of 12/21/U ESTIKATED COST «a,000 S15,000 sao.ooo S96,000 S50,000 S22,400 S46,400 S6,400 S80,000 S444,200 S468,000 S216,000 S63,000 S747,000 S1, 191,ZOO TINING Concul"rent 11/DewlopMnt • • • • • • • • • • FIRST Dev.loper • • • • • • • • City • • FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND TNIRO ). NOTES Lf • Lineal Feet CIRCULATION FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facility Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS This analysis determines whether or not the circulation system within Zone 8 conforms to the adopted performance standard. The analysis also addresses all circulation element roads and intersections outside of Zone 8 impacted by 20 percent or more of the traffic generated in Zone 8 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard. A. INVENTORY A-summary of all road segments and intersections within Zone 8 is as follows: Road Segments El Camino Real Cannon Road Park Drive Faraday Intersections NUMBER OF LANES Existing Build Out 4 2 6 4 2 2 El Camino Real and Cannon Road Cannon Road and Faraday Avenue Classification Prime Arterial Major Arterial Collector Collector The existing road improvements which provide access within and adjacent to Zone 8 are shown in Exhibit 44 on page 103 and are described below. KELLY DRIVE is a two lane Collector street providing partial access to the northern boundary of Zone 8 from El Camino Real. EL CAMINO REAL is a four lane ~rime Arterial street running approximately north-south, east and adjacent to Zone 8. Planned improvements, scheduled to occur as 102 I .......... -·------- GRoWTtl M!INAGEMalT PflOGRAM·-OTY Of CARI.SBAO 103 t<AtEMAH and BROAD ... , ---.... '-,.,..._, CA MOH Street Classifications LEGEND ••• •••• 0000 0000 ........ 6 Lane Prime Arterial (40,000 or More I • Lane Major Arterial 120,000-40,000 ADT I 4 Lane Secondary Arte'rial (20,000 ADT I 2 Lane Collector (5,000 ADT I Local 1500 Max. I NORTHWEST OOADRANT BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 44 ■ . abutting properties develop, include widening of the street to ultimately six lanes to conform with Prime Arterial standards. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD is a partially improved Prime Arterial street extending from the easterly city limits to Interstate 5, south of Zone 8. It provides the nearest freeway access to the project area. currently, the road is undergoing improvements to six lane Prime Arterial standards for portions of its length between Camino Vida Roble and El Camino Real. Palomar Airport Road is also currently being improved and widened to six lane Prime Arterial standards from Palomar Oaks Way to Paseo Del Norte. This construction is projected to be completed in August, 1989. CANNON ROAD at present dead-ends east of Paseo Del Norte. It provides access between I-5 and Paseo Del Norte. Planned improvements include extending Cannon Road through the project area. TAMARACK AVENUE is a two to four lane Secondary Arterial street, running approximately east-west, north of the project area and connecting with El Camino Real. HILLSIDE DRIVE is a two lane Collector street providing access to the northern p'ortion of Zone 8 from Tamarack Avenue. PARK DRIVE is a two lane Collector street running parallel to the northerly boundary of Zone 8 and connecting with Tamarack Avenue to the north and to the east with the southern e~d of Kelly Drive. Road segments and intersections outside of Zone 8, but impacted by 20 percent of Zone 8 traffic as shown on Exhibits 45-50 on pages 105 through 110, are summarized as follows: NUMBER OF LANES R/W Road Segments Existing Build Out Width Classification Cannon Rd. from Faraday Ave. to I-5 Intersections -\4 Cannon Rd. @ Paseo Del Norte Cannon Rd. @ I-5 (SB off ramp) .cannon Rd. @ I-5 (NB off ramp) 4 102' Major 104 ·-- ' :-----■,. --. I . I • I ·-- . \ . \ . \ . \ • \ . \ . \ . ' . ' . ' . GftOWTH MA.'IAGEMENT PROGRAM-QTY OF CARLSIIAO 105 --~ l<AlFMAN and BROAD nao, --.... -~-CA -H ......... , . '·-., ; AVE • • I ; . I i . . I \ i . ; • I • I . I . ___ , . . I . I ·, ; • ..J • ,· -- Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages -Phase I (1990) EXHIBIT 45 ■ . . \ . \ . \ • \ . \ . \ . \ . ' . I . ' . GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-CITY Of CAIII.SBAD 106 KAlFMAN and BROAD , .. , ......., ..... --. ......,., c:11a ..... --...... I ~----·'I .-. C I • I . I i . ......... ._., i . .__ ., ------, . --, ; ""e • • L._ ·-----. . I ; • I . ,. I . I \ i . . ~ I . I . I . I . :-----! I . I . ·, I . .J . ,· -- Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I + II (1991) EXHIBIT 46 ■ . •flOt••·: ...... -__ .,..,, ... -1•·•11,, ... \ . \ • \ I \ I \ . \ I \ I \ I ' I ' I GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-OTY OF CARLSBAD 107 --~ KAlFMAN and BROAD .............. -......... CA .. H ·--' :--:--•, •-I i. I • I I ---·---, i._ ., -----., • I --, • ; I I I I I I I :-----! I I I . -.J' ! .__, Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I + II + Ill (1992) EXHIBIT 47 ■ ·•I'll u~v ~• ..,...._ , __ .,,,11 ._,.,.,,n, .. , ,.._ .> \ \ GflOWlH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM--OTY OF CARLSBAD --KAlFMAN and BROAD ""' ---................ CA .... \ \ . \ . \ . \ . \ • \ . ' . ' . ' . ·-· ' :-·-=--·, .-. I . I ; __ 108 ) ·-----., . '·-., ; Ave • . L._ ...... ___ _ I i i i • ,. I . \ . I • . I . I . I . I . -. I . -· I . I . ·, I _ _, . ,· -- Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I + II + Ill + IV (1993) EXHIBIT 48 ■ ' -1•·-lo---•--.:-"tlM ... .. ,,,,,_ ,. ..... • > \ \ GROW1H MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-QTY OF CARLSBAD -~ ICAUFMAN and 8AOAO ..,._., .... IM,..__ u, - \ • \ . \ . \ . \ . \ . \ • I . l . I 109 . I ; __ ·--·---, ) • I ; i . I. I . \ i . . I . I . I . I --i . -· I . I . --i' ! .__, Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages - Phase I + II + Ill + IV + V (1994) EXHIBIT 49 ■ . ,_ ... _lo_l'O[ ............. c .. .,r:· .._ "•1•n• .. · . \ \ . \ \ \ lROWlH MNWJEMENT PROGRAM-CITY Of CAAl.S8AD ~~[M~~~~ffl ~©00~ ® --<AI.FMAH and 11¥,)M) _..,.. ........... C,11, .... . \ • \ . I • I • I . '---· 110 ) ·-· I :--:-•, --. I . I • I i. ---·---, . '·-., • I AVE • i ; • . I • '· I • ' i . . -. I . -· I . I ·, ; • ..J • ,· -- Zone 8 Trip Distribution Percentages -Bulldout (1995-2010) EXHIBIT 50 ■ -=-·--.> \ \ Cl'OW1H MANAGEMENT PROGMM-OTY OF CNILSIW) ~ and IIIQAD ............ ~ ......... CA N0n 111 I . i i. ---..... , i .... . , . . I -ive • • ' i . .., . ' ; . I • ' ; :--·--· I . I . • , I ·-' . ,· -- Locations Impacted By 20% Or More Of Traffic From Zone 8 Build Out/ Fully Constrained General Plan EXHIBIT 51 ■ '"°to~;• """',a, ""'""_.,..,"" _,. W• ,._. B. PHASING Development within Zone 8 will take place in three separate areas: Kelly Ranch in the northerly portion, Macario Canyon Park in the southerly portion and the Kirgis property in the easterly portion of the zone. Kelly Ranch will consist of a mix of 1, 214 single and multiple family residential dwellings with 8.7 acres of recreational commercial. The project is proposed to be developed in five yearly phases as shown in Exhibit 52 on page 113. Macario Canyon Park is assumed to be developed over a 15 year period. The park will eventually attract 3,500 potential park visitors each weekday. Assuming that each vehicle will carry two persons and that each vehicle makes two trips (one arrival, one departure), there will be approximately l, 750 vehicle trips daily to and from the park. No development plans have been proposed for the Kirgis property; however, for the purpose of determining vehicle trip generation, 11 single family dwellings have been assumed based upon the current zoning and land use designation on the property. Exhibit 52 on page 113 shows proposed land uses, vehicle trip generation, ·and phases of development assumed for Zone 8. Vehicle trip generation is based upon SANDAG generation rates (see Appendix E, Transportation Analysis Report). 112 EXHIBIT 52 PROPOSED LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION -ZONE 8 PLANNING LAND TRIP PHASE BY OWNER AREA USE INTENSITY* RATE** TRIPS YEAR KELLY RANCH A MF 140 du 8/du 1,120 I (1990) B OS 201.8 ac 0 0 N/A C MF 70 du 8/du 560 II ( 1991) E SF 176 du 10/du 1,760 I (1990) F COMM 9.0 ac· 8/ac 72 IV (1993) G MF 70 du 8/du 560 I (1990) H MF 90 du 8/du 720 II ( 1991) I SF 75 du 10/du 750 II ( 1991) J MF 80 du 8/du 640 III (1992) K MF 90 du 8/du 720 II ( 1991) L MF 33 du 8/du 264 III (1992) M MF 15 du 8/du 120 V (1994) N MF 35 du 8/du 280 III (1992) 0 MF 90 du 8/du 720 III (1992) p MF 80 du 8/du 640 IV (1993) Q MF 85 du 8/du 680 IV (1993) R MF 85 du 8/du 680 IV (1993) SUBTOTAL: 10,286 KIRGIS SF 11 du 10/du 110 V (1994) MACARIO PARK -DVLPD. 49 ac 35/ac 1,750 (1994 to (City of EARK 2002) Carlsbad) TOTAL: 12,146 LEGEND: MF = Medium/Medium-High Residential SF = Single Family Residential OS = Open Space COMM = Commercial Recreation SOURCE: * Based upon Pending Master Plan ** SANDAG 113 Exhibit 54 on page 115 shows the location of Zone 8 planning areas relative to the existing and proposed street system. In order to project potential impacts to the circulation system, trips generated from Zone 8 were distributed and assigned to the street network system to coincide with the conceptual phasing plan shown in Exhibit 53 below: PHASE I II III IV V EXHIBIT 53 CONCEPl'UAL DEVELOPMENT PHASING KELLY RANCH YEAR TRIPS 1990 3,440 1991 2,750 1992 1,904 1993 2,072 1994 120 . 10,286 KIRGIS TRIPS llQ 110 Subtotal: 1994 to 2002 N/A N/A TOTAL: MACARIO CANYON TRIPS lli 114 10,510 1.636 12,146 The assigned trips were then added to available existing traffic volumes factored upward to account for area-wide growth. (See Exhibits 46-51 and Appendix E, Figures 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14). The combined traffic volumes (i.e., Existing and Area Growth and Zone 8) were then used to determine the future short-term impact and mitigation. This included an analysis of Zone 8 impacted street segments and intersections for Zone 8 as shown on Exhibits 55 and 56 on pages 118 and 120. 114 • a: 0 ► ..I ..I PARK KELLY RANCH vi ~-·-·-y-·- i ~ • , ..... .......... .......... ·--·-·-·-·-·-·-·- a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-CITY OF CARLSBAD 115 KAUFMAN and BROAD .... 1 .......... 1111 ........ CA .... • I • IIV I I • (IV I I • ··········••■■■11■■■---■11111111111111111111,11~ : I i KIRG1s1 2 1 i : . : IV, \ ;. , ,. ~ 111111111111 • • • • • • ···• •i • Zone B Planning Areas and Phasing LEGEND 1111111 Property Une Boundary -•-Zone 8 Boundary Planning Area Boundary A Planning Area 1111) Phase PLANNING DWELLING AREA UNITS PHASE l<ally R■nch & uo I C 70 II B 171 I r IV G 70 I • to II I ,. II , 10 lll k to II L ,, lll " 15 V N 35 JU a ,o Ill • 10 IV Q IS IV R .. IV iffi"'" IQrgll 11 YUi TOTAL 1225 YEAR u,o 1991 u,o lHJ 1110 1191 · lttl un 1991 l9U 19H 1192 199:1 lHJ un lHJ l9H(21 (1) Actual pbe■lnq ••Cl'l•nc:•. unit■ alloc:at■d to parc■l■, and/or unit: type -y vary, pn,videcl that all aec■■■ary inti·a■t:rvc:tur■ requir■..,.t■ •r• Mt. C2) Ho plans tor d■v■lopaent or Kirqia propeny ar■ known at tbi■ ti... Pha■int ·••uaed for tb■ pllrpOH ot Ut.i■ LFNP, 01 PbHillCJ of iaprov■-nta viuin Kacario Canyon Park d■pand■ on City Ha■t■r Plan. T EXHIBIT 54 ■ -··-"--...,.._C_9tlltl ....... , .. , ... ,... The traffic circulation network and the projected impacts resulting from traffic generated from Zone 8 were analyzed by utilizing data from the following reports: Transportation Analysis for zone 8 prepared by Urban Systems Associates, Inc., dated August 31, 1988. The Barton-Aschman City Wide Traffic Study SANDAG Traffic Projections (1987) City Guidelines Manual The traffic analysis prepared by Urban System Associates, Inc., is a detailed study with the specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 8. This study analyzes the impact of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections affected by the traffic from this zone. The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard through build out of Zone 8. The Barton-Aschman Citywide Traffic Study and the SANDAG Traffic Projections were used as reference data in the analysis of zone a traffic. The Barton-Aschman Study is used to determine the existing traffic projections while SANDAG is used to analyze the build out traffic projections. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections. serving Zone 8 and to propose a mitigation plan if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance standard. The phasing of development and analysis of traffic impacts will be monitored on an annual basis. However, for the purpose of this study,the timing of the necessary improvements will be presented in the following increments: Improvements needed now Improvements needed in 1990 -Phase I Improvements needed in 1991 -Phase II Improvements needed in 1992 -Phase III Improvements needed in 1993 -Phase IV Improvements needed in 1994 -Phase V Improvements needed by -1995 Improvements needed by -2000 Improvements needed at Build out The Phasing Schedule presented above shall not limit needed traffic improvements to the years mentioned. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing.of the necessary improvements has changed, the required improvements shall 116 also be adjusted to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone a. In accordance with the adopted performance standard, the existing and proposed traffic facilities within and surrounding Zone 8 will be identified by an evaluated Level of Service. The performance standard determines that during peak hours a Level of Service A through Dis acceptable and a Level of Service E or worse is unacceptable. If it is determined a facility fails to meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared to guarantee the facility will operate at an acceptable Level of Service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more thoroughly later in this report. 1. Intersections Exhibit 55 on page 118 lists the impacted intersections studied and indicates the Level of service for each of the intersections in the increments previously discussed under Phasing. The intersections were evaluated using data and methods contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. 117 I LOCATION I EXISTING I 1990 I 1991 I EXHIBIT 55 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL Of SERVICE 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 I 2000 I BUILDOUTI 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I I AM PN I AM PN I AM PN I AM PN I AM PM I AM PN I AM PN I AM PN I AM PMI ···-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 El C1111lno Real / I I I Camon Rd. I (1) (1) a A C A C a D C D C I A A C C 8 C I I I I Camon Rd./ I I I Faraday Ave. I (1) (1) A A A A A A A A A A I A A A C A C I I I I Camon Rd./ Kelly Dr. (1) (1) A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Camon Rd./ Paseo Del Norte A A A A A A A A A 8 A 8 8 C C D C D I Cannon Rd./ I I 1-5 NI Off·Rlllll) A A A A A A A A I A A A A 8 A I C A 8 8 I I Camon Rd./ I I 1-5 SB Off·Rlllll) A A A A A A A .A I A A A A A A I 8 A A 8 I I NOTES: (1) Currently not built 11 8 ) As shown on Exhibit 55, all intersections either located within Zone 8 or impacted by Zone 8 traffic meet the performance standard and will continue to meet the standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. 2. Road Segments The City of Carlsbad utilizes a two-tier evaluation to analyze the level of service for road segments. The two methods utilized are as follows: a. Daily Capacity b. Peak Hour Volumes The first level of analysis determines an approximate off peak level of service using a ratio of existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to an assumed average roadway capacity. This volume to capacity ratio provides an indication of level of service (A-F) of the road segments. This method is a very generalized approach in determining levels of service and is used as an indicator of the off peak level of service. According to the adopted performance standard, no road segment or intersection impacted by traffic generated from Zone 8 shall exceed a Level of Service C during off peak hours or a Level of Service D during peak hours. The daily capacity method, as described above, analyzes a road segment for a daily average volume and is not an indicator of peak hour volumes. Therefore, in conjunction with the performance standard, the evaluated levels of service utilizing the daily capacity method is indicative of off peak operating levels and a Level of Service C will not be exceeded. The second level of review ~or road segments analyzes peak hour capacities. This is a more detailed analysis and is performed when it can be shown that the road segment is functioning at a volume greater than the assumed capacity. This method utilizes traffic counts during peak hours to determine the appropriate level of service. This detailed analysis is used to more accurately project the timing of failure of the road segment. This allows the needed improvements to be scheduled so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. No intersection falls below Level of Service D in any location. 119 --Exhibit 56 on page 120 lists the road segments are impacted by traffic generated from Zone 8. Level of Service results were derived using the capacity method. Exhibit 56 IMPACTED ROAD SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH MITIGATION -ZONE 8 which The daily LOCATION EXIST-BLD ING 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 2000 OUT CANNON RD. El Camino Real- Faraday Ave. Faraday Ave.- Paseo Del Norte Paseo Del Norte- I-5 A A A A A A A B A B Notes: Indicates not constructed C D A A A E* D A A A C C B C B * Peak hour analysis required. See below for discussion. The analysis as shown on Exhibit 56, indicates that Cannon Road between Faraday Avenue and Paseo Del Norte may operate at an unacceptable Level of Service projected for the year 1993. Therefore, as required under the Growth Management Program Traffic Guidelines, a peak hour analysis as previously described, was performed to more accurately project the Level of Service for Cannon Road. 120 The road segments requiring peak hour analysis and the Level of Service resulting from the analysis is summarized in Exhibit 57 below: Exhibit 57 ROAD SEGMENT PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE -ZONE 8 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 LOCATION AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM CANNON ROAD El Camino Real- Faraday Ave. A A A A B B C C D D (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) Faraday Ave.- Paseo Del Norte A A A A B B C C D D (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) (2 Lns) As shown on Exhibits 56 and 57 on pages 120 and 121, all circulation element roadways impacted by traffic generated from Zone a meet the adopted performance standard and will continue· to meet the standard through build out with the proposed mitigation measures. III. MITIGATION The proposed mitigation for Zone 8 circulation is based upon the phasing of development and anticipated impacts after Zone 8 build out. The mitigation measures presented below will ensure that the adopted performance standard will be maintained through build out of Zone 8. It should be understood that all cost estimates presented in this LFMP are preliminary in nature and will need further refinement as the actual scope of work, utility needs, and right-of-way requirements are determined. A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 1. An on-going monitoring program shall be established to evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, and demand on circulation facilities. The required timing of improvements is based upon the projected demand of development in the zone and the surrounding region. This timing may be modified without amendment to this plan, however, any deletions or additions to the improvements will require amending this local plan. 121 2. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, detailed intersection graphics depicting existing and build out conditions shall be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The required intersection graphics are for those intersections identified as being impacted by 20% or more of traffic generated from this zone. These impacted intersections are identified in Appendix E. 3. Prior to the approval of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a comprehensive financing program guaranteeing the construction of the following circulation improvements must be adopted: A. · Improvements Needed Now B. 1. None Improvements Needed by 1990 Construction of Cannon Road to half width Major Arterial standards from El Camino Real to Paseo Del Norte to include the following: a. Grade to Major Arterial standards b. Two full travel lanes c. Fully landscaped median d. Intersection improvements including installation of traffic signals at: (1) El Camino Real and cannon Road (2) Cannon Road and Paseo Del Norte Estimated Cost: $10,850,000 Completion Date: 1990 2. Installation of a traffic signal at the Cannon Road/I-5 off-ramp intersections. Estimated Cost: $120,000 Completion Date: 1990 122 3. c. o. E. Construction of dual left turn lanes at Cannon Road and I-5 Northbound and Southbound. Estimated Cost: $93,000 Completion Date: 1990 Improvements Needed By 1995 Construction of Cannon Road to full width Maj or Arterial between Paseo Del Norte and El Camino Real. Estimated Cost: $1,728,000 Completion Date: 1995 Improvements Needed By 2000 None Improvements Needed By Build Out None Zone 8 Issues 1. Faraday Avenue 2. Faraday Avenue is a Circulation Element roadway within Zone 8. The phasing and construction of this two lane Collector street is as yet undetermined. With the construction of Cannon Road through Kelly Ranch, Faraday Avenue is not required to provide secondary access to this portion of the zon~. Several options are available for the funding and construction of Faraday Avenue. These options include the construction of Faraday Avenue as part of the development of Macario Canyon Park. Another alternative is the construction of this road as part of the Carlsbad Research Center Phase v·development. As a condition of approval for CT 85-24, this development is required to provide two points of access, one of these being Faraday Avenue. Cannon Road This segment of cannon Road from El Camino Real to I-5 is proposed to be built in two phases: 1) 2 lanes in 1990; and 2) 2 additional lanes in 1995. Four major property owners within Zones 8, 14, 15 and 24 are 123 IV. FINANCING proposing an assessment district to fund the construction of Cannon Road to major arterial standards (4 lanes). The assessment district, as proposed, will construct this road segment to ultimate width by 1990. If the assessment district is not approved, the phased construction of cannon Road as proposed by this LFMP will allow development within Zone 8 to continue such that the performance standard will be maintained. Construction of roadways within Zone 8 will be funded through various mechanisms. The current CIP has identified $5.2 million in Public Facility Fee funds from Fiscal Years 1989-90 through 1997+ for the improvement of Cannon Road between I-5 and Faraday Avenue (Reach I). These improvements include the construction of two lanes of Cannon Road and a half width of bridge approximately 500 feet long. For that portion of cannon Road between Faraday Avenue and · El Camino Real (Reach II), the cost of improvements is estimated at $5.5 million. Within this reach, Cannon Road will be improved as this portion of Zone a develops. Within Macario Canyon Park, the construction of portions of Faraday Avenue may be funded through PFF funds, and/or conditions of approval imposed on. adjacent properties prior to development. Exhibit 58 on page 125 describes the individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction, existing budgeted CIP monies available and future funding options. 124 EXHIBIT 58 ZONE 8 • CIRCULATION FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 12/21/88 FACILITY AMOUNT CIRCULATION FACILITIES Camon Road fran half width Faraday Ave to 1·5 Camon Road from half width El Caniino Real to Faraday El C&11ino Real l Camon Road signal Camon Road l 1·5 (SB) dual left turn l- Camon Road & 1 ·5 (NB) dual left turn lane Camon Road & 1·5 signet Camon Road & Paseo del Norte signet Camon Road frOII full width 1 ·5 to El Camino Real TOTAL CIRCULATION COSTS 125 ESTIMATED COST. S5,200,O00 S5,5OO,OOO 185,000 S51,OOO 142,000 S12O,00O S65,OOO S1,"f63,OOO ···••=••····· S12,826,OOO TIMING 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1991 1995 FIRST City · PFF Developer City· PFF Assessment District Assessment District City • PFF City· PFF Developer FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND Asses1111ent District Assesnient District Developer Developer Developer Developer Developer Alle&Sllent District THIRD NOTES PFF • Public Facility Fees -FIRE FACILITIES - I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1500 dwelling units outside of a five minute response time. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. INVENTORY 1. 2. Inventory of Existing Demand: A total of 259 existing dwelling units in Zones 7, 8, 15 and 24 are presently outside a five minute response time from Fire Station #3. The existing developments outside the five minute response time are as follows: Management Zone 7 8 15 24 · General Plan Land Use RLM RM RL RLM RH/C/0 OS RLM The fire demand is as follows: Existing Units Outside Five Minute Response Performance Standard Unit Limit Dwelling Units Allowed Above Performance Standard Dwelling Units 126 1 1 12 1 3 ll2. 259 259 -1,500 1,241 Inventory of Existing Fire Facilities: At the present time, Fire Station #3 is the only station which serves Zone 8. This station is located at 3701 Catalina Drive as shown on Exhibit 59 on page 127. This exhibit also shows the five minute fire response time within this area. A 30 mph average driving rate is used to determine the five minute response time. The five minute response time begins 126 1 D.U. outside of °Flve Minute Response Time· In Zone a. --~:::.._----=:;:-7""------!t. . \ \ . \ . \ GROWTH MANAGEMENT l'ROGRAM-aJY Of CARL5IIAD KALFIIAN and BROAD .................... CA - . \ \22 . \ . \ . .~!NF!:A' 127 125 D.U.'s outside of°Flve Minute Response Time· In Zone 7. ---=--~-.. . -. 18 D. U.'s outside of °Flve Minute ~Response Time" In Zone t5. I •-•-•~•, 115 D.U.'s outside of "Five Minute i==-~-------T---Response Time· In Zone 24. i 18 i . I • 11 . I i ; . I --i . -· I . I . • , I • ..J • ,· -- Existing Fire Response Time LEGEND * Existing Fire station f'7":::I Boundary of Five Minute Response t:L,dTime for F.S.#3. EXHIBIT 59 ■ .............. --c----1 ........... 3. when the fire truck leaves the fire station. This is equivalent to a 2.5 mile driving distance from the fire station. Inventory of Future Approved Facilities: Fire Station No. 5 is currently scheduled in the City's five year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Fire Station No. 5 was proposed by the fire department for fiscal year 1987-1988, however, occupancy will not occur until June or July of 1989. B. PHASING Fire station #3 will continue to provide fire support to zone 8 until occupancy of Fire Station #5 in 1989. From 1989 to 1991, both Fire Stations will be within a five- minute response time of Zone 8. In 1991, Fire Station #3 will be relocated from Catalina Drive to Elm and Tamarack Ave. From 1991 until build out, fire support for Zone 8 will be provided by Fire Stations #3 and #5. Exhibit 60 on page 129 shows the five minute response time from Fire stations #3 and #5 at build out. As shown on this exhibit, 663 dwelling units in Zone 8 and 1,075 dwelling units in Zone 18 will be outside the five minute response time of any fire station in the City of Carlsbad at build out. Since fire support for. Zone 18 is provided by Fire Stations #5 and #6 (Rancho Santa Fe Road), responsibility for the dwelling units outside of the five minute response time are distributed between the ·two stations. The total number of dwelling units outside the five minute response time of Fire Station #5 at build out is as follows: Zone 8 663 dwelling units Zone 18 537 dwelling units Total 1,200 dwelling units The summary of fire demand for Fire Station is as follows: Projected Units outside Five Minute Response Performance Standard Unit Limit Dwelling Units Allowed Above Performance Standard 128 #5 at build out 1,200 -1,500 300 \ . \ . \ . \ . GROWlll MANAGEMENT PROGAAM-OTY OF CARLSBAD -~ KAlEMAN and BROAD .. , ._. ....... -....-. c,,. ...,. \ \22 . \ . \ • 129 I F.S.#Pl&sl'tiltt+f+U,l.p...,._ 11 Proposed Fire Response Time LEGEND i Exiting Fire Station ),..{ Proposed Fire Station 177lArea within the "Five Minute Respoose I..LLl Time· for Proposed F.S.#3. (Il]1] Area within the "Five Minute Response Time· tor Proposed F.S.#5. __ . .:Area within the "Five Minute Response _... Time" for F.S.#6 (Rancho Santa Fe Adi 1075 D.U.'s outside of "Five Minute Response Time" In Zone·1a . EXHIBIT 60 I :--·--· ■ I . I . • , I _ _, . ,· -- - C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Zone 8 currently meets the adopted performance standard and will continue to meet the performance standard until build out of zone 8. III. MITIGATION A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 No special conditions are necessary at this time. IV. FINANCING A specific financing plan for fire facilities is not required for Zone 8 as land for Fire Station #5 has been acquired and $1,680,000 has been appropriated in the CIP for 1987-1988. Exhibit 61 on page 131 describes the individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction and future funding options. 130 ) EKHIIIT 61 ZONE 8 -FIRE FIIIAIICIIIG MATRIX AS OF 12/21/88 ···················---------··-···--------··---------------------------------------···-···-----------·-··-----------------------------------------···---------- I FACILITY MIIIUIIT ESTIMATED COST TINIIIG fFIRST FUIIDIIIG OPTIONS SECOND HIRD NOTES l•••-•••-•••••-•••••••-•--••••••-••••-•-•-•••••••••-••-••••••-••••••••••••••••-••s•■•-••-••••■-sss-••~••-•••-••-•■mm-■■■■-1 I FIRE FACILITIES I 1--------·-----------··-·---------··---------------------------------------------------------------·----------·-·-----------------------------------------------1 I I I I I I I I I I 1. Fire Station 110. 5 I 10,000 SF I 11,680,000 I 1988 I City • PFF I · I I PFF " l'\j)llc Facil ltyf I ( Including IIA)llratus) I I I I I I I Fees I I I I I I I I I I I 2. Fire Station #3 I 3,500 SF I 1451,000 I 1992-97 I City -PFF I I I SF• Square Feet I I Relocet Ion I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..................... , I I I I I I TOTAL FIRE COSTS S2, 131,000 I I f f f f 1--··-·-------------------------------·-----·----------------------------·---------------·--·--------------------------------------·----------------------------1 f CIP Budget: '87·'88 11,680,000 (Station 5) I I 1. I I 131 I. OPEN SPACE PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS According to the Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan, Zone 8 is identified as already in compliance with the adopted performance standard. Therefore, no further analysis is required pertaining to open space. 132 SCHOOL FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. INVENTORY 1. 2. Service Demand The chart below indicates potential student generation for Zone 8. These projections are based on an assumption of dwelling unit type within the zone which may vary as development plans are prepared and phasing commences. The table represents the best estimate of residential project type at this time. EXHIBIT 62 student Generation -Zone 8 Unit Dwelling Total New status Year ~ Units Students Existing 88 SF 1 0 Projected 89 SF 0 0 MF 0 0 90 SF 176 35 MF 210 57 91 SF 75 15 MF 250 68 92 SF 0 0 MF 238 64 93 SF 0 0 MF 250 67 94 SF 11 2 MF 15 4 Total 1,225 312 Inventory of Existing School Facilities As shown in Exhibit 63 on page 135, Zone 8 is located entirely within the boundaries of the Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are no schools 133 located within the zone. The northwest quadrant of the City contains most of the existing schools within the District. At this time there are five (5) elementary schools, one (1) junior high, one (1) continuation high and one (1) high school in the quadrant. Exhibit 64 on page 136 lists existing and future schools serving Zone 8 and Exhibit 65 on page 137 shows their locations. These school facilities are all located in the older parts of Carlsbad well to the north of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and the associated Agua Hedionda Creek. The Agua Hedionda water course creates a distinct topographic separation between the established urban area of the quadrant and the Zone 8 territory. CUSD is location quadrants study. in the process of reevaluating a school study prepared in 1982 and is using the of the City as a geographic basis for the B. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Currently, only one (1) residential unit exists in Zone 8, therefore, school facilities are adequate to serve the existing demand. However, Zone 8 will generate 312 students through build out of the zone. New schools and/or classrooms will have to be provided by the School District to accommodate this future demand. The timing and locations of future school facilities will be identified through revision of the school location plan. Th.e Carlsbad General Plan identifies general locations for future school sites in each school category. The locations are a result of a joint study conducted by the City and CUSD in 1982. Recent preliminary analysis to update this study shows a potential need for an additional elementary school facility in .the northwest quadrant. The 1982 study made assumptions about density in the northwest quadrant based on severe limitation of density potential by the California Coastal Commission. In some cases this was as low as one dwelling unit per ten acres for large "agricultural" areas. Since that time the restrictions imposed by the CCC have been revised to allow densities closer to the Carlsbad General Plan. This is evidenced by the densities allowed through the Kelly Ranch Master Plan approval. 134 ,.._ .> \ \ GflOW1H w•w•EMENT PROOMM-arv OF CARLSBAo --KAUFMAN Ind BA0AD -·---~-~CA ..... ) ·-· I :-•-=--·, .-. I • I • • I • '·----..... , I '·-., I ~, .,_..._..._ . ... ;::::. ~:;r, ""' , ... .., •11•-•·• ) School District Boundaries LEGEND D c.i.bad Unified School District ~ Encinitas Elementary District & San ~ Dleguho High School District . ~ San Marcos Unified School District T EXHIBIT 63 ■ ............. ..,_,..ca•• .....,.. ..... EXHIBIT 64: E~ISTING AND FUTURE SCHOOLS SERVING ZONE 8 -- I PROJECTED I SCHOOL I EXISTING EXISTING FUTURE FUTURE I PROJECTED! SCHOOL TYPE I STUDENT I STUDENT I STUDENT STUDENT I YEAR OF I I DISTRICT I (2) I SCHOOL NAME I CAPACITY I ENROLLMENT I CAPACITY I ENROLLMENT I OPERATION! NOTES I 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I cuso I I I I I I I I c n I I I E I Kelly I 517 I 495 I I I I I I I JR I Valley I 899 I 791 I I 1,056 I I I I I H I Carlsbad I 1,678 I 1,647 I I 2,500 I I I I I E I Potential Future I 600 I I 600 I 600 I I (3) I I I I Zone ·19 Elementary I I I I I I I NOTES: 1. Carlsbad Unified School District 2. E -Elementary; JR -Junior High; HS -High School 3. A tentative agreement on the Alga school site has been reached between the CUSD 136 ". . \ \ \ . • \ • \ . GAOWlH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-aTY OF CAALSBAD _,. KAlFMAN and lfl0AD -•--.. ~-----CA - • . , HWy 78 ·--·--------- 137 KEU.Y ELEM.* o, DISTRICT ~-. -- N~ ~ Schools LEGEND EXISTING * Elementary * Junior tlgh ♦ tlgh School EXHIBIT 65 ■ Given the very restrictive locational factors in school siting and the predominant urbanized nature of the northwest quadrant, there are limited viable school sites. Zone 8, because of the residential development anticipated, and limited possible sites elsewhere in the quadrant, affords a potential opportunity for an additional elementary facility. At this stage, the District wishes to preliminarily identify Zone 8 as a pos~ible area for elementary school facilities. :II. MITIGATION A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 8 Prior to the recordation of any residential final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, in Zone 8~ an agreement shall be entered into between Carlsbad Unified School District and the affected property owner(s) that shall provide for the following: 1. The deeding of an acceptable school site to the Carlsbad Unified School District if it is determined by the District a school within Zone 8 is warranted. 2. A financing plan approved by the City and Carlsbad Unified School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 8 pursuant to condition #1. If any reimbursements and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing plan shall provide a mechanism to do so. 138 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk-line appropriate development. capacity to meet demand as determined by the sewer district must be provided concurrent with II. FACILITY PIANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS Zone 8 is located entirely within the City of Carlsbad Sewer Service District. The information contained within this section was obtained from a sewer master plan entitled "Master Plan of Sewerage," City of Carlsbad, December 1987, prepared by Wilson Engineering. This study provides a comprehensive review and evaluation of the conveyance, treatment and disposal requirements for the projected build out of Zone 8. A. INVENTORY The majority of Zone 8 lies south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. This southerly area drains naturally into the Lagoon, but it is undeveloped and contains no existing sewer collection system. The remainder of the Zone north of the Lagoon currently contains the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor (Park-Kelly Trunk Line) which increases in size from 21 inches at the east to 24 inches at the west. Sewage from existing development north and east of the zone flows into this line at several points. It outlets into an existing pump station on the north shore of the lagoon on the east side of Interstate 5. The Fox's Landing · pump station lifts the sewage through a 12-inch force main to a point west of I-5 where it flows westerly by gravity in an 18-inch trunk line to the existing Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor, which then flows southerly along the AT&SF RR to the Encina ~ater Pollution Control Facility (WPCF). Existing shown on follows: facilities within and Exhibit 66 on page downstream of Zone 8 are 140 and are tabulated as 1. Existing Facilities Within Zone 8 FACILITY DESIGNATION 1 EXISTING FACILITY 21" to 24" NAHl 139 PEAK FLOW CUMULATIVE 11. 96 mgd ULTIMATE CAPACITY 4.62 mgd ,. :, (' \ • \ \ \ • &----,----• \ 8--- ENCINA WPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-CITY OF CARLSBAD -~ ~ and BROAD .... , .... ..,. ...... ,..__a. ..... ' HWy 78 ·------------- 140 th Agua He captor 1 ,~ ... :: . '': .. .,~., j/ outh Agua Hediond terceptor .. t::::: fJuzmsuillv/ Sewer( Regional) LEGEND ■ ■ ■ EXISTING FORCE MAIN --FUTURE FORCE MAIN --EXISTING TRUNK 1111111 FUTURE TRUNK 0 EXISTING PUMP STATION 0 FUTURE PUMP STATION /j,_ SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 1 FACILITY DESIGNATION NORTHWEST QUADRANT BOUNDARY NOTE FACILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE SEWER MASTER PLAN ( ) POTENTIAL SIZE TO CARRY ADDITIONAL FLOWS PROPOSED BY CITY OF VISTA. SOURCE: CITY OF CARLSBAD SEWER MASTER PLAN -JUNE '84 EXHIBIT 66 2. Existing Facilities Downstream of Zone a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 The existing major sewer facilities that are located outside, but which serve Zone 8 by transporting the sewage to the Encina WPCF, are shown on Exhibit 66 on page 140 and are listed below. FACILITY DESIGNATION EXISTING FACILITY 24" NAH Inter- ceptor (NAHl through NAH5) Foxes Landing Lift Station 12" Force Main (NAH6) 18" Gravity Trunk ( NAH7) 42" Vista- Carlsbad Interceptor (VCII) Agua Hedionda Lift station Force Main (VC12) 42" Vista- Carlsbad Interceptor (VC13, VC14, vc 15) CUMULATIVE PEAK FLOW 1.96 mgd 2.38 mgd 2.38 mgd 2.38 mgd 17.08 mgd 17.08 mgd 17.08 mgd 17.70 mgd ULTIMATE CAPACITY 5.66 mgd 3.3 mgd 6.79 mgd 20.5 mgd 24.5 mgd 34.5 mgd 20.5 mgd The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor which is entirely owned by the City of Carlsbad has been found to have adequate build out capacity by the City's Sewer Master Plan. The City has recently added a third large pump along with the two existing smaller pumps bringing the capacity of the Fox's Landing Pump Station to 2,300 GPM. In the future as flows increase at the pump station, the City will upgrade the existing pumps and add a parallel force main across I-5 to carry the build out flow. No portion of the existing gravity trunk lines will need upsizing. 141 3. 4. As described above, flow from the NAHl is intercepted by the Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor. The capacity of the Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor is shared by the City of Carlsbad and by the City of Vista. Carlsbad's capacity along these reaches varies between 37.3 percent and 51.7 percent. According to recent monitoring, its capacity has not been exceeded. However, the City's Sewer Master Plan (Dec. 1987) has identified the entire facility downstream of the NAHl point of connection as having inadequate capacity flow at ultimate build out of all the tributary basins. The master plan recommends the following improvements: Add two pumps to Agua Hedionda lift station and force main improvements. Add 10,360' of parallel 54" interceptor line. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is regional and therefore the construction of the upgrades will be a joint effort between the Carlsbad and Vista. Service Demand in nature necessary cities of 1,225 dwelling units are projected within the residential portion of Zone 8. Exhibit 67 on page 143 presents a summary of sewer service demand by development phase in Zone 8. Demand for sewer service is assumed to be 220 gallons per day per dwelling unit. Non-residential development is assumed to generate an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) for each 1,800 sq. ft. of building area. The peaking factor for trunk line capacity listed in the City standard Design criteria is a constant 2. 5, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. This value was utilized in the City's Sewer Master Plan. Proposed Build out Facilities Within Zone 8 The proposed sewer facilities within Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 68 on page 144. They consist of local mains originating within the zone and trunk mains serving the zone and upstream tributaries. Downstream pump stations, force mains, and trunk mains are shown in Exhibit 66. In order to provide sewer service "to the planning areas within Zone 8, south of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, it will be necessary to construct the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor. The South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will 142 PHASE I 1990 II 1991 III 1992 IV 1993 V 1994 Macario* 1997 TOTAL DEMAND Exhibit 67 RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE DEMAND BY PHASE -ZONE 8 PLANNING DWELLING AREA SO FT UNITS (A) 140 (E) l 76 (C) 70 386 (C) 70 (H) 90 (I) 75 (K) 90 (J) (L) (N) (0) (F) (P) (Q) (R) (M) Kirgis 79,715 319,725 325 80 33 35 90 238 80 85 85 250 15 ll 26 .031 .039 .015 .085 .015 .020 .017 .019 .071 .017 .007 .008 .020 .044 .096 .017 .019 .019 .055 .003 .002 .006 0.490 * The MGD demand generated by Macario Park is shown as one total although build out is projected over a 15-year period. 143 ------ 5B KAUFMAN and BAOAD _,_ ............. CA ...,. Sewer ( Local) LEGEND •• Sewer Unes (Existing) • • Sewer Unes (Proposed> 0 Future Pump Station -••-ZONE 8 BOUNDARY Direction of Drainage {Existing) 2 4 C Sewer Drainage Zone Designation ( ) f'!annlng Ar• Boundary Planning Area Node Designation of Proposed Sewage Flov I See Table 251 Oversize To Carry Vista Sewerage EXHIBIT 68 5. ultimately serve all or portions of local facilities management zones 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 24. This interceptor will have the ability to serve not only a portion of the Carlsbad Sewer Service District but also portions of the cities of Vista and Oceanside. Currently, there does not exist an adopted flow transfer agreement between these agencies to provide for trunk line capacity. The South Agua Hedionda Interceptor (SAHI) to be installed along the Cannon Road alignment shall be sized to provide build out capacity for one of the following two cases presently under study by City staff and consultants: a) Ownership by the City of Carlsbad sized according to the City's Sewer Master Plan. b) Joint ownership with the City of Vista, whose capacity requirements would be added to case (a) above to determine the required line sizes. Whichever case is chosen, the trunk line through Zone 8 and the pump station, force main and trunk line extension west of Zone 8 to the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor will have to be constructed to accommodate development south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon within Zone 8. Proposed Build Out Facilities Outside of Zone 8 South Agua Hedionda Lift Station The South Agua Hedionda Interceptor extends westerly of the Zone 8 boundary as discussed above. Improvements to the proposed SAHI sewerage drainage basin, as described in the Carlsbad Master Plan of Sewerage, Wilson Engineering, Dec. 1987, are summarized on the following page: 145 Facility Stage l Lift Station Stage 1 Force Main Reach 1 Gravity Main Reach 2 Gravity Main Reach. 4 Gravity Main Stage 2 Lift Station Stage 2 Force Main SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA INTERCEPTOR LIFT STATION AND IMPROVEMENTS Year Year Projected Based Upon size Length by Master Zone 8 Estimated <in.> <feet) Plan Demand cost 1995 1990 $5i4,000 24 2,400 1995 1990 336,000 21 2,300 1995 1990 313,200 21 2,200 1995 1990 297,000 21 3,500 1995 1990 472,500 2000 2000 550,000 21 2,400 2000 2000 300,000 Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor prior to ultimate development cost of upsizing and future needed are shown below. will need to be upsized within the City. The improvements and year VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM COSTS I THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ll 1987-89 1990-94 1995-99 Beyond 2000 Total Interceptors Lift. Stations 1,270 945 0 38 985 0 1,350 442 3,605 1,425 11 Master Plan of Sewerage, Wilson Engineering~ Dec. 1987. 146 - - - 6. Reclaimed Water Currently, there exists large areas within Zone 8 which may be irrigated with reclaimed water. These areas include Macario canyon Park, common landscape areas, open space and recreational areas. Reclaimed water may be provided by the Calavera Hills Treatment/Reclamation Facility. The City is currently preparing a reclaimed water master plan. The intent of this master plan is to identify areas which can use reclaimed water and also to adopt design criteria for the installation of reclaimed water facilities. All development in Zone 8 shall implement recommendations for reclaimed water facilities when the master plan is adopted by the Carlsbad City Council. B. PHASING The phasing of sewer facilities within Zone 8 is based upon assuring that the needed facilities are in place prior to or concurrent with development. Sewer improvements within certain planning areas are contingent upon the construction of improvements in other planning areas during prior phases of development. In the event that a planning area is allowed to develop out of the phasing sequence proposed in this LFMP, then that planning area will be responsible for providing the necessary facilities to serve its development in conformance with the performance standard. PHASE I 1990 PLANNING AREA IMPROVEMENTS A Area "A" will construct an 8" main that will tie into the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. E Phase I will construct the 24" SAHI in and along Cannon Road. Area "E" will construct an 8" main that will tie into the 24" SAHI. G Area "G" will construct an 8" main that will tie into the 24" Phase I SAHI. 147 II 1991 C Area "C" will construct an 8 II main that will tie into the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. H Area 11H11 will be served by the SAHI constructed by Phase I. I Area III11 will construct an 8 II main that will tie into the 24 11 SAHI. K Area IIK" will construct an 8 II main that will tie into the 24 11 Phase I SAHI. III 1992 J Area IIJII will construct an 8 II main which will tie into the main constructed in Area III11 in Phase II. L Area IIL11 will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phase I and II. N Area "N11 will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases I and II. 0 Area 11011 will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases I and II. IV 1993 p Area "P" will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases II and III. Q Area "Q" will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases I and II. R Area "R" will construct an 8 II main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases I and II. -. 148 V 1994 MACARIO PARK KIRGIS PROPERTY M Area "M" will construct an 8" main which will tie into facilities constructed previously in Phases II and III. Macario Park will construct a 12 11 main along Faraday Avenue. The Kirgis property will construct an 8" main that ties into the 12 11 main in Faraday Avenue. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Development north of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, within Management Zone 8 has been determined to be in conformance with the adopted performance standard for sewer facilities. With the necessary assurances provided as mitigation measures development south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon in Management Zone 8 will conform with the adopted performance standard as well . . .--III. MITIGATION 1. No special conditions are required for Planning Areas 11A11 and "C" in the Kelly Ranch portion of Zone 8. 2. Special Conditions (except for Planning Areas 11A11 and "C") are as follows: a. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor from El Camino Real to the Vista-Carlsbad Interceptor must be approved by the City. b. Prior to issuance of any building permits for new development in Zone 8, the City Engineer shall make a finding that the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor will be in place and operational to serve new residential development within Zone 8. c. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permits or building permits, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing program guaranteeing the construction of the necessary sewer collection system to serve the proposed development. area must be approved by the City. 149 IV. FINANCING The primary facility to be constructed in Zone 8 is the trunk sewer in cannon Road (SAHI). A proposal to establish an Assessment District (#85-1) for the installation of Cannon Road and the trunk line has been submitted to the City and is currently in review. As part of this project the engineering and phasing of the sewer facilities will be determined in conjunction with the construction of cannon Road. outside of Zone 8, the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor will require additional upgrades to accommodate development. Portions of these improvements will be funded through Sewer Connection Fees. Exhibit 69 on page 151 describes the major individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction and funding options. 150 FACILITY I SEWER FACILITIES SAHi SEWERAGE BASIN 1. Stage 1 Lift Station 2. Stage Force Main 3. Reach 4. Reach 2 5. Reach 4 6. Stage 2 Lift Station 7. Stage 2 Force Main 2,400 Lf 2,300 Lf 2,200 Lf 3,500 Lf 2,400 Lf TOTAL SEWER COSTS 151 ElCHIBIT 69 ZONE 8 • SEWER FINANCING MATRllC AS OF 12/21/88 ESTIMATED COST S514,DOO S336,DOO S313,ii!OO $297,000 S4n,soo S550,DDO $300,000 ••••=••••••s•I S2,782,700 I TINING I FIRST 1990 A11esuient District 1990 Assess11ent District 1990 Assessment District 1990 Assessment District 1990 Assessment District 2DDD Assessment District 2000 Assessment District FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES Developer LF • Lineal Feet Developer Developer Developer Developer Developer Developer - I. WATER FACILITIES PERFORMANCE STANDARD Line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided concurrent with development. A minimum ten (10) day average storage capacity must be provided prior to development. II. FACILITY. PLANNING AND. ADEQUACY·. ANALYSIS· Zone 8 is located within the boundaries of the Costa Real Municipal Water District (CRMWD) service area, as shown on Exhibit 7 o on page 153. The zone is a part of the original district boundaries as formed in 1954 and water service commenced in 1957 with the construction of the first facilities. The Public Facilities and Improvements Plan addresses both water di_stribution and storage capacity which are discussed below. A. INVENTORY 1. Existing Facilities The existing CRMWD facilities located within Zone 8 are shown on Exhibit 71 on page 154 and are as follows: a. 12" line along the north boundary in Park/Kelly Drive, b. 10" line extending along the future Cannon Road alignment in the center of Zone 8, and c. 16" line extending along the southwest boundary of Zone 8. Exhibit 72 on page 155 shows the existing regional facilities serving Zone 8. 2. Design Criteria and Technical Assumptions Exhibit 72 also displays portions of the "Master Plan for Public Water System" as adopted by the Board of Directors of the CRMWD on February 5, 1985 (Exhibit "C" of Resolution No. 493 of•the District). All the details of the major transmission mains and storage facilities that will serve Zone 8 and the surrounding area are set forth in Exhibits 71 and 72 on pages 154 and 155. 152 \ \ . \ • \ \ \ \2 . \ • \ . I . ~ 9 ' • '·-· GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-QTY OF CARLSBAD --KAI.FMAN and BROAD ..., --. ....... ,....... ,... .... 153 Water Districts EXHIBIT 70 ... ., .... _ ... ...... c. .. 111111 .....""' ....... GhOWlH MNWlEMEtfT PROGRAM-QTY OF CAAlSBID 154 KAU=MAN and BAOH> ............ ~ ......... c,, .... Water ( Local) LEGEND •• ■■ Water Lines (Eldstlngl DO OD Water I.Ines I Proposed) • Water Tank IExlltlngl 0 Water Tank (Propoeedl ----ZONE 8 80UNDARY ...... -\ ,,• Planning Ar• Boundary (A) Planning Area ◄ Pr•aura Reducing station ) IOl,IRG&.IIAIGN QPOIIT ,OIi f'Uauc WAHR aYSTIQl- KIU.Y RANCH JANUUY, ··1i1i-DIIAP't EXHIBIT 71 ■ ............ ... -c-.111111 ---'7 ( / ( \ . \ \ \ \ • \ . GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-clTY OF CARLSBAD KAlFMAN and BROAD 1'Ml1--•--~#1111'"-CA NOH ,------------. ., i. ... 1 \ 155 • . . . t>. .. . 919• •• : •• • : 00 • 0 0 ::..~~~~1i •u ~ 1,· o f •••• 0 •• ·. ·.·.•_·· ••••• \ ooo ~ ooo,11-0 t Ol'l,oMAR . --· . . . .. . ~ • 0 ·•. 0 •• 0 •• 0 0 0 Water (Regional ) LEGEND •••• Existing Water System o o o Proposed Water System SOURCE!: COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT MASTER PLAN FOR PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM f EXHIBIT 72 ■ .... ,,., .. __ --c.--, ... _,,,.,tn. .... Reference should also be made to the following three documents which detail the specific facilities that are to be constructed or reconstructed, together with phasing, financing and implementation programs: a. "Master Plan for Public Water System," Costa Real Municipal Water District, February 1985, prepared by Woodside/Kubota and Associates, Inc. b. "Capital Improvement Plan," Costa Real Municipal Water District, July 15, · 1987, prepared by Costa Real Municipal Water District. c. "Draft Design Report for Public Water System," Kelly Ranch, dated January 1987, prepared by Woodside/Kubota and Associates, Inc. 3. Service Demand In the case of "design parameters" used for the master plan facilities, the Water Master Plan sets out the unit water 11duty11 values for the wide range of land uses that have been inventoried. Fire flow requirements are also cited. Additionally, the Kelly Ranch Design Report has specific data for the entire Kelly Ranch development, as well as all of Zone 8 and portions· of properties adjacent to the zone. Approximately 120 acres of the City of Carlsbad's proposed 282-acre Macario Canyon Park have been assigned a flow of 2,200 gallons per day per acre for irrigation in the Water Master Plan and the draft Design Report. The Design Report was developed using these same parameters. Service demand by planning area in Zone 8 is shown in Exhibit 73 on page 157. 4. Proposed Build Out Facilities The CRMWD Capital Improvements Plan addresses several projects to be funded, designed, constructed and maintained within the District. The primary facility included in the CIP which affects water service within Zone 8 is the Evans Point Reservoir and related facilities, including service lines into and out of the tank. The total cost of this project is $1.2 million, with $240,000 allocated for the 1988-89 fiscal year. The project description, excerpted from the CRMWD Capital Improvements Plan, is provided in Appendix H. All other master plan facilities within Zone 8 will be the responsibility of property owners/developers. 156 EXHIBIT 73 WATER DEMAND/SUPPLY BY PHASE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------WATER D W E L L I N G S REQUIREMENT ADEQUACY OF SUPPLY SYSTEM ALREADY PHASE AREA PHASED ACCUMULATED GALLONS/DAY IN SERVICE OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED (1) (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1990 KELLY (A) 144 57,600 Existing 12• main in Park Drive CD) 84 33,600 (See Note 1) (G) 59 23,600 New 14° •in in Cannon Road to CC) 99 39,600 serve this phasa 386 386 154,400 1991 KELLY (C) 9 3,600 New 1011 Md 16• water mains in (H) 50 20,000 Oceenaire Ave to serve this phase. (I) 88 35,200 Also, high pressure water service (K) 62 24,800 fr011 Evans Point Reservoir to (E) 116 46,400 serve Area •J•. 325 711 130,000 1992 KELLY CJ) 32 12,800 Conti~tfon of •ins in Oceanaire CL) 20 8,000 Ave, Construction of 10• water (N) 26 10,400 •ins Md P/R stations. (0) 61 24,400 CE) 99 39,600 (F) 6.1 ac. 18,300 238 949 113,500 1993 KELLY (P) 64 25,600 Service fr011 new facilities already (Q) 68 27,200 constructed in Oceanaire and ex.ten· (R) 111 44,400 sfon of water fr0111 Evans Point (N) 7 2,800 Reservoir. 250 1,199 100,000 1994 KELLY CM) 14 6,690 Service fr011 new facilities already KJRGIS 11 17.600 constructed in Oceanaire and exten· sion of water fr011 Evans Point 25 1,225 24,290 Reservoir. MACARIO 0 1,225 264,000 New 12: main in Faraday Avenue. TOTAL 1,225 786,190 NOTES: 1. Actual phasing sequence lll8Y vary provided that all necessary infrastructure requirements are met. Dwelling units fr0111 Area D can be transfered to remaining areas south of Cannon Road (see Exhibit 15 on page 35). 2. Assunes CRMll>'s Master Plan unit demand factors. MAJOR FACILITIES OF CRMII> IMPACTING ZONE 8: 1. Evans Point Reservoir· Estimated construction in 1991. 2. El Camino Real Transmission Main· Coq,letion in 1988. 3. High Pressure Water Service· in Faraday Ave., west of El Camino Real · Coq,letion 157 - - - Water transmission facilities to serve the proposed development in Zone 8 are shown in Exhibit 71 on page 154. These facilities include: No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Facility 14" Water Line 16" Water Line 1011 Water Line (2) Pressure Reducing Stations 12" Water Line Pressure Reducing Sta. and 16" Feeder Line 12" Water Line Evans Point Reservoir Location Cannon Road Oceanaire Avenue Oceanaire Avenue Oceanaire Avenue Faraday Avenue Reservoir to Faraday Village R Village R The proposed 14" water line in Cannon Road will serve the first phase of development south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Development to the north will be served by the existing· 12" in Park/Kelly Drive. New 10" and 16" mains will be constructed to serve the second phase south of Can~on Road as development proceeds upslope. The remaining three phases will be served by extensions of these mains in Oceanaire Avenue. The construction of the 12" main in Faraday Avenue will depend on the phasing of Macario Canyon Park which is as yet undetermined. All major distribution transmission facilities now in use have sufficient capacity to provide service with the current phasing identified in the district CIP. An important issue to recognize is that the original transmission mains constructed in the period of 1957- 1960 have an estimated useful life of 50 years. It is projected that the time for replacement should approximate the time when the new larger sized transmission mains will be needed. 158 Evans Point Reservoir The Evans Point Reservoir project, described in Appendix H, is a 2. 5 million gallon facility that will provide for the future water needs of Zone 8 and adjacent zones. The Costa Real Water District has selected a site for the location of the Reservoir within Zone 8 (Village R). Zone 8 is conditioned to dedicate the site prior the recordation of the first final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, within the zone. It is possible that the Evans Point Reservoir may be needed by development within adjacent zones prior to any development within Zone 8 • If the CRMWD District Engineer determines that the reservoir is needed for other development, the site will have to be purchased by those property owners for dedication to the CRMWD. As a condition of approval of Zone 8, reimbursement of all costs associated with the acquisition of the site and· appropriate easements shall be made to the developer who purchased the site for dedication to the CRMWD. Reimbursement shall be made prior to the recordation of the first final map, grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, in Zone 8. s. Average 10-oay storage capacity The adopted performance standard requires a minimum ten(lO) day storage capacity. storage capacity within the system is currently 12.9 days. The District's system design assures that a minimum of ten days storage supply .will be available. Projections to 1993 indicate that growth demands on future facilities will increase storage to 14.1 days. The storage capacity for the district is as follows: STORAGE CAPACITY current -1988 Projected Storage Capacity 168.0 MG 253.5 Average Daily Demand 13.1 MG 18.0 Days of Storage 12.9 14.1 12 Estimated expansion project cost: $7,000,000. 159 -1993 12 MG MG B. PHASING The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. Phasing boundaries are shown on Exhibit 71 on page 154 and correlate with property boundaries or logical boundaries for the proposed water facilities within the zone. Thresholds for the major water facilities within each phase can be easily established thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The phasing boundaries allow for independent review and development for the water facilities within each boundary. However, the water district may require improvements outside of the phase boundaries if deemed necessary to serve development. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Zone 8 currently conforms with the adopted performance standard. Since CRMWD requires development to install domestic water and fire-flow needs as a condition to future development, conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained to the ultimate build out of Zone 8. III. MITIGATION 1. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, the developers shall dedicate the Eva~s Point Reservoir site and appropriate easements to the Costa Real Municipal Water District to the satisfaction of the District Engineer. If this site has been previously purchased by another developer for the purpose of dedication to the Costa Real Municipal Water District, reimbursement of all costs associated with the acquisition of the site and appropriate easements shall be made to that developer prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8. 2. All development within Zone 8 shall pay the appropriate connection fee as required by the Costa Real Municipal Water District. 160 3. Prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first in Zone 8, a financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of the following water facilities shall be approved: Facility Location Area E Area F Area G Area H Area I Area J Area K Area L Area M Area N Area o Area P Area Q Area R Macario canyon Facility 14" Water Main 14" Water Main 14" Water Main 1011 Water Main 14" Water Main 1011 Water Main 1011 water Main 10" Water Main 10" Water Main 1011 Water Main 1011 Water Main 1011 Water Main 10" Water Main 10" Water Main 10" Water Main 10" Water Main 12" Water Main Length (feet) 2,400 800 1,200 400 700 500 550 850 600 500 300 400 800 250 400 350 2,400 4. The 14" water main in Cannon Road between El Camino Real and Faraday must be installed concurrent with the construction of cannon Road. rv. FINANCING The construction of regional water facilities servicing the zone will be financed by the CRMWD. Local facilities will be paid for through water · connection fees paid by property owners and/or developers prior to construction. Funding of major infrastructure improvements required for the development of Kelly Ranch has been provided in the form of Agreements and Bonds in favor of the Costa Real Municipal Water District, as provided by the developers of Kelly Ranch. These infrastructure improvements will also provide for the development anticipated on the Kirgis property. Funding for the improvements for the Macario canyon Park will be provided by the City in accordance with the various funding mechanisms cited in the City's Park Master Plan. 161 -- Exhibit 74 below shows the estimated cost of water facilities for each planning area and Exhibit 75 on page 163 describes the individual facilities to be financed, the estimated costs and timing of construction, existing budgeted CIP monies available and future funding options. Exhibit 74 WATER FACILITIES COSTS lJ KELLY RANCH PLANNING AREA ESTIMATED COST A C E F G H I J K L M N 0 p Q R Existing 12" Existing 12" Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service Water Service SUBTOTAL Macario Park (12" main) 16" Main (from future water tank) TOTAL $ 87,600 29,200 53,960 38,240 13,970 21,590 15,240 12,700 7,620 10,160 20,320 6,350 10,160 8,890 .· -------- $336,000 71,520 60,480 ========== $468,000 14 13 A detailed cost breakdown is provided in Appendix H. 14 City of San Diego unit prices. adjusted for inflation. 162 Current prices should be EXHIBIT 75 ZONE 8 -I/ATER FACILITIES FINANCING MATRIX AS OF 12/21/88 FUNDING OPTIONS EST I MATED ---------------------------------------------·------------ FACILITY AMOUNT COST TIMING I FIRST SECOND THIRD I NOTES ==•=•••=•=•==•============•=z===========:==========•==========••••••••============:===============•==•••=-•=•===a=====s====•===-======•===••a:==============•===== I/ATER FACILITIES KELLY RANCH Area E -14" 1/ater Main 2,400 LF S87,600 Concurrent w/ Developer LF = Lineal feet Area F -14" llater Main 800 LF S29,200 Development Area G -14" llater Main 1,200 LF S43,800 . 1011 llater Main 400 LF S10, 160 II Area H -14" 1/ater Hain 700 LF S25,500 H 1011 1/ater Hain 500 lf S12,740 H Area I -10" 1/ater Hain 550 Lf S13,970 .. Area J -10" llater Hain 850 lf $21,590 " Area K 10" llater Hain 600 LF S15,240 N Area L 10" I.later Hain 500 LF S12,700 " Area M 10" 1/ater Hain 300 LF S7,620 Area N -10" llater Hain 400 LF S10, 160 ti Area O -10" llater Hain 800 LF S20,320 .. Area P -10" I.later Hain 250 LF S6,350 .. Area Q 10" 1/ater Hain 400 LF S10, 160 .. Area R 10" llater Hain 350 LF S8,890 " .... --... --· --. -- S336,000 MACARI O CANYON 1211 llater Hain 2,400 LF S71,520 H City EVANS POINT RESERVOIR <2 •il lion gal Ion) S1,200,000 1990 CRIU> CRIU> • Costa Real 1611 1/ater Hain 1,400 LF $60,480 Concurrent w/ Municipal llater Dev. and District District lq>'t =-----==----- TOTAL 'IIATER COSTS S1 ,668,000 163 ) ·-- FACILITY FINANCING MATRIX The financing section of this completes the analysis by available to fund these public matrix is present on Exhibit matrix supplies the following: Local Facilities Management Plan providing financing mechanisms facilities. A facility financing 76 beginning on page 165. This 1. Identification of the Facility. The identification of each facility includes both the actual facility and land acquisition and operation where appropriate. 2. Amount-~ The area in acres (ac) , lineal feet (LF) or number of units of a particular facility. 3. Estimated Cost. The cost estimate for each facility is based on the most accurate information as of the writing of this plan. The costs are in 1987-88 dollars and will be updated as yearly monitoring takes place. 4. Timing. The projected date the facility will be constructed. 5. Funding Options. The funding sources are listed in priority order and include City sources, developer sources and public financing sources. In many cases, a combination of sources are proposed. At the end of each facility summary is a list of projects that are currently budgeted in the City's approved 1987-1992 Capital Improvement Program. Various financing options are summarized in the Executive summary of this report on page l. 164 ) FACILITY AMOUNT ESTIMATED COST EXHIBIT 76 • page 1 TIMING !FIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES ---------=-------------•=••••••-•====--=--------------==--=--=-=---zaca-----=---==----:zsz:c:-=■•a-=---=--=----=-=-•••••z•==-=--------------=-=------==•------- CI TY ADMINISTRATION 1. Las Palmas Purchase 22,627 sf S2,500,000 1987·97 2. Safety Center Phase II 62,000 sf S3,710,000 1992-97 3. New City Hall NA S23, 100,000 1997+ ===========:a:= TOTAL CITY AOMINISTRATIOII COSTS S29,310,000 1987·'92 CIP has a balance forward of 510,589 frm City Hall R-,del. FACILITY AMOUIIT ESTIMATED COST TIMING !City· PFF 'City • PFF/SII City • PFF I !FIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD PFF=Publ ic Facilities fees S= Sewer Enterprise Finl M=Vater Enterprise Finl NOTES --=•==----=---=-::.---==---•==-------=-z=s--------=-=-----m-=s:z=-----===z==-----=-=----===-=--=-=--•-=•=-=•-----==z-=--•-===-=------==•--=------------------=•- L I BRARY FACILITIES 1. library Remodel 2. library· for Build out Population 3. library • South Carlsbad TOTAL FACILITY Unknown 15,331 sf 58,000 sf LIBRARY COSTS 13,948,000 S5,060,000 S18, 112,000 ===========:ic= S27, 120,000 ESTIMATED COST 1997+ !City • PFF I 1997+ City • PFF 1988-2008 City • Pff TIMING !FIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOIIO THIRD PFF=Publ ic Facil I ties Fees NOTES z-:-s-----------------=-•••a•s-:::c-s------:-::-:--------------c-=--=•=•=-------=----=---------:sa::a:asaaa==----------------=-=•===a=••c===-------------::1:::1------- YASTEYATER FACILITIES 1. Encina Outfall Upgrade SB,800,000 1992-1997 sewer Fees 2. Encina Outfal I P~'3 S325,000 1987·88 Sewer fees l. Enclna Phase IV Expansion S11,278,000 1987·91 Sewer Fees 4. Encina Solids M-g-,it S10,000,000 1987·91 Sewer Fees ••===••s••••• TOTAL IIASTEIIATER COSTS S30,403,000 165 ) EXHIBIT 76 • page 2 ... -. ---.. -...... -............ --.. ---.. ------..... -............ ---.... -----.. -..... ----------.. ---· -.. -----.. --.... ---.... --.. -.. ---.. -. -------... -........ -----.. --...... -----------.. -... -.... -.. -. -... -- fACILITY AMOOIIT ESTIMATED CDSl TIMING jFIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES ====•••=•sc::zs:==============sas:c•==========zs::::■s2s:1a:::::=========•••••====z=========•============••••c=:iz•====•-=••c======:::========•••=•=======•••====za:sa: ·PARK FACILITIES -PARK DISTRICT 1 .. --.. -.. ---...... ---... --.. --.. ---------... ---.. -........ -.... ---.... ----..... ----.... -...... ----..... ---.. --... ----. ---.. ---.. ----......... ------------.................................... --------.. --------.. -................ -- 1. land Aquisition ·Pina Senior Citizen Center 3.0 ac $1,447,000 •Pine Street School 7.0 IC $3,500,000 2. Design and Construction ·Pine Senior Citizen Center l.O ac $3,500,000 $300,000 ·Pine Street School 7.0 ac $805,DOO ·C-.nl ty Center $1,500,000 ·Camon lalc.e 6.7 ac $770,500 ·Macario 25 ac S7,D25,000 3. lq,rovetnent Costs 8.8 ac Sl,012,0DO 4. Operations Cost (1) TOT Al P'-RKS COSTS: $19,659,500 CIP Budget: 1988 1263,662 (Pine Sr. Center) •88· •69 13,500,000 (Pine Sr. Center) 1997+ S7,000,000 (Macario) 1997+ 1770,500 (Cannon lalc.e) 1997+ $805,000 (Pine Sr. Center) '997+ Sl,'.i00,000 (Pine St. School) 1997+ Sl,447,000 (Pine Sr. Center) Balance forward S25,000 (Macario) S16,338 (Pine Sr. Center) Notes: (1) To be determined within the Parks Agreement. 1 fi6 1997+ 1997+ 1988· '89 1988 1997+ 1997+ 1997+ 1997+ Concurrent w/ Development City •· PFF City· Pll (NII) City • TIB State Grant City • PFF City PFF City PFF City • PFF Developer wt th Reimbursement PFF • P~llc Facll i ties Fee Pll • Park•ln·Lleu Fees llB • lax lncr-nt Bonds ) FACILITY AMCXJNT ESTIMATED COST EXHIBIT 76 • page 3 TIMING FIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES =========•===============•====s=:s:============•=•=•=====•s======•••=======•========••=z=====s•=s=====•=================•••========s=======•-=========•========= CIRCULATION FACILITIES Camon Road from half width $5,200,000 1990 City • Pff Assessnmt PFF " Plt>llc Facll lty Faraday Ave to I ·5 District fees C8fVIOl'I Road f rOII half width $5,500,000 1990 Developer Assessment EI Cami no Real to Faraday District El Camino Real & cannon Road signal S85,0DO 1990 City· Pff Developer Camon Road & I ·5 (SB) dual left $51,000 1990 Assessment District turn li.ne Camon Road & I ·5 (NB) dual left $42,000 1990 Assessment District turn lane Camon Road & I ·5 signal S120,DOO 1990 City PFF Developer Camon Road & Paseo del Norte signal S65,000 1991 City PFF Developer Camon Road from full width $1,763,000 1995 Developer Assessment 1·5 to El Camino Real District ======#==-==== TOTAL CIRCULATION COSTS S12,826,000 167 ) ) ,1 FACILITY DRAINAGE FACILITIES AGUA HEOIONDA CREEK IIATERSHED Area A (Kelly Ranch) 1. 54" Stor11 Drain 2. 36' Stona Drain 3. 0esiltation Basin Area E 1. 30" Stona Drain Area I 1. 36" Storm Drain 2. 30" Storm Drain Area J 1. 30" Stonn Drain Area O 1. 30" Stor11 Drain Area Q • 1. oesiltation Basin Subtotal MACARIO CANYON 1. Open Channel 2. n• Stona Drain 3. 54 Stor11 Drain Subtotal AIIOOIIT 320 LF 150 Lf 2 1,200 LF 500 LF 280 Lf 580 LF 80 LF 5,200 LF 1,200 LF 600 LF TOTAL DRAINAGE COSTS 168 ESTIMATED COST $48,000 $15,000 $80,000 $96,000 $50,000 $22,400 $46,400 $6,400 S80;000 $444,200 $468,000 S?16,000 563,000 $747,000 SI, 191,200 ) EXHIBIT 76 • page 4 TINING FIRST Concurrent 11/0evelopaent ff ff . " II • • .. . Developer " H City " FUIID I NG OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES LF • Lineal Feet FACILITY AMOUNT ESTIMATED COST EXHIBIT 76 • page 5 TIMING !FIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES s=======sa:ca••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••=■s■■■■■ FIRE FACILITIES 1. Fire Station No. 5 10,000 SF S1,680,000 1988 City • PFF PFF • Publ le Facl 11 ty ( Including apparatus) Fees 2. Fire Station #3 3,500 SF $451,000 1992·97 City • PFF SF • Square Feet Relocation ....•......•• TOTAL FI RE COSTS S2, 131,000 CIP Budget: '87· '88 SI ,680,000 (Station 5) 169 ) FACILITY AMOUNT ESTIMATED COST EXHIBIT 76 • page 6 TIMING jFIRST FUNDING OPTIONS SECOND THIRD NOTES ==========z=========••s===========:z:zz:::z::::z::s:============•=•••a==•=====================••=-==========:z==:z=======••••===••=======i:::=====••••••111=:z=z=z:cz:::cz===••==== SEIIER FACILITIES SAHi SEIIERAGE BASIN 1. Stage Lift Station S514,000 1990 Assessmo,nt District Developer LF • Lineal Feet 2. Stage Force Main 2,400 Lf S336,000 1990 Assessmo,nt District Developer 3. Reach 2,300 LF 1313,200 1990 Assessment District Developer 4. Reach 2 2,200 LF S297,000 1990 Assessment District Developer 5. Reach 4 3,SDD LF S472,500 1990 Assessment District Developer 6. Stage 2 Lift Station S550,DOO 2000 Assessment District Developer 7. Stage 2 Force Main 2,400 LF S300,000 2000 Assessment District Developer ========:::i::zi::::i:: TOTAL SEIIER COSTS S2, 782,700 170 EXHIBIT 76 • page 7 FUNDING OPTIDNS ESTIMATED •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• FACILITY AMDUNT COST TIMING jFIRST SECOND THIRD I NOTES =======•z====z====s====••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••==••===•====•a=•=•=-•==•====•==•=•=•====•=•••••••=•■■■a■:::::c:c:a: .. •••••••••••=•••••••••••••••••••••• I/ATER FACtLITIES KELLY RANCH Area E 14" llater Main 2,4DD LF Area F 1411 llater Main 8DD LF Area G 1411 llater Main 1,200 LF 10• ll■ter Main 400 LF Area H 1411 llater Main 700 LF 1011 ll■ter Main 500 LF Area I 10" llater Main 550 LF Area J • 1011 llater Main 850 LF Area K 10" llater Mair\ 600 LF Area L • 1011 ll■ter Main 500 LF Area M 1011 llater Main 3DD LF Are■ N 1011 llater Main 4DD LF Area O • 1011 llater Main 800 LF Area P 1011 llater Main 250 LF Area Q 1011 llater Ma In 400 LF Area R 1011 llater Main 350 LF MACARI O CANYDN 1211 llater Main 2,400 LF EVANS POINT RESERVOIR (2 •II I Ion gallon) 16N llater Main 1,400 LF TOTAL IIATER COSTS 171 S87,600 S29,200 S43,8DO S10, 160 525,500 S12, 740 S13,970 S21,590 $15,240 S12, 700 S7,620 $10,160 S20,320 $6,350 S10, 160 $8,890 ...................... S336,DDO S71,520 Sl,200,000 S60,48D ··••-====••··· $1,668,000 Concurrent w/ Deve I opment 1990 Concurrent w/ Dev. end District lq,'t Developer City CRIM> LF .. L lneal FHt CRMIID • Costa Real Municipal llater District -- APPENDIX A Kirgis. Property Reports And -Letters i,:. R.obert ~f... Ga.ll0',':2.y .::i-:-::.i o::-·1ic c :::i:-~sid.ent I~~u!:1;.~n ~-:5rcct.d lHC'l 1,ilr:ihire .d:::ulev~rd 9;32 ?inot:::ce Jourt San Jooe, C~lifornia 951~5 Jan;;.ary 29 t 1987 io::; ,.::cslc:3, :;diforni:=i. 9C0i::!5-l 748 RECEIVED FEB 2 1987 TECHNICAL SERVICES D£1'L --· ----c~ 2 ~·: r';; s to rcy P~=r,e::-t:,·. e~i~~i~~ €;se=ants s~dct I held I t::-ust. 'l.hn.t a.ue consiaer:"!:tion bP-given t(') rny Ir. this ::-egP.rd, attention is ~.i.rected. to the :::.nd. v:hioh nre :-eoorcl.en in s~n :::>iego. I :-l~:i'.'" to stc:, t:, E'ee :.ro·:.i in the ne~ !'utl:.re nt \'ihich time \"e can dis::u~:.-- c·::.::-r:~~t·~~-1 prc".:ile:::::: in {;re:::te!' c.-:?t;ii.il. ... .., ~ .. . . -... ' -., .. ., -~ -: ... -.; .... __ .... •.:. .... -.. ____ ..,.·t· ••• --- - Exhibit I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 212-010-03 As owner(~~ of the above parcel located within Zone 8 of the Carlsbad Local Facility Management Zone hereby agree to the preparation of the Zone 8 Plan by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. on behalf of Kel-Cal, owners of the Kelly Ranch. It is understood that the consultants to be used will be: 1. Turrini and Brink -Planning Consultants 2. VTN San Diego -Consulting Civil Engineer 3. Woodside & Kubota System Consultants on Water Distribution 4. William N. Hofman -Consultant It is also understood that all fees in connection with the preparation, submission and approval of the subject Local Facility Management Plan for Zone 8 will be paid for by others, and there will be no financial obligation against the subject property either now or in the future in connection with said submission and approval. Date Date STe:PHe:N M. L·He:uRe:ux ATTORNEY AT LAW 7OZ FOURTH STIIICCT POST O,-,-1cc 80:K 458 OCCANSIOC, CALll"ORNIA 92054 TCI.CPHONC 18191 7ZZ-1308 March 15, 1984 Mr. Jonathan D. Friestedt Senior Vice-president KAUFMAN AND BROAD 11601 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles,. CA 90025 Dear Mr. Friestedt: FEB 2 31987 TECH[~!CAL SERVICES DEPl. You have requested that I provide you with a legal opinion on the following issues relative to Tentative Tract Map 83-30 for the Kelly property: · l. Does HOWARD Kirgis have legal and practical access to his property other than through the proposed development? ANSWER: Yes. 2. Does HOWARD Kirgis have the right to demand that the developer provide him with road and utility easements through the subdivision in order to serve his property? ANSWER: No. In ar=iving at these conclusions, I have made certain assumptions, and the continuing effectiveness of this opinion is dependent upon them remaining unchanged: 1. That the final· ::.treet alignments accepted by the City will be as shown on Tentative Tract Map 83-30, dated September 23, 1983: and 2. That the Agreement and Mutual Easement Deed of October 1963, between INVESTMENT SECURITIES CORPO- RATION, TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, AGRARIA INVESTMENT CORPORATION, S. L. KELLY, HOWARD G. K!RGIS, and IDA B. KIRGIS, MARVIN H. SIPPEL, LUCIA CAROLYN SIPPEL, ALLAN O. KELLY, LAVINIA J. KELLY, HERBERT C. KELLY, GRAHAM M. KELLY, MAXINE T. SMITH, BARBARA JEAN HIGDON and DOROTHY KELLY as Guardian of CHARLES DAVID KELLY, a minor, and recorded on March 26, 1964 in the Office of the County·Recorder of San Diego County has not been revoked o= - --- Mr. Jonathun D. Friestedt Page 2 March 15, 1984 modified as it pertains to the easement rig~ts granted to the Kirgis property: and 3. That the Mutual Easement Agreement dated June 24, 1965 between AGRARIA INVESTMENT CORPORATION, IRWIN J. KELLY and TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY as Trustee, HOWARD G. KIRGIS and IDA B. KIRGIS, and ALLAN o. KELLY recorded on October 18, 1965 for Public Utilities has not been revoked; and 4. That since March 26, 1964, HOWARD Kirgis has taken access to his property by means of the road easements granted to him in the Agreement and Mutual Easement Deed of October, 1963. Discussion Road and utility easements can be created by either an express grant or reservatidn, by the Courts on theories of necessity or prescriptive use. (Civil Code Section 802: Leonard v. Hayden (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 263). The October 1963 Mutual Easement Deed to which Kirgis and his wife were sign~tories is an express grant to him and his successors of legal access for his land by means of several defined road easements over the adjoining lands of the other parties to the Deed. In addition to the grant of the specific easements, Kirgj, has for over 20 years 3Ctually used the road easer.ients gra,.. .: i·n the Deed in ord( to obtain access to his property. Th: 1se of the road easeL ts, coupled with the eY.press grant _n the easement Deed, ensures Kirgis and his successors of continuous access to his land under the terms of that Deed, independent of any development that may occur on Kelly's lanci. The fact that access to Kirgis's property through the subdivision might be more convenient is not sufficient grounds for creating an easement in his favor, either by necessity or by ioplication, outside of the terms of the express grant. In _view o! the existing easement deed, a Court would only create an easement through Kelly's land by implication or estoppel if it were convinced that the parties (Kelly and Kirgis) had actually intended to create such an easement, but for some reason had failed to do so. {Leonard v. Havden, supra). Likewise, there would be no basis for the Court's finding an easement through Kelly's land under the doctrine of necessity. Such an easement is created only where the servient and dominant lands were in common ownership, but as result of a conveyance by Mr. Jonathan D. Friestedt Page 3 March 15, 1984 the common owner, one parcel become completely landlocked. (Daywalt v. Walker (1963) 217 Cal.App.2nd ~69; Reese v. Borghi (1963) 216 Cal.App.2nd 324). Additionally, the easement must be absolutely necessary in order to get access to the landlocked parcel. The California Supreme Court clearly stated the rule when it said M[an easement by necessity] will not exist where a man can get to his property through his own land. That the way over his own land is too steep or too narrow, or that other and like difficulties exist, does not alter the case, and it is only where there is no way through his own land that a grantee can claim a right over that of his granter. It must also appear that the grantee has no other way." Kripp v. Curtis (1886) 71 Cal. 62, 65. Here, Kirgis possesses an express set of road and utility easements to serve his land. The written Deed specifically identifies the location of the roads, and the properties that are both benefited by and burdened by the easements. Further, the Deed specifically states that the rights and the road easements created by the Deed attach to, and run with the lands identified in the Deca for the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of all of the parties named in the Deed. In view of this document, there is no basis, need or necessity to create additional easements by necessity or prescription to serve any of Kirgis' property. It should also be remembered that during the last 20 years Kir;is has actually obtained access to his property by means of the roads created under the Mutual Easement Deed. Thus, by his use of these roads, he has effectively acknowledged the existence of the ease~ents since their creation. Therefore, since Kirgis does have legal and existing access to his lands by means of the roads as set forth in the Easement Deec, there is no legal requirement that ICAUFMAN & BROAD design or redesign its subdivision so as to provide him with better or more convenient access. Another issue to next be considered is that if Kirgis already has legal and practical vehicle and utility access to his property outside the development, can the City require the developer to provide him with additional road and utility access through the development? The S~bdivision Map Act does authorize a city to require the dedication of real property within a subdivision fo~ streets and public utilities. (Gov~rnment C:ode Section 66475). Additionally, .-Mr. Jonathan D. Friestedt Page 4 March 15, 1984 Paragraph 12 of Section 20.16.010 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code states that in developing the street plan for a major subdivision, •considerations• are to be given so as to ensure the proper development of abutting properties. Obviously, some of the •considerations" that need to be analyzed would include the topography and geology of the proposed road alig~ments, its costs, and the benefits to be derived to both the subdivision and to the adjoining property owner. It should be further noted that the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Sections 66485 and 66486) and Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.041 both provide that where improvements are required to be installed by the subdivider for the benefit of both its development and that of adjacent property, then those improvements that are in excess of the construction required for the subdivision are to be reimbursed to the subdivider. However, neither the Act nor the Code require the developer to provide improved access to adjacent property owners without compensation, unless those improvements are otherwise necessary for the design and/or functioning of the subdivision. (See Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 20.16.030(£) concerning the dedication of streets beyond the boundaries of a subdivision so as to provide adequate circulation for residents of the subdivision). It is also interesting to observe that in Section 66478.14 of the Map Act, which deals with providing public access to public resources (oceans, streams etc.), it provides that nothing in the Act shall be construed so as to require a subdivider to improve any access routes which are primarily for the benefit of non-residents of the subdivision area, or for the benefit of non-owners of the real property in question. Therefore, if such a condition cannot be imposed for that purpose, then it would certainly appear that the the City cannot require the installation by a developer of streets and utilities in order to serve adjacent property which does not otherwise benefit the subdivision. Since Kirgis has other existing legal road and utility access to his property, a right of way through the development is not legally necessary. Rather, such an access would merely be a convenience to him and his property. As such, this is a private matter that should be resolved between Kirgis and Kaufman and Broad, and should not be of concern to the City. Very truly yours, STEPHEN M. L'HEUREUX DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE Frank Elfend Elfend & Associates ([itp of ~arlsbab February 6 , 1985 1601 Dove Street, Suite 160 Newport Beach, California 92660 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438•5591 Tc.CHf-i!Cf,L SERVICES D£PT. RE: KELLY RANCH MASTER PLAN/ACCESS TO KIRGIS PROPERTY Dear Frank: This is to confirm our verbal discussion regarding future access to the Kirgis property from the Kelly Ranch property. This issue is discussed in Note No. 13 to Table III-1 on page 18 of the Kelly Ranch Master Plan. The intent of this section was as follows: (1) To insure that potential future access to the Kirgis property was not precluded if a tentative map for Area R was submitted before a tentative map was submitted by Kirgis for his property: (2) The developer of Area R would not be required to study alterna~ives (engineering and environmental) for access to the Kirgis property, only to not "close the door" to leaving available the possibility of future access through Kelly Ranch: (3) The developer of Area R would not be required to pay for ~ny future access to the Kirgis property: (4) If a tentative map is submitted for the Kirgis property prior to a map being processed on Area Rand it shows clternative access ~ccentable to the citv, Note No. 13 is satisfied; -.. (5) O:ily if it is determined to be necessary by t:.e :::i-:.y :S:-ic;inee::::-, based upon the information available at the time a te~tative ~ap is ;=□=essed for Area R, would any public dedications be required across the Kelly Ranch to serve the Kirgis property. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF CARLSBAD La~d Use Planning Manager -- ·- - .... . --~-.•-... ~-"'-·-, .... -. .. ... --· ·-... · .. ----···-...... ----· i: . ... ..;-•-.. --...-. ::l~;-:.-:-i .r.s !b£.C! £t4 on A L"J> !ilod ,:: :..~ c.~bit. with a ?-:U~ Ro:i.d J::;:.sc:e:-:. ;.ae:! -~:r::.::..:cn~, r~corded /.arch 26,' 1964, ~ :COC".i:ent. io. SS!:SB, S-l:"i.cs S, :::::,~:, l96~ •t iwi,N'~ Uh", WC: ··=·::'"r;.iv,•~c·d;:. ;.;,., .. r, ,. :.1, .. IU .1,11,I ,,Jr ..... , s1~., ... 1,rr:.,.d:all.r .,.,cared ~.""-~-~ ·rr··..,~-····· ·····•-· -.. . . . ----------------------,--.::..---kuown 10 1111:: 10 be lhc peraoaa wbo1c 111,111e.-~- _.;;1,...,.::.i 1,, ,;:~ wi1bi11 ln1•rnm~111 Alkl ackuowlcdr,:cli ll•~•····.-1·"""'····-... c•rcu•cd tltc ~ • ..,. \\"ITl':1-::iS IDJ la:a1"1 aad nllicial .-aL i. ~~~>.~ ;,~.;; ;·~ ;~IOZ:!':llA\IGITti ~ · • ._. · ... ,;,.cy --i•.::.1,~_-c .. ·.::r-0r.::u. · I· • ;::. "/ Pium.::~AL o: ►•~• 1r1 '· -.._ ~ ""' illt:iO COUll.'T'I' i► rs; i..uzc -.. .... ••••••• ......... ......._....._...,, «a } ss. (Name• T7'rtl n Prirtl•tll Nlllary Public ia and lcw alcl Siate IOTD L ;.'ll01NIJ.U;iH. tl•l•"I P.t.::. ;,, .... f., ti.. s, •••• f c.u1-;. My ,:~Ilia t,,.;,11 Av9111I II. .. , •• ST,\TE OP' CAUP'.,PIUUo/\ ~Ot::."TY OF nt!Mcs c Y/.: di- On -.'<41 ◄ ~ t'..). t'fl'4-l"'7 bef-me. tli. llftdCl'lillftltl. a Notar,, Public In ud for nid State. pencul!7 1;::iure. ,L ,//./~,..,O-~~•<w5~•-------------- -----------------------.--..,. ,I_--,J.::: li110WD. to me to be the pcr1on wb01e nam~--·. lllbscrillcd to CM widlin Im"-&_. admowltdpd Illa~ die --. WJ~ESS m1 band and olllcial seal. ao:o 111a aa14 ...... •• ._..iNlhtel ...__,, •• a ••~••• , STAT: CP: CAUfORNIA } COUNTY OF S~w MA7c0 SS (NIIDI • T7pn •• l'rilfl,tl) Noiary Public in and for aai4 S~tc ~~:» J. :r.rwE:-:::-.,t.:o:-,. :., .• ,., ;•.!J~ ,., •: ...... '~ ti\~-St.a?• e£ ~;;!;:r.;. r '-M'""'"•e-n u;,:,., 1...-,:.n ''• ii~/ QN_,:;-s;_r.?..z:____ ;,Q. _ .. -·----··--········ .. 19.~be!o:e r: .. - GINll.t.L ACKNOWLlDGMINT ,_..._,. 'htMI C ( C.,1•.r11ioD) undersigned, a Notary Public in and for uid County and State, pcrsor.:..:!y ::;;: • I' -... • ,,,,,,,----.,. • •• -• --_.., _,!,; __ . .!:.!::.?.!::~-~~.-~?.-.!..Cl.:.'?..}2:: . ..?_ ...... (.::?;:::t:a ....•.. ...i:.~,::· .. -... ::'.--.. ~.~-' kno\\-n to me to be the person ... '< who...i lUlmC.:.... .. _. • .r..:,,.:.:. i;1,1hJcrii1td to ~l:,; •· STATE OF c:.u.rron~IA } CC,t;:,\TY or_ .... , __ ,;....,,•(c-..il=i(:.t:.·:...G[;. .. ~• ,1.1;.'r'.,iL;..(lli:~-.. , .. ·__ "s. f11111enaw..,..,....,._. • .,.u , ........ Nle ..... Na, - i\GP.l\.R:;, ~:•.•:: ~··. __ .. ..,. B:, :~ -~;;-:-~.~--- . ..: .· ... ......... c::- ~11-tt~t.ttlft114~~~~~i~~&t~~~ ~~~.qjt~~(:~· :·.\ ~/.-r:"I..J'·• ~~-,;-•.~!ft_ •;;-~-~~•~:5.t~•••g_:.:_ .. :1~~~ .. 1.-t~~~~ •if-!~~:-J}~<;_' ''.~:,;,;_;;•·:••::, .,.., ........ ,.-cc.-•.,.;. tr7. . ~ ~ -~-~~-"'~ '1\i. ~-1,;.-._ -~tz .. _,,_,at:i,.&~·.:..:r.:~~""':!.·)\: ~ ---~ ... ~'--,.,.J. :t. ...... • . . '~,,.;;..,,.~~~-·• ;r; ~--,...;_.,,i:t,-~:J.:$:·~ .~1""'::~;!i~ ,.,,-~ ''1.~~'-',;;..~~•J _..;;,. :l{J}. i·-; ~~ L 1 •. -"': · ·~--\•__ --~ •1?-~--~~-~-}-~·.f.:·tLt··:!_~·-.~~,:~:.:.~.. -"· IJ-•• • 1~.~ ' :.~: .. h ~ ~~:.,n.,; 1J9't; ••".-:,",7~,_~,• ~~,~..--u• -•:Jtfr=:.. .: •~ .. ~".!--.'}~ .. ;;...litil;;a:. A-4 :;~~ . __ __:__::_ . - ~--· -------------------------------------' f!.-,-------· .;,. -~-!!:/• ~ ;iii-. --·-~ ·-:~ .. ·-~, ";?U. 0if :=.;,"'la {;-,,._- .~ .. .:·-~ '"~--~,ir- ·,'.i;i1 : . ··--.... -,.._ '!'" . j 1 i I ! ·I • I i \ 1 ' . j j au,u sea:.:. '1'4 jj!'t.' ACIDMDT AIID MJffl\L ruDar PE!! °''"~'" •Ecoioa ., "' D1t•o cuu•n, caur. '-'-''-,n,arc111011 • / "J, fltla ACUDmn' AIID Nm1U IASIIIDIT 118D ..._ tllla CCIUOll4T10ll, • Callfanaia corponCMID0 Trru:: DSUU..:S AD nmT CCIG'AIIY, • caq,oneioa, ACIAJLJA DYD'Dc:lrf cauaunm. • ~-c1oo. Ii. L. m.t.'l'. IIOWUD c. r:uau .... Dll L UICU, . lAvtfflA J. S:ZU.'l'. IIZUDT C. UU.'l'. Jr.• aba "-•• HEUa:r CHlltLD m.L'r0 Jr.• GU.JIUI IC. ~. IIIXDI& T. SlllTll0 fonarl7 NUDZ T. McDCIIALD. U.UAJA JIAJI •~• abo _,_ .. !AUUA JZi\JI s:zu.y uc::i,ca, •Dd ooaanrr m.z.y •• euans.aa of CH.\RUS l».VtD IEU.'l', a Klnor. _v_1_T_tr_c_s_s_r._T_rt._ _ VICZ'.!:M, cha parciH banco &Dd CMJUD l:lt.ViD m.:.t, Acu.i. .m:i:>lCJm.A, 1D cba Collet}' of Sao Dlaso, Stat■ of Ca111onta, accord1116 t:i lbp thanof Ila. 023 f1la4' la CM OHi.ca •f daa eouc:,, ~cor~r of SaD Diaeo CouDtJ'. ~r 16. UH, · \;'".=m:,'1.:,0 1: 1a 1111:.1tu.al17 a:rHd by tba portlaa banto na~i.11& of r•co::-C: ui cba -• of cba pasclaa banca far BCV, -nm:maoa::. 1A coaaUarac1oo of tbo pn.1N■ and o! tho au==al baaafl.tc to accne, ucb of tba pal'Clal hue:o ~• naro'by 1r&11: acd coner co Cha oehar paRS..a I I , .. ...• ' ' ! -~ ,=---~ ~ritu ~::'"~~;~,.:;1 f ~•'.~f~t-~· t~~=j'!-"~ ~~~~-~. ,J!.ll ..... ~.,.-. '!.:~---.;..~:,.-. ,.:·~·t~ ~Ji• . .._.;.,. __ ,~- it~ ~~,~ ID .J·---~;..,J .=;~mjjiir;;;,;::~3 -~lti71 Jfth.~~:7.~1 -;~~~1 ~.•,;;;itl-1'!~ ·:;~.~ :,f~,-~;ft~] ~~~:,i:·. :,~i, -6>•-~:: ., • ~(};~~t:.t .• -4~, ,_t :;; ~ :ii . t' .i .,; 11 . ' .• -•l ,_. -. ~-.. .. ~~--··--·-~~ ··, .__,__,_ _ _____ .,...,,,-. .,,,;.' . -~:.· . . ---------•---. ~ ---......... _ _.. . ~~:'!"l~~'"'!'-=·~,,. .... -'.""' ______ . -------,.,------"'---ll!!!!'f!.,..~~~~ ·. ·:-.. -· ~t;: .... -iiai~;:.;.. .. :...:...~-•~,:,=.:·~-:-~·•·:·~··~➔::;;:•~·~4:2l •. ~;~-~-·~-2-'~:24$4:"P-:·~·~1~-:-;;;;:;1J<2·:E·::Z::~·:·~Q:~:•:·:,~•ii''~·~J-·~1~JJ.·.:.w:J •.. ,~\~~-1: ... ""~-·-·--· · ;:,;:;;-···· , .. ;,,,,·••ia• ...... ~\:,•►-~:.· ... · •. •:···· !:"'_.... •.. - --~- r u I. ~T.\TI·: m· C.-\J.1F011;-.;1,\ l , :,1L~T-.-, w. s:.~:_ ~-~r::co ______ f 01: __ Q.ct.ob~.a.,_u_6s. ____ hrf .. ,.. ""'· .,,.. 11111lcr•i1:nr,cl, A N111:1ry Pul,lic in nn,l r .. r •.ii,l !'i:.,li·. 'p,•r,..,1mllr :111fll',1r<'•' -· --i'l..__.t\ .J~H.CQC.u. .. ------------------· L ...... -11 ,,; 1111" ... "" ,1 ... ..t~s s .' .. t...__'lic.c____. l'r,·~i,l,·,11, 111111 .... J:L, y I LPJ:IJ _______ _ l..nown '" hlr' lo l11: __A!;i.::iis.t'1n t_. Srrn•li1ry nf ii,,. 1•nr1111r:i1iun lhat excr.u1cu llac within ln,lrUml'nl, Lu,,., n lo 1111• lo Ii,• 1111, !''''""'"' whn , .• ,,,-111,,,l thll wi1hi11 l11~1r11111,•ul 011 l11•li:ili nl lli'l 1·,,q1urn1inn 1llt'rr·i1i 1111111,·,l. "'"' ,h·L11owl,•,l;:,·1l 111 1111! thal• ~11..!1 1•uq1ur:ili11n cxrr111r·,l 1lu-"i1lii11 i:a,trunll'nl 1•11r,-11.;an1 lo i1~ hr-la,n or II r,•sohuiun o{ ii~ ltnnril .. r ,lirrclur., Name ('l':r1•r.1i nr l'r:mcJ) r ·i.J., :,1~,-: ~~ l"•,:: ~r:: r'~ r:' ~-• l'.'J;:t. l::. ::,:1. 3. -~ ~ r., '.~f~.:i=j-~il , :.• , .. :: ,, 4 ..... ,_ ... ~L~'.:!3 P"'" 1 :-:'>· ~-,.~·c.,.: ~-_ l ~-' ~: 5 . . ., ~ .-.,.,.;;: ·:..!.f:' .•~~-t .. :~l .. ,.~ ;~/ t , .......... • ...... • '-~r,°:!:~~ l f"" ..... ,..,,,,..·;!"".,- ~. , .. • ,. . • ~ t. -,. - -· .... --.. ----"""· . ·---- ~::;, 6. ·:.;-:.::..:. .c.-~ ..... rr:.--,0/1 //:.,: ~ ------------------------·-·------------·...--..--. r ..... :r •nanr. -Tit~, · alra, ::, I \n • •114 Hn.hnt u .. , llrt•t .. t3~ 7 ~r ~,·•t• A tl'IP •• ta ~, t1.:.;i ,:~ I ,~ s ':i,'c./ ~'.r' 9 iJ I H ~ i i • t l ~ ·~ I· ~ ~ . ' 'i 1 I: ,.-: l J ti ;i n ,.1 ;! ~i !! ;~ •J :1 j ~ I• 'l ij ,,: • {1/ l V \ .• D wtna:ss 'IIMDZOF Ch• partlu hereto haw cauHd Chi■ lA•t-oc Cob■ •MC\lted the da7 and 1••r f1rat here• llwlbo\,e ••t forth, l!l'VESlH!t,"l' S!Ct.Jain!S COP.POIATIOH, • corporatS.on I,' / -• I .-· ,, .• " 1/,,,:'f-k,rf.. //'~•-c~., .,., ____ -----,.~:-r-=,-:r.:~------Vic• l-Teal3enE lly ___ , .. , .. N.· ... _: .. f~L=-·=-ii::(;:;iiit"l~· tcii'Eir;;"-----·, ,; ,;.;t•tecntuy .ACM1UA INVIZn::DI':' COIU'0MTION, a corpo&ation -' ..... .•·: . .-·· ... c~~"t ; SD.~· .. ~ \. -~-... ~.·, . ~;~~;;· cououn S£1.L 7':AR "!; !;5: o-~-.v ~-1· 9 \ . l_ .,~, .... , . nx:•n .... ... ,,,,,.,. . _,, ·, --. •'-· 1 I ·-...... - .,.,1 J\J $,'.;_.,, of\;,{ ; . -· --~ --~--,...-=·-. ---·· F :;z.~~~,a.;,; ,,e;.,J,:Z;,;.;.trA-~t.~Ni'ir".::mr ,~ ; !?imm.•t~ > : : I i I ~ p I \ l ---.,. ___ . : I s ; I I • • u.,..i, ,1.-.tt: cu· ..:.uJFllRP-'IA • IIIINT\ Of 1,o■ W,.lU "• . ~&.JJ,~T 1.:)1 1964_ .................... ..-J. • N ... .., ,.wic .. ...i i.. ...., ,__., _.. :.. ..... 1-..... u, ,,..,.,. J"oU: t;..~. {, rr.:11~ ~•lJ!_ ... , ... . ,._ ...... liL-____ ,,....... .... ,So~r,-~~l. ~ .. -,."' , \ :" .J.. • '-'n'1.,7•lllw(..,...er-lllH•ua .... lth• ,...,,,1 ... 1..1r--.c1 ......... ,. -,. kl' ... ~-....... , ........ J -~ ,-u-,w.f ... ,_.... .. 1ori-.11f _. Uw ~-,...••-1)i.,,,,... ••-•'-,,.,J ~ • ... M•W\ll .. le-:1.it••"~1-,._,,_,. ... ....,. ....... ,thtf'.1__.,,.. l .::: _..~,..._.. .... ,t,y.i. ................... i.-,.:.., .. ll'ftl'"- ~ ~ • •·n:-cl!lll •r ~ _. .,_,.. waL . I ,,.._,, I\ r,,~ I,/. --1~ .. ~ .. , ~---~ .._ •✓, ':Ir._ ·1o -.:.0.,v,,,.! ~ -.... .,. •• :r. ,\prd Z It~, l!..:.~.z~a ~ IW1• N ... tr,~• l'.-u.lt ~ • .,,, r.w. '-u.,. , • ...., '---'' .... ~ ... ..... !•• '. ;f I s ...... (J!ll .. , ,,. "•·· .. c.--,.,.~..,,., b.-,_.,.. Oo '1),.,,-,fFA. :Joi, ,~,;.'J . hf•..,._. the .,..d~.-•. •.....,.., •~ .. e1114 ,., ~--.-,"" .fl ·~-1• ____ ,_,._ ,_.,___ •--d /'1AA.l'1,I /I .• '); ,.,..,,_ 11-. ✓ J..., u iA. <1 Au.•'•""•.,: •'l'I'-'' ,# .._, ,lJJ./.,'fJ/ I'. /f1//y,1,,. .tL...f, .. .u~ .. ,,..~_1-:.--. .. lt•lltf'~ ............ . , ... ,., •• ~.~ ........ ~ ..... .._.... ... ct ... . , •-wlff9.cl IO .... ..._ ili,,t ,1.,,./-.,,ry aaec-.., , ... ... ~•- w1n.kss ..,.._-.-..... ·-· . ,.'.: :_~b:.:t.· /.1 -6-~ r.'~·::· . /I., cl;-, B t::;,..'": ....... -.. .. ..._,, ........... . ·--·------ :i ~-:r . : .:.C":".'1 '!'! tr. :: ·•_,VJ". I•~ ~, ! :-,t" •. !"''J .. : •C ~: :-: . . .. -::-.·· t· ·· .• ,r •.. \a ti\• ,.,.-:_ ·-~C"":"' • _.'.') J~::-• ... -: : · .... -!r·,•:r: ;.r. •• 1 ~! ! ..... l-•.. ,. ..... -•I .JI' '" :. .... -·-· --------------------------------.c"'--------- --------------•""'-·.-........-----· --------------·-----------.•. I -..... . . . .... - • I I I ....... , ~,., ,,:•• . -:;,:• r-' _;, ••. --... • L, ---···· I . I . . j,... ~ ;, ...! ...... ; \ \ • l l I i I t .. . , . I I ' , \ ·• .... , r .. ~ .~ . .. , ., ~-i. -....... I , ,, /., ,. ..... ~ .. ------,/ PORTION 1.-ANCJ'./O AGUA· H 1EDIOI ..... - " ........ ... I --r ................. -· " .. I ,. I •· '· ,~~3 • ....... , ........ .-411 c--..c .. -. ,,.C-4 "•" ,: ·Pr✓•-~.,_, '* I> r. t, .l:,u. ''1 .... , ....... ·--•hi ................. c.:~-...... ., •••llllt4 lhe, . ,,:; ~---1 ·· ~ ,~-; ...... ...;..~ - -. I ! ~ g ~! tr ,: li. !1 ll ~ ~ ij !,,. . b! ll ... ---------·-· ~n ••••-"• ~nd rlrht or VP.)' f~r r~~d rur~o••• ov~r • r:rh-,,r ~a.n~ i<. f•f"~ \illt'r tn i.,i:; .. •r.-~ .. : .. '"l!' ! U~("h') :.r•tll ?lt!d1,nct:a, lr. th .. C~11r.t)' ~, s .. n :.1rr.n, ;it .. t• ~; ._. •li'••r~111, .;.c-C'!lrdtnl' :.:,.•·•~ ~~fl'J-t'"Of :':ta • .,:,, fl!.,,. ln -.n111· :,£!:"·•· u! ~: • .-: ~-:::•1 ~r:'!'~-! .. !" -., -. • : 1rr·J :•,..u,•y, '.l11VP:":l•r ! ,. 1 : :,'1(, 1 thP ("f'ftU: -l lnl' ~, I"■ ld H• f '>Ot f tr!~ t.•lr.t· :.~• rrntflf' !tu• o: C. trDY~l!P~, hhrd et1:fr.c-.-f! ri:>•d ilr •t,,.-r. =,:i t~,.. :wt~ac:~:~f! ·~·-· •n~tc.:.-.~ ~~nlt tt .. ,. .. , :.nJ dr:-C"r1i••J cl,·: r:,xt-;:.~r!~· -.~ !-.• 'nv•i ;.,tr.:11::r -.: ,::r-:::"::P,_!P .. C'tl~11 ~!' t,u. r•nt•r tlr.,. o! "I ,-1-lr.1: :1•t,?, al!t: l-.. -'!-aw,~ n• .-.,..~.ct .;i•1rw•1 :~,. •:-;, acC",r,!ta, te ::.a:, ~nc,r,·-.! ,n ! ~1• ,~ •.hf' ,.:!~r• .,, t~" ··, ,~~, .,•1rv•Y>T ,f ~ .. lr! : .,,,::~y, 11t·.r:. ~h .. ::utn.-:a,lf'Tt:, ,•ot1:1r.i:-·,t!.,r. 01 th• c:rnt•r :. ln• ,f ~•• \r! tr .. v• l:-" h-•r" t"•Jt ! ••rt',' ,.._,.,. tfllnf. :ir,;r,x\~:at•~Y :nr~n'911r'.• 3t11itlon !-.:: i~l,•• ~•• -:cc1>rCtt1t :., , .. ,~ ::i.• :~ :~~•" l.ar.,•r •:~. t ~=--: ~~ .. nc-• ;:>:Jt~w,crr' 7 :.! ~nr ,,.t,~ ~·r,~.,nr:,,.l,n :·• f.-•r --:.,19,. .,, t'!! t-, ~r.11 J~~.1tr.-.·r••.•rlr T't,ai:~ ,..! ~.,, •tn• nl •••'" l,on~ ~:1rv•y •:,. ~ .•: 1 trlr.r :a,!nt ", '' •• tr,-,1i.·:1 :i:: 1,~.U l~ " .. • :.-:4:.·•r:;rr', -:.'t t~•:ir r.t.:,. ~r·•• -w: !1~t ,, l•rlr.::.tr:, ~r· . tt.• r.rr•t~ r.r:-crllr•. c,•nt~rl!!"',•: :~.•~c:• ~;,1t:~~fll!'!""r!:, ... 1.:r.6! \.!iP cra.~•r ! :.r.• •f r~•1' t-r~.v,•!!••• ~-,;~c', , ...... !•,._ t:.. e►:,u;• ". ·• u., •t.,vr. :-n ,:,: • ·.e~ 9'z!':ll tt .. _., .. : ~r.•nc.- z~-1C'\"-•::trr!)• t;:'1," .i.lJut.t.-rly 1w::.r.r •.ah! ~rr:~•!" ~ h;I" 1t t~e trnvrl.:.Pt! r.,•,e t, •• rOi,t! ~\l!':11:t~ ,n :,c i'·J~!':t ''l .. ••" ,!'l.:,v;. ~n t•lci "xr.t\ t:. ....... , \ Pt:-., •t ,r !1Par tt.r ;;, r~!'lr .. ,'. C'O:-n.-r or tnP ~antt "r"er~•·•C: tr. ~llfo(: ':.:> •••• n ~.lrS:"!11 G••r 6 ! ~•C'•TlC Co:l;•••r.y, r"rl!"t~r•tt :•an• ;.._, :=?!=, .• , .;.:,C"•.1:wr.:. :.:1. t·..,1.1·,·-· ln :n.-c.!! lC'• ~r tt;r t ::,1nt7 ~•c:trtr11r a: .,,u! ::t?•!' S~P .#'•'· :..l•r-:t i.:t11n~y 11:u! l•!n, o ;,tr.i -,nor r.,.,,r • .,. ::~ rtr.,r!y : lr:,. or ••~t :.:a~ ·-;:-... .. n •""":.,~nt r,:il! rlrt.t o! v,., Cor r~ ,r. ;,urJ,:o~•, i,v.,r • rtr t ., u: !~nr: 5v ! ..,, L 111 h:1: ::, :.:,t "'! •• -=! !".li!r.C'fit\ .--:iua • t;,~iond .. , tn ttie ·. !l":!:ty ~r 3,..:. L\c10, S•a.~• .,r ·c.1lf2rnt11, &c~c,:c!~r.r !.0 ·:"'"'· thrr11:,f ~::>. :-=:~, '"~!Ptl in tn~ '1fr!e" :,C :.ht" ~.;, .. ~t;· :~.-::-~r~r:-,! ::.!~ • ""-••••!1, :.ov.-·,t•r ?~. ! .. "l(, ~r.• c+n':•t l ~nt' u! r:, \d ~L f?:.t rt.~1 .. l•tn, th~ C:Pntttr 1 t:•• or :. tr1.vrll.,r. .,.rt!:, nuri! ~,irf•c,.~, r~-~C' ,.~ ~:t~vn on tn,. c.t,a.cfttt~ ~~ .. :, :·,r.t~lt. ";.", a~d ~e,c-rlb•d •~·;r~xlr:h~?•Y ••~ follo"!': --. . ---. --... .-, • ----r l I :..a.. I ., .,i,, ; •·'-" ... ~-I r-,;. . " : ,~ .. I .:..i. .~ :I ··.r q •I -.. I ... .. : '· ... •t : r ~ r.i .; l •.. , .. I r ,. i .. I .... .. . . :. : ~· ~•. t: ' • I. ,,_ . . ..-. .. .---; -. ~ .... :W:t't i iEl}t--2-·2f: ---~~~-~C~f .... ""'!W~,r'! ..... ~;~:~;~J(~:~:~·=r: .. ~~-:'l'•~~-t''!:t;•.!!'.~.l!ll!•· ~•r.:-::::.,~•~l.!5,~a~rr.~• :'"'!:'!•!'.'!'t"·!ll!t:0:5!!~"'."!l!'!!!'!!'ll!r.'lml!P!'llll~----.. ·~"'·"'" ..... "'""'l!l""'",..l!! ... _____ .... 11"!' ...... -- ----- ·• , r M.:.il !Ii li&4 -s::t/:#f 9 - I r I I t ~ i- ·-•·---:·-. •a•• a,•--•••----------- EXBlBIT "D" l!a0:d Un, < c2nttnY1dt f.ho Ar.o• H•dlonda Lot, "I'• & "I• PIii• 2 -~" ,a!"'•~•nt l'lnrl rtrht r,~ ~or tor r:~-.:t ;,ur;,o:,r!' av,r a 1trL;, ..,f !:me! 5( t•"t -..:-:1 .. In ~=•t~ ., " and "T" 11f follnt'ho "'"" !lf'tt1~m!11, Le, tl'l• c,,urit:• of San L,1,.,:o, .;t;1t• c1 t.:,,11rorn1&,, 11c.-,rl!tnr tc-:;1,;, tl'l•r"o~ 110. J:'~, fll•fl ~n tne d f lc:r of tt.• C 01,nty ,, .. eol'cr ot ,,, Ir. ( -,unt1, •·~v .. -:1:'PI' 1:.., 1!:<lf·, •"" e,ontf'r I l,1• uf M !•• 5c, f:,~t !'tr•.~ l1t1nr ~h• <'Pntt>r l Lnr o! r, ~?'l:v•ll .. , r:,n,1 U! !h:tvn t1!l tna r,t:,,ehc-d ~=~:,, ~·rr:lt !t • J\"1 012r d .. Krll-f"d ~?,~"~l~~:•lY ~, f~ll-:1v,: ;•r;lnnln1· :at, ~?~r.t "C.' .. :-.• ~tirt•.rn on !''llci Tx,1lt.lt "',\"; ~h.,neP r•l'tPrly i:.lonr t,,,. c·r:-.ar t\nf r.f :-1,ld :rnv•11~d rt-hr. t~Lr-, i.~;:,r::ixl:,11tely ulonr tll" 1:nrth•:-lr lln• ct . r,.tc! :.:-t ":"; t~•'"""' S!>uth•r!y al:·nr ~hid c,•nt.,r lln• 65C. !~•t tJ i',lr.t '': "i t.t,enc• ;.;c,:~t.n\y 11M ;:ioulll•nHPrly 11lon1 ~c•c! r.entPr ll~~ ftr t, 11 r~•➔ J rnc-tlon llt P~tnt "C" n• /' ,l::i,:n -:r: r·.tc! f xhlh1t ";,"1 t!';PnC."e ".at'.f!rly ,,Ion,: raid ft\• ~rrt•r lln-tJ ?,lnt "~11 e~ ~h~~n on ~x~ltlt ·•~N ~elnc I :, r'j;Hf ~tUtC"tL:;z, a;,;:ro"'l:.ot,-lYria.,!re-t •.:,,,t ~;• th.-"~c. •~r11t1:I,• : ,,,. c,.,r:cctt,1e ~·oltl'. ; r.nd iolnt ~1 ot raid :.ot. "T" :1~ !'t.:ivr c.n :~i•:'" ~·=,. ~;·3. ;,:, • .. ~r.~l'nt -,r:d ,· t,~ht or .ay ror rnoc:! r,ur~o~"~ ,v•r " •a'.· or ,11n~ 5c; r .... t 1dc!• tn :..,! 'T" o! I a:,ct.o i,ru11 n,-<"1,,nc:., ~Ii tn" ··o ,r.ty ~I ~r.r. 1 !•r,, Slate o! ':oll!ornla, •nccot t!lr,r t.L.: :.11,l tn~rrol :;:,. !,;";!~, f C.e-o 1n the .;..(!' le• ul tr.• c-,ur:ty F.f't'<>r,!n M raid C"o11nt7 ~ov.,::l·f!r 16, 1!!"<6, tll~ .c-rnt.,, !1n• c,f r,.lc1 '11: fo:,t ~trl_, t•lr,,· ~-~• r. .. r.t.,r \lne of ·11 tr11 '" • l Ptf rc.:id ,, ~ ~hovn on tn" "t t1,cnetf ::a;, r tt, It 1 t "I.• and c'"rt'rll:'"d .;:;.,r-:::ln•toly 11, !°Ill lov~1 '.•r~nr.lne 11t i•olr:t "C'" ,,, :ho-.-n on t:rh11'1t ";.~; t"-•nc:• '..orth .. ,,.t,.r,y t,n1. :,,rth•rly 1,;,proitl!'l1•t.elY l:'!5~1 f•,.t al:,nr. thr t'PlltPr l ltic--::r ~old trov• led r::,ac: to Po~nt ".!~ 11s •n::,vn :Jn ~alr' : . .c.~i.4\.'.t 11i" .. '. . ... . •• _ ., ,.,., • ;. · ,., .• •• , ... ,..,-~ -~,.-••. ,;!;.-...;! · . 1,"',., .... ~ ..,, • ,.~~f .· '~W(W~~::.~°t~,;;t?.:it)i ¥ . ;+r.ttt-:.fg:(:~·; -·1~-if:.~~J~1.trtr~'.~~~/s1-t ~.;~~,~ ~:k ··?.;·:,41:-1\ · · · ~1~;:iic::Jy~J~ ... :~i.:'.":-;~ ,:;· . :~.:-t-.:½~{} 3ti·f"\.j.;:';i:Jt1~~ ~,:~;;.,. ~~, -~~tJ~:; ,~~►'~;\?'..-.:··=·\. ;,i'-,~ ,;.,, ,,. ~ ~? --...... -· • ._. ___ -------------------·---------------·· .. ----·---.. ;"':• J•.110 1 .. •u11 Heel lon,.11, :Att ., ... ~ ":·· :,:ire J ~n "-~•~•nt an~ rlr,llt or vay r:ir robd pu::,o~er o••r a ~tr t;,· of 1:ind jO ,.,ct vlr!l" ln Lot •'':" or R~nc-ho i.c•,:i lll'dlond .. , l.n the County of Sr.n lil.,r.o, St:tb or i,,tlforn!11, bC'cor~ln,: to '•!a;, Lh..,.,.of f;o. e;-1, :tl.,,1 Ln th" 'J! ! 11:r or th" C ,unty ib,1:ort1 .. r of ~:, ld , o,inty, ::::,v., ,, . .,, \1 , t !!<Jt,, th• ,,.nt•r lln11 or ,.11 !,! ;~-f i;:it ttrh L1:tnr tt,e crnt.:-! l:ic 01 :!oad :,o. 5 (h,;,".'tl"-:') ,r::iwn :in tllP 1ttt.ch•c! ::,.;; !.>:llll t.t ·•••" r.r,c r'trc•r Lt,.,. 1>;,11r:iirhat•ly •• !otlowH · : .,.,1:,:,tnr .-,t ,>:)Int •;·" ::h,wn :,n ~x~lt-!t "ft"': :.hr,,c-~ i.uft<-rly :.i~nr UII! -:n!t l)J'IC-tlca.l r0ut,. a.,,.r·,wl-::i:r~y l~\J;., r.-•: T.:" :")!:n. 0 i111 ft!' th:,1,tn :,:, ,11~d F:xr.:tt .... ,..,. ~ ·~!l'!'~nt 11:,d rt,rtat ,r w:iv r~r ro~d :·,LJJ'p:,, .. , ~Vf'r n tt.rt; JI :-n~ 5:, !•••t -.,~._·,. lJ, :..::>ttr ·•: •• .nrl .. :" :,f :l~n(ft:, ~rut !!PCt0ni!:., in :.h~ Cnunty ~r ~-n r : .. , .... , , .... ~ .. t~ ~: ::,.;~1:.:i.:1,:~., iu:c.:ur;H:1r. ;:, .a: t:--..... rc;..!' :;~. ~~~, r:~,~ Int~ .. ::irr:c,· .. rt~" c::.n:y il--C'0rd~r -.,r ,fttr! .; . .;,:ity, :;ov .. :~te-r 1',, : :!')6, L~r C'rnt<'r 1 Ir.• :,C ~:i le' ;;. ~: ,t t~r1;, t.~1,1.-~r• c:r•nll':' 11:-,r c•!" ,,,.Oi,IDf'e-,1 ;;o•c: :.~. <, :-t;:n,r. :n th~ t.ttuet.•d :~;.,, c.x.ntt lt ''.'." .11~ d..,!'crltet" "-Ji•r:ni:.:.•.•t.,ly ~, !ol1~wr: · !·•ttnnlnr llt iJOlnt. •••·" rt~ !"t':-,·aiJ .Jft '"ft' rx!':lt :•. '"11"•: th~nrr Z~uth••?§l'r!y Al,nr ~~,. ~0~t .r~rttrnl r~J:,, 11:,~rj,rl,;:,t,.!y l:.'.\.\J ftt~t; lh•nrfo C:,utr1•·rrt•rly r,t::,::,- lhP ~o~t ;r,zrtlcAl r~utr 1 ~~~r~~1~atttly 7~.L fr,t; t/l<1nC'., ·..-.,n~r11 ,.,,~:oxt·.at,ly ; ·,::. f•H t~ 11 .·:,Int ·,:1 1~·1 ~ n• :· r t.t.,. <' =~:-.or. l o 1J:1dn r l' I ~, "."("f-lr, ~a ! ,~ :.~tr ": " :lr.:! '!''; ::."nee .:a:>uth•r:y q,lor., :::-t,;J:~~1 .... \lit~ .-:air. ('"~;~-:~n l::11111r1:iry :,r;;:-u1:t~c.:t!ly !!t:Ci ftr!"t; tr.enc-~ 3c..,.:.hi.·,.1·t•:1 r, al:11 . .: tt.(! :'i::!t ~,ra~ttetil r~u:r :..pt,r:Jx!~:ltl"lY !:..::. r• ,:. t~ t':J!t:: "::•• .:: ,;i~vn :>n r:ih~ ~x:-.!:,.tt 0 u·•. "" M4R ,,,. ,,.~ • · •~o4 55:15R 9 ' \ 1:.im-------------·-· ·----------------------------------- . - TRAFFIC ACCESS REPORT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT BIORESOURCES SURVEY REPORT KIRGIS PROPERTY CARLSBAD -~P.ared f o_r lA..r •.. Hot-1ard. __ !{~rg_is 8332 Pinotage Court San Jose, CA 95135 Prepared by NEW HORIZONS Planning Consultants, Inc. 1850 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 May 1984 \.,a:.i\s~~ Ky:. FEB 2 31907 lECttit\Ct\. SERVICES DEPI. - w °' ) /\1.Tl'.l!W',TIVi: I\ AI.Tl:IHIATIVF. R 1\1.TERtll\TIVE C /\1,1'1·:RHI\TI VF: D Difficulty of l\c:-quiri.ng Riqht-of-Way l'ln eY.i!;l:ing eas<?ment -need to acquire r i •Jht-of -\-.ay fJq e ~: i st i ng casC?ment beyond the Kelly Ranch property. Would need to acquire 3000 feet of riqht-of-way Need to relocate easement through Park Wou ltl neetl to rnlociltc casement throucJh l'.irl: ) cor-ll•J\IH.SOH 01' l\l,Tl-:UN/\1'JVl~S Impact on I.ands Over __ 2s, 5lo(!l' ____ _ Impact on Biological Open Space Easement Would traverse Would cross proposed geologically open space easement unst;ible land - probably not feasible -major stabilization on sensitive topography Substantial impact on areas over 251 slope Large portion of off-site connector would be on slopes over 25 percent Least impact on slopes over 251 Would cross proposed biological open space easement No impact on open space easement No impact on open space easement [,and Use Compati- bility \'iould join residential uses -may be private, limited en·t ry community Would access through similar residentially designated property Would exit through primitive park and Distance to Planne~ or Proposed Roadway ) Would adjoin f.elly Ranch development - however, this is last phase of the project and is not planned for 5-10 years 3000 feet -anti no proposed development along this route Approximately 1000 feet eithP.r water reclamation plant or industrial park• site Roadway would adjoin intensive park development, C"onfcrcnce center, hotal Proposed loop Park road would nearly adjoin Kirgis property on west ,:;~f New Horizons Planning Consultants Inc. ·•;.~ ... ---- KELLY RANCH ... ' ' ALT.' A \ I I I I ' I I I ALT.,'B I I I I I FUTURE RESIDENTIAL \ I I I 1-------.. I I ~igure 13 FUTURE MACARIO PARK LOOP / / -• , I -I I TO.RE l ALT.1 C FARADAY HU!~TINGTON PALOMAR FUTURE CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER (KOLL CO.) PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE ACCESS ROADS A,B,C AND D· 24 - plans for the properties surrounding the Kirgis property have not addressed these easecents nor provided any proposed alternative access locations. Thus, this study has analyzed possible alternative routes which might access the Kirgis property, and which would be most compatible with proposed surrounding long-range development plans. The opportunities and constraints of each route have been addressed. While no engineering is included in the socpe of this study, topographic maps and a slope analysi~ were utilized to determine practical routes. Surrounding land use development and long-range planning co~siderations were major determinants in assessing viability of the alternatives. All major alternatives are discussed and the feasibility of each is addressed. B. Alternative Access Routes l. Alternative A -Northern Access: Across Knoll, Kelly Ranch to Cannon Road A proposed alternative would exit the Kirgis property across the northern knoll of the proper~y, joining the most southeasterly extension of the proposed Kelly Ranch devel~pment area (Figure 13 ). There is no present easement along this access. Development of this access would necessitate the stabilization of a narrow eroding rifge which is presently less than fiftee~ feet wide. Conversation with Geologist Ji!"'. :-::~owl ton of Owens Geotec!mical, as well as field visits by NEW HORIZONS staff reveal that a massive cut and fill of this badlands type topography and/or the driving of deep pilings would be requir:d to saf~ly stabilize an access road across this ridge. As canyons on both sides of ~his ridge are fairly steep and eut and fill slopes would need to be at a 2 to 1 ratio, a graded slope of 100 vertical feet could be expected for a small paved access road. Such a slope ~ight not be acceptable to the City of Carlsbad or the Coastal Commission who would be concerned with potential lagoon siltation and visual impacts. Additionally, a spokesperson for the Kelly Ranch development has indicated that the community planned on the ridgetop is _presently envisioned as a private, guarded entry subdivision, that the streets in this area may not be dedicated public streets, and that the circulation would not be compatible with entry from the Kirgis property. Development of this phase of the Master Plan is estimated et 7-10 years in the future. Additionally, a recent proposal by the developers of Kelly Ranch has suggested construction of a reservoir for the Costa Real Municipal Water District en ~he knoll top adjoining the Kirgis ~roper~y. Placement of the reservoir in this location would effectively eliminate this access from consideration, as there would not be sufficient width to accommodate the required right-of-way. Presently, th7 Costa Real Master Plan calls for placement of the reservoir at a higher elevation, with minimum floor elevation of 349 feet, and places it further north on the Kelly Ranch property. An additional constraint associated with this alternative is that revelopment of this access would impact the proposed biological open space easement at the north of the Kirgis property. 2. Alternative B -Northern Access; to El Camino Real An existing easement (Easement #4) appears to run north of the Kirgis property and across the southeast corner of the Kelly Ranch property (Figure 14}. The constraints associated with this alternative include the necessity for extensive grading across steep terrain with slopes in excess of 25 percent. The northern portion of this route would need to cross the area proposed as biological open space. 29 SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGlNEER1N,;/GEOlOGY 9606 TIEQAA GQANDE SUITE 107 SANOIEGC CALIFORNIA 92120 (619) 095-3150 Kaufman and Broad c/o Cal Communities 18002. Sky Park Circle Irvine, California 92714 Attention: Mr. Wayne Callaghan July·24, l984 Project No. 269.3.l Subject: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PARCEL "Y" ACCESS 400-ACRE KELLY RANCH Reference: Gentlemen: CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, 400- Acre Kelly Property, Carlsbad, California", by American Geotechnical, dated July 29, 1983. We are pleased to present the results of our geotechnical evaluation of the proposed 60-foot public access road from the Kelly Ranch area II z" to adjoining Parcel 11 Y11 in the southeast corner of the property. The purpose of our evaluation was to provide preliminary engineering, geologic, and soils engineer- ing input regarding the feasibility of the proposed road placement. For our evaluation, we have utilized a 200-scale topographic map showing the proposed grading of Area "z". Our evaluation was directed to this plan and also serves as a base for Figure 1, which accompanies this report. SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed access road to Area "Y" is located in the extreme southeast corner of the 400 + acre Kelly Ranch (Figure l). The proposed access would cross an approximately 60-foot wide, and in some areas less than 60-foot wide, ridge which acts as a sort of "land bridge" between adjoining ridges. The narrow- est portion of the "land bridge" is approximately 150 feet in length. Very steep, near vertical bluffs are present on the east and west side of this portion of the proposed access road. These blu£fs transition to relatively deep canyon areas. Kaufman and Broad c/o Cal Communities Project No. 269.3.1 July 24, 1984 Page 2 PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS The Preliminary Geo technical Report (see Reference) has recommended a 60-foot setback from the top of the slope in natural areas, which would essentially eliminate any con- struction in the area of the proposed access road. CONCLUSIONS We ha,,e reviewed the proposed access route and the previous reports and recommendations regarding this area. Ba~ed upon- our review, we have concluded that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the proposed 60-foot access is only feasible if extensive grading .is performed to achieve appropriate slope stability safety factors. Structural setbacks, as proposed by the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, and supported by this firm, would eliminate any stable-area in the narrow "land bridge" or to cut the ridge down to create large level areas. ~he only way to create a useable and stable 60-foot road area would be to grade and build additional level areas on either siee of the "land bridge". This could only be accomplished by e):tensive grading and remedial work due to the possible instability of the bed::-o~k materials. We would• recommend an alte=nate use for the n1and bridge" area and southerly portion of Area _"Z 11 which would not create a public thoroughfare. If you h~ve any questio~s, please call. Very t=uly yours , j::T✓U JAMES F. I<NOh7LTON, CEG 1045 Principal Geologist JFK/MRO:tap Enclosures MARTIN R. OWEN, RCE 23155 Principal Engineer _. Copies: (2} ;~ddressee ( 1) !(autman a:id Broad, Attn: Mr. Robert Galloway· CN,i.N1G-OrBCH~ ,, ...... /\. • , --1"-!l , -i --,.'-"'., ~ NORTH APPRO)tU!.ATE SCALE 1•= 200• GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Or PARCEL "Y" ACCESS W:t4G~OECHNICAL / Pl?OJECT NO. 269.3.1 I FIGURE NO. 1 . APPENDIX B City Letter On Buildout PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 20, 1987 Mr. Douglas P. Boyd Principal Turrini and Brink Citp of Carlsbab 1920 E. 17th Street, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92701-6699 Dear Mr. Boyd: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 The purpose of this letter is to respond to your buildout projections for Zone 8. Staff has revlewed all of the information that you have provided and would like to thank Steve Flint for his assistance with these projections. We have reviewed the various scenarios which were presented and believe the most rational approach would be to allow Zone 8 to recoup those dwelling units lost as a result of acreage reductions in villages A, C, and O. Multiplying these acreages at the growth control point for each specific land use results in the addition of 141.S units to the zone. Depending on whether or not the power line easement is relocated will determine the actual dwelling unit number approved for Zone 8. With the lines relocated, the numbers are as follows: Total Kelly Kirgis 1 , 214 1 1 1,225 With the lines not relocated, the numbers are as follows: Total Kelly Kirgis 1 , 1 87 1 1 1,197 Douglas P. Boyd January 20, 1987 Page Two As we indicated, the sole purpose of this letter is to respond to your buildout projections and the dwelling units allowed under each scenario. These dwelling unit numbers are in no way guaranteed. When future development plans are submitted, they will be reviewed to determine the actual number of dwelling units which may be allowed within that specific development area. The development proposal will be reviewed based on typical criteria such as environmental constraints, principles of good design, sensitive site planning, etc. Again, the dwelling units listed above are being agreed upon for buildout projections of the zone and are based on the information which has been presented and reviewed at this time. We appreciated your assistance in this process and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call your zone plan coordinator, Nancy Rollman, at 438-1161. Sincerely, Philip o. Carter Senior Management Analyst c: Michael Holzmiller Gary Wayne POC:dm APPENDIX C Park & Recreation Commission-Agenda Bill 488-5 L --- . ) ) ) .. z 0 -1-u < z 0 -en en -:i :i 0 u PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION -ACENDA BILL AB# 488-5 MTG. 4/18/88 DEPT. P & 1t TITLE; ~ vt ~ APPROVAL 0!' RBQUZST FOR PROPOSAL TO REVISB THB MACARIO CANYON MASTBR PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission approve the Request for Proposal to revise the existing Macario Canyon Park Master Plan. ITEM EXPLANATION DEPT. HD._ CITYAlTY- CITYMGR._ In December of 1981 the City Council adopted Resolution 6786 approving the development plan for ~cario Canyon Park as prepared by Iwanaga and Associates. In addition to a phased recreational amenity development plan, the study outlined a funding concept utilizing both public funds and private investments to develop and maintain Hacario Park. Due te the lack of improved public access into Hacario Canyon and Councils direction to concentrate on the development of community parks, the Iwanaga Plan has yet to be implemented. Park Maintenance staff and community volunteers have, however, been involved in tree planting projects and irrigation installation. Currently an agricultural lease for approximately 70 acres of Hacario Canyon provides annual revenue of approximately S20,000 to the general fund. City Council approved a golf course feasibility study for Hacario Canyon in March 1987. Upon acceptance of the report, council di:ected staff to consider the study findings in a revised master development plan for !iacario Canyon. In July 1987 council approved a funding mechanism in the PFF to insure funds become available in the future for the development of ~cario Park. Development funds are currently identified in the CIP budget for 1997+. Based on the revised financing plan and ehe need to re- assess contemporary recreational trends within the community, staff has prepared an RFP to update and revise the existing Master Plan. The attached RFP outlines a scope of work to provide (3) three alternative development plans which will consider the existing master plan while incorporating current and future recreational trends, financing methods, opportunities and/or constraints. PLAN A - PLAN B - includes an 18 hole championship golf course complex in conjunction with opportunities for additional recreational aaenities. · includes an 18 hole executive golf course complex in conjunction with opportunities for additional recreational amenities over and above Plan A. PLAN C -will provide recreational amenities and exclude any golf course development. J \ Page 2 of AB# 488-5 If the Commission concurs with the proposed RFP, staff anticipates the study completion within 180 days of consultant selection (December 1988). FISCAL IMPACT A master plan revision for Macario Canyon is anticipated to cost between $30,000 -$45,000. Sufficient funds have been budgeted and are available in account '~320-820-1820-3107. EXHIBITS l, RFP Macario Canyon Park Master Plan Revision 2. Consultant Agreement 7J \ __) --· ) _J SUBJECT: RBQUES'l' FOR PROPOSAL (R!'P) MACARIO CANYON PARK MASTBR PLAN REVISION A. PURPOSB l. The City of Carlsbad is soliciting proposals for a Master Plan revision to identify the most realistic recreational land use based on future recreational needs and trends for approximately 400 acres of land located in the center of the city. B. STUDY ARBA The subject study area is located southeast of the Agua ·• Hedionda Lagoon, between 1-s and El Camino Real. The study area is comprised of three parcels: 288 92 32 412 Acres City owned Macario canyon Park Acres Leased land from SDG&E (HUB) SOG&E owned property (HUB) TO'l'AL ACRBS C. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is undeveloped with gentle to steep slopes ranging from sea level to approximately 235 feet. D. GENERAL INJ'ORMATION 1. consultant firms should submit a lump sum price and indicate the corresponding scope of work to be performed for said price. The city will make its selection on the basis of qualifications and work proposed, not necessarily on price. 2. The selected firm will be asked to sign the standard city consultant agreement (attached). Please review prior to submitting a proposal. EXHIBIT 1 1 ' _) \ E. 3. Proposal must be submitted and received no later than at 5:00 p.m. in order to be considered. Proposals are to be submitted: City of Carlsbad c/o Purchasing Dept. 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, CA. 92008 4. It should be noted the submitted proposal does not commit the City to award a contract or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal in response to this request. The city reserves the right to accept and reject any or all proposals, and reserves the right to negotiate with any qualified applicant. QUALIFICATIONS Please submit with your proposal a brief description of the firm's qualifications. standard Form 254 may be submitted for this purpose; special qualifications related to this particular project should be noted. The individual qualifications of the persons actually carrying out the project should also be listed. The consultant shall provide ? ~.,.. (..~~.,.. a list of five former or current clients (with addresses and phone numbers) for whom the consultant has performed work · similar to that described in this-request. F. AU'l"HOIUZATION The proposal and bid shall be signed by an authorized official and shall contain a statement to the effect that the proposal is a firm offer for at least a ninety day period. 2 ) G. H. ) CRITERIA FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SBLBCTION Proposals shall be based on staff's evaluation and analysis. Primary regard will be given to the technical competence and creative ability of the consultant as demonstrated in the proposal. The proposal should include a work plan and timetable. The evaluation will consider the experience of the firm and its staff, proposed completion schedule, availability to work with city staff, and references provided. Final consultant selection will be made by the City council. It is anticipated that a selection will be made and a contract prepared within four to six weeks .• following approval by the City council. REl'BRBNCB DOCUMBNTS/AGZNCIBS 1. DOCUMENTS o Carlsbad General Plan 0 0 Carlsbad Local coastal Program Agua Hedionda Local coastal Plan o Parks and Recreation Element o Macario EIR and Development Plan o citywide Growth Manage~ent Program o Landscape GUideline Manual o current capital Improvement Program o Macario Golf study o Hillside ordinance o zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan 2. AGENCIES o coastal Commission o Department of Fish and Game . o san Diego Gas and Electric o city of Carlsbad 3 2-4 ) The above documents and agencies establish constraints and opportunities that must be considered. Issues of concern are, the wetlands , Lagoon, riparian areas, utW.ty easements, grading limitations, agriculture land, soils, slopes, hydrology, drainage, roads, historical, wildlife, vegetation, recreational concepts, public demand/desires, General Plan consistency requirements, construction and operation cost, archeology, geological, seismic, access and effluent water availability. I. DESIGN PROCESS · l. The intent of the study is to re-evaluate the existing 1982 Master Plan and E. I. R. documents; take into consideration new public demands, desires, and future trends propose a realistic phased land use and development plan. Consideration should be given to the existing inventory, site constraints, geology, soils, hydrology, wildlife, vegetation, archeology, airport . ) noise, wind, utilities, access and other pertinent site characteristics. 2. The City is interested in re-evaluating a quasi- City /Privatization development/operation concept. 3. Infrastructure as outlined the 1981 Macario Master Plan that requires re-analysis: o Athletic Center (PR)* o Multi-Use Playfields (PU)* 0 Art1sans Village {PU) 0 Interpretive Center (PU/PR) 0 Restaurant/Conference Center (PR) 0 Restaurant (PR) 0 Botanical Garden (PU/PR) 0 Park Service Yard (PU) . 4 ) 0 0 0 commercial Convenience center (PR) Group Picnic Areas (PU) Hike-In Picnic/Scout camp (PU/PR) o Public Boat Launch and Rental (PR) o Circulation Systems (PU) Roads and Parking Trails -passive/active pedestrian equestrian and bicycle *(PR= private PU= public) 4~ ~ concepts and public desires the consultant will be asked to evaluate and or plan are: o Championship 18 hole golf course complex o Executive 18 hole golf course complex o Additional lighted multi-use athletic fields that include adult size soccer fields. 0 Amphitheater/Culture Arts facility o Indoor soccer facility o An expanded Athletic Center that would include: Community center/gymnasium Office space for athletic use conference Rooms -Weight room facility Training physical therapy facility 16 court lighted tennis complex Handball racquetball courts Swim complex Outdoor lighted basketball sand lighted volleyball courts Lighted multi-use athletic fields Police firing range 5 J. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. The consultant is to prepare a report and submit colored schematic Master Plan Alternatives outlining three (3) land use proposals PLAN A -will include an 18 hole championship golf course complex in addition to the proposed recreational amenities. PLAN B -will include an 18 hole executive golf course complex in addition to the proposed recreational amenities. PLAN c -will include all the proposed recreational amenities outlining a realistic phased development plan. (excluding golf courses). K. ISSUES Access cannon Road Zone 5 (Industrial) Recreation Plan Faraday Road Alignment Environmental General Plan Zoning Utilities Reclaimed Water Local Coastal Plan Maint/Operation cost Boat Launching Facility Hillside Grading Ordinance Economic Issues 6 Growth Management Plan P & R Element Various State Agencies Economics SDG&E Financing Development Cost Amenity Space Availability Agua Hedionda Lagoon Lagoon Depth -- I J L. -- - WORK TO BB PERFORMED BY THI: CONStJLTAll'l' 1. Prepare three (3) alternative plans including colored schematic Master Plans as outlined in section J-1. ·• The consultant is to analyze the existing Macario 1981 Master Plan, and the Macario Golf cour~e study completed in 1986 review and propose the best possible recreational land use taking into consideration, constraints, opportunities suggested amenities, present and future recreational trends, and the potential for private participation. 2. The Golf course Complex should include a club house/restaurant, maintenance equipment storage facility, cart storage area, snack bar, rest rooms, driving range, putting greens and/or chipping area. The golf course part of the study is also to include the following: o Development cost for each type of course layout o Maintenance and operation impacts/cost projection o Green fee recommendation with projected increases for a s-10-1s year period o Revenue projection from course operation for a s-10-1s year period o Alternative development proposals o A cash flow requirement in order to implement a golf course in the Hacario development plan. o Analysis of a city operation or contracting out for course maintenance, club house operation and golf professional services 0 Analyze the use of reclaimed water and recommend an application plan in the landscaping of the golf course and park area including the greens 7 ... '21. _) H. 3. In evaluating the golf proposals, consideration is to be given to the location or re-location of existing planned or proposed recreational amenities. Environmental sensitive areas, road alignments, utility towers/lines and the south shore of the HUB leased park, should all be taken in consideration. 4. Each of the three (3) plans is to have a development cost estimate, phasing schedule related to the existing city financing mechanism, maintenance and operation impacts and a realistic evaluation of the proposed public/private concept as outlined in the 1982 Macario Development Plan. 5. Consideration is to be given to regulatory Federal, State or Local Laws, current zoning and General Plan requirements, engineering, grading or planning concerns and careful analysis of the Parks and Recreation Element, Zone 5 Industrial Recreation Mitigation Plan and the Growth Management Program. 6. The existing EIR document should be reviewed to determine if further environmental analysis is required. FINAL PRODUCT 1. The consultants final product will be a detailed written report that will include colored schematic master plans comparing the advantages or disadvantages of each proposal. 8 ) P. 2. 3. 4. .. The report is to contain all pertinent information, assumptions, methodology etc., so that a recommendation can be made on the best possible use of the subject study area. The reports shall contain an executive summary suitable for presentation to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. The consultant is to provide 30 copies of the report and suitable copies of the colored schematic Master P 1 an . + ~ 'h-i 1 \ ~ 1 ~ v,,-,. f? :r ~ u-...c.. N. MEETXNG AND PRESENTATIONS The consultant should plan to meet with various staff members and public groups throughout the study period. Additionally, plans should include making two presentations each to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. 0. WORK TO BB PERFORMED BY THB CITY Parks and Recreation staff will be available for questions and provide the necessary documents, maps and study's when requested by the consultant. PROPOSED ·PAYMEHT OP FEE FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES 1. Notice to Proceed 2. Preliminary Report Phase 3. Final Report Phase 4. Acceptance by City Council ~ OF PAYMENT 10 2S 40 25 TOTAL: 100 g ) Q. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHBDULB DATB .,, 1. Request for Proposal Solicited May 9 2. Deadline for Receipt of Proposal June 3 3 • Park and Recreation commission Recommendation June 20 4. City council Action July 5 5. Preliminary Report Sept 9 6 • Parks and Recreation Commission Review of Final Report Nov 21 7 • City council Dec 13 10 S.D.G E. 40 a r s -.,.._ S.D.G E. ] ./2 ~ . . _.,."\-TOT AL STUDY AREA Ap. -~--~·--. .,-~ .~~~h~ *KB.1.Y PROPERTY ~-~. ~ ', 50 acres -~~--~. * HUB PARK -: -.-. ./' ' -~:---- 92 acres City of Carlsbad ------~ (leased from S.D.G.& • * S.D.G.&E. 32 acres __ _.., MACARIO CANYON '--~~5":llli---288 acres S.D.G.&E. Koll Company -~ ~ ·.") ~:~~-.\ _) AGREEMENT FOR THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day , 1988, by and between CITY OF CARLSBAD, a -------of municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and _________________________ , hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". RECITALS City requires the services of to provide the necessary architectural/planning • services for preparation of a revised development Master Plan for Macario canyon Park; and consultant possesses the necessary skills and qualifications to provide the services required by City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows: (1) CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS 3/88 1 EXHIBIT 2 ) ( 2) ( 3) CITY'S OBLIGATIONS The City_ shall PROGRESS AND COMPLETION The work under this contract will begin within ten (10) days af.ter receipt of notif°ication to proceed by the City and be completed within 90 days of that date. Extensions of time may be granted if requested by the consultant and agreed to in writing by the City. In consideration of such requests, the City will give allowance for documented and substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of foresight on the part of the consultant, or delays caused by City inaction or other agencies• lack of timely action. (4) FEES TO BE PAID TO CONSULTANT The lump sum fee payable according to paragraph(~) shall be S ----No other compensation f_or services will be allowed except those items covered by supplemental agreements per paragraph (7), Changes in Work • . (S) PAYMENT OF FEES Payment of fees shall be made upon satisfactory completion of the various phases as outlined in the "R.F.P." section P (payment of Fee For consultant service). 2 ) lO/ .:.:r1A.NGt..:S .. N WUitK If, in the course of this contract and design, changes seem merited by the consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change in the conditions of the contract is warran~ed, the Consultant or the City may request a change in contract. such changes shall be processed by the City in the following manner: A letter outlining the required changes shall be forwarded to the City or consultant to inform them of the proposed changes along with a statement of estimated changes in charges or time schedule. After reaching mutual agreement on the proposal, a supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved by the City council. such supplemental agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of the agreement. Changes requiring immediate action by the consultant or City shall be ordered by the Parks and Recreation Director who will inform a principal of the consultant's firm of the necessity of such action and follow up with a supplemental agreement covering such work. (7) DESIGN STANDARDS The consultant shall prepare the Master Plan in accordance with the design standards of the City of Carlsbad and recognized current design practices. Applicable City of Carlsbad standards and regional standards shall be used where appropriate. Copies of such standards shall be obtained from the City of Carlsbad. 3 J ( 8 ) COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The conaultant warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee workinq for the consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making this agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or co.nsideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. ( 9 ) NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE The consultant shall comply with applicable State and Federal -laws regarding non-discrimination. { 10) TERMINATION OF CONTRACT In the event of the Consultant' ·s failure to prosecute, deliver or perform the work as provided for in this contract, the City may terminate this contract for non-performance by notifying the consultant by certified mail of the termination of the contract. The Consultant, thereupon, has five working days to deliver said documents owned by the City and all work in progress. The Parks and Recreation Director shall make a determination of fact based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentage of work which the consultant has performed 4 which is usable and of worth to the City in having the contract completed. BaJed upon that finding as reported to the City council, the council shall determine the final payment of the contract. (11) DISPUTES If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work under this agreement, the following procedure shall be used to resolve any questions of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agreement between parties. such questions, if they become identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating under the provisions of this contract, shall be reduced to writing by the principal of the consultant or the Parks and Recreation Director. A copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both parties involved along with recommended methods of resolution which would be of benefit to both parties. The Parks and Recreation Director or principal receiving the letter shall reply to the letter along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) days. If the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the dispute shall be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the office of the City Manager. The City council may then opt to consider the directed solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City Council shall be binding upon the parties involved, although nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to them at law. 5 42 (12) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONSULTANT The Consµltant is hired to render professional services of preparing a study and master plans for Hacario canyon Park and any payments made to consultant are compensation solely for such services. Consultant shall certify as the correctness of all designs and sign all plans, specifications and estimates furnished with Registered Civil Engineer's number or Landscape Architect's registration number where necessary. (13) SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of such suspension or termination, upon request of the City, the Consultant shall assemble the work product and put same in order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to City. In the event of termination, the consultant shall be paid for work performed to the termination date; however, the total shall not exceed the guaranteed total maximum. The City shall make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the compensation to be made. Compensation is to be made in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations. (14) STATUS OF THE CONSULTANT The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in Consultant's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of consultant's independent calling, and not as an employee of the City. consultant shall be under control ·of the City only as to the result to be accomplished and the personnel assigned to the project, but shall consult with the City as provided for in the request for proposal. 6 ) The Consultant is an independent contractor of the City. The payment m•de to the Consultant pursuant to this contract shall be the full and complete compensation to which the consultant is entitled pursuant this contract. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of the consultant. The City shall not be required to pay any workers' compensation insurance on behalf of the Consultant. The consultant agrees to indemnify the City for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, workers' compensation payment which the City may be required to make on behalf of Consultant or any employee of Consultant for work done under this agreement. The Consultant shall be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and control Act of 1986 (8 use Sec. 1101 - 1S25) and shall comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, sub-contractors and consultants that are included in this agrement. (15) CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications to conform to all applicable requirements of law: Federal, State and local. consultant shall provide all necessary supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose approval is necessary. The City will provide copies of the approved plans to any other agencies. 7 -(16} OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All plan~, studies, sketches, drawings, reports and specifications as herein required are the property of the City, whether the work for which they are made be executed or not. In the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans, specifications, drawings, reports and studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. consultant shall have the right to make one copy of the plans for his/her records. (17) HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The City, its agents, officers and employees shall not be liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines or any damage to goods, properties or effects of any person whatever, nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, or claimed to have been caused by, or resulting from, any act or omission of consultant or Consultant's agents, employees or representatives. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and save free and harmless the City and its authorized agents, officers, and employees against any of the foregoing liabilities or claims of any kind and any cost and expense that is incurred by the City on account of any of the foregoing liabilities, including liabilities or claims by reason of alleged defects in any plans and specifications, unless the liability or claim is due, or arises out of, solely to the City's negligence. (18) ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT The Consultant shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies due thereunder without the prior written consent of the City. 8 ; ) (19) SUB-CONTRACTING If the Consultant shall sub-contract any of the work to be performed under this contract by the Consultant, Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of consultant's sub-contractor, as Consultant is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by consultant. Nothing contained in this· contract shall create any contractual relationship between any sub-contractor of Consultant and the City. The consultant shall bind every sub-contractor and every sub-contractor of a sub-contractor by the terms of this contract . applicable to consultant's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the sub-contract in question approved in writing by the City. (20) PROHIBITED INTEREST No official of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving of any architectural, ·engineering inspection, construction or material supply contractor, or any sub-contractor in connection with the construction of the project, shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. No officer, employee, architect, attorney, engineer or inspector of or for the City who is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the City to exercise any executive, supervisory, or other similar functions in connection with the performance of this contract shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part thereof. 9 .- ) - ) (21) VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION No verba~ agreement or conversation with any officer, agent or employee of the City, either before, during or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained nor such verbal agreement or conversation entitle the consultant to any additional payment whatsoever .. under the terms of this contract. (22) SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS Subject to the provisions of paragraph (18), Hold Harmless Agreement, all terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall insure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and each of . their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. (23) EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall be effective on and from the day and year first above written. (24) CONFLICT or INTEREST The Consultant shall file a conflict of interest statement with the City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad. The consultant shall report investments or interests in real property. 10 ) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF CARLSBAD BY,,__ _______________ _ City Manaqer Title ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk Assistant City Manager 11 - APPENDIX D Estimated. Drainage Costs Pipe Flow Calculations ESTIMATED DRAINAGE COST BY PLANNING AREAS KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST A 54" RCP 320' 150 $ 48,000 36" RCP 150' 100 15,000 Cleanout 1 3,000 3,000 Desilting Basins 2 40,000 80,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $146,000 B (Wetlands Area) C (Existing Desiltation Basin) D (Omitted Planning Area) E 18" RCP 300' 50 $ 15,000 24" RCP 380' 60 22,800 30' RCP 1,200' 80 96,000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 8 3,000 24,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $157,800 F (Existing Desiltation Basin) G 18" RCP 275' 50 $ 13,750 24 11 RCP 320' 60 19,200 Cleanout or Catchbasin 3 3,000 9,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 41,950 H 1811 RCP 360' 50 $ 18,000 24" RCP 565' 60 33,900 Cleanout or Catchbasin 6 3,000 18,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 69,900 (l)Based on City of San Diego Unit Prices -- KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST I 36" RCP 500' 100 s 50.000 30" RCP 280' 80 22.400 18" RCP 180' 50 9-. 000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 9' 3.000 27,000 ========= SUBTOTAL $108,400 j 1811 RCP 260' 50 $ 13.000 30" RCP 580' 80 46.400 Cleanout or Catchbasin 7 3.000 21.000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 80,400 K 1811 RCP 430' 50 $ 21,500 Cleanout or Catchbasin . 2 3.000 6.000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 27,500 -- L 18" RCP 100' 50 $ 5.ooo Cleanout or Catchbasin 1 3,000 3,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 8,000 M 1011 RCP 300' 50 $15,000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 2 3,000 6,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 21,000 N 18" RCP 430' 50 $ 21.500 Cleanout or Catchbasin 2 3.000 6,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 27,500 0 1811 RCP 880' 50 s 44,000 3011 RCP 80' 90 6,400 Cleanout or Catchbasin 5 3,000 15,000 ------=-SUBTOTAL $ 65,400 - ,- PIPE FLOW CALCULATIONS w w C C 0 0 z ..J w >-z <-== a. t: ~ ... "' 0 0 0 :E <C z I.I. ..J ..J w <C < w wO I.I. -"' N a. -z w a: ::- ..J "' :E -en <C "' ... w3= ::, a: "' c( u. ::, 'lP, w 0 u. a: ... z a:o ... g ::E -w8 "' 0 ..J a. a. 3: ~ I.I. 0 z ii: e:: ::> 0 ... :E a. C A Al A2' 12. l 12. 1 2.2 l 811 15.6 A2 AJ 22.3 34.4 0.7 30" 34.4 A3 A 30.9 65.3 0.8 42" 90.0 A Aout 65.3 0.6 42 11 77.9 B Bl B2 14.6 14.6 10.2 18" 33.6 82 84 8.9 23.5 8.5 24" 65.9 83 84 11.0 11.0 1.5 30" 50.2 84 B 0.3 34.8 2.0 42" 142. 3 B5 B 21.2 21.2 5.2 24" 51.6 B Bout 56.0 1.95 30 11 57~3 C Cl CZ 19.0 19.0 5.2 l 811 24.0 C2 C4 0 19.0 2.0 30" 58.0 C3 C4 20.3 20.3 1.0 24 11 22.6 C4 Cl 17 .6 56.9 11. 7 30" 140.3 cs C6 9.4 9.4 6.6 18" 27.0 C6 Cl l 5.4 24.8 0.54 30 11 30. l Cl ca 3.0 84.7 3.6 36" 126.6 CB C 18.0 18.0 14.3 l 811 39.8 C Cbasfo 3.6 106.3 7. 1 36" 177 .8 Cbasin Cout 9.0 115.3 o. 31 48" 80.0* *The 48" RCP that is the last page of Run "C" will go under pressure at the 100-year storm. The friction slope is 0.64% for 110' this gives a friction head loss of 0.71'. This is offset by an 8' freeboard above high water on the upstream side of the pipe. -- KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST p 1811 RCP 300' 50 $15,000 Cleanout or catchbasin 2 3.000 6,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 21,000 Q 24" RCP 200 1 60 $ 12,000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 3 3,000 9,000 Desiltation Basin 1 00.000 LS 80,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $101,000 R 18 11 RCP 100' 50 $ 5,000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 1.0 3,000 s 3,000 ======== SUBTOTAL s 8,000 ======== TOTAL AREAS A THRU R $884.000 -- KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT 1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST I 3611 RCP 500' 100 $ 50.000 30" RCP 280 1 80 22.400 1811 RCP 180' 50 9.ooo Cleanout or Catchbasin 9 I 3.000 27,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $108.400 1811 RCP 260' 50 $ 13,000 3011 RCP 580' 80 46,400 Cleanout or Catchbasin 7 3.000 21.000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 80.400 K 1811 RCP 430' 50 $ 21,500 Cleanout or Catchbasin . 2 3,000 6,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 27,500 -L 18 II RCP 100' 50 $ 5.ooo Cleanout or Catchbasin 1 3,000 3,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 8,000 M 10" RCP 300 1 50 $ 15.000 Cleanout or Catchbasin 2 3.000 6.000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 21.000 N 1811 RCP 430' 50 $ 21.500 Cleanout or Catchbasin 2 3,000 6,000 ========= SUBTOTAL $ 27.500 0 18" RCP 880 1 50 $ 44,000 30" RCP 80' 90 6,400 Cleanout or catchbasin 5 3,000 15,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 65,400 -- - TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS for DLLY UHCJI UD DCILI'?IZS DDGZHmr1' :son 8 Prepared for KAUFMAN AND BROAD April 16, 1987 (Revised October 15, 1987} (Revised November 10, 1987} (Revised March 31, 1988) (Revised August 31, 1988) URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, PLANNING Consultants to Business and Government 4540 Keamy Villa Road, suite 106 San Diego, calitomia 92123 (619) 560-4911 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT Introduction ••••••••••• Existing Conditions •••••••• Proposed Projects Within F.M.Z. 8 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment . . FUture Short-Term Impact and Mitigation Analysis Transportation Improvements Phasing .•.•• SANDAG/Carlsbad Buildout Traffic Forecast •• Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . i • • . . . . ~ 1 2 4 6 8 13 14 17 L I S T FIGURE NUMBER SUBJECT 0 F F I G U R E S lli! 2A Figure l Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Project Location. . . . . . . . . . Traffic Flow Map •• . . . . . . . . City of Carlsbad Local Facility Management Zones. . . . . Facility Management Zone 8 (FMZ 8) . . . Kelly Ranch Planning Area Boundaries F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution&: Assignment 3A 4A 4B 4C Phase I. (1990) • . • . • . • • . . . . . 6A F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution&: Assignment Phase I+ II (1991) • . • . • • . • . • 6B F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution & Assignment Phase I + II + III (1992) . • • . • . • 6C F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution&: Assignment Phase I+ II+ III+ IV (1993) • • • • • 60 -F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution&: Assignment Phase I+ II+ III+ IV+ V (1994). . • . 6E 1990 ADT Phase I+ Existing+ Background Traffic 6F 1991 ADT Phase II+ Existing+ Background Traffic 6G 1992 ADT Phase III+ Existing+ Background Traffic 6H 1993 ADT Phase IV+ Existing+ Background Traffic 6I 1994 ADT Phase V +Existing+ Background Traffic 6J 1995 ADT Phase IV+ Existing+ Background Traffic 7A 2000 ADT Phase IV+ Existing+ Background Traffic 7B F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution Percentages, Phase I, 1990 •••••••• SA F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution Percentages, Phase I+ II, 1991 •••••• SB ii CONTINUED LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER SUBJECT Figure 20 F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution Figure 21 Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 25 Percentages, Phase I+ II+ III, 1992 •• SC F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution Percentages, Phase I+ II+ III+ IV, 1993 • • • • • • 80 F.M.Z. 8 Trip Distribution Percentages, Phase I+ II+ III+ IV+ V, 1994. • • . SE Future Traffic Volumes (Unadjusted) Build-out/Fully Constrained General Plan 14A Recommended Street Classifications Build-out/Fully Constrained General Plan 14B Locations Impacted by 201 or More of Traffic From F.M.Z. a, Build-out/Fully constrained General Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14C LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER SUBJECT ~ 4D Table l Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Facilities Management Zone 8 Proposed Land Use And Trip Generation • Conceptual Development Phasing F.M.Z. 8 Land Uses •••••• . . . . . Impacted Intersections Levels of Service Impacted Street Segment Level of Service (Method fl Analysis -ADT) ••••••• Road Segment Peak Bour LOS (Method 12 Analysis •••• . . . . . . . Transportation Improvements Phasing. Buildout Forecast Levels of Service at Intersections and Street Segments Impacted SA 9A l0A-B lOC 13A by 201 or •ore of F.M.Z. 8 Traffic. • • 15A iii - APPENDIX Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I A P P E N D I C E S SUBJECT SANDAG Traffic Generation Rates •• . . . Level of Service and Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) ••••• ICU Calculations at Impacted Intersections (Existing -Buildout) street Segment LOS Worksheets (H.C.M. Peak Hour Analysis) • Hillside Drive/Park Drive Existing Peak Hour VolUllles •• . . . . . . • • • • • . . . . . . ~ 19 20 21-53 54-74 75 Unit A Peak Hour Trips, Trip Distribution 76 -. (1986-1990) + 31 Growth+ Unit A Peak Hour Trips • • • • • • • • • • • • • 77 (1986-1990) + 31 Growth+ Unit A Peak Hour Trips ••••••••••••• 78 All-way Stop LOS. • .• • • • • • • • • • • 79 iv .. INTRODUCTION Facilities Management Zone a-Kelly Ranch Transportation Analysis Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Kaufman and Broad to address potential transportation related impacts for the Kelly Ranch project and additional parcels within the City of Carlsbad Facilities Management Zone (F.M.Z.) 8. once potential traffic impacts were identified; a transportation system improvements phasing plan was developed which will mitigate off-site traffic impacts in accordance with the City of Carlsbad's Growth Management Program circulation system performance standard. In order-to determine the transportation related impacts which are likely to result from land uses within F.M.Z. a, and to develop the off-site transportation improvements phasing plan, Urban Systems obtained and evaluated existing traffic flow data for the area,_ future short-term traffic, and projections for future long-term traffic flow as provided by the San Diego Association of Governments {SANDAG) in their City of Carlsbad Constrained General Plan Use Traffic Forecast of August 29, 1986. This Urban Systems report, addressing potential transportation impacts for the Kelly Ranch project and other uses within F.M.Z. 8, is divided into the following ~ections: ·Existing Conditions •proposed Projects Within P.M.z. a ·Trip Generation, Distribution, And Assignment ·FUture Short-Term Impact And Mitigation Analysis ·Transportation Improvements Phasing ·sANDAG/Carlsbad Buildout Traffic Forecast ·conclusions And Recommendations Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 EXISTING CONDITIONS Orban Systems Associates, Inc. The Kelly Ranch, F.M.Z. a area shown in rigure 1, is essentially undeveloped. Kelly Drive, a two lane collector street, provides partial access to the north boundary of F.M.Z. a from El camino Real. El Camino Real along the easterly portion of F.M.Z. 8 is currently an interim. four lane primary arterial that will be improved to six lane primary arterial standards as abutting properties develop. Palomar Airport Road, currently _a pa~ially improved primary arterial· street, extends from El camino Real to Interstate 5 (I-5) south of F.M.Z. 8 and provides the nearest freeway access to the site location. Palomar Airport Road is currently undergoing improvement to six lane primary arterial standards for portions of its length between Camino Vida Robles and El Camino Real. The largest portion of this street west of Camino Vida Robles is currently only two lanes, however, the remainder between Paseo del Norte and Camino Vida Robles is to be improved by Palomar Airport Road Assessment District funds. Improvements are planned to begin in 1988, and should be completed in 1989. Interstate 5 to the west of F.M.Z. 8 is an eight lane freeway that provides for major north-south regional traffic flow through the Carlsbad area. cannon Road currently passes under I-5 directly west of the project area. Although cannon Road currently extends only approximateiy 800 feet east of I-5 it will eventually extend easterly from I-5, through the project area, to El camino Real. 000187 ICellyrch/lSC ti ~OUlfC(: 811!.t Map r AOl1 Atll I loL F'1,0TC1•M"" Coo,:, AUG•JS T 198£, USCD WITH P[RMl~SIOU rRf)O'I AtRIAL PHOlOOAN,:, INC, /t'liAN l>l!mo _ ~ _. <,:{)-.. \ \ \ I \ I /-✓--\ I _., ( :::;..;;=,..-----------------,. I • PROJECT I I' '-, Evans Point \ l ,.,.. ,, tr /. --~ I I , , .. :t..'-·-------------. ', ' .:,. __ / ~-:/- I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ---~----\ V FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH ---.;,,,,,,.- • V .l I '·· U.S.A. INC. ~ 2...,/,_8_7 ______________ _ 000187 (2-A) Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Tamarack Avenue, which varies from a two to four lane collector street, extends from I-5 to El Camino Real north of F.M.Z. 8. Hillside Drive and Park Drive are two lane streets that provide access to the northern portion of F.M.Z. 8 from Tamarack Avenue. Park Drive is a two lane collector street that extends parallel to the northerly boundary of F.M.Z. 8 and connects to the existing southerly end of Kelly Drive. Existing traffic flows on these F.M.Z. 8 streets are shown in Figure ' . 2, SANDAG's 1987 Average Weekday Traffic Volumes. 000187 -3 -Kellyrch/lSC NQ SCALE YOLUMl!S SHOWN ON MAP IN THOUSAN05 10001 1tl7 AVl!IIIAGE WEEKOAY TRAFFIC YOI.UMU SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN AREA IIIIAEPARl!O BY $AN OtEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOYl!ANMENTS MAY 1917 -~·-,~_,.. ' . \ ~,·' " .,,. . . . ..~ ..... I • • ••• .. FIGURE 2 TRAFFIC FLOW MAP FMZ I/KELLY RANCH e 3="'=,':'::aa:----------U.S.A. INC. ____________ ,,/ (3-A) 000111 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 PROPOSED PROJECTS WITHIN F.M.Z. 8 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Figure 3 shows the general boundaries of the City of Carlsbad Local Facility Management Zones. Figure 4 shows more specific F.M.Z. s boundaries, the ownership, and acreage within the zone and Figures shows the specific planning areas for Kelly Ranch within F.M.Z. 8. Table 1 shows the. proposed. land use and trip generation for the ownerships within F.M.Z. 8. Kelly Ranch proposes a mix of 1,214 single family and multi-family residences with approximately 9.o acres of commercial recreation (recreation room, tennis courts, etc.) uses. The Kelly Ranch project is proposed to be developed in four yearly phases as shown in TGle 1. The Kirgis property is proposed to be developed with approximately eleven single family dwelling units and is anticipated to develop during the last phase of the Kelly Ranch project. The Macario Canyon Park area is assumed to include 98 acres of developable land, approximately half of which is within F.M.Z. s. According to the Macario Canyon Park Development Plan of December, 1981, (on file with the City of Carlsbad) the park was proposed to develop over a 15 year period and attract 3,500 potential park users each weekday. Assuming two persons per vehicles and two trips per vehicle (one arrival,one departure) for the park area, Ta!,le 1 shows an approximate total of 1,715 trips for Macario canyon Park within F.M.Z. a. Since the Macario canyon Park Development plan is to be revised, it is assumed that development will not begin until at least 1989 and the park would then be incrementally developed over a 15 year period. 000187 Kellyrch/18C 110 SCALE. SOURCE: City of Catflbad Growttl Ma .. gamMC f>rop111 S.,tamblr I 6. 1986 FIGURE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONES FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH ,,,/ kl ~-----------U.S.A. INC. ----------o-oo...-1sT 0 8/88 (4-A) OWNERSHIP: ACREAGE: ---: ::--..::-., __;.Q!lp.~ . 0 KAUFMAN & BROAD © HOWARD KIRGIS © CITY OF CARLSBAD ._ __ 432.8 . :r: I . -~ ··:-~ it .. ··--~ ;!1 I: ... " , ; I I e:,._ '\ • :~a· ........ , \ .. :., . ,~~~-. • ... t_: 22.0 . .-u ~ .. :~?,' "~tl::>-m·. :E. °?'6",. ·:. --~~_.~::-a:·,.--:-~' .. --==-.;:.\ 276 ,.-:· .. (, ;~~~t-'~ .· :t-~-·t~~:>:.~ .5 . ~ •. r. ;,,,.· •\':.!'I \ ~.., \ • •. : · ---/ ·c~. -~ ~\ :·:·I'.,-.., ...... , .. '-~ . \ .,.. TOT AL: 7 3 1.3 .-.11: ~ ,. ::,,, _'l-; • AC. '-... . ~ i:,, &:· ' . 3 ...-:_.~.,~ ··-·-:-......_,.· CIIIDIWTM ...,,,.....,. PlltCIG1 0111 arr ar CNIJIIIG I ~ i !">'-·-r-. '=-...l =~-c-1 ··--....... --_,.,..,._IIIIQAO ----... --- so.R:E: Turrtnl & Brink FIGURE 4 FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE 8 (FMZ 8) FMZ 1/ICELL Y RANCH ~ 4/87 U.S.A. INC. ________ .....,_,. 000187 (4-B) B KELLY RANCH PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES FMZ I/KELLY RANCH .,_ ___ U.S.A. INC. ------ 176 o.u. (D I Q \ 85 o.u. (IV) I {!fr NO SCI.LE ,.ooo '" 7 - 8 8/88 ZONES TABLE 1 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8 PROPOSED LANO USE AND TRIP GENERATION PLAN-NING LAND TRIP OWNER AREA use• INTENSITY• RATE. .. TRIPS PHASE BY YEAR• KE.L.L.Y RANCH A MF 140 DU 8/DU 1,120 I (1990) B OS 201.8 AC 0 0 N/A C MF 70 OU 8/DU 560 11 ( 1991 ) E SF 176 OU 10/DU 1,760 I (1990) F COr-N. 9.0 AC 8/AC 72 IV (1993) G ox 70 DU 8/DU 560 I (1990) H MF 90 DU ,8/0U 720 II (1991) SF' 75 DU 10/ou 750 II (1991) J MF 80 OU 8/DU 640 111 (1992) K MF 90 OU 8/DU. 720 11 ( 1991 ) L MF 33 DU -8/0U 264 111 (1992) M MF 15 OU 8/DU 120 V (1994) N MF' 35 DU 8/DU 280 111 (1992) 0 MF 90 OU 8/DU 720 111 ( 199 2) p MF 80 OU 8/DU 640 IV (1993) a MF 85 DU 8/0U 680 IV (1993) R MF 85 DU 8/DU 680 IV (1993) SUB TOTAL: 10,286 KlRGIS Sf' 11 DU 10/DU 110 V (1994) MACARIO PARK! DEVELOPED 49 (CITY or CARL.SB.AO) PARK AC 35/AC 1,715 V (1994) TOTAL: 12.11, LEGEND: MF • MtOIUM/MtOIUM-HIGH RtSIOtNTIAL Sf • SINGL.t FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OS • OPEN SPACC COMM.• COMMCRCIAL RtCR[ATION ox • DuP1..tx SOURCE: • TuRRINI ANO BRINK •• SANOAG NOTE: THt PHASING MAY OCCUR OUT or OROtR ANO OWCLL.ING UNITS IN (ACH Pl.ANNING ARCA MAY VARY Ir THE R[OUIREO PUBLIC rACIL.tlltS AR[ PROVIOCD, FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. (4-0) 000187 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Table 2 summarizes trip generation by phase and year as identified in Table 1. ,- 000187 -5 -Kellyrch/18C » 8/88 U ZO.EBA PHASE I I l I I IV V TABLE 2 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PHASING F .M.Z. 8 LAND USES KELLY RANCH KIRGIS MACARIO CANYON YEAR TRIPS TRIPS' TRIPS 1990 3,440 ---------- 1991 2.750 ---------- 1992 1,904 ---------- 1993 2.072 110 114 1994 120 ---------- 10.286 110 114 SUB TOTAL: 1994 TO 2002 N/A N/A 1,601 GRANO TOTAL: 10,510 1,601 12,111 NOTE: THE PHASING MAY OCCUR OUT OF ORDER ANO THE AOT It EACH PHASE MAY VARY IF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED. FIIZ a/lCELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. ---------~ (S-A) 000181 I I Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND ASSIGNMENT Table 1 includes a tabulation of vehicle trip generation from F.M.Z. 8 based on SANDAG's trip generation rates (Appendix A). Figura s shows the F.M.Z. 8 planning area locations with respect to the existing and proposed street system. Trips generated from F.M.Z. 8 were distributed and assigned to the street network as shown in Figures 6,7,8,9, and 10 to coincide with the conceptual phasing shown in Tabla 2. The assigned trips were then added to available existing traffic volumes factored upward to account for area-wide growth, and the resulting traffic volumes are shown in Figures 11, 12, 13, 1•, and. 15. The combined traffic volumes-(ie. existing and area growth and F.M.Z. 8) were then used for the future short-term impact and mitigation analysis in the following section·of this report. To account for background traffic due to area-wide growth during the development of F.M.Z. 8, the existing traffic volumes on existing through streets, El Camino Real, Tamarack Avenue and Palomar Airport Road, were factored upwards by three percent each year from the base year of the existing traffic volume counts through the anticipated completion year of the Kelly Ranch project. Additionally, traffic from F.M.Z. 15 was also included in the total traffic volumes. Zone 15 traffic was derived from Urban Systems' draft March 16, 1988, Transportation Analysis for F.M.Z. 15. An additional 5,000 daily trips were assumed to use Cannon Road as area-wide through trips when the connection is made between I-5 and El Camino Real. No reduction of existing trips was assumed for Palomar Airport Road or Tamarack Avenue, between I-5 and El Camino 000187 -6 -Kellyrch/18~ l.£GEND: XX.X = Distributed Trips XXX • Assigned Trips NOTE: The phaaing may occur out of order and dwtlllng unlta In ·each planning area may vary If the required public tacllltlu are provided. FIGURE e F .MZ. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT PHASE I 1990 NO SCALE FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH ~ ~ ~----------U.S.A. INC. _________ __, t) e1ee (6-A) 0001aT LEGEND: XX.X Distributed Trt,a XXX • Aaaipcl Trips 2,765 NOTE: The pha ■lng may occur out of ordar and dwelling units In each planning area may vary It t'he required public tacllltlta art provided. FIGURE 7 593 336 F .M.Z. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT PHASE I• II 1991 NO SCALE FIil a/KELLY RANCH / '----------U.S.A. INC. ------------8/88 (6_8) 000187 LEGEM>: X ::(.X = Olatnbvtad Tri,a XXX • Anlpd Tri" NOTE: The phasing may occur out of order and dwelllng unite in each planning area may vary If the required public facllltlea are provided. FIGURE 8 962 33Ei - F .MZ. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT PHASEl•ll•III 1992 FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH NO SCAL.E ~ 8/88 U.S.A. INC. ----------0 -00-,-.1 (6-C) L£GEN>: XXX = Distributed Trips XXX • A11i9ned Trips 1,273 338 NOTE: The phulnt 11ay occur oat of order and dwelllnt ualta la each planalnt area t'lay vary If the required p•bllc facllltlH are provided. FIGURE 9 1,273 336 1,809 F .M.Z. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT PHASE I • II • Ill • IV 1993 FIIZ 1/ICELL Y IIANCH NO SCALE ~ 8/88 u / . S.A. INC. --•---------0-0-0 -:,. 1 (6-D) - L£GEM): 1,715 6,050 7,765 X X.X : D11tnbin:.d Trt,-xxx C ..... .,. Tit,- 336 1,297 --1,633 1,297 ~ 1,297 NOTE: The phuing 111ay occur out of order and dwelling unite in each planning atH May ury If the required public facllltlu ar1 provided. FIGURE 10 336 1,297 F.MZ. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT PHASE I • II • Ill • IV • V 1994 Fll1 IIICELL Y ltANCH NO SCALC ~ 8/88 U.S.A. INC.------------< 6-E) ooo 1• i LEGEND: XXX • F.M.Z. e Only XXX • F .M.Z. 8 + Exl1tlng + Back9")Und Tratrlc ASSUMES NO CONNECTION TO OCEANSC>E NO SCALE NOTE: A11umt1 5,000 AOT Through on Cannon Road Diverted From P.A.R. Before Interchange Improvements. FIGURE 11 (1990) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) PHASE I •EXISTING• BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FIIZ I/ICELL Y RANCH _/ ~ --------------U.S.A. INC. •• ---------0-0-0 -,a 1 0 B/a8 (6-F') LEGEND: 0.0 21.2 ~< 3i·95 . ASSUMES NO CONNECTION • TO OCEANSIDE 0.0 17 .o NO SCALE XXX • F.M.Z. a Only XXX • F .M.Z. a+ Exiatlng + Background Trame NOTE: AHu11e1 5,000 ADT Through Dlvertad Fro• P.A.R. Before Interchange l•prove11enta. 8 8/88 FIGURE 12 (1991) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) PHASE II • EXISTING • BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FltlZ I/« ELLY IIANCH USA.mc.----------0-00-,~.7 (6-G) 2.5 46.9 ll-1.3 .4 CONNECTION TO OCEANSIDE - ASSUMED IN 1992. 5,000 ADT THROUGH TO 1-5 ON CANNON RO. LEGEND: XXX • F.M.Z. a Only 4.5 I 5.0 o.o 27.2 XXX • F.M.Z. 8 +Exlltlng +Background Tsafflc NOTE: I-~ P. .A.ft. Interchange Improvements AHumed Completed in I 992.; 5,000 AOT Diverted From Cannon to P.A.R. FIGURE 13 (1992) ACT (IN THOUSANDS) 0.0 22.9 PHASE Ill • EXISTING ~ BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FIIZ I/IC ELLY RANCH AVE. 0.0 8.0 .. 0 SCAI.[ 8/88 U.S.A. INC. ----------0 -00-,-.1 (6-H) 3.2 I 5 I .3 LEGEND: 5.9 20.5 o.o 28.0 XXX • F.M.Z. 8 ~y XXX • F.M.7.. 8 ... Exlatlng ~ Backgraund Traffic FIGURE 14 (1993) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) o.o 23.6 PHASE IV• EXISTING• BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FMZ 1/ICELL Y RANCH .. 0 SCALE / U.S.A. INC. -■ ---------0-0-0 .,,. 1 (6-1) 4.1 155.8 LEGEND: i,4~9 CANNON 6 _ 1 21.3 XXX = F.t.t.z. 8 Only tU>- o.o 28.8 o.o 24.3 NO SCALE XXX = F .t.t.z. 8 + Existing ♦ Background Traffic FIGURE 15 (1994) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) PHASE V • EXISTING • BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 8/88 FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH _/ ,__ _________ U.S.A. INC. -•---------- ,6.J) 000117 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Real, after the Cannon Road extension is assumed. Pigures 16 and 17 show the future traffic volumes for the years 1995 and 2000, respectively. These future volumes were derived by increasing existing volumes due to background growth and adding traffic from F.M.Z. 15 and F.M.Z. s. 000187 -7 -Kellyrch/18C -6.1 60.5 LEGEND: . ~~· . v~-........; · 0.0 31.5 XXX • F.M.Z. a ONy XXX • F.M.Z. 8 + E,ilating + Bac:kpound Tl9.fflc FIGURE 18 (1995) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) ' o.o 25.3 PHASE IV • EXISTING • BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 0.6 I 1.0 1 44 NO SCALE. FMZ II/KELLY RANCH / ~ ......_ _________ U.S.A. INC. _________ ___,. 8/88 <1-~> 000187 4.1 165.3 LEGEND; 6.5 23.6 0.0 36.7 XXX • F"J.t.Z. a twy XXX • F J.t.Z. 8 + Exi,tlffi + BackgrtM.nf Traffic: FIGURE 17 (2000) ADT (IN THOUSANDS) PHASE IV • EXISTING • BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 0.6 I 6.0 1 5 NO SCALE. FIIZ_ II/KELLY RANCH _,..} ~ ~----------U.S.A. INC. ___________ .....,, \l e188 ( 7 .. 5) ooo 1s1 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, l.988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. FUTURE SHORT-TERM IMPACT ANO MITIGATION ANALYSIS The following analysis is based on the projected short-term cumulative traffic volumes, shown in J'iguras 11 through 17, from the proposed yearly development of F.M.Z. s, plus a yearly incremental increase in traffic volumes due to the assumed area-wide growth and traffic from the adjacent F.M.Z. 1.5. Based on the ADT assignment shown in Yiguras 11 through 17 the F.M.Z. strip distribution percentages for the phased development of Zone a and Kelly Ranch are shown in -J'igures 18 through 22. These figures identify impacted locations for each phase of development of Zone 8 and the Kelly Ranch project. -The following analysis evaluates the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone s. For the purpose of the analysis of the traffic facilities, this section will analyze intersections and road segments separately. In accordance with the adopted performance standard, the existing and proposed traffic facilities within and surrounding Zone 8 will be identified by an evaluated Level of Service (LOS). The performance standard determines that during peak hours an LOS of A through D as acceptable and an LOS of E or greater to be ·unacceptable. If a facility is determined to fail to meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an acceptable LOS. The proposed mitigation program will more thoroughly later in this report. 000187 -8 - be discussed • Kellyrch/18C - ~ 8.188 CHESTN'11' AVENUE - FIGURE 18 F.MZ. 8 TRP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES PHASE I ( 1990) FIIZ 1/ICELLY RANCH NC SCAL[ U.S.A. INC. -----------Ca-A) ooo 1s 1 -CHESTNUT FIGURE 19 FMZ. 8 TRP DISTRBUTION PERCENTAGES PHASE I• II (1991) NO SCALE FIIZ a/KELLY RANCH / J1 ..... ,-,-91----------U.S.A. INC.------------1.:l 0001B7 (8-8) 1; ·a,ea C~tli!!ESffiEJ:~UlL./:.,._~~£:5:!Ni!;O!,!iE__.,--- 16 FIGURE 20 F .M.Z. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENT AGES PHASE I ~ II • Ill (1992) FMZ I/KELLY RANCH NO $CAL[ U.S.A. INC.------------0001a1 (8-C) CHESTN!.li FIGURE 21 F.M.Z. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES PHASE I • II • Ill • IV (1993) F"Z I/KELLY RANCH / 'fl "----------U.S.A. INC. ------------{) ·e,ae (B-D) 000181 ~ "8/88 CH~U'T AVENUE - FIGURE 22 F.M.Z. 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES PHASE I + 11 • Ill • IV• V (1994) FltlZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. (B-E) 000181 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Tal:>l• 3 lists the impacted intersections studied and indicates the LOS for each of the intersections for each of the years the Zone s projects are developed, 1990 through 1994, for 1995, 2000, and City buildout. The intersections were evaluated using data and methods contained in the "City of Carlsbad Guidelines for the Preparation of Zone Plan Circulation Elements". As Tal:,le 3 shows, all intersections either located within Zones or impacted by Zone 8 traffic meet the performance standard and continue to meet the standard through bu~ldou~. Ho intersection falls below ' Service Level D ·in any location. The intersection capacity utilization (ICU) worksheets are included in Appendiz B. The City of Carlsbad Guidelines uses a two-tier evaluation to analyze the LOS for road segments. The two methods include average daily traffic volume/capacity ratios and an analysis of peak hour volumes- for certain segments. The first level of analysis determines an approximate off peak LOS using a ratio of existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to an assumed average roadway capacity. This volume to capacity ratio provides an indication of LOS (A-F) of the road segments. This method is a very generalized approach in determining LOS and is used as an indicator of the off-peak LOS. According to the adopted performance standard, no road segment or intersection impacted by traffic generated from Zone 8 shall exceed a Level of Service C during off peak hours or a Level of Service D during peak hours. The daily capacity m•thod, as described above, analyzes a road segment for a daily average volume and is not an indicator of peak hour volumes. Therefore, in conjunction with the 000187 Kellyrch/lSC ) TABLE 3 IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE 1988 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 2000 BUILDCIJT EXISTING LOCATION 11111 Pl'I 111'1 PP1 M PIii 11111 PP1 API PPI M Pfll API PPI API PPI 111'1 Pl'I TMARACK AVEH/1-5 SOUTflDJN> OFF ffAIIP A A A A ------------------------------------- TMARACK AVENlE/I-5 NlRTtlDN> CFF R#P A A A " --------------------------------------- TMARAD< AVENlE/PJO PICO DRIVE A A A A ------------------------------------- TAIIIARACIC AVEM£/ADMS STREET A A A A ------------------------------------- TMARACK AIIEME/HIGHl.Am DRIVE A A A A ---------------------------------- TAl'IARACK AVEtu:/PARK DRIVE A A A A --------------; ------------------------ EL CMIMJ REAL/TMIIRAD< AVENl£ A A . B B ----' --------------------f--------. I EL CAl'lltll REAL/KELLY DRIVE A A A A A A A A A A A A B A I A A A A NOT EL CIIPIIMJ REAL/CAtNlN ROAD BUILT B A C A C B D C D C D D C C e C EL CMINO REAL/CCI..LEGE BCll.EVARO A A A A ------------------------------------ till CAtlDI ROAD/FARADAY AVEM£ BUILT A A A A A A A A A " " " " C A C till CAtNJN ROAD/KELLY DRIVE BUILT " A A A " A A A A " A A " A " A CANMJN RDAD/PASEO DEL tllRTE A A " " A " A A A e A e 8 C C D C D CAfNlN ROAD/I-5 mmeun OFF RAPP A A A A A A A 8 " C A C B A l C A e e C«.NMJN ROAD/I-5 SOOTtl!OUNl Cf"F RAPP A A A B 8 e C C D D D D A A e A A e FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH If A ..... ,-__ -n ______ U.S.A .. INC. -----------------------------0-0--ora~, Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. August 31, 1988 performance standard, the evaluated LOS utilizing the daily capacity method is indicative of off peak operating levels and a Level of Service C will not be exceeded. The second level of review for road segments analyzes peak hour capacities. This is a more detailed analysis and is performed when it can be shown that the road segment is functioning at a volume greater than the desireable maximum. This method utilizes traffic flow during peak hours to determine the appropriate LOS. This more detailed analysis is used failure of the road segment. to more accurately project the timing of -. . This allows the needed improvements to be scheduled so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Table 4 lists the road segments which are impacted by traffic generated from Zone 8. The LOS results were derived using the daily- capacity method. The road segments requiring peak hour analysis and the LOS resulting from the analysis are summarized in Table 5. Improvement assumptions and LOS for Cannon Road through Zone a, El Camino Real adjacent to Zone 8 to the east, and Tamarack Avenue between I-5 and Adams Avenue are discussed below: Cannon Road The recommended maximum ADT of cannon Road as a four lane, divided major arterial is 40,000 ADT. However, adequate capacity exists if constructed as a two lane collector street through buildout of Kelly Ranch. A peak hour analysis was performed that shows Cannon Road as a two lane divided collector will function at LOS Cat buildout of Zone 000187 -10 -Kellyrch/l8C ( f~tl,J UDTIIJII lLCMJNlllUI. 1.-rack Ava .... Kelly Dt. ••111 Or .... t.n:,n Id. C--lld, -CAU1191 11 ... CMCIII ... OC......IIN.l-r-..... fu.tay ........ h.a Del -.U Pa.a 0.1 lhru -J-S T-"<IVl. J-S -Pio Plm 0,.., Plo Pt.co Dr .... ..._ St.. -St. -Kli,,1-O.. Kli,,1-DI:. -.....,..Ul Dr. 5'rnyhWDr.-Ot..lni,a.al • 5" Pltthod IZ ....i yal■ fcrr UIS ·- TABLE 4 IMPACTED STREET SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (METHOD #1 ANALYSIS -AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC) I ,., I , .. 1112 CLASS ... -t»IICJT1 1/C L.O.S. IUIJ.M 111.U'C CM>ACil'f V/t l.G.S. IUIIII." -waan V/t L.0 .. 1. ! a.All .. H -CliPaCm 1/t l.O.S. • SI l•l 2'.I :D.3 .. ,. • SI Cl) a.s 33..3 a.• II" ... ,., -SU: lMU S Ult L~ ... (■) --!£[ TALC 5 FIii LOS-- • SA (I) 2,.1 :Jl.J a.,. C 0 II {I) a.o ;JJ.J 0.111 II" 41A(■J -KE lAflt.[ 5 rm LC!---•11 l■l -!££ UII.£ 5 FIii I.CS-- ... <•> 21.1 31.J D.'J.I • SA I•> :n.• ll.J D,111 £• •III•> --SEC ue .. ! 5 '°' lll5---•SI(■) -•-SE.C 1-..c 5 FOA LOS-- ---Mll IUlU ---2 C (1) ... 22.2 D .. Al JC (1) 11.1 22.2 II.SJ • 2 C (■) u •• 22.2 O.lll • ---IDt am., ---Z C {N) .... ZI.Z .. .. a z Cl•> ll.l 22.2 a.m 2 C (I) 15.0 22.2 D.11 • O 11A (I) 11.1 ... 5 11.21 • ... (■) 22.1 ... 5 11.51 I ... ,., 25.J ... , a.n I •,,. t■I 21.2 ... 5 a.• I IC (Y) 23.1 :rr., 11.15 .,. • C (Tl 25.D 17.1 a.m II" ---mt -------IDt---- IC (l) ,a.o 17.1 O.lll IC (T) ••• 17.1 D.l1 • ---IDtllf>'CltD------IIITll'PICIO--- zc 1.0 11.1 O.OI JC ... II.I o.sz • ---MlT DP.atD ------Mlt---- 2C , .. 11.1 .... • I 2 t 1.5 ,1.1 0,!!'7 • ---1111 DPIIC!tD ------Mlt ll'NCl[D --- 6 C (T) , .. :rr.1 0,27 • C (T) 1.5 17,8 0.3' ---IDT IJ'PacttD ------IDTJ.IPOC1(J)--- 5tf'N\. 0..slflclU-. •• ~ lly tit)' Steff• l[GOl)1 UIS lllltRIM. IUSSIFWITIIII M:t(SS I PA (N) • I LMa PtS-,-, ArtaW .. • a.111-11.111 I PA t•l • I Lino ,._ .... 1■1 -I 0.11 -D.TG .... ,., -..... llojM ,.. ... w .. C 0.'11 -0.111 A SA • • uni Sacardlry AnarJ.al -D a.II -II.Ill 6 C (Y) • a Lono ~ TtS t 0.11 -1.111 2 C (■) • 2 .._,. C.U..:tar ND , IIITNtlldlliN. 2L • 2LAN&.oml TtS ) Pot• I ol 2 ••J IUSl." -a.tan 1/t l.D.5. • u t■I -SU taa.[ S FCII ll:5- 111 f■) -•t 1.-.1 s ,1111 us-.. -- 411 (I) -SU TMl.l 5 rt11 LOS-- JC (1) 11.7 22.2 0.15 C Z C l•l :111.1 22,2 D.12 t• ... (~) la.I ... 5 0,13 C ---111T WICltll ---___ .,,-___ ---MlTlll'AClrll--- ·---MlTDIW:ltll--- ---Mll IPPAC!tO ---- URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. _________ ..:,F.;;;11.;;.Z,_8_/K ... E_L_L_Y_RA_N_c_H _________________________ _, ( 10-A) ooo,a1 , .. -uanm iuu... --.n v,c a..a.s. IUII." -_, ,ic LJJ. cua.• -_,., v,c L.1.1. IUII ... --n ,,c LJJ. rau,ar.--lld. C-lld.-C.U..,.ll.._ u ___ ,...., .... ... ,., -Ul&El•m----1111-------1111-- • • l■I _,&[,,.Ullo----1111-----1111-- •• l■I -Ul&EI,__ ---1111----_..., ____ ••l•I n.z "•' L:11 • ~•l•I 11.J tt.s LJZ a • • l■I n., II.I L:11 t M (■I :11.3 tt.5 LU A It M l■I ILJ II.I LIi I IMI■) n.• II.I LU ·------lltl--lltl--11-1 tM(■J lit.I to.I L11 C tMl■J 311.D ti.I LD I IM(■J MJ to.I L11 I-I-Na-It. ...,_ .. ____ _ -St.-111_,i.nilt. lll~Dr.-lln.,..ualro ....,.,uJDr.-UCMINllool • ... -Ill -rd■ fu UIS ---1111--- ---1111--- ---1111--- ---1111--- ---1111-------1111-------1111----___ ... ___ _ ---1111---- "_,_, ... _ .. _..,en,_,_ -IUalFJClllJIII -IN(■I • ....... _, .. ,_lol Ill .,. l■I • ............. a - I M (IJ • I ._.. "'la ..... a Ill ... • ..... -.. ...... 1 - IC(Y) • , .... -■c. ,U ZC(IJ ■ Z._.._ Ill IL • Z._..Laal IU UIS I lldll-L■ I LIi -LTD C L71-L■ D LIii -Liii E LIii -I.Ill ,1111_ ------ -··---·..., --···-·-·-_..., ___ _ ___ ..., ___ _ ---1111---- -.. 1111 JIIIICID- ---1111---- A I M (■) 11.5 11.s L:111 I IM (II) IL7 11.S LIi C IM(IJ 311.5 II.I L■ • ___ ..., ___ _ -D IIIIIICD--··--1111---·-· _ __ ..., ___ _ ---1111----- ,.,. 2 ., 2 URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. _________ F_.,_z_a/_x_E_LL_Y_R_A_N_c..,H __________________________ J ., .. Z0NE8J (10-B) ooo,a1 TABLE 5 ROAD SEGMENT PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE (METHOD +2 ANALYSIS) LOCATION CANNON ROAD EL CAl'IINO REAL -FARADAY AVE. FARADAY AVE. -PASEO DEL NORTE EL CAPIINO REAL TAPIARACK AVE. -KELLY OR. KELLY OR. -CANNON ROAD CANNON RO. -COLLEGE BLVO. ~ 8/88 ZONEBL 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AM Pl'I AM Pl'I AM PPI AM Pl'I AM Pl'II -. A A A A B B C C A A (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (4 LANES) A A A A B 8 C C A A (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (4 LANES) A A A A A A A A A A (4 LANES) (4 LANES} (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LAr£S) A A A A A A A A A A (4 LANES} (4 LAtES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) A A A A A A A A B B (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LAIIES) FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. _________ ___, (10-C) 000111 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban systems Associates, Inc. 8. As background traffic citywide increases, Cannon Road will need to -- be improved to its ultimate width. The daily capacity analysis of cannon Road as a four lane major arterial indicates a service level of A through the year 2000 for both segments between El Camino Real and Faraday Avenue, and between Faraday Avenue and Paseo Del Norte. El Camino Real El Camino Real wiil ultimately be a six lane primary arterial with an AO'l' of 40,000 or more. The analysis of daily traffic for this roadway before its ultimate buildout to six lanes indicates service levels exceeding the City standard. However, to assure that interim capacity will exist, peak hour analyses were performed for three segments between Tamarack Avenue and College Boulevard. The analyses indicate that the segments from Tamarack Avenue to cannon Road will function at LOS "A" through 1992. Beyond that time the peak hour LOS will not be below "C". The LOS for the segment between Cannon Road and College Boulevard will function at a LOS "A" through 1990, and LOS "C" in 1994. Tamarack Avenue Tamarack Avenue between Pio Pico Drive and I-5, as a four lane collector street, is projected to fall below the City's performance standard in 1989. However, the City is currently working with CalTrans to complete improvements to mitigate the projected failure. Two traffic signals will be installed at the northbound and southbound freeway ramps. The current C.I.P. has allocated $120,000 for the installation of these signals in FY 1987-88. In addition, the City is coordinating with CalTrans on the installation of a traffic 000187 -11 -Kellyrch/18~ Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. signal at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and Adams Street to replace the existing four-way stop. The C.I.P. allocates $80,000 toward the installation of the signal at this intersection. Together, these improvements will fully mitigate projected traffic impacts to Tamarack Avenue. It is noted that after 1990, less than twenty percent of Zone 8 traffic will impact this road segment. Therefore, no special mitigation is required. Also, once Cannon Road is connected between I-5 and El Camino Real, the volume of traffic on Tamarack Avenue is expected to d~crea~e as a result of the through traffic diverting to Cannon Road. This diversion of traffic will more than offset the increase in traffic from Zone 8. 000187 -12 -I<ellyrch/lSC Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August Jl, 1988 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Based on the conceptual phasing plan shown in Tal:)le 1 and on the future short-term impact and mitigation analysis in the preceeding section of this report, the recommended transportation system improvements and phasing as shown in Table 6 mitigate traffic impacts at locations impacted by 20 percent or more of traffic from proposed land uses within F.M.Z. 8 and the Kelly Ranch project. l_ 000187 -13 -Kellyrch/18C - TABLE e TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING ~ IMPROVEMENT 1990 1. CONSTRUCT CANNON ROAD TO HALF WIDTH MAJOR ARTERIAL STANDARDS FROM EL CAMINO REAL TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF KELLY RANCH. 2. INST ALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT EL CAM I NO REAL AND CANNON ROAD. PROVIDE TWO THROUGH LANES AND SINGLE LEFT TURN LANE AT THE INTERSECTION. -. 3. CONSTRUCT CANNON ROAD TO HALF WIDTH MAJOR ARTERIAL STANDARDS FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF KELLY RANCH TO PASEO DEL NORTE. 4. INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT CANNON ROAD AND PASEO DEL NORTE. 5. INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT TH~ CANNON ROAD/1-5 OFF RAMP INTERSECTIONS. 6. THE CONSTRUCTION OF CANNON ROAD AND THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON CANNON ROAD ARE RECOMMENDED TO BE FINANCED BY THE FORMATION OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OR BY REIMBURSEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. 1994 1. WIDEN CANNON ROAD TO A FULL WIDTH MAJOR ARTERIAL BETWEEN PASEO D£L NORTE AND EL CAMINO REAL. 2. INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT CANNON ROAD/FARADAY AVENUE. 1995 1. INSTALL DUAL LEFT TURN LANES AND SEPARATE RIGHT-TURN ONLY LANES AT ALL LEGS OF THE CANNON ROAD/EL CAMINO REAL INTERSECTION. 2. INST ALL DUAL LEFT TURN LANES AT THE CANNON ROAD/ 1-5 SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP FOR THE SOUTHBOUND TURNS. 3. INSTALL A DUAL LEFT TURN LANE FOR THE EASTBOUND TO NORTHBOUND TURNING MOVEMENT AT THE CANNON ROAD/1-5 NORTHBOUND ON RAMP. \...._ FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH -----------U.S.A. INC. __________ _,. ZONEBB 8188 '( 13-A) 000187 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. SANDAG/CARLSBAD BUILDOOT TRAFFIC FORECAST SANDAG has provided projections of future long-term traffic volumes at build-out of the City in their City of Carlsbad Fully Constrained General Plan Land Use Traffic Forecast of August 29, 1986. Figura 23 ~hows the unrounded, unadjusted traffic volumes for the streets adjacent to F.M.Z. 8 from SANDAG's buildout traffic forecast. Figure 24 shows the recommended street classifications, based on the traffic volumes in Figure 23, that would accommodate the long-term traffic projections at buildout-of the City. The City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program of September 16, 1986, requires that circulation element roads, through or adjacent to -Facility Management Zones, such as those recommended in Pigure 24, be constructed so that the following performance standard is adhered to: "No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the local facility management zone will use the road segment or intersection." To determine locations where traffic from F.M.Z. 8 development impacts the street systems, SANDAG has provided a traffic forecast plot of "Buildout of General Plan, Daily Trips To/From F.M.Z. 8", dated February 3, 1987. The impacted locations derived from this SANDAG plot and the trip•distribution of the manual assignment in rigur• 10 are shown in rigure 25. 000187 -14 -Kellyrch/18C ---- CANNON 18.3 38.3 SOORCE: SANDAG/Carlabad Traffic Forac:aat NO SCALE ~ 8/88 Fully Consnlllld G._..I Plan 8/29/86 FIGURE 23 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES (UNADJUSTED) BUILD-OUT /FULLY CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN (ADT IN THOUSANDS) FIIZ 1/ICELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. _________ ,,,,,. ( 14 -A) ooo 117 -LEGEND: II • 6 Lara Primary Artarla1C40,000 or More A0T) ■■■■■ • 4 Lara Major Anlrial CZ0,000-40,000 A0T) I e e e e • 4 Lai. Secandary Anlrial CZ 0 ,0 0 0 A0T) 0 □□□□ • Z Lan, Controlled Collector ( I 0,000 A0T) •••••••• • '2 Lant Cotlcmr (5,000 AOT) 00000 • Local (500 A0T) FIGURE 24 RECOMMENDED STREET CLASSIFICATIONS BUILD-OUT /FULLY CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH NO SCALE t 8/88 U.S.A. INC. ---------" (14-8) 000187 -- CANNON SOURCE: SANOAG/Carllbad Traffic FOl'IC&1t Fully Cona~lllld General Plan 8/29/86 FIGURE 25 LOCATIONS IMPACTED BY 20% OR MORE OF TRAFFIC FROM F.MZ. 8 BUILD-OUT /FULLY CONSTRAINED GENERAL PLAN (ADT IN THOUSANDS) FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH I. NO SCALE U.S.A. INC. _________ .,. ( 14 _C) ooo 1a1 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. To show compliance with the City's Growth Management Program - circulation element performance standard, the street segments and intersections shown in Pigur• 25 were analyzed as to existing levels of service and future levels of service. Existing traffic volumes were provided by SANOAG and.by the Summary of Traffic Counts for the Carlsbad Traffic Impact Fee st~dy prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates., Inc. Appendix c contains the intersection capacity utilization (ICO) and level of service (LOS) calculations for the existing and future . morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes at the impacted intersections. As shown in Table 7, both the existing and buildout LOS at the impacted intersections is at least a·LOs c during the peak hours. Off-peak levels of service were not calculated since, by inspection, it is obvious that off-peak levels of service also meet the City's performance standard. Table 7 also lists the LOS for the street segments impacted_by traffic from F.M.Z. a. The LOS for these segments is also shown to be in compliance performance standard. with the City's The intersections of Park Drive/Hillside Drive, and Hillside Drive/Tamarack Avenue, and Park Drive/Tamarack Avenue have also been evaluated for project traffic impacts. Unit A loads directly onto Park Drive with traffic distributing to Kelly Drive and Hillside Drive. Appendix B shows the current peak hour volumes at the all-way stop controlled intersections of Hillside Drive/ Tamarack Avenue and Park Drive/Hillside Drive. Appendix P shows the peak hour trip generation and distribution percentage from Unit A. Appendices G, E show the existing peak hour volumes, a three percent yearly increase, and the trips from Unit A. Appendix X shows the level of service 000187 -15 -Kellyrch/l8l. - TABLE 7 BUILDOUT FORECAST LEVELS OF SERVICE AT INTERSECTIONS AND STREET SEGMENTS IMPACTED BY 20% OR MORE OF F.MZ. 8 TRAFFIC eies %CJ£BC LEVEL OF SERVICE AT ll'PACTED INTERSECTIONS EXISTING BUILD-OUT LOCATION A.Pl. P.l'I. A.Pl. P.l'I. CANNON R0/1-5 SOUTHBOUNO. RAP!PS A A CANNON RO/I-5 NORTHBOUND RAl'IPS A A CANNON RD./PASED DEL NORTE A A CANNON RO./KELLY DRIVE - CANNON RO./FARAOAY DRIVE - CANNON RO./EL CAl'IINO RO.L ----NOTE: See Appendices for intersection utilization and L.O.S. calculations. LEVEl OF SERVICE AT IIIIPACTtO STREET SEQ'IENTS LOCATION CANNON RO. (I-5 TO PASEO OEl. NORTE) CANNON RO. (PASEO DEL NORTE TO KEl.LY OP..) CANNON RO. (KELLY OR. TO FARADAY OR.) CANNON RO. (FARADAY OR. TO Et. CAl'\INO REAL) LEGEND: ARTERIAL CLASSIFICATION 6 PA (N) • 6 Lane Primary Arterial 6 PA (N) • 6 Lana Prinie Arterial 4 l'IA (N) • 4 Lane l'lajor Arterial 4 SA • 4 Lane Secondary Arterial 4 C (Y) • 4 Lana Collector 2 C (N) • 2 Lane Callectar 2 L • 2 Lane Local O.ASS 4 l'IA -- - -- EXISTir«i C V 44.S 11.6 ----- ---- ---- ACCESS NO SOl'E NO SOPE YES NO Y[S V/C D.26 -- - -- FIIZ 1/ICELL Y RANCH A B B A A e LOS A -- - - B B C A e C BUILD-OUT a.AS!: C V 4 l'IA 44.S 30.3 4 l'IA 144.S ,e.:s 4 PIA 44.S ,a.1 4 PIA 44.5 13.S LOS A o.oo -a.so 8 o.s, -0.70 c o.7'1 -a.ea o a.a, -a.so E a.s, -,.oo V/C D.68 0.41 0.42 0.30 F NOT !IEANlNGFUL '· LOS B A p. A U.S.A. INC. -----------<, s-A) ooo 181 Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. criteria for all-way-stop controlled intersections derived from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Also shown is a tabulation of the total peak hour approach volumes including a three percent increase per year of regional growth for the intersections evaluated and the corresponding level of service. As shown, du~ing the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, these intersections are projected to operate at LOS A or B, which is in compliance with the City's performance standard. By inspection, the intersection of Tamarack Avenue/Park Drive is also projected to operate at LOS A or B since the peak hour volumes will be less than but similar to the 1ntersection to the west, Tamarack Avenue/Hillside Drive. 000187 -16 -Kellyrch/l8L --- --. Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Urban systems Associates, Inc. This study was initiated to identify traffic impacts which are likely to result from the phased development of the Kelly Ranch project and additional parcels within the City of Carlsbad Facilities Management Zone 8 and to determine what street system improvements mitigate the traffic impacts. This study also evaluated F.M.Z. a traffic generation with regard to the City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program circulation element performance standard. Based on this analysis determined: the following conclusions have been l. The phased development, with a projected buildout year of 1992, of the Kelly Ranch project and additional parcels within F.M.Z. 8 plus the area wide yearly growth, can be accommodated by the phased street improvements listed in Table 6 of this project. 2. The cumulative average daily traffic projected at buildout of the Carlsbad Fully Constrained General Land Use Plan can be accommodated, adjacent to F.M.Z. a, by the recommended street classifications shown in Figure 24. 3. The projected traffic impacts from the buildout of F.M.Z. a to the adjacent street system can be mitigated so that the LOS at impacted intersections and street sections conform to the City's Growth Management Program performance standard for the circulation element. 000187 -17 -Kellyrch/lSC Kelly Ranch-F.M.Z. 8 August 31, 1988 Urban Systems Associates, Inc. 4. It is recommended that Table, be adopted as part of the City's Facilities and Improvements Plan for Facilities Management Zone 8 and that the street classifications recommended in Figure 24 be adopted as part of the City's General Plan Circulation Element for those streets adjacent to F.M.Z. 8. '· 000187 -18 -Kellyrch/18C ..... \0 ) ) APPENDIX A ~11 l)iq!o .\~-.CH"l.\llO\ or C,C I\ 1:-U:\~ll:~·r:-. ...... !. .. • "'9 .... 1, ...... , .,. -~, •• ,.,1,.#fl .. _. ,...!'_. c.. .,., .... ,:-1.:u .,, .. :l'\J~-.. BRIEf GUIDE OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION AH.Y , ... IIOTI n .. ._ 11NW .......... • 11!!9 el.-... ., tlhfft■u•. ,,.nae: .. .._, .. ..-, .... le, le~., .. , 1...-... ... •• .,...,. fft4..._.._ .. .... ....,.,, ,,. .... ..,. o ......... , ....... , ... , ........ IO, ... ,. .... 1,,,. ..................... ,.1M,ce111A ............. N loul ..... , .. ......... f• ,._. ...-.1.c ,_..,.,.. .... ,.._,.,,., trau,, ••• 111d .... , ..... .,.._ .. ,.,., .. lfl• N11 o..,... f1•l•-c GM••••.,•...,__, ~ ._ ...... ._., ,..1..doel.,_. ... .,.__, ,-1.,, .. Of •PPllc.111,t fllM lAl•IIII --·--·· -~ .... ~ ........... -.. -.......... , .... t ...... ,.0,,,.,. ... .,.,,.,,.. ~-.,.,,..... ... ...... ,,.., o,. ..... °'-'r ... - ~ .......... c-.... , ....... ,,...,,,... C..,-1111 flilllo,1 ...... JO -•ft ........... .. )00000--. h .• ,,.. .... ,. J• -.,oru""u• ~.,,.._.....,,_,c..., ... ltOJC....,••· tOOJIID(,-JOtl.M ...... , ...... , •• fft ..... , ... ........ , ........ ...., .... .. ~.., ....... .,..c. .. ... llftl tto, ....... , ...... .... 1111&1 000 IQ It . •I•~•, ., ••. ,"'"'••we• ... •• c.---, ... 51'14IPI ......... c.-... , .... G,,-~•·-· c.,.,-..-c•"••et --· '""""''""' ...... l"9\«-1, .. , ._....,,,,,,,fllltl1•• G,.,""'"'-1,,r••· -u,.w., ••• , ,. ,..,., ......... c .. , .... , ...... " ... "'~ .. ~,.-.---" ..... ............ , -·--.. C••••••ac•11,111i1.,,,,,.. 111111.lllD WIIIDAY VIHICU HIGNUJ PUK HOUR II lol.,IH:OUJ nuol 11UP GlNIRAHON RAU a, .... ,, Jt A II. I,,_,. Ho f.11 ,,_,, .. u,.,., 100/tht"'I. JOIIDOO •• h •• ..... 41 1, 1• II 41,,,. ,µ1,,,,,,_ l/wM4tlf1'Cttlr• IOOl•u11•• IOQ, •••• _ 60llo••··· ....... ...... , 1•0111•1,011 l)Olp-.•• ... II II 11 .. IS II 6,0HOOQ IQ II . 4001,c,,_ 601 .. nnCAI ...... ...... ,os. tt" 00 l(\001q11 1000•,u•• .. ..... , J1 .-. .... X\O'IN'IOIQ II ·~'1C•1· ... 1111 ,0 .. 11,, )£1(\l~Ju,y ••tl•I•.....-• J,tl ,1 .,,.,,. JO I Du'.' 1,41 II (tOIJ 1(11•• , .. . .. 100.!ta ........ , .... ,.. •• . .. .. .. tJ.cu• 1•110001• h .. IOlt,1:tt•• tu ... 1,1H t'I. ti JI I'-H, 1,,I ••• l11f'CH, .......... ·••""'"'"' WJIIWJ1q h .IOOl.:H• 1t. ti )I ., •• !lot JOIIOOO 1q h . JOOlac11• u J"' ,, .. ,.,. ...... , IJO, 1000 tel h . IJOOl.c:11• •• 4'11. II 41 11-.15 II • ,,.000 •• ft .,oo,., •• J ...... "ti II IW>'IOOO 1C1 h. UOOlac•t• •• Jt.U )I .. _ _.,, to0 10.lU 1q h • • flt II" ... ,, 11 JOIIOflO 1'1 t1 lOOi•ut• •• , .. 16 41 "'' ·~ .. , 111000 1q ••. ,oo,,u, .• "'·ti .. , , .... 51 ,o,10u:> •• ,, . )001.c,,•• I> II 41 , ...... 6011000 1q h. MM)1a,c,,•• l.._ Ii ti ...... u '°' •OOO ,ca ,, • I 20,1<r1• • JI, " •• 10"-ti 11 1 l&fuOlflf 1001,cr!" 1011-II U ... u,, I ~,.,,,,,_,., ta:"',~ IJ'l,.ff, II ... tJ ,. , ,, .... .,. ... !,O, ..... 10'-•• ,, ,., tJ ,. I 0,11-,Clfnl 4101•••• • Jn. II 11 ,,.u,, I 4111 .. 1.N:AI &,01.:•1•• )61, ,, .. '" u.>, JOtt,,,t ,o,,ooo .... . 2001.c,,• ,,__ .. , . U'lrtt, IJ J1 l,wa•• .... h 10 ... ,1 UfllBEJ. A.GlhCtl~ Ch• yl C...,,,1__.. Ct, .. ,., V,u .. ("'''"'"''"• Ou 1/.-, fl f .,,,..,,_ l~&,,•U•tu_ ....... , • .,, lu .,.,, l. r:,, .• l1•1t~t1 (,.,,,,. 1-1.1 1,n.i C It Ou_.,,, 1.11 tu.· . .,, ~~ (j,'-h"• !,.,,, l.l~e;ul t,.,., ... , V1,I• ..tllf ( t,hr,1, ••• :,_., l.t . .,,., AO\'IS~lll 't"' LtA1SO•• \~(1.16( n~ c ........... CJ.,,.,, 111.,. ! .... ,, .. ,.~,,c,,1 .. hull us 04J1o1•Cnh I of o~,. "~' .,,,J l,,.,.,.,_ 1, .• ,.. C: . .1.,..,.,.,,. , • .,. .. . ............ t:,11n1_.,,. ... ,"'..,.,.,1...,,..n••• 16: 1000 HI h . JOO,ac••• U" II JI 11' ti It NnCnot1t"'"''..I 10° IOUll •'I It. l201ac1e• U\, II )I ll'li II 1, M•u.,f.._t..,fftflAt ....... , 411000 Ill U. IQl..:11•• JOI. II II IOI, •••• w., ... ou,.,,. l:IOOOtq h.lO.ac11•• 15' It II »,.01, t,,nrai,11 1,1000 M k. I •. ,..,.. »tc••· ,., 11 II ..... ,. 1,c-,.,., ........ , .. ,0 ............ , 111000 •• It · '°'"'· • ,, .... " 14• II ti Adlft ... t1lr•11G11/C.,IIJOllll•H......,_,l.,I JJtOOO ~ h. IOU,acte•• ........ ....... LIIN_,W 40l 1000 Ill ft • 4001«••• • 1 .. 11.,, '°" 1111 Lodto•t Ho11I ...,t,onveftl•OA l•fhl .. fll&o,llffl .. C .... IOl1.-,n. :JOQlac,.• •• I\. ti 41 p. ,,,. UDl•I 10hOOftl, JOOIM•I• •• I\. It II f' II•• ....... ...... ,o,,oom. 100,ec,1•• ... It •• ti. o4 ,, Mit,t.,y 2 i/nuhf••• I C•""tM __,...,_.,. ... , ... IOI, &J II 01h01 , .... , ... c....,..11,-..1011-c, JUIIOOO III h • lOOi«••• IU,1111 IJti. IJ I, 1t.u 1111,n 100000111 It I l••1"' th•-,h 0111 Com•IMltMI OH.Ct UnOOCh~ It, 6001w,,• IJI,, •I II ..... &J •• IAM.11t 1h•• 100 ODO.._ h..16 ••.,.••I -...,.,,._...,.,,c: ...... c ..... ,. JOIIOOR1q h •• ....... 1:tl. 11 II ...... ou.c, llOJIOOO 1C1 h. .. , .. 1111 ... ,, ,, 091'.,illftlfllelMel•V-IClft 110/1000 .. h. IOQ'tc••·· ... 1141 .... ,,,, ..... ..c .. toltOOO 1q h • 8001,cr•• f1' II II I"°' IJ II , ..... c,,,, ......... ..., .... ) ....... " .............. ,,~·-· •• " N••lfh"""A•o4 lt•u••• Aft>., .. m.t .. ,tl,..,..,11 .,, ..... ,._ .... Yltl ...... _.,,.. s.110,. .. , .. IIW-••• , ......... IOI.cu• AH•••lf.,. """'' 0c ........ ,, 60Ql1000 h "' ......... 60.•-··· ......... .......................... I0/1000 t1 '"°"•""•. lltc•• • ....... ..,,,,,, ... ,., )011 .... , Joo,.,.•· ,, U JI '"" " .. ,...._.,.~ ... 1111 .,, .... , ...... ... ... l1ntlt,;nw,,, ., ..... '°"''.._. ..... . .... ,, ,. h IJ t, .... , .... , ., ......... 1, "" 11 h ......... , ... ,,,,., • ..,,,.4:1wt, 41Ulloo.J •• h. JOOlec•e. 4Q;,..,,1• n, •••• ",, .. , ....... , ....... JOlco11•1•• ... ....... , . s,µ.,., l..c,1,1,.-1 o .. , ........... \MIi wa,.,, o 1, ... ,. ......... "''''" JO'"''' 011111f' A.-,., .. , •o,,,u, 0l,11••• , ...................... ltllU.AAJ•~ fl. I 11 ... ,• 0 II. ft U J1 R•1,ar,., .. 1 S,..,v&r f rlldi, lh•acflM IOlctw.ctt~t""''• 1, IJ 11 '°" ,1 J. le4••• tDu1-t1I Cond~,,.,.,... fo,, .,., ...... ti ............ ,,. • ., 1oou1-.,,1 ., .............. '"., .. IOI, 1, )1 Ar•••"tlll'f\1t fur ,,., t11uf11 ,...,.,.. •lllkl ,,.,_,M,n1wn11• h 1111 "' "J• ,.._., lh•" )0 OUl-••t l,lon. .. HQff'le ................ "''·.i,J·,-·· '" u ,. ... ,. ., flthttffll°'f ~uftllW' 4/dw,u, .. ,.,,.,,•• ff.,,,1 l11•1• u,.,.,.,o11.,11n,1•• Aeu,,..,,ann o ........ 10011000 t1i1 h . IOOI~••• •• '"' II It "11 JI $,tlk>-.,,. lufh111ttw1.e1 100,ux,111.,. h 11001111:1,••· ti. II II ., tt ,, '•"'°""'""''"'_,,..,..,.,., 10PIIOOO 14 It. >oOOi•••• •• 4-._ ti II ., •• t,, l11n,.,,..,., .... ,f_o1,1,•1 • ... o., ... JSIIOI.Xhq h •• 1,.,1.t. 11,n,on.l IOI IOOJ IQ h . 60.-••• • ." ... ,. . ... ,. ltlf,1UlfloO•I tJC1, .... ,," 1)1.c,1•• I••"''' l••••on IR ... t JDOl.c,,•· t4ti, 1J )I 11, ll It • '''""••• 1ou•ce S.n o .. ,. r,.u,c c.,,....,•!!!! ••om., • ., .. "•• U( r,,, G"'-, .. ..,.11.po,1 •••• G•"•""An 111., .. '°'"._ ••"''•••• •••·0u• 5AkDA6 1 C•. 111.ANI ,, ..... •-.o--,.• ''""' .,,.,,.., .. U.S.A. INC. FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 t 8/88 APPENDIX B LEVE!. OF SERVlCT. Nin IM'l'ERSF.CTION CAl'At"!TY UTILIZATION (lC'tl) Level of S•rvice i■ • term u■ed to deecri~ prevailing condiliona and their effect on tra!!ic. Broadly interpreted, the i..vel of Service concept d•notr~ any one of • nuaber of differing c0111binationa of operating conditions which may t•k~ place a■ a roadway ia accomodating various traffic volUIIIC'~. Levtl of Service i~ a qualitative fflf.'asure of the ef!ect of auch factors as travel ■l)e'ed, travel t1111C!', 1nterru~tions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving c0111£ort and convenience. Six i..vels of ~•rvicP., A through F, have ~en defined in the Highway Capacity Manual of 196~. i..vel of Service A deacribe~ a condition of free flow, with low traffic volumes and relatively hi9h speeds, vhile i..vel of S•rvice F describes forced traffic flow at low ■peed• vith ja-d conditions and queues which cannot clear during the green phases. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Nthod of inter■ection capacity analysis has been uaed in our studies. It dire~ly relates traffic de!!land and available capacity !or key int•r~•ction movefflt!nts regardless o! present siqnal timing. The capacity per hour of green ti-for ~•ch approach is calculated based on the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual. The, proportion of total signal time needed by each movement is determined and compared to the total time ava1lable (100 percent cf the hour). The result of sUllllling the requiraaents of the conflicting key movements plus an allowance for clearance tiMs is expressed as a dec1mal fraction. Conflicting key traffic 1110vements are those opposing move-nu vhose cOll\bined green ti111e requirements are greatest. The resulting ICU represents the proportion of the total hour required to accOIIIIIIOdate intersection demand vol-es if thi key conflicting traf!ic movements are operating at capacity. Other 1110Vt1rments may be operating near capacity or may be operating at significantly better levels. The ICU may be translated to a Level of Servic• as tabulated below. The Levels of Service (abbreviated froc:: the Highway Capacity Manual) are listed here vith their corresponding ICO and Load Factor equivalents. Load Factor is that proportion of the signal cycles dur1ng the peak hour which are fully loaded: 1.e. when all of the vehicles vaitlng at the beg1nning of green are not able to clear on that green phase. - Level of Service Load Factor guivalent ICU A• (free Uowl 0.0 o.o -0.6 B (rural design I 0.0 -O.l 0.61 -0.70 C (urban des1gnl O.l -a.J -0.11 -o.ao D (111aximwn urban design) 0.3 -0.7 O.Bl -0.90 E (ca~cityl 0.7 -l.0 0.91 > l.00 F (forced flow) Not Applicable Not Applicable SERVIC!: 1.EV'EL A There are no loaded cycles and !ev are even close to loaded at this service level. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. SEP.VICE: t.rn:L B This level represents stable operation where an occasional approach phase is fully ut:1.lized and a substantial nul!'ber are approachinq Cull use. Many dri•1ers bcg1n to feel restricted within platoons o! •"ft"icles. SERVICE LEVEL C At this level stable operation continues. Loading is still intermittent but 1110re frequent than at Level B. Occasionally drivers may have to vait through more than one red signal indication, and bac~up! may develop behind turning vehicles. llo!'lt drivers feel so=what re11trictr.•j, b~t r,'.:lt objcctionat,Jy so. SEPVlCE LEVt:L n This level encompassc~ a zone cf incr•asing restriction approachinq instability at th'! intersectl.on. Delay!'. to approac!ling vr:h1cJcs may be substant1«l durinq short p•:a~s "Within the pc:-•~ hc.ur, but enouqt, c,cl-.~ 1o:ith lowc•r dr.mand occur t.o p .. r1n1t pcr1od1c clcaranc,. o! queues, thu~ r,rc•,cnt1r.,; exccr.si•1c backup~. Llr1vcr~ frt:qucntly hav,-to wait through more than on,, r•,d i::11nal. 'J'h1i: level is the lo-.,cr lim1t nf accer,tal:.lc operation to "'°'" driv,-r:":. SERVICE LEVEL E This represents near capacity and capacity operation. At capacity (lCU • l.D) it represents the 1110at vehicl•• that the particular intersection can acconnodate. However, full utilization o{ every signal cycle is ■eldom attained no Matter how great the de-nd. At this level all drivers wait through 1110re than one red ■iqnal, and frequently through several. SEJIVICE LEVEl. F .Ja-d condition11. Traffic backed llf• from • down■trean, loc■t1on on one of th<• ■treeta re11tricts or prevents -v•11rnl of traf!ic throuqh the inter,u,ction und••r consideratl""· FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -20 0001'. .. --· Page I of 33 APPENDIX C . . IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS -· . ICU ANO LOS CALCULATIONS .. (EXISTING -BUILDOUT) FMZ B/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -----------000111 -21 - N N 3/88 ........ ) . I I ~ , ---- I ... I I -'-·~·ty IJl'nla:l'ICl9 CANoCffl lfflLDATlm ........ I UL.-I Pa11 2 ,r 33 --\ I I T,. .... ll•cw .v, ..... AT 1',o ,, •• "··~• ,,., ,, ..... ,. 11,cllAt1Na~, ... , .. , 'li ........ ,a,:, •• ,, •• ,,., 'Ii. ,-,;.•• .... ~,... ,, 11 , .... , .... ,c .... ~---·••c. -- ,.,., ........ , ... _ .,.. ..... Jmn: ::n~1;111tiitiWH1 ---···---:-: •·••• .. ••tlN c.,.•llf Ullllull-• -of C,lllwl -.. FMZ 8 fLY RANCH 000181 N w ) - .... -. l I .. , .. -- , ....... inaaa:n• cu-.r:m ln'ILUln• AMLnn ___, T,..,.,_a.,.c:w .. ~ ...... e .,T 1"10 P,co oa,,,, ,,. Ao.«,,,,,_ 6a1T..,_; ~ M,.., 811-<f'iU),r ,U'S ····- ) , ........ P191 J of 33 \ I I , -- ,,,,.,.,,... .. ....,. I ... T....._,,l'J,....,,._ 11,~cn••l s4"' ····- 61Aternctl• Capacllr UUlluU• --•• CrlUul -- FMZ B/KELL Y RANCH 000187 "' A ) - ........ ~ , . l , -·· •... ,... wm• cuu:m ffll.lRnm MIUIU ...... TA,-u~l"-cw Aal•w"'• Ai-1' •,o ••C• 0•1.v• I\ 16, fh.l Ji. ,wc••A•I , •• ,,,, f\.-1 IJ, 1wC11•A1• ....... ""'•• . , .. ....,. ........ 14'1'•,-.,I~---' ••I-(1#•J.a).-,,1 ··•-.... .,.. ..... FMZ fl.LY RANCH (u1. ,-: Pae• 4 ,r 33 .. , -- ........ , ... - nQOtBT ) N -~- ICU Ut. A .,, ... C•••tltf ,cu J 5.:, •IO -.-s;;-...... "11 8So ,54"& ,\'It '""' r ~.,..~ _., ~ -,,. +{•n--lt .,c -..... _ 1 ltc· ~:- Ton.L ,U .. .. .. • ·o I • .. u ~ M••• I) ., 0, " "' ~ ICU Alt. c1,1c11, t-'-0 I ICU ( L €A••t111 •,•L.1T•••••c. ec. •"• ,~,,n • .-,.,, ... ..n:. ,,~,1--i. JHtAIAt,C" ••• ,.._,, .,.,.1, at • ~ .. , ... ,. ,, rr• ,.,,,. • ICU Alt. C ...... c,,,cu, ,cu 1- l .O.t. C!, l .O.•. l.O.a. ... .... 1,,tt... .. ..... ,,... "'"''"'" ---------fi!sil--------- . 111, -It,_ •-1 J • 151 ICU J.11, A ...... c,,,cu, ICU .. ) 17 ,I& "js';c .. .. t1 ,' , '\IL ,,., f.ii;' r 1.:,-1 . '" IS"OO .,: .. -' 117 .,o •~ II ,., .. ..... ToTI\I. • 5 'l 0 ~ ! • ., C u .. .. ICU All. Mevt c,,,,11, .. \, ' • ICU r.1, 5 ,, 33 If l ":•r-•••., a. 1•'-/"fa,.,•••":" • "'· _.,,,. , ••••. ~c.. .. .r, ·•-:.. ~. 'lw~••••• ..-•• 1•11 a.1.1 1·1. , ... c• , .. ,,, •• ••It ICU Alt, C ...... Cepecllr ICU a.0.1. I-I .0.1. 1.0,t . .,, .,,......... ............. ... ........ .. ----------WSAl-----,.----- ,.. •• .,. n ,,,,-·,, V nil~lrU 000187 Patt 6 ,r 33 fL '-"""•No •~AL/-r•,.••Ar• ••r fL ,••••~ ll'IAl/••••'"'""•I .. .... "(lltA '2 ••• TA◄'" 11. r'-61 ;ll,•Jtt'f "'" I ,r~•· ...,.~,, .• , • .,, C -.. ... Ill \ .. """.' ... C ... 1,.:t't" '"""'''C • ,. ,. . .. '!' ,. .. ,,,. ........... • , ... "',.,, "'""' 'IANA■AC■ ,.V!NUI 'JANA■AC■ AYINUl ,o ,.,,., ,,, ,~, JO 8~11 916 162 l'Jro '71, .. ... \, ~ .. ~ .. ,.. ~ ~ !: " ~ N •O ... ~ :> .; '°' ! .. t;i 0 ' • .. "' ! -. -C .. C, u • C .. u .. .1 tCU Alt. A ltU A II. • ICU Alt. C ICU lit, ,. ltU Alt. • ICU -It. t ...... c.,.su, ICU ...... C•p•cllr ,cu a.1 .... C•••cllr ,cu ...... c,,,cu, ,cu M••• c.,,cttw ICU ., .... c,,,cu, ICU /JU , .. s, • "l'3-ii;"o L 71 "isoo .10 ... , ... ., Jll.. \SOC • ,o..,.,.,, ltt/ IV~l. . ~ "l SIP() ---~ . ,, "'"" ,,~· -::;-_!ll_ .I I -" ,~-,o 7F JU+llf ,I I "\('('<" ~--~ ., !. '"Jo,,..'!\ -r,...-1 ... 1.. ,1 '1 'T'<fll,L .1' l.0.1. C:::: l.C>.I. l,0,1. ... .......... ,. ........... ,. ., ........ .. --------[~SA)-------- 1.1>.1. C l .0.1. l.l>.1 . ~.,_._ ... _,_,_._,_._ .. _._" ______ ... _._._' ._._. iV s A)-----"'-'_'_'._._ .. _._ .. ____ __ FMZ JELLY RANCH }000187 ) r rn .... fl( t t ,--' -- " t • ... C I) t-u ;: ~ -,.c - •rll\' ••"'' ~ f"LJ ''''J 4 I'll ~ §Is ~ 1.3 I ~ N ..... -.J Ill .. I. ~ ICU All. A ICU All. 8 ., .... Cepeclly ICU ...... C1pecllr ICU ' 11r •IO ISi'• .,;. '1t ,~· ,,,. "£· ., ,: 1410:: __ ,. ~ ., 0 I~•• .... - TPT.-L • 45 t .0.1. ,4 t .0.1 ... lllll1•t1•• .... , ... 1.11 USA (!!ffi . ) I'\ U IC'L\ fl ,,.,,,.,r •••"/l<ELLY D£••C \'\ (ia, ,...,.rFt< t'; .. -,T. Pl■I f. i. J..,t •••11 lrll1,,, fl-.1 ,-;, • I .. ,• I .... .,,.a ,'\ •· """ frJ>~\-1.:> .. ._ 11o ICU Alt. C ....... Cepecllr ICU l .0.1. ........... 11 lllLLY D■IVE Ill @ . "'I !:! T ICU All. A ICU All. 8 Move CI p • c lty ,cu ._.owt Cepacllr ICU , " 117 7 (i;o . 1 "?> _J .£1.. .. 10"''" '""° TOTAi--~~ 'o I l a.o., . . . f' ....... 11011 P111 7 er 33 ,cree ,c .... f \. (,_., ur 'fl.4..( ... L\.\' ':,.I-••• 1 •. f I T;. • r I • < r r • .rr t, • ... '! ' •. ,,.,,, ... ,.~, ..... ,,,, .. , ... '!. ,~. 1"' ..... ~, ,., ... ,, flr,/\ pe:A"-\lOV::t.. 1-0 ICU All ., 0 •• Capecltr l .0.1. ............. C ,cu Ho Mlllt• II•• ---------[!'s{l-------- ,.. •.., .,,. ,,., ,-, , ,, n -4 ,,,.. ,-, '000181 I N co ...... /JU __, -,_ ' •tLL'f •alVI ICU All A c,.,c .. , ,cu '""' ,12 r.;;- 'lC, iioo ., ... ~ •·•M ... 111,o "TC,,a.l. -"' ..... .. 0 ~ ICU All. .,,_. c,,.,c,,, ICU , •• ,, ·-,,,,,.,,.,c ,,~. t••J''T Ta-Ft,c. .... '' ... "·-· .. C .. • 0 ! • • u .. .. ...... ICU All. C Capacllr ICU 01 lo. 1.0.1. ' A • • . . . . r• 111111111111 Mltlt•U•• • _._ .. __ ••-••-•-•-•-•-"-------[USA )1------------- FAfi' 1'11.L't D■fVtt: "" J#/7 ICU All. A ICU ... ,,. c,,,,11, ICU M1wt C ■p1cftr -' IS .,o,,. .... --.& ~ fH ~ ,4-'!. S1DO "1'Q"lt,L .S-:! l O , A , .o., . . . .. ..... , .... ICU P111 8 tf 33 I\. t"'A•• .. •• .. •L l•r• t, ••·•* ,,A, ~ ••• Tl~,,,, l"-S f••lf'•T 'f-llA''•C f.,. ,,,.,, ..... , ~ II • 0 • i C u .. .. ... ·-· ICU All t c11 ■c11,I ICU , .o.,. ............. ............... ---------U~SA)-------- '/Et.LY RANCH nl l!!!.J I ff1J IN I \.0 ., .... , -,,1, , _ I .. ,10 ICU All. A ...... Ca111c1tr ICU ,. I )0 . ,. I -.,-;:;. ... J.11 l'rf!•'l/; . ,, :, ire _,, _,CL •IO . I!',:: .... .,' • • 0, I • • u ;: ..... l 0.1 A. l.O I. ,- - rn ICU All. 8 Capacity 1111 .. ::. " ... Q ,cu r l r,..,,.,, lrAl /w,, I'(.~ (oNn,,..,.,,p ''"'"' l rl jl.tJ l #-H• D i'ff' 811•ll>r,7T A,.. ,, ,. I< ltr~II --•«•,1 vlll""''! ICU Alt. C Move Capacity l .0.■. Mltltall•" ICU •• Yltttallo" lllllta tlafl --------w~~.1---------- ) P111 9 et 33 r ~ t,c,,,,,..,,c •••L/•l\.'..'/f',..1-- "' .. (011-:_,•t•ul Lo "'•••If• ,.L r "' ,., ,-f'l • ,1 ~ 1-.,-:., 11! C e :.-~ ·...,. # • --- ~~ ~ p.,.. "'',, .. .. C"_,,. .,.t.1 .. •t '111,V.-;: 1.,-•cf · ••.,t.• C t ••I• ff lltllY l>IIIVI: I I, I I .. C .. ~ .. I 0 " ! ,o I • 0@ C u ~ '" .. .. , I ,,,, y ~ I . • ,,., -3611 II) ' I , I :Jno ... -,, I ICU Alt. A ICU I< 11 • ICU I, II C Move C•pacllw ICU Mo•• c,paclty ICU "•". Cop,clty ICU .. .-1£.L ,Ir I ISi"'> .. .. ,UJ Ill\• U/1 •)(. :. 'c-,· _J ~ •Iii:" •t=""~• .. , . 1(Tflt. . .. , l .0.1. ,. l .0 I l 0.1. ~• a,u11,.11 ... 11111,.11 ... ..,,,, ...... . USA 000187 ' w 0 ..... L ti' r ~ ICU lit. A c1,1s11, 11 .. l~oo 1'iett~ l"'0:1 ...Lfr._. \JC.O ~·'·~ l.4M _..._ ICU ... ,. ,\\ .1.., ,lO ,lO .. ,d, o.1,0 .::. ') ..... rl ICU Alt. I C1p1cllr ICU \ '\ <\O \ C:U... ('. tJ\ f'EA"'-\\,c,~11.. ICU All. C ..... Capecllw l.O.I. A l .O.f. 1,P.I. IC:U "' ............ fl ............ .. ........ . ._-------WSAI-------- P191 10 ef 33 l'\'\V \ C v... A,.,._ {l~A.K ,,_,..,.11.. ,t AO, ICU ~II. A ICU All. I ICU -.11. C ..... C1p1clti, ICU ... ... Capacity ICU ..... Capecllw ICU AJ 'A1• ~ .').& 'j-4«> ' -ws .14 ~ r ~ .1 '\ IS..>D -(.u-\ j:" .,o'"'"' ~ ~ ... .,., ,-.,1 ... .,, l.O.t. C 1.0.1. l.o.a. ... ............ .. ..... ,,.. ... ........ . --..:..--------l)!SA )----------- 000181 ' w .... I • ..... At ~ -~ r -, 0 ICU lit. A c., ..... 1&h~ ,A03 .1.-'5 ISOO ).Wf~ --•OO ns ~ '""ti'<Ti..l \ C\'\ \ \C'-' ~ t'. JJ',., l'f'"'-\.l t\o,... A.. ...... ICU •••. I ICU All. C ICU ..... c111u1tr ICU ..... C1puftw .~1 , 14 • II ,\1 ... • b'f l.0.1. a. l.o.a. l.0.1. ICU ... ............ y ............ .. ........ . ---------[tjSA\--------- ICU lll. A ..... C•pacllw Al Vi>1 !p 'l4X> ' ~ ISOO --1.:> t "-:.0 """ii"" "IAoO ' 1•0 ~ "To'l,.._ ICU All. I ICU "··· C111•cllr :2., ,(S .10 1-4 ..,. • 1.. \ . 1 s: ICU l Pat• I I of 33 \<{'I\ \C~ ,.._,...._ C)lfA"-. .-.:,_u,(.. C,&,JIJ,IJ ... /'F. L ,......,.,.,. 11 ....... ICU UL C .. ... c,,u11, ICU l.0.1. C l.0.1. l.0.1. .,. .,, .. ,...... .. ........ 11 ........... . ---------ljsAl--------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 P111 12 ti 33 l'tC\l. '< ~ A,-'\ !)EA"-~«... C".-.,J~ fl..v_./~L ,,.,,..,.,,. t. '"'- ''2. so >-t ~ •J \3 ~' ' ICU lit. A ICU All. I ICU All. C ICU •tt. A ICU All. • ICU All. C ... ,. c,,ullr ICU "··· c.,.,, ... •cu ... ,. Capaclli, ICU -1'cf ',y.a. .. ,s --:-J◄o<> r l'IS ISoO .n. .A! 1111 ~ n;-·~-? ,\1 "l. ") s ..... C•pacllr IC: U ...... Cap•clli, ICU ..... Capacl•r ICU 3.rs :i+ ... ~ AL 1S-4 il}_l ~-~;-.~2. -\l..;. t ll,'-2- .101\,11. ~ ~"" ..... 7s:>O • \S" r JU .'). "\ 1soo lc:TN-o,W ,-,"1">.L ll .'\ll 1.0.1. C. L.o.,. t.0.1. ... ........... . .. , ... u a,111,.u •• ......_ _______ (usA)--------l.C>,I. }) l .0.1. l.O.I. ,,. .,,.,, .... ,. .......... ,. .......... . '---------l_l!SAI-------- I w w ..... l tV (? -~ CA ICU lll. A c,,,,11, ICU ~ .'l'l 'ISbv ,a,\• "l" .41 , ... .,., .at!-, IOA.lw ~O<;>O ,4\St~ !f L "t"h°T>J. ,q4 ICU All. I ..... C1p1cllr t;-.. ~ "3tw sr s✓ ~ y- c;r ~ ,SI.._\- ICU .14 .A\ ,IO . \(, .~, c-.,._wtJ.;"' P.0./,;1. c-A.""'"'.° UI\L p. ,.,.. pi;; .... IL. \\->'-''- ICU All. C ..... c,,,c11, ICU l.0.1. f. l.0.1, 1) l,D.I. ... ........... .. ...... ,.. > .......... . '---------@SA)-------- ) . P11• 13 of 33 \q'\ 5 \ C\A.. ~'-ICM jU> /liL CAM..,.,.;. lll-.L '2.1$ D ICU lll. A ICU All. I ICU All. C ..... ca,acllr ICU .. .... C1111cl1r ICU ..... c,,.,,.,, ICU· ~ .,~ ~\. 11-> 1s'oo ,\1. ~ .\O,-tlk ,v l'lwtU_o/. . -ti I~ I~ ·"" -'f-400 v 'SIS sr ~ '1. ~ <~ 'l. 't _,. -IC\f t 11f.1 • lO,...., ~ ~ 1-WO ~ .,o - ,i::-\ .. 1 . qo \ C "l N. ~ t.0.1. 1) l.0.1. 0 1..0.t. .. ........... ft )' ............ ,,)' ............ _/ ---------[~SA)-------- ~u7 R/KFI I Y RANCH 000187 w A ..... i.-' lU ~ ----. (r CAIIIIOII ICU lit. A tu,acltr ..... ~ ~ .Jax, <1a"14"l•• 1'41.°C ~1.4 ~ •~""""l. ICU .t.1 .,o,. ... ,to • I "'4 ."7"'3> ·o ·! • C ,u .. .. ..... ICU All •• C1pac11, ICU f' l ,,.,,,.,,,., .. ~~I\L/r,. .. tJ • .,. ••Al, .,,_-c -i,,,. • .,. •• ,,,c ., ... c pa.,,,.r ,. •• ,,,c, ,,._,.. p,,.., "r"" ■OAD ICU All. C ., ... Cap1cllr ICU a.0.1. C a.o.,. t.0.1. ~•-•_ .. _,_,_1,_,_,_,_._ .. _____ ~_'_"_'_'_'rJsil----~-••-•-•-•-•-••-" ____ _ FM7 CANNON ICU i11. A ..... cu,u:11, 111/ .!!_).!_ Slo>O l!-J!.L .J ........ ~ J" n ---µoo fr-.Al.1.. .,.,_ T'1t"'-'-- ICU ,38 , I I . '' ,IS O,?I> 0 ! • C u .: .,,.,, I'\ In :i, f\ ICU All. I Capu:llr ICU Pa11 14 ,r 33 ..,"•1'''"' .... ,.,,,, , .... , ...... ,. .. - ICU All. C ... .... ca,,ctt, ICU l.0.1. C 1.0.t, LO.I. ,u .... ,,...... ., .. ,,.,.... ~•11, ...... ---------[USA)--------- ~l.L Y·RANCH J 000187 CAIIIIOII ,.,. I I J-Tr.l _ ,.,,,_,1A UI I Vl ., .. , ICU lll. a ..... c, •• ,.,, ICU AU ,,1, .... , . .,, -JloO =il ,_,... -,;;-.10_ r ~· ., &J ·~·· •i.i\ ..!:.-e ,, .. ,"-.,, -7 ..... ToTAt. .'lo .. C .. • 0 I 11 ~ .If ..... " l 0 ~ .. ICU All. • c1,1c11, ICU El (A,..,NP ~.,,-,-1./,,_~,,,-,fl.l. <rNS'TltlUH~i) &.iF.vr,al L,...,i) "sr 61ul l>o.,'T ,..,.. Pf,tl< 14o .. A'T .. 4'N .,,,i..,,..,s •oao -ob- .......... u ... ,.,, ICU All. C ..... C1p1cllr ICU - l.0.1. I:. l.0.1. l,0.1, .. .......... " ............ .. ........ .. '---------[USA)-------- ) P191 I 5 of 33 Et..<,. ,,.t.c ♦t "1../'~ •••:•. t,,. (.r u~,., .. u,( -C.lt•I •' -... 0 ~ l·&.1-11 ~.,,.,,._ "";.f Lw•_t.c~-C .. .a ••. , r , .., wo ... • , ,.,., . ", ....... •: • = r- S.u#C I· •""''--&C, J •,,-I! CANNON •ADD 5So 111 '"" 811 ,,.,_,. .ss • a ... ,,,. I I 0 .. 1"1SJ -31$1-)lSO 0 .. l: !! t I • ~ .. , C u If .-,..,),.o•" .. ,..T ICU lit. ,. ICU A II. • ICU ..... t ..... C1p1cllJ ICU ..... c,,.,.,, ,cu ., ... c,,., .. , ,cu l+ ..!t.L •I" ts .... ~ ... ffY II/fl• n4IJ ,J:, ~loo r ...J.!£_ .10 .. , •. ,, .... -.. , -~ .... ., • l.,; Tor AL :n t.O.I. C J.0_1.1 l.D.I . ....... I Ill ""'• ...... ... .. _._ .. _._._ .. _._,_._._" ________ ( l_JSA}------------- OOOtBT COLUOE AVENUE w a-, ..... }JJI ~ _J -- ICU au. ,. c, ....... ICU 101.:> .1. 0 s,~-o .,s,g_ .10~.,. IJoo:> ,~r: , .. ., I I'\. l"t. "f,C3o • ,or-A., . 'i,. .., C IU It 0 ! :II C u ., .... ·- ICU All. I c.,.cu, ,cu ...... lo • .h. a.o.,. l,D.I. ICU Alt. C C•••clt, ICU . . . ,-, ............ .. ........ .. ~--·-"_1_11_•_·_ .. _._. _______ [USAl----------- COLLEGE AVENUE ICU All, A .. .... tap1clt, ICU Jl 11 'ISi . ', 'Jioo' ., •• ,"'io'o .\._q_, _J ~ ISoO .,~ ~ ..!L 10 -l-400 . ,..., .. T ...... 1. .s 1. J -.. C 0 ! 2 • 0 ...... ICU All. I C1p1cllr ICU P111 16 of 33 1(}90 \C~ P.toll. f'FAII! ~0<11{1 ,,,1. .. ~ ,o y, ... ~ ., ..... !:I ,4 'lfe ''JO,._ ~-I!, ICU AU. C ...... C•••cllr ICU lOI A l.0.1. ,.o.,. . . . ............ .. ........ .. ,N_._ .. _._ .. _._._ .. _._. _______ [USAI------------ FMZ 8 '"ELLY RANCH } 000187 l "''7 87'1 I . ..... ca11acllr -IIU -:l<I"" ~ J.!!!._ ,, .. 1•T~l l.0.1. ... .......... .. • ::1 It .. > C ... ICU .,c . ,. C II C • C .. -· .·u A In II) " ...... ICU All. I Capac:11, l .O.t. ............. ICU ...... ,_ ......... ", ....... ,_. .. .. "/IA• •-• ""•••••--,,., "•Jt;1" nttr,.c ............... " e,, ICU All. C C1p1cllr ICU l .O.t. .,,,, ....... ---------fi!SA )---------- ) ICU All. A ... ... c1111cllr -"''" ,,u, ~ l'I•• r .J.! ', . ., i ll!. ,,,._ r,, T IIL a .o.,. ... ,u,, ....... ) P111 I 7 or 33 c•-•,. ._.,,,,.,,. • .,.,.,.. ,, .. , ....... ,,., , .... , , ... ,,. r ... "''•C.. ,. _,.,, -•-"' ~ ;·. -~ 11118 1---- 112 ICU ,1, .... .. ::1 i > C .. C 0 C • • ... ,.,_ •l8 · 76 C •cu All. • Move C1p1cllr l .O.t. .. ........ .. @Ej ICU .1111 C ICU .... ... C1p1cltr ICU ' L.0.t. .. ........ ,. ---------l!!_S~J-------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH ODO 1117 w CD u ••• -- i t.0.1. ICU Ill. A ca,acltr f .1.(. -;;;;- a, ~ •f""c,TAL ... IJltlt•II•" ICU .27 . ,. .... .,., A CAIINON IOAO 0 ,. ,., ... ICU All. 8 Cepacllr a.o.,. 11111,.11 ... ICU ., .. .,. ........... ,.,,,_, ,,,,,.,. w .,. ,. --,.,,.,,,,, ,,,,,_, r•.,•~r ,11t,,,c .... ,1110, ..... 1017 117'/ ICU All. C Mow• C1p1cllr t.o.e. 11111,.11 ... ICU --------IVS~)-------- FMZ' .. ~ • A ► .. .. .. .. ICU All. A ....... C1p1c1tv ICU -.ill..!r!J ~ ,.-~ • J'I r ..1iL ·•• ., .. - ~ ,o .r.; ., .. -·- -r,r~L • fill l .0.1. A ... Mltlt•H•" CAIUION IIOAD "" "' .. " ,. ICU All. • ....... C1p1cl1r ICU ;_· P111 18 1f 33 ,-al•··-...... ,.~ •• , ....... ._ • ..,,. 11•• r,~,, c. ,_., '"•1•,~ ·••"•"- -00- ICU Ill. ... ... c,,. .... , l .0.8. ............ C ICU ---------@Al:-------- fl.LY RANCH 000187 ! .. .. • 0 I a: .. w .. "° 0 0 .. • C .. ICU All. A ...... ca,.acltr ICU •~o , • .._ i::l.,cTS (1!, S'"'fof' '5 C.tJ "'''~ uollT°'ta t .0.1. A ... 1o11111,.11 ... Ill ;; ICU All. ... .... Capac:11, .... o ,.) ,:-..-,c_ l .0.1. ........... ,. "-~ II ICU ,,,.,-,w_,, •••IIJAl,.trr s.,e1.. ,.,. •• ,1 ,, ... ,.,.,.,. • .c. ..... J'~ Phtf fl. ..... , .. ,,,, ... , ...... , ....... , .. ,. 1 ............ .,. , .. ,,. r, ., ICU All. "'·"· Capac:llr l ,O.e. ............ C ICU C --------lus,;)-------- CANNON IIOAD .. .. • 0 ;;; a: M .: "' 0 "' .. • ' C ... .. ICU All. A ICU All. Mo11a C•p•cllr ICU Mo•• C•P•<IIJ No Co ► l<L,c,S ~ .;;:'f.'JI><,. '""'( , ... c. ••··•·nu, ..... -,,, '-.F,. t(. l.O.e. IU ..... I.Uta11 A t .o.•. .._ ........ .. ~ .. II\ II ICU ) P191 19 or 33 f 'lllt , ........ .., .,, .. '(.,, .. ,,., ... ""' ....... •• ,. ~ ........ , •• .J'f.,,.. #i. ,...,.. .... , ..... ,.., .... -. ' ,~c••••• .,., ,._,, ., .. ICU All t ....... t ■pec:llr ICU l .O.e. .,,.,, ...... ---------WSA)--------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 P111 20 tf 33 t'••-·"" ..... , .. , ••• ,. ___ .,, , ................ ,, ....... , ...... .. "' .. 'f#JJ• ,_, •• ~11A,,,, ,,~, .. ...,, .. ,, ., .... .,.,.,. .,. C. • • ,·~· 0 ~ .. fl••,,,,-r1t•r1,c 0 ~ 2 I': ,~.,,,r ru __ ,c ~ ... .. n ... ~ .. .. ~ .. ''" ..... -1( 0 ,,... ,,A.,"••• 0 CANNON aOAD CANNON ■OAD 11 '"" 1r1 ,11 ,,,,, ··~ ,,, U,2 ,,. .. ,,,,, 9,V 1'-"s-11,s ,_.. " • .. ~ ~ ... f A I .. t t-0 • " 0 ~ 'O .. .... .. .. .. .. .. <C -: • ecu lit, A ltu All. • ICU Alt. C ICU ..... A ICU A II. I fCU ,. It. C ..... c,,.cu, ICU ...... c .... ,, .. ,. ICU ...... c,.,,c11, ICU ..... C1p11c1tr ICU ... ... cu,,cu, ICU .,,.,. C1p1cllr ICU -' ..!..C-. '" U'PII ... , ~ ,,1 IC:•o ~ ,,, .. ,,,,. ·21 3"-,t I ... "'"• .,. ~"·• .... 1 ..... ~ .,, _, .,.u:J.. ,Jc> IS"• ,iJ ,,. .,11. .,. ,.,,. ..;_ ~ 6•~••ot';a, •.2$' -~ T•..-"'--71 ToT 11\. ,81 a.o.•. C LO.I. , .o.a. ... ............ ............ ... ........ .. ---------W&A)-------~ a.o.a. D LO.I. 1.0.a. ~N_._ ... _ .. _._._._ .. _._ .. ______ ~_·_·_··_·_·r~tA}-----~-·-·-·-·-·-·-··-"----~ FMZ 8. fLY RANCH 700 f87 Pat• 2 I or 33 ,,..,,. • .,, ... "uJ ,_."••ut, ,...,..ff .. ,.-......... , ,~., ... ,, ...... .. .. ftwn•,,,_,,..,D e,-.•• "1. .. f--.,rt,.,,.,,.L • .. .., ,,,, ... 0 t\l!aw L-ANO .... ,, , ... ,.,,._r 0 II -a: .. .-: ,.,.,,,, . """" _,, C•·• .,_._.,. .. • .... ,,,,, ......... ,.,.. ~ ~ ... ~ ~ '•"""' ,,,.. .. .,,,,,:, ,..,. 'IAN #t,flld ,,.. """"" ..,, _, CANNON •oAD CANNON IIOAD 1•0 ,,,,, ,-~ ,.~ , . .,, ,, ' 111, l8U ,,., ,,,, ,rs 9,., ,,,, "'"' .. ~ IC : Q I'-,.., t .i:. -'-"r ~ I • ... II " -0 ' "' :,•n __ ,.,$,_1,rr ~ • I ., .. 0 " • ... I ., ,. ltYlt-•• .,.,_,.,, C • .. C I ,n, .. - ICU .... A ,cu All. • ICU A tt. C ICU lit. A ICU A tt. • ICU ..... C ..... Ca11atllJ ICU ...... C1111cltr ICU ..... c ••• , .. , ICU .. ... c, •• , .. , ,cu ... ... c, •• , .. , ICU .,,.,. c,,,111, ICU __, ,,,. .,~ l51JO -i ... , •1., iJ;;; ~ .,,, ..... ,,, .,. . -.. ,, .. ~, ,, I 1111, ., . ,., .. ....: .. -. ..!U:!-... ., ,, .. _) ..!.U.. ."l.0 ISO~ ,U , ..... ,,. ... JWr• ...... ~ ,., ', ..... .,s -114"' ~rT/' L .,, .,-., T/1 t. .a'l. 1.0.t. C 1.0.1. 1.0.t . ... .,,.,,..... .. .... ,1,,11 ..,,,, ....... ---------['!SA)--------- t.0.t. 'l'\ I .O.t. 1.0.1. ... ,..,.,,...... .Y ..... ,...... .. ........ .. -----------WSA)-------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000181 21, Jo7 I A N ICU All. a ...... ca,ullr r ,, --I.I•• -,,, •••✓, -:-!II.I•• l. ••11 ~ ICTAL .. • C • t 0 0 I: g .. s: £ 0 • ! ICU •IO ..... .,. •.. .,1. 1 . ,,, ..... ~ ICU All. e C1p1cllr ICU l'llif IC~ (,.,..,,._. kr,.~/ l•C' (1.14 ,,,,.,.,.,, .,,, ,.,. .. ,.,,&. ,.-..n,., .. , ,i .. 1NCC ...... fl"I ''11 f••• • i'. ,.,, ..... , .,. ... , ... ICU All. C ...... C1p1cllr ICU 1.D,I. A l.o.,. l.0.1. •• 111u,111111 11111,.11... .. ........ .. --------(USA)-------- FMZl .. I[ < • ... .. 0 D s: ::, D • J: .. ::, 0 • -CANNON ,L :J ,,, 316 )1 J' ICU All. A Move c1p1cltr ICU u C. r i'ioo •lo ..,~ --:P~ ~1''1 •IC ~ ,'4•• .. l. ...!..f!.. I£'•• .,, 'ToT/1 L -:?f ~ II ~ ai ~ ~ ICU All. I ..... C1p1cttr ICU P11122tf33 \'\Fi 1c"i (&111•1v ••l\ ,r,f f.'I ••-•S ,I\,,,.,"•< ,,_ .. ·a • ·• _• ~. ,-,••~•• 'ir' . ..,,, r,.1 • • 1••····· .... ,., fJi,J1. ,~ ,AK. .. OU~ aOAO $S, &- ICU Alt. C .. ... c,,,,11, ICU t.O,I. A i,o.,. l.0.1 . ... Mlll1•U•11 ..... ,.... 11111,111111 --------(IIIA)-------~ 'fLLY RANCH JOOO 181 ) c:111111011 137 s,, ICU All. A ...... C1p1clly ICU Mow• _J F~ •IC ~o .. ,~ -i .£1-•IC •ro. .. ~ .A-5~ ••-1\'1 .,o --~ ... ,.,. Tc"r.4L -~O l.D.I. A l.O.t. ICU All. 9 C•p•clty ICU ,._.,._, • ..., ~,-,t1,b/ l•~ M/• tllA.,-.tt, \,f, T••''•C t••M'l'f 'kill 4 J. 1 .. ,., .... , •• ,,,, ~ ... , ,>. '1...,r«1••1 P,~ l'lil. ·■0111» ,,s ICU All. C ...... C1p1clly ICU l.O.t. .... , •• 11,11 ... ........... ... ........ .. '--------(UIA)-------- CANNON ... 1£ ,. C .. • ... 0 p II! :, 0 • i ICU All A Move Cep•c•h ICU Mow• _j ..!.!lt. I Si"o ·11 ~ , ..... '"'\11 .,o ... --:J II O• M•~ \ ..IL .,o ,~oo "•M "1'u1,H . ~, l.0.1. ,._ l .0.1 . I., ~ ICU All. I C•o ■clly ICU ,r., ..... ,., •c-•-11•1 ,,,,, ··-·· •• .,, .... ••••c.CP••rs •••• •:. t .. ir.:f-.\f f",1111:f\~'1 P1.-I .~. , .. ,.~-,, , .... ,, ,.,.,.. ,r: .... ~ ..... ,,__ ■OAO J lf 100 :,u· ·4 ICU 4lll C Mow• C•o•cttr l .O.t. Mlll••II•• ICU .. ............ 11 ........... 11 --------(VIA)-------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 1.1..o ICU All. A ..... cu,actt, L ..£1!.. ISCO r ~ IS'-t:> --i.,.,. l.,t -"J-4cr ~-,-1\L I.D.I. ICU • '\1. • 1. ".!, .,o ,b<:. ICU All I Move c,p1c11, ICU ' \<l'\c 'c .... c ,._ ........ p..o.j r-5 S·S OFF A· t-A-~I,(_,,_,,,._ G -s . .,~ .. n, ......... ) ICU Alt C .... .,. C1p1cllr ICU L.0.1. l.0.1. .. 1111111111 Mlt111t1111 ... .......... . ---------[USA)-------- FMZ E ICU Alt. A Move C1p1cltr _J ~ 15'1•' ~ ASS• J.ll --:( ~ '"S"L<> ,-,:T/\l- 1.0.1. ICU ,lt>M•~- • I 'f , 10 .~, ICU All. I ..... C1p1clli, ICU Pat• 24 or 33 C1>~».:1.1•0 /r•5 .,_,·t.c,Fr l>..M f>£ ""'-,,.,.,..__ ( H,c,.:,., Ai:1T ,.,,i__.) ICU All C ..... Capacity ICU l.0.1. l.0.1. IM1tl11llo11 Mlfll•lloll .. ... , ....... . ----------(UJA)-------- fLLY RANCH I ooo 1s1 I!. t>. t .b,. u, ... ,,. -~ r L ICU All. A Capacllr "571>~ 3~ l.<H IS.00 ..ilL ,s.,., -r;. "t1'L- l.D.a. ........ ,.,1 •• ICU l'Z. • t '1 • \b .P II. ~ ti' V, V} ' '"'. Mow, ICU All. I Capecltr ICU <"-"'"~"'-Ofr-5 S-1!,CFl: f'. M. fl<A,;1. \v•-- ICU All C Mow• Capacftr ICU ) . I ICU All. A Mow• C ■p ■cllr ICU _J :no ,\8 ~ ~ .&.Ht-IP'-• "l. "l. ·-,( ""I 1,,-1 ~ .\\, ,o,-N. • 5 l, LO.I. A l u 0 ~ . 2 Ill Mow■ ICU All. 8 c~p ■cllr l.0.1. Mltlp ■IIOII ICU Pa9125tf33 l<\<\C IC'-1. P. M Pc /\.1~ 1\.;.ul? ICU All. C Mow ■ C ■pacltr ICU l .0.1. .. ........ .. .. ........... . ---------(UIA)-------- 000187 CA»IJ,)1-1 1to /r-s .s-~ ex:;: A.,-;... p,u~-~ t\.:>\A a. ti) I" ' ~ ~ °' ICU AIL A ICU All. I ICU All. C ..... C•pacllr ICU ... .,. C•p•cllr ICU ... .,. C•p1cltr ICU L 5"71 . n ~ -l.A-• • l.f/1. .... 'l~1n ,ID"'"' r .11,J • l.f =-- -r ...... L. .71 a.0.1. C Lo.,. L.0.1 . ... Mlll1allu .......... 11 ....... , •• 11 J --------[VSA)--------A'"' ICU All. A Mow• C•p•cllr _J '.~ _.!lo.. ilU:"<'YL -~A,)C) ,., r ').f.s/.a. '\ •<oo -·•(\"I\I- l.0.1. tt ~ ~ ~ Ir> 4 ICU Mow• .l~.,u . • "1-1, .,o,...., ,◄\ ICU All. a C•p1clty ICU P•t• 26 •f 33 \'{'\\ \Cl'\ /4...M. {'£A>< ,~u-t 0..1.11 .. 01-1QO /-r•StJ-'!:, oC::F UJS ICU All. C Mow, C1p1clfy ,cu A t-0.1. L.0.1. .. , •• .,,11 .......... .. Ne Mlll11ll•11 ---------{trlA)--------, .... ,., FMZ )ELLY RANCH 000187 ) \qq\ IC'-\ f./J-. ('r-A\l. 1\.:>ulL AtJ>k>IJ o.o/r=-S S,' .. oFF na, ' .b, _., . - ICU All. A ICU All. e ICU Alt. C M•v• ca,acttr ICU ..... Capac••• ICU ..... C1p1cltr ICU l U,o 'If) ISoo r _1$ I ,'l. "l ~ -,f,t11.fl'L ~ '"tOO .14 -r; if A/... ,io l.0.1. C l.0.1. l.O,I, ... ........... ........... .. ........ 11 --------(IISA)1-------- Pa91 27 ,r 33 \ 'l'\I \ ( '-\ C A1,h.J~.., 1/.o /r-5 >J-l,.:,:.= f'.M Pr>-"-ruu1. lltS 10 ll ~ (l! ~ VJ l\ ICU Alt. A •cu All • • ICU AIL C ..... Capacllr ICU Mova C1p1cllr ICU ... ,, . C:apacltr ICU _j ~l.1 ~ .2.1 ~ S,14, • .,L ,11 -?.4oo .-..r 1~ ., 'f 1'00 --rn-rAl. • £& L·o·•· L.0.1. ........ 11 .......... 11 l.O.I. .............. ---------(U'IA]-------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 '.b, 0) ..... l -~ ' ICU Alt. A c-,ullr (;l~ ,s;;o ').(. , ... 11/.._ 3'4c0 ,441 ;c:~ ... ""{",)"'l"-L ICU All. I ICU ..... Capaclti, ,,f 1. .10-..,11, ,1,0 ,i2. ICU CkNII~"' AO /r-s S-'-A=,::. A-""· FE.Al~ \UY CL ,s l. ICU All. t ..... c,,,1:11, ICU ,.0.1. ,---. . L.0.1. 1.0.1. ... ............ >' ,......... .. ........ ,. --------(USA)-------- FAfZ l Patt 28 tf 33 \({£\1.. \CU.. <lsN~<" AO /r~S .,.11,cc,= A· t,A,' fii!!A.l ... .:.'-\fl.. c:: ,.,_"' '-'.-.., AO ICU Alt. A ICU All. I ICU All. C Mova Capacllr ICU Mo•• Capacltw ICU Mova Cap1cltr ICU ~ '!i'U+ •lljJ.. -.,,,.,.,,, .'15 _,,I-"~ ,/()MW, ♦ ·.( ~ ,li>,-.,A• .. _ -r.,,l\t. ,-1( l.D.I. A 1..0.1. L.0.1. ... ........... .. ........ ,. .......... . ---------(VIA)1-------- pLLY RANCH 000187 ) C. ICU All. A ... ,,. c,,ac11, f ...l!!-1soo L 100 -;t:;:;--,tf-'lt •"12- -<" -.,J£v> --(",TAI.- ICU All. a ICU ... ,. C1p1cltr ''),,S ,,41 ., (' ' .\1 ICU I 'lU. \CI..\ CAIJll,)1-J a.11./i:-S ~6.~ p .M · PeA•'-1-1.,.,411... '7 b I s ICU All C ... ,. c1,1cllr ICU l.0.1. r."I L.011. l.0.1. ... ........... y ........ " .......... " --------(USA)-------- P191 29 of 33 \qcn \C."\ <'AIJIJJII « () /r • S N -~ C,FI:" P.f\-~Ail. 11,.)u«_ ICU All. A ICU All. I ICU All. C ... .,. Capacllr ICU ..... Capacllr ICU ... .,. Capacltr ICU __.J 3,S!_ ,'l.4 IS,c,o ~ ~ , 1.'t -""-• ·.( {,1(/i... ~ :l\ T.:,Tf.).1.-.'14 ,,--l.0.1. l.0.1. ~ ........... ..,,1,111111 ---------(VIA]--------- l.0.1. .. ........... . FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 000187 fCU A It. A ...... c ■111c1tr -14.'{ --1 ""°" Yr , ....... ,, _:_..- "}ve--C' /" 1<1 l ,.,_., ~ ~L ICU .~I 10 ,,~,.w .1 I t I I i .. ! Mow• ICU AIL I C ■pecllr ICU c_· ... HN~., P.0/T-'5 ._._~°'"f 'if",._A 'lDO() A.oJ.. P'" ,,_.._ '1.:>4IIL ICU All. C ...... C ■p1cllr ICU l O I t.0.1. l.0.1. · · ' (. .-111e1 llot1 Mlll1 .. lo11 ,"'_•_.-_"_'_•_•_"_•_" ________ (i!5A)1------------- l◄t,0 ICU .-11 A M••• C1p1cllr ICU -d> J!!!,_ .12 3,A:,O ·--!><-h !!t? -• ?.B -..2""° ,r J-d-t~-. ,c, -,...,,-,:, '"(".,,-, ... L-• :5' G. t l .. .! ICU All. I ...... C ■p ■cllr ICU P•t• 30 er 33 CP..t-•••-:., Pc/-r-""5 .--•. ce, ...,s:;.,.-,_'1£)0CJ P./A. ~.A-.! ,._.,.,r_ ICU All. C ... ... c.,.,1,, ICU 1- l O t l.O.I. l .O~~.-I ,, .A 1,1'11i,. ,,... ., ........ .. .... fj_._-_,_._._._"--------(osAJ------------- FMZ 8 . yi Y RANCH 000187 ) . I V, _. ...... )~ -- Jc_ ICU All A C ■p■cllr 1101. -..... ..,,, ..... (\ -J<t<"-0 ,o.o ~ 7o"Tht.- ICU All. I ,cu ...... Capacllr ICU Moira r-.-~, .,4 I'" • l, s l D. .., l.0.1. 1.0 ... ICU All. C Cap ■cllr ,cu . . . t:, .... ,, .... ,. .... ,, .... ,. ,"_• __ .. "_'_•_•_"_•_" _______ (_!!~A)------------- y1,o 11. }.i) ICU All A ICU j II. I Mow, c ■pacllr ICU Mo•• Capatllr ,' Ll ~ :i, • '<cJD ,- Ir "",, ·'" ~ -s:es ,11 -J-400 ,ov-1.. ,LO lo l l.01. . . . A "• .. •••••" ,cu ) P111 31 ,f 33 C"Al4ll~"' 11.0 /r-s s~e..-;::- '( G ,._ ._ 1 ()O<.) ( I "'0"'. l.0.1. P • .u.. ,~ /U( ...,,.,.._ ICU A It C C1p1cltJ ,cu ..... , ...... Ho Mlll11lltt1 "--------m~~J-------- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH OOOtBT .. nrrarsmwrr r:nwwr ruttMTMtttfff Em-P:MrJt'Mtr o·we·r·rr ⇒ I V, N ICU All. a ..... c1,1c11, ,cu i ::!::-~· .,n. ;-.;;;-_, 1l4 -•~ ,uo .., ... -...0 • 10 -..... .,.,n.a.. ~ ,e • I ' 1 • l ,, i .. • " ...... a o • "e, 1,,0.a. rl t- ICU All. • c,,.,c11, ICU c.-..,11,o111,./z·• ""' --•• " .... po,,. .... -111.. .-..., .... ---t .-~"-"'"f ........... w•• .......... , .,._.,.., ~ .. .,. u •r • ..,.•••• S"'"._~,.111..,, .. ,.-., 1 ICU All. C ...... Cap1c1t, a .o.a. ............. ICU -~ 111·11,1111.. .. ...... .. '----------(VIA)'-------- mPftittrtn:2srt:t11Hwn::ru-scwwwwNrehWifttfi1t•ws WfflJfltZdlill Page 32 of 33 .. f ~ c....., .. .,•--~-,. • .,. • .__.,. ~ s , ........... -. Sw.•-..• ..... T f!I ....... .., ._.., ... _ .. ' C&.,.C...... ...... ~IL.Alf ..... :I ......................... "' •-••·· .. I ,. f?-nnJ C.,,.A,/AI ON IUJ • ,...,e Hl'J ' l .. • i 0 IO l . .. .. ... ~ .. ' ,, ICU All. A ICU Alt. • ICU iilt. C ....... c,,actt, ICU .. .... Capecltr ICU ., ... c,,.c11, ICU --~h!U .44 -1400 _J ..!.!l.. .15 ••oo i __!l.1.. ,s-.,o ~•U .,.._ ... . ",. l O a 1.0.1. . . . ... ........ .. .,. ............ 1', ---------[VIA)--------~ , .o.a. ... ........ .. FMZ I puv RANCII urrmt runnnwswmnmnm:m rurr-7 ➔- P191 33 of 33 ' 1 c,.., ... ., ••-/r-• .... ..,. ... ,. ! CAW-.1•• ••/C-C •. ,. ......... ' , .............. _., ,. ...................... ' e,, .. t •--T • ""~1 ....,..,~Ii .... \ .... , ... --1 ~ f"\1 .... 1 ...... , •• .,.,. re""""-. .. ..,....,..~.....,•--• Ii .......... I ~-:~i .. ~-...,. ~ ........ '-"-".,, .. ~ .... .. ......... ! •• ., •• , , ....... 1/1 ,_, ... , I lo 1-4 • k (;.,1-l"H'I] . a,-ru-JJ C ANwe ... a,111,. ~ ~ ) ,s, .. ~ ( ' ~ ( I • I f I V1 I • l w • • • I ' 1 1 ! ., I .. I .. I '4 .. tCU All. A ICU ,Ill. • ICU All. C ICU All. A ICU All. a IC:U _,, C ...... c., .... , ICU ..... c,,., ... ICU ...... c,,.,11, ICU Mawa ca,acltr ,cu µ ••• c.,.,,,, ICU ... ... c,,., .. , ICU -1.!ll!} -,,. .'l.l -c."' ·-. t. 'L -,..:;. .... ' ~ ·"· r .,_ .. , .,, ,r.,o -----ff6'-' JL ~ ..... .:'Ll :Jl.!. .12 IJ•• ..... -~ -_s!J.-1 .;ic, ~ -~~ -, .... ..... r 2!! •• 8 r .J!..1. .I II ,,_ , ... Jl ~ .3, : Lt.. ~ .1e •s-.. ')- -,in,.._ ,'il "Ttlf"-l. . .6, °T•"l'"'L • f>"f -,-.,p.1.. .,i 1.0.•. "J> 1,-0;•· 1 A ,.o.•. •• ........... It ,.1 •• 11111, .... .. ---------(USA) . ...Dl<l;:..lll&Qla.lC:,1.LJUl.:.J&,.1:u:.--- a .o.,. J> L-o.,. -p , .o.,. .. ........... ,_ , .. ,.,1... 111,1, .... . '--------------(IJJA} ~11> ,,., .. , '=" 'l S!: "'"-r/1?. FU7 RIKFILY RANCH 000187 APPENDIX D STREET SEGMENT L.O.S. WORKSHEETS (H.C.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS) FIIZ 8/KELL Y RANCH Page I of 2 I / 11 -9-19-9---------U.S.A. INC. -----------u 000187 -54 - ~ 8/88 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA TABl.E 11-7. LEVEL-OF-SERVlCE CUr°ER.IA FOR. L"'"T'EJlSECTIONS ANO All TEJllA15 0-"T'EASECTIO?-i l.OS LE'\ "EL OF SEJWlCE STOPPED nME DELAY PER VEHICLE (SEC) ~ 5.0 f"Oi -'?°Y 1.., c".,. ~1..e ' SE',. I '-•.>.. C'"-"io.· \~ '-'SA. ~i oF :(lJfea 15.0 15.1 25.0 26.1 to .0 ~-1 to 60. D E F ARTEJllAL CLASS Range of Free Flo•· Speeds (mph) Typical Free fkw Speed (mph) LE.VEL Of SERVICE A B C D E F > 60.0 AllTEPJ.Al. LOS l II 111 45 to 35 35 to 30 35 to 25 ~mph 33 mph 27 mph A\.'EJlACiE. Tl.AVE). SPEED (MPH) 2: 35 2: 30 2: 25 2: 28 2: 24 2: 19 2: 22 2: JB 2: 13 2: 17 2: 14 2: 9 2: 13 2: 10 2: 7 < 13 < 10 < 7 Page 2 of 2 I FMZ 8/KEl.L Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. _________ _,,.,/ 5 00018i -5 - Pag, 3 of 2 1 CALC. OF PEAK HOUR ON CANNON RD. c ,4.,.,HJ..,,-1 l.-'•S> ( -='-"""''w.:, t.-.,--~ftAOAj ..,_,._) tCf'\o J,.. f>t"\, ,~,._~ "--A.. ; ,6,~Sw.""5 i ~/G:I ~ >,Oj' ,,,.' ,o/+c, -'41 /4 :r/"41,. F,rL.p"" F I c::. . I\ oF 1,,,1, u. "-.po&. T: ,... 0 "T -= / 01 5') ~ ,11,i PT /o1 Sc.X) At>1 r f o/0 ~4ovfH- X fc f,. /Jtl'T'e: 10e-/d ~ S1NC&-••"-r ~X» At>T. Cl>p_fJ.. Ol4' ~,we• I'.,-,,.. r~&.•'T'S" ,A~,1.'1, Sc~vf 1+ ICf'l( ,"M, Pr.Ai( J,\,,ol.,f.C.) ,'rSj'"'""e. ~(t..;,,-.. \=iC:., l"l... oC: "'-~A. ;_~7) l l I E:,o..:> AO 7 x_io/o lt Jff]VIH- X bO~ 'i'f> VfH. (P f J,A.. 01< 6"f I.A.l)fE""T'-", S11,1C'~ ,.,._ •"""' ~''-'"S .... ~ "9l''-7 • l9C:,1.. A. fw'.. pr.,wt.. ~-c.) ~ s.s .... •q& s% oF ,4.:>1. /. Gaµo -w/E s,1-,-r • . ~n F="'lG.. 11-oF ._.,S~ .Z.~C i A.Oj :' U.J/'10.., ~/f-3;00cAt7 ~"" C>a-'WJlb: l "!1 -Joo A~-:( ? 8/88 X 'l o/o J,S7G. X"°Z 'fJfl, VfH (p f,,Jctl"~: ~/4 at::: Oy IP1/h"1,~-., :SfNC-f: o-L7 4-ofaA.Dr (!}; I.M, OI< 1S7 tNSp«.'T'w/J s, ... cc ,.,,._,_, r,4,n ~'-'• M"'-7 • FM:Z 8/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -56 -000181 Page 4 of 2 I F11-:, ,-t:\~. l\ oF "--' S4-({.sporz..r : AOT-= 11., 00o At)T \1., oc:ii.:> "1)1 y._ ~o/o ~60Ut'~ X:b0% IJ o'T19 : (0 &" / 6 ~,.:: ~I I~ 'St'K,ro~ @ /_,M. {Je,4,t:. 14,)WC. OJ( ,."f (AJ~C.71.:,....,,. ~"-~ ,.,,,.. C'°LG. \ 1.. C) F us A Cl. e-fo4.r : -i.o.,wc,::, ,cr.01 f... \t 01- \1 b"li Vff/1, t&o% C,&j Vt~ Co E",b ot< A'f \t.aSff:C.."7~"" @()~,PEA""-'"'°""<. o<: o.--r 1~~(:C.Tlo-"" 'FltoM l='t<.._\'l. ~r-1..4.$16. F,.s:;.poLr: .AtJT-=-1."fjl.Oc-'G,-,cL.""Dt;) ,;co.,""°' F~J" o0,,44,.r,1:115 {"Oltl/',l~TIU~ ~ 8/88 I> C\1' Vt'"'- "f, 600/., ll b"'l. VfH tJ O"T,S ,' Cu 'S./1!> 01<.. 1).7 fU'f'~7'-e.l"J . (2;J I .I"'/. ,E 6tt! ,..."--.. #I< I! 't IN s/ec.. TlilN, FIIZ B/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. ----------00_0_1-,1 -57 - d = d~ cl ==- ! 8/88 Page 5 or 2 I RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DELAY CANNON Q.-.:>A't) c.:-.. C"~'~ Q.c.c.1.. --r:'AQ.Af;;A"f ~v•) ( AS.,;'-'""'-J) >-.."' ~g -1...A.., e 9 -4~-'" The random intef\o:t1on .il'l;,ped dda~ eq:.:.auon ii (I -, 1c1: d • 0.38C [l _ (1/C'J(,t")J + P3 X" ((X -!) + .J(X -I):~ (W(/c)l (11-l) d .. 1,erage stor;,red dela) per ,chicle for tbc subject lane croup. ir. !,CC/\eh; C • c:yclc lcnr.h, in sa:: I IC • u=n ratio for the sut-,c:• lane group; tbc ratio o( d'e;ti,·c r,ei:n time tc C}.:k lcnrth; X • .,;, ratio for the ,ub1ec: lane croup, and c • capacit)· or the· 1hrou1l: lane croup C: l'l.01.€c:.. 'le= .s-0 " '14b vt~ x· ir.. = noc~ ... c: = no,~ .... (,'ls) +-,.,)(.11') Q-. 4 4) .lr--v (.,,)-+-{.IJ1) '] (,1'1.) er \ s. 'i ;-$''1.'" [~] ,~.~ S:~C, FIIZ B/K ELLY RA NCH U.S.A. INC. ----------✓ _ 58 _ 000187 d -::. d-=- d -=- ? 8/88 Page 6 of 2 I RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DEL~ Y C.A.NNt1r.> R.OP..'t> (rAIV-~'f /lo..V'f!::..-f.11o,si.c-"b51. N~•") · G ss ..... ,-.,u, "~ ""t'-,,o "-",... c,0 . . The randoa: inter\=:t1cm ,1-i;:-pcd dei.i) eq·..at1or. ii (1 -l'C"]= d • 0.3SC ( . . ~ 1'73 X: [(X -J) + I -(IICJ(A )) ,/lX -I); ~ (16Xtc)) (l l•l) d • l'-eragc s1;,ri'Cd delay pe: '-ehiclc ror tbc subje.:t l1Dc croup. in ~ /\ch. C • cycle lcnr-r •. in we; 1/C a &recn ratio for the ,ut-je:! lane sroup, the ratic o( de.:ti•c r-=n ti:nc tc-t;.:lc lcnith. X • v I c ratio ro~ the ,u,,0:1 lane ,~oup. and (. <. ") c • ca;-ac1t)· of the th~:1111~ lane (l'Oup. 4 r-., \'"'}.';> \ .. '\.'"> (. "l.5') [6 '?,1.) ~ -v (. 10). (.uol.) -+ i0-0 {. 1,1,) + 81),0 (-.:,1--+-. 'lt.1.J .,.. • ~ "i' = \ 1. is~ . FIIZ 8/ICELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. -59 - ... SSl.o""\f"l"O~: C: 17.0S€C., '/c = .s-o ., 11 bl Vf14 'X • ic.: 1100~'4 C : 11O0\l~-.,. '] 000187 ( \}J { (?;, s.i-... , :"1. c-... ,..., ... ~'- 1 '_(:,A.(IJ,,."'tl,"'7 2 PA-s;;-1:> "'bwi. l-4~ e/J3. ~ PAS&0 'tlal. ,_.~.,. s ;::,A~'PA~ 6 £\. C::A.••""W\a --~ I 9 10 11 12 13 . 14 15 ARTE'RlAl S\JMM.AJt"I or 11'TtRSKT10S D[lAY ESTlM.ATES Anmal C.Ab!~O~ so~i) F1k or Caw No: \If= A Q_ \Cf9'2. 'C)el'P J (: r::,tJ /J ~ TTOAJ < (w1-rrt-OC'li'~~S. 10E ~;,&rrd LI"" Cvclt' v/t Cro.:r ~II llauc-C1p,1a1~ C ,,c ). C ~ ~ ....iL J.:1E!:._ l'l.o ~ ~ ,700 -- ----- J::2._~ ~ .!.2E2... ~ ~ .-r.L .!.J.E.£_ --------- --------- --- -- ------- •i.a-n-> •1•1,1, n,. ------ --- ---- 1-andom Anwal Dt!•y• Anwal (M'tl-Tr;,r IS'. i ...J_ J.1!_ _J_ ------- 17.! I -- I S'.i I ----- ---- ------------- .......... (I,...._, -•'0,,1,)) -p,,.._. f•,-l'T, 1 Mvl9P') s..,pp,,,,DN, "> U••r 1+---11-2 NOlU t'rt,pftlior. E.,.t1m1t.cl f.:"\01 Sior;"f'd pp oP:1y .t:.S:~ ... '1~-.? ... !:?.1: ... Z'"!1.4:\. . . .. . . ... . '.' ..... ...... ' .. . . . .. . .. . /.J"i '.t?~~L. .. ' ' . . . ,. 'S4 ~~-.? ... ......... . .. •· .... ...... . . .......... . ........ ' ......... . ... . . .. . .... ..... ..... .. .. .......... .. . . . . . . .... ~ ..... ··•· ..... .......... . . .. ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. ... . .. . ........... . ........ b-.l'r:'W'I: LO'i- . A \:)_' '.' . ... '' (> ''' A ' .. ' .. ' .. . .... '. . . .. .. . ' . ...... . ..... ' . . ....... . .. ·••· . ........ . .. . . . . . Page 7 of 2 1 •bound ,~!1:n111"C! Ar;-rt:la:h DP!a~·• .1.1~-~-- ?>~: -~-. '.' ..... . .. ' ... .°1?.-. "· ' °;)\, I:. . ... " .... . ........ . ........ . ........ ......... .. ' ....... ' ........ . 'o •o Io• o ......... ......... M,._.c......., llo-..,. • -! i.--,.....,i hr,....._. 11_. , •(\'{PHI 111.' 11 i. ..... w,-,.,, t • ---"-: l,, ,......., ,,_ , ... ,... t • ............ ·-· u,. .. , ... ,. i..i~ ..... 11. ~ r • l.t«• II ,-; II II''• n...1111ifh'1•,,.......1t , .... .,, .... , .. ,,_ ...... -,.... .,.,. ..., .,_, FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH J 'V1,__ __________ U.S.A. INC. ----------~ O 8/88 • 60 • 000187 VJ/E> Sey.· •cnt &\."""" .... ~ 1 S:.,a.UO,..':} 2 ,,..~l)l,l.)I~ e/s, • ""'"0~11•111 !-c:.-.~o•, fl 11\. C.t.N.,.,o "'~'" I & 9 10 11 12 13 1' l5 8 8/88 Page 8 of 2 I VII•• ITHlft COMrl'TATIO!'>. Of AJlTt1U4l U'\'El OJ Stk\'ICl WORKSHttT Allf'f'i1I ~A~~IH.l ~OA-~ --baland ~C•w• \/~AR,, \'1't1.. t>.1,· ~ OCSA/v~li:)P.=-ColJt,J'l!l&C::,-IO!Q ,UT Sl'D • '60!' (Sun, el ~1hl s.irn ot fun,, ~ ~th A,,r.-,a\ 11c,,,.· (mil Cl11• (11\f'h\ -1:tl.. ;r &.. J£!___..:_~ --- \.OJ Ar~ _L_ - 1-04~~ -- ---- ------- ------ --- ----- '""'"'!'I'd~- R.:!".nil\& bitt:WC Olhrl Tunr• A~:h Dell\· ~•on (MCI ~:,~-· (w-ci 73.~ -'31, (. . 10 ... ···-·· - aL. "I P·" 10-I-······ ······ -- ...... ---tlt-"'\ 'l:S7'f. "' l£_ ·····. - i!..1.. ')I." 1.0.,. ······ -...... -- ...... --- ······ -- ······ --- ······ --- ······ --- ······ --- ...... --- ······ -- FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -61 - Sumo! 5'.irn of A."tr.\al A.-,,n,l TUMk· ~t-l-)· Sl'O ~~ ~ Sff11on (11".;-!-.l S..."t1cr., -'~t-.~-. -'='?~ .. 1"h' ... ·-'~--- .rz .. 1 .. ~. .J:~---l-\-., ... ..,S .. ........ ········ ········ ........ -·•···· . ....... ........ ··••· ... ,-u..o .1:!).~ ... ,i , s ·••· ····•· ... -'~--~--.\-u~ .. 1-" C ... ~ .... ······· ········ ........ ........ ........ ········ ........ ········ ....... ········ ········ ········ ....... ········ ........ ········ ....... ......... ········ ········ ······· ········ ........ ........ ······· ........ ········ ........ ....... ········ . ....... ......... ······· ........ ········ 000187 CALC. OF PEAK HOUR ON EL CAMINO REAL "l.'\,'W'O ADj X. "! ~ or-A '-)I '?,. '5,'.)l. V pr-', I X '-c::>o:t ::s-., ......a. ...... t, \, Ai-=>,._ vf~ J:.~I"'\ ~IG.. I\ o C: l.l.S ,a. IU'4'01l.j'" / 3 0.1 '3,.::iu Al>1 'A i % .::>C:: ,.,.1>i 'l., A i4 \/fH '{.. b0% s.:,.,..T~ ... ~ \, 4-s-4 \lf)f,4 (v 1'4~ ·. A . ,.,.. · f """' <-1.1..:N I(. .., I 6 <!? +o ,.t '1P-_ VQI... 1.r 1...4:$,s \14.a.1.J 'S/a VOL-.-So 'tty ,us,u~,,_._ ~ 'I At"r t....i.i:.,-,r;41_,._1.,, 'To S/& ~S:. ~ f.l"'\, O~ 5-y \M"Sfk""rw .. S1>•C'C:: S'A.,.C. Sfl..1-r'J ,.,s • ·-.... .,.\,.,_. co JJ.:rrS.: A, .M. lt:.A1<. ~-.c.. ,-J/& CE, ~~ ~ d.""f ,~~,~-r-~. a>p.~ ol<. ~-,· ,,_.,fkj1•,.,, S"11otc-5." ~A/#1.6 :;>t1t..17'A:S >,,.,..... J11,. ,,1.,LC • l ctct \ P.. .,-... , pe .a.~ 1-4-o I..\ It. ; ,...:ssv.""' E 8 % A0-t] '-o/~o 'l) , tt.·k-r~o.u A'-Sf I.., T . Frt.."" ~\C.. 1'1.. OP. \.llA. G.~'9 A07' = 'J'"'2-J)OO. 31...~ ~c:>O At:11 ')(. ~~/ooP.~ '37, 000 "'t)T X J o/.:, o,a ..-.,1 1, ,"0 v,~ ~"·or o . So,,IT""'~J) /1 11 b VP~ 8/88 ct) l'\oi~; t,,. .M. tlU,."-. "'--'IL.. ,_,,, G2 4~% Cl(. 6/ ~~"t ... ...i a:, f.M. oK.. 1,,_, ,ws,«-c.'T ... ~ ~ ,.,e., r,-,.... ~,._ •7 .r A~ ,-. . ~. ,6-91'-"'-S • a, No, E ~ ,.. ,-. . 'P&AK. ~---,., JJ e 4-:) % °'< ,, \NV 6'7,g"' (Jt)PJ-\· 01<. '7 \,.,,,.,,.,."-=>..., s,,.,c• s "'"""' ,, .. ,7~ 4S ..... ~. ~__.Las. FMZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. ----------✓ 000187 -62 - l'f 'f() P1g110of21 ~ . ""' . P ii.-,.." t,t,.~Q.. • Jr s~ I..V-\ e. ) er.:. AbT; ,01~ ~\11..sc.,,..i,.,,.'-'Sl'-'T· A 01' ~ "l.. 9,bOD Ffli>I"\ ;:\c.. lo Of-~s" R.EPon.7 : ~~) (b<,;X:, ·x &"o/o '2,.1 "J b8 \l rt' Xbo% /J+ :2,.1 VfM I ~a_,-~LC.. 1~ "l. 4=t, lO'-' X ~ o1. 1.. I J "l,,3 V~t,, 'I,. Go0/. 13q, v,~ I '31✓ s c.::o .Ji.D; ~ gc/4 1-Sl.D "f~ • ,X.bo't G) ,-.i oTeL N /fl Q.. 4,o % c" A~T .:>IC. d 1 1•st&<"T~.., 4::) f JI'..• •y ,., lP f-'"'T.,.,.. ~"''""c. .,. ...,_a .,-,c..,-rs ,_,,., c:t> ·e. ~ ,A.OT j (. Q/ 4-o ..,A-Ct-== '2.. Clf1 \00 At>7' >-)ctT'c: W/6 <e. -4.0% oc: A07 o<. '-1 \toaSf'(:-C.i<ow ~ f.fA,. OI<. 61 IN'Sf~-r••w -,,-.,c-& ,:-...,_t!: S'iC..•T'J ,t,.ff'-'f • -g 0./ ,._o-• loo/ 4o ~ \ 2..~ T•01>JA'-SI'-1T . ro l.,1 _>, 07 = "3 11 S~o AD T FMZ B/KELL Y RANCH ______________ _) -w "'----------U.S.A. INC. U 8/88 000117 -63 - Page I I of Z I RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DELAY Tb, l'lllldozn inu~ect10r. llt'pped dcl•~ eq1.1a1ion ii, 11 -,1c1= ti• 0.3EC (1 _ (IICJ(.l")} + 1n X: {(l' -t) + ,I(); -I)'~ (le.X,-c)] (11-3) d • 11oerag, s10;-;,ed de:la~ per '-thi:lr for the s1.1bje:1 Jue SfOUJ), jr, SO: / lo ch: C • c:yc:lr leu~~ .. in 1«; I IC• lfecn rat1c, for the s1.1bje:t lane (:rl>u;:,. tbr ratio o{ cf'c.:ti-·c r=r. time IC' C:).:le le:-.(th: X • rlc ratio fo~ the sub.)CCI l.ne srour. and c • capa:it) of tbr throu1t: lant ,roup. C: 1to~~c.. '/c.:: .S"o . "' , r -v,14 X--/(,.= .}4oo"'"' C : 3,A.oQ ~ ~ 1 FMZ I/KELLY RANCH / 'ff.,.,_ __________ U.S.A. INC. __________ ,,. 8/88 -64 -000187 ( <le,, S.S· .... "~ .... , 1 C.A ftllJCN l C.-11.&.6~ 3 FA~OA'f 4 P. A,i.. ~ 1--1 /S, " P,A, ll- 7 ~,._AAO/>.'f 6 c.c,1,,,1.64• 9 C:.A._. NO:M 20 'K ....... 1 11 12 13 14 15 'B 8/88 AJlT[JUA.l S\JMM.U\ OF lNTtllSECTIOS D[L,\'\' ESTIMATES Anmal E I. C'.A.M\NO 1l.S: AL.. Fur cir Caw ND: yir .a,..ft !'1'1~ WIW Cy.II-v/c ein,ur Lr.l;th iatar, C1paC1l~ C ,,c X C ,s,,.,.,.. ~~fto!·~ ...l:b2.-~...:.!i.....li2!!.- ~~~~ ..ll.!L -.:£2-. _.:.±i,_ 'l~- .Jl.L~~~ ---- ~~~~ J.::!_~~~ ...!1:2-~~-U22- ...l:l:e.......:.!!!..~~ ~-=.!!...~~ ---------------·-...-.11-, •t..-.. n◄ - ~u,d01111 A.rn•·al Dt:,,·· (t«) ~ ..La.:l._ .!!L ..Lil_ ~ - ~ -l.U ~ ..LU... ,,.') - --- . Am•·•' T~rP _L,_ _l._ ' - ...J_ -L- -- _l_ I I I - --- ....... ,., (1. ....... .,..., •• 0.11, 1-"''"""-· '-"" l'f r •w.,1.,,, ~ 0.le) ", U • • ..,._ II-: NOTI~ DI~. Pftf'lnd~·. ~lim Ullll\lll'd N:'\OI Slop;,td lrite'!« ,,. 0.1•~-LOS, .. \..~:'r ... .1-.:~": L .. -~-... . . .l::S:t ... . ".l,.~·J ... (3. ····· .. .):~-t. .. _-µ,"_.\ ... .I>. ..... ,.s-4 . ?-:-~-). .. . G ·.\·.~~ .. .';.~:!.. . e ...... . . . . . . . , . ......... . ...... . \:~:4 ... "'l.S'.I .G ....• ...... .. .. l:~4 ... 1r. I i .. ......... .. l•J~ ... ,i_S'. I a ...... .......... . ·'--~"-.. ~-~:.'. .. .I> ..... ... ,.-f, ... "'~-, ... .B ...... ·········· ········· ........ .......... ········· ........ .......... ......... ········ .. ..... ... ......... ........ Page I 2 of 2 I •bound h11:na1.cl Ar7-CM1Ch Dt:•~., ~~-.; ... -:,. k ~ ... ,-2... ~.. . '),.. "· .. )~--~ .... ······· .. 1.~-~ .... u ... ~ .... ~l:-·.~·-··· '-H:.~ .... 12,.C.. ········· ··•···•·· ········· .......... ......... I ._,.__,....,...,...__,~i.-,,.,...i1_....,,_,1-, ••f\'/l'HF1I~ J llloNp-,..,...., r•-"-· ... , .. ,_,..,..,_ Cto1,... ..... .,. .. ...c1,.,.,.lh,.,.._.~ ............ 11 ! 1 • I.IOI· 1P 111 ,r If •C • ,,,_~ ... ...,.,,__ , ........... J .. ----,. ............ ...,_, FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. -65 -000181 s/e:. Sei· _, ~ .. 1.--, l c:,a....,,..o,., 2 C.:t&.J.•c.e- 3 F•~"f 4 p .4. «... C. ~/B ... ,. A,. e.. 7 ~ A 'l,>OA 'f i c.a..i-ec:-.• 9 c,..,..,,U.M ""to ~8\.'-1 11 12 13 14 15 Pa9e I 3 of 2 I va••' 1nu11 COMrl"'TATJOS or .UTEJllAl lf\'[l 01 SUt\'ICl WOJ\KSHETT -•M!Und Artfflal F '-C:.O.("':'!'O A&AI.. Filr111Caw• YFAlf.. \Gt<{O t)atp ___ _ I.KT SPD • '6,0C' !Sur., ri t.,ryJ;thl !..mo: Tune J>rt.ra,,cn~-. ""' R.:r.nms ~h A.-ima! Flo-TUM" (ffll' c, ... (ffit--!'I I S«tit,i, (MC} -~ ~ ~ ~ ...... .9'f ~-~ ..:1.L ...... .,, ~ 1!:-Z,_ ~ ...... .s1 ...lL_ 45 AS ······ ------····•· -- ----... . .. -- _=!1_ _:a;:_ ~ A s ······ --·" ~ ~ S"'~ ....... .J"f ~ ~~ .:1L --...... .i> -1E.._ ~ '" ....... ---....... -- ------....... - ---...... -- -----...... --...... - ' "Uw TaW. n..i w 91111•,': '°> --=-'' ....,.. ,._ -1\ ·-·--., .,.,._,_ -o. .. , .. _ .... ~ .... .,,., ..... -· .. ,.w. , ... .. __ ............. 11, .. -..... -,:.c, ..... ..._, l:\lr.'1« A~ Dt:a, .. '3 ,._ (. Jl.-'- )l.-~ ")1.-~ "Jl..G. ::,1.., )2. C. )l..L 0tM: S-.1111 of Sun,of Anma! A,-,f':'lal ~~ T-t,-~h to,· SPO LOE-~ (t«l s..,,_. S«-IIGl'I (~l S.-C-!\V-' -~=~----~~-... 3,o;~ .. A. ... -········ -ll?~.1 .. "' .. l.~~,. --~ ... -! ....... -ss:"!~. _,, .. ~'.'7-.~---~---· -.. ..... -~-1.·.~-.5'7 .l.~~---~ --········ ... --. ······ ........ •·· ., .. ........ -····-· ......... ·••· ... ··•···· . -7.?~~-. ----~-! .. l.'-,q .F> .... ·. ----~~~--. ,, . -i."!-.V .. .. e. .... -......... -Jol.J .·n 30,'t .A ..... -........ ......... -11." ,!3 -~':':>.. . .A .... -. . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . ......... ........ ......... -....... ········ ········ ........ -······· ········ ......... ........ -........ . . . . . . . . .......... . ........ -·•····· ........ ........ . ....... FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH __/ ...,,.... __________ U.S.A. INC. ----------"' \l 8/88 -66 • 000117 i 8/88 RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DELAY &I.. c ... __..,.,011.,;At.. ( ll-•'-"-'( 't)lt. -C.A-1,11,.lop,j et.b:) {l -111'91• d • 0.35C ~---~"---1 -~ 1'73 r-[l.l' -l) .. JI -(liCHX>] . ,1(X -I)' -(10X1,)] {11-l) d = l\era,e stor;:,ed delay per \eh1;Je ror tbe sut-j.:t lane rroup, in s.c;: '"eh; C = cycle lcnr,r .. in sec; I IC • grc:,cn rauo for the s~t-je:• lane s:roup, 1be ratio of d:.:th e green time t(I ') .:lt lenrth; X • rl( ra:io fo: rhe subji:c-r lane ,roup, and r = capaeil) of the througt: wit iroup IS, 4 d -l r.~ + + 41..v (-.4'i + .ss) 4(.,1( 01) -:. \'l.7 .s.ec. FMZ 8/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. -67 .. Page 14 of ZI C: 1t.os,c.. !/c = .s-o " 1711.Vf~ x.,, if..= 3,400~.i. c: : 3400 \Jt .... 000181 ( sjs S.-S· ... K•-'-'/ 1 CANll)OIIJ ., N/G. 'I C "~NO/I .. v .. :.1..-t 5 6 7 . 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 1!1 8/88 ARTERlAl SUMMAR\" or lt-;TtRSEC'TIOS DELA\" E.STlM.t.TES A.nrnal £L S::11121~\AIO ~EAL FalP111C1wNa: \(1=AS,, 1q9 2. WM C'vcw v/c Cl'Cll:r ~h lat,o Capaal~ C ,.,c " C ..J.J:2.. ~ ~ ~ \1-0 .so ~ :)4,:)0 ------- J!:!_ .so .S'l.. ~ --- \1.0 ~ -S'"l } "'CC' ------------- ----------------------- ----------- ----- •r..,..-II•> •t-n• -------- Jtandam ""''"a! Dt:ay-~ IMC) JlJ.... .lll - J!1 .lil --- -- --- -- -- -- -- "'""'"'' T~"P" ..J_ _J_ - _j_ \ ----------- 'Mu19pi~ ,..,..__ .,_a! 0.la) ,_ ,,_,_,,_ ,_ P'F1 ..... .,., _,,,..;! o.i., "> u ... ...-... -11,J N01U Datt Pffplr..tt-,. P~•ion UtUNttd h:-tar S.OJ'i"'d lnlffl« PF' Dt:a.·· LOS, . _1:~1 ... ir~~---· .. A ... 1-.~1 ... i~ .. ~---· i:> .... . .. ·····--·-········· ... ... ·'---~-1 ... i~ .. ~---· .'t'. .1.-.S" :1-.. ?-t.-.~---.. A .... ········· ········. .... .. . ......... ········ . .... . .. .......... . ....... ...... ····•·· .. ......... ........ .......... ......... ········ ·········· ········· ........ ·········· . . -.. -... ......... ·········· .......... ········ ............ .......... ........ ·········· ··•·· .... ········ Pag, I 5 ,r 2 I •bound Ull~tl'd Ar;,roath Dt1.y41 ~1-.1: .. 'li,1-.. . ...... ~?~.4 .. ,,~~-- ........ ......... . ........ ········· ··••····· ......... ······•·· .......... ········· .... -. .... I M...-,i! ............. _,_, .. ...,......,,_....,_n-c ••f\"tpHr,11: J II It"' P'auf ..,,,...,, , lo -'--'· • N: ► ,...,.,,.. •-· o.,, .. tr,., ..... ~ 1-. U. ,.,..,~ ..,.__ 11-, r • I.I« • '-,, C, •C ' ,,...,..,....,.,,..._ .. J ...... 61!., -lft ._,..,. .,.,. .. ..,_, '· FIIZ 1/ICELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. ________ __,.,/ -68 -000187 sf&. Set.· .,.,,, Ka.1..-f 1 c>-1,u.1ow ., ,..., /(). , C. ,.. ... r-i,-"4 \(v,1-1..1 !- 6 7 8 9 10 11 J2 J3 14 15 ~ 8/8B P191 I 6 of 2 I COMPl.'lATlOS or UTtR14l uvn or StRVlCI WORKSHErT AIIPnal El.. (AMI/JO RlirAL. --t-ound nl, cir Calof •. ':J.E.~(],. l ~~"2.. Datr: A.In SPO •~(Su~ fl l.t-::!£thl ~mo! TLll\1 'l"ffj'l-.d "ti:,· Mff R .. :-.nins ~~:h Anrnal Flo• Tunr• (fflll Ciao (mrhl !.«1iC7.'I (,-.cl ..JE_ .:.12.. 4.S ...fL -...... ----...... ----...... -.n jf_ ~ .iL .... '. -----. . . . . . - -------' .. . . -- -----...... -- -----...... - -----. . .... - -----...... -- -----...... -----...... ----. . .... -- --······ -- ······ ' "Ua, l•blt JI_. ""4 Jlllllgpl) l,l w.,,,..., .,.,., .,_,..,. ..,,,..,.•"! .,, AtlrN' wff\lM') of i,.._, - ~t),~~UL"T•W\"-&W'Mh"'"' ..... ,,.,; ..... ,_.~ ,.i.i. ,., .,.. .._ ... -"'°'' ._..., ,.:., •a,.., .. "' -plan ,,,., ~I Ir.Im« A~c-h Del1r• . 7"'-4 :,7 . .-1 Ouw1 ~:,-,of Dd•~ Tllm "t-)· c-1 S.-C,,on tJ/4-101.; . ...... --.. ... . . -.. ... . >,1/A . 1~?-:~. --. . . . . . . --....... -. ·····. --....... -.. . .... -. ...... -······· -····· .. -... . ... -....... -....... FMZ 8/ICELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -69 - Su111of ~,-.al Anmal ~ht-)· Si'D LOS-to\· S«1,on (a,r!I I S..C-ti~ .. ,~!:> .. ,;~ ... ,. ..A .... ........ ........ ..... . .. ........ . ....... . . . ' .... . ..;~?. .. -;l<r_,'.1 .. A . ... . . . . ........ .. ' .. . . ........ . . . . . . . . . ....... ........ .... ... . . ....... ........ ...... .. .... , ... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ...... ' . ······ .. ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ······ .. ········ ········ ......... ········ . ....... ........ 000187 a° 8188 I c:itC!. 4 /:I,.. M. P9A.14 ..,._Q..) fl-•.s:""""C. F~.:11...... ~~c::... \S' Of V.$ ... 'tlSf)11t.i I' "l i 1 ;,; O Al:ilT 'f.. c!,o o.-Al:IT '), Ol '-VflM 1.. ,o'to ,;-.... ., .. ,_., Pu 1 7 or 2 I -' t,1.:rt:-P, ,,..,,..,._ ,.,A,,,,_ ~ '°"/B. aa .,.% oF' VO"-w-111. I'll> '-•S.J .,-1,u, .. S/1 Vo._ J S",111 11."'f \i,a\fCC.'t••"" 1 1-.:i~ ,.._ _..'""t UF'.w.f ;' .S.l&L.OS., -~ ,.,.,... 01"-•1 v,.,:fec.-,,.,.,, :1,"c, •-• ,._.., i,,1,_._ ,,,.....,,...'> &.6,-,~•o~ ,... ,,i...u. \CI\C\.S,. A.M. PEA~~""'n_ / ASS14,...,a -'S""=.A"trT; ,c.::i/4c ,-.,;s S'f41T• PIZ.o,.,,._ 'F1c::..IS c~ u.~,. P.,Si)O~ .,.C-.1:>'T :::-"f-).,S'OO. --'I-:,., .S-i:> c::, ,..,bi X S'o/o •" ,..t)T "3,.420 V9~ 'f.. 6 0 o/o f',104.T~Clouw.O 'l., oli vp~ C.7 1~5fftt:'TtO,,.,., J-oS IS ,47 l..4AJ7: ,-I/&~ Ct) f ,f"\, 014 d.7 IIJS,ft:TW"' ~/N~-$"~I!:. FIIZ a/KELLY RANCH / U.S.A. INC. -• ________ ...., • 70 -000117 ~ 8/88 Page I 8 of 2 I RANDOM INTERSECTION STOPPED DELAY ;;1.. c:::;0,.,..._"',o RE"•'-(1<-="...._-, bll. -CAi-lNO>-l ~~:::, EQUATION 11-3 PAGE 11-10, 1986 HIGHWAY CAPACfTY MANUAL The r&ndotl': intel'\ect10r, ,1c,r,ped dela~ eqw11or. u (I -,,c1: d • O.lSC [ ~ 173 X: ((.t" -I) ..,. l -(I/ C')lX)J ,'U:' '": Ii ..-qtiX;c)J (Jl-3) d • ••·c:-a1e stor::,ed dcuy per '-chicle for the s1.1bje:t lane JT'Oup. ir. s«h·eh; C • cycle lcnr.r.. in sec; r / C -sn:cn ratio ro~ tt,c lll~e:· lane-SJ'OUj:, lbt ra:io or d!'~t1•·e r-=r. ti::nc tc C).:lc Jcnr.h; X = rlc ratio (o~ the subj=:: lane ,~our. and C =-ca;:,a:ity or tbc thiou,r. lane rroup c,-.~ri. ~ . ~ J ~ ':.'i(\'~o"\ f-(.-cX"..,.s)] ""\"'13(.4f') ~As-1) .. V(o4s-i),.-+{1~ ~~) 'j d : A>-'-(;;)+ zsK-.ss-}-V. >Vt -a ·]' d.= \4,'-+ 3'>~1- d-==-14-., se.c:. ; t FIIZ B/KELL Y RANCH U.S.A. INC. -71 - \ 9"'f 4 ~p. ~ ~R... ASSUMPTIONS C: lt01.;c.. 'le= .s-0 " ~!IOWI'. x~i'~:: ""·i,,o~ .. ~ .,,.,,45 (: : 'tOD0 ~'f\f'L- J.7, "700 ... ":::>, X. <it% "'}, ol f, 1,60%, /1 8/0Vf" 000181 ~ 8/88 Page I 9 or 2 I RA:~~~Ml~::~::cz~OAN>J~~O::.E~~~~~~y SL-v~) EQUATION 11-3 PAGE 11-10. 1986 HIGHWAY CAPACrTY MANUAL d -0.38C (I {I -,icJ:_ + 173 r {(X -1) + -(l.'Cll,A )j J{): -J); -r (l6X. r)J (JJ.J) d • 1,erag.e s1orped delay per ,ehiclc for the subjo:1 laae rroup. ir. s« .', eh; C • cycle lenr:~ .. ir. s.ec; I IC • rrcen ratio fo~ the sa~i::• lane -irout, tbc ra:io o( c!c.:ti,c rr= time lo C).::lc l~r.h; X • vie ratio fo: the subJe::t lane ,~ou;-, a:1d C • Qpa:it) or tbc: d1~ou,1: knc: rrour c! ~ 4 S. I. c~ ~) -+-41..1 E ·41 -t \!".,:!, + .1.;Q'l, J d .... \ S". 4 +-4b, '8. ~ i •. 4-\ ) \ • .., a ---q: ............. 1- d -=-I S:-• -4 s ec::. f I FMZ B/KELL Y RANCH ASSUMPTIONS· 1"'-•< .. .::. .. t\ "01.. A-1,,sc .. ...,Cl"· .,._ ""· U.S.A. INC. ----------0-00-1--:: -72 - AM 91s~lt! \~L ,-. ~ 8/88 S.S· amt K-e1..1.'{ 1 CAIJNON 2 c,:,L.L.~aie 3 4 ! 6 ' 9 10 11 J2 l3 15 A.JlT[JUAl SUMMAR\" or 111:TtJlS'ECTION DELA,· ESTIMATES Mm■l· ~I_, C.A ...... l!::,! o B•A'- FurorCavNo: \ C\q4, PE'AIC'.. \"-0""-n.. De~. Prrr,al"Pd to,· WM Ralldarri Cy:lr ,·fc c~r Atn,·al f'r05:,..nion b!1TNttd L.mgth R1t1c-Cap■:it~ Dela, .. Arnn! F.:1111 Stor;-tc! C ,,c X C (W'CI T~t" ,.,. Dtl1, .. ~~..:.::!.. 4,00l; \4. '-J._ \. CS4 1-:1-.·.~--......... J1:.£....:£.£...:.Eh -4,ooo IS-4 J__ .I.·.'~.~--~~:-1 .. -----......... ········· -----········· .......... -----...... .. ... ...... -----......... -----········· ········· -----------......... . --------·········· ········· --------.......... ········· --------·•···•···" ········· ________ ..................... . --------·········· ......... . ..... _II·) •·r.111o 11◄ ,......,., Cl,o,...,_...,,,,..., Drll1·1-lhar•-f-f'F1 •MulaJ,11..,,... i>.1.t111-j U ... Ml"•-11·2 NOTU In~ Lo; --~ c.. P1g1 2.0 of 2. I ·bound £.!.:1."l\1trd '· Ar;,r--■:h Dtl1,,. '2.".\.~~- 3o. 'i ··•· ..... ······. ··•·····. ··•······ 1 ,..,..... ...... ..., a..,.,.•-, .. ....,.. ... 1-a.,.,.., II•• .-• (\'/PHf 1 • 1,; J 1111,..pouru,-..,,, ,.-~ "-l .. ,...,......,_ C1w1,-.. ••••"'•wch-11w•1..,1•~1N11P,ll·S 1• U«· W Ill" C,.'C ,,_ ........ , .,,,...._,. , ......... , ... _..,_,i....,.,.tt,,~ FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. -73 -000181 ~ 8/88 l(e:1..1..-{ J c:.,!JNON 2 c:;;ii..L..E.~ 3 4 7 I ' 10 11 J2 u u 15 P191 2 I of 2 I COMF\.'1ATION or AJ!.Tl,.lAl U\'El OJ Stl\'lC't Vt'O'R.KSKtn All'Prial Cl-CAM\tJO ~--~L. -•'-ftd Fur• C11u. I c:r-=r4 f!!A~ ~OC-lR. Dai,.___ AXrSP'D• SMX'!Sia111r1.tty:1111 Su111o1 funi ~!Id~-. ,_ R.1M1"S lr\lm« ~th Alffllal Flo-T_. Aw-rh (m,\ Cle" (1n~l MftlCt!I (t-"Cl Dti., .. .gs ~ AS ~ :.,,.,_ ...... ~~-~ -~ ,1c.S ....... ___ _ .......... ___ _ ....... ___ _ ---······---- .......... ---- ........... ___ _ ___ .......... ___ _ ___ ............ ___ _ ---······---- ............ ___ _ ........... ___ _ ........... ___ _ ' "'-1aW. II_. 8"' ...ia,i1 "> -s:-,,1...,.• . ......... _'")_,.,...... __ ,,., ......... -• O.io, ... _ .. ---..... .,,.. .. h,_l!l lhll laWr I• ... ... -. .... ........ 11,--... •-plaet ..... ._. 0-.hr: S.:111of Slaff' etf Mr.\&! A.T'ltl"I&: DI:•~ TIIM lo) i.n.,t1 to)· 51"0 LOSt-. (1«\ ~ Stnilffl (tnr~-1 S«,1:,-\ -.,.1~?-. ..... ~~-.-~t~.~-.P. ... 9 ,., .,s -~.I:~. --~--- ......... FMZ 8/ICELL Y RANCH __/ U.S.A. INC. ________ .,., -74 _ 000187 -.. LEGEND: ~ ~ 1 4 39 8 16 435 · 180 2 3 487 53 31 314 1 4 5 t Its 25 98· 40 15 1 28 7 • XXX • AM Peak Trips XX X = PM Peak Trips SOURCE: Barton Aechman., Summary of Traffic Counts, I 0/86 APPENDIX E. HILLSIDE DR./PARK DR. . . EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIIZ 1/l<ELL Y RANCH ~ 8/88 U.S.A. INC.------------_75 • 000111 NO &CAL.[ L.EGENO: XXX s 0l1tribut1on CJfi XX X = AM Peak Trip, XXX = PM Peak Tripe 50~~ ,,50% UNIT A • PEAK-HOUR UNIT A AM PM USE ADT IN OUT IN OUT 147 MFOU 1,176 19 75 83 35 APPENDIX F UNIT A PEAK HOUR TRIPS & TRIP DlSTRIBUTION ~ 8/88 FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC.---------~ 0001•1 -76 • ~ 8/88 1989 + A SERV1CE VOLUME AM I PM 342 385 DEMAND SPLIT AM I PM Cl. 3:.6:. 1989 43 24 1988 41 23 [:::iiuii1t::1i~tj.;~---+~~--1---i--~>--.....:.:' 9::8~7 4 22 48(19) 3 2il , ag ( 119, I 141(100) 1987 145 103 1988 150 106 1989 154 109 +UNrTA 158 127 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITION L , 06 ( 1,0, l 67 ( 149 7:3!) -9:45 At1 14:4S-17:30 PM IJ;IURSOAY 8-28-86 ,.../Dence TRAFFlC CONTROL CDCIICD 1-a,cna,----~ ... APPENDIX G 4 WAY STOP ( 1986 to 1989) + 3% GROWTH + UNIT A PEAK HOUR TRIPS FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH U.S.A. INC. .. 77 • 000187 ( l . 8/88 793(968}1 218 593 a, a, f'-lt) .., CDCDUIUI IO CO)CDl'-CDCDGll t::,na,a, z---J .., 0 -Q\ .., 1989 + A s,y,ce VOLUME M I PM 978 1.249 TIME CAY PM 84/16 l 649(846)] • 7:15 -9:45 AN 15:00-17:45 PM B-28-86 :: lRAFF1C CONTROL ~~~ • 4 WAY STOP OF TAMARACK AVENUE AT HIGHLAN DRIVE A.M (P.M) PE AK HOUR a,o::-ii":•w&-. ai10:,a, , .. EXlSTING TRAFFIC CONDITION APPENDIX H (1986 to 1990) + 3% GROWTH+ UNIT A PEAK HOUR TRIPS FIIZ 8/ICELL Y RANCH ,_ U.S.A. INC. -78 -0001,1 - r APPENDIX I ALL-WAY STOP L.O.S. APPROXIMATE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS LOS C S[RVICE VOLUME, VPH DEMAND NUMBER OF LANES SPLIT 2 BY 2 2 BY 4 4 BY 4 50/50 1,200 1,800 2,200 55/45 1 , 140 1,720 2,070 60/40 1,080 1,660 1,970 65/35 1,010 1,630 1,880 70/30 960 1 , 610 . · 1 , 820 SOURCE: 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL -CHAPTER 70/30 -2X4 60/40 -2X2 LOS V/C SERVICE VOLUME SERVICE VOLUME A 0-.60 1,200 810 B .61-.70 1. 400 945 C .71-.80 1,610 1. 080 D .81-.90 1 , 810 1,215 E .90-1.00 2,012 1,350 SOURCE: USA ESTIMATE A.M./P.M. PEAK HOUR SERVICE VOLUME APPROACH V~HICLES/HOUR YEAR INTERSECTION A.M. LOS P.M. 1986 *TAMARACK AVE.IHILLSIOE OR. 857 A 1,094 HILLSIDE DR./PARK DR. 269 A 298 1989 •TAMARACK AvE./H1LLSIDE DR. 978 A 1,2"49 HILLSIDE OR./PARK DR. 342 A 385 • Ta11arack Avenue can ~• r11trlp1d fir E/8 I. W /8 left t•rn laaH .. 10 LOS A A 'B A \.. FIIZ I/KELLY RANCH .,,.__ _______________ U.S.A. INC. __________ ,,,,, . 3/88 ZONE BO _79 • 000181 ZONE8E TABLE 6-A ROAD SEGMENT PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE (METHOD +2 ANALYSIS) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 LOCATION API PIii API PPI API PPI API PPI API PPI API PPI API PPI CANNON ROAD EL CAPIINO REAL -FARADAY AVE. A A A A B B C C A A N.A. N.A. (2 LANES) (2 LANES) (2 LAl'ES) (2 LAl'ES) (4 LAt£S) FARADAY AVE. -PASEO DEL NORTE A A A A B B C C A A N.A. N.A. (2 LANES) (2 LAt£S) (2 LAl'ES) (2 LAl'ES) (4 LANES) EL CAPIINO REAL TAPIARACI< AVE. -KELLY DR. A A A A A A A A A A B B C C (4 LAl'ES) (4 LAl'ES) (4 LAIIES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) (4 LANES) KELLY DR. -CANNON ROAD A A . A A ·A A A A A A B B C C (4 LANES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAt£S) (4 LANES) (4 LAl'ES) (4 LANES) CANNON RD. -COLLEGE BLVD. A A A A A A A A B B C C D D (4 LAtES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAtES) (4 LAt,ES) (4 LAt£5) LEGEND1 N.A. = NOT APPLICABLE • = l'ETtllO #1 ANALYSIS FMZ 8/KELL Y RANCH 1997 1998 API PPI M PPI N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. D D e• e• (4 LAt£S) (6 LAt£S) D D a• e• (4 LAtES) (6 LANES) c• c• c• c• (6 LAt£5) (6 LANES) ~-----U.S.A. INC. _________________________ __,,,, 000'1#11 ) C <C 0 cc z 0 z z <C (.) - COMMERCIAL DlRT AGRICULTURAL , I, I f l I I I D+<ci+-al I I I i I I I 1'2' 20· I 12· 6 rzl 12 I PASEO DEL NORTE PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS G'AOW'Tri MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-<:!TY OF CARLSBAD --KAUFMAN and BROAD ,.., -----· c,. _,. COMMERCIAL SOURCE : VTN SOUTHWEST, INC. ■ I tfl()f ,, .......... _ !aNa..,... COIi' tt,o, ,,__ (71•) .. ,.., c· < 0 a: z 0 z z < (.) -- I I I I I I 11. I 12·1 12· f'26' I I I I I I I I t,~,t,t,t 1 I I I 1 I I I I ,a 1101 12· 1 a I a· 10· EL CAMINO REAL SOURCE : VTN SOUTHWEST, INC. PROPOSED BUILDOUT CONDITIONS GAOWlH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM-crTY OF CARLSBAD ■ l ---· KAUFMAN and BROAO ----.... -CA - APPENDIX F School District Agreement SECURED AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER, DEVELOPER AND CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT~ THIS SECURED AGREEMENT is entered into this 5th day of -'O""""ca.a.to .... b_e __ r _______ , 198_1., by and between 1/ Kell Familv Trust No. 1 and Rancho A ua Hedionda Name of Legal Owner a Tr,ust and a Partnershio (Corporation, Partnership, Etc.) hereinafter referred to as "Owner," whose address and phone number is c /o Cal Communities, Inc. 18002 Sky Park Circle (Street) Irvine, Ca. 92714 714 559-6200 City, State, Zip Code Phone and Kel -Cal (Develooment Partners: Cal Communities & Kaufman and Broad} (Name of Developer~ a Partnership (Corporation, Partnershi~, Etc.) hereinafter referred to as "Developer," whose address is c lo Cal Communities, Inc. (Street) {City, State, Zip Code} 18007 Sky Park Circle Irvine, Ca. 92714 and (714) 559-6200 (Phone) CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT of San Diego County, California, hereinafter referred to as "District," located at 801 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. 23 -WITNESSETH: A. WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of the real property described on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein by reference, and hereafter referred to as "Property" 2/ and B. WHEREAS, the Property 1 ies within the boundaries of District; and C. WHEREAS, Developer has contracted with Owner to purchase the Property and proposes to construct 3/ a 1600 max. unit Planned Community (actual density expected to be approx. 1000± units) on said Property, which development carries the proposed name or address of Kelly Ranch (preliminary name) and is hereafter referred to as "Development"; and D. WHEREAS, Developer filed on the~ day of October 198 3, (or intends to file) wHh the County of San Diego and/or the City of Carlsbad a request for 4/ Specific / Master Pian and a Tentative Map E. WHEREAS, Owner, Developer and District recognize that school facilities and services will not be available to accommodate children who may subsequently move into the proposed development; and F. WHEREAS, Owner and Developer have requested of the District assurances that school facilities and services will be available to meet the needs of the future residents of 24 the development as it is presently proposed and the Developer h aware that the District cannot, and will not, be able to give Developer any such assurances without financial assistance to pay for such services and facilities; and G. ·WHEREAS, Owner and Developer agree to provide such financial assistance in accordance with the terms of this agreement and the District agrees to provide assurances that school facilities and services will be available to meet the needs of the future residents of the development as it is presently proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE as follows: 1. The Developer shall pay to the District the sum of One Thousand, One Hundred, Ninety-Six and no/100 Dollars ($1,196) (or whatever sum is in effec.t at the time buflding permits are issued) for each dwelling unit to be constructed in the Development. The numb~r of dwelling units to be constructed shall be determined from the approved subdivision map of the Development, as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The term "dwelling unit" as used in this Agreement means a place of residence and may be located in either a single or multiple dwelling unit building. Sucb payments shall be made in accordance with the following provisions: 1.1 The total amount due hereunder shall be paid to the District in installments equal to Sl,196.0O times the 25 number of dwelling units (or whatever swn is in effect at the time building permits are issued) for which building permits are issued until the total amount as specified in paragraph· 1 above has been paid, or until the agreement has been cancelled by mutual consent due to the abandonment of all_ of a portion of the Development. Such installments shall be due and payable to the District concurrent with application by Developer for issuance of said_ building pennits. 1. 2 Any payments not made by the Developer when due and payable shall bear annual interest at the rate of two (2) percentage points above the prime rate charged by the Bank of America at the time of default. 2. The Owner and Developer may in the future offer to donate a school site in lieu of all or part of the financial obligation agreed upon in paragraph 1 above, which offer the District shall consider but fs not obligated to accept. 3. To secure Owner's and Developer's obligations hereunder, Developer shall provide to District the securities called for in subparagraph 3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3: acceptable to Distrkt from an insurer in the sum of $_____ to insure of the terms of this agreement. 5/ 3.2 A bank or loan time certificate of in a form acceptable to deposit in the District as an irrevocable asignee for the and expressly providing that any interest 26 ~he p1 ope1 t, of depo:sito1, and the Bht1 kt :shall hc,e 110 1 ight:s te aft~ sueh inteFect. ii 3.3 Such other security as may be acceptable to the District. 5/ Deed of Trust 4. District agrees to provide school facilities and services which will be available to meet the needs of the future residents of the areas to be developed as described herein. District further agrees _to provide in writing for Developer, and upon his request, assurances necessary to enable Developer to comply with any requirements of public agencies as evidence of adequate school facilities and services sufficient to accommodate the needs of the developments herein described. 5. All obligations hereunder shall terminate in the event 6/ The prooosed applications are not approved by the City or other Governmental agency, or the owner decides not to build. and the District shall within ten (10) days after written notice to District by Developer, deliver to Developer necessary documents for releasing the security provided to District pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof. 6. Any notice from one party to the other shall be. in writing, and shall be dated and signed by the party giving such notice or by a duly authorized representative of such party. Any such notice shall not be effective for any purpose whatsoever unless served in one of the following manners: 6.1 If notice is given to the District, by personal delivery thereof to the District or by depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the District at the address 27 - set forth herein, enclosed in a sealed envelope· addressed to the District for attention of the Superintendent, postage prepaid and certified; 6.2 If notice is given to Owner, by personal delivery thereof to Own_er or by depositing the same in tile United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to Owner at the address set forth herein or at such other addresses as may have been designated, postage prepaid and certified. 6.3 If notice is given to Developer, by personal delivery thereof to Developer or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to Developer as may have been designated, postage prepaid and certified. 6. 4 If notice is given to a surety or other person, by personal delivery to such surety or other person or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to such surety or person at the address at which such surety or person lasts communicated to the party giving notice, postage prepaid and certified .. 7. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of, and shall apply to, the respective success~rs and assigns of Owner,Developer, and the District, and references to Owner, Developer, or the District herein shall be deemed to be referenced to and include their respective successors and assigns without specific mention of such successor~ and assigns. If Developer should cease to have any interest in the Property, all obligations of Developer hereunder shall terminate; provided, however, that any successor of Developer's 28 - interest in the Property shall have first assumed in writing the Developer's obligations hereunder and shall have complied with paragraph 3 hereof. At such time as Owner ceases to have any interest in the Property, all obligations of Owner hereunder shall terminate; provided, however. that if any successor to the Owner's interest in the Property is a stranger to this Agreement, such successor has first assumed the obligations of Owner in writing and shall have complied wHh paragr·aph 3 hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed in San Diego County, California as of the date first written above. DEVELOPER: KAUFMAN & B~D OF SOOI'HERN /i ~~, INC. Name Ken Glandt, Assistant SecretaJ:y STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNlV OF Ios Angeles SS. 22nd Septenber 83 · On this __ ___;;;....;.;. __ dcy of --~"'--'-.;._ ______ • 19_ . before me. the undersigned. o Notory Public in ond for soid County ond State. personally appeared __________ _ ~ persono:ry known to me (or croved to me on the basis of of sotisfcctorv evicence to be the ____ _ r P!es1dent. ond Ken Glandt cersononv kno·.vn to me < or proved to me or. ,5 the bcsis of sotisfoctorv evidence) to be tl"le Assistant Secretory of the corp::r~t,on tnot e1.ec;.;rec tne within instrument. and known to me ( or proved to meon the bosi5of sc:1:s'-::,c!::,r-, evidence) to~ t:ie cersons who executed the within instrum9nf on behalf of the corporotion tnerein no~e:,. and ::::kno-..... ie::_ied tc me tt'let such cor00roti0n execute:, the some. pursuant to its 10~. or a reso1ution o! its B:xirc of Directors V Ponder 1 Nome (Tvi»O or Printed) PR-4$ (10) Rev. 6-82 29 strict ia D: --'-...._ . - FOOTNOTES: 1/ Full information concerning the Owner and Developer should be included here, and the name of the Owner should be identical to that used by the Owner in holding title to.the property. 2/ The e~act legal description of the property should be set forth on Exhibit •A 0 • 3/ Insert the number of residential buildings to be constructed and describe the kinds and number of residential units to be constructed, e.g., 100 two-bedroom single family residen~es, 4 apartment buidlings consisting of 60 two-bedroom apartments, one mobilehome park with 200 mobilehome spaces, etc. 4/ State whether the Developer has or will apply for a rezoning and/or conditional use permit or some other permit or appli- cation. Where the property is to be rezoned, state the present zoning and the proposed zoning. Where an application number has been assigned by the County or the City, state the number. 5/ The proposed form of bond or time certificate of deposit should be submitted to the District before the Developer signs this Agreement to assure that the bond or certificate will be in a form satisfactory to the District when later deliv£red. 6/ Thiseventwill probably be a denial of a rezoning application or denial of approval of a proposed subdivision map, or because the owner decides not to build. • This form should be used when the Developer is purchasing the land from the legal owner of the property • 30 APPENDIX G Estimated Sewer Costs ( ESTIMATED SEWER COSTS BY PLANNING AREAS KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT 1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST A (Existing 24" B (Wetlands Area) C (Existing 24") D (Omitted Planning Area) E 8" Main 900' 25$/sf $ 22,500 24" Trunk 2,400' 55$/sf 132,000 Man Holes 10 2.000 20,000 -------= SUBTOTAL $174,500 F 24" Trunk 1,600' 55 88,000 Man Holes 1 2,000 2,000 -------= SUBTOTAL s 90,000 G 24" Trunk 1,200' 55 66,000 S" Main 400' 25 10.000 Man Holes 4 2,000 8,000 ------== SUBTOTAL $ 84,000 H 8" Main 400' 25 10,000 Man Holes 3 2,000 6,000 ---===== SUBTOTAL $ 16,000 I 8" Main 800' 25 20.000 Man Holes 4 2.000 8,000 ----•=== SUBTOTAL $ 28,000 (1)c1ty of San Diego Unit Prices ,- -- KELLY RANCH UNIT1 PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST 3 8 II Main 1,000' 25 $ 25,000 Man Holes 5 2,000 10,000 ---===== SUBTOTAL $ 35,000 K B" Main 200' 25 5,000 Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 9,000 L 8" MAIN 500' 25 12,500 Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 16,500 M 8 11 Main 300' 25 7,500 Man Holes 1 2,000 2,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 9,500 N 8" Main 350' 25 8,750 -Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 12,750 0 8 II Main 750' 25 $ 18,750 Man Holes 3 2,000 Q,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 24,750 p 8 II Main 250' 25 $ 6,250 Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 10,250 Q 8" Main 400' 25 $ 10,000 Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 14,000 - KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT1 ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST R 8" Main 300 1 25 $ 7,500 Man Holes 2 2,000 4,000 -=--•-== SUBTOTAL $11,500 ======== TOTAL AREAS A THRU R $535,800 -, APPENDIX H Water Design Parameters Estimated Water Costs Evans Point Reservoir. CIP Funding Water Facility Bonds - ESTIMATED WATER COSTS BY PLANNING AREAS KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST(~) COST A (Existing 1211 ) B (Wetlands Area) C (Existing ·1211 ) D Committed Planning Area) E 14 II Main 2,400' 36.50 s 87,600 F 1411 Main 800' 36.50 s 29,200 G 1411 Main 1,200' 36.50 s 43,800 10" Main 400' 25.40 10,160 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 53,960 - H 1411 Main 700' 36.50 $ 25,550 10" Main 500' 25.40 12,700 ======== SUBTOTAL $ 38 ,·250 I 1011 Main 550' 25.40 s 13,970 J 1011 Main 8-50' 25.40 $ 21,590 K 1011 Main 600' 25.40 s 15,240 L 1011 Main 500'-25.40 $ 12,700 M 1011 Main 300' .25. 40 $ 7,620 N 10" Main 400' 25.40 $ 10,160 0 10 11 Main 800' 25.40 $ 20,320 p 1011 Main 250' 25.40 $ 6,350 -------------------- (1)c1ty of San Diego Unit Prices KELLY RANCH PLANNING PROPOSED NUMBER OR UNIT ESTIMATED AREAS FACILITY LINEAR FEET COST COST Q 10 II Main 400' 25.40 $10,160 R 1011 Main 350' 25.40 $ 8,890 •======= TOTAL AREAS A THRU R $336,000 Macario Park 12 II 2,400 29.80 $ 71,520 Zone 8 16 11 1,400 43.20 $ 60,480 ======== TOTAL ZONE 8 $468,000 <Xl w Ta COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COST ESTIMATE PROJECT TITLE Acct. No. $1,200,000 Evans Point Reservoir ' Revenue Cost to Scheduled Expenditures for 5 yr. Period Cost Total Source Date M.F.C. $0 c.s. 0 C.R. 0 Dev. 0 Beyond Cost 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992 Estimate 140,000 0 100 ,_000 0 560,000 0 0 0 0 700~000 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 .0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 Description: Evans Point Reservoir is a 2 million gallon facility that will be utilized by development in the area, as well as, the southern section of the original \Ci~y service area. The District has selected a site for the reservoir that meets the hydraulic gradient requirements of the area. Construction of the tank ~ill Scheduling: I' re l 1 11d. 11 u r y work i 5 G ch c cl u 1 c d f or F. Y • 0 7 -0 0 w i t h construction anticipated to commence in F.Y. 88-89. 0 Revenue Sources: M.F.C. -Mapr Facilities Char!]0 Pnk:J by New Development _ Capital Surcharge -Chargo Placed on the Waler Rate to Pay for Rehabilitation of Existing Facilities Cily ncscrvcs -Rcvcnuo Genr.rnlcd for Rch,1bilil:-tlion ProJccls hy Waler Users in Originnl City Service. Area Ocvcloocr -Contrilmlion5 In Addition lo M.F.C. Chnrges nnd In-Tract facilities 1 ) APPENDIX -·· 1 .. · References I' ,-•• ( \ ... REFERENCES City of Carlsbad. City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan. September 16, 1986. Land Use Planning Office. Kelly Ranch Master Plan. Septem- ber 18, 1984. Iwanaga Associates, et. al. Macario Canyon Park Development Plan. December, 1981. Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Transportation Analysis for· Kelly Ranch and Facilities Management zone 8. February, 1987. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works Improvements in the City of Carlsbad. 1984. **APPENDIX J IS MISSING