HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-12-07; Planning Commission; ; CUP 00-36X1A - AT&T LA COSTA RESIDENCE WCFThe City of Carlsbad Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Conditional Use Permit Amendment
P.C. AGENDA OF: December 7, 2011
ltemNo. G)
Application complete date: October 3, 2011
Project Planner: Dan Halverson
Project Engineer: David Rick
SUBJECT: CUP 00-36xl{A) -AT&T LA COSTA RESIDENCE WCF -Request for an
amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 00-36xl to allow for the addition
of three (3) additional new panel antennas, a new GPS antenna, and two (2) new
equipment cabinets to an existing unmanned Wireless Communications Facility
(WCF) consisting of a 240 square foot at grade equipment room and six (6) panel
antennas mounted within two expanded chimney structures and one faux chimney
located on a single family dwelling unit at 7512 Cadencia Street and in Local
Facilities Management Zone 6.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6851
APPROVING an amendment to CUP 00-36xl based upon the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
This proposed amendment to CUP 00-36x 1 will allow the addition of three (3) additional new
panel antennas, one new GPS antenna, and two (2) new equipment cabinets to an unmanned
Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of a 240 square foot at grade equipment
room and six ( 6) existing panel antennas mounted within two expanded chimney structures and
one faux chimney located on a single family dwelling unit at 7512 Cadencia Street.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
On May 16, 2001, CUP 00-36 was denied by the Planning Commission based on neighborhood
opposition to the proposed use. The applicant filed a timely appeal to the City Council and on
October 16, 2001, the City Council upheld the denial of CUP 00-36. AT&T commenced
litigation in November 2001 in the Federal District Court in San Diego challenging the City
Council's denial. The City Council denial was overturned. As a result, on December 9, 2003,
the City Council adopted City Council (CC) Resolution No. 2003-325 approving CUP 00-36
based upon the court order.
On July 15, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended approval to extend the permit
retroactively from January 17, 2009 to January 16, 2019. Whereas the City Council
subsequently on September 15, 2009 approved the extension of CUP 00-36.
CUP 00-36x 1 (A) -AT&T LA COSTA RESIDENCE WCF
December 7, 2011
Pae 2
The applicant (AT&T) is requesting to amend CUP 00-36xl to allow for the addition of three (3)
additional new panel antennas, one new GPS antenna, and two (2) new equipment cabinets to an
existing unmanned Wireless Communication Facility consisting of an existing 240 square foot at
grade equipment room and six (6) existing panel antennas measuring 4'6" in height within two
expanded chimney structures and one faux chimney located on this residence. The proposed
panel antennas are comparable in size (4'6"x 6") to the existing panel antennas (4'6" x 5") and
one new antenna is proposed to be located in each of the existing three chimneys. A new small
OPS antenna will also be included in the equipment enclosure.
Currently, the existing 1.07 acre hillside site is developed with a single family residence. The
residence is three levels as seen from Cadencia Street and is setback from the street
approximately 100 feet. The two operational chimneys have been expanded and house five
antennas (three in one chimney and two in the other) while the faux chimney has one antenna.
The antennas are screened within the chimneys and cannot be seen from public views. The
equipment room is located adjacent to and right of the 400 square foot garage.
The WCF is located in a P-C "residential" zone. Residential zones are considered "discouraged
locations" under the City Council Policy #64 Guidelines. However, WCFs may be located in
"discouraged locations" if the applicant demonstrates that no feasible alternative site exists
within a preferred location. The applicant has submitted coverage maps indicating the coverage
needs for this facility (see Attachment 8). The areas requiring coverage are residential. The
applicant has demonstrated that there are no other properties within the vicinity that have a non-
residential land use designation and are at a high enough elevation to meet the required WCF
coverage objectives as the existing site.
The design guidelines of City Council Policy # 64 require that all aspects of a WCF, including
the supports, antennas, screening methods, and equipment should exhibit "stealth" design
techniques so they visually blend into the background or the surface onto which they are
mounted. The policy encourages collocation wherever feasible and appropriate. Consistent with
this, the proposed antennas and equipment will be collocated on the existing residence. The
project complies with the policy design guidelines in that the facility is a "stealth" design.
Specifically, the existing as well as proposed panel antennas are located within two expanded
chimneys and one faux chimney. The WCF existing and proposed equipment is located within a
240 square foot room that was built adjoining the 400 square foot garage.
The applicant submitted an RF emissions report to ensure that the RF emissions will not exceed
the FCC guidelines. The report indicates that the RF emissions of the existing and proposed
AT&T Wireless antennas will be well below the FCC standard for continuous public exposure.
The project complies with City Standards and all necessary findings can be made for the
approval being requested.
IV. ANALYSIS
The proposed Wireless Communication Facility continues to be consistent with all applicable
plans, policies and regulations described below:
A. The Carlsbad General Plan;
CUP 00-36xl(A)-AT&T LA COSTA RESIDENCE WCF
December 7, 2011
Pae 3
B. Planned Community (P-C) Zone (Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) and
The La Costa Master Plan (MP 149);
C. Conditional Use Permit Regulations (Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code);
D. City Council Policy Statement: Policy# 64-Wireless Communication Facilities; and
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and Zone 6
Local Facilities Management Plan.
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of
the above regulations is discussed in the sections below.
A. The City of Carlsbad General Plan
The project complies with the General Plan in that, the use is necessary and desirable for the
development of the community because of the benefit and demand for digital communications
and data transmissions for businesses, individuals, public agencies and emergency service
systems in this part of the city. The use is consistent with the General Plan in that the Residential
Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan Land Use designation does not preclude the
provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) uses. Additionally, the proposed antennas
will be screened inside the existing chimneys and the equipment in the existing equipment room.
Therefore, the project's stealth design complies with the General Plan objectives that seek to
maintain and enhance Carlsbad's appearance.
B. Planned Community (P-C) Zone (Chapter 21.38 of the C.M.C) and The La Costa
Master Plan (MP 149)
In the P-C Zone, the permitted uses and structures shall be established by a master plan of
development approved in accordance with Chapter 21.38 of the C.M.C. The master plan may
include any use found to be necessary and desirable for a community plan. The La Costa Master
Plan does not preclude the provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) uses and the
proposed antennas will be screened inside the existing chimneys and the equipment in the
existing equipment room.
The existing WCF antennas are located within the .two operational chimneys and one faux
chimney and are not within any of the required front, rear or side yard setbacks. The two (2)
new equipment cabinets will be located within the existing equipment room and also meet all
development .standards of the La Costa Master Plan. The required CUP findings ( discussed
below in Section C) can be made for the proposed WCF as it is a desirable public convenience
and is compatible with its surroundings.
C. Conditional Use Permit Regulations (Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code)
Conditional uses, such as WCFs possess unique and special characteristics that make it
impractical to include them as permitted uses "by right" in any of the various zoning
classifications (i.e. residential, commercial, office, industrial). The authority for the location and
operation of these uses is subject to Planning Commission review and the issuance of
Conditional Use Permits. Staff has reviewed the proposed project and found that all the
CUP 00-36x 1 (A) -AT&T LA COST A RESIDENCE WCF
December 7, 2011
Pae 4
necessary finding can be made to approve the CUP Amendment. The required findings and
satisfaction of these findings are discussed below in Table A.
TABLE A -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
FINDINGS
That the requested use is necessary or desirable
for the development of the community, and is
in harmony with the various elements and
objectives of the general plan, including, if
applicable, the certified local coastal program,
specific plan or master plan.
That the requested use is not detrimental to
existing uses or to uses specifically permitted
in the zone in which the proposed use is to be
located.
PROJECT CONSISTENCY
The requested amended WCF use is necessary
and desirable for the development of the
community because of the benefit and demand
for digital communications and data
transmissions for businesses, individuals,
public agencies and emergency service systems
in this part of the city. The use is consistent
with the General Plan in that the Residential
Low-Medium Density (RLM) General Plan
Land Use designation does not preclude the
provision of Wireless Communication Facility
(WCF) uses. Additionally, the proposed
antennas are the same size and shape as the
existing antennas and will be screened within
two operational chimneys and one faux
chimney. The new equipment cabinets will be
located in the existing equipment room that is
designed to match the existing residence.
Therefore, the project's stealth design complies
with the General Plan objectives that seek to
maintain and enhance Carlsbad's appearance.
The requested addition to the existing WCF to
locate three new antennas within three
chimneys and two new equipment cabinets
within an existing equipment shelter is not
detrimental to existing uses, or to uses
permitted in the zone in that the amended
project is stealth in design and the WCF use is
not precluded by the project site's P-C Zoning
or La Costa Master Plan. Furthermore, the
placement of additional antennas within the
two operational chimneys and one faux
chimney and two (2) new equipment cabinets
in the existing equipment room will not result
in any additional building coverage, does not
visually impact the existing site, and the WCF
does not interfere with other surrounding uses.
The project also complies with the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) Radio
Frequency (RF) Exposure Guidelines.
CUP 00-36x 1 (A) -AT&T LA COSTA RESIDENCE WCF
December 7, 2011
Pae 5
TABLE A -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS CONTINUED
FINDINGS
That the site for the proposed conditional use is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading
facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in this code
and required by the Planning Director,
Planning Commission or City Council, in order
to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
That the street system serving the proposed use
is adequate to properly handle all traffic
generated by the proposed use.
PROJECT CONSISTENCY
The site for the proposed conditional use is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading
facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in this code in
that the existing chimneys which the proposed
antennas are to be located in are not within any
of the required front, rear or side yard setbacks.
The two (2) equipment cabinets located within
the existing equipment room also meets all
development standards.
The unmanned WCF use requires, on average,
only monthly maintenance visits and
occasional visits in response to operational
problems. The existing street system is
adequate to properly handle any traffic
generated by the use.
D. Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (City Council Policy 64)
The City Council adopted a policy (Policy # 64) regarding prioritization for the location of
Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) within the City on October 3, 2001 (Last revised July
14, 2009). The guidelines state that WCFs should be located on buildings and structures, not on
vacant land. In addition, preferred locations of WCFs, in order of priority, are industrial,
commercial, public, other non-residential, public utility, park, or community facility property.
The WCF is located in a P-C "residential" zone. Residential zones are considered "discouraged
locations" under the City Council Policy #64 Guidelines. However, WCFs may be located in
"discouraged locations" if the applicant demonstrates that no feasible alternative site exists
within a preferred location. The applicant has submitted coverage maps indicating the coverage
needs for this facility (see Attachment 8). The areas requiring coverage are residential. The
applicant has demonstrated that there are no other properties within the vicinity that have a non-
residential land use designation and are at a high enough elevation to meet the required WCF
coverage objectives as the existing site.
The design guidelines of City Council Policy # 64 require that all aspects of a WCF, including
the supports, antennas, screening methods, and equipment should exhibit "stealth" design
techniques so they visually blend into the background or the surface onto which they are
mounted. The policy encourages collocation wherever feasible and appropriate. Consistent with
this, the proposed antennas and equipment will be collocated on the existing residence. The
project complies with the policy design guidelines in that the facility is a "stealth" design.
Specifically, the existing as well as proposed panel antennas are located within two expanded
chimneys and one faux chimney. The WCF existing and proposed equipment is located within a
240 square foot room that was built adjoining the 400 square foot garage.
CUP 00-36x 1 (A) -AT&T LA COST A RESIDENCE WCF
December 7, 2011
Pae 6
The applicant submitted an RF emissions report to ensure that the RF emissions will not exceed
the FCC guidelines. The report, dated June 16, 2011, indicates that the RF emissions of the
existing and proposed AT&T Wireless antennas will be below the FCC standard for continuous
public exposure.
E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and
Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan.
The proposed site is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 6. The installation
of additional antennas within the existing chimneys and two (2) new equipment cabinets within
the existing equipment shelter would not result in increased public facilities demands and
therefore, the project would not exceed performance standards for public facilities.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301(e), "Additions to Existing
Structures", of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on
the environment.
• ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6851
2. Location Map
3. City Council Resolution No. 2009-229, dated September 15, 2009
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6600, dated July 15, 2009
5. City Council Resolution No. 2003-325, dated December 9, 2003
6. Disclosure Statement
7. Background Data Sheet
8. Coverage Maps
9. Reduced Exhibits
10. Full Size Exhibits "A" -"H" dated December 7, 2011
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
AT&T La Costa Residence WCF
CUP 00-36x1 (A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-229
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A RETROACTIVE TEN
YEAR EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP
00-36 TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF AN
EXISTING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
CONSISTING OF A 240 SQUARE FOOT RADIO BASE STATION
(RBS) WITHIN A 400 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE AND A TOTAL
OF SIX (6) PANEL ANTENNAS WITHIN TWO EXPANDED
CHIMNEY STRUCTURES AND ONE FAUX CHIMNEY ON
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7512 CADENCIA
STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: AT&T 7512 CADENCIA
CASE NO.: CUP 00-36X1
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on July 15, 2009, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
consider Conditional Use Permit Extension (CUP 00-36x1 ); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 15th day of
September, 2009, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider said Conditional Use Permit
Extension, and at that time received recommendations, objections, protests, comments of all
persons interested in or opposed to CUP 00-36x1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
a Conditional Use Permit Extension, is adopted and approved, and that the findings and
conditions of the Planning Commission contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No.
6600 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and
conditions of the City Council. Future extensions will be granted by the Planning Commission
as required under the Carlsbad Municipal Code and by Condition No. 4 of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 6600.
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial
Review'' shall apply:
Ill
Ill
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
govemed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking review must be filed in
the appropriate court not later than the nineteenth day following the date
on which this decision becomes final; however,· if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost or preparation of such
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is
extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the
record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attomey
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the
record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA. 92008."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the l5tb,_ day of Se!)t.adg 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
C
(SEAL)
AYES: Our.il M:ntet-s 1£wic,, &tlcbin, !Bil, Pcck;gro arl Blac:kb.n:n.
NOES: K<n=.
ABSENT: N::re.
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6600
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A RETROACTIVE TEN YEAR EXTENSION
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
CONTINUED OPERATION OF A WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 240
SQUARE FOOT RADIO BASE STATION (RBS) WITHIN A 400
SQUARE FOOT GARAGE AND SIX PANEL ANTENNAS
WITHIN TWO EXTENDED CHIMNEYS AND ONE FAUX
CHIMNEY ON THE ROOF OF AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 7512 CADENCIA
STREET IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: AT&T 7512 CADENCIA
CASE NO.: CUP 00-36xl
WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless, the "Applicant," has filed a verified application
with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Patrick and Viona L. Van Hoose,
"Owner," described as
Lot 486 of Carlsbad Tract 72-20 La Costa Vale Unit No. 3, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to Map thereof No. 7950, filed in the office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, June 3, 1974
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved CUP 00-36, on December 9, 2003, based
upon a court order; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditional Use
Permit Extension as shown on Exhibits "A" -"F" dated May 16, 2001, on file in the Planning
Department AT&T 7512 CADENCIA -CUP 00-36Xl, as provided by the conditions of
approval of CUP 00-36 and Chapter 21.42 and/or 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on July 15, 2009, hold a duly noticed
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request and make a recommendation to the
City Council; and
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Com.Iilission considered all factors
relating to the CUP Extension.
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2003, the City Council approved CUP 00-36 as
described and conditioned in City Council Resolution No. 2003-325.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF AT&T 7512 CADENCIA -
CUP 00-36xl based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
Findings:
1.
2.
3.
The adopted findings for CUP 00-36 which are contained in City Council Resolution No.
2003-325 apply to this extension and are incorporated by this reference.
That the Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects
that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the
environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the
preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301, Existing Facilities,
of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the Planning Director has
found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not
apply to this project.
That the existing Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) remains consistent
with the location and design guidelines of City Council Policy No. 64, in that
although the facility is located within the Planned Community (P-C) residential
zone, a "discouraged" location, the applicant bas demonstrated that no feasible
alternative site currently exists within a "preferred" location that can achieve
the required WCF coverage objectives as its current location. Furthermore, the
existing Wireless Communication Facility exhibits "stealth" design through
locating a 240 square foot Radio Base System (RBS) in a garage and concealing
six (6) panel antennas within two extended chimneys and Qne faux chimney.
Conditions:
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to /
PC RESO NO. 6600 -2-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
3.
4.
5.
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the
property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said
conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer
or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Conditional Use Permit
Extension.
All conditions of approval imposed upon Conditional Use Permit CUP 00-36 as stated in
City Council Resolution No. 2003-325 shall apply as conditions of approval for CUP 00-
36x 1 and are incorporated by this reference, except Planning ·Conditions No. 6, 8, 9, 11
and 14, which have been satisfied and Planning Condition No. 7, which is
superseded by Condition No. 4 below. Conditions of approval No. 3, 5, 6 and 7
below are new conditions.
This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis
to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have
a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare.
If the Planning Director determines that the use has such substantial negative effects, the
Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the
permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the
substantial negative effects.
This Conditional Use Permit Extension is granted r-etroactively for a period of ten years
from January 17, 2009 through January 16, 2019. This permit may be revoked at any
time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect
on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed
herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time
not to exceed ten years upon written application of the permittee made no less than
90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such
extension, unless it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land
uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding
land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or
granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There
is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant.
All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds,
trash, and debris.
6. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the
real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County
Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested
parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Conditional Use
Permit Extension by Resolution No. 6600 on the property. Said Notice of Restriction
shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details
and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for
inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute
and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest. If a Notice of
PC RESONO. 6600 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Restriction is not recorded by October 15, 2009, this approval shall become null and
void.
Engineering:
7. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include
but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent
silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and
educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or
devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to storrnwater, receiving water or
stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. .. Developer shall
notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectiv~ly referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code ·section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading, or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise
expired.
PC RESO NO. 6600 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of
the City of Carlsbad, California, held on July 15, 2009 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
DONNED
Planning Director
PC RESO NO. 6600
Commissioners Baker, Boddy, Dominguez, Douglas, L'Heureux,
Nygaard, and Chairperson Montgomery
-5-10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 1~, 13 lg;! 14
a:5s.~ 15 i ~ I :J ~ z ..J tS 16 g~I
< ~-' 17 ~ ~ ~ 0
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-325
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW AT&T
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A
TOTAL OF 6 PANEL ANTENNAS IN TWO EXPANDED
CHIMNEYS AND ONE NEW CHIMNEY AND
INSTALLATION OF A 240 SQUARE FOOT RADIO BASE
STATION WITHIN A NEW 400 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE
LOCATED AT 7512 CADENCIA STREET IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6.
CASE NAME: AT&T WIRELESS-7512 CADENCIA
CASE NO.: CUP 00-36
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does hereby resolve as
WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless Services, "Developer," has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Patrick and Vionna
Van Hoose, NOwner," described as
Lot 486 Of Carlsbad Tract 72-20 of La Costa Vale Unit No. 3,
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map thereof No. 7950, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
(''the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the real property owner has signed the appropriate
application and disclosure statement giving consent to applicant to locate its cellular
facilities on the residential property; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a
Conditional Use Permit as shown on Exhibits NA" -NF" dated May .16, 2001, on file in the
Carlsbad Planning Department, AT&T WIRELESS -7512 CADENCIA CUP 00-36, as
provided by Chapter 21.42 and 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
C ~~, ~ !s I
~
Uw ~ ~ :$
a: 6 > ~ ~ '~ 5 ~ ~ Ill ~ ~ • Ou~ ~~~ ~ ~ !.i 0 u
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law on May 16, 2001, to consider said verified application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a duly notice public
hearing as prescribed by law on June 20, 2001 to approve City Council Resolution No.
5006 denying the Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the application of AT&T Wireless Services for a Conditional
Use Permit was unanimously denied by the City Council on June 20, 2001; and
WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless Services filed a notice of appeal on July 2,
2001 appealing the Planning Commission's decision of June 20, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the matter was docketed for an appeal hearing in the manner
prescribed by law and. that appeal hearing was continued for reasons explained to the
appellant and took place on August 21, 2001 in which the CouncJI received the staff
report, evidence, arguments and testimony from all persons interested in the matter,
and
WHEREAS, the Council continued the hearing for the limited purposes of
accepting new evidence on the impacts of an existing cellular facility within two lots of
the proposed facility; and
WHEREAS, the continued public hearing date of September 11, 2001 was
cancelled due to the tragedies in New York City and Washington, O.C.; and
WHEREAS, the continued hearing was held on September 18, 2001 and
the public hearing was reopened for the limited purpose of admitting the new evidence
requested previously and allowing arguments and testimony on the new evidence by all
persons interested therein; and
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
i~f 13 i ls ! ~ w en 14 ~~,(
ct ~ > ~ 15 i~i~ t~~ a:za:. 16 a: ,c i Ou ~8~ 17 ~ N a: -t5 0
18
19
20
21
22
2~
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the City Council denied the appeal without prejudice and
directed the City Attorney to return with documents memorializing that decision; and
WHEREAS, the applicant initiated litigation in the Federal District Court to
overturn the City Council's denial of its CUP application; and
WHEREAS, Judge Jeffrey T. Miller, United States District Judge of the
United States District Court for the Southern District of California (Case No. 01 CV 2045
JM (LAB)) granted the application of AT&T Wireless and ordered the City Council's
denial of the CUP to be set aside; and
WHEREAS, Judge Miller entered his order granting judgment in
favor of AT&T Wireless and ordering the City Council to grant the CUP within ten days
of this judgment of November 25, 2003; and
WHEREAS, this matter was previously noticed and a public hearing held
on AT&T Wireless's application for cellular facilities at Tower 173 which was for the
consideration of an alternative to the facilities proposed at 7512 Cadencia Street and
the notification of that hearing included residences within 600 feet of both Tower 173
and 7512 Cadencia Street,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
8. That based on the court's order of November 25, 2003, the City
Council approves AT&T Wireless -7512 Cadencia CUP 00~36, subject to the following
conditions:
Ill
Ill
3
1~, ~ a: I
j u~ ~~i
a:5s;a:
0 0 f?
..J ' < 5 ~~~ 0 Z a: . a:a::<o 0 0 < Ss~
~"'a: -< 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to building
permit issuance.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their tenns, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fall to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the
right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition
issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all
certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions
or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or
a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Conditional Use Permit.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all
corrections and modifications to the Conditional Use Permit documents, as
necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final
action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the
approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval, shall
require an amendment to this approval.
3. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and
local laws·and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law
on this Project are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
5. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect,
defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers,
employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities,
losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court .costs and
attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's
approval and issuance of this Conditional Use Permit, (b) City's approval or
issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in
connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's
installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without
limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions.
4
1 6. The Developer shall submit to the Planning Department a reproducible 24" x 35•,
mylar copy of the site plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision
2 making body.
3 7. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of 5 years from its effective
4 date._ This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing; if it is found
that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and
5 the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been
met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed
6 5 years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior
to the expiration date. The City Council may not grant such extension, unless it
7 finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or
8
the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding
land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be
9 denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce
such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the City
10 Council may grant.
11 8. The existing access gate on Cadencia Street shall be relocated to 20 feet behind
12 the front property line. The access gate must be positioned to allow enough
Q space for a vehicle to idle outside of the public right-of-way while waiting for the
1~1 13 gate to open. All landscaping disturbed as a result of the gate relocation shall be .... -, replaced and installed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director prior to building er:~
.... ~ l&J 14 permit sign off. ~ II.. 0
0~$
ct 5 > ~ 15 9. Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Carlsbad Unified School ~ 'IC:::; >-cc District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. ~ ~ ..J (.) 16 cr 15 cr:o
I= ~ i& 10. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are cc ~ ..J 17 J'::~~ required as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any c3 t.)
18 amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits,
including, but not limited to the following:
19
20 11. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency
providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to
21 the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are
available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and
22 that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the
23
time of occupancy.
24 12. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a
yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that
25 the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or
the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use
26 has such substantial negative effects, the Planning Director shall recommend
27
28
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
iwl 13 ~ ~ '7
~om .., u w 14 .., LI. C) jaOjS
. ~.., ~z a: u > 15 ~ 'i-~ii~ 16 ~ u ia
,(~~ 17 ~-~ G
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that the City Council, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard,
add additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the substantial negative effects.
13. The Developer/Operator shall comply with ANSI/IEEE standards for EMF
emissions. Within six (6) months after the issuance of occupancy, the
Developer/Operator shall submit a project implementation report which provides
cumulative field measurements of radio frequency (EMF) power densities of all
antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the EMF
emissions and compare the results with currently accepted ANSI/IEEE
standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director for consistency with the Project's preliminary proposal report and the
accepted ANSI/IEEE standards. If on review, the City finds that the Project does
not meet ANSI/IEEE standards, the City may revoke or modify this conditional
use permit.
14. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office
of the County Recorder, subject to the · satisfaction of the Planning Director,
notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Car1sbad
has issued a Conditional Use Permit by Resolution No. 2003-325 on the
real property owned by the Patrick and Vienna· Van Hoose. Said Notice of
Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing
complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions
or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning
Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice
which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the
Developer or successor in interest.
C. This Resolution shall take effect 35 days after the Notice of Exemption is
posted by the County Clerk pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. This
Resolution supersedes City Council Resolution No. 2001-309.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees,
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for
convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these
fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in
Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required
information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal
Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent
legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
i~I 13 ~ :!: -
.J ~ ~ s 14 ~~~~ a:~s!~ j6~i 15
a: z a: • 16 a: ~ 0 ss~ 17 ~~~ 0 u
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified
fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity
charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service
fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of
which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the
statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 9th day of
December
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
2003 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Hall and Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
• Al J • ~
7
(
DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT
P-1(A}
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
1.
2.
P-1(A)
APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership.
include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person.___________ Corp/Part ~1° t:C Moo1l,T~
Title.___________ Title. ____________ _
Address._________ Address 4S7'5-S r&-,f\(,., (JM'DrAl 1>Wµ
OWNER (Not the owner's agent) ~ v\61,o I e,A C\ "2,.\ Z.,.\
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of. the legal
ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person l«::a,0a. \/16tJ..St\ Vaj \:«Q(E.
\ Title. __________ _
Address 1iilZ. CA\£~ c,,A 6!.
CA p..lhf>ft)) f c.-A g 1..C()O{
Corp/Part. ___________ _
Title. _____________ _
Address. ___________ _
Page 1 of2 Revised 07/10
( (
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of~ person serving as an officer or director of the non-
profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profrt/Trust.________ Non Profrt/Trust. _________ _
Title____________ Title ____________ _
Address _________ _ Address ___________ _
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
D Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
Print or type name of owner . • . Print or type name of applicant
licabl.e/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
P-1(A) Page2 of2 Revised 07110
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: CUP 00-36xl(A)
CASE NAME: AT&T La Costa Residence WCF
APPLICANT: AT&T Wireless ----------------------------
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A request for an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to
allow for the addition of three (3) additional panel antennas, one new GPS antenna, and two (2)
new equipment cabinets to an existing unmanned WCF consisting of a 240 square foot
equipment room and six existing panel antennas mounted within two expanded chimneys and
one faux chimney structure on property located on a single family dwelling unit at 7512
Cadencia Street, in the P-C Zone, in Local Facilities Management Zone 6.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 486 of Carlsbad Tract 72-20 La Costa Vale Unit No. 3, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map Thereof No. 7950,
filed in the Office of County Recorder of San Diego County, June 3, 1974.
APN: 223-260-08 Acres: NIA Proposed No. of Lots/Units:N "-:.:..;I A=-=---------
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Existing Land Use Designation: =-P=lann=e-=d=-=In=d=u=st=ri=a=-1--=R=L=M-=----------------
Proposed Land Use Designation:N "-"""'I A=-=---------------------
Density Allowed:N '°-C...CI Ac...c,_ _____ _ Density Proposed: "-N~I A=-=-----------
Existing Zone: Planned Community -P-C Proposed Zone:N "-"--'I A=-=------------
Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use:
Zoning General Plan Current Land Use
Site P-C RLM SFR
North P-C RLM SFR
South P-C RLM SFR
East P-C RLM SFR
West P-C RLM SFR
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
Coastal Zone: D Yes C8J No Local Coastal Program Segment: _N~I A _______ _
Within Appeal Jurisdiction: D Yes C8J No Coastal Development Permit: D Yes C8J No
Local Coastal Program Amendment: D Yes C8J No
Existing LCP Land Use Designation: NIA
Existing LCP Zone: NI A
Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: _N_I A __ _
Proposed LCP Zone:N __ IA ________ _
Revised O 1/06
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad ==-=-=-==----
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity):N -~/A ________________ _
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
~ Categorical Exemption, Section 15301(e), "Existing Facilities"
D Negative Declaration, issued ____________________ _
D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _
D Other, ___________________________ _
Revised O 1 /06
S00157
La Costa
7512 Cadencl Carlsbad CA a Street ' 92009
2 23-260-08-00
With Proposed C overage
S00157
La Costa
7512 Cadencia Street
Carlsbad, CA 92009
223-260-08-00
With Existing Coverage
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
VICINITY MAP
~ I I I ........ • ~ ~ •
i ......... , I t
/" • t ..,..,,.., tl""''m
~ \JI Casie.., c.q,~
11,
\ .,... ... .. \ ~ ✓ ,.,,o., t.-,•St \ _ ..
"""'<, ..
f i iff
I ... "
Lr.-anNSt ~
\ rR
~
4
,,,..
,.i'
C.
s
"---~ Si.. \; S d 14 _;:::✓
at&t
LACOSTA
7512 CADENCIA STREET
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009
SD-157 LTE OPTIMAL
CONSUL TANT TEAM
CI.IENTI REPflESENTATIVE: -·-11111 'MU.OW C11111C IIOitO
_.. JtG
ltlllOII.OO,~UUt
~ (ttl) 171-0iN CDNNTI CMIIM.M,IMKII
AlleHFTECT: .,,., ... _.
llftlJDM&MNIA -... NIWll'CIIIT ll,t04, IW,,lf'QMM ...
-(lff)710---(Ml) HO-INI ---IIIIE ACQUISlTIOH: ... __
11,0, IOI" It
HIIWt't, ~-1♦ ..._.. ('1tO)IM-tt04
... (llO)----ZONING:
...--1',0, IOI If ~.~HON
.... (IM)lff◄t• ""' "' ---
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
--
one.,...,...,_,... --------bllfM Ml fl~
,,.._MlorOCIMlftllUffllM -----
,.,.,_
,,,. l'lllCWIC COffllt ~ -n..oO't 1Nf0lf00,Clll.POIIMH111
..
.. , .. 1111t..ot-o11 ,_,
U U, NII IMU'I _,.. ........ ... •·• """-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ~-M.-=.......,.... TO MCIOIN IM D!ITIHCI ffl, ffC ICON: ffl CClliNT
• MV4I. (I) (N) '-1'1 MDODII _,....,,. NIHIII,
• INlw.L (J) (H) •• N,. ~'
•MUiU.(t)(N)llflifl.
• 11111YN.L (1) (H) DO NIOI ~
•MTH.L(l)(N)Ol'IMfflNlrif,,
•INIRIU.(l}(H)ll¥.'I.
SCALE
SHEET INDEX
r~, mu:IIC!f ... ""'""" .... , ... , .... ti·' ....
APPLICABLE CODES
!HM I\OlfO,OOlrf\.lGT,MIIIOIT ~OOOl'"'1M. ~
ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER
lll l'l"lli-' 41."m"~ "'"""
RF INFORMATION
GSM LIMT8 LTE
'" -114,I MHa
1'll HO -Nt.4 MHI .,.,. -,,. .. .... 704 .. 711 MHt 1HO • 11&2.a WHI 1l4t .. 1IIO ""' 1170 -!NO Wta
124 .. 121.4 ._...
Rx r.fc, : m2~a ~-IZl,I -Dt-.-4 MHa 1•-tNl.t MHI 1.14 .. 741 ""' 1NO -1t00 -MAXERP:I MO t.lH11 1H WATTS
IOO '°'"' ttoo WHI: IK,1 WATTS
JR...A. .,,,.,_ ......... -·-5.'=''la--=
_ ...
......,
~at&t
151a M:ft: CINT'DI IOI.U\W ......... .... OIIOO. ~ .,.,
-
""-
""-u. COSTA --SO-I &7 LTE OPTIMAL
Jl!IMIINOi41TMSf ---
"'mmu
TITLE IHHT
T-1
sm; fW KEYNOTES
*
(t)AT«rw«_ID....._I/A-0.
w--
w-.
--~--~-!!!t,..,. ----1· L// L£J·.y·
~~IJ£ / I ; ,-/
-f ' :
< -'"
sm: "1.f:N °'ffl NOTIS
\ 1:
\ \\; I !1• I itl ':
N
EB
I, =~.JUL(~l1ciif:l&ff>I.OOITI""
'·:!il,'~'l,'l\!t";t:/ft-'°!tl--
~~-n
~ffl"ccll:lfh•...:::=,r~ n'l,'lll',.,,"'ft..:',. ..
:.a-~OOlffla.---llW..tllrHff,..._WGIIICINGOllrllllATM.L
~~.:-,-,,....£.~--•
t..lll.~~£:T'P'J'! !lffl!. -
..:=:lin"Mlr'
,1;,, '='°"...:.=
• lll.&''&Fi!M.",~ -., !ti
• fl&t•~-.. (I) '""
SITE PLAN ~~;;,;;:-"°:;;..' -1 o~· 2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN
N
ffi
JR...A. --·---·-Fi='lia-=
_,..
.._,;
~at&t
17MM:f'ICICDMRIIOUI.I\WIO ........ MN oao, ~ tl11f
-
,.._ ----I.A COSTA --ID-117 LT& Ol'TIMAL
flllMICNCilillllll!' MIN),~ ...
"""'ffl\l
SITE I ROOr ,u.NS
A-0
NOT USED 2
EXISTING EOUIPll£NT Pl.AN KEYNOTES
1(1).,,. ,r-1·,..--v-....,.._,_,
(l)ift1'~IIDI.MD-MWOflOI.INDMN-,.
~-.,,,.--
(l)ATlitll.lOTMW.PMEI.,
(l)ATft'TllLQO~
EXISTING EQUIPMENT PLAN
ill).,., ___ ,
«)ATIITaotUIIITl..w,n~.
(l)CKMit.MI.MIClRMTa.
......
JR.A. ............ _ .. -·-1:FliH-=
-
_,..
~ ~at&t
.,._ --..,._
I.A COSTA --SD-157 LTI Ol'TIMAI.
ftll~t,WIIT ---
-mu
EXIITINO EQUtl'MINT PW
A-0.1
NOT USED NONI: 3
NOT USED 2
Pl!OPOSEO EOUIPM£1/T PIAN KffllOTES
l(l)ATl/flt ... ,IO' .. •---•
(I).., lliLI. MOI.W'IID .. MIMfO ... I'll! (MINI).
ea.~-.... --
(l)AT•T~l'NCL
(l)«ra'Tn:u:o~
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PLAN
l(l)ATl/f!IW)--.
(rJ ATf/r _,. UWl'J toJllllltaff caHf,
U' J'Mll'\,~ ~ ,.
fr/~---...
00 ~v--.........
11• .. ,·
i fll~.ma.~
(l)!HIMI.NrDG.
(IJctMLNACCaltffll.
1/2'■1'-0"
JR.A. ....,_1_ .... -·-tFlilr'
~at&t
11•~CCN'DllklULt"»D ....... liV( OCOO, ~ •111
-
--.,._
U. COSTA --S0-107 LTI OPTIMAL n,a...,..nm ---
,....mu
A-1
£1.lVAT!ON KEYNOTES
m E]
EAST ELEVATION
£LE\IATIDN KE'l'NOTE!I
,;
WEST ELEVATION
JR.A
11111,r-•---·-1:Fii&..:
_,..
~ ~at&t
11,JIM:IACCllfflll!IIOUI.IYMD ""n.a tN4 DIRIO, ~ tl11!
-
.,,_ --..,_
I.A COSTA --SD-167 m om,w.
n,10--.lffllllt ---
illl' ' '
IMU!TIIII
!UVATIONS
A-2
El.tVATION KEYNOTES
NORTH ELEVATION
El.tVATION K£YNOTES
l(C)-
~A"!ll"IIO'M''•""•'"'-
11&8~"' .....
('C)Mtfllt'1M,IITtAJi,
CH)AtttrDNMJl'fr#f,
SOUTH ELEVATION
-----·--·~ ~-=~---
rn
JR.A. --·----·-~--·
__ ,..
~ ~at&t
&71tPJrCft:;CIIHTIR~ ........ SNtDa0..~11111
---.,,_ --.,,_
LA COSTA
10-157 LTl OPTIMAL
Jllil~tnlll'f" -----&'ll! ~,,,
.-mu
lUVATION$
A-2.1
ll.MCX~COLOft. UQMTOM'I'
Dff«ldlOHS,HwNI (10,R-WIIUt"d,JO")
WIIQMT, Wffli" tW:-MOYN110 8'MCKl1I: II ..
--·-"""----IIOI: , ..... ll'ldl, C.•fl NIA Iba
TOP VIEW
f"RONT VIEW
SIDE VIEW
NOT USED 5 DC SURGE SUPPRESSION CABINET
RRU PLAN 4 ANTENNA PLAN VIEW
fltlU QOI.Ofl: UCHTOIIAY
OMOllfCNI. ~ (,1"•17.1"111,1.,
tl'f!OWJ, lfflt "l!-MOl.iMTU) 1MCICffll II IN
'MN) LO.tia, NIOHf.....,,,.~
I« 14tJ ¥, Cll•h N/A 11M
COIMCf'ORl.(4)1/IOlltiFIAMl.t
TOP VIEW
F'RONT VIEW
SIOE VIEW
3 RRU CABINET
f',\4' .. 'f"AT~~'l'OICMntoAIJll:lalllU-
~-ii---+-(f.) 4'•rMat MMNNl'l'O. IHlfflDAI.._..,
i:1 ~1;,..~T I.ff~~
(t)4'•1"mtT~l"OtrN'MNIMNID.
2
N
EB
1
JR.A. ......... mr. ... -·-is=''IH,A
_ ...
~at&t
,,. ~ «MIit ICU.l'IIMD ,,.,_
IN40Jt00,0U'GIIMl;tl111
---
--.,._
LA COSTA --SD-117 LTl OPTIMAi.
,.,.~mlaT -----;t".,JD.l.11'•!... ,...;;,;a llilliol,l'(NI
ANTENNA DITW
A-3
----DMNIIONI, "-Ml UOOliPIMQfflm (4'1"111"-I")
WDOtff, WITH l'M:•t.10\JNl'C wat.ffi: ....
-""°'-1IDt 4t ""'· C.,.1,0 (M}. ... _, (t) ,1,1 Oflol fltwtl
-I"
i \! I
~' w --
~;"-~-~;:·1 lr;-rl
(E) ANTENNA SPECIFICATION j lCAl.l: :a I MI'S
NOT USED I IIC,\U: :s I 11'11
_ .. _, .., -----·-l~bmffl (H.l"X11,t».e-, -'°""' -?/lf°'"nw.1.1
F's -F°"''"°'
~
m -,,~"l"-;m;t
~~· ~
(N) ANTENNA SPECIFICATION IICAl.ll 14 NOT USED I N'II
NOT USED IICAl.ll :3 NOT USED I N'II
!IICH.11 :2 I N'II
I IICH.l: :1 I NII
JR.A. ..... ,_ ... -·-~ .. Iii"
_ ...
~ ~at&t
PJl~CDnDIIOYI.NIII ,.,.,._
NOU0.~•111
-
..,._ --.,._
LA COS'IA --SD-157 ~Tl OPT~
7111CIGIJIIW,n&lf ~.~--
"""""'
onw
A-4