HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-03-25; Planning Commission; ; CUP 197 - KAHNAMOUISTAFF REPORT
DATE: March 25, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CUP-197 -KAHNAMOUI -Request for a conditional use permit to
allow a coin-operated arcade in an existing building located
at the southeast corner of Elm Avenue and State Street in the
C-2 zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves the interior remodeling of a real estate
office into a coin-operated arcade with pool tables, video game machines,
and air hockey machines. As shown on exhibit "A", the building in which
the use is to be located, is divided into three sections, a retail
camera shop, a glass shop, and the proposed arcade. Off street parking
for all three uses is located at the rear of the building with access
derived through an adjacent alley.
This property and surrounding parcels are located in the central business
district and in the Carlsbad Redevelopment Area. Coin-operated arcades
are permitted in C-2 zones upon the granting of a conditional use permit.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Is the requested use appropriate and desirable at this location?
2. Does the proposed project meet the required findings for a condi-
tional use permit?
I II. DISCUSSION
The proposed site for the coin-operated arcade at the southeast corner
of Elm Avenue and State Street is located in the central business dis-
trict and the downtown redevelopment area. The area immediately sur-
rounding the site is highly developed with commercial uses including a
camera shop to the west, a liquor store across Elm Avenue to the north,
a real estate office to the east, and a single family residential area
across an alley to the south. These surrounding land uses are of some
concern to staff with regard to their compatibility with an arcade.
Since the clientele of an arcade such as this most often includes a high
percentage of young people of school age, the proximity of a liquor
store and shops such as the camera shop which are closed in the evening
hours could pose potential problems. Additionally, since the arcade
would front on Elm Avenue, an extremely busy secondary arterial, problems
with young people crossing a street with a very high traffic volume
(approximately 9,400 vehicles per day) become apparent.
..
The parking area to the rear of the building is insufficient in number
of spaces (eleven required, nine provided) as well as being awkward in
design in that all vehicles must exit by backing out into the alley.
The Police Department has noted a concern that the alley itself could
become a problem by developing into an area for teenage congregation
during hours that the surrounding businesses are closed. Staff feels
that it is unreasonable to expect that any owner could completely con-
trol congregations of juveniles outside the arcade.
It appears to staff that a more appropriate location could be found for
the proposed arcade. Staff would suggest a site that is more pedestrian
oriented and where the surrounding uses would be more compatible with an
arcade.
Before a conditional use permit may be approved, it must be found that
the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the
community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and
objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses
or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use
is to be located. Staff felt that this use could be detrimental to
existing and future uses with regard to incompatibility with surrounding
commercial businesses and may present problems from a public safety
standpoint with regard to pedestrian hazards along Elm Avenue.
The proposed location for the arcade is also located within the city re-
development area. On February 22, 1981, the redevelopment committee
held a public hearing on the matter and concluded that an arcade was not
an improper use for this area, but that this particular location may not
be adequate.
Additionally, it appears that the size of the lot is insufficient to
accommodate another retail use as the offstreet parking area is two
spaces short of that required by ordinance. Because the proposed pro-
ject does not meet all the required findings for a conditional use
permit, staff cannot recommend approval.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a
significant impact on the environment and therefore issued a Negative
Declaration on March 10, 1981.
V. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1788
DENYING CUP-195, based on the findings contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1788
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Exhibits "A" and "B", dated March 6, 1981
Disclosure Forms
Environmental Documents
PK:ls 3/10/81
LOCATION MAP
~
~-------------\'I
CASE NO. CUP 1,1
APPLICANT -KAHNAMOUI --------
sUe>4~,-_
fPOF'E-P;rY
5oq e:L-M Av~.
BACKGROUND DATA SHEEl'
CASE NO: CUP-197
APPLICANT: Z. P. KAHNAMOUI
~T AND IOCATION: __ ._P_E_RM_I_T_AR_CAD __ E_IN_c_-_2_z_o_NE _____________ _
SOUTH SIDE OF-ELM BETWEEN STATE AND ROOSEVELT ··•
LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION: ALL OF LOT 10 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 480
FEET OF TRACT 106 OF CARLSBAD LANDS OF MAP 1710 FILED DECEMBER 9, 1919.
Assessors Parcel Number: 203 297 -03
Acres -----.03 No. of Lots ___ 1 ____ _
GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING
General Plan Land Use Designation ___ c_B_D ____ _
Density Allowed _________ _ Density Proposed -------
Existing Zone ____ c_-_2 ________ _ Proposed Zone ________ _
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
zoning
North
South
Fa.st
West
School District
water District
Sewer District
C-2 -----
CM -----
C-2.
CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD
land Use
RETAIL-LIQUOR STORE
RESIDENTIAL
REAL ESTATE OFFICE
RETAIL-CAMERA SHOP
POBLIC TI\CILITIF.5
.mu's N/A -------------------------
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated ___ N_o_TNE_E_D_E_D __________ _
(Other: -------~--------------------..:>
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSFSSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued ----xx March 10, 1981 Log No. ______ _
E.I.R. Certified, dated ---------------
Other,---------------------------------
...
. a
If ofter the inform,1tion you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
that further information is required, you will bc·so advised.
APPLICl\tlT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS::
Nall\C (iudividual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndica.tion} _
E l/J1
Blusioiess Address
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
".l'elcphone Number
Name C!ndividual, partner, joint
·venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Nuw.ber
Name
E'.lsiness_ Addre:is
Telephone Number
Home Address-
Telephone Number
UOJlle Address
Telephone Number
(Attach JDOrc sheets if necessary)
.... ·
I/We dcc]arc under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure :is true and correct and that it wiil remain true and correct and may be
relied. ~f~:>n as being true and correct until amended. .-
,7:_v=-/4-.. ~./ . ~?r,f-~rr~~,,_
. BY __ _,.....__'-------,-----------Agent, Owner, J>ar,tncr
l
......
• , .. , !
I I
I ;
•
\)
H~c $1Uv.OO {_?~Ok RECEIPT NO: r, -·· ·r·
• ·ENVJRONMENfAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HJPM -Part I /' 'fl,,~
(To be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE No: cur-t 'l , ____ _
DATE:
Appl ic:ant: 7. f. k II H .N 11 M cJ {/ I ---
Address cf Applicant: 5 "3 3 J /VI T. 8 {) l. A/' 1111 /fl
~/1/V_ DJ E IJtJ C..11. J,2. IJ/
Phone Number: (7/'f) 5·/c1 -~ J 5 J
Name, address and phone·numter of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant):
GENERI\L INFORivtATION:
V /J r,//1 ,II T l I !T O A /r11J PIii ~/.f:;--(" (7 Llw,; /?,:? Description of Project: >i <r n hv ~ /VJ ~ >/Tr"-.,,,~ -------
✓/{) t I} ,; P!N'/3 131) /_] ' IJ IA H tJ/<fY 1 Pt:1PL T,l)B LE /}/V' p H/l-✓p )3/}L~S
__ .,. ___________________ ---
Project Location/A<ldre~s: • 5d :J E L/11 #e.. C, I/If l. ~$,4/)
. -· -----------------~------------
Assessor Parcel Nurnber: YJ 19 F -·_3~ 3 -~ 51 7 -~ :3
Zone of Subject Property: Ct/JfVYlfif(, et/ll Zt71'V"'C C,, (
Proposed Use of Site: _____ /J __ B __ e ___ f} ___ D_& _______________ _
List all other applicable applications related to this project: . ;v~
c ITV . ,:; r c II/( L 1$,11 O • .II p f?L IC llIJp/V Ft1R 8v n,,,/c ~5
LIL e¥.J13 .. ------..---------------
-------------------------------
ND l
EIR l
. .
-----)
2. '. Desc:d.be t.he 2.ctivi ty area, inciuding distinguishing
natural and manmadc characteristics;. also provide precise
_sl.oi;.,e analysis when appropriate.
3. D.escribe energy conservation measures· incorporated into
t.he design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
specific discussion of·energy conservation requirements
see ,,,. of the City's EIR _Guidelines) /Y/1)-
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
/2
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,.
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
L~d loading facilities .
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities.
/2
~
7. If instituJ:.ional, indicate the major function, estimated
employreent"per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
. .
.•
I·; ENVIRONMENTAL "IMPAC~ ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriat·e space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessaryt.
1}
.•
2)
3)
Could the project significantly change present
·1and uses in the vicinity of th:e_activity?
Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important
aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neig~borhood?
• 4) Could the activity result in the displacement
of community residents?
..
5) Could the activity increase the number of low
-and moderate cost housing units in the city?
6)
7)
Could the activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity ~rea unique, that ts, not·
found in other parts of the County, State,
or Nation?
8} Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
10} Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source'of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
species?
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
·12) ~re there any rare or endangered plant
species in the acti vi.ty area?.
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
tidelands?
...
YES NO
---
----
lir} Could the activity change existing features of
any of the cityts beaches?
15) Could· the activity result in the erosion or
elimination cf agricultural lands?
16). Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas?
17). Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc)?
18) • Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency?
19J Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city?
20} Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21}. W:i.11 the activity involve construction of
facilities in a-flood plain? •
22) Will the activity involve construction of
f~cilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24)" Could the act1vity result in the generation
of s~gni.ficant amounts of noise?.
25) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amoun~s of dust? •
26} Will the activity involve the bur-ning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
. region's air or water resources? (Should note,
s~rface, ground water, off-shore}-.
28} Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)?
29) Wi.lJ. there be a. significant ch:ange to existing
land form?
✓
✓
.. ✓.
; .
30)
(a}
(b)
--
indicate ·estimarJ/agrading to be done in
cubic yards_ • • • __
percentage of alteration to the present
land form . NaN€
(c) maxi.mum heigh3/J± cut_ or fill slopes
Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers., _drains, or
streets?
31) Is the a~tivity carried out as part of a larger·
project or series of projects?
. -s-
.. -
II. STATEMENT OF NON..:SIGNIFICANT "ENVIRONMEN'D\L EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or rr.ore of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have· no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
III; C~f\1ENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO Af.N OF 1HE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed}.
n
Date Signed ----------------------
EN\frJ:.OI'~·iJ:'.'ff1\L Jr.lPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -Part II
(To Be Complete<l By The
PJ..!\J,lNING DEPAR1i!ENf)
-fJ\SE NO. CtJf /_r_]
DATE: J_::_!l_._:.l.J_5 __ l -
I. BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
APPLICANT: :}'. /? .. K.!tH tJ kV\11.li JI
ADDRESS A,'Il) PHO:-.'E NU~IBER OF APPLICANT: S3 3:}
SAN D,ao, Ckur.
DATE QiECKLIST SUE1'1UTTED: • /,,,. i-2, f; ---~...;__ ________________ _
II. • ENVJR0N>1ENJAL DIPACTS
"(EXPL!\;'\J\TibNS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE Ai~S\\'ERS ARE TO BE MUTIBN UNDER
Section III -DISCUSSION OF ENVIR0}01E\1TAL EVALUATirn~)
1. T:1-.· th WiJ.1 the proposal have signi-
ficant results in: •
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructl..lres?
. b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The dcstrnctjon, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e~ /my increase in wind or :water
erosion of soils. either on or off
the site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of bc-ach san<ls, or changes
in siltation, de-position or erosion
which may modify the ch~nncl of a
river or strc:u:i or the bcu of the
ocean or any h.'.ly. inlet or lake?
Yes
···X
···X
..
..
2. Air: Will thC? proposal have signr/7tAJ/]-
rcsults in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. TI1e creation of objectionable
odors?
c. .Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
• change in climate, either lqcally _
. or regionally?
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
ficant results in:
·a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
' waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
• drainage patterns, or the rate and
• ammmt of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flvw of flood waters?
d. Change in the runount of sur-
face ·water in any water body? . .
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
.)later quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the d:irection
or rate of flow 0£ _ground waters?
_ g, Change in the quantity of
gr01.md waters, either through
• direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of nn
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Rc-.duction in the runount of
water othcn-li sc available for
public water suppUcs?
.. z ..
Yes Maybe No
X
..
X
• )(
·X
• ·i ..
····X
· I
..
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b .. Reduction of the numbers o:f
any unique, rare or endangered
• species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
,of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the nonnal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. . Reduction in acreage of any
_agricultural crop?
-5.. • ·Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity·of
species, or numi.>ers of any species
of-animals (birds, land animals
includj11g reptiles, fish and s}!r:11-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the m.unbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of anllilals?
··c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or.result
in a barrier to· the 1nigration or
movement of anjmals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
6, • 'Noise. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7. • -~ht nnd Glare. Will the pro-
posal sji~nifjcantly produce new
light or glnrc?
8. • Land Use. Will the proposal have
sir,n.ifk:mt results in the alt:C'ration
of the present or planned 1.m<l use of
an area?
Maybe No
x
··X
···X
·-·X
....
X
__ .,.
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of.any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset~ Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
ro...-plosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but . ·not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11. • ·pc,>pulation. Will the proposal
• • s1gnificantly alter the location;
' . distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of
an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
Rcantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. • ·Transportation/Circulation. Will -
the proposal have significant re-•
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b, Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c, Impact upon cxisti;11g trans-
portation systems?
d, Al tcrntions to present
patterns of circulation or move~
,ncnt of 11c0J);l.e ru1d/or goods?
e, Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air tra{fic7
f., Increase jn trnf fie kizards
to 111otor vehicles, hi.cyclists or
'IVV1 • ? 1, ... "'estrJnns,
Yes Maybe No
····><
...
.. •.• ..
..
· • 14. Ptibl ic Services . Wil 1 the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
•·:facilities? .•
e~ Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15.' Energy. Will the .:proposal have
significant results in:
a.. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment oJ new sources of energy?
, . .; 16. • ·utilities. Will the proposal have~
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
followi_ng utilities:
a. Power_ OT natural_ gasr
b, Communications sy~tcms?
c, Water?
• e
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e, Stonn water drainage?
f, Solid w~istc and disposal?
17, • llL1man l?c:11th. Will the proposal
have sign igTcant rcsul ts in the
c1·cation of rmy health hawrc.l or
potent fol hc:11 th haznrd (~xclucUng
J11cntal hcnl th)?
-s-
..
Yes --Maybe No
. .. . . :
......
.• ....
X
X
·x
X
.. --x
... x'
···)( •
... X
.. · x
··.:½_
. . ·}(
.. ·X
..
..
Yes ·~faybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-.
posal result in the creation of an •
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? • ' ·X
19. Recreation. Will-the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
• existing re~reational opporttmities? .
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
• archeological or historical site,
• structure, object or building? .
21. ANALYZF VIABLE AL'fERi~ATIVES TO TI-IE PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DEVELOI?~ff:~T OF 11IE PROJECT; b) AL'!l:RNAT'I~ SITE
DESIGNS; c) . ALTERNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPri-!HIT; d) 1\LTERi\~\TE
USES FOR TI-IE SITE; e) DEVELOi~!Et'ff AT SQ\!E HfTIJRF. TIME RATh1:R
'IHA.~ NOW; f) ALTEI<i~TE SITES FOR Tiffi PROPOSED USE; g)-NO
PROJECT ALT.E!~'i\ TIVE .
..
-'
-6-
)(
X
..
J':.•
Yes Maybe No
22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICA.~CE.
a) DOES TIIE PROJECT HA VE THE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE TIIE QUALITY OF
'DIE ENVIRONMENT, OR CUR1~\IL 1lIE •
DIVERSI'IY IN 1HE Ef\1VIROM'-1ENT?
b) DOES TilE PROJECT HAVE TI-IE POTEN-
TIPJ.. TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, 10
'IlIB DISADV1-\NTAGE OF LONG-TERM,
ENVIRONMf¾ITPJ.. GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM· IMPACT ON 1HE E.\1VIR0~1ENT
IS ONE MUCH OCCURS IN A RE-
. LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF Tn~m MULE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO
THE HJTt.JRE-.) ·
c) . OOES TI-IE PROJECT Hi\VE IMPACTS .
WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BUT Cill-1ULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE?
• (A PROJECT MAY DIPACT ON TWO
·OR NORE SEPARATE RESOURCES
l\'I-IERE TI-IE Ufi)ACT ON EAGI RE-
SOURCE IS RELATN£LY S-li\LL,
• BUT Wf IERE TI-IE EFFECT OF TIIE
"IDTAL OF TIIOSE DIPACTS ON Tiffi
ENVIR0:'6-!Et"-4T IS SIGNIFICANT )
dJ DOES ·nm PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS l\HICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTAi\J'fIAL ADVERSE
• • EFFECTS ON I-IlThlAN BEINGS,
EI'IHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III.· LISCUSSION OF B\VIRONMENTAL EVALUTION
X
~ fli/P1.,,1c11-111,. 1> t~t;t/c..5TlAIG-·_IJ CdAJfJtTJdNA-l.
• vs~ PFFPfVl,, n hU-ow A ll>1AJ -ope=-~~
/Jr(l,~D~ IN AN €Xt51}NI!"' (J,11;i1>1tJtr 1"1 ~-
c,t;'rJ TflA1_, 13,1 £1 ilFss · bt<; m, c:r ·",c c~A-0. . 5ttv c ~ . •
· · 1/0 /1i)l)/JJbn/~ J)~IJE),,O~~N1 ~ 1Jlt 1_.t}l\)j)
-.
/$ (leqv1/l~I) ~ ~f\/lf ·IJ1J0-i11f!/II~ /l'VlP/lc1
lol/1;() /J:>€ 1>Jt° ~MAU..-/f'f.JD11J'tvy~· ~(.. JMP/itJ
-7-..
1nsarsSJON OF ENVIROi\'Mf:NTAL EVALU.\TJON (Continued)
tflk kfeO e y_ 1Jk' ft,ffrtn ~ vs€ .
f
..
..
IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY nm. PL\NNING DEPAR'l},ffiNT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
2(_ • I find the proposed project COULD NOT ha;c· ~ significant·
• effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared. •
I find that although the proposed project could have a . •
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because tl1e mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
wi~l be prepared.
I·find the proposed project MI\Y have a signi:ficarit effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
V. MITIGATING :fv1E.I\SURES (IF APPLICABLE)
..
. .
,.-
.•
..
.. ... MITIGATING MEASURES (~ontinued)
VI ·"·APPLICA1'\T ·co?\CUP~'IBNCE ·wrTH MITIGATING MEASURES
,;
...
'IlUS IS ·m CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED 1HE ABCJVE MITIGATIONG MEA-
SURES AND CONCUR 1\111-I TI-IE ADDITION OF IBESE MEASURES TO Tiffi PROJl:.::CT.
Date:· ------------·Signature of Applicant
. . -'
-10-
..
AcA~...Sf4-0P
B (r.1,..b..~ ~P
C p,zo~.e:D
P.,2.c..~ 0 .e::.
. CASE NO. CUP lq7
LJc..
.A IP IP l IC AN T--"'K~AH~NA~M~f'L~' I ____ _
cay. of. C'.¥.s':»ad •
fta,rJng Com1ninion
.· .
..
:' -. •
P. 'f. -.Poo1-~ A&G _·
· r:. e,. -foos8A-L'-
v. D. -1/IP~o n11\Q-f.
--··EIM AV£
.. . --
City of -Ca,!~b..di •t .
Planning Comm~i?ff .I .-_
Ca~ No. V..1/f.~li ...•
Exhibit No. : .. 6 .. · • __ _
. Dale .i/J/fL_