The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-08-12; Planning Commission; ; CUP 204 - ST. PATRICK'S CHURCHSTAFF REPORT DATE: August 12, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP-204 -ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH Request for approval of a conditional use permit to remove an existing single family house and construct a new sanctuary for the ex- isting St. Patrick's Church on property located on the northwest corner of Adams Street and Tamarack Avenue in the R-1 zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct a new sanctuary for the existing St. Patrick's Church on a 3.46 acre site. The application also includes removal of a single family residence presently owned by the church. The new sanctuary would have a seating capacity of 750 people and, along with it, the applicant proposes a library, choir room, children's room, large court yard area and a 60' high church spire. The existing church consists of 19,206 square feet of building area. The new facilities would add 9,800 square feet of building area for a total of 29,006 square feet for the church. Present- ly, 89 parking spaces are located on the site and, as condi- tioned, an additional 36 spaces would be added to accomodate the new facility. The total building and parking coverage is 43%: the remaining 57% of the site would consist of landscaping and open areas. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1) Is the parking conveniently located to users of the church facility? 2) Would the proposed 60' church spire have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area? 3) Can all the findings for a conditional use permit be made? III. DISCUSSION As shown by Exhibit "A", the majority of parking for the new sanctuary is located on the extreme north end of the 3.46 acre site, on the opposite side of the lot from the location of the proposed sanctuary. Although some parking would be provided ad- jacent to the new sanctuary, at capacity, most people would have to park in the northernmost parking lot which is a distance of over 360 feet from the sanctuary. As an alternative, many people· would likely park along Adams Avenue and Tamarack Avenue. Staff's primary concern is the relationship of the sanctuary to the parking areas. Without a significant reduction in the size of the new facility or a major modification of the existing facility, inconvenient parking seems to be an inherent problem with this site. Although staff has concerns with the location of the parking areas, it may be acceptable given the nature of the use and the fact that the peak use time of the church on Sunday mornings will not coin- cide with peak use times on Tamarack and Adams. The Commission should be aware that most people would likely park along Adams Street rather than the northernmost parking lot because of the greater convenience of these spaces. The second issue with this project is the proposed 60' high church spire. This structure will be approximately twice the height of the sanctuary and is located on the corner of the lot at the intersection of Tamarack and Adams. Section 21.46.020 of the zone Code allows towers and similar structures to exceed the 35' height limit. The conditional use permit process, however, allows the Commission to regulate height of such structures to ensure that it is in substantial harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. As a point of background, the Commission approved a similar spire as part of a conditional use permit for the Mormon Church located on the southwest corner of Monroe and Chestnut in Decem- ber 1977. The Mormon spire is 58'10" in height measured from the floor level of the church. Staff believes the height of the St. Patrick's Church spire is excessive and would have adverse visual impacts on surrounding properties. Staff suggests that the Commission field inspect the Mormon Church spire prior to the public hearing for this item, since its visual impacts would be similar to the St. Patrick's spire. The Commission has the discretion to place any height limit on the spire as deemed necessary to ensure that it is in sunstantial harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a condition of approval reducing the height of the spire to 45', a reduction of 15'. Staff believes at this height, the spire is in scale with -2- the church structure. A graphic presentation will be given at the Planning Commission meeting demonstrating this. Staff feels the project meets all other findings of a conditional use permit. The church will be in harmony with the community and surrounding neighborhood and the site is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the proposed use. Also, staff has found the street system is adequate to properly handle traffic generated by the proposed use. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration, dated July 24, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Nega- tive Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resol- ution No. 1845 APPROVING CUP-204, based on the findings and sub- ject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Resolution No. 1845 Location Map Background Data Sheet Reduced Elevation and Site Plans Disclosure Form Environmental Documents Exhibits "A and B", dated June 4, 1981 BH:wl 8/4/81 -3- ' ' BACKGROUND DATA SI:IEE:r ~NO; CUP 204/V 323 APPLICANT: St. Patrick's Church REOJE,ST AND IOCATION: CUP to construct a sanctuary structure and variance to construct a church spire on the northwest corner of Adams Street and Tamarack Avenue.• LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of Lot 236 of Thomiands in the City. of Carlsbad according to map 1681 filed December 9, 1913. Assessors Parcel Number: 205, 270 -09,41,42 Acres 3. 5 No. of lots ------------ GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation --------RLM Density Allo.-,ed 0-4 ----------Density. Proposed N/ a ---------- Existing Zone -------------R-1 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning North R-1 -------- South __ c_-_1 __ Fast R-1 West N/a Proposed Zone --------- Land Use Single family residential Cammerci.al Single family residential Gas station PUBLIC FACILI'I'IES Carlsbad Carlsbad School District Water District Sewer District Carlsbad -EDU's ------------------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Not required; non-profit _org. (~: ) --------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT __ x __ Negative Declaration, issued 7 /24/81 E.I.R. Certified, dated -------------- Log No. other,-------------------------------- 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Citp of Carlsllab PUBLIC·NOTICE _OF .PREPAAATION The Planning Depa.rtment of the· City of Carlsbad intends-to prepare a. Negative Declaration for the following project: • • Project Description: A conditional use permit to co_nstrtict a church .. _ The project i.ncl udes the construction of a new sanctuary and the removal of existing single family dwellings. Project address/Location: 3821 Adams Street .. Northwest corner of Adams Street and Tamarack Avenue. • _,Anticipated significant impacts:· None We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could be revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage. Your ideas will help us decide what issues .to analyze in the environ-- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department. 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008. no later than July 27. DATED: July 6> 1981 CASE NO: CUP-204/V-323 APPLICANT: ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH PUBLISH DATE: July 11,· 9181 ND 3 5/81 438-SStl If after, the information_you have submitted has been rev~--"!Wed, it is determined t!-,at further informatic s required, you will be so ad· !d. APPLICANT: AGENT: MEMBERS: Name (individual, partnership,.joint venture, corporation, syndication) ~I PCtMP 6T . -~ C,,6r. q~ Business Ad~ess r . , _ _ (714) 7~-2etdp Telephone Number Name 212' ~L:[gr.", Business Address Telephone N~r • N~e ·(individual, partner, joint ven~ure, corporation, syndication)• Business Address Telephone Number Na.me B~siness Address Telephone Number ~ome Address Telephone Number Home Address Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will ~emain true and correct and may be· relied upon as being true and correct until amended. ------,.-----~ , . John P. Landry Inc. 1e11 Rootowelt llroot Corlell■d, Collfornlo e:tOOI ARCHITl!CTUIU! • l"LANNING 714/ne-.. M I -·------Tl-~, ~~· ;../ [ '3'~~ -g; I I I I ,,_L_ ----x----1- ~ ( ;, ,-+. i ! I , -~, ! -~ t l !( ~· ~n'' __ .. , , • . --P.' .___ I r> ;j' !1 r ~ John P. Landry Inc. Nl1 MeHHlt 11, .. 1 c:.r1•~••, ~•Ht•r••• eaoo• • AIICNITICTUIII • Ill.ANNING n•Jn•-.. .,. +---- l - -,r------- ,1. J.,i~ • I ---~ ~, :-=~-11 ~-. -----~ .. ..!i. " ' -- , I • Loc:.TION 1t TAMARACK· CASE NO. GU.Pzot/V-.3.23 . APPLICANT Sf ~1:'KICK~ CHLISC.rf . L· --LARKSPUR • LN. • : )It -•· C, )Ii =-= u, u; .-1 AVE -VICINITY MAP .. •• ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOPM -Part II (To Be Completed By 'The PI..At~ING DEPAR'fl,1EN'f) .•• r.ASE NO. cue 201/ V-32 J . DATE:~ 8 I _ --. I .. BACKGROUND 1. .APPLICANf : _ __,5:s__.ct:_.-. .__-.... +2--.e.~:r ..... S-\a.;;:. ·:a.=c.=\(.l.;:a. __.' .._..,.5_C=a,.A,L.JTNLJ,,ll.:OO::;.JIL-=l=C....___,C,__,.,,t;ti.r.;1Au;::A.=<,. ..... 1➔_.__ __ _ 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE .1\1UMBER OF APPLICM'T: ------------ 38 :l f ADAtv'.\5 -S.T, I 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBJ\ffITED: 6-/-81 II. -ENVIRONMENTAL "IMPACTS (EXPLI\NATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE 1\i'JSWERS ARE TO BE WRIITEN UNDER Section III -DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMEl\ffAL EVALUATION) 1. • ·Earth Wili the proposal have signi - ficar . .: results in: _ a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? • d. The destruction, covering or r..udification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site'? £. Changes in deposition OT ero- sion of beach sands, or changes jn siltation, deposition OT erosion which 1n..-iy modify the chonncl of a river or st.ream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? • ·yes -·Maybe -\ : .. ND 2 .. /" 2. Air: Will the proposal have sign~ic:&K results in: a: • Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, :roositure or temperature, or any • chau.ge in climate, either locally or regionally? 3~ Water: Will the proposal have sigi- ficant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ">ater move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? • b. Changes in absorption rates~ drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flpod waters? d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body?· e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface .water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters~ g. Change in the quantity of grnund waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, OT through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of wafer otherwise available for publi~ water supp~ies? • Yes ---' Maybe No .. .. ·Yes Marbe No 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi.;_ 1icant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants~(including. trees, shrubs, ,; grass, crops, microflora and _L aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered . 'I,. . species of plant~? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a . barrier to the normal replenish-·-·~ ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . .. 't.. 5 .. • ·Animal Life. Will the proposal have ficant results in: signi- a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or .--:1' micro fauna) ? __ ,, b. Reduction of the numbers • of • any unique, rare or endangered ·'f,.. species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or ·l movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 'A. 6. • 'Noise. Will the proposal signi~ Iicantly increase existing noise -\ . levels? 'i.. 7. • 'Light and-Glare. Will the pro- posal sig~ificantly produce new· light or glare? t,. 8. L·md Use. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of . f.. •' an area? • -~- --- 9. Natural Resources.. Will the pro- JX)Sal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset . conditions? 11. • Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, ·dist~ibution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional h .: ? OUS.:.ng. 13. • ·Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults in: • a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for·new parking? c, Impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d, Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move~ mcnt of people and/or goods? e, .Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f., Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ·-4- Yes • Maybe • No t.- ... ·'I.. .... : .. .. .. 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have a significant effect upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered goveTillllental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f; Other governmental services? 15.-. Ener~. Will the .:proposal have signiticant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? .b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? .,. . ..-16. ·utilities. Will the proposal have' significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas7 b .. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e, Storm wat~r drainage? f. Solid waste and disposnl7 17, • U..mmn Health. Will the proposal have signigicant· results in the creation • of ~my heal th haz~rd or potential health ha:ord (~xcluding mental hcalth)7 • -s-• • Yes Maybe No ,; -.-• -,.. ... -:/4 ':I,. .. i< • "'6 .. ·"'k. .. .. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in the cbstruc- ·tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an • aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will-the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . 20 .. Archeological/Hi~torical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, • structure, object or building? Yes Maybe No 21. ANALYZF VJABLE ALTER\!ATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) PHASED DEVELO~l1ENT OF THE PROJECT; b) AL1ERNATE SITE • -DESIGNS; c) ALTER\!ATE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE USES FOR Th'E SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SO}IB FUTURE TIME RATh'ER WA.l\l" NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. No ·6- .. ., .... ·22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) DOES TIIE PROJECT HAVE lliE POTEN-· TIAL TO DEGRADE 1HE QUALI1Y OF TI-IE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSI1Y IN 1HE ENVIRONMENT? b) OOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE TI-IE . POTEN- TIAI., TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO TI-IE DISADVAI'fl'AGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON 11-IE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE-. LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE . PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL IN10 lliE FUTURE. ) c) OOES nrn PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BUT CUMULATmLY CONSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TI\TO OR '.MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES • WHERE TI-IE IMPACT ON EAGI RE- SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, BUT WHERE Tiffi EFFECT OF Tiffi 'IUTAL OF TtIOSE IMPACTS ON TI-IE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE B\'VIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS 1\HICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE . EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EIIBER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION ·Yes Maybe No. )( 11,.,i._, ~~o~ l.MAM.iJ-. ~ 'Twi.·. ~ ·1 ~ <'1Ci'rt>1) ~cJA~-~.~~ ~• ./lo ~~·~a/1.t_-~. ~ rr-7· -7-.. I • •. f DISOJSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIQ~. (Continued) . ./· .. .. ' -· IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE COi'fl.PLETED . BY 11-IE PLANNING • DEPARTMENT). On the basis of this initial evaluation: :1:.... I find the proposed project COULD 110T have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there ~~11 not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. • J find the proposed project MAY have~ significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL L"lPACT REPORT • is required. • Date: •• ~.-~· 1;A1. . (/ . . • Signaie V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -9- .,. .. MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI 'APPLICANT 'CONQJRRENCE ·wrrn MITIGATING MEASURES TIUS IS TO CERT!IT 'IHAT I HAVE REVIEtvED TIIE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA- SURES AND CONCUR WIIB TI-IE ADDITION OP TI-IESE MEASURES TO 'IHE PROJECT. Date:· ------------Signature of Applicant -10-· .. . . _ .. ,. . l $100.00 RECEIPT NO: ----- • ·ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENr FORM -Part I (To ~e Completed by APPLICANf) • CASE NO:· ------ DATE: • t,•/ · eJI . . Applicant: • sr. ,qi-~~ c;,JrTflOL.,/t; {;;lfll,l?C/f Address of Applicant: ~/ ~ 'BT 1 • c,f.P~, • Q4 ~ Phone Number: 011-) • 7f?ff-~~ Name, address and phone nlUilber of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): ..A;wA/ ,P-~/~. J NU e«m-/ I ~~ ~,; ~ 72!f·l'fl1'f "GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: CWLI..J=l?# ~7Vtf2f' AHO ·llfP#J~. . . . . avEL-OPMElvT Or ~7T21tY./ WAU:;-• 7r/PcL.ltrl SPE Project Location/Address:· JVOPT/IWEf5T ~8£ OF -i')tM~ ji • A-PMtP I 8eP-f ·A@4M6 i3r., c~, CA-· 9~ r . Assessor Parcel Nl.Illlber: ~5 .:. -~10-·-oq,, 4-!.tf4£.. Zone of Subject Property: P.·/ ------------------------- Proposed Use of Site: Clftl/2C,ff ~V,4:?t?.5 W/TH#\I '71/e ~ . . . 5T/2t./2T(.IA;?E ,t\/0 ~ OAI 5ITl#' ,91/Z#,_wS/4 ........ if? ___ _ List all other applicable applications related to this project: ------ . . ND 1 ' EIR 1 \ . ) 2. Describe the ~ctivity area, inciuding distinguishing ·. natural and-.mamr,ade charact2ristics; also provide precise _slof.se ana.lysis ·.when appropriate. ~"/lNb ~ /& a:z::t/REO 13Y A pe:5/ar,/Tl~ GTj?ttC7[,//28 i71Ar WiU £e ~-t!W'87llf./G h4V~ WIU e£' /2&:M£)/IED o,2-, ~lfl~V R:il/lSt::V. PJ!OR>5@ /?t./lWIN& I&· A ltJt/Gt: CJF. W()_/201/P W/Tlt Atz~ ~ /WO A ,MA)/MUM act/~ ~P AffX. 7@-em .. • ~771/ITY WflL... ~.m1Ji4/JFf«,~ A-~~-~ffAf6~EijP¥fr&.~w~At-3. ~~ne ener&y conser~on measures incorporated into (Ol,f:.12) the design .. and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discu£s ion ··of· energy conservation requirements see . of the City's EIR Guideli11·es). .. ·, -me ~ (5Jt" tHe~ a:t~H& A-NP. ~77t?N or • • • Jl,l,,t7E.li!/At-6 WIL..t.. ea-.a:we /# 6(./q," A. Vvff Y. m 'T,;f--j::;e /IP~~ CF'~.·~ ·~H~/~N~ 0,q:?::P7Z/#/T/~ I# APPh.7t7N W W~ ~ll+JtON .Al~ .•• ·4. • If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. . . 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square,foota9e of sales area, L~d loading facilities . .NA-- :-6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employm~nt per shif~, and Joadi~g ~acilities. N+ I;f i11sti tutional, indicate the major function, estimated employreent per shift, estimated. occupancy, loading facilities, and community benef'its to };>e derived from the project. . ·• Af,A..ICJe.: Ft/At;;r;CJA!: CHLIPC# ~p-~v~ $T. a-t PWYMEa'T: NA- /:6T, act/p,..+vc;y : . . L.a4-0I.N6 P/tOIWTle6 1 /Vk: : . . C£MNUNITY i3eNeFIT'S: A lfkN~e' !YEW~. enzttcn/Jl& ~ r,4C/t-/Tle5 ri:JlZ-•Clt'tl~ (),2/6.N71(3P COM~Wl7Y.' ... Wa.L. ee-/la..t:> IN T7te £3XIST7A/G CHt.J/2CI-I &//U¥N6 70 $6 ;Vo...er1t. ~ 70~ ~R£. WW#~ APM/5 AP~-4ff./ll 7llt: Pl/2Sr '25 ff A#O ~-(t' ff. {)l/l312-1i'7E PeHA-/A/£:62 Or 17/e S//e. • • . . · .• j • I•· ENVIRONMJ~NTAL ·IMPACT. 1\Nl'1.LYSIS . . Answer the following que·stions by placing a check in the appropriat'e space. (Discuss all. items ·checked yes. Attach additional sheets· as necef?Sary) ..• 2) Could the project significantly change present ·1and uses i!l the vi!?inity of th;e. activity? Could th¢ activity affect the use of a rec-. reational area,· or area. of important ~esthetic value? . .,_ 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an.established community or neighborhood?· 4) Could the activity result in the qisplacement of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low •and modera~e cost housing units in the city? .. 6) Could the activity decrease the'number .of low and modest cost housing units in the ci~y? .7) 8} 9) Are any of the natural or man-made 'features in the activity area uni.quG, that ~s, not: found in other ~arts of the County, State,· or Nation? Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or.its settings? • Could the activity significantly affect th~ potential use, extraction, or conservation .of a scarce-natural resource? •• lO)· Does. the activity area serve as a habitat,· food source nesting place, source'of water, etc. for rare or endangered·wildJife on fish ··species? 11) ·could·the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife o~ plant life? ·12). ll) . . ~re there any rare or endan9e~ed plant ·species in thq activity area?· • . . Could the activity change existing features -of any of the· city's lagoons, bays, or • • tidelands? YES NO -· . . ✓ --- . . . . .. . 14) • .. Could the activity change existing feature.s of any of the ci-t;,y's beaches? ·1s) Could· the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural land~? 16)· Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify development of already developed areas? .. . • 17l Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, ~ater, noise, etc)? 1.8) ·will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any . ~ .local, state er federal environmental-· control agency? ... 1~) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit" by the city? .. 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal bf potentially hazardous materials? 21) .Will the activity involve construction of tacilities in a flood .plain? •• 22) Will the activity invclve construct·ion of. facilities on a slope of 25 -pe~cent or greater? 23) . 25) Will the activity involve construction of·. facilities in the area of an active fault? Could the act1vity result in the generation of s~gnificant amounts of :Qoise?, Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? • • • 26) Will the activity involve the burning of br·ush, tree~, or other materials? • 27) Could the activity result in a.significant change in the quality of any portion o-f the . region's air or water resource~? (Should ·note, surface, ground water, off-shore). 28) Will the prpject substantially increase fuel consumpt.ion (electricity, oil,_ natural gas, etc.)? • 29) Will there be a.significant ch:.angc to existing land form? • -✓ . •.: ✓ ✓ -✓ ✓·· ✓-- ✓ ✓ --✓ .. . ' ··✓• . ' • 3,0) 31) (a) (b) (c) • ' indicate ·estimated grading to be done in cu~ic yards f ~ '/;e& • percentage of ·:iteration to the .. present land form . /tJ/p_ ()/2-~ . • • maximum height of.cut or fill/slopes 8 et &tX--MA:~> • • Will the activity result in.substantial increases in _the use· of utili tics, . sewers., . drains, or streets? I • .Is the activity carried· out as part of a iarger· ✓ • projec( or series of projects? ••• • • • • .. . . ··5- r ,# I . ' . II. STATEMENT OF NON-BIGNIFICANT 'ENVIRONMENTAL EFFEC'IS • If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: /'1. NtJV-&YIII.PCiYMevTAt-(j)t/e5'JQ¥ . Bl. 77-116 HlOJeur P.J?t'JR:JeBG JV (2£?~ ave OftlPCII 6~7Z/Pe'° Wint ANO?H~-~ ~Ae ~ ANO e?Pt/C,Tl/"2£:7 ,Ai?8' LE7l!?/2,0PA1'7#6. me ~ t£ll?tl07V/26 ·W/LL-eG' c;w-A;¥ A-VP ;we ~;YPS ·WlU-,ICcPT.' ;Qt&F fli!a/t;q' /#~~ NO EWU.POYMBNl?faY ~/T/1/e. ~ O,JZ- AMMA'L-lf,AB/~. #0 ,ex10J#e l'&Y6 W/t:t:.-. @ OBG~ III~ C(M.IBNTS OR ELABORATIONS 'TO ANY ·op ·nm 'QUESTIONS • IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Date Signed • • lR f ·8 / 8/. 7118 ,cpoJe:;;r IS ,9VZT CJ? A ~~ FPa.,/el7/' 0/4£.V .Q\./ n3/e ~~ 7?/'A-T IT /6 . A'NCJ771ee Cltt//?0/i f26Z:.A'7eP G~,Re=' ON Clttl/2Clf t7W/Vqi1 .,.-fa/~ ~- Ir 1e; ;Vor A-mASe t:Jr" A-~ rPe-,P~AIBD £i'.7jfe;ife. NO COV6~t7# ~t?;VO 17#6 ~et:Y /6 P~/VNGO ~T tlfb 77/We?: · I . ' I ! • I ' 1 ' ' I I I ' ' l I l • ' ' ' ' ! I I l . I ' ' -• ' ' j -F- ' ' I I ' ' I ! • • f 1--- l I ) I l I l +- • i : ' ! I i ' ' ' ' ! I r I i I I I I I ' l I i ' i ' ! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ------I ' I I I ( I ' ! i ! I I ' I ' I ( ' ' ,. l~~ I s;l,...........:::r i,f-.O' I I I I I t-----+l---- ~M.r,+lj ~k _;:;r t..e,,le,L.,. 1+,o' - ---........ ------~.,_,__y--~ ' ' -, C,.· -! I ~ " ~or.:.-rµ t 15 ; l tthilr ' ' John P. Landry Inc. aun """ .. 11 s,, .. t c.r10H. C•mo,1t1■ uoo■ 714/TD-ii$74 ' ~~-=:,c-1-juRc,f-\ • ' City of c.,,1,,,1 l'larming C,;-At1' ~i5!iion ~<=.Efr-rls'i·<.Ks .. f' ' H .;c:up-;i.07 Co.is-No. .V.: .. ::5-.:t1- r~t •' ""'.~-~ .\ ;, ', -