HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 12; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 12; Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP)LFMP 87-12
ZONE 12
Description: E/ECR, N/OLIVENHAIN, W/RSF, S/LEVANTE
APN No.: NONE
Status: Approved
Application date: June 30, 1987
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -PART II
(To Be Completed by the Planning Department)
CASE NO. LFMP 87-12
DATE: 12/03/87
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: THE WILLIAM HOFMAN COMPANY
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 6999 El Camino Real ----------------
SUITE 208 G
CARLSBAD CA 92009
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: ----------------------
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be Written Under
Section III -Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
1. Earth -Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
2. Air -Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water -Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
-2-
-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4. Plant Life -Will the proposal have
significant results in:
5.
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
Animal Life -Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise -Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels?
7. Light and Glare -Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare?
8. Land Use -Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area?
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9. Natural Resources -Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset -Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
11. Population -Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area?
12. Housing -Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation -Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilit-
ies, or demand for new parking?
c. Impact upon existing transporation
systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
-4-
-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
14. Public Services -Will the proposal have
15.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
a.
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
Other governmental services?
Energy -Will the proposal have signif-
icant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities -Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health -Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
18. Aesthetics -Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation -Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
20. Archeological/Historical -Will the
proposal have significant results in
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building?
-
YES MAYBE
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
NO
X
X
X
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate
sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
A) Phased planning for public facilities will not efficiently
address public facility adequately
B) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
C) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
D) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on the General
Plan.
E) The plan considers phased development.
F) The project is a public facility information and planning study.
G) Would not assure adequate public facilities to meet demand.
-6-
-
22. Mandatory Findings of Significance -
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 is a facilities planning
document. The intent of the plan is to establish parameters that assure
adequate and acceptable public facilities are available when needed. To
accomplish this occasionally locations and costs of public facility
improvements are estimated for informational purposes. It is recognized
that CEQA Review for these public facilities estimates is general, and does
not satisfy CEQA requirements for the project's themselves. The Zone 12
Local Facilities Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior to
initialization of any public or private project discussed in the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12.
-7-
-
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed by the Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant ---effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the ---environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
12. -s -87
Date
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-8-
--
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-9-