Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-22; Planning Commission; ; CUP 203 - BLANKENSHIPDATE: TO: FROM: STAFF REPORT July 22, 1981 Plannning Commission Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP-203,·BLANKENSHIP -Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church with weekly and holiday assemblages at 3138 Roosevelt Street in an existing office/retail development in the C-2 zone. This Conditional Use Permit was requested by Mr. Blankenship to allow Unity of Carlsbad to hold church related assemblages at his recently constructed office/retail development. A representative of Unity of Carlsbad attended the DCC meeting of July14, 1981. After the applicant reviewed the report and proposed conditions she felt it was not in their best interests to pursue the project at this time. The applicant, therefore, decided to withdraw the request for a Conditional Use Permit. Attachments: Letter from Mr. Blankenship MH:ar 7/16/81 BLANKENSHIP DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. July 15, 1981 Mr. James Hagaman Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad,Ca. 92008 Re: CUP 203 Blankenship Dear Jim, RECEIVED JUL 16 1981 CITY OF CARLSBAD Plannlng Department I would like to withdraw-my request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Unity of Carlsbad, located at 3138 Roosevelt Street, scheduled for the July 22, 1981 meeting of the Planning Commission. P.O. Box 1307 / carlsbad, CA 92008 / (714) 434-1051 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP~203, BLANKENSHIP -Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a church with weekly and holiday assemblages at 3138 Roosevelt Street in an existing office/retail development in the C-2 zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is applying for a conditional use permit to allow Unity of Carlsbad to hold assemblages at a recently constructed office/retail complex located as described above. Unity of Carlsbad intends to hold its primary religious assemblages once a week, Sundays from 10-11 A.M., and on Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years Eve. The applicant has indicated that approximately 10-50 people will attend a typical meeting. The applicant has also indicated that unscheduled night-time class meetings will be held 2-3 times a week. These evening classes will start at 7:30, last approximately two hours and be attended by approximately 12 people. A representative of Unity of Carlsbad recently informed staff that they also plan to hold prayer meetings from 10-11 A.M. on Wednesdays. Also, weekday class meetings will be held from 10- 11 A.M. on one other day. Staff was informed that approximately 6-8 people will be attending these weekday meetings, but that Unity of Carlsbad hopes to have a better attendance in the future. As shown on Exhibit A the assemblages will be held in rooms C and D of Roosevelt Plaza which have combined area of 1010 square feet. Room E will be used for office purposes by Unity of Carlsbad. The properties to the south and east of the subject property are occupied by single family dwellings. The property to the north is occupied by a convenience store while the property to the west is occupied by the Carlsbad Boy's Club. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1) Can the four findings, required for approval of a Conditional Use Permit, be made? a. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community; is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; b. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; c. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; d. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. Discussion As proposed the use is in conformance with the goals of the general plan; however, staff has concerns that there will not be enough on-site parking available to handle the demand generated by the requested daytime meetings as well as the parking generated by other uses in the building. Therefore, the use as presently proposed could have a detrimental effect on existing uses or other specifically permitted uses in the area. This conflict could be eliminated if a condition of approval limited the assemblages and classes to evenings and Sundays. As shown on Exhibit °C 0 , the room is adequate in size to handle the proposed use. If all of the assemblages and classes are held while the other suites are vacant, there should be sufficient on-site parking available. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit has been conditioned to limit the number of people that may assemble at one time to 50 so that sufficient on-site parking will be available. All of the yards, setbacks, fences, landscaping and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained. The proposed use will have no effect on the physical aspects of the site since all activity will take place within an existing building. It' appears that the existing street system serving the proposed use is adequate to handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. If the conditions recommended by staff are applied, staff feels that the proposed use will be compatible with the existing uses in the vicinity and that all the required findings for approval of a Conditional Use Permit can be made for this project. V. ENVIRONMENTAL-REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore issued a Negative Declaration dated July 1, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Resolution No. 1836, APPROVING CUP-203, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS 1) PC Resolution No. 1836 2) Background Data Sheet 3) Location Map 4) Disclosure Form 5) Environmental Documents 6) Exhibits "A" -"C" dated, June 6, 1981 MH:ar 7/8/81 -3- BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CUP-203 APPLICANT: JEFF BLANKENSHIP; ET.AL. REQUEST AND LCCATION: CUP to allow an assemblage once a week and Tha~ks- g1v1ng, Christmas and New Years Eve, on the east side of.Roosevelt between Oak and Pine Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 10, 11, 12 and 13 in Block 40 of the townsi te of Carlsbad, according to Map 535· filed May 2, 1888. Assessors Parcel Number: 2 0 4 022 02,03,04 Acres • 32 No. of Lots 1 ------------ GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation CBD -------- Density Allowed __ _.N~t~A...__ __ _ Density Proposed N/A Existing zone c.-2 ------------- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: zoning North C-2 South c-2 East R-3 West C-2 Proposed Zone Land Use Commercial SFD SFD Boys Club PUBLIC FACILI'l'IES Carlsbad Carlsbad -------- N/A --------- School District Water District Sewer District Carlsbad EDU's N/A ------------------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated May 26, 1981 ------------------ (Other: ____________________________ ) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued • July 1, 19 81 Log No. ----X E.I.R. Certified, dated --------------- Other, -· LOCJ-iTION I I OAK PINE I I . :a. 0 . O'W • ·-en.,. . fll CD < -"' ~ -I u, . -I ·al38 ROOSEVELT ST CASE NO. c.ue . .203 I I APPLICANT BL~~Sl-1\P I I . I . : . --~ . AVE ~ ·S.· . AVE I · VICINITY MAP ' "'. : If after the informatior ,~ have suh~itted has been rev~-~a, it is determined that further information is required, you will be so adv_ a. APPLICANT: AGENT: Jeff Blankenship, et al Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 3138 Roosevelt St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Address (714} 434-1051 Telephone Number Land Planners, Jean Jensen Name 2406-C Altisma Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Address '.(714} 4 38-0178 Telephone Number (1) Susan J. Blankenship MEMBERS: (2) Jeffrey Blankenship (1 & 2) 344 Chinquapin St., C~rlsbad, CA Home Address Name -{individual, partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) (1) 2906 State St., Carlsbad, CA (2)3138 Roosevelt St., Carlsbad, Business Address (1) (714) 729-2477 (2) (714) 434-1051 92008 CA 92008 (1 & 2) (714) 729-5013 Telephone Number Telephone NUllU)er Thomas H._ Alexander 10389 Avenida Magnifica, pan Diego ---Home Address 92131 Na.me 3138 Roosevelt St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Address {714) 434-4074 ---------(7] 4) 566-8806 Telephone ~lumber (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be· relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY --~---"'~---~..,.;z:;~------------·--Ag«)nt, Owner, Partner , . -. Fb.i.; $100.00 RECEIPT NO: ------- ENVIRONMENTAL • IMPACT ASSESSMENI' FORM -Part l (To be Completed by APPLICANT) C.ASE NO:· C tf fY--')..P,s DATE: • May 26, 1981 Applicant: • __ J_e_f_f_B_l_a_n_k __ en_s_h_i.:..p.:..,_e_t_a_l ________________ _ Address of Applicant: 3138 Roosevelt St., Carlsbad, ,CA 92008 Phone Number: (714) __ 4;;..;3;;..;4=---=1::.:0;..::5~1~----- Name, address and phone nl.Illlber of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): Land Planners, Jean Jensen, 2406-C Altisma Way, CarJshad, CA 92008 (714)438-0178 'GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: A commercial/professional complex· structure in a completed construction state. A CUP is being requested for the assemblage of people once a week in a portion of this structure. Project Location/Address: 31 38 Roosevelt St., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Assessor Parcel Nl.Illlber: 204 .,; -022 02,03 & 04 Zone of Subject Property: C-2 Proposed Use of Site: As zoned except for only one minor portion of the building (approx. 1,000 Sq. Ft.). This exception will be utilized by Unify of Carlsbad for asserobJ age purpoiiili'il once a. wool< (Sunda:y3 from 10-11} and on Thanksgiving Eve, Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve in the evenings Groups may number between JO 5D Uoscheduled evenin~ classes will have approx. 12 people in att~ndapce. . . . . List all other applicable applications related to this proJect: ______ _ Conditional Use Permit ND 1 EIR l ' . ) 2. Describe the activity area, inciuding distinguishing natural and manma<le characteristics;. also provide precise _slope analysis when appropriate. • 3. • N/A Dezcribe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of· energy conservation requirements see of the City's EIR Guidelines) .. N/A . 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, ~~a loading facilities. N/A 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A • 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A _,._ • I. ENVTRONM.8NTAL "IMPACT. ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriat·e space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessary)_. 1) 2) 3) Could the project significantly change presept ·1and uses i~ the vicinity of t~e_activity? Could the activity affect the use of a rec- reational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low -and moderate cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity ,decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 7) ~.re any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, -that is, not • found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation? 8} Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? -lO)· Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source'of_water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish species? 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? ·121 ~re there any rare or endangered plant species •in the activity area?. 13) Could the activity change-existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? YES NO X --- X ---- X X X x X. x-- X X X X X 14) Could the activ·ity change existing features of any of _the city's beaches? 15) Could· the activity resuit in the erosion or elimination of agricult:ural lands? 16)· Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify development of already developed·areas? 17).' Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards {air, water, noise, etc)? 18) Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any .local, state or federal environmental control agency? 1~) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the city? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 21). Will the activity involve construction of ~acilities in a flood plain? • 22) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 23) Wil-1 the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 24). Could the act1vity result in the generation of s~gnificant amounts of noise?, 25} Could the activity result in the generation of significant amoun·ts· of dust? •• 26) Will the activity involve the bur-ning of brush, trees, or other materials? ·21) Could the activity result in a significant change in the qua!ity of any portion of the . region's air or water resources? (Should note, s~rface, ground water, off-shore). 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a.significant c~ange to existing land form? X X X X X X X X X. X X ·X .x X X x...._ __ • 30) .• 31) - (a} indicate ·estimated grading to be done in cubic yards ___ N_/_A ____ _ (b) perce·ntage of alteration to the present land form. N/A (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes N/A Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewer~, _drain~, or streets? Is the activity carried out as part of a larger ·project or series of projects? -5- X X X ·x ' .. II. STATEMENT OF NON~SIGNIFICANT .ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: The Conditional Use Permit is being obtained for the purpose o~ assemb~age. The structure is already in a completed state and will req~ire no additional building permits, etc. see Proposed Use of Site for explanation beyond this point (pg. 1). IIL CCM,IBNTS OR ELABORATIONS m ANY OF ·nrn QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Signature ·----e5_,,-.c.-..,,_""'-...;;--:«=s"""o~;;-c-om-~_,l~e-t,..,·~-'-g_,·,....-_ep_o_·~-;,....· ),...------- Date Signed __ -_M_a_y_2_6_-_, _1_9_8_1_-_-___________ _ .•• ENVIRONMENTAL INPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -Part II (To Be Completed By TI1e PLANNING DEPAR11'-D~NT) CASE 00. C. U f'-:2 0.3 DATE: If /i /Sl .· I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: -:r ~ .fl· 13/~ ,,,,,j;,N .$ ~/pl ----------------,--------- 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE ·:NUMBEil° OF APPLICANI': J/ s 8' ~c-e.srv~/T •• ·S'-/.red C~ Y'/s t4·t::I' • • c4, . f )o~-~ 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED:. .: II .•• ENVIRONMENTAL .IMPACTS (EXPLAi'J.i\TlONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE A'lSWERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER Section III -DISCUSSION OF E\VIR0~1ENTAL EVALUATION) 1. ·Earth Will the proposal have signi- ficru~i:. results in: • a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ·b. Disn1ptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change jn topography or grmmd surface relief features? • d. The destruction,· covering or modificntion of nny 1mique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? £. Changes in deposition or cro- sjon of bc-ach sands, ·or ckmgcs in sil.tr1tJon, deposition or erosion wl1i.ch m:1y mod.i fy the cfomncl of a :river or stream or the bed of the ocean or tin)' lxiy, inlet or lake? • ·yes • ·Maybe -\ ND 2 Z. Air: Will the proposal have signi-· results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, mositure or t~nperaturc, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3: Water: Will the proposal have sigi- 'ficant results in: a. Changes in currents , or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorptio;i. rates, drainage patteins, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d.. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e, Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface . water quality, including but not limited to t6nperature, dissolved oxygen or turb;i.dity? f, Alteration of the direction or rate of flow o;f ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of gro.und·watcrs, either through • direct ndditjons or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otl1crwisc nva Hable for public ~atcr supplies? • ·Yes Maybe No .. _j_ J_ · f. ... ·x ,•· 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal :have signi- ficant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species ·of plants (including trees,· shrubs, grass, crops, micro flora and aquat~c plants)? h. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species --of plants into an area, or in a barrier to-the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any ~gricultural crop? . S... ·Animal Life. Will the proposal 11ave signi.-: ficant results in: a, Changes in the·diversity of species·, or mnnbcrs of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and sheJl- fish, bcnthic organisms, insects or micro fauna)? b, Reduction of the mnnbers ·of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species 0£ animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? • d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6, • ·Noise. Will the proposal signi~ Iicnntly increase existing noise levels? 7. • -~ .. ight :md Glnrc. Will_ the pro- }JOsal s1gnific~111tly produce new li.ght or glare? 8. Lnncl Use. Will the propm:;al have s1gnif"'iamt results in the. alteration 0£ the present or plmmcd lan<l use of an nrca? ·yes Maybe No .. ·-t- .. y: . ' 9. Natural Resources. • Will the pro- posal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of.any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. • Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, _distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of 12. an area? ~ Housing. Will the proposal signi- "ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. • ·Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults in: • a .. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for·ncw parking? • c, Impact upon· existing trans- portation sy5tcms? d, Alterations to pfcscnt patterns of circulation or move .. ment 0£ pc~plc and/or goods? c, Altcratjons to w:itcrbornc, ~ail or air tra!£ic7 £, Incrcnsc in traf::(ic hn1.nrds to 11101:or vehicles,· bicyclists or pcdcstrfans? • • • Yes Maybe No ··--x I• I•• • 'I. t • t -, , .. .. . •' 14. Puhl ic Senriccs. Will -the pro- posal have a significant cf.feet upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. F~re protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? . d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. ~1aintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? £." Other governmental services? 1.5. ~er&')'. Will the .:proposal have s_1gniTicant results in: a,· Use of substantial .amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require t.he develop·· ment of new sources of energy? ,,.,. 16. • -Utilities. Will the proposal have· significant results in the need for riew systems, or alterations to the followj_ng utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b, Communications systems? c, Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e, Stonn wat.c_r clrainagc7 £.. Solid waste nnd 'disposal? 17, • Unman Jlc-n lt h, Wi 11 the.' propo~al bavc sig1ligTc:mt rC'snlts in the crcntJon of ,my ·Jwalth haznrd or potential health ha:rir<l _(C'.xclucling mental hcalth)7 ·Yes ~ybe_ No ...... ' ,; -x 1 ... ·x-- ····X ··L ··J_. ····Y ····x ···I .. 18. Acsthcti c~. Will tl1c proposal have significant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will. the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existi~g recreational opportunities? 20. Archcologicnl/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, • structure, object or building? Yes M.iybe No 21. ANALYZF VIABLE ALTER.i\JATIVES TO 1HE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: • a) PHASEO Dc"\l}J.OP~·)l:;:;T OF THE PROJECT; b) ALTIRMl\1t SITE DESIGNS; c). ALTEit'xATE SCALE OP DEVELOPMF'.NT; d) AL1l:RNATE USES FOR THE SITE; e) DEVELOP~1ENT AT SCT\!J~ HfIURE TIME RA11-:1:R 'IHA.~ NOW; £) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT AL TFJ~'IA TIVE. NA .. ·. .. ... 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE . • a) DOES 11-lli PROJECT H'\.VE TI-IE P0TEN-· TIAL TO DEGRADE 11IE QUALI1Y OF 1HE ENVIRO~IIJ,.;T, OR CURTAIL 1HE DIVERSITY IN 11-IE ENVIRONMEt'IT? b) DOES 1HE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAI.. TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO 'lHE DISADVAi\l'fAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON TI-IE ENVIR0~JMENT IS ONE WHICH OCCURS iN A RE-. LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITTITE PERIOD OF TIME lvHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL EI\1DURE WELL INID TI-IE RJTIJRE.) c) DOES 1HE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WI-UOI ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITFJ), BUT ClJMULATIVELY C0NSIDERA.BLE? _-(A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TWO OR )URE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE TI-IE IMPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS REIJ\TIVELY ~l•\LL, BlIT l\1HERE TI-IE EFFECT OF TI-IE TOTAL OF TI-10SE U1PACTS ON 11-IB -F.f'/IRON\fENT IS SIGNIFIO\NT.). d) DOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTAi'ffIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMl\N BEINGS, EITIIER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.· LISCUSSI0N OF BWIROl\'MF.NfAL EVALUTI0N Yes Maybe No • •• T4~ · Cv1V//-//1>N~ I _U.$1' ·r';.,,.~/~ i$ ~".,,1/V_:, ·>-tf'1~.sf,/ f" ~l/4w. ~.,.. t-4" ,,~,.,//4/i d-r /J~P~#. P/Vt't' ~ ·1,v('~,/' ~y ~~,,1~/~u.S Jf'&f_r/~.f't'.> ,,/~ ~ • Yi'Ct' A/ 1-j Ct'~~ J,,-"' t"7~;r • t::.t::-"'? ~t';c·,;-~)//J Y'# -l'ess ~N~) cc,Mj.J/t'/4 . T hi.s "fs_e C()_Lt/d A/v-tYs~!f e-f~c-r T~~ _ ~ ,.,~"' ,v /: t;,·.f-/J;,Y)r//Vj. 4 Vllf//4(/e fe, . I~ /s:· ro>;P,1~ _ A.;.,-w1"'Vt')" f)fl Ce; ,N ,I'; r}J?.N~/ U.St' /t''J'~/ r I w/// 1~. C6JV~'1,)PN,~ Se; -1,~1" 4// 1~,,(' .,,, l✓,,,,-;tlV)J.S t.v1/( ~~It'~ Y. /111 .7'"A( . . . -7-.. . . . DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) (. v (Iii f ,v J j . I ,.,7 ,.; ~(_N . f-,fr "fdfY' " .f-//c ~ "In,,,( C 0 h,.,, re .i"I/ ~.s I'S /,v f~/5 Ct>Nf'#)( w/// AJc-/ • A/~.!'/ f ,f 1 . ;,-, y/(; ,v}" ./;;,,-/ !/I ;.-s. • .. .. ' . .. IV. ·nETERMINJ\TION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY 'IlIE PLANNING DEPAR1MENT) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find tJ1e proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECIARATION will be prepared. • I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wi11·not be a significant effect in this case because the mi t_igation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. J £ind the proposed project MAY.have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMEr-..1TAL IMPACT.REPORT is required. ~1gnature V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) .. .. -, r, ,; ..