HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-04; Planning Commission; ; CT 93-08|PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"c
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 15. 1994 - 90 Day Extension
PROJECT PLANNER:TERESA WOODS
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
I.RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675, and
3676, recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-08 and PUD 93-07, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II.ITEM EXPLANATION
This matter was considered by the Planning Commission at its meeting November 16,1994,
and continued to November 30,1994 to allow the applicant time to respond to certain issues
raised by the Commission. It was subsequently continued to January 4, 1995.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo dated January 4, 1995 with proposed revisions to Resolutions
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676
4. Exhibit "I" as referred to in Condition 46 of Resolution No. 3675
5. Staff Report dated November 30, 1994
6. Staff Report dated November 16, 1994, with attachments.
""*"%
JANUARY 4, 1995
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF
RESOLUTION NOS. 3675 AND 3676, CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO
CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
At the November 16, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, the following issues were raised
by the members of the Planning Commission regarding CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - Rancho
Carrillo Village "O":
1. Lack of single story units.
2. The requested affordable housing standards modification to reduce the minimum front
yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet.
3. Potential 50% lot coverage.
4. Minimum 10 foot building separation between more than 10 two-story units in a row.
In response to these comments, the applicant has agreed to provide the following: a minimum
of 15% of the units as single story; a minimum 20' front yard setbacks; and, to comply with
the building separation requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance (Section
21.45.090(5) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code). The Village "O" Design Guidelines (attached)
have been revised to reflect these standards.
The following findings and conditions must be amended based on the revised design.
RESOLUTION NO. 3675
Finding;
43r Delete Finding # 13 as no standards modifications are requested for Village "O". That
the incentives included as part of this project (reduced front yards and reduced
building separation) will not be detrimental to public health and safety; will not
result in an overall pattern of development that is incompatible with land uses in
the immediate vicinity; will help ochicvc the City's housing goal for lower income
housing; and, the incentives ore necessary to make the project economically
feasible.
5. Based on the "Initial Study" prepared for this project the Planning Commission
determines that the project is within the scope of EIR 91-04 on file in the
Planning Department, and there are no additional significant adverse
environmental impacts associated with the project, therefore, no further
environmental review of this project is required. All feasible mitigation measures
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
JANUARY 4, 1995
PAGE 2 _
identified in EIR 91-04 will be undertaken in this project as designed and
conditioned have been incorporated into or imposed m conditions on the project.
Planning Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for CT 93-08, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "J", dated September
7, 1994, £«xce$t te wi&itt 60 %ys of filial ajpdval of tb& project* ixhMt
Arehiteetts^l Data Sheet, shall fee ievised to inflect all applicable reipireineitts
approved Village '"O* Destpi guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions, and approved by the Planning Director or City
Engineer.
,9. ... Further, prior io the recordation of the final map or the Issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within Lots
140 of this tentative map, shall prepare and record a notice in & manner meeting
the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney that this property &
subject to noise, lighting «nd glare, and general activity impacts from the nearby
CarriOo Ranch Community Park
11. The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilities
remain available to the park site at all times during development unless prior
approval is secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be provided
during all phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Parks and
Recreation Director.
28. Elevations and floor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the Delayed
Architectural Review standards established in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan,
and shall comply with the Village "O" Design Guidelines as shown on Exhibit "P".
After reviewing these plans and determining that they are in conformance with
the approved design guidelines, staff will present the floor plans and architecture
to the Planning Commission per the process described in Title 21.45.160. Mor to
or concurrent with the delayed architectural review process, the appHcant shall decide
whether Lo& 6 m& 49
2145.090(5) of tfee CarMa^ MMicipal Code), If it & defenKked &»l l*ote 6 and 4$
will not be devefoped, prior to final map, an qpeit space easement shall lie i^orded o
toe MSx If these lots, m telaibied as opett space* the Lots shall be lapsed with
other amenitie.?
46. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures identified
within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit "I")
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
JANUARY 4, 1995
PAGE 3
which are required...
52. Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to riparian habitat and
threatened/endangered plant species will be mitigated under the review and
supervision of the California Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers and any other applicable resource agency. The mitigation plan must
be approved by the involved resource agencies prior to the recordation of final
map or issuance of grading permit. Grading plans shall reflect the resource
agencies review and approval. If modifications are required by the agencies are
not determined to be in substantial conformoncc with approved plans, the
applicant may b* required to apply for an amendment to this Tentative Map
and/or Planned Development Permit or apply for new discretionary permits.
65. Delete as redundant with Condition #63.
87. In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR), grading of natural habitat shaH |||fif$ not occur during the nesting
season of any endangered avian species. All grading within 500' of coastal
California gnatcatcher occupied habitat and within 200' or riparian habitat,
occupied by least Bell's vireo and willow flycatcher, shall be restricted to the
period between September 1 and February 15 of any given year.
Engineering Conditions:
92. Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements as required in the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan
(LFMP) for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
These improvements, unless otherwise modified fry the final decision making
ffflll shall be substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
RESOLUTION NO. 3676
Finding:
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, the General Plan,
and all applicable adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies as
demonstrated by the project's consistency with all provisions of these documents
except as may be modified for affordable housing incentives.
4. The proposed planned development will meet all of the minimum development
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
JANUARY 4, 1995
PAGE 4
standards and design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.090 and 21.45.080 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (except as modified for affordable housing incentives) and
will be designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design Guidelines
Manual as demonstrated by features such as 51-60 foot wide public streets,
adequate guest and recreational vehicle parking, and a spacious and accessible
common recreation area.
Planning Conditions:
2. Approval is granted for PUD 93-07, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "J", dated
September 7,1994, (except that within 60 <lays of final approval of this project,
ExMbit "E", Architectural Data S&set* shall be revised to reflect all applicable
&<{djm6ftt& of &e appidved Village *€T Design pld«l&*e&} incorporated by reference
and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as
shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
4Qr Delete condition # 10 as no standards modifications are requested hi Village "O".
Front yard setbacks will be varied pursuant to the Architectural Data sheet,
Exhibit "E".
TW:vd
,
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE
March 15. 1994 - 90-dav extension
Staff Planner: Teresa Woods
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1994
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
I.RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission CONTINUE this item to January 4, 1995.
II.PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Staff is recommending continuance of this item to allow the applicant and staff adequate
time to respond to the issues raised on a companion project by the Planning Commission
at the meeting of November 16, 1994.
APPLICATIOXCOMPLETE DATE:
MARCH 15. 1994 - 90 Day Extension
PROJECT PLANNER:TERESA WOODS
STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1994
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O" - Request for
approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit to
include 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet), and 1
open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane
(previously Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension, in the
PC zone, in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18.
I.RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3675, and
3676, recommending APPROVAL of CT 93-08 and PUD 93-07, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions contained therein.
II.PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Map and Planned Development Permit
to create 51 single family residential lots (minimum 5,000 square feet) and 1 open space lot
on a 19.3 acre site located south of Poinsettia Lane (Carrillo Way) extension and west of
Melrose Drive extension. The parcel is undeveloped and contains native and disturbed
habitat. It is located in the Planned Community Zone (PC), and is subject to the
requirements of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan as well as Final Environmental Impact
Report 91-04 and Hillside Development Permit 91-17 which were processed concurrently
with the Master Plan. Village "O" is also subject to the requirements of Residential Low
Medium (RLM) and Open Space (OS) General Plan designations.
The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan was approved by City Council on July 27, 1993. The
purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the orderly development of the entire Rancho
Carrillo site, while preserving the environmental resources of the area. For planning
purposes, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan is divided into Villages "A" - "T". The Master
Plan identifies the allowable type and intensity of land use in each village and provides
detailed development and design standards, requirements, and the method by which the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan will be implemented.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 2
The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan permits Tentative Tract Maps with Planned Unit
Developments to be processed without floor plans and elevations. Instead design guidelines
are required to be adopted as part of the discretionary action through a process called
Delayed Architectural Review (DAR). The DAR process was intended to focus Planning
Commission review specifically on project architecture without opening the tentative map
up for re-evaluation and additional conditions. The design guidelines developed as part of
the DAR process may address such areas as building envelopes, setbacks from slopes,
building separation, and compliance with small lot architectural guidelines. Floor plans and
elevations must be submitted to staff for review prior to building permit. After reviewing
the plans and determining their compliance with the approved design guidelines, the floor
plans and architectural elevations must be presented to the Planning Commission pursuant
to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.45.160. Section 21.45.160 provides that should the
Planning Commission consider the amendment (approval of design guidelines) minor in
nature, it may be approved without the necessity for a public hearing. If the Planning
Commission determines that the amendment is major, a public hearing is required.
As shown on Exhibits "A" - "P", the proposed project contains individual single family lots
ranging in size from 5,690 to 13,500 square feet. Village "O" is designed as a two story
neighborhood (although a one story component may be provided) intended to be marketed
to first-time home buyers and first-time move-up buyers. Pursuant to the Delayed
Architectural Review procedures, the applicant has not submitted floor plans or elevations
for units. However, detailed design guidelines have been prepared for this Village to ensure
that architectural concerns are addressed. There is a central active and passive recreation
facility containing turf, benches and a combination of play equipment, as provided for in the
Village "O" Design Guidelines to serve the entire project. The recreation area is located
on the eastern portion of the site, between Melrose Drive and Street O-B and will be
approximately .28 acres in size.
Final EIR 91-04 addressed the environmental impacts associated with implementation of the
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. EIR 91-04 concluded that significant but mitigable impacts
would occur due to project implementation. This project, as designed and conditioned, is
consistent with and implements the mitigation requirements of EIR 91-04. Grading for this
project was approved under HDP 91-17. As proposed, this project is consistent with HDP
91-17. No additional grading is proposed as part of this project.
Pursuant to the requirements of the City's adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15%
of the base dwelling units (60.0 x .15 = 9.0 affordable units) must be provided for lower
income households. The applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units
off-site in a combined affordable project in Village "F". A combined affordable project is
a separate residential development site which, under contract, must provide at an alternative
site or sites, some or all of the required inclusionary units associated with the development.
The Site Development Plan for Village "F" (SDP 94-01) will be reviewed and acted upon
prior to review of this project. This will ensure that all affordable housing requirements are
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 3
satisfied and all incentives agreed to prior to review and approval of this project. This
project would be conditioned to comply with the Affordable Housing Agreement
requirement of the Village "F" Site Development Plan (SDP 94-01). As part of the
affordable housing incentives package submitted as part of SDP 94-01, the applicant has
requested reduced development standards for Village "O". In particular, the applicant has
requested to reduce the front yard setback from 20 to 15 feet and has requested that the
building separation for more than 10 two-story units in a row be reduced from 20 to 10 feet.
As discussed in Section F, Inclusionary Housing, both requests are supported by the Housing
Committee. The reduced standards requested must be approved as part of the affordable
housing incentives package of the Village "F" Site Development Plan and are further
discussed in Section E, page 11.
III. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, and standards:
A. RLM General Plan Land Use Designation.
B. Rancho Carrillo Master Plan MP 139(E).
C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.45, "Planned Development".
D. City Council Policy 44 for Small Lot Single Family Homes.
E. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.85, "Inclusionary Housing".
F. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20, "Subdivision Ordinance"; and the
California Subdivision Map Act.
G. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21, Chapter 21.90, "Growth Management
Ordinance" (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 18).
H. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19, "Environmental Protection Procedures";
and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A. GENERAL PLAN
Planning Issue
Is the Tentative Tract Map consistent with the General Plan?
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 4
DISCUSSION
The Tentative Tract map is consistent with the City's General Plan including the Land Use,
Housing and Open Space and Conservation Elements as noted below.
LAND USE ELEMENT
The property is designated as RLM (Residential Low-Medium) and OS (Open Space) in
the General Plan. The RLM Land Use Designation allows the development of single-family
homes within a density range from 0 to 4 dus/acre with a 3.2 dus/acre growth control point.
The proposed project would contain 51 units at a density of 3.9 dus/acre. Although Growth
Management would normally permit only 41 units on this site, pursuant to the Rancho
Carrillo Master Plan, Chapter 2, Section E.I, Village "O" may be developed with up to 51
dwelling units at a density of 3.9 dus/acre. This is within the density range of the RLM
General Plan designation. The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan notes that the greater density
is acceptable because the maximum number of units allowed by the Master Plan, 1,816, is
below the 2,091 residential units allocated to Zone 18 by its approved Local Facilities
Management Plan. These densities were approved as part of the Rancho Carrillo Master
Plan MP 139(E). This project is therefore consistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan.
HOUSING ELEMENT
The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan requires that affordable housing be provided within the
Master Plan area. Villages "C", "E" and "F" are designated as potential affordable sites
which may be utilized by other Villages in meeting their affordable housing requirements.
To fulfill this requirement, the applicant is proposing to provide 15 percent of the total 60.0
inclusionary base units (9.0 affordable units) in a combined affordable housing project in
Village "F". Village "F", which is being processed concurrently with this project as Site
Development Plan SDP 94-01, will be reviewed and acted upon prior to review and action
on Village "O". The provision of affordable units is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the
Housing Element which states that, "A minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of all units
approved for any master plan community or residential specific plan shall be affordable to
lower income-households". The 9.0 affordable units required for Village "O" are shown on
the Village "F", Conceptual Site Development Plan (Exhibit "N"). See Section E,
Inclusionary Housing below, for a more detailed discussion of the affordable housing
proposed by this project.
OPEN SPACE
The Open Space and Conservation Element requires that open space be provided for in the
area near Village "O" for habitat/wildlife corridor/active recreational purposes. As proposed,
Village "O" will provide for a greenway corridor along the southern portion of the project,
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 ^
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGES
Lot 52 (see Exhibit "M", Master Plan Open Space). The Element further encourages private
community trails to connect neighborhoods with the Citywide Trail System. As proposed,
Village "O" will provide approximately 5.7 acres of open space on Lot 52. The southern
portion of this lot is required to be set aside as natural open space with the remainder
containing active and passive recreational amenities. These active/passive recreational
amenities will include a tot lot as well as a community trail which will connect to Trail
Segment 34 of the Citywide Trail System. Village "O" will set aside the southeast portion
of the site as open space as required pursuant to the Master Plan and as mapped on the
General Plan Land Use Map. The project is therefore, consistent with the Open Space and
Conservation Element of the General Plan and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan as it
pertains to open space. Timing of installation and the responsibility for maintenance of
open space areas and trails are summarized in the Village "O" Open Space Compliance
Table on page 6.
B. RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER PLAN
Planning Issue
Does the proposed development comply with the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
requirements?
DISCUSSION
The proposed development complies with all of the requirements of the Rancho Carrillo
Master Plan for Village "O" including product type and density; the approved Hillside
Development Permit; design criteria; setbacks from Melrose Drive; Special Park Design
criteria; open space and trail requirements; and Master Plan infrastructure requirements as
follows:
a. As allowed in the Master Plan, the proposed development is for single family,
detached units with a density of 3.9 dus/acre. Although this density exceeds the
growth control point of 3.2 dus/acre, this is allowed in the Master Plan. The small
lot single family residential development would be compatible with the surrounding
neighborhoods which are planned for both single family and multiple family
residential development. The smaller lots, intended for first time home buyers and
first time move-up buyers will provide a diversity of housing opportunities within the
Master Plan area.
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved Hillside Development
permit (HDP 91-17) approved concurrent with the Master Plan in that lot elevations
are consistent with the approved grading elevations. No additional grading is
proposed as part of this project.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 6
c. Village "O" complies with the general design criteria for development within the
Master Plan area as follows:
i. Where possible, units of Village "O" have been oriented to take advantage of
views of Carrillo Ranch Community Park and the designated open space area
located on the southern portion of the village;
ii. Units have been located a minimum of 50-feet from Melrose Drive;
iii. A 6' high noise wall will be placed along the northeasterly portion of the site,
adjacent to Melrose Drive, to ensure that noise is attenuated to 60 dBA
CNEL exterior pursuant to City policy. In addition, all units will be mitigated,
as necessary, to 45 dBA CNEL interior pursuant to City noise policy; and
iv. Lots 1 -14 of Village "O" are located within the Special Park Design District
identified in the Master Plan. The Master Plan established the Special Park
Design District to protect the historic context and feeling of the Carrillo
Ranch Community Park site. Developments located within this special district
are not to clash with the existing architecture and landscape of the Carrillo
Ranch Community Park. To ensure compatibility of future development of
Village "O" with the park site, special design criteria have been included in
the Village "O" Design Guidelines (see page 7 of Exhibit "P"). The guidelines
require proper design, screening and landscaping to ensure continued
compatibility with the Carrillo Ranch Community Park.
d. Consistent with the Master Plan, Lot 52 of Village "O" is a 5.7 acre open space lot
which has been set-aside for habitat/wildlife corridor/active recreational purposes.
Approximately .28 acres of this lot will be developed as a recreational area tot lot.
A community trail, running north/south within Lot 52 will connect to the Citywide
Trail system just west of Melrose Drive on the north side of Carrillo Way. The
southern portion of Lot 52 will remain in natural open space. The natural open
space of Lot 52 will connect to a larger east/west open space corridor required
pursuant to the Master Plan (see Exhibit "M", Master Plan Open Space). The table
below depicts when, how, and what type of open space will be provided for in Village
"O":
VILLAGE "O"
OPEN SPACE COMPLIANCE
NATURAL OS
MPOS
For of Lot 52
cros
For of Lot 52
WHENOSHtOVmEfc
Prior to occupancy of 1st unit
OS
MAINTENANCE
BESPONSIBIttrV
Village HOA
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE?
CITYWIDE
TRAILS
MASTER PLAN
TRAILS
REC. AREA
SLOPES
N/A
N/A
N/A
Slopes in Lot 52
N/A
Trail links to
City's system
.28 AC tot lot
Slopes in Lot
52 plus Lots 1-
14
N/A
Prior to occupancy of first unit
Prior to occupancy of first unit
All landscaping complete prior
to occupancy of first unit.
N/A
Village HOA
Village HOA
Village HOA
e. The proposed Village "O" Design Guidelines ensure that the development will be attractive,
sensitive to views from the Carrillo Ranch Park site, and contain a variety of materials,
architectural accent features, articulated wall and roof planes, roof heights, building mass,
and building street setbacks. The project is conditioned to provide an architectural theme
consistent with the Master Plan requirements and the Village "O" Design Guidelines to
ensure that whichever style or combination of styles is used in the Village, is compatible with
the surrounding villages and the structures within the Carrillo Ranch Park. The surrounding
area is undeveloped and is planned for multifamily and standard single family residential
development. The future Carrillo Ranch Park site would be located northwest of the project
site.
f. There are several infrastructure improvements required pursuant to the Rancho Carrillo
Master Plan. To gain access to the site, major roadway infrastructure improvements are
necessary to serve Village "O". This will include the construction of Melrose Drive and
Poinsettia Lane to a minimum number of lanes necessary to serve this project. An
assessment district is currently in the formation process by Rancho Carrillo property owners
for Melrose Drive. This project is conditioned to ensure adequate access is provided to the
site and to ensure an emergency/secondary access is available prior to occupancy of any unit
within Village "O".
Further, sewer facilities are not currently accessible to the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
area. Therefore, major off-site sewer line construction is required. As conditioned
occupancy of units cannot occur until sewer service is made available to the project.
C. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE/CHAPTER 21.45
Planning Issue
Does the proposed Planned Development Permit comply with all the requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance?
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGES
DISCUSSION
The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan designates Carlsbad Municipal Code, Titles 20 and 21 as the
implementing ordinances for the Master Plan. The Master Plan further requires any Village with
a Tentative Tract Map creating lots averaging less than 7,500 square feet in size to process a
Planned Development Permit pursuant to Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Village
"O" proposes minimum 5,000 square foot lots, and, therefore, a Planned Development Permit is
being processed. The project, as designed and conditioned, is consistent with the Planned
Development Ordinance, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and all other applicable ordinances.
The findings required to approve a project under the Planned Development Ordinance can be
made as summarized below.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Village "O" is designed for single family residential development on smaller lots (minimum 5,000
square feet). The development of Village "O" with this type of residential product would provide
a balance and mix of residential land uses within this portion of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
As conditioned, the proposed project complies with the minimum development standards set forth
in the Design Guidelines Manual and the Planned Development ordinance, except as modified for
affordable housing incentives as discussed below in Item E, Inclusionary Housing. The Tentative
Tract Map is consistent with the approved Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17) approved
as part of the Master Plan. As approved under HDP 91-17, the manufactured slopes would be
contour-graded and landscaped. The streets are curvilinear and follow the natural slope. The
following table is a summary of how the project complies with the development standards of the
Planned Development Ordinance. A more detailed discussion of important issues follows this table.
VILLAGE "O"
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
LOT SIZE (MIN.)
FRONT YARD
SETBACK
SIDE YARD SETBACK
BUILDING
SEPARATION
BUILDING HEIGHT
PUBLIC STREET
WIDTH
PARKING - RESIDENT:
GUEST:
RV STORAGE
REQUIRED
3,500 sq. ft.
20ft.
10% of lot width (5 ft. min.)
20 ft. (between 10 or more 2
story units
30ft.
60 ft. (reductions for single
loaded streets & cul-de-sacs
may be permitted)
102 covered spaces
16 spaces
20 sq. ft. per unit (1,020 sq. ft.
required)
PROPOSED
5,690 - 13,500 sq. ft.
15 - 25 ft.*
10% of lot width (5 ft. min.)
10 ft. minimum*
30 ft. maximum
51 to 60 ft.
102 covered spaces
158 on-street spaces (approx.)
Min. 1,020 sq. ft. in the RV storage lot in Village "Q"
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 9
STORAGE SPACE
RECREATION SPACE
COMMON ACTIVE:
PRIVATE PASSIVE:
REQUIRED
480 cu. ft. per unit
5,100 sq. ft.
5,100 sq. ft.
PROPOSED
To be provided in 2-car garage, ensured
delayed architectural review
during
12,000 sq. ft.
51,000 sq. ft. (private rear yds approx. 20"x 50' ea.)
Reduced standards are proposed as part ot the affordable bousing incentive package.
i. Setbacks
The project is proposing a reduction in front yard setbacks from 20 feet to 15 feet.
The applicant has requested this reduction in standards as part of the affordable
housing incentive package (See Item E, below for a more detailed discussion of
affordable housing issues). The 15-foot front yard plus 5 foot utility easement would
still provide 20-feet inside of the sidewalk for parking in the driveway so vehicles will
not hang over onto the street. Although the ordinance requires a 20 foot minimum
front yard along public streets, the ordinance does permits 15 foot front yards on
private streets. This reduction in standards would not adversely impact the public,
health and safety and would not adversely impact the overall design of the project.
The reduced setbacks would not reduce potential natural heating or cooling
opportunities. By permitting the variation in front yards, the project will have the
opportunity to create larger rear yards which may be desirable for many young
families. See Item E, below, for a more thorough discussion of affordable housing
incentives and rationales.
All of the homes adjacent to Melrose Drive (Prime Arterial) are set back from the
roadway a minimum of 50 feet as required pursuant to the Master Plan.
ii. Building Separation
When there are more than 10 two-story units in a row, a minimum 20 foot building
separation is required between all units. The applicant has requested a reduction of
this standard under their affordable housing incentives. If approved, the minimum
building separation will be 10 feet. See Item E, below, for a more thorough
discussion of affordable housing incentives and rationales.
iii. RV Storage
A minimum of 1,020 square feet of recreational vehicle (RV) storage space is
required for this project. The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan designated Lot 104
adjacent to Village "Q" as the RV storage facility for the Master Plan. Lot 104 is
approximately 3.5 acres in size and is proposed to be improved with approximately
142 RV parking spaces (see Exhibit "L", Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility). This
project would be conditioned to process a RV storage agreement to ensure phasing
of construction of the facility occurs concurrent with need. As conditioned, prior to
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 ^
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 10
occupancy of any unit within Village "O", adequate RV storage space must be
provided.
FACILITIES AND SERVICES
All required facilities and services will be available concurrent with need and will meet all
City standards. The Tentative Tract Map for Village "O" is designed with a 50 foot setback
from Melrose Drive and a portion of the site has been preserved as permanent open space.
Drainage facilities would be provided concurrent with development of Village "O" to reduce
erosion and flooding. All manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and
to visually screen the slopes and the associated development. The local streets within the
subdivision would be curvilinear and follow the natural contour. Streets O-A and a portion
of O-C would have a 60 foot wide right-of-way with curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides
of the streets, and streets O-B and O-C would have a 51 foot right-of-way and would be
single loaded with sidewalks on the developed side of the street only. Streets would connect
to Melrose Drive (via Carrillo Way) which is designated as a 126 foot wide prime arterial
in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
DELAYED ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
The proposed tentative tract map meets all City standards, except as may be modified for
affordable housing incentives. As allowed in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, the applicant
has elected to process the floor plans and elevations for Village "O" through a "Delayed
Architectural Review" (DAR) process as discussed above on page 2. To ensure that a
quality development is submitted during the DAR process, detailed design guidelines have
been prepared for Village "O". The following table depicts the primary issues covered in
the Village "O" Design Guidelines.
VILLAGE "O"
DESIGN GUIDELINES ISSUES
ISSUE
Unit Mix
Plotting of Units
Setbacks
Maximum Unit Size
COMMENT
A minimum of 3 floor plans with a minimum of 3
per floor plan shall be provided.
front building treatments
No floor plan shall be plotted more than 60% of total units on a street; no
2 units with same facades closer than 100 feet on the same side of the street;
and units may not utilize entire building envelope.
Melrose - 50' minimum
Front - 15' minimum with 15-25' range
Rear - 15' minimum with 20' average
Side - 5' minimum (10' min. corner lots)
1-story 2,300 sq. ft.; 2-story 3,500 sq. ft.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 11
ISSUE
Architecture
Garages
Accessory Structures
Walls and Fences
Signage
Planned Development
Ordinance
Common Recreation
Area
Park Design District
Sensitive Lots
Second Dwelling Units
Minor Modifications
COMMENT
Architectural style per Master Plan; compliance with small lot guidelines; 2
chimneys max.; min. 3 color schemes; and, use of a variety of front elevation
building materials.
At minimum, 85% of required garages shall be 2-car garages, min. 20' by 20';
and, garage doors set into walls.
Permitted as allowed by Section 21.10.050(1)(D).
Per Village "O" Landscape Concept Details, Exhibit "J".
Per Chapter 21.41 of CMC and as provided for in Master Plan.
Required compliance with Planned Development Ordinance, except as may
be modified for affordable housing incentives.
.28 acre site shall have turf, benches, one combination play equipment system
and two or three stand-alone play equipment per list.
Requires screening, landscaping and architecture compatible with Carrillo
Ranch Community Park.
Allows up to 10% of lots to be developed with second dwelling units per
Section 21.10.015 of the CMC unless a higher percentage is approved under
a density bonus. Second dwelling units shall require an amendment to the
PUD pursuant to Section 21.45.160 of the CMC.
Allows up to 5 cumulative changes to guidelines as a minor amendment
subject to Planning Director approval. (Second dwelling units shall require an
amendment to the PUD.)
D. CITY COUNCIL POLICY FOR SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
This City Council policy provides guidelines to encourage the quality development of small-
lot (less than 7,500 square feet) single-family projects. The intent of the guidelines is to
ensure that the homes have building articulation on all four sides and not appear as "row"
housing. They are primarily designed to apply to projects where there is a predominance
of two-story units. The Small Lot Guidelines have been incorporated into the Village "O"
Design Guidelines (see Exhibit "P"). This project will be required to comply with the
guidelines during the delayed architectural review process as discussed in Item C (g)(i)
above.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 12
E. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 21. CHAPTER 21.85 "INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING"
As discussed on page 4, the applicant is required to provide 9.0 affordable housing units
which will be constructed as part of a combined affordable development on Village "F". To
meet the affordable requirements, the applicant is requesting a reduction in development
standards. As proposed, Village "O" does not meet the Planned Development ordinance's
20 foot front yard setback requirement (15 foot front yards are proposed), nor the required
20 foot building separation for more than ten two-story units in a row requirement (10 feet
minimum proposed). The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend
to the City Council that these standards be waived as allowed by Section 21.53.120. The
applicant has submitted a request for on and off-site incentives to make the project
economically feasible under SDP 94-01. The applicant has explained that the reduced front
yard setback incentive would allow the creation of larger rear yards which will help in the
marketing of the units. The monetary benefit from permitting more than ten two-story units
in a row being less than 20 feet apart would be equal to the profit on two units. The
affordable housing incentives package included as part of SDP 94-01 has been reviewed and
approved by the Housing Committee and will be reviewed and acted upon by the Planning
Commission prior to the commission's review and action on this project.
F. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE/TITLE 20
Engineering Issue
Does CT 93-08 comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance?
DISCUSSION
As conditioned, the proposed Tentative Map would comply with all the requirements of the
City's Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. The project is conditioned to provide adequate
erosion control, and drainage. All required public street improvements including curb,
gutter, and sidewalk would be provided along all public streets. Streets have been designed
to City standards and will consist of a curb-to-curb paved width of either 40' or 36" with
curb, gutter, and a 5' wide utility easement on each side. Sidewalks will be provided on one
side only for single loaded streets, and provided on both sides for double loaded streets.
Primary access to the lots would be provided on Street O-A from Carrillo Way. A second
street intersection with Carrillo Way, at the south end of the site, will serve as an additional
access point to the project.
The Rancho Carrillo Master Plan identifies several planned streets to be included in the
adjacent Village "Q" that will also serve as access to Village "O". It is likely that the
planned street improvements for Village "Q" will be constructed prior to the development
of this project, however, as a "stand-alone" project, the tentative map requires the
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 13
o
identification of a second access point outside of the proposed access on Carrillo Way via
Melrose Drive. A condition will be placed on this project to identify and delineate a second
access point on the conformed tentative map exhibit.
Sewer service to Village "O" will be provided by a public sewer line that will tie into a 12"
sewer main to be installed for the entire Rancho Carrillo development. The sewer line will
drain by gravity flow in a westerly direction through the northern portion of Village "Q",
where it will join the 12" sewer main. This sewer main will connect with an offsite pump
station, which will pump sewage to the existing Buena/San Marcos Interceptor system (See
Exhibit "SS"). Water will be provided to Village "O" from a trunk line of the water main
on Melrose Drive. The trunk line will enter the development through an easement located
at the northern end of the project. A reclaimed water line will also be installed on Melrose
Drive, and will be tapped for irrigation of the slope areas in Village "O". Surface drainage
will be conveyed by standard curb and gutter that drains to an underground storm drain
system. The underground storm drain system will discharge into a check dam system to be
located on the west side of Carrillo Way in Village "Q". In turn, this check dam system will
connect to the major drainage outlet planned for the Rancho Carrillo development.
Grading for this project was approved under Hillside Development Permit (HDP 91-17)
which was approved for this site as part of the Master Plan. No additional grading is
proposed as part of this project. The approved grading plan consists of a comprehensive
7-phase grading operation. Phase I will complete a majority of the grading required within
the entire Master Plan area. The remaining approved phases of grading will be limited to
site specific grading of the villages. The geotechnical report for Village "O" stated that no
soil or geologic conditions observed or noted would preclude the development of this
project, provided the recommendations of the report are followed.
G. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 18 in the
southeast quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and
compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY
CITY ADMINISTRATION
LIBRARY
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
PARKS
DRAINAGE
CIRCULATION
FIRE
IMPACTS
177 sq. ft.
95 sq. ft.
51EDU
.35 acres
N/A
510 ADT
Station Nos. 2, 5, & 6
COMPLIANCE mrH
STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 14
OPEN SPACE
SCHOOLS
SEWER COLLECTION
SYSTEM
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Master Plan Compliance 5.7 acres
SMUSD
51EDU
11,220 GPD
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
H. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/TITLE 19 AND CEOA
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan MP
139(E) which covers a 417.9 gross acre site within Local Facilities Management Zone 18.
The direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts from the future development of
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan area have been discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 91-04) for the Master Plan approved by City Council on July 27,1993.
Staff prepared an initial study to analyze potential environmental impacts of the project and
conducted additional project level studies including soils contamination studies and a
drainage study. These studies provide more focused and detailed analysis. Staff determined
that no additional impacts over those addressed in EIR 91-04 will occur and therefore, the
project is in prior compliance with Final EIR 91-04. The recommended and applicable
mitigation measures of Final EIR 91-04 have been incorporated into the project design or
are included as conditions of approval for this project.
IV.SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project: (1) is consistent with the General Plan; (2) complies with the Rancho
Carrillo Master Plan; (3) complies with the subdivision ordinance; (4) complies with the
Planned Development Ordinance with the exception of front yard setbacks and building
separation requirements which have been reduced as an affordable housing incentive; (5)
is in conformance with Growth Management; and (6) will not significantly impact the
environment, therefore, staff recommends approval of CT 93-08/PUD 93-07.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE "O"
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
PAGE 15
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3675
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3676
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Form
6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
7. Reduced Exhibits (8 1/2" x 11")
8. Exhibit "K" Recreation Area Exhibit
9. Exhibit "L" Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility
10. Exhibit "M" Master Plan Open Space
11. Exhibit "N" Reduced (8 1/2" x 11") Village "F" Site Plan
12. Exhibit "O" Reduced Rancho Carrillo Master Plan Exhibit (8 1/2" x 11")
13. Exhibit "P" Village "O" Design Guidelines
14. Full size Exhibits "A" - "J", dated September 7, 1994.
TW:lh:vd
City of Cirisbad
CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGE "0"CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET/**^
CASE NO: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07UD<
CASE NAME: Carrillo Ranch Village "O"
APPLICANT: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned
Development Permit to include fifty-one single family residential lots (minimum 5.000 square feet")
and one open space lot on a 19.3 acre site generally located south of Poinsettia Lane (previously
Carrillo Way) extension, west of Melrose Drive extension
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Section 19 T12 R3W
APN: 222-010-02 (Portion) Acres: 19.3 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 52/51
(Assessor's Parcel Number)
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RLM/OS
Density Allowed 3.9 (Master Plan) Density Proposed 3.9
Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site PC Single Family Residential
North PC Park/School/Single FamilvResidential
South PC Multiple Family Residential
East PC Single Family Residential
West PC Single Family Residential
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District SMUSD Water District CMWD/LCWD Sewer District CMWD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 51
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated July 13. 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
X Other, Prior Compliance Final EIR 91-04
TW:vd
REV.7/91
SENT BY: CITY OF CiflRLSBflD
.^^^X"^ •--- -r—w i-»-tj,Of CSarlsbad
VILLAGE 0
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLCANTS STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON AUL AP PLICATIONS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION CN THg PART Of THE CfTV COUNCIL OR ANY APPCINTSD
BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE.
Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
i. Apallcsjnt
List the names and addresses of ai! ptrsons having a financial intartst in th« application,
Continental Homes
12636 High Bluff Drive
Suite 300
2.
LJSI tnt names and tddreaats of all parsons having any ownarahip inttrtst in th» propf rty involved.
Rancho Carrillo, Inc^ :.
c/o Continental Hcmes
J.2fi36_JIi<di Bluff
Suite 300
SanDiegp, CA - 92130
3. if any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, '.ist the
addresses of ai! individufJS owning more man 10% of the sharee in the corporation or owning any partn
interest in the partnership.
4. If any parson identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the narr
addresaat of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or &«r
of the trust
SENT BY:CITY OF CARLSMD, ; 5-25-93/**"^
W
6194380894-^619 438 2443;8 7
Oisciosurt Statement Page 2
5, Hava you had mar* tnan $250 wonh of auainaaa traniactad with any m*mb«r of City staff, Scar:
Commissions. Committees and Council witftin tftd past tweiva montha?
Vea No \ If yes, p!e«a» indicate porsond) t
Pertton is definad aa: 'Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint vantura, aaaociation, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, Mttata, trust, reearvtr, syndicate thia and any otnar county, ciry and Bounty. c,ty
municipally, district or otftsr pomtcai subdivision, or any otnar group or combination acting as a u • •
(MOTS: Attach additional pagas a» naca$«ary.)
Signatura ojf OWney/data Signaturt of appiicanVditt
Kanciio Carrillo, Inc.Continental Homes
Print or typa nam* of owner Print or typ« nam« of applicant
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: Carrillo Ranch Village "O" - CT 93-08/PUD 93-07
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 18 GENERAL PLAN : RLM
ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER'S NAME: L & W Investments Inc. - Continental Homes
ADDRESS: 12636 High Bluff Drive. Suite 300. San Diego. CA 92130
PHONE NO: (619) 793-2580 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 222-010-02
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC.. SO. FT.. DID: 19.3 acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A
(Portion)
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 177 sq. ft.
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 95 sq. ft.
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .35 acres
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin = N/A
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 510
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = Nos. 2.S&6
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - 5.7
I. Schools: N/A
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 51
Identify Sub Basin - N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD - 11.200
L. The project is 10 units above the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
TW:vd
HELRQSE AVENUE
,,- KIT MAP
rVyw0Mtettt*nMMMnMf*am If laM. Owttng M«*C** from m« tq»TWwtf Or W fltamng OHOar.
I5-OMPL MUMW/MTHM UMM>fMT)OT«i««IM
R A N C H O
I L L A C E O
VILLAGE O: 5,000 s.f. LOTS
ARCHITECTURAL DATA
LEGEND
^j§=S3T
.<*>*" I vmgiltmimVMjf? \ (Slimnniriica
VILLAGE O VIGNETTE
R A N C H O
'At I
EXHIBIT "M"
R A N C H O
VILLAGE 0 OPEN SPACE LOT
mx
I A N C H O
V^CONIIMMIM. HOM\J
Village FSite Development Pjan
"K"
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
Village "0"
Play Equipment Options
MODEL EQUIPTMENT AREA AGES #
Combination Play Equiptment Systems
600-548
600-0069
137-4
Don Mill's
137-7
Belmont
139-2
Madison
140-1
Lakefield
139-1
Oakville
Stand-Alone
Notes:
"S" Horizontal Ladder, 90° Crawl Tube, "S" Tube Slide, Spiral
Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide, Spiral Slide
Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam, 2"x6f
Wide Slide, 8' Single Slide
Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, Curved Tube Slide,
Horizontal Ladder, 3 Platforms
Open Super Slide, Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, 2
Platforms
1/2 Tube, 1/2 Open Curved Slide, Chain Net Climber,
Horizontal Ladder, Wooden Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber,
Balance Beam, 2 Platforms
Tube Slide, Open Slide, Tire Swing, Horizontal Ladder,
Access Ramp, 2 Platforms
1/2 Tube, 1/2 Open Slide, Chain Net Climber, Wooden
Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balance Beam, Horizontal
Ladder, 3 Platforms
Play Equiptment
Platform Seesaw
8* Slide
8'" Circular Slide
7' Climber
Spring Platform
Wood Swings
Tire Swing
Tot Sand Box
Wood Parallel Bars
Wood Horizontal Ladder
Spring Mates
Whirl
48' X 53'
" 33'X58'
33' x 36'
27'x'28'
45'x31'
53' X 40'
44' X 39'
19'x2r
12' x 4'
(structure)
6'dia
(structure)
17-dia
(structure)
20* x 20'
29'x24'
25' x 30*
12' x12'
18'x2f
20' x 26*
7'xr
6'dia
(structure)
4-12
3-8
2-10
2-6
3-10
3-10
2-10
3-8
-
-
-
3-12
4-12
4-12
2-6
-
-
3-6
-
36
-26
30
20
40
45
30
4
-
-
-
4
3
3
8
-
-
1
-
Play equiptment for tot lots shall consist of one (1) Combination Play Equiptment System
from the above list and two (2) or three (3) of the Stand-Alone Play Equiptment.
Model numbers refer to Playworid Systems and Children's Playground, Inc. models. Others
may be substituted if approved.
JN 12004G June 10, 1993
RECREATION AREA TABULATION
REQUIRED: 51 units x 200 s.f. per unit =
10,200 s.f. of private and common recreation
PROVIDED: 12,000 s.f. common (totlot)
51.OOP s.f. private (rearyards, approximately 20'x50'each)=
63,000 S.f. TOTAL RECREATION REQUIREMENTS
VILLAGE O - RANCHO CARRILLO
#7/33 JN12004D
EXHBIT "M*
PSttfiSI R A N C H O^ rARMiQ\>^i?it^SAJ|f VIUAGE. Q" OPEN SPACE^ LOT
EXHIBIT "O"
R A N C H O
EXHIBIT "P"
VILLAGE O
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village O consists of 51 residential and 1 open space lots in the southern portion of
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139E). The lots range in size from 5,690 to
13,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 7,859 square feet.
2. UNIT MIX & SIZE
The project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation
treatments per floor plan 3 4
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sq.ft.
Two Story Units - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq.ft.
3. PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
architectural data exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village O.
Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more
Village O Design Guidelines I December 22, 1994
than 60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front
facades shall be plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street. Units
may be plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with
the requirements of the Village O Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots
may not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the
ability to construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall
building coverage does not exceed 50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory
structures that are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the
Planned Development Permit for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these conditions shall be attached to the plot plan
for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase
and the overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3
(Plotting), 5 D, E, & G (Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these
guidelines. This matrix may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning
Director when the floor plans and elevations for this tentative map are approved.
4.SETBACKS
Melrose
Front
Rear
Side
All units shall maintain a 50' minimum setback from Melrose ROW
15' minimum to the livable portion or garages , this setback may be
reduced to 15' from the back of sidewalk to increase the rear yard
setback from environmentally sensitive areas and create a more
interesting streetscape as shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit. The
overall average setback of garages from the back of sidewalk in this
village shall be 25'.
In accordance with Section 21.45.080(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad
Zoning Ordinance, the front yard setback shall be 20 feet, however
the front yard setback may be varied to a 15 foot average with a 10
foot minimum to the livable portion of the unit or to garages turned
90 degrees from the street.
All units shall have a minimum 15' deep, flat usable rear yard. Usable
rear yards within Village O will have an average depth of 20'.
5' minimum
10' minimum for corner lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance). Building separation should range from 10' - 20' as
shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit.
Village O Design Guidelines December 22, 1994
Building Separation 10' minimum All units in Village O shall comply with the
building separation requirements of the Planned
Development Ordinance, Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
21.45.090(5). If the applicant decides to develop all of the
lots along Streets O-B & O-C with two story units, without a
20' building separation, then 10 or fewer units in a row shall
be constructed. In such a case Lots 6 & 49 shall be
restricted so as not to permit the construction of a dwelling
unit. The applicant shall decide whether Lots 6 & 49 will be
developable lots prior to approval of Final Map.
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of
the following styles that have been approved as a part of the Rancho Carrillo
Master Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village O, it shall be
compatible with the surrounding Villages and the structures within Carrillo
Ranch Park as determined by the Planning Director. Architectural styles are
described in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, General Community
Development Standards pages 31-35.
B. When three or more 2 story units are in a row situated less than 15 feet apart,
at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a
depth of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof
covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for
the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type
roofs falling to a single story element).
C. When three 2 story units in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least
one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of
not less than 5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story units shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit (this in not intended to preclude long shed type roofs
falling to a single story element).
Village O Design Guidelines 3 December 22, 1994
D. Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline, the single story
edge shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33 %
shall be distributed throughout the project.
E. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have at least four separate
building planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall
be 18 inched and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows
and roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane
and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet/ A plane must be a
minimum of 30 square feet to receive credit under this section.
F. Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph E for
front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes
on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
G. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have one side elevation where
there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a
minimum of 7 feet.
H. 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be
recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and shall be with wood or colored
aluminum window frames (no mill finished).
I. The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to
one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
J. The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
village.
K. A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any on residence.
L. At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the
units within this village.
M. Windows shall be phased to maximum privacy. Windows shall be located so
that they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible
landscaping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
N. At least three different roof colors shall be used on this project.
O. A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations
of these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer,
wood trim, stucco and stone.
Village O Design Guidelines 4 December 22, 1994
P. At least 15% of the units in Village O shall be one story.
6. GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20' by 20'.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of-451 20'
between the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 15% of the units in this village shall have three door garages.
Units with three car garages shall be distributed throughout the project. Three
car garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage
doors all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car
garage door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12".
Driveways serving three car garages shall have a maximum width of 24' at the
back of the sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at
the entrance to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3" rather
than being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone). Accessory structures constructed in
conformance with this standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit for this project unless the lot coverage as provided for in these
guidelines would be exceeded.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village O Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identify the Village and provide directional information. All
Signage will be developed in accordance with the Village O Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village O Design Guidelines 5 December 22, 1994
10 LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and
setbacks from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains
shall be limited as follows:
Street Maximum % of Lots
<2.5%
<_2.5 - 5%
<5 - 7.5%
<7.5- 12%
50%
75%
90%
100%
11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
All development in Village O shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 21.45
(Planned Development Ordinance) of the Carlsbad Municipal code, except as may be
modified for the approved affordable housing incentives package for the combined
affordable housing site.
12. COMMON RECREATION AREA
The common passive recreational area between Melrose Avenue and Street O-B shall
have turf, benches and one combination plan\y equipment system and two or three of
the stand alone play equipment from the following list:
Combination Play Equipment Systems
600-548
600-0069
137-4 Don Mills
137-7 Belmont
139-2 Madison
"S" Horizontal Ladder, 90 degree Crawl Tube, "S" Tube
Slide, Spiral Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide,
Spiral Slide
Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam,
2'x6' Wide Slide, 8' Single Slide
Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, Curved Tube Slide,
Horizontal Ladder, 3 Platforms
Open Super Slide, Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, 2
Platforms
1/2 Tube, 1/2 Open Curved Slide, Chain Net Climber,
Balance Beam, Two Platforms
Village 0 Design Guidelines December 22, 1994
140-1 Lakefield Tube Slide, Open Slide, Tire Swing, Horizontal Ladder,
Access Ramp, Two Platforms
139-1 Oakville Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balance Beam,
Horizontal Ladder, Three Platforms
Note: Model numbers refer to Playworld Systems and Children's Playground, Inc. Models.
Others may be substituted if approved.
Stand-Alone Equipment
Platform Seesaw Wood Parallel Bars
6' Slide Wood Horizontal Ladder
8' Circular Slide Spring Mates
7' Climber Whirl
Spring Platform Tot Sand Box
Wood Swings Tire Swing
13. SENSITIVE LOTS
Lots 1-14
A. Lots 1-14 are located within the boundaries of the Special Parks Design
District established by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. These units shall be
designed and screened so that they are compatible with the existing buildings
and vegetation within the Rancho Carrillo Community Park. Where possible,
units shall be plotted to provide the maximum possible setback from the tops
of slopes.
B. Final Landscape Plans submitted for building plan check shall ensure that
special attention is given to the selection of the plant species selected for the
landscaping of these lots, especially the slopes adjacent to Carrillo Way. No
more than a maximum of 30% of each unit on lots 1-14 should be visible from
the historical building compound at a point five years after the initial planting.
Fast growing alders and/or eucalyptus in combination with California live oaks
will be planted on the slopes to screen these units from the park site.
14. SECOND UNITS
Up to 10% of the lots in Village O may be developed with second dwelling units.
A greater number of second dwelling units may be allowed if approved under a
Density Bonus to be approved as a part of the Housing Agreement (required pursuant
to SDP 94-01) between the applicant and the City. All second units shall be
developed pursuant to Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and
Village O Design Guidelines 7 December 22, 1994
processed in conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit
Ordinance, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and the Village O Design Guidelines.
The developer of Village O has the option to develop the second units concurrently
with the primary units . The units may be approved as part of the Minor Planned
Development Permit that approves the floor plans and architecture for Village O as
long as they are processed consistent with Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
15. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is
considered a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director.
However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the
approved project. Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the
requirements of Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village O Design Guidelines 8 December 22, 1994
Exhibit A
Matrix for Compliance with Design Guidelines - Village O
Requirement
Single Story Edge
25% of all units to have a single story edge for 40%
of the building perimeter.
Building Planes
40% of all units to have at least 3 separate building
planes on street side elevations.
Lot Drains _ __
Street Grade Less than 2.5% - 50% of lots.
Street Grade Between 2.5% and 5% - 75% of lots.
Street Grade Between 5% and 7.5% - 90% of lots.
Street Grade Between 7.5% and 12% - 100% of lots.
Side Elevations ',
At least 50% of the units shall have one side elevation
where there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the
sideyard setback averages a minimum of 7 feet.
Garage* ' '
No More than 15% of the units shall have 3 door garages.
Single Story Unite
15% of all units Shall be one story.
Number of Units
Complying to Date
Including This Phase
Units In
This Phase
Total Units
Plotted to date
Remaining
Units
Total Units Required
to Comply with This
Requirement
IM
Matrix for Plotting Compliance - Village O
Requirement:
No individual floor plan shall be plotted for more than 60% of
the total units on any individual street.
Street O - A
Floor Plan A
Floor Plan B
Floor Plan C
Floor Plan D
Proposed Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
to Date
Street O - B
Floor Plan A
Floor Plan B
Floor Plan C
Floor Plan D
Proposed Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
to Date
Note: This matrix is a sample only and may be modified prior to plan check.
VILLAGE O
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
Village O consists of 51 residential and 1 open space lots in the southern portion of
the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139E). The lots range in size from 5,690 to
13,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 7,859 square feet.
2. UNIT MIX & SIZE
The project shall include a mix of floor plans and elevations as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Number of floor plans 3 8
Number of front elevation
treatments per floor plan 3 4
Single Story Units - Maximum Size - 2,300 sq.ft. (including the area of a
second dwelling unit)
Two Story Units - Maximum Size - 3,500 sq.ft. (including the area of a
second dwelling unit)
Village O Design Guidelines 1 January 12, 1995
PLOTTING
All units shall be plotted within the prescribed building envelope as shown on the
architectural data exhibit approved as a part of the tentative map for Village O.
Plotting shall alternate floor plans so that no individual floor plan is plotted for more
than 60% of the total units on any individual street. No two units with identical front
facades shall be plotted closer than 100 feet of each other on the same street. Units
may be plotted in phases or sequences as long as they are plotted in conformance with
the requirements of the Village O Design Guidelines. The units plotted on these lots
may not utilize the entire building envelope. Future homeowners shall have the
ability to construct a room addition within this envelope, as long as the overall
building coverage does not exceed 50% of the lot area. Room additions or accessory
structures that are within the building envelopes will not require an amendment to the
Planned Development Permit for this project.
The matrix included as Exhibit A of these conditions shall be attached to the plot plan
for each building phase of this tentative map. This matrix shall show how each phase
and the overall project complies with the percent requirements of Sections 3
(Plotting), 5 D, E, & G (Architecture), 6 C (Garages) and 10 (Lot Drains) of these
guidelines. This matrix may be modified subject to the approval of the Planning
Director when the floor plans and elevations for this tentative map are approved.
SETBACKS
Melrose
Front
Rear
Side
All units shall maintain a 50' minimum setback from Melrose ROW
In accordance with Section 21.45.090(b)(2)(A) of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code. Zoning Ordinance, the front yard setback shall
be 20 feet, however the front yard setback may be varied to a 15
foot average with a 10 foot minimum to the livable portion of the
unit OP to garages turned 90 degrees from the street
All units shall have a minimum 15' deep, flat usable rear yard.
5' minimum
10' minimum for corner lots from street ROW and large slopes (Per
grading ordinance). Building separation should range from 10' - 20' as
shown on the Architectural Data Exhibit.
Village O Design Guidelines 2 January 12, 1995
Building Separation All units in Village O shall comply with the building separation
requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance, Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 21.45.090(5). If the applicant decides
to develop all of the lots along Streets O-B & O-C with two
story units, without a 20' building separation, then 10 or fewer
units in a row shall be constructed. In such a case Lots 6 & 49
shall be restricted so as not to permit the construction of a
dwelling unit. The applicant shall decide whether Lots 6 & 49
will be developable lots prior to approval of Final Map.
5. ARCHITECTURE
A. The architectural theme of this project shall be selected from one or more of
the following styles that have been approved as a part of the Rancho Carrillo
Master Plan:
Spanish Colonial Revival Craftsman
California Mission Bungalow
Monterey Prairie
Spanish Eclectic California Ranch
Whichever style or combination of styles is used in Village O, it shall be
compatible with the surrounding Villages and the structures within Carrillo
Ranch Park as determined by the Planning Director. Architectural styles are
described in the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, General Community
Development Standards pages 31-35.
B. When three or more 2 story units are in a row situated less than 15 feet apart,
at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a
depth of not less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof
covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for
the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type
roofs falling to a single story element).
C. When three 2 story units in a row situated between 15-20 feet apart, at least
one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of
not less than 5 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the
single story units shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit (this in not intended to preclude long shed type roofs
falling to a single story element).
Village O Design Guidelines 3 January 12, 1995
D. Thirty-three per cent of all units shall have a single story edge for 40% of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline, the single story
edge shall be a minimum depth of 3 feet. The units qualifying under the 33%
shall be distributed throughout the project.
E. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have at least four separate
building planes on street side elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall
be 18 inched and shall include, but not be limited to building walls, windows
and roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most plane
and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet/ A plane must be a
minimum of 30 square feet to receive credit under this section.
F. Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in paragraph £ for
front elevations, except that the minimum depth between front and back planes
on the rear elevation shall be 3 feet.
G. At least 50% of the units in this project shall have one side elevation where
there are sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a
minimum of 7 feet.
H. 50% of exterior openings (doors/windows) in the front of each unit shall be
recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and shall be with wood or colored
aluminum window frames (no mill finished).
I. The building materials for each unit shall be compatible and complementary to
one another as well as being compatible with surrounding villages.
J. The design of the units shall be varied to create variety and interest within the
village.
K. A maximum of two chimneys shall be permitted on any on residence.
L. At least three color schemes shall be provided for the stucco portions of the
units within this village.
M. Windows shall be phased to maximum privacy. Windows shall be located so
that they are offset from windows in adjacent units, where that is not possible
landscaping or opaque windows shall be used to provide privacy.
N. At least three different roof colors shall be used on this project.
O. A combination of the following materials may be used in the front elevations
of these units to create a varied streetscape: vinyl, brick or brick veneer,
wood trim, stucco and stone.
Village O Design Guidelines 3 January 12, 1995
P. At least 15% of the units in Village O shall be one story.
6. GARAGES
A. All garages shall have a minimum interior dimension of 20' by 20*.
B. All garages that face on to the street shall provide a minimum of 20' between
the face of the garage and the ROW to allow for driveway parking.
C. No more than 15% of the units in this village shall have three door garages.
Units with three car garages shall be distributed throughout the project. Three
car garage units shall be a mix of units with three separate one car garage
doors all on the same plane and units with a two car garage door and a one car
garage door combination. The doors shall be offset a minimum of 12".
Driveways serving three car garages shall have a maximum width of 24' at the
back of die sidewalk and have a curvilinear side flaring to its greatest width at
the entrance to the garage.
D. Garage doors shall be designed to set into the walls a minimum of 3" rather
than being flush with exterior walls.
7. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Accessory structures shall be permitted as allowed by section 21.10.050(1)(D) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (R-l Zone). Accessory structures constructed in
conformance with this standard shall not require an amendment to the Planned
Development Permit for this project unless the lot coverage as provided for in these
guidelines would be exceeded.
8. WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be provided as shown by the Village O Landscape Exhibit.
9. SIGNAGE
Signage will be provided to identifyJhe Village and provide directional information. All
Signage will be developed in accordance with the Village O Landscape Exhibit. The exact
location of these signs will be determined prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Signage shall be approved pursuant to Chapter 21.41 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village O Design Guidelines 5 January 12, 1995
10 LOT DRAINS
Private lot drains are approved for lots fronting on steep streets. Lot drains allow pad
elevations to be lowered along steeper streets thereby increasing rear yards and
setbacks from the tops of slopes. The maximum number of lots using these drains
shall be limited as follows:
Street Maximum % of Lots
<2.5%
<2.5 - 5%
<.5 - 7.5%
<7.5 - 12%
50%
75%
90%
100%
11. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
All development in Village O shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 21.45
(Planned Development Ordinance) of the Carlsbad Municipal code, except as may be
modified for the approved affordable housing incentives package for the combined
affordable housing site.
12. COMMON RECREATION AREA
The common passive recreational area between Melrose Avenue and Street O-B shall
have turf, benches and one combination plan\y equipment system and two or three of
the stand alone play equipment from the following list:
Combination Play Equipment Systems
600-548
600-0069
137-4 Don Mills
137-7 Belmont
139-2 Madison
"S" Horizontal Ladder, 90 degree Crawl Tube, "S" Tube
Slide, Spiral Climber, Wood Arch Bridge, 3-Rail Slide,
Spiral Slide
Horizontal Ladder, Swinging Bridge, Balance Beam,
2'x6' Wide Slide, 8' Single Slide
Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, Curved Tube Slide,
Horizontal Ladder, 3 Platforms
Open Super Slide, Chain Net Climber, Tire Climber, 2
Platforms
1/2 Tube, 1/2 Open Curved Slide, Chain Net Climber,
Balance Beam, Two Platforms
Village O Design Guidelines January 12, 1995
140-1 Lakefield Tube Slide, Open Slide, Tire Swing, Horizontal Ladder,
Access Ramp, Two Platforms
139-1 Oakville Suspension Bridge, Tire Climber, Balance Beam,
Horizontal Ladder, Three Platforms
Note: Model numbers refer to Playworld Systems and Children's Playground, Inc. Models.
Others may be substituted if approved.
Stand-Alone Equipment
Platform Seesaw Wood Parallel Bars
6' Slide Wood Horizontal Ladder
8' Circular Slide Spring Mates
7' Climber Whirl
Spring Platform Tot Sand Box
Wood Swings Tire Swing
13. SENSITIVE LOTS
Lots 1-14
A. Lots 1-14 are located within the boundaries of the Special Parks Design
District established by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. These units shall be
designed and screened so that they are compatible with the existing buildings
and vegetation within the Rancho Carrillo Community Park. Where possible,
units shall be plotted to provide the maximum possible setback from the tops
of slopes.
B. Final Landscape Plans submitted for building plan check shall ensure that
special attention is given to the selection of the plant species selected for the
landscaping of these lots, especially the slopes adjacent to Carrillo Way. No
more than a maximum of 30% of each unit on lots 1-14 should be visible from
the historical building compound at a point five years after the initial planting.
Fast growing alders and/or eucalyptus in combination with California live oaks
will be planted on the slopes to screen these units from the park site.
Village O Design Guidelines 7 January 12, 1995
14. SECOND UNITS
Up to 10% of the lots in Village O may be developed with second dwelling units.
A greater number of second dwelling units may be allowed if approved under a
Density Bonus to be approved as a part of the Housing Agreement (required pursuant
to SDP 94-01) between the applicant and the City. All second units shall be
developed pursuant to Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and
processed in conformance with the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit
Ordinance, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and the Village O Design Guidelines.
The developer of Village O has the option to develop the second units concurrently
with the primary units . The units may be approved as part of the Minor Planned
Development Permit that approves the floor plans and architecture for Village O as
long as they are processed consistent with Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
15. MINOR MODIFICATIONS
A cumulative change to five or less of these provisions of these guidelines is
considered a minor modification and may be approved by the Planning Director.
However, each change must be determined to be in substantial conformance with the
approved project. Second dwelling units shall be processed pursuant to the
requirements of Section 21.10.015 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Village O Design Guidelines 8 January 12, 1995
v
Rancho Carriilo Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report EXHBTT I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
A. Agriculture
Impact. Possible soil contamination from agricultural chemicals formerly used or stored on the
/• /. site.
Mitigation. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigation recommendations, if necessary, to City
Planning Department and 7 our.ty Health Department 2) Mitigation to be made a condition of
tentative maps approved under the Master Plan. 3) Report on completed remediation to be
submitted to City Planning Department and County Health Department upon completion.
Master Plan Implementation. A soils report for the property owned by Continental Homes and
the property being dedicated for park purposes has been received by the Planning Department
Any mitigation required for soils contamination indicated by this report will be remedied prior
to issuance of a grading permit. Impacts may occur if additional pesticide concentrations and/or
hazardous waste materials or containers are found during development, in which case the
referenced mitigation would be applicable. Soils reports for other properties within the Master
Plan will be required with the submittal of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2)
Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Completion of construction of each
tentative map subdivision.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approved without necessary conditions. 2) No final
maps, building or grading permits issued until remediation report submitted.
Impact. Possible conflict between earlier stages of Master Plan development and continued
' ~] agricultural use of other portions of the site, including agricultural chemical use, irrigation
^ runoff, and odor.
Mitigation. Each tentative map must provide a list of performance and impact criteria specified
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffering, to ensure the phasing development is
compatible with continued agricultural use.
%
Master Plan Implementation. There will be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consistent
with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use.
Clieckpoims. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2)
Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Construction of each tentative map
subdivision. _...
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
\
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approved without necessary conditions. 3) Inspection
of construction by grading inspectors. No building permits issued until performance criteria are
implemented.
B. Biology
General Note. To ensure the implementation of all mitigation for potential impacts to biological
resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior to
[5 approval of each tentative map, as appropriate, show evidence to the City Planning Department
that a qualified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor all relevant mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, supervise implementation of mitigation, and file a
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upon completion of major
components of biological mitigation requirements.
-/ •}_ Impact- Implementation of the Master Plan will directly impact wetlands on-site and, by
j 2 " construction of a sewer line in the right of way for Carrillo Way to the west, off-site.
Mitigation. The applicant for the project shall either restore and enhance riparian habitat at an
appropriate area ratio to impacts or snail participate in a city-wide mitigation program through
the City's Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the
City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Federal dean Water Act
Master Plan Implementation. No mitigation required for offsite under sewer alignment
currently proposed by applicant north of Carrillo Way alignment Such alignment has no
wetland impacts.
Checkpoints. Approval of the first tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- or
off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Party. City Planning and Engineering Departments, California Department of
Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Sanctions. No grading map under the Master Plan.
Impact. If the project is not reconfigured to substantially avoid populations of San Diegp
thommint and thread-leaved brodiaea, development will significantly impact those species.
Mitigation. To partially mitigate impacts, the mitigation plans for San Diego thommint and
thread-leaved brodiaea shall be implemented, modified as specified in the EIR and after review
^r • I and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of approval of tentative maps under the Master Plan.
p To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accomplished prior to construction resulting
in impacts.
Master Plan Implementation. Villages T and U have been reconfigured to avoid impact to
thommint. Village G has been reconfigured to minimize impacts to Brodiaea.
Oieckpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps. 3) Prior to
construction causing impacts.
&
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consulting biologist
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps for Village G without acceptable mitigation
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
Impact. Potential for future disturbance of open space areas.
Mitigation. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open space, biological mitigation
areas, buffer areas, and naturalized areas to avoid disturbance of the natural habitats as a
condition of tentative maps.
Oieckpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) Gty Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without depiction of acceptable open space
easements and condition to dedicate conservation easements over natural open space.
,<*"
i
Impact. Possible predation or disturbance of California gnatcatchers or other sensitive wildlife
species by future residents or domestic pets.
Master Plan Implementation. No approval of Tentative Maps for affected Villages without
mitigation condition, if any, required by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Department of Fish and Wildlife.'
Mitigation. As determined by above referenced agency.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No Tentative Map approved without mitigation, if any, imposed by referenced
lead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant areas by non-native landscaping species.
Mitigation. As a component of the landscaping plans for affected Villages, revegetation plan
for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be prepared by a qualified biologist, and landscaping
plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by the biologist
Checkpoints. I) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Completion of landscaping and revegetation.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without satisfactory landscaping and revegetation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat areas during grading and construction.
Mitigation. The consulting biologist shall supervise surveying and staking of native habitat areas
and monitor grading and construction.
!; C
Oteckpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Report by consulting biologist
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting biologist.
Sanctions. I) No approval of tentative map without proper mitigation condition. 2) No
issuance of building or occupancy permits until consulting biologist's report is submitted to the
Planning Department.
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and
construction.
Mitigation. Due to conflicting biologist's opinions regarding mitigation, final mitigation plan,
if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or construction in restricted area, if any.
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
f\/Z, '"\ Mitigation. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away
'' from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement plan checks. 3)
Construction of improvements near conservation easement areas with report to Planning
Department by consulting biologist.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Deportments. 2) Consulting biologist
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without m^riprinn conditions. 2) No approval
of grading oj improvement plans without proper mitigation specified. 3) No issuance of
building or occupancy permits without properly accomplished mitigation.
Impact. Potential for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat areas from erosion and sedimentation
from the project.
Mitigation. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
CJieckpoints. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Responsible Party. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
C. Cultural Resources
Impact. Possible vandalism due to increased human presence to archaeological site SDI-
12,740B.
Mitigation. The site shall be capped with fabric, soil, and vegetation as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained
by the tentative map applicant.
Master Plan Implementation. This site is located on site to be dfftiratfd to City of Carlsbad
for parkland. The capping of this site will be the responsibility of the City of Carlsbad.
CJieckpoints. 1) Submittal of development plans for park site. 2) Approval of such plans.
3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon completion
of work and prior to commencement of development of park site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting archaeologist, City planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of site development plan without mitigation plan. 2) No grading
permits to be-issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4691B.
Mitigation. A data recovery program as specified in the EER. must be required as a condition
of the tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist
retained by the tentative map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
r» - L-J- Master Plan Implementation. Mitigation of this ate win not be required unless this area is
disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeologist
submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any grading for
construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4687.
Mitigation. Capping of the site as specified in the ER as a condition of any tentative map
/, affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentative
r, ) map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or construction affecting the site.
Clieckpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting
archaeologist.
•*i*air
Sanctions. 1) Submittai of tentative map not complete without mitigation plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 3) Mb building permits to be issued until
mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City planning Departments.
Impact. Encroachment of proposed development of the Master Plan on the rural, "early
California" setting of the Leo Carrillo historic site.
Mitigation. Establishment and implementation of a special design district as required under
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
CJieckpoints. See Land Use Compatibility section.
Responsible Party. See Land Use Compatibility section.
Sanctions. See Land Use Compatibility section.
D. Paleontological Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant fossils, especially in the Santiago and Lusardi
Formation, by grading and construction.
*'\ Mitigation. Monitoring of grading by a paleontologist, with recovery and curation of any
" significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EQL Monitoring is to be performed under the
direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by the applicant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting paleontologist
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting
paleontologist.
Sanctions. 1) Approval of tentative map not complete without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting paleontologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
X
Impact. Major drainage facility design wfll be required to avoid potential adverse effects of
erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
Mitigation. As a condition of approval each tentative map, the applicant shall submit a
hydrology analysis addressing required flood attenuation, runoff flow reduction/siltation, and
r \ proper sizing of drainage facilities.£-•
Master Plan Implementation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tentative map.
Responsible Party. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of approval.
Impact. Major drainage facilities wfll have to be constructed to avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
?— Master Plan Implementation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The final decision-malting body shall approve a Financing Plan addressing the
source and use of funds for the construction of all required drainage facilities prior to recording
the first Final Map or the issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever is first.
CJieckpoints. Recording of first final map or issuance of first grading or building permit, each
tentative map.
Responsible Party. City Engineering Department
Sanctions. No recording of final map or issuance of grading or building permit without
Financing Plan guarantee for construction of required drainage facilities.
Impact. Potential erosive or flooding damage to structures in Leo Canillo Ranch Park due to
runoff from the developed site entering the drainage south of the part
Mitigation. An hydrology analysis for the drainage south of the park shall be submitted with
the applicable tentative map or prior to issuance of advanced grading permit for Melrose
Avenue, and an appropriate drainage system shall be required prior to the issuance of the first
grading permit affecting the area and constructed concurrent with the grading of the affected
area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative maps. 2) Issuance of first grading permit.
Responsible Party. 1) Engineering Department 2) Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper drainage system shown. 2) No
issuance of building permits until drainage system implemented.
Hydrology and Water Quality 10
Impact. Installation of the proposed storm drain between Villages R and T in Open Space Area 13
would disturb sensitive biological resources in die open space area.
Mitigation. The storm drain shall be relocated to run south from Village Q to connect to a storm
drain in either El Fuerte Street or Cborlho Street
£•'•- Master Plan Implementation. This storm drain has been relocated into areas that will be graded as a
pan of the development of Villages Q and R wherever possible to avoid sensitive habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) SubmittaJ of tentative map for Villages Q and R including me storm drain. 2)
Approval of Village Q and R tentative map. 3) Completion of storm drain construction.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department. 3) City
Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not complete without showing storm drain in proper
location. 2) No approval of tentative map without storm drain shown in proper location. 3) No
issuance of building permits for tentative map until storm drain properly constructed.
Impact. Potential for increased on-site erosion and increased sedimentation downstream when ground
surface is disturbed during grading and construction.
Mitigation. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must be prepared for each development
submittai, approved by the City Engineer, and implemented during construction.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in die Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits wimout Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
Impact. Potential impacts of urban pollutants from die developed site affection water quality in
Batiquitos Lagoon.
Mitigation. Discharge of runoff from developed areas into naturalized channel^ and public education
information distributed to property owners.
Master Plan Implementation. A detailed Hydrological Study must be approved prior to issuance of a
grading permit for the grading necessary to construct die Circulation Element Roadways.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative maps. 2) Completion of construction of drainage
channels. 3) Close of escrow to property owners.
V,.,.
Hydrology and Water Quality 11
Responsible forties. 1) City Engineering Depanmett. 2) City Engineering Department.
3) Developers
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without proper design of runoff drainage facilities. 2)
No issuance of building permits unless runoff drainage facilities properly constructed.
Impact. Potential for grease, oil, and other traffic-related pollutants from paved surfaces to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff.
Mitigation. Best management practices shall be employed to prevent urban pollutants from entering
i City waterways in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System municipal
' stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits widiout Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impact. Geologic conditions potentially unsuitable for development on the site wimout remediation
include soils unsuitable for load-bearing or with adverse settlement potential, old landslide areas and
claystone beds, and high-groundwater in alluvial sofls.
<- \\ Mitigation. Remedial grading will be needed to establish firm footings for structures and fills and to
correct adverse settlement and alluvial soils over shallow gtoundwater. A soils engineer and
engineering geologist shall be retained by each tentative map applicant to review detailed grading
plans, prepare a detailed soil and geologic investigation, monitor construction, and assure compliance
with the Master Plan geologic investigation and me City Grading Ordinance.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative map. 2) Approval of each tentative map and issuance of
grading permit. 3) Completion of construction.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department. 3)
Consulting soils engineer and engineering geologist, dry Engineer.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative map submhtal not complete without detailed soil and geologic investigation
2) No tentative map approval without sou" and geologic investigation and appropriate conditions. 3)
No issuance of building permits without evidence of proper mitigation.
Air Quality 12
G. Air Quality
Impact. Potential for significant direct impacts to regional air quality due to increases in pollutant
emissions caused by project traffic.
Mitigation. Implementation of Master Plan measures including bike lanes and pedestrian trails, and
requirement for applicants for future tentative maps to work witb North County Transit District to
provide bus routes and stops as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. I) Submittal of tentative maps not complete without appropriate mitigation measures. 2)
No approval of tentative maps without application conditions.
H. Land Use
Impact. Development of the Master Plan would encroach 00 the "early California" setting of Carrillo
Ranch Park, including the elimination of the northern entry to the ranch compound.
\ Mitigation. A Special Park Design District shall be established for development surrounding the park,
including special controls on setbacks, landscaping, and architectural details and an entry through the
park through Village S. The design district standards will be included in me Master Plan and
subsequent tentative maps will be evaluated for conformance by the Planning Commission.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of the Master Plan. 2) Approval of tentative maps that include part of
the design district.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning Department 2) City Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of the Master Plan without establishment of a park design district and
development standards. 2) No approval of tentative maps containing pan of the design district
without setting forth district development standards.
Impact. The City of Carlsbad has no review authority over Village S, which is in the park design
district, if it is developed as a school site by the San Marcos Unified School District.
Land Use 13
Mitigation. Agreement with the school district on design standards is encouraged, but cannot be
enforced by the Planning Commission. Without review of all development within the design district,
it is not within the power of the Lead Agency to assure that possible impacts are mitigated or avoided.
* ••) Checkpoints. No Lead Agency checkpoints without agreement with the school district.
\ "'
Responsible Parties. Responsibility for mitigation is within the authority of another jurisdiction and
not the City of Carlsbad.
Sanctions. None available to the City of Carlsbad under present circumstances.
Impact. Dedication of the open space link at the southwest corner of the property, where the link
crosses from one zone to an adjacent ownership, is not assured under the proposed Master Plan.
Mitigation. Assure continuance of the open space link as part of the Master Plan.
^ ';. Master Plan Implementation. Carlsbad's Open Space Advisory approved the open space link.
V* proposed by the Master Plan at their February 1993 meeting.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of Master Plan. 2) Approval of tentative map including Village T.
Responsible Parties. Planning Department.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without open space link.
Impact. Applicants for the Master Plan must obtain a letter from the San Marcos Unified School
District accepting the site proposed by applicants as possible school site area in compliance with the
Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
iU \v Mitigation. Agreement with the San Marcos Unified School District as part of Master Plan approval.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. Planning Department.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without agreement who the school district that complies with
the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan.
Visual AenheticsiGrading 14
I. Visual Aesthetics/Grading
Impact. Grading proposed by the Master Plan requires findings justifying grading volumes to be
approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer according to the Hillside Development Ordinance.
Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed grading volumes prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. Planning Director and City Engineer.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required findings.
Impact. Proposed grading for the Master Plan would exceed Hillside Development Ordinance
allowances for slope height and encroachment into 40 percent slopes without specified findings by the
decision making body.
'\ ^- Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed grading concurrent with approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of the Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. Decision making Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required findings.
Impact. Potential impacts of Master Plan development on the visually sensitive Carrillo Ranch Park
site, including Villages S, 0, and Q.
Mitigation. Applicable tentative maps to indicate an acceptable detailed landscape plan to reduce
potential impacts. Implement Special Park Design District recommended in EIR Land Use section.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning Department 2) City Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative nap sobmhtal not complete without detailed landscape plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map without appropriate detailed landscape plan.
VfoMd Aesthetics/Grading 15
Impact. Potentially significant impact of recreational vehicle storage in Open Space Area 13 on views
from existing residences,
Mitigation. Detailed landscape plan as pan of tentative map for Villages Q and R to effectively
screen views of recreational vehicle storage.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative map including recreational vehicle storage. 2) Approval of
tentative map including recreational vehicle storage.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning Department, 2) City Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not complete without appropriate landscaping plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map without appropriate landscaping plan.
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of noise barriers over six feet in height.
Mitigation. Detailed landscaping plan for tentative maps to provide adequate cover, texture, and
variation of vegetation to screen walls.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of any tentative map showing noise barriers over six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map snowing noise barriers over six feet in height.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative maps not complete without appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of applicable tentative maps without appropriate landscaping plan.
J. Circulation
Impact. The intersection of Palomar Airport Road and H ramitm Real is projected to have a level of
service F in the year 2000 afternoon peak hour. No additional improvements to this intersection are
currently proposed in the LFMP.\^ \
Mitigation. The City will continue to monitor traffic to determine confbrmance with LFMP standard
and to identify and implement improvements necessary to meet the standard.
Checkpoints. Construction of improv
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department
Sanctions. N» issuance of building permits if Growth
service are not met.
Visual Aesihetia/Gradimg 16
standards for traffic levels of
Impacts. Spacing of the first intersection on Paiomar Airport Road is 200 feet closer than Gty
standards allow.
Mitigation. Tentative maps shall comply with City road alignment and intersection spacing standards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Master Plan Implementation. The location shown on the proposed Master Plan has not been revised
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps that do not comply whh Gty road alignment and
intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the Gty Engineer.
Impact. As proposed, development of the Master Plan wodd require traffic signals at Paiomar
Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Melrose Avenge/entrances to Villages H, 0, and L.
Mitigation. Condition tentative maps to construct die necessary signals and improvements, or
determine the need for signals in traffic studies tor tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) submittal of applicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) Gty Engineering Department. 2) Gty Engineering Department
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without applicable conditions.
Impact. Certain revisions of the internal circulation system described in the EIR may be preferable
for environmental or circulatory reasons.
Mitigation. Traffic studies for applicable tentative maps shall determine in consultation with City staff
whether specified changes in the circulation pattern should be implemented as conditions of applicable
tentative maps.
Master Plan Implementation. Revisions to the Master Plan Circulation and proposed tentative maps
have already been made to addnss die recommendations of me EIR and approved by the City
Engineer.
Circulation 17
Checkpoints*-1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without applicable conditions.
K. Noise
Impact. Certain areas adjacent to major roads in the Master Plan area could experience future traffic
noise in excess of the City standards of 60 dBA CNEL
Mitigation. Tentative maps shall show appropriate wise barrieo as specified in the EIR or to dry
. \ standards to attenuate noise. If grading shown in the Master Plan for development in areas of
\— ^ excessive unattenuated noise is modified by tentative maps, the modifications shall be reviewed by me
City Engineer and a new acoustical study shall be performed and appropriate mitigation implemented
if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall have the option of requesting a reduction in height of
barriers over six feet to no less than six feet to reduce visual impacts per City policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Inspection of constructed improvements.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Engineering
Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval without proper barriers as a condition. 2) No issuance of subsequent
permits.
Impact. Second floors of some residential units adjacent to Circulation Element roadways could
experience interior noise levels in excess of the 45 dBA CNEL standard.
^ Mitigation. Proposed tentative maps shall be shown to have designs for multi-story residences next to
\_ ' Circulation Element roadways which would achieve interior noise levels of 45 dBA CNEL or less for
second or higher stories. Acoustical studies to daauumaie compliance may be required by me City
Engineer.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Inspection of constructed improvements.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Building Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval without proper barrieo as a condition. 2) No issuance of subsequent
permits.
'*•"»**•
Pabtic Factious ami Service* 18
L. Public Facilities and Services
. Impact. There is a potential for the LFMP pafoumace standard for park facilities to be exceeded
I \ depending on the timing of development and the status of odier fntnre parkland in Ory Park District
4.
Mitigation. Prior to the recordauon of any final nap under the Master Plan, sufficient parkland shall
be dedicated within Zone 18.
Checkpoints. Recordation of first final map under the Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. City Planning, Engineering, and Pads and Recreation Departments.
Sanctions. No recordation of final map without dedication of sufficient parkland within Park District
4.
Impact. The LFMP performance standard requires mat a school site in Zone 18 be deeded to the San
Marcos Unified School district (SMUSD) and thtt a financing plan be approved by the SMUSD prior
to recordation of any final map or issuance of any grading or building permit in Zone 18.
o
I ^ Mitigation. Compliance with the Zone 18 requirement.
Checkpoints. 1) Recordation of the first final map under the Master Plan. 2) Issuance of any
grading or building permit in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Planning And Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. No Final map recorded wimout LFMP requirement being met
Impact. Sewage generation could exceed treaonent capacity if residential development occurs in me
Master Plan area after 2005.
/? Mitigation. Implement measures specified in the LFMP for any tentative maps causing the potential
. impact to be realized.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittai of tentative maps after 2005. 2) Approval of tentative maps submitted
after 2005.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
f"
V.
and Service 19
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps after 2005 vfeftmt coaditioB requiring conformant with
LFMP requirements.
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Impact. Depending on regional planning for the expwk» of landfill capacity, mere is a potential for
solid waste generated from the Master Plan area to exceed disposal capacity.
\ Mitigation. Applicants for tentative maps propped • die Master Plan area shall demonstrate mat
A\ means of feasible solid waste disposal are available.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps for tne Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. I) No approval of tentative maps whho* demonstration of existing disposal capacity.