Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 2017-0004; WEST COAST SELF STORAGE; GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS; 2017-05-01--' ... ... ... .. .. .. - RECON .. .... .. .. -... • • -- • - - • .. - - Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the West Coast Self-Storage Project, Carlsbad, California Prepared for West Coast Self-Storage Group 4012 148th Street Mill Creek, WA 98012 Contact: Mr. Jim Fitzpatrick Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 8696 May 1, 2017 Jack T. Emerson, Environmental Analyst RECEIVED MAY O 3 2017 CITY OF CARLSBAD FLAi\JNING DIVISION .. ... .. • • .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... -.. ... .. .. - .. .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summ.ary ................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 1.1 Understanding Global Climate Change ............................................................. 2 1.2 Greenhouse Gases of Primary Concern ............................................................. 2 Project Description ......................................................................................... 4 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 8 3.1 3.2 Environmental Setting ....................................................................................... 8 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................... 9 Significance Criteria .................................................................................... 16 Emissions Modeling ...................................................................................... 17 5.1 Methodology and Assumptions ........................................................................ 17 5.2 Emissions Modeling Summary ........................................................................ 20 G HG Impact Analysis ................................................................................... 21 6.1 6.2 GHG Emissions ................................................................................................ 21 Applicable Plans, Policies, and Regulations Intended to Reduce GHG Emissions .......................................................................................................... 22 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 23 8.0 References Cited ............................................................................................ 24 FIGURES 1: 2: 3: Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 5 Project Location on Aerial Photograph ......................................................................... 6 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................ 7 TABLES 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes ............................................. 3 California GHG Emissions by Sector in 1990, 2008, and 2014 ................................... 8 City of Carlsbad GHG Emissions by Sector in 2005 and 2011 .................................... 9 San Diego Gas & Electric Energy Intensity Factors ................................................... 19 Summary ofGHG Emission Calculation Methodology ............................................... 21 Project GHG Emissions Estimate ............................................................................... 22 ATTACHMENT 1: CalEEMod Output -Project Emissions West Coast Self-Storage Project Page i • • .. .. .. .. .. ---.. .. -- ... ... - .. • .. ... - • RECON Acronyms AB CAFE CalEEMod CalGreen CAP CAPCOA CARB CBC CCR CEC CEQA CH4 CO2 CO2E CPUC EO GHG GWP MMT MPO MT MWh N2O SB SCAQMD SDG&E U.S. EPA Assembly Bill Corporate Average Fuel Economy California Emissions Estimator Model California Green Building Standards Code Climate Action Plan California Air Pollution Control Officers Association California Air Resources Board California Building Code California Code of Regulations California Energy Commission California Environmental Quality Act methane carbon dioxide carbon dioxide equivalent California Public Utilities Commission Executive Order greenhouse gas Global warming potential million metric ton Metropolitan Planning Organizations metric ton megawatt hour nitrous oxide Senate Bill South Coast Air Quality Management District San Diego Gas & Electric U.S. Environmental Protection Agency West Coast Self-Storage Project Page ii Greenhouse Gas Analysis .. .. . - .. - • .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. - • ... ... ... .. - • -... • .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Executive Summary The proposed West Coast Self-Storage Project site is located at the southeast corner of El Camino Real and Cougar Drive in Carlsbad, California. The 1.48-acre project site has been graded previously but remains undeveloped. The project would construct a 79,992-square- foot self-storage facility. This report evaluates the potential global climate change impacts associated with the project. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act guidance, this analysis evaluates the significance of the project in terms of (1) its contribution of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to cumulative statewide emissions, and (2) whether the project would conflict with local and/or state regulations, plans, and policies adopted to reduce GHG emissions . Project GHG emissions were evaluated consistent with guidance from the City of Carlsbad (City) Climate Action Plan (CAP). As stated in the City's CAP, new development projects emitting less than 900 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2E) would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change. Projects that exceed the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion must demonstrate compliance with the CAP using the CAP Project Review Checklist. Project-related GHG emission sources include construction (off-road vehicles), mobile (on- road vehicles), area sources (fireplaces and landscape maintenance equipment), water and wastewater, and solid waste. Project emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2016.3.1. Emissions estimated in this report incorporate project compliance with applicable regulations including the 2016 Title 24 Part 6 (California Energy Code) and Part 11 (California Green Building Standards) requirements . The project would generate approximately 352 MT CO2E annually. Consistent with guidance from the City's CAP, as annual project emissions would be less than the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion, the level of impacts associated with the project's contribution of GHGs to cumulative statewide emissions would be less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, project GHG emissions would have a less than significant impact on the environment. In addition, the project would not conflict with the goals and strategies of local and state plans, policies, and regulations adopted to reduce GHG emissions. Thus, impacts on applicable policies, plans, and regulations would be less than significant . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 1 .. .. . -.. .. .. - • - • • ----.. -- - • .. .. • .. - RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 1.0 Introduction This report evaluates the significance of the West Coast Self-Storage Project (project) in Carlsbad, California, and its contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to statewide GHG emissions and GHG reduction targets. To evaluate the incremental effect of project development on statewide emissions and global climate change, it is important to have a basic understanding of the nature of global climate change . 1.1 Understanding Global Climate Change Global climate change is a change in the average weather of the earth, which can be measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. The earth's climate is in a state of constant flux with periodic warming and cooling cycles. Extreme periods of cooling are termed "ice ages," which may then be followed by extended periods of warmth. For most of the earth's geologic history, these periods of warming and cooling have been the result of many complicated interacting natural factors that include: volcanic eruptions that spew gases and particles (dust) into the atmosphere; the amount of water, vegetation, and ice covering the earth's surface; subtle changes in the earth's orbit; and the amount of energy released by the sun (sun cycles). However, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution around 1750, the average temperature of the earth has been increasing at a rate that is faster than can be explained by natural climate cycles alone. With the Industrial Revolution came an increase in the combustion of carbon-based fuels such as wood, coal, oil, natural gas, and biomass. Industrial processes have also created emissions of substances not found in nature. This in turn has led to a marked increase in the emissions of gases shown to influence the world's climate. These gases, termed "greenhouse" gases, influence the amount of heat trapped in the earth's atmosphere. Because recently observed increased concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere are related to increased emissions resulting from human activity, the current cycle of "global warming" is generally believed to be largely due to human activity. Of late, the issue of global warming or global climate change has arguably become the most important and widely debated environmental issue in the United States and the world. Because it is the collective of human actions taking place throughout the world that contributes to climate change, it is quintessentially a global or cumulative issue. 1.2 Greenhouse Gases of Primary Concern There are numerous GHGs, both naturally occurring and manmade. Each GHG has variable atmospheric lifetime and global warming potential (GWP). The atmospheric lifetime of the gas is the average time a molecule stays stable in the atmosphere. Most GHGs have long atmospheric lifetimes, staying in the atmosphere hundreds or thousands of years. GWP is a measure of the potential for a gas to trap heat and warm the atmosphere . Although GWP is related to its atmospheric lifetime, many other factors including chemical reactivity of the gas also influence GWP. GWP is reported as a unitless factor representing the potential for the gas to affect global climate relative to the potential of carbon dioxide West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 2 RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis (CO2). Because CO2 is the reference gas for establishing GWP, by definition its GWP is 1. Although methane (CH4) has a shorter atmospheric lifetime than CO2, it has a 100-year GWP of 25; this means that CH4 has 25 times more effect on global warming than CO2 on a molecule-by-molecule basis. The GWP is officially defined as (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [U.S. EPA] 2010): The cumulative radiative forcing-both direct and indirect effects- integrated over a period of time from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to some reference gas. GHG emissions estimates are typically represented in terms of equivalent metric tons (MT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2E). CO2E emissions are the product of the amount of each gas by its GWP. The effects of several GHGs may be discussed in terms of MT CO2E anq can be summed to represent the total potential of these gases to warm the global climate. Table 1 summarizes some of the most common GHGs. Carbon dioxide CO2 Methane (CH4)* 12.4 28 Nitrous oxide N2O 121 265 HFC-23 222 12,400 HFC-32 5.2 677 HFC-125 28.2 3,170 HFC-134a 13.4 1,300 HFC-143a 47.1 4,800 HFC-152a 1.5 138 HFC-227ea 38.9 3 350 HFC-236fa 242 8,060 HFC-43-1 0mee 16.1 1,650 CF4 50,000 6,630 C2F6 10,000 11,100 CaFs 2,600 8,900 C4F10 2,600 9,200 c-C4Fs 3,200 9,540 C5F12 4,100 8,550 CBF14 3 100 7 910 SF6 3 200 23 500 SOURCE: Int.ergovernmental Panel on Climat.e Change 2014. GWP = Global warmin ot.ential West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 3 84 264 10,800 2,430 6,090 3,710 6,940 506 5 360 6 940 4,310 4,880 8,210 6,640 6,870 7,110 6,350 5 890 17 500 • .. . -... -- .. ... - .. • - .. .. .. - -.. .. .. ... • .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis All of the gases in Table 1 are produced by both biogenic (natural) and anthropogenic (human) sources. These are the GHGs of primary concern in this analysis. CO2 would be emitted by the project due to the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicles (including construction), from electricity generation and natural gas consumption, water use, and from solid waste disposal. Smaller amounts of CH4 and nitrous oxide (N20) would be emitted from the same project operations. 2.0 Project Description The 1.48-acre project site is located at an undeveloped parcel at the southeast corner of El Camino Real and Cougar Drive in Carlsbad, California. The project would construct a 79,992-square-foot self-storage facility. The project would also include a driveway and 9 surface parking spaces . Figure 1 shows the regional location. Figure 2 shows an aerial photograph of the project vicinity. Figure 3 shows the proposed site plan . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 4 * Project Location REC ON M:\JOBSS\6696\common _gislfig 1.mxd 4/21/2017 sab land NF O Miles FIGURE 1 Regional Location O Feet c::J Project Boundary REC O N M:UOBS5186961common_gis\f,g2ghg.mxd 4/21/2017 sab FIGURE 2 Project Location on Aerial Photograph ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' •,,/ ,, ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ,'\ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ll I zl 0 u ~ RE CON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 3.0 Existing Conditions 3.1 Environmental Setting 3.1.1 State and Regional GHG Inventories The California Air Resources Board (CARB) performs statewide GHG inventories. The inventory is divided into nine broad sectors of economic activity: agriculture, commercial, electricity generation, forestry, high GWP emitters, industrial, recycling and waste, residential, and transportation. Emissions are quantified in million metric tons (MMT) of CO2E. Table 2 shows the estimated statewide GHG emissions for the years 1990, 2005, and 2014. 23.4 5% 34.45 7% Commercial 14.4 14.27 Electricit Generation 110.6 107.85 HihGWP 7.70 Industrial 103.0 24% 95.41 Rec clin and Waste 7.94 Residential 29.7 7% 27.98 Trans ortation 150.7 35% 184.21 Forest Net CO2 flux 5 -6.5 Not S ecified 1.3 TOTAL 426.6 479.81 SOURCE: CARB 2007 and 2016. MMT CO2E = million metric tons of CO2 equivalent 11990 data was retrieved from the CARB 2007 source. 2Quantities and percentages may not total properly due to rounding. 32005 and 2014 data was retrieved from the CARB 2016 source. 36.11 14.61 88.24 17.15 93.32 8.85 23.73 159.53 441.54 4Reported emissions for key sectors. The inventory totals for 2005 and 2014 did not include Forest or Not S ecified sources. As shown in Table 2, statewide GHG source emissions totaled about 427 MMT CO2E in 1990, 480 MMT CO2E in 2005, and 442 MMT CO2E in 2014. Many factors affect year-to- year changes in GHG emissions, including economic activity, demographic influences, environmental conditions such as drought, and the impact of regulatory efforts to control GHG emissions. However, transportation-related emissions consistently contribute the most GHG emissions, followed by electricity generation and industrial emissions. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 8 RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis A Carlsbad emissions inventory was prepared for years 2005 and 2011 as a part of the Carlsbad Climate Action Plan (CAP). The total community GHG emissions in 2005 were 630,310 MT C02E and the total community GHG emissions in 2011 were 705,744 MT C02E. Table 3 summarizes the sources and quantities of community emissions. The largest sector is transportation, followed by commercial and industrial, residential, solid waste, and wastewater. Tahl<' :1 Cit~ of' C'al'i-.had (;J-I(; Emi-.sion-. h~ Sl'cto1· in :WO,i and 2011 f· ' . , '"·'-· v, . t",• "'·~, l ,, Transportation 289,431 (46%) 273,745 (39%) Commercial/Industrial 170,041 (27%) 224,960 (32%) Residential 136,427 (22%) 176,405 (25%) Solid Waste 30,015 (5%) 24,317 (3%) Wastewater 4,397 (1%) 6,317 (1%) TOTAV 630,310 705,744 SOURCE: City of Carlsbad 2015a. 1Totals may vacy due to independent rounding. 3.1.2 On-Site GHG Emissions The project site is currently undeveloped and is not a source of GHG emissions. 3.2 Regulatory Background In response to rising concern associated with increasing GHG emissions and global climate change impacts, several plans and regulations have been adopted at the international, national, and state levels with the aim of reducing· GHG emissions. The following is a discussion of the federal, state, and local plans and regulations most applicable to the project. 3.2.1 Federal 3.2.1.1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The U.S. EPA has many federal level programs and projects to reduce GHG emissions. The U .S. EPA provides technical expertise and encourages voluntary reductions from the private sector. One of the voluntary programs applicable to the project is the Energy Star program. Energy Star is a joint program of U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy, which promotes energy-efficient products and practices. Tools and initiatives include the Energy Star Portfolio Manager, which helps track and assess energy and water consumption across an entire portfolio of buildings, and the Energy Star Most Efficient 2013, which provides information on exceptional products that represent the leading edge in energy-efficient products in 2013 (U.S. EPA 2013). West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 9 • ... .. • - • .. - -.. - ... .. -... RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 3.2.1.2 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards The federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards determine the fuel efficiency of certain vehicle classes in the United States. Current CAFE standards require vehicle manufacturers of passenger cars and light-duty trucks to achieve an average fuel economy of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 and an average fuel economy of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. With improved gas mileage, fewer gallons of transportation fuel would be combusted to travel the same distance, thereby reducing nationwide GHG emissions associated with vehicle travel. 3.2.2 State 3.2.2.1 Statewide GHG Emission Targets S-3-05-Statewide GHG Emission Targets This executive order (EO) establishes the following GHG emissions reduction goals for the state of California: • by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; • by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and • by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. This EO also directs the Secretary of the California EPA to oversee the efforts made to reach these targets, and to prepare biannual reports on the progress made toward meeting the targets and on the impacts to California related to global warming, including impacts to water supply, public health, agriculture, the coastline, and forestry. With regard to impacts, the report shall also prepare and report on mitigation and adaptation plans to combat the impacts. The first Climate Action Team Assessment Report was produced in March 2006, and has been updated every two years. B-30-15-2030 Statewide GHG Emission Goal This EO, issued on April 29, 2015, establishes an interim GHG emission reduction goal for the state of California to reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This EO also directs all state agencies with jurisdiction over GHG-emitting sources to implement measures designed to achieve the new interim 2030 goal, as well as the pre-existing, long- term 2050 goal identified in EO S-3-05. Additionally, this EO directs CARB to update its Climate Change Scoping Plan to address the 2030 goal. CARB is expected to develop statewide inventory projection data for 2030, as well as commence its efforts to identify reduction strategies capable of securing emission reductions that allow for achievement of the EO's new interim goal. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 10 .. ' • .. -.. • .. • - • -.. .. - • ... .. • • - • • • RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 3.2.2.2 Assembly Bill 32-California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 In response to EO S-3-05, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, and thereby enacted Sections 38500- 38599 of the California Health and Safety Code. The heart of AB 32 is its requirement that CARB establish an emissions cap and adopt rules and regulations that would reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. AB 32 also required CARB to adopt a plan by January 1, 2009, indicating how emission reductions would be achieved from significant GHG sources via regulations, market mechanisms, and other actions . 3.2.2.3 Senate Bill 32-California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Approved in September 2016, Senate Bill (SB) 32 updates the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Under SB 32, the state would reduce its GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. In implementing the 40 percent reduction goal, CARB is required to prioritize emissions reductions to consider the social costs of the emissions of GHGs; where "social costs" is defined as "an estimate of the economic damages, including, but not limited to, changes in net agricultural productivity; impacts to public health; climate adaptation impacts, such as property damages from increased flood risk; and changes in energy system costs, per metric ton of greenhouse gas emission per year." 3.2.2.4 Climate Change Scoping Plan As directed by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, in 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (Original Scoping Plan). CARB has periodically revised GHG emissions forecasts and prepared supplemental revisions to the Original Scoping Plan. Most recently, in 2014, CARB adopted the comprehensive First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update to the Scoping Plan) (CARB 2014). The First Update to the Scoping Plan" ... highlights California's success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050" (CARB 2014). The First Update to the Scoping Plan found that California is on track to meet the 2020 emissions reduction mandate established by AB 32, and notes that California could reduce emissions further by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, if the state realizes the expected benefits of existing policy goals (CARB 2014) . In conjunction with the First Update to the Scoping Plan, CARB identified "six key focus areas comprising major components of the state's economy to evaluate and describe the larger transformative actions that will be needed to meet the state's more expansive emission reduction needs by 2050" (CARB 2014). Those six areas are: (1) energy; (2) transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing, fuels, and infrastructure); (3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and (6) natural and West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 11 ... .. • .. - • -.. • ... • --.. .. .. • • - • ... .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis working lands. The First Update identifies key recommended actions for each sector that will facilitate achievement of the 2050 reduction goal. Based on CARB's research efforts, it has a "strong sense of the mix of technologies needed to reduce emissions through 2050" (CARB 2014). Those technologies include energy demand reduction through efficiency and activity changes; large-scale electrification of on-road vehicles, buildings and industrial machinery; decarbonizing electricity and fuel supplies; and the rapid market penetration of efficient and clean energy technologies . In January 2017, CARB released proposed The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, The Proposed Strategy for Achieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target (Draft Scoping Plan; CARB 2017). The comment period for the Draft Scoping Plan will last until March 2017. The Draft Scoping Plan identifies State strategy for achieving the State's 2030 interim GHG emissions reduction target codified by SB 32. The Draft Scoping Plan assessed three scenarios; (1) a Reference Scenario that represents current policies prior to the passage of SB 350 (i.e., October 2015); (2) a Proposed Scoping Plan Scenario (referred to as the "Draft Scoping Plan Scenario") that represents current policies, known commitments, as well as additional measures to reduce emissions from the refinery sector, and (3) an Alternative 1 Scenario that represents all policies and programs included in the Draft Scoping Plan Scenario, as well as additional prescriptive measures to meet the 2030 statewide reduction target without reliance on the Cap-and-Trade Program or a carbon tax . Measures under the Draft Scoping Plan Scenario build on existing programs such as the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Advanced Clean Cars Program, Renewable Portfolio Standard, Sustainable Communities Strategy, and the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, and the Cap-and-Trade Program. Additionally the Draft Scoping Plan proposes further strategies to reduce waste emissions through cogeneration, reduction of GHG emissions from the refinery sector by 20 percent, and new policies to address GHG emissions from natural and working lands. As discussed in the following section (Section 3.2.2.5), CARB continues adjust the cap of the Cap-and-Trade Program to achieve emission levels consistent with 2020 statewide GHG emissions reduction targets established by AB 32. Modeling for the Draft Scoping Plan Scenario does not reflect reductions achieved by the Cap-and-Trade Program . As identified in the Alternative 1 Scenario, prescriptive measures necessary to achieve the State's 2030 interim GHG reduction target without reliance on the Cap-and-Trade Program include a 5 percent renewable pipeline gas standard, a 25 percent reduction in GHG emissions from the oil and gas extraction sector, a 25 percent reduction in the GHG emissions from the industrial sector, 20 percent flexible demand response from residential and commercial electric appliances, an additional 7 percent increase in the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (from 18 to 25 percent), an additional 10 percent reduction from the refining sector (from 20 to 30 percent), an additional 10 percent increase to California Renewable Portfolio Standard (from 50 to 60 percent), increased building energy efficiency standards, and additional transportation demand measures. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 12 .. .. .. - • .. - - .. ... ... .. -- • .. • .. .. .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 3.2.2.5 Cap-and-Trade Program The California Cap-and-Trade Program began in January 2013 and is authorized to continue until the end of 2020. The program is a market-based regulation that is designed to reduce GHG emissions associated major sources by setting a firm cap on overall GHG emissions from covered entities and gradually reducing that cap over time. The program defines major sources as facilities that generate more than 25,000 MT CO2E per year, which includes many electricity generators, refineries, cement production facilities, oil and gas production facilities, glass manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants. Each entity covered by the program is allocated specific GHG emission allowances and is able to buy or sell additional offset credits to other major sources-covered entities. Thus, the program employs market mechanisms to cost effectively reduce overall GHG emissions. Throughout the program's duration, CARB continues to adjust the overall GHG emissions cap to achieve emission levels consistent with 2020 statewide GHG emission reduction targets established by AB 32 . 3.2.2.6 Regional Emissions Targets -SB 375 SB 375, the 2008 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, was signed into law in September 2008 and requires CARB to set regional targets for reducing passenger vehicle GHG emissions in accordance with the Original Scoping Plan. The purpose of SB 375 is to align regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emissions reduction targets and fair-share housing allocations under state housing law. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy or Alternative Planning Strategy to address GHG reduction targets from cars and light-duty trucks in the context of that MPO's Regional Transportation Plan. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65080(b)(2)(K), a Sustainable Communities Strategy does not: (i) regulate the use of land; (ii) supersede the land use authority of cities and counties; or (iii) require that a City's or County's land use policies and regulations, including those in a general plan, be consistent with it. Nonetheless, SB 375 makes regional and local planning agencies responsible for developing those strategies as part of the federally required metropolitan transportation planning process and the state-mandated housing element process. 3.2.2. 7 California Building Standards Code (Title 24) The California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, is referred to as the California Building Code, or CBC. It consists of a compilation of several distinct standards and codes related to building construction including, plumbing, electrical, interior acoustics, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility and so on. Of particular relevance to GHG emissions reductions are the CBC' s energy efficiency and green building standards as outlined below . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 13 .. .. .. - • .. ... .. -- -- -.. .. .. ---.. .. • RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Part 6 -Energy Code The CCR, Title 24, Part 6 is the Energy Efficiency Standards or California Energy Code. This code, originally enacted in 1978, establishes energy-efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings in order to reduce California's energy consumption. The Energy Code is updated periodically to incorporate and consider new energy-efficiency technologies and methodologies as they become available. New construction and major renovations must demonstrate their compliance with the current Energy Code through submission and approval of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the local building permit review authority and the California Energy Commission (CEC). By reducing California's energy consumption, emissions of statewide GHGs may also be reduced. The previous Energy Code, known as the 2013 Energy Code, became effective July 1, 2014. The current version of the Energy Code, known as the 2016 Energy Code, became effective January 1, 2017. The 2016 Energy Code provides mandatory energy-efficiency measures as well as voluntary tiers for increased energy efficiency. The CEC's preliminary estimates indicate that the 2016 Energy Code would achieve a 28 percent reduction in home energy use and a 5 percent reduction in non-residential energy use. The CEC has further indicated that the 2020 Energy Code will require new residential developments to achieve zero-net energy use . Part 11 -California Green Building Standards Code The California Green Building Standards Code, referred to as CalGreen, was added to Title 24 as Part 11 first in 2009 as a voluntary code, which then became mandatory effective January 1, 2011 (as part of the 2010 CBC). The 2016 CalGreen institutes mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up new construction of non- residential and residential structures. It also includes voluntary tiers (I and II) with stricter environmental performance standards for these same categories of residential and non-residential buildings. Local jurisdictions must enforce the minimum mandatory Green Building Standards and may adopt additional amendments for stricter requirements. The mandatory standards require: • Outdoor water use requirements as outlined in Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance emergency standards • 20 percent mandatory reduction in indoor water use relative to specified baseline levels; • 65 percent construction/demolition waste diverted from landfills; • Infrastructure requirements for electric vehicle charging stations; • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency; and • Requirements for low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring and particleboards. Similar to the reporting procedure for demonstrating Energy Code compliance in new buildings and major renovations, compliance with the CalGreen water reduction requirements must be demonstrated through completion of water use reporting forms for West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 14 -.. .. .. • -- .. .. .. • -.. .. .. .. .. -... RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis new low-rise residential and non-residential buildings. The water use compliance form must demonstrate a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use by either showing a 20 percent reduction in the overall baseline water use as identified in CalGreen or a reduced per-plumbing-fixture water use rate. 3.2.2.8 Other State Measures Other regulations adopted by California are summarized below. • Advanced Clean Cars Program (i.e., Pavley I and Low Emission Vehicle III) -A set of vehicle standards that require light-duty cars and trucks to have reduced GHG em1ss1ons. • Low Carbon Fuel Standard -A statewide goal requiring a 10 percent reduction in the carbon intensity of transportation fuels by 2020. • Renewables Portfolio Standard -Requires electrical providers achieve an energy mix of 33 percent renewable energy by 2020 and 50 percent renewable energy by 2030. • AB 341, Solid Waste Diversion -The Commercial Recycling Requirements mandate that businesses (including public entities) that generate 4 cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week and multi-family residential with five units or more arrange for recycling services. Businesses can take one or any combination of measures in order to reuse, recycle, compost, or otherwise divert solid waste from disposal. Additionally, AB 341 mandates that 75 percent of all solid waste generated in the state be reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020 regardless of the source. 3.2.3 Local 3.2.3.1 General Plan The Carlsbad City Council approved an update to the General Plan in September 2015. The City of Carlsbad General Plan includes strategies such as mixed-use development, higher density infill development, integrated transportation and land use planning, promotion of bicycle and pedestrian movements, and transportation demand management. It also includes goals and policies to promote energy efficiency, waste reduction, and resource conservation and recycling. 3.2.3.2 Climate Action Plan The Carlsbad CAP was approved and adopted along with the General Plan Update in September 2015 (City of Carlsbad 2015b). The CAP is designed to reduce Carlsbad's GHG emissions and streamline environmental review of future development projects in the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CAP includes actions to carry out the General Plan's goals and policies. The CAP contains goals, policies, and actions for Carlsbad to reduce GHG emissions and combat climate change, and includes: West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 15 -' .. - • -.. .. - --.. -.. ... • • • .. • • - • • RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis • An inventory of Carlsbad's citywide and local government GHG emissions; • Forecasts of future citywide and local government GHG emissions; • A comprehensive, citywide strategy and actions to manage and reduce GHG emissions, with emission targets through 2035; and • Actions that demonstrate Carlsbad's commitment to achieve state GHG reduction targets by creating enforceable measures, and monitoring and reporting processes to verify targets are met . 4.0 Significance Criteria The CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G Environmental Checklist, includes the following two questions regarding assessment of GHG emissions: 1) Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 2) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs? The CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt GHG thresholds of significance. When adopting these thresholds, the amended Guidelines allow Lead Agencies to develop their own significance thresholds and/or to consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided that the thresholds are supported by substantial evidence . Guidance from the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) report CEQA & Climate Change, dated January 2008, identifies several potential approaches for assessing a project's GHG emissions (CAPCOA 2008). Among these approaches the guidance introduces the concept of establishing thresholds based on GHG emission market capture rates. Screening criterion for a market capture rate approach should be low enough to capture a substantial fraction of future development and high enough to exclude small development projects that will contribute a relatively small fraction of the cumulative statewide GHG emissions. The CAPCOA guidance identifies a project-level screening criterion that would correspond to a 90 percent market capture rate and assesses potential advantages and disadvantages of evaluating projects against this threshold. Consistent with this approach, the City determined that new development projects emitting less than 900 MT CO2E GHG annually would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts, and therefore do not need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP (City of Carlsbad 2015a). As stated in the CAP, projects that exceed the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion shall comply with the CAP in one of two ways (City of Carlsbad 2015a): • Checklist Approach. The Project Review Checklist contained in the CAP provides direction about measures to be incorporated in individual projects, which will be West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 16 .. .. . .. .. -.. - .. .. ... • - • • .. • • • • .. .. .. ... - RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis used during the normal development review process. Project features that help a project meet the provisions of the CAP shall then become part of project conditions of approval. • Self-Developed Program Approach. Rather than use the standard checklist, project proponents can develop their own program that would result in the same outcome as the checklist. Appendix E of the CAP provides a non-exclusive list of potential mitigation measures that can be applied at the project level to reduce project-level GHG emissions. Other measures not listed in the Appendix may be considered, provided that their effectiveness in reducing GHG emissions can be demonstrated. The self-developed program approach and selection of mitigation measures shall be subject to City review and approval. 5.0 5.1 Emissions Modeling Methodology and Assumptions To evaluate the project's net GHG em1ss1ons, em1ss10ns were calculated using the CalEEMod 2016.3.1 (CAPCOA 2016). The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) program is a tool used to estimate air emissions resulting from land development projects based on California-specific emission factors. The model estimates mass emissions from two basics sources: construction sources and operational sources. CalEEMod can be used to calculate emissions from construction (off-road vehicles), mobile (on-road vehicles), area (fireplaces, consumer products [cleansers, aerosols, solvents], landscape maintenance equipment, architectural coatings), water and wastewater, and solid waste sources. GHG emissions are estimated in terms of total MT C02E. The analysis methodology and input data are described in the following sections. Where project-specific data were not available, model inputs were based on information provided in the CalEEMod User's Guide (CAPCOA 2016). The project was modeled with an operational year of 2020 to parallel the year of the City and State GHG reduction goals . 5.1.1 Construction Emissions Construction activities emit GHGs primarily though combustion of fuels (mostly diesel) in the engines of off-road construction equipment and through combustion of diesel and gasoline in on-road construction vehicles and the commute vehicles of the construction workers. Smaller amounts of GHGs are also emitted through the energy use embodied in water use for fugitive dust control. Every phase of the construction process, including demolition, grading, paving, and building, emits GHGs in volumes directly related to the quantity and type of construction equipment used. GHG emissions associated with each phase of project construction are calculated by multiplying the total fuel consumed by the construction equipment and worker trips by applicable emission factors. The number and pieces of construction West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 17 .. .. .. .. • • - -.. - .. .. .. - - • - .. .. .. .. RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis equipment are calculated based on the project-specific design. In the absence of project-specific construction information, equipment for all phases of construction is estimated based on the size of the land use. Standard construction equipment includes tractors/loaders/backhoes, rubber-tired dozers, excavators, graders, cranes, forklifts, rollers, paving equipment, generator sets, welders, cement and mortar mixers, and air compressors. Site grading would involve movement of soil on-site; cut and fill would be balanced, thus no soil would be imported or exported. Construction emissions were modeled using the following construction stages and lengths: site preparation (10 days), grading (20 days), building construction (230 days), paving (20 days), and architectural coatings (20 days). The estimates are based on surveys, performed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, of typical construction projects that provide a basis for scaling equipment needs and schedule with a project's size. Construction emissions are calculated for construction activity based on the construction equipment profile and other factors determined as needed to complete all phases of construction. Based on Guidance from the SCAQMD, total construction GHG emissions resulting from a project should be amortized over 30 years and added to operational GHG emissions to account for their contribution to GHG emissions over the lifetime of a project (SCAQMD 2009) . 5.1.2 Mobile Emissions GHG emissions from vehicles come from the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicle engines. Mobile emissions are estimated in CalEEMod by first calculating trip rate, trip length, trip purpose (e.g., home to work, home to shop, home to other), and trip type percentages for each land use type and quantity. Project trip generation rates were developed from Institute of Transportation Engineers' 8th Edition Trip Generation Handbook, which indicates that unrefrigerated warehouses typically generate 1.68 trips per 1,000 square feet (ITE 2008). Therefore, the project would generate 134 average daily trips. Standard countywide trip lengths for each trip type were used to determine total project vehicle miles traveled (CAPCOA 2016). The vehicle emission factors and fleet mix used in CalEEMod are derived from CARB's Emission Factors 2014 (EMFAC2014) model and account for the effects of applicable regulations such as the Advanced Clean Cars Program. 5.1.3 Energy Use Emissions Energy use emissions include direct emissions associated with the combustion of on-site fuel sources, such as natural gas, and indirect GHG emissions associated with the generation of electricity from fossil fuels off-site in power plants . Project energy use was estimated based on the size of the proposed land uses using data compiled from SCAQMD surveys and incorporated into CalEEMod. These surveys include the California Energy Commission-sponsored California Commercial End Use Survey and Residential Appliance Saturation Survey studies, which identify energy use by building type and climate zone. As the 2016 Title 24 had not been adopted when the CalEEMod West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 18 RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Version 2016.3.1 was revised, it does not account for 2016 Title 24. As the project construction would not begin until after January 1, 2017, the project would be subject to 2016 Title 24 requirements. Based on CEC estimates, compliance with 2016 Title 24 requirements is estimated to result in an additional 5 percent reduction in the project's Title 24 energy use. The project would be served by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). Therefore, SDG&E's specific energy-intensity factors (i.e., the amount of CO2, CH4, and N2O per kilowatt-hour) are used in the estimation of GHG emissions from project electricity demand. As discussed, the state mandate for renewable energy is 33 percent by 2020. However, the energy- intensity factors included in CalEEMod by default only represent a 10.2 percent procurement of renewable energy (SDG&E 2011). The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has indicated that SDG&E met and exceeded 2020 Renewable Portfolio Standard targets by achieving 35.2 percent in 2015 (CPUC 2017). Therefore project emission estimates were modeled accounting for reductions achieved by 35.2 percent renewable energy procurement. SDG&E energy intensity factors used in modeling are shown in Table 4. T:1lil1· I :-;,111 llll''...'.<l<:,1-& l·:l«t111 l·:11,·1'...'.\ 1111<-11-11\ 1·.1<1111- pr:;:i:•, ' ; . ·-~ ' 4. • • --r1 -. , .. . ., ;,:j i-' '" : J " ~ l \': 1' • I ,> I Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 720.49 519.91 Methane (CH4) 0.029 0.021 Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.006 0.004 SOURCE: SDG&E 2011; CPUC 2017. lbs= pounds; MWh = megawatt hour Emissions resulting from natural gas consumption were calculated in CalEEMod by multiplying natural gas consumption by standard emission factors published by the U.S. EPA's AP-42: Compilation of Air Emissions Factors. 5.1.4 Area Source Emissions Area sources include GHG emissions that would occur from the use of landscaping equipment. The use of landscape equipment emits GHGs associated with the equipment's fuel combustion. Landscaping equipment emission values were derived from the 2011 In-Use Off-Road Equipment Inventory Model (CARB 2011). 5.1.5 Water and Wastewater Emissions The amount of water used and wastewater generated by a project has indirect GHG emissions associated with it. These emissions are a result of the energy used to supply, distribute, and treat the water and wastewater. In addition to the indirect GHG emissions associated with energy use, wastewater treatment can directly emit both CH4 and N2O. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 19 RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis The indoor and outdoor water use consumption data for each land use subtype comes from the Pacific lnstitute's Waste Not, Want Not: The Potential for Urban Water Conservation in California 2003 (as cited in CAPCOA 2013). Based on that report, a percentage of total water consumption was dedicated to landscape irrigation, which is used to determine outdoor water use. Wastewater generation was similarly based on a reported percentage of total indoor water use (CAPCOA 2013). The project would be subject to 2016 Title 24 Part 11 standards (CalGreen), which require a 20 percent increase in indoor water use efficiency. Thus, in order to demonstrate compliance with CalGreen, a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use was included in the water consumption calculations for the project. In addition to water reductions under CalGreen, the GHG emissions from the energy used to transport the water are affected by the Renewables Portfolio Standard. As discussed previously, energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were reduced by 27.8 percent to account for increased renewable energy procurement (see Table 4). 5.1.6 Solid Waste Emissions The disposal of solid waste produces GHG emissions from anaerobic decomposition in landfills, incineration, and transportation of waste. To calculate the GHG emissions generated by disposing of solid waste for the project, the total volume of solid waste was calculated using waste disposal rates identified by California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. The methods for quantifying GHG emissions from solid waste are based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change method, using the degradable organic content of waste. GHG emissions associated with the project's waste disposal were calculated using these parameters. These California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery waste generation estimates do not reflect increased waste diversion achieved through compliance with AB 341, Commercial Recycling Requirements. AB 341 mandates that businesses institute certain waste diversion practices. Compliance with AB 341 requirements results in an average solid waste diversion increase of 25 percent. Although the project would comply with AB 341 requirements, this analysis conservatively does not account for reductions associated with AB 341 compliance. 5.2 Emissions Modeling Summary Table 5 provides a summary of the calculation methodology for each em1ss10n source calculated. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 20 RE CON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Tahh· ,> Summa,·~ of(;H(; Emi--sion Calculation :\h•tlwclolog~ Construction Construction emissions were amortized over 30 years and added to operational emissions. Vehicles Vehicle emissions were calculated using trip generation rates ITE trip generation rates for storage facilities and CARB vehicle emission factors for year 2020. Energy Energy calculations include increased energy efficiency (5 percent over 2016 Energy Code standards for non-residential buildings to account for Tile 24 2016). Additionally, to account for the effects of SDG&E's increased renewable energy procurement, the SDG&E energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were modified to reflect energy intensity factors shown in Table 4. Area Area-source emissions were calculated based on standard landscaping equipment and quantities and consumer product emission factors. The project would not include woodstoves or fireplaces. Water A 20 percent increase in indoor water use efficiency was included in the water consumption calculations in accordance with 2016 CalGreen standards. Additionally, SDG&E energy-intensity factors to account for the effects of SDG&E's increased renewable ener!!V. Solid waste Emissions were calculated using standard generation rates and emission factors, which are based on California Department of Resources Recvcling and Recoverv waste generation rates. 6.0 GHG Impact Analysis In accordance with CEQA and City guidance, this analysis evaluates the significance of the project in terms of (1) its contribution of GHGs to cumulative statewide emissions and (2) its consistency with local and state regulations, plans, and policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions. 6.1 GHG Emissions As discussed in Section 4.0, Significance Criteria, the City has determined that new development projects emitting less than 900 MT CO2E annual GHG would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts. A project that exceeds the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion shall demonstrate compliance with the CAP by using a checklist or developing a project-specific reduction strategy. Based on the methodology summarized in Section 5.1, Methodology and Assumptions, the primary sources of direct and indirect GHG emissions have been calculated. Table 6 summarizes the project emissions. The complete model outputs for the project are included in Attachment 1. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 21 RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Table· (i Projl'<'I (;I-1(; Emi-,-,ion-, E-.timat<· ~,··•l , __ .:.~ t: : •:t!. : '< ' "·\' 'e, ,,. ' . ,. 1, ,,,' i)..+f,,~ ..-~ . : i ·, ~· '101 • . ' Vehicles 164 Energy use 77 Area sources >1 Water use 66 Solid waste disposal 38 Construction 1 9 TOTAL 352 Note: Total may vary due to independent rounding. 1 Construction is estimated to generate 259 MT CO2E. Construction emissions were amortized over a 30-vear period. The project would generate approximately 352 MT CO2E annually. Emissions are projected to be less than the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion. By emitting less than 900 MT CO2E the project's contribution of GHGs to cumulative statewide emissions would be less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the project's direct and indirect GHG emissions would have a less than significant impact on the environment. 6.2 Applicable Plans, Policies, and Regulations Intended to Reduce GHG Emissions 6.2.1 Local Plans, Policies, and Regulations The Carlsbad City Council approved and adopted an update to the General Plan and the CAP in September 2015. As stated in the CAP, "the City has determined that new development projects emitting less than 900 MT CO2E annual GHG would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts, and therefore do not need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP" (City of Carlsbad 2015a). As the project GHG emissions would be below the screening criterion, it would not conflict with implementation of the CAP or interfere with the City's ability to achieve the GHG reduction goals outlined in the CAP. The project would not conflict with any local plan, policy, or regulation aimed at reducing GHG emissions from land use and development. Impacts would be less than significant. 6.2.2 State Plans, Policies, and Regulations As discussed in Section 3.2.2.1, EO S-3-05 establishes an executive policy of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Consistent with this policy, the legislature adopted AB 32, which codifies a GHG emissions reduction target of 1990 emission levels by 2020, and SB 32, which codifies a GHG emissions reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 emission levels by 2030. The 2050 emission reduction target of EO S-3- 05 has not been codified by the Legislature. West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 22 .. • -.. .. • • .. .. -.. • - • -- .. • - • -- RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis The 900 MT CO2E screening criterion was established so that small projects would not conflict with the state's AB 32 mandate for reducing GHG emission (CAPCOA 2008). As the project is below the screening criterion, it would not conflict with the AB 32 mandate for reducing GHG emissions at the state level. The project would emit less than 900 MT CO2E annually and therefore would not interfere with the City's ability to achieve the GHG reduction goals outlined in the CAP. Further, the project's 2020 emissions represent the maximum emissions inventory for the project, as project emissions would continue to decline from 2020 through at least 2050 due to regulatory requirements. Given the reasonably anticipated decline in project emissions, due to existing regulatory programs, once the project is fully constructed and operational, the project emissions would continue to decline in line with the GHG reductions needed to achieve the 2030 GHG emissions reduction target and the EO's horizon-year (2050) goals. Therefore, the project would not conflict with the long-term GHG policy goals of the state. As such, the project's impacts with respect to the state's 2020 and 2030 targets, or the state's post-2030 GHG emissions goals under EO S-3-05 would be less than significant. The project would not conflict with any state plan, policy, or regulation aimed at reducing GHG emissions from land use and development. Impacts would be less than significant . 7.0 Conclusions As summarized in Table 6, the project would result in GHG emissions of 352 MT CO2E per year. Since emissions are projected to be less than the 900 MT CO2E screening criterion, the level of impacts associated with contribution of GHGs to cumulative statewide emissions would be less than cumulatively considerable. In addition, the project would not conflict with the goals and strategies of local and state plans, policies, and regulations adopted to reduce GHG emissions. Thus, impacts associated with applicable policies, plans, and regulations would be less than significant . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 23 • .. .. • • .. - .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. -.. .. .. .. ... RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis 8.0 References Cited California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 2008 CEQA & Climate Change, Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act, January . 2016 California Emissions Estimator model (CalEEMod). User's Guide Version 2016.3.1 September . California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2007 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory -Summary by Economic Sector. Last updated November, 19 2007. Accessed April, 2014. 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_scoping_plan.pdf. December. 2011 In-Use Off-Road Equipment (Construction, Industrial, Ground Support, and Oil Drilling) 2011 Inventory Model. 2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan. Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32 -The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May 2014 . 2016 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2014 -by Category as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan. Last updated March 30, 2016 . 2017 The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, The Proposed Strategy for Achieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. January 20, 2017 . California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) 2017 California Public Utilities Commission Webpage, California Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Homepage. Accessed March 10, 2017 at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/RPS_Homepage/ . Carlsbad, City of 2015a Climate Action Plan. September 2015. 2015b City of Carlsbad General Plan and Climate Action Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. SCH# 2011011004. June 2015. Certified September 22, 2015 . Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 2008 Trip Generation Handbook. 8th Edition . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 24 • .. --- • • • • • • • • • • .. • .. .. • - • - -.. .. .. - RECON Greenhouse Gas Analysis Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2014 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report . San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) 2011 March 2011 Semi-Annual Compliance Report Pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard. Filed March . South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2009 Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group 14. November 19, 2009 . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 2010 Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, Office of Atmospheric Programs. 430-R-10- 006. April 15 . 2013 Energy Star. http://www.energystar.gov Accessed July 2, 2013 . West Coast Self-Storage Project Page 25 • --- • • • • - • • • • • - • • • • .. ---... • • - • .. .. .. ,. - • .. • • • RECON ATTACHMENT 1 CalEEMod Output- Project Emissions West Coast Self-Storage Project Greenhouse Gas Analysis - - Summary Book 11111 GHG Emissions Estimate (MTC02e) Project -Mobile 164 Enerov 77 Area 0 Water 66 .. Waste 38 Amortized Construction 9 Total 352 - .. • .. • - -.. --.. .. -- -.. 411 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/24/2017 4:06 PM West Coast Self Storage Project -San Diego County, Annual West Coast Self Storage Project San Diego County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Uses iZe 1e· Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 80.00 1000sqft 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (mis) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 40 Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric CO2 Intensity 519.91 CH4 Intensity 0.021 N20 Intensity 0.004 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics -As of 2015 SDG&E has already achieved 2020 RPS goals. Energy intensity factor revised to account for 35.2 percent renewables Land Use -Proposed building is 79,992 square feet, rounded to 80 ksf. Grading -Cut/fill would be balanced on-site. Architectural Coating -SDAPCD Rule 67.0 Area Coating -SDAPCD Rule 67.0 Energy Use -Redcued by 5 percent to reflect 2016 Title 24 requirements. 0.92 -> 0.87, 1.57 -> 1.49 Water Mitigation -CalGreen requirements able Name ·aultValue tblArchitecturalCoating 250.00 alue 150.00 opulation 0 tblArchitecturalCoating tblArchitecturalCoating tblAreaCoating tblAreaCoating tblAreaCoating tblEnergyUse tblEnergyUse tblProjectCharacteristics tblProjectCharacteristics tblProjectCharacteristics tblProjectCharacteristics 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction l'(l)u NUX Year 2018 Ii 0.7096 2.0454 ;; Maximum 0.7096 2.0454 Mitigated Construction EF _Nonresidential_lnterior 250.00 EF_Parking 250.00 Area_EF _Nonresidential_Exterior 250 Area_EF _Nonresidential_lnterior 250 Area_EF _Parking 250 T24E 0.92 T24NG 1.57 CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 OperationalYear 2018 1..U :su2 Fugitive I Elchiuat I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhiust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 tDns,yr 1.6256 f 2.9900e-0.0525 l 003 0.1137 l 0.1662 1.6256 I 2.99ooe-I 0.0525 I 0.1131 I 0.1662 003 0.0180 0.1095 0.0180 0.1095 100.00 150.00 150 100 150 0.87 1.49 0.021 519.91 0.004 2020 ;~5 r~ C02 rBM>-~U2l'OUJ 1..U2 1.,11'1 N20 une Ml/yr 0.1276 0.0000 j 257. 7646 j 257. 7646 0.0442 0.0000 258.8689 ; i I 0.1276 0.0000 l 251.7646 T257.7646 T o.0442 T 0:0000 I 258.8689 I I ear 2018 Maximum Percent Reduction wuarter 1 2 3 0.7096 2.0454 0.7096 2.0454 0.00 0.00 ..... rtoate 1-1-2018 4-1-2018 7-1-2018 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational l'(V\:j NUX \A"'IIOIY Area 0.3542 1.0000e- 005 Energy 6.9000e-6.2700e- 004 003 Mobile 0.0448 0.2017 Waste Water 1.6256 2.9900e- 003 1.6256 2.9900e- 003 0.00 0.00 CRUUIIIII 3-31-2018 6-30-2018 9-30-2018 Highest \,U ;:,u.: 7.4000e-0.0000 004 5.2700e-4.0000e- 003 005 0.5429 1.7700e- 003 0.0525 0.1137 0.1662 0.0180 0.1095 0.0525 0.1137 0.1662 0.0180 0.1095 PM10 Total PM2.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 unmllllVl'W"' ".,.. + nuA .......-quanar, 0.7029 0.7166 0.7245 0.7245 l"IJIIIIM' CJlllllust l"'M10 FugitiVe Cl01aust PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SJ!lllyr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e- 004 004 004 0.1479 1.7800e-0.1497 0.0396 1.6700e- 003 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 0.0000 257.7643 257.7643 0.0442 0.0000 258.8687 0.1276 0.0000 257.7643 257.7643 0.0442 0.0000 258.8687 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maxmum 111,ugau,u ".,.. + nuA ,wn8/quarterJ 0.7029 0.7166 0.7245 0.7245 l"'M.1:.5 Bio-... u2 ri,io-... u.: 1 , OUII ... u2 "'"4 N.:U \,U.:e Total M yr 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 4.8000e-0.0000 76.2581 76.2581 2.9400e-6.6000e-76.5280 004 003 004 0.0413 0.0000 163.4062 163.4062 8.8600e-0.0000 163.6277 003 0.0000 15.2649 0.0000 15.2649 0.9021 0.0000 37.8182 0.0000 5.8692 56.8081 62.6773 0.6051 0.0147 82.1772 Total 0.3997 0.2080 0.5489 1.8100e-0.1479 2.2600e-0.1502 0.0396 2.1500e-0.0418 21.1341 296.4738 317.6079 1.5191 0.0153 360.1525 003 003 003 Mitigated Operational I ~U\> r4UX \,U ;:,u.< Fugitive cmaust l"'MlU Fugitive cxnaust l"'M.<.5 BIO-1.,U.< I r4tsl0-1.,U.<I I OIIII l.,U.< CH4 1"4.lU l.,U.l8 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I l..8tegory IDnaiyr M ,yr Area 0.3542 1.0000e-7.4000e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 005 004 003 003 003 Energy 6.9000e-6.2700e-5.2700e-4.0000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-0.0000 76.2581 76.2581 2.9400e-6.6000e-76.5280 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 003 004 Mobile 0.0448 0.2017 0.5429 1.7700e-0.1479 1.7800e-0.1497 0.0396 1.6700e-0.0413 0.0000 163.4062 163.4062 8.8600e-0.0000 163.6277 003 003 003 003 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.2649 0.0000 15.2649 0.9021 0.0000 37.8182 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6954 45.4465 50.1418 0.4841 0.0117 65.7417 Total 0.3997 0.2080 0.5489 1.8100e-0.1479 2.2600e-0.1502 0.0396 2.1500e-0.0418 19.9603 285.1122 305.0725 1.3980 0.0124 343.7171 003 003 003 I KUU NUll l,U -rugiaw .. _ t"M1U l'ugRlft ll:Xllllust ~-11 -~ ,oea, .. u. ..... ...... \#U.W PM10 PM10 Total PM2.I PM2.I Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.55 3.83 3.95 7.97 19.11 4.56 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Constr_ucti_Qn Phase t'nase l"nase Name Phase lype ~,art Date r:na Date NUffl Days Num Days t'nase uescrtptton Number Week 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2018 1/2/2018 5 2 2 Grading Grading 1/3/2018 1/8/2018 5 4 3 Building Construction Building Construction 1/9/2018 10/15/2018 5 200 4 Paving Paving 10/16/2018 10/29/2018 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coaling 10/30/2018 11/12/2018 5 10 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: 120,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 40,000; Striped Parking Area: OffRoad E9.!!.!B_ment 1-'llase Name Site Preparation Site Preparation Site Preparation Grading Grading Grading Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Architectural Coaling Paving Paving Paving Paving Paving TriQ_s and VMT Site Preparation unroaa Equipment Type Graders Rubber Tired Dozers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Graders Rubber Tired Dozers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Cranes Forklifts Generator Sets Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Welders Air Compressors Cement and Mortar Mixers Pavers Paving Equipment Rollers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3l l a.001 1 0.001 Amount 0.001 1 Usage Hours 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.80i 8.00 7.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 6.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 7.301 I Horse Power 187 247 97 187 247 97 231 89 84 97 46 78 9 130 132 80 97 20.00l LD Mix I - Load Factor 0.41 0.4( 0.3i 0.41 0.40 0.3, 0.29 0.2( 0.74 0.37 0.45 0.48 0.56 0.42 0.36 0.38 0.37 Class :HDT_Mix 18Ullng Vehicle Class lHHDT I Grading 3 8.00 Building Construction 7 34.00 Architectural Coating 1 7.00 Paving 5 13.00 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Site Preparation -2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site KVu NVX l.iV 1.,ategoly Fugitive Dust Off-Road 1.8100e-0.0208 8.0800e- 003 003 Total 1.8100e-0.0208 8.0800e- 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site KUl,:j NVX l.iV 1.,ategory Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e-3.0000e-2.6000e- 005 005 004 l:IV;t 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 ;:,v2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 Fugmve t:JCnaUSt PM10 PM10 tons,yr 5.8000e-0.0000 003 9.5000e- 004 5.8000e-9.5000e- 003 004 Fugmve t:JCnaUSt PM10 PM10 lon"Yf 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0000e-0.0000 005 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT l'MlU Fugmve 1::xnaust l'M;t.5 Bi0-1.iV;t rttl0-1.iV;t 1 Total l.iV2 CH4 N;tV l.iV;t9 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total M ryr 5.8000e-2.9500e-0.0000 2.9500e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 9.5000e-8.8000e-8.8000e-0.0000 1.5743 1.5743 4.9000e-0.0000 1.5866 004 004 004 004 6.7500e-2.9500e-8.8000e-3.8300e-0.0000 1.5743 1.5743 4.9000e-0.0000 1.5866 003 003 004 003 004 l'M10 Fugmve t:xnaust l'-.5 Bio-l.iV2 rttio-1.iV2 Total 1.iV2 1.iM4 N20 1.v2e TOIIII PM2.5 PM2.5 Total M yr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0000e-2.0000e-0.0000 2.0000e-0.0000 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 0.0000 0.0618 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e-3.0000e-2.6000e-0.0000 6.0000e-0.0000 6.0000e-2.0000e-0.0000 2.0000e-0.0000 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 0.0000 0.0618 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site "vu NUX l,;U l:>U.! Fugitive t:lCIIIIUSt l'M10 Fugitive t:lCllllUSt l'M.!.5 ISi()-l.;U.! rtllO-l.;U.! 1 Total \j\J.l l.;M4 N.!U l.;U.!9 PM10 PM10 Tola! PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category wnwyr M "ff Fugitive Dust 5.8000e-0.0000 5.8000e-2.9500e-0.0000 2.9500e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 003 Off-Road 1.8100e-0.0208 8.0800e-2.0000e-9.5000e-9.5000e-8.8000e-8.8000e-0.0000 1.5743 1.5743 4.9000e-0.0000 1.5866 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 1.8100e-0.0208 8.0800e-2.0000e-5.8000e-9.5000e-6.7500e-2.9500e-8.8000e-3.8300e-0.0000 1.5743 1.5743 4.9000e-0.0000 1.5866 003 003 005 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site "VU rtV>< \,V i>V" ruunms ...... uat l'MlU Fug...,,., c-ust ..... ".:, tllO-.. v" rDIO-.. v"I 'ota, .. v" .,.,.. N.!U l.;U.!9 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total c.;ategory toll ryr M 'I' Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e-3.0000e-2.6000e-0.0000 6.0000e-0.0000 6.0000e-2.0000e-0.0000 2.0000e-0.0000 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 0.0000 0.0618 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 3.0000e-3.0000e-2.6000e-0.0000 6.0000e-0.0000 6.0000e-2.0000e-0.0000 2.0000e-0.0000 0.0617 0.0617 0.0000 0.0000 0.0618 005 005 004 006 005 006 006 3.3 Grading -2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site l'IVU l'IUX \,,U .:>Uit Fugitive cxnalllt l'M10 FUQIIIW cxnaust l'M2.5 Bio-1.,u-.: rt:110-1.,u2 Total 1.,u-.: 1.,M'J N2O 1.,u2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category D1 ryr M ,yr Fugitive Dust 9.8300e-0.0000 9.8300e-5.0500e-0.0000 5.0500e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 003 Off-Road 2.9900e-0.0341 0.0135 3.0000e-1.5900e-1.5900e-1.4600e-1.4600e-0.0000 2.5787 2.5787 8.0000e-0.0000 2.5988 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 Total 2.9900e-0.0341 0.0135 3.0000e-9.8300e-1.5900e-0.0114 5.0500e-1.4600e-6.5100e-0.0000 2.5787 2.5787 8.0000e-0.0000 2.5988 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site KUu rlUX \,,U <OU-' l"UQIUYlt CNIIIIUlt r"MIU l"llglUYlt cmaust r"M-'.l> DK>-'-U"' I"'""'" \,,Viti Total \,,U2 "'" .. l'litU \,,Uit8 PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1.iategoly wna,yr-M ,,yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.0000e-5.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 1.3000e-0.0000 1.3000e-3.0000e-0.0000 3.0000e-0.0000 0.1235 0.1235 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Total 7.0000e-5.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 1.3000e-0.0000 1.3000e-3.0000e-0.0000 3.0000e-0.0000 0.1235 0.1235 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ·e ategory Fugitive Dust Off-Road 2.9900e-0.0341 0.0135 003 Total 2.9900e-0.0341 0.0135 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site t<Vu NVX vU l;ategoly Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Wor1<.er 7.0000e-5.0000e-5.2000e- 005 005 004 Total 7.0000e-5.0000e-5.2000e- 005 005 004 3.4 Building Construction -2018 UILmitigated Construction On-Site ategoly Off-Road 0.2592 1.7428 1.3877 Total 0.2592 1.7428 1.3877 9.8300e-0.0000 9.8300e- 003 003 3.0000e-1.5900e-1.5900e- 005 003 003 3.0000e-9.8300e-1.5900e-0.0114 005 003 003 :.v" Fugitive cxnault t'M10 PM10 PM10 Total ...., ,yr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3000e-0.0000 1.3000e- 004 004 0.0000 1.3000e-0.0000 1.3000e- 004 004 2.2000e-i 0.1058 ; 0.1058 003 2.2oooe-i 0.1058 i 0.1058 003 5.0500e-0.0000 5.0500e-0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 1.4600e-1.4600e-0.0000 2.5787 2.5787 8.0000e-0.0000 2.5988 003 003 004 5.0500e-1.4600e-6.5100e-0.0000 2.5787 2.5787 8.0000e-0.0000 2.5988 003 003 003 004 FugllMI cmaust t'M.:.5 Bi0-1.,u2 ri,io-1.,u,tl Total 1.,u2 1.,M4 N.tU 1.,u2e PM2.5 PM2.5 Total M yr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.0000e-0.0000 3.0000e-0.0000 0.1235 0.1235 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 005 005 3.0000e-0.0000 3.0000e-0.0000 0.1235 0.1235 0.0000 0.0000 0.1236 005 005 0.1022 0.1022 ; 0.0000 184.2346 184.2346 0.0371 i 0.0000 ! 185.1618 ~ ~ 0.1022 I 0.1022 I 0.0000 184.2346 184.2346 0.0311 I 0.0000 I 185.1618 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site nuu NUX \,U .::,u.: FUQIIMI cxnaust l'M10 FUQIIMI t:xnaust l'M2.5 BIO-\,U2 rBiO-\,U"l 1 otal \,U2 CH4 N.:U .... u..:e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1.;ategory toll ,yr M /yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8200e-0.1735 0.0477 3.6000e-8.6300e-1.3500e-9.9800e-2.4900e-1.2900e-3.7800e-0.0000 34.7956 34.7956 2.8700e-0.0000 34.8673 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 003 Wor1<er 0.0145 0.0115 0.1104 2.9000e-0.0273 2.0000e-0.0275 7.2500e-1.9000e-7.4300e-0.0000 26.2404 26.2404 9.1000e-0.0000 26.2630 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0214 0.1850 0.1581 6.5000e-0.0359 1.5500e-0.0375 9.7400e-1.4800e-0.0112 0.0000 61.0360 61.0360 3.7800e-0.0000 61.1303 004 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ~ -Road 0.2592 1.7428 1.3877 2.2000e-i i 0.1058 , 0.1058 003 0.1022 1 0.1022 i 0.0000 1184.2344 184.2344 0.0371 T o.0000 185.1616 i Total 0.2592 1.7428 1.3877 2.2oooe-i i 0.1058 i 0.1058 0.1022 I 0.1022 I 0.0000 I 184.2344 184.2344 0.0371 I 0.0000 185.1616 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site I I ~ 'l'ffl'x ffl ~ FugiUCe I Must I PM10 PM10 PM10 Total ri;m= PM2.5 @:.:~t 1 ;':} 1 BK>-602 rBK>-602 1 Total 602 1 ~ Jlffl ~ category tonS/YI' Ml/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.8200e-0.1735 0.0477 3.6000e-8.6300e-1.3500e-9.9800e-2.4900e-1.2900e-3.7800e-0.0000 34.7956 34.7956 2.8700e-0.0000 34.8673 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 003 Worker 0.0145 0.0115 0.1104 2.9000e-0.0273 2.0000e-0.0275 7.2500e-1.9000e-7.4300e-0.0000 26.2404 26.2404 9.1000e-0.0000 26.2630 004 004 003 004 003 004 Total 0.0214 0.1850 0.1581 6.5000e-0.0359 1.5500e-0.0375 9.7400e-1.4800e-0.0112 0.0000 61.0360 61 .0360 3.7800e-0.0000 61.1303 004 003 003 003 003 3.5 Paving -2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site rsvu NVX l.,U :.u2 FIIQIIMI t:X118Ust t'M10 l"UQIIMI t:Xl18USt t'M2.5 Bio-1.,u2 INt1io-1.,u2 Total 1.,u2 CH4 N20 1.;u2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Catiegory "'" ,yr M Jr Off-Road 5.0900e-0.0523 0.0450 7.0000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-2.8100e-2.8100e-0.0000 6.1073 6.1073 1.8700e-0.0000 6.1540 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.0900e-0.0523 0.0450 7.0000e-3.0500e-3.0500e-2.8100e-2.8100e-0.0000 6.1073 6.1073 1.8700e-0.0000 6.1540 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site rsvu NVX \,;U :.u-..: Fugitive t:Xll8IIS1 t'M10 Fugiuve t:Xl18USt .. ,.,.,,:, CHO• \,V2 l"'"'io-\,V2 1 otal \,V,< \,;M4 N20 1.;u2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total """'11"'1 "'" ,yr M 'JJ Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-2.2000e-2.1100e-1.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 5.3000e-1.4000e-0.0000 1.4000e-0.0000 0.5017 0.5017 2.0000e-0.0000 0.5021 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.8000e-2.2000e-2.1100e- 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site KUI.> l'fUX 1.iU 1,;ategory Off-Road 5.0900e-0.0523 0.0450 003 Paving 0.0000 Total 5.0900e-0.0523 0.0450 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site l'<UI.> l'fUX l.iU 1,;ategory Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.B000e-2.2000e-2.1100e- 004 004 003 Total 2.8000e-2.2000e-2.1100e- 004 004 003 3.6 Architectural Coating -2018 Unmi!!gated Constru_ction On-Site 1.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 005 004 ;:,u.: Fugitive l:JQlBUSt PM10 PM10 lOlla,yr 7.0000e-3.0500e- 005 003 0.0000 7.0000e-3.0500e- 005 003 ;:,u.: FugRM9 cxnaust PM10 PM10 tons/yr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 005 004 1.0000e-5.2000e-0.0000 005 004 5.3000e-1.4000e-0.0000 1.4000e-0.0000 0.5017 0.5017 2.0000e-0.0000 0.5021 004 004 004 005 t"M10 FugRM9 cxnaust t"M.C.5 BIO-1.iU2 r.,10-1.iU.C 1 Total 1.iU2 CH4 l'f.CU \,U28 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total M ,yr 3.0500e-2.8100e-2.8100e-0.0000 6.1073 6.1073 1.8700e-0.0000 6.1540 003 003 003 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.0500e-2.8100e-2.8100e-0.0000 6.1073 6.1073 1.8700e-0.0000 6.1540 003 003 003 003 t"M10 FugRM9 cxnaust t"M.C.5 l:SIO-1,;U.C r!JIO-l.iV.l 1 Total 1,;V.l 1,;M4 l'f.:V l.iV28 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total M ,yr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3000e-1.4000e-0.0000 1.4000e-0.0000 0.5017 0.5017 2.0000e-0.0000 0.5021 004 004 004 005 5.3000e-1.4000e-0.0000 1.4000e-0.0000 0.5017 0.5017 2.ooooe-0.0000 0.5021 004 004 004 005 l<VU l'IVX \,V .::,v2 fugitive CllllllUlt t'M10 fugilive CllllllUSt t'M2.5 Bio-1.,v2 rDio-\,V,tl Total 1.,v2 CH4 N2O \..V2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category wns,yr M ryr Archit. 1.;oating 0.4172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4900e-0.0100 9.2700e-1.0000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e-0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 0.4186 0.0100 9.2700e-1.0000e-7.5000e-7.S000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e-0.0000 1.2797 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Unmitigated C~:>nstruction Off-Site l<Vu l'IVX \,V .::,v" fugilive CllllllUlt t'MlU fUQIIMt CllllllUSt t'M2.5 BiO-'-U-' ll'IDIO-'-U"I Total \..u2 CH4 1'1-'U \,U,te PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5 PM2.5 Total category wns,yr M JJ Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5000e-1.2000e-1.1400e-0.0000 2.8000e-0.0000 2.8000e-7.0000e-0.0000 8.0000e-0.0000 0.2701 0.2701 1.0000e-0.0000 0.2704 004 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Total 1.5000e-1.2000e-1.1400e-0.0000 2.8000e-0.0000 2.8000e-7.0000e-0.0000 8.ooooe-0.0000 0.2701 0.2701 1.0000e-0.0000 0.2704 004 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site i2e ategory Archit. Coating 0.4172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4900e-0.0100 9.2700e-1.0000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e-0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Total 0.4186 0.0100 9.2700e-1.0000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-7.5000e-0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e-0.0000 1.2797 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site KV(; NVX 1.iV l>V-.l Fug11111e e><r111Ult r-M10 t-UQIIMI CJ<IIIIUSt r-M2.5 BIO-1.,v;;: rDIO-1.,v2 T olal 1.,v2 1.,n4 N4:V 1.,v.:e PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Categoly DI,.,.. M ,yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5000e-1.2000e-1.1400e-0.0000 2.8000e-0.0000 2.8000e-7.0000e-0.0000 8.0000e-0.0000 0.2701 0.2701 1.0000e-0.0000 0.2704 004 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 ' Total 1.5000e-1.2000e-1.1400e-0.0000 2.8000e-0.0000 2.8000e-7.0000e-0.0000 8.0000e-0.0000 0.2701 0.2701 1.0000e-0.0000 0.2704 004 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile >Ze iliigoiy Mitigated 0.0448 0.2017 0.5429 ! 1.7700e-i 0.1479 1.7800e-0.1497 . 003 ' 003 o.0396 1 1.67ooe-o.0413 003 o.oooo-T1s3.4052 163.4062 s.ssooe-0.0000 163.6277 I 003 i: Unmitigated 0.0448 0.2017 0.5429 I 1.1;it I 0.1479 I 1.1ii:e-0.1497 ! ' ' 4.2 Trip Summary Information UnrefriQerated Warehouse-No Rail Total 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land use Unrefrigerated-Warehouse-No 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy -atego!y Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0396 1.6700e-0.0413 0.0000 i 153.4002 i 163.4O62T a .asooe-I 0.0000 163.6211 003 I i 003 i ~ i 392,382 392,382 392,382 392,382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 69.4275 J 69.4275 1 2.8000e-1 5.3000e-, 69.6568 l i 003 i 004 Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGas 6.9000e-6.2700e-5.2700e-4.0000e- Mitigated 004 003 003 005 NaturalGas 6.9000e-6.2700e-5.2700e-4.0000e- Unm~igated 004 003 003 005 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Unmitigated Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Total Mitigated Lancl Use Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Total 128000 6.9000e-6.2700e-5.2700e-4.0000e- 004 003 003 005 6.9000e-, 6.2700e-, 5.2700e-, 4.0000e- 004 003 003 005 NaturalGa I ROG sUae NOX co 502 KtlfU/yr 128000 Ii 6.9000e-T 6.2700e-5.2700e-4.0000e-jj 004 I 003 003 005 6.9000e-, 6.2700e-, 5.2700e-I 4.0000e- 004 003 003 005 5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 69.4275 69.4275 2.8000e-5.3000e-69.6568 003 004 4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-0.0000 6.8306 6.8306 1.3000e-1.3000e-6.8712 004 004 004 004 004 004 4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-4.8000e-0.0000 6.8306 6.8306 1.3000e-1.3000e-6.8712 004 004 004 004 004 004 '2e 4.8000e-4.8000e- 004 004 j 4.8000e-j 4.8000e- . 004 I 004 0.0000 6.8306 6.8306 ! 1.3000e-1.3000e-6.8712 i 004 004 4.8000e-J 4.8000e- 004 004 4.8000e-, 4.8000e-J 0.0000 004 004 6.8306 6.8306 I 1.3000e-, 1.3000e-T 6.8712 004 004 FugltiVe I Exllausr) -PM10 j Fugitive j ElChaust j PM2.5 1Bio-CO2 jNBio-CO2,TotalCO2j CH4 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total N2U C02e lonll/YI 4.8000e-4.8000e- 004 004 4.8000e-, ,U000e- 004 004 4.8000e-j 4.8000e- 004 I 004 0.0000 4.8000e-, 4.8000e-I 0.0000 004 004 Ml/yr 6.8306 6.8306 ui!°e-T uic°:e-i 6.8712 i i 6.8306 6.8306 I 1.3000e-, 1.3000e-I 6.8712 004 004 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Total Mitigated Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Total 294400 294400 6.0 Area Detail i2e 69.4275 2.8000e-5.3000e-1 69.6568 003 004 69.4275 2.8000e-5.3000e-69.6568 003 004 69.4275 2.8000e-5.3000e-69.6568 003 004 69.4275 J 2.soooe:-r-s:Jolllle-I 69.6568 003 004 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area I ,tegory I Mitigated 0.3542 1.0000e- 005 Unmitigated 0.3542 1.0000e- 005 6.2 Area by Subcategory Unmitigated su _______ , Architectural Coating Consumer Products Landscaping Total Mitigated Architectural Coating Consumer Products l<U\> NUX 0.0417 0.3124 7.0000e-1.0000e- 005 005 0.3542 1.0000e- 005 0.0417 0.3124 7.4000e-0.0000 0.0000 004 7.4000e-0.0000 0.0000 004 \,U ~u.: Fugitive CJ1111111St PM10 PM10 llDrlll'Yf 0.0000 0.0000 7.4000e-0.0000 0.0000 004 7.4000e-0.0000 0.0000 004 0.0000 0.0000 :e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4-300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 ,-M10 FuglDVII t:.X1111USl ... M.:.5 Bi0-1.,u.: rtllO-1.,u;,:I Total 1.,u2 1.,M4 NiO:U 1.,U".le Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Tolal M yr 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 :e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping !l 7.ooooe=-l 1.ooooe-l 7.4oooe-i 0.0000 ll 005 i 005 l 004 i H I i Total 0.3642 I 1.0000e-17 .4000e-I 0.0000 005 004 7 .0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy I 0//'y Mitigated 50.1418 0.4841 Unmitigated 62.6773 0.6051 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated lndoor/Outl Total CO2 door Use 0.0117 0.0147 CH4 65.7417 82.1772 I N20 t:nao .. I Dilal I MT/Yf Unrefrigerated 18.5 , o II 62.6773 0.6051 ~ 0.0147 Warehouse-No Iii ·1 H Total I 62.6773 0.6051 I 0.0147 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 I 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4300e-1.4300e-0.0000 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 003 003 I C02e 82.1772 I s2.1772 Mitigated lotal1.,u;;: 1.,t14 N.i?U door Use Land Use Mgal IV f'/f Unrefrigerated I 14.8/0 II 50.1418 0.4841 j 0.0117 Ware~ouse-No I H I Total 60.1418 0.4841 0.0117 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Cate.9.Q!YN ear 101111c;o21 CH4 N2U c;o2e MTl'/f Mitigated 11 15.2649 §~ 0.9021 0.0000 I 37.8182 1.,u2e I 65.7417 66.7417 Unmitigated 15.2649 I 0.9021 I I I 0.0000 I 37.8182 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated • ., Waste I fotal CO2 CH4 j N20 j C02e I OiapoNd -Land Use I tons I MT/YI' Unrefrigerated / 75.2 11 15.2649 0.9021 , 0.0000 , 37.8182 Warehouse-No i ii 2 ·; ! H Total I I 15.2649 0.9021 I 0.0000 I 37.8182 Mitigated Waste I Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I co2e Disposed -LandUM tons I MT/YI' Unrefrigerated 75.2 ll 15.2649 0.9021 l 0.0000 37.8182 Warehouse-No 2 ·; I 15.2649 o.9021 I 0.0000 I 37.8182 Total 9.0 Operational Offroad i Eql.ipment Type i Nwnber i Hcxn/Day i 15aystYear i ~orse ~ower i Load ~actor i ~uet Type i 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators ,mentType I Number I HOtn/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type ti Boilers :quipment Type uelType User Defined Equipment :quipment Type 11.0 Vegetation