The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP 2021-0003; RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL; TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS; 2021-09-23Prepared by: Charlene Sadiarin, PE Transportation Engineer Ill TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS LEVELi RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL SDP 2021-0003 Carlsbad, California September 23, 2021 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Under the Supervision of.· Shankar Ramakrishnan, PE Associate Principal C OCT 1 4 2021 I . ., LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Linscott. Law & Greenspan, Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92111 858.300.8800 T 858.300.8810 F www.llgengineers.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background on Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND ................................................... 1 1.3 Project Location & Street Typology ................................................................................... 2 2.0 Analysis Approach & Methodology ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Analysis Approach .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) Analysis ............................................................. 6 2.2.1 Multi-Modal Facilities to be Included in Study Area ............................................. 7 2.2.2 Project Multi-Modal Study Area ............................................................................ 9 3.0 Proposed Project ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Trip Distribution for TSM Requirements ......................................................................... 11 3.3 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) .................................................................. 12 4.0 Multi-Modal (MMLOS) Analysis ........................................................................................... 16 4.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 MMLOS Results ............................................................................................................... 16 5.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 18 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial • APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Scoping Agreement B. MMLOS Worksheets LIST OF FIGURES SECTION-flGURE # PAGE Figure 1-1 Figure 1-2 Figure 1-3 Figure 2-1 Figure 3-1 Figure 3-2 Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................... 3 Project Area Map ............................................................................................................ 4 Site Plan .......................................................................................................................... 5 MMLOS Study Area ..................................................................................................... 10 Project Traffic Distribution ........................................................................................... 14 Project Traffic Assignment ........................................................................................... 15 LIST OF TABLES SECTION-TABLE# PAGE Table 1-1 Project Area Street Typology .............................................................................................. 2 Table 2-1 Multimodal Level of Service Criteria .................................................................................. 6 Table 2-2 MMLOS Point System & LOS Rating ................................................................................ 7 Table 2-3 Street Typology and Accommodated Modes ....................................................................... 9 Table 3-1 Trip Generation .................................................................................................................. 13 Table 4-1 MMLOS Analysis .............................................................................................................. 17 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers ii LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description LEVEL I TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL Carlsbad, California September 23, 2021 The Raceway Industrial Project ("Project") proposes the construction of an industrial building with approximately 238,949 square feet (sf) of warehouse space, 8,738 sf of office space, and 4,000 sf of mezzanine office space. The Project site is currently vacant. The Project Site is zoned Planned Industrial (P-M). The City of Carlsbad staff has determined that the proposed Project is consistent with the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND; therefore, vehicular impacts to local jurisdictions were previously evaluated as part of the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND traffic impact analysis. As further discussed in Section 2.1, the purpose of this report is to present the results of the Level I Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) required per the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (April 2018). A Level I TIA evaluates the Project study area per the City's multimodal level of service (MMLOS) methodology and guidelines. This report does not address the Project's CEQA impacts. 1.2 Background on Carlsbad Raceway Business Parle MND A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park, which includes the project site, was adopted on October 17, 2001. The Proposed Project is consistent with the 1,476,000 SF of industrial uses, which were approved as part of the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND. Currently, there is 912,260 SF of industrial uses built as part of the Carlsbad Raceway project with 563,740 SF available to be constructed. The Proposed Project consists of 251,687 SF which is within the available square footage. The Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND included the following transportation-related mitigation measures: ■ Prior to the recordation of a final map, the developer shall design, dedicate, and bond for the following roadways: o Melrose Drive as a Prime Arterial from existing terminus at the Carlsbad Nista boundary south to the intersection of Palomar Airport Road. Additional right tum lanes are required at Poinsettia A venue and at Palomar Airport Road. o Poinsettia Ave. ("B" Street) as an Industrial Collector from Business Park Drive to Melrose Drive. Additional widening may be required at the Poinsettia/Melrose intersection to accommodate turn lanes. o Intersection improvements to Faraday Ave at Melrose Drive including but not limited to: additional right-of-way, additional roadway, lane configuration, traffic signal, modification, and inter-connect, street signs, and roadway striping. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 1 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial * ■ Prior to recordation of final report, Faraday Ave. shall be financially guaranteed as a Secondary Arterial to be constructed from the existing terminus in the City of Vista west of Melrose Drive to the existing terminus in the City of Carlsbad at Orion Way. The Proposed Project is the last remaining parcel to be developed in the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND area and as such, all the transportation mitigation measures per the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND listed above, which assumes the full buildout, have all already been completed. Per the traffic impact analysis was prepared for the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND (Urban Systems Associates, May 200 I), the trip generation rate utilized for a planned industrial use on the Project site was 7 ADT trips per 1,000 square feet. Applying this rate to the Project results in a trip generation of 1,762 ADT, which is greater than the Project's trip generation of 1,450 ADT discussed in Section 3.1 of this report. The City of Carlsbad has determined that the Project's land uses and zoning are consistent with the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND. 1.3 Project Location & Street Typology The Project site is located south of Lionshead A venue between S. Melrose Drive and Eagle Drive. Palomar Airport Road is the major east-west roadway in the Project vicinity providing regional access to Interstate 5 and State Route 78. S. Melrose Drive is the major north-south roadway in the Project vicinity providing regional access to State Route 78. Streets such as Lionshead Avenue and Eagle Drive provide local mobility and access. Table 1-1 shows the Mobility Element typologies of these streets in the Project vicinity. TABLE 1-1 PROJECT AREA STREET TYPOLOGY Street Name Typology Palomar Airport Road Arterial - S. Melrose Road Arterial -- Lionshead A venue Industrial Eagle Drive Industrial Figure 1-1 shows the vicinity map. Figure 1-2 shows a more detailed Project area map. Figure 1-3 shows the Project site plan. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 2 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial ■ ' ii:ili:Pii N:\3332\Fisures Date, 3/18/2021 Time: 7:41 AM ---- Figure 1-1 Vicinity Map RA CE WA Y INDU STRIA L • ,,,--_/- eco111111c, Ii"" ... f The Crossings at Carlsbad ~,,.d r'J ,# 8 ' ;' s PBJomar A,jj,Por, ~a -,;_ -;. .. ~ ttia Park ~ - AVIARA LINSCOTT '· I LAW & GREENSPAN engineprs McClellan Palomar Airport-Crq ' ~~ -.i,I' ~'r {!'-'Ii io ~ -- Go o gle /!' 6"adny Ave pglomar Alrpott Rd j ~ i f c; i;, \B \,(\ , ~ ~Oj \ ~ ~ ~ fl,:~ .. ~ BRESSI RANCH 0 ' ! C, d) <a,-\ ;i-.., i ~ Project .. Site ! •• I •·--·--tlons~sd ,-~e [ _____ --J Leo Carrillo Ranch Historic Park ~ \,~ . e\\\~ vo\~ \ o,.. \O~ "\qB\1.d """"'•· 0 Figure 1-2 Project Area Map RA CEWAY IN DU STR I AL :J LINSCOTT I . ' LAW & GREE NSPAN engiueer~ ---------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------'-~----, ' ' ' I L LIONSHEAD AVENUE _,,. ( 0 Figure 1-3 Site Plan RACEWAY INDUSTR IA L ~- 2.0 ANALYSIS APPROACH & METHODOLOGY This section summarizes the analysis approach and methodology used to evaluate the Project study area. 2.1 Analysis Approach Given the Project's conformance with the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND and Carlsbad Raceway Specific Plan land uses, a Level I TIA is required per the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (April 2018). Level I TIA evaluates the Project study area per the City's multimodal level of service (MMLOS) methodology and guidelines. A Level I TIA requires multimodal analysis for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes, as appropriate, and calculation of vehicular trip generation. No vehicular analysis is required. A scoping agreement was prepared for the Project in accordance with the City of Carlsbad's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (April 2018). Appendix A contains a copy of the scoping agreement approved by City staff. While no vehicular LOS analysis is required, per City of Carlsbad Mobility Element policy (3-P .11 ), if the project adds 110 ADT or 11 peak hour trips in a single direction of travel to a street segment exempt from LOS standards, it is required to implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Systems Management (TSM) strategies. The Project will be required to prepare a TDM plan based on the City's TDM ordinance, which will be prepared separately. Trip distribution was prepared to assess the need for TSM measures. 2.2 Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) Analysis The City of Carlsbad requires multimodal level of service (MMLOS) evaluation for pedestrian, bicycle and transit/rideshare users of the public roadway system. The City organizes the street network by a system of "typologies", as defined by the City of Carlsbad Mobility Element. Depending on the typology, different streets may require different MMLOS evaluations. For each roadway user set (pedestrian, bicycle, transit}, general criteria groups have been identified. Table 2-1 shows a summary of the criteria for each roadway user set. TABLE 2-1 MUL TIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Roadway Users Pedestrian Bicycle Transit/Ridesharing Accessibility & Functionality Street Characteristics Access --•·· ,. Street Characteristics J<'.i~i_lity (each side of street) Connectivity ··------~---·· Crossing Characteristics Bikeway Design Transit Priority -------- Other Elements Connectivity/Conti~ity Service " --..... _ --··--···- -Amenities Adjacent Vehicle Parking L •.•.. ----~-· I-··--···-······-······-··-······· . -······· .. -Other Elements. -- Source: City a/Carlsbad. MMLOS Tool (September 2018). LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 6 ... Bicycle Accommodations Available Mobility Services LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial Each roadway's typography is evaluated for the particular set of roadway users based on sub-criteria, which is assigned "typology points". The following represents examples of sub-criteria within the "Transit and Ridesharing" general criteria group with corresponding points assigned: • Access -"ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both directions" (15 points assigned) • Connectivity -"Multiple transit routes on segment" (IO points assigned) • Transit Priority -"Dedicated right of way" (5 points assigned) • Service -"Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods" (IO points assigned) • Amenities -"Covered bus stops" (5 points assigned) • Bicycle Accommodations -"Bike parking available at the bus stop" (5 points assigned) • Available Mobility Services -"On demand rides hare services available" (IO points assigned) The MMLOS analysis evaluates each of the sub-criteria, totals the points for the subject street typology, and compares the points to the City's MMLOS Point System and LOS Rating, shown in Table 2-2. This table assigns a qualitative LOS to several ranges of points, similar to the application of LOS to ranges in delay for CEQA-analysis intersection operations. TABLE2-2 MMLOS POINT SYSTEM & LOS RATING Point Score LOS 90-100 A 80-90 B 70-80 C 60-70 D 50-60 E 0-50 F Source: City of Carlsbad. MMLOS Tool (September 2018). The City's Mobility Element calls for each street typology to achieve LOS Dor better operations for each mode subject to level of service standards. 2.2.1 Multi-Modal Facilities to be Included in Study Area In general, multi-modal facilities must be included in the study area based on the following criteria: Pedestrian: • All pedestrian facilities that are directly connected to project access points will be included in the study area. • All pedestrian facilities adjacent to the project development site that provide direct pedestrian access to the project site will be included in the study area. • The analysis of each pedestrian facility will extend in each direction to the nearest intersection or connection point to a multiuse trail or path. The study area will extend from the project site until a Mobility Element Road or Class I trail is reached in each direction. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 7 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial • Pedestrian facilities shall include all existing and proposed sidewalks, crosswalks, signalized pedestrian phases, and ADA-compliant facilities. • Pedestrian analysis need only be conducted for the side of the street where the project is located, unless the project is located on both sides of the street, in which case both sides of the street should be studied. • Pedestrian analysis shall be conducted for all roadway segments included in the study area that are subject to the Pedestrian MMLOS standards. Bicycle: • All facilities that bicyclists can legally use shall be included in the study area from each project access point extending in each direction of travel to the nearest intersection, dedicated bicycle facility, or connection point to a multiuse trail or path. Inventory and evaluation shall include all off-street and on-street bicycle paths, lanes, and routes. · • Bicycle analysis shall be conducted for both directions of travel (e.g. both sides of the street) of each facility included in the study area. • Bicycle analysis shall be conducted for roadway segments subject to the Bicycle MMLOS standards. Transit: • All existing transit lines and transit stops within ½ mile walking distance of the project site shall be included in the study area. • If the roadways within the study area are not subject to Transit MMLOS standards, no further transit analysis is required. • All transit lines located within a ½ mile walking distance of the project site will be analyzed according to Transit MMLOS. • All pedestrian routes linking the project site to a transit line within the ¼ mile walking distance boundary. • If no transit lines are provided, but the roadways within the study area are identified as subject to Transit MMLOS, the project shall complete the worksheet for "No Transit Located within½ Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment". • Transportation Demand Management Measures shall be identified for the project, which may include on-demand transit, flex, or other measures. Table 2-3 summarizes the modes accommodated by each street typology, and thus subject to Level of Service analysis, per the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 8 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial TABLE2-3 STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES Street Typology Vehicular Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Freeway Yes --Yes Arterial Street Yes No No Yes ~·------· -···· ··-- Identity Street No Yes Yes No ··----------------·--------· -·----------- Village Street No Yes Yes No ~ ·- Arterial Connector Street Yes Yes Yes No --------------·-. ... L ___________ ··-- Neighborhood Connector Street No Yes Yes No ·-··---· ·-·---···-·- Employment/ Transit Connector Street No Yes Yes Yes ·- Coastal Street No Yes Yes No ··- School Street No Yes Yes No ----I Industrial Street Yes No No Yes Local/Neighborhood Street No Yes Yes No Source: City of Carlsbad. General Plan -Mobility Element. 2.2.2 Project Multi-Modal Study Area Based on the study area criteria shown in Section 2.3.1, the MMLOS study area includes the following: Pedestrian None The Project site is located on Lionshead A venue, an Industrial Street, with secondary access to Eagle Drive, an Industrial Street. These streets are not subject to Pedestrian LOS analysis. Because Palomar Airport Road and S. Melrose Drive do not have direct pedestrian connection to the project access points and are classified as Arterial Streets, they are also not subject to Pedestrian LOS analysis. Bicycle None The Project site is located on Lionshead A venue, an Industrial Street, with secondary access to Eagle Drive, an Industrial Street. These streets are not subject to Bicycle LOS analysis. Because Palomar Airport Road and S. Melrose Drive do not have bicycle facilities that are directly connected to the project access points and are classified as Arterial Streets, they are also not subject to Pedestrian LOS analysis. Transit Palomar Airport Road (Arterial) / S. Melrose Drive (Arterial). This pair of transit stops (both directions of travel) are within the study area and less than ½ mile from the Project site. Palomar Airport Road (Arterial)/ Eagle Drive (Industrial). This pair of transit stops (both directions of travel) are within the study area and less than½ mile from the Project site. Figure 1-1 shows the MMLOS study area. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 9 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial ('~ ~ ((' -•o El Camino R11I ---~------------ r::.J Project site a Study bus stops -LOS exempt roadway N:U3321Flgwe Data: 3131/202'1 Trne: 10:34AM .a ' 'c) i ,. G, g \ r-, .. , ' .. I , .. , , -------: ---_ Uon~Al'I! I ----, , ' / Project Site i, I , , I I ,-•-•-------' '---.. ____ _ '--...... ----'-·--..._ --...··•1t1r "' ~ ~ ~,4 -I ~-jr-1·-\t1-{·,~ ;------J _________ ........... \ ) i _,,.., / i \ -Q t ~------ 1 -, _l-------,, __ .,, ~.,,, .,,.,,.,,,~-\ \--- / \ J ·-f 1----L N ,, A Figure 2-1 MMLOS Study Area RACEWAY INDU STRIAL 3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 3.1 Trip Generation The Project proposes the construction of an industrial building with approximately 238,949 square feet (sf) of warehouse space, 8,738 sf of office space, and 4,000 sf of mezzanine office space. Trip generation estimates for the Project were based on the SANDAG's Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). The proposed office space is ancillaryl to the warehouse operations; however, to be conservative, it was included in the trip generation calculations. Table 3-1 tabulates the Project traffic generation. The Project is calculated to generate 1,450 ADT with 191 AM (141 inbound / 50 outbound) peak hour trips and 212 PM (79 inbound / 133 outbound) peak hour trips. 3.2 Trip Distribution for TSM Requirements Project trip distribution was developed based on the available local and regional access as well as the trip distribution used in the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND Traffic Impact Analysis. Figure 3-1 shows the Project trip distribution. Figure 3-2 shows the Project trip assignment. Per the City's Mobility Element, the following segments in the Project vicinity are exempt from LOS standards: ■ Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and Melrose Drive ■ Melrose Drive between Palomar Airport Road and the northern City limit (southbound only) When a new development adds traffic to street facilities that are exempt from the LOS standard, the development is required by Mobility Element policy 3-P. l 1 to implement transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation systems management (TSM) strategies. The threshold for requiring TDM/TSM measures is 110 ADT or I I peak hour trips added to an exempt street segment. A TOM plan is independently required based on the City's TDM Ordinance and is provided separately. Using the trip generation shown in Table 3-1, the critical distribution percentages for daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour traffic are as follows: • ADT = 7.5% (110 / 1,450 Project ADT) • AM Peak Hour = 7.8% (11 / 141 Project AM inbound trips) • PM Peak Hour = 8.2% (11 / 133 Project PM outbound trips) 1 The minor amount of"office" space (which is 5% of the building area) are Administrative Offices for the Primary permitted/intended use (Industrial) and ancillary in nature (as defined in section 2 1.34.020 of the municipal code) LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 11 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial As shown in Figure 3-1, the Project traffic distribution exceeds the 7.5% corresponding to the ADT threshold at both of the exempt segments listed above. It is estimated to also exceed the threshold for AM and PM peak hour trips at both of the exempt segments listed above. Based on this, the Project may be required to contribute toward TSM measures. The Project will implement TSM measures to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. In order to meet the requirements of the Mobility Element policy, the Project will pay for the installation of one traffic signal controller. 3.3 Transportation Demand Management {TDM) To comply with the Mobility Element Policy 3-P. l l, the Project shall prepare a Tier 3 TDM to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A Tier 3 TDM Plan requires the following elements: • Existing conditions and context • Three required strategies ( designation of a transportation coordinator, distribution of new hire transportation information, and participation in citywide TDM program) • Selection of infrastructure improvements and programmatic strategies • Agreement to adhere to monitoring and reporting requirements as described in Section 2.7 of the Carlsbad TDM Handbook. A Tier 3 TDM plan is provided under a separate cover. In addition to the three required strategies, the Project proposes to implement the fo llowing TDM strategies to meet the City's Tier 3 TDM requirements: • Secure Bike Parking • Public Bike Racks • Bicycle Repair Station • Transit Stop Improvements • Preferential Parking for CarNanpools • Real-Time Travel Information Screens • TDM in Leases and Purchase Agreements • Non-standard Vehicle Policies • Marketing and Outreach • Ride-Matching Services LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 12 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial Daily Trip Ends (ADTs) Land Use Size Rate • ADT Proposed - Warehouse 238,949 SF 5/KSF I, 195 ·-------·-· --·- Office b 12,738 SF 20/KSF 255 Total Project Trips --1,450 Footnotes: TABLE 3-1 TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Hour %of ln:Out Volume ADT Split In Out 13% 70:30 109 46 - 14% 90:10 32 4 --141 50 PM Peak Hour %of ln:Out Volume Total ADT Split In Out Total -- 155 15% 40:60 72 107 179 - 36 13% 20:80 7 26 33 191 --79 133 212 a. Trip generation rates from SANDAG's (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Trafflc Generation Rates (or the San Diego Region April 2002 ("SAND AG Brief Guide"). b. lncludes 4,000 SF of mezzanine office space LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 13 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial ,. lP.'.''R~Tntl''\JI:! fJAr-·, '-crh.·rnh, !O Ii ;1I J1 ·, \ ,,,,----~"< / / 1-/ ' --to El Camlno Real i, I I I -----~--------- C:.".'J Project site xx % Project distribution -LOS exempt roadway N:\.13321Flgure Date: 3/'ll.12021 Tne: 10:35AM \ \ 1"~ ~ I o, ' ~ ~ ,,...,-- r-,_-. \ \ , ....... -I ...... ·--......... ------.._. -..._, ... -..,, --------------,I Project Site !/ I/ (. ________ .. ---------•-'i llonSh&aciAve --- ~-----------......____ ..... ~Oo ~ .... ....__ __ ..,,.. ... ,---, J ..._______ ~•10,,,,,,' ~~ _t_ '---,_-)--.___'---~%a, ~ flo \ \ , / ,J/11' ~---\ ---r-r -, r--\ \ \ \ ~-~ / ~ ~-'11, ' ' . --- q \, ~--___.------...., ~ ) r ,' ~~ 4 ----- ~-,• I [ -7 I __ _.L.- 250/o \ \-' j_, \ \ ____ j i-----L / N A Figure 3-1 Project Traffic Distribution RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL -~ ·,. \ _1.---1 \ r -, -, I \ " "'< .. ::.--798 __ ~--_ ,..._ ... ----------,1 ---....._ . i/ / Project Sile , _,_---362-~- / «- _ __.,, ; _______ !/ . , ___ _ (. _______ _ f ----------------s',90 ------~ ~ I ; r "9C• • ,, \ -\ l ~ ~·-·· ·--------___ J ~ \--( t' _f I' f.~·.::i Project site ., x,xxx Average Daily Traffic -LOS exempt roadway N:13331lflgure Data: 4JIIJ2021 Trne: 1:59 PM \-;, __ \ -r I L-, I 1 ------------· -·----- \, \ >✓- '""4 -----\ _] -< ~ _,,,,,,,--✓ \l /--\-' \ --,c. I \_ _,, \ .- ----. \ , " -I / 11 I , \ I \ , I -· , \ --1 ,. , ______ l_.---. --,- N A Figure 3-2 Project Traffic Assignment RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL 4.0 MUL Tl-MODAL {MM LOS) ANALYSIS 4.1 Background The existing multi-modal facilities in the vicinity of the Project site were evaluated using the City of Carlsbad's MMLOS Tool (September 2018). The MMLOS study area was selected based on the City's scoping requirements and the street typology of the roadway, which indicates which modes are subject to LOS standards on that facility type. 4.2 MMLOS Results Per City of Carlsbad TIA Guidelines, all existing transit lines within ½ mile of the Project site are included in the study area. Based on these criteria, Route 445, serving the Poinsettia COASTER station and Palomar College via Palomar Airport Road, has stops located at the intersections of Palomar Airport Road/ S. Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road / Eagle Drive, which are within ½ mile from the Project site and therefore are included in the study area. Table 4-1 summarizes the MMLOS analysis results for the Route 445 transit facilities at the Palomar Airport Road / S. Melrose Drive intersection and the Palomar Airport Road / Eagle Drive intersection. Both the westbound and eastbound stops at both intersections do not provide any stop amenities and currently fail to meet MMLOS standards as they are calculated at unacceptable LOSE and do not meet the minimum amenity requirements. The Project will be required to provide amenities at the eastbound and westbound stops located at the Palomar Airport Road/ S. Melrose Drive intersection as mitigation to improve Transit LOS to an acceptable level. The provision of a concrete pad, a bench and a trash can are required for each transit stop to obtain an acceptable level of service. As shown in Table 4-1, the both the westbound stop and eastbound stop at the Palomar Airport Road / S. Melrose Drive intersection would achieve acceptable LOS D or better following the provision of a bench and a trash can. Appendix B contains the detailed MMLOS worksheets. The Project will be required to provide amenities at the eastbound and westbound stops located at the Palomar Airport Road / Eagle Drive intersection as mitigation to improve Transit LOS to an acceptable level. These improvements include a concrete pad, a bench and a trash can at the eastbound transit stop and a bench and trash can at the westbound transit stop. As shown in Table 4- 1, the eastbound and westbound transit stops at the Palomar Airport Road / Eagle Drive intersection would achieve acceptable LOS D with the Project improvements. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 16 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial Location Route/ Direction 445/EB Palomar Airport Road I S. Melrose Drive 445/WB Palomar Airport Road / Eagle 445/EB Drive 445/WB LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers TABLE4-1 MMLOS ANALYSIS Transit LOS Existing With Improvements Improvements Total Total Score LOS Score 57 E 69 57 E 69 57 E 69 57 E 69 17 LOS Concrete Pad, D Bench, Trash Can Concrete Pad, D Bench, Trash Can Concrete Pad, D Bench, Trash Can D Bench, Trash Can MMLOSPomt Point Score LOS 90-IO0 A 80-89 B 70-79 C 60-69 D 50-59 E 0-49 F LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The following is a brief summary of key Project information and analysis results: • The City of Carlsbad staff has determined that the proposed Project is consistent with the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND; therefore, vehicular impacts to local jurisdictions were previously evaluated as part of the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND traffic impact analysis. • The Project proposes the construction of an industrial building with approximately 238,979square feet (sf) of warehouse space, 8,738 sf of office space and 4,000 sf of mezzanine office space. The Project Site is zoned Planned Industrial (P-M) and is in conformance with the approved Carlsbad Raceway Business Park MND. • The Project is calculated to generate 1,450 ADT, with 191 AM (141 inbound/ 50 outbound) and 212 PM (79 inbound/ 133 outbound) peak hour trips. • As the Project is a commercial project generating at least 110 ADT by employees, a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan is required and will be provided under separate cover. • The Project is calculated to add in excess of 11 peak hour trips to Palomar Airport Road between El Camino Real and Melrose Drive and southbound Melrose Drive between Palomar Airport Road and the northern City limit, which are both exempt from vehicular LOS standards. As such, the Project will implement TSM measures to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. • Palomar Airport Road is classified as an Arterial which requires Transit MMLOS analysis. The Project site is located between two intersections with stops for Route 445, both less than ½ mile from the site. The stops located at Palomar Airport Road / S. Melrose Drive and Palomar Airport Road/ Eagle Drive were evaluated for Transit MMLOS. • The stops for Route 445 in both the eastbound and westbound direction of travel at Palomar Airport Road / S. Melrose Drive were found to be lacking required amenities. The provision of a bench and a trash can at both the eastbound and westbound stops are required to provide an acceptable Transit LOS. The Project will provide a concrete pad, a bench and a trash can at both the eastbound and westbound stops. With the proposed improvements of a concrete pad, a bench and a trash can, both the westbound stop and eastbound stop at the Palomar Airport Road / S. Melrose Drive intersection would achieve acceptable LOS D or better. • The stops for Route 445 in both the eastbound and westbound direction of travel at Palomar Airport Road/ Eagle Drive were found to be lacking required amenities. The Project will provide a concrete pad, a bench and a trash can at the eastbound transit stop and a bench and trash can at the westbound transit stop, which would achieve acceptable LOS D with the proposed improvements. End of Report LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 18 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS TECHNICAL APPENDICES RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL SDP 2021-0003 Carlsbad, California September 23, 2021 LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Linscott.Law& Greenspan. Engineers 4542 Ruffner Street Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92111 858.300.8800 T 858.300.8810 F www.llgengineers.com APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Scoping Agreement B. MMLOS Worksheets & Supporting Data LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers APPENDIX A SCOPING AGREEMENT LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial 4/30/2021 ATTACHMENT A SCOPING AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY This Letter acknowledges the City of Carlsbad Traffic engineering Division requirements for the transportaion impact analysis of the following project. The analysis must follow the latest City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Study Guidelines dated April 2018. Case No. SOP 2021-0003 (DEV2020-0262) Project Name: Raceway Industrial Project Location: South Melrose Drive & Lionshead Avenue Project Description: Site Development Permit (SDP) to construct 238,949 square feet (SF) of warehouse space, 8,738 SF of office space, and 4,000 SF of mezzanine office space. Project site is located within the approved Carlsbad Raceway Specific Plan · Planning Area 2. Related Cases• SP No. EIR No. GPA No. 98-05 -------------------------------- C2No. Consultant Developer Name: LLG, Engineers Hines Address: 4542 Ruffner St. Suite 100 600 W. Broadway #115 San Diego, CA 92111 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (858) 300·8800 (858) 435-4000 A. Trip Generation Source: SAN DAG "(Not So) Brief Guide ... " Existing Land Use None Proposed Land Use Industrial (Warehouse+ Office) Existing Zoning Planned Industrial (P·M) Proposed Zoning Planned Industrial (P·M) Total Daily Trips Forecast Daily Trips 1,450 (Attach a trip generation table. Describe Trip Reduction Factors proposed and included in the trip generation table.) See attached Trip Generation Table 1 B. Trip Distribution: Ej Select Zone (Model Series (provide exhibit for detailed trip distribution and assignment.) See attached Trip Distribution (Figure A) and Trip Assignment (Figure B) C. Background Traffic : Phased project El No □Yes Phases: Please contact the Engineering Division or use the most recent provided data Model/ Forecast Methodology: n/a N:\3332\Scoping\Attachment A· Scoping Agreement 4/30/2021 0. Study Intersections: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, trip generation and distribution are determined, or comments.) MMLOS-only see attached Study Area Map (Figure C) 2 3 4 Palomar Airport Road / Melrose Drive (EB and WB stops) (Arterial/ Arterial -Transit only) Palomar Airport Road/ Eagle Drive (EB and WB stops) (Arterial / Industrial -Transit only) 5 6 7 8 E. Study Roadway Segments: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, trip generation and distribution are determined, or comments.) Per Mobility Element Policy 3-P .11, TSM/TDM-only for LOS-exempt roadways 1 Palomar Airport Road: El Camino Real to Melrose Drive 5 (TSM/TOM-only) 2 3 4 SB Melrose Drive: North City Limits to Palomar Airport Road (TSM/TDM-only) F. Other Jurisdictional Impacts 6 7 8 Is this project within any other Agency's Sphere of Influence or one-mile radius of boundaries? If so, name of Jurisdiction: Impacts to other agencies were addressed in the traffic analysis conducted as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Carlsbad Raceway Business Park G. Site Plan (attach a legible 11' x 17' copy) See attached Site Plan sheet 1 H. Specific Issues to be addressed in the Study (in addition to the standard analysis described in the Guidelines) (To be filled out by Engineering Division) D Yes A preliminary TOM plan consistent with the requirements of the TOM ordinance and TOM Handbook will be submitted. In accordance with Mobility Element 3-P.11, the project will implement TOM and TSM strategies. Recommended by: Shankar Ramakrishnan, PE April 30, 2021 Consultant's Respresentative Date Scoping Agreement Submitted on: April 30, 2021 Date Scoping Agreement Resubmitted on: Date Approved Scoping Agreement: City of Carlsbad Date Traffic Engineering Division N:\3332\Scoping\Attachment A -Scoping Agreement Table 1 Trip Generation Table Daily Trip Ends (ADTs) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size ln:Out Volume ln:Out Volume Rate Volume Credit % %ofADT Credit ¾ ¾of ADT Split In Out Total Split rn Out Total Proposed Project Warehouse 238.949 KSF 5 I KSF 1,195 13% 70 : 30 109 46 155 15% 40 : 60 72 107 179 Offleeb 12.738 KSF 20 /KSF 255 14% 90 : 10 32 4 36 13% 20 : 80 7 26 33 Total 1,450 141 50 191 79 133 212 Footnotes: a. Trip generation rates obtained from SANDAG's {Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). b. Includes 4 KSF of mezzanine office space I\JlgsvradS\proJect\3332\Trip Gen\Trip Generat,on,3332 • Apnl 2021 ✓----.. ,,/ I ) ~ ;,'a, ~ -to El Camino Real \ \ _) ---------------- r:·.J Project site xx % Project dis1ribution -LOS exempt roadway N;\3332\Flgure Data: lf31/2021 Tne: 10:35 AM ,o. ' . ..., ., 1) C'!. a\ •g ~ ti N -------- r-..... _ I \ 1~ 7.5°/o ------- f '. -,. , -_ -:-:_ _-.;_ =-~--:----___ -1--· lloi,ShoadAII& -------, -----·-- ' / ProJect sn, !/ i J . , __________ _ t ._______ I -----------\if()~ ----""-----0 ~ -~~ I .-..._ I~ j -----.....__ ~lornar A,£ lQ ~ ~Ro I*\-~ l>y / 7'· \ h I . ~--,~-' ',. ;--"'--~ 1 \~ / --0 I · ----'Si . g \- -) I ,,,-- ,,,..,,.,..- __,,..,,..,,,.,..,,.- '(/-,>( \ ~ ) r--) \ ---I I ·1 / j __ / \/ /~-~ 1--/ \ ' J -· N ,/ A Figure A Project Traffic Distribution RA CEWA Y INDU STR I AL r-..... I I ~ ~ " «'- '-....... __ 798 ------------- , I Project Site f I I ' __ ...., ___ _ ,---~------.. -- i I i r"~c• ; -. I ~ -·-·· ~; "'-l j ~'90 LloosJieaa ALie ~~ 4 362 "'I] __ , \,,,,., __ __.,---· ~/\ -\ 7 1·,y '1 "\J . II~ l ~ . ___________ __,,,,, ;----J ...__ __ - l ~ _ __.,,-\ _,,.-A 8 ,,,. 11 i___, ) I / r-- ---/ / _ _;____ ' j r:.:. J Projeci site x.xxx Average Daily Traffic -LOS exempt roadway N;l.33;!21Flgure Dale:4.1812021 T1111e: 1:59 PM ) v~ !' / ~/ . ~_// .~ / N / A Figure B Project Traffic Assignment RACEWAY I NDUSTRIAL /--~ I \ I I ~ J ~ I ) __ / I -lo El Camino R11I \ ---------------~-------I r::.J Project site El Study bus stops N:133l21Flgure Data: 3.131!2021 Tl'lle: 10::!A AM -· \ -~/ S1REET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES '6 \'g Street Street Typolog>' Pedestrian Bicycle Transit A11alysls Analysis A11alysls Palomar Aiiport Road Arterial Street No No Yes ---------------------------------------------------t---------·--·-------- Melrose Drive Arterial Street No No Yes ----------------------------------------------t--------------------- Lionshead A venue Industrial Street No No Yes ------------------------------------------------r----------·----·····- Eagle Drive Industrial Street No No Yes Source: Ci,y of Carl&ban'. G11J1erai Plll11 -Mobtlil)' Fleme-ra. Since die project rtquires a Le,,ei 1 TIA, no veilicuiar LOS analy~is is required ------- r-,_ I '• I '. ----___ -----Llo11Sheacj Ave ------------,r------- I /.. ii ---------~ ----------·-· \ ~ ~-----..._________------------- Project Site ~'q. .,,..--- Pc1~%ar '4i_ff>ort ..._ Ru r l-j ~y ; l 1 ' J \ ~1 ~,-1~- r--------- El \; '~-j )\ f---__________ ---... ~ ' y-_j_ l l I ~--' l __ 1.--· \ \ \ '\~~ .,,,,.,,,,,,,. \ 'y/ --1' / L-- i ----L j- / N A Figure C MMLOS Study Area RACEWAY INDUSTRIAL LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers APPENDIX B MMLOS WORKSHEETS LLG Ref. 3-20-3332 Raceway Industrial Project: Raceway Industrial Segment: Palomar Airport Road From El Camino Real To S. Melrose Drive Scenario:..:Ec..:x..:is..:cti'-'n"'g ___________________________________________ _ By: _____________________________________ _ Transit & Ridesharing MMLOS Criteria EB WB Criteria Points Points Assigned Points Assigned Transit Stop l..ocated Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment 50 (rail/bus) 0 0 No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 30 (bus) 30 (rail/bus) 20 20 No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 20 (bus) Access No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest transit stop 5 0 0 ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both directions 15 15 15 Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 0 0 Route provides a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility 15 15 15 Connectivity hub Route provides for a single transfer to reach a COASTER 5 5 5 station or mobility hub Transit priority Dedicated right of way 5 0 0 Transit priority during peak hours 5 0 0 Headways of• 15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 15 0 0 on weekdays Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 5 0 0 on weekdays Service Headways of 1 hour between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on 2 2 2 weekdays Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and 10 0 0 afternoon commute periods No more than 1 hour headways between 9 am and 5 pm on 5 0 0 weekends Covered bus stops 5 0 0 Bench 10 0 0 Amenities Well-lit stop that provides a sense of security 5 0 0 Trash cans 2 0 0 Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 0 0 Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 5 0 0 Accommodations Bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop 5 0 0 No Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment Area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will 60 0 0 Available Mobility promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes Services On demand rideshare services available 60 0 0 SeRment within FLEX service area 60 0 0 ·, :' u'. Total San: 57 57 Transit LOS: E E Project: Raceway Industrial Segment: Palomar Airport Road From S. Melrose Drive To Eagle Drive Scenario: _E_x_is_ti_n_,,g ___________________________________________ _ By: _____________________________________ _ Transit & Ridesharing MMLOS Criteria EB WB Criteria Points Points Assigned Points Assigned Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment 50 (rail/bus) 0 0 No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 30 {bus) 30 (rail/bus) 20 20 No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 20 (bus) Access No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest transit stop 5 0 0 ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both 15 15 15 directions Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 0 0 Route provides a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility 15 15 15 Connectivity hub Route provides for a single transfer to reach a COASTER 5 5 5 station or mobility hub Transit priority Dedicated right of wav 5 0 0 Transit priority during peak hours 5 0 0 Headways of-15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 15 0 0 on weekdays Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 5 0 0 on weekdays Service Headways of 1 hour between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays 2 2 2 Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and 10 0 0 afternoon commute periods No more than 1 hour headways between 9 am and 5 pm on 5 0 0 weekends Covered bus stops 5 0 0 Bench 10 0 0 Amenities Well-lit stop that provides a sense of security 5 0 0 Trash cans 2 0 0 Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 0 0 Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 5 0 0 Accommodations Bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop 5 0 0 No Transit Stoo Located Within 1/2 Mlle Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment Area governed by an adopted mM ordinance that will 60 0 0 Available Mobility promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes Services On demand rideshare services available 60 0 0 Se1ment within FLEX service area 60 0 0 ., -·-:, , ,. · .. ,,. Total SCore: 57 57 ~ Transit LOS: E E TRANSIT • Transit stop amenities available: Do the sidewalks or path to the transit stop appear to be ADA compliant? Do multiple transit routes stop on the study segment? Do any of the routes provide a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility hub? Do any of the routes provide a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub? • Closest distance to exlstlnc transit stop: Is there commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods? On weekends, are the headways no more than 1 hour headways between 9 am-5 pm? Is there bike parking available at the bus stop? .,,,..,.,.....,. Is the bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop? • Is area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes? YINFO lo a Ai o oad El Ca i o R el s Drive A ri 5 ,20 0 Bench 0 Trash Cans 0 Covered Bus Stop 0 Well-lit Stops □ Stop located within a block of commercial users Yes No Yes Yes 1/4 to 1/2 mile walk to bus only on s 1 hour No No 0 0 No WB SCORE I LOS 69 ID 0 Bench 0 Trash Cans 0 Covered Bus Stop 0 Well-lit Stops D Stop located within a block of commercial users Yes No Yes Yes 1/4 to 1/2 mile walk to bus only on es t 1 hour No No N No No I Project: Raceway Industrial Segment: Palomar Airport Road From El Camino Real To S. Melrose Drive Scenario: Existing with Improvements By: __________________________________ ==== Transit & Ridesharing MMLOS Criteria EB WB Criteria Points Points Assigned Points Assigned Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment 50 (rail/bus) 0 0 No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 30 (bus) 30 (rail/bus) 20 20 No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 20 (bus) Access No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest transit stop 5 0 0 ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both 15 15 15 directions Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 0 0 Route provides a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility 15 15 15 Connectivity hub Route provides for a single transfer to reach a COASTER 5 5 5 station or mobility hub Transit priority Dedicated ri11ht of way 5 0 0 Transit priority during peak hours 5 0 0 Headways of-15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 15 0 0 on weekdays Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 5 0 0 on weekdays Service Headways of 1 hour between 6:3o-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on 2 2 2 weekdays Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and 10 0 0 afternoon commute periods No more than 1 hour headways between 9 am and 5 pm on 5 0 0 weekends Covered bus stops 5 0 0 Bench 10 10 10 Amenities Well-lit stop t hat provides a sense of security 5 0 0 Trash cans 2 2 2 Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 0 0 Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 5 0 0 Accommodations Bus stop w ithin 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop 5 0 0 No Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment Area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will 60 0 0 Available Mobility promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes Services On demand rideshare services available 60 0 0 Se11ment within FLEX service area 60 0 0 . ~ ·,· .. ·: Total 5cot9: 69 69 ' . Transit LOS: D D , TRANSIT • Transit stop amenities available: Do the sidewalks or path to the transit stop appear to be ADA compliant? Do multiple transit routes stop on the study segment? Do any of the routes provide a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility hub 7 Do any of the routes provide a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub? • Closest distance to existinc transit stop: What type of transit Headways between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays: Is there commute shuttle service provided during the mominc and afternoon commute periods? On weekends, are the headways no more than 1 hour headways between 9 am-5 pm 7 Is there bike partdnc available at the bus stop 7 Is the bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop? • Is area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will promote ridesharinc and/ or the use of non-auto modes 7 YINFO Palo a i o oad S. el s ive 0 Bench 0 Trash Cans 0 Covered Bus Stop D Well-lit Stops D Stop located within a block of commercial users Yes No Yes Yes 1/4 to 1/2 mile walk to bus only o r s 1 hour No No No WB SCORE I LOS 69 ID 0 Bench 0 Trash Cans 0 Covered Bus Stop D Well-lit Stops D Stop located within a block of commercial users Yes No Yes Yes 1/4 to 1/2 mile walk to bus only presen 1 hour No No 0 0 No Project: Raceway Industrial Segment: Palomar Airport Road From S. Melrose Drive To Eagle Drive Scenario: Existing+ Improvements By: _____________________________________ _ Transit & Ridesharing MMLOS Criteria EB WB Criteria Points Points Assigned Points Assicned Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mlle Walk from Subiect Site or Roadway Segment 50 (rail/bus) 0 0 No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 30 (bus) 30 (rail/bus) 20 20 No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 20 (bus) Access No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest transit stop s 0 0 ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both 1S 15 15 directions Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 0 0 Route provides a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility 15 15 15 Connectivity hub Route provides for a single transfer to reach a COASTER s station or mobility hub 5 5 Transit priority Dedicated right of way 5 0 0 Transit priority during peak hours 5 0 0 Headways of-15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm 15 on weekdays 0 0 Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays 5 0 0 Service Headways of 1 hour between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on 2 2 2 weekdays Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and 10 afternoon commute periods 0 0 No more t han 1 hour headways between 9 am and 5 pm on 5 0 0 weekends Covered bus stops 5 0 0 Bench 10 10 10 Amenities Well-lit stop that provides a sense of security 5 0 0 Trash cans 2 2 2 Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 0 0 Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 5 0 0 Accommodations Bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop 5 0 0 No Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment Area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will 60 0 0 Available Mobility promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes Services On demand rideshare services available 60 0 0 Segment within FLEX service area 60 0 0 I:' I • ... ·" ~.-. .· ... Tol:IIISCON: 69 69 , .. . Transit LOS: D D