HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 2022-0003; FPC RESIDENTIAL; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS - RETAINING WALLS; 2023-12-12
1401 Dove Street, Suite 520 | Newport Beach, CA | 92660
949.502.5323 [Direct] | www.morengineers.com
Date: December 12, 2023
Project: Structural engineering for the Ponto - Landscape project in
the City of Carlsbad, CA.
Subject: Landscape Plan Check #1 Structural calculations.
Code: 2022 California Building Code
Engineer of: Kyle Morris
Record
Notice: The content of these documents is understood to be an
expression of professional opinion. It is based on our best
knowledge, information and belief. No guarantee or
warranty is expressed or implied.
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONALSHOP DRAWING REVIEW
Proj No Shop Dwg. No139000 Ocean Condominiums 4th
Date By10/05/2020 ARL/CS
MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED
REVISE AND RESUBMITREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTED
Review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project
and general compliance with the information included in this Contract Document(s). Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the drawings and specificatons. Contractor is responsible for: construction, coordination of
his/her work with that of other trades, and performing the work in a safe and satisfactory manner.
NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN
SUBMIT SPECIFIED ITEM
161440
10/16/2023 ARL/CS
FPC Residential Struc Review #1
4
4
01-08-2024
320
Table Of Contents
Section Page #
Wind Speed Design Load 3
Retaining Wall Calculations 4
Project:Ponto Wind Calc Date:
Description:Freestanding Sign Wind Loads (ASCE 7-16: Sect. 29.3)
General Wind Info:
Exposure:C Sect 26.7.3
G:0.85 Sect 26.11.1
K,zt:1.00 Sect 26.8.2
K,d 0.85 Sect 26.6 (Use Table 26.6-1)
K,e:1.00 Table 26.9-1
Occupancy Category:II Table 1.5-1
V (mph):96 Sect 26.5
Reduction (%):0%Sect 6.2.1 (ASCE 37-14)
V' (mph): 96.0 =V*((100-%Reduction)/100)
Wind Pressure, p (Section 29.3.1):
A 10.00 0.85 17.05 1.45 21.01
B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
E 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Description:
A …
B …
C …
D …
E …
Notes:
1. Kz is per Table 26.10-1
2. q is per Equation 26.10-1
3. Strength = Unfactored, Service = Factored (ASD; 0.6)
4. Cf is per Figure 29.3-1
5. A = Area (ft^2), F = Force (#), d = Moment Arm from Base (ft), M = Moment (#*ft)
1401 Dove Street, Suite 520, Newport Beach, CA 92660 | (949) 502 - 5323 | kyle@morengineers.com
Roof
Ht (ft)Kz q (psf)
Strength Cf p (psf)
StrengthSurface
Wind on Walls
3
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
2.50
10.00
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
4
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =2.13
Global Stability =3.59
OK
Sliding =1.75 OK
Total Bearing Load =1,403 lbs...resultant ecc.=6.90 in
Eccentricity within middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =740 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =5 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,036 psfACI Factored @ Heel =8 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =0.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =3.5 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =371.0 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
491.2
156.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 3rd 2nd
Stem OKStem OK
Bottom
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =8.00ft 2.50 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry Masonry
Thickness =6.00 8.00
Rebar Size =##4 4
Rebar Spacing =8.00 8.00
Rebar Placed at =Center EdgeDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.832 0.483
Total Force @ Section
=56.7 126.0lbs 251.0
Moment....Actual
=127.6 630.0 1,049.2ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =756.8 2,168.6ft-#
=1.9 2.7psi
Shear.....Allowable =43.6 43.7
Wall Weight =0.0psf 0.0
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 2.81 5.25
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psi 1,500Fs=psi 20,000 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48 21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=5.63 7.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDASD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Anet (Masonry)=67.50 91.50in2
5
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
0.00
3.50
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
0.00
0.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
3.50=
Cover @ Top =2.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
No key defined
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
=None Spec'd
==
=
==
1,0360
0
0
0.000.00
Heel:
81,144
2,738
1,594
3.5475.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
0.91
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 8,563=
OKOK
Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
6
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
126.0 8.50 1,071.0
=
=
=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
525.0 1.75 918.8
Key Weight
=
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=1,356.8
Vert. Component 99.3 3.50 347.4
Total
=
1,403.4 2,889.4
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=371.0 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =2.13
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =1,403.4 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
779.2 2.08
2.08
1,623.3
1,623.3
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
245.0 1.17 285.8
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.073 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
7
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: 2nd
Stem Design Height: 2.50 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 10565.44 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 9088.66 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.1344 in2/ft
8
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
9
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
10
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
4.00
6.00
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
11
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =3.34
Global Stability =2.95
OK
Sliding =1.56 OK
Total Bearing Load =2,122 lbs...resultant ecc.=1.41 in
Eccentricity within middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =608 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =415 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =852 psfACI Factored @ Heel =581 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =0.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =3.6 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =575.6 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
742.6
156.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 2nd Bottom
Stem OK
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =4.00ft 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry
Thickness =8.00
Rebar Size =#4
Rebar Spacing =8.00
Rebar Placed at =CenterDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.753
Total Force @ Section
=75.6 395.6lbs
Moment....Actual
=226.8 955.9ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =1,268.9ft-#
=4.3psi
Shear.....Allowable =44.5
Wall Weight =0.0psf
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 3.81
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psiFs=psi 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=7.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDSD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Anet (Masonry)=91.50in2
12
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
0.00
3.75
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
0.00
0.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
3.75=
Cover @ Top =3.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
No key defined
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
=None Spec'd
==
=
==
8520
0
0
0.000.00
Heel:
5813,116
4,729
1,613
3.6575.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
0.97
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 7,663=
OKOK
Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
13
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
75.6 8.00 604.8
=
=
=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
562.5 1.88 1,054.7
Key Weight
=
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=1,438.1
Vert. Component 202.6 3.75 759.6
Total
=
2,121.7 4,810.3
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=575.6 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =3.34
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =2,121.7 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
1,356.7 2.21
2.21
2,996.0
2,996.0
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
500.0 1.67 833.3
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.045 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
14
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 11608.66 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.1696 in2/ft
15
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
16
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Prop Side 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
17
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
4.00
6.00
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
18
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =1.83
Global Stability =2.04
OK
Sliding =1.98 OK
Total Bearing Load =1,380 lbs...resultant ecc.=5.80 in
Eccentricity within middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =772 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =13 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,080 psfACI Factored @ Heel =19 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =6.9 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =8.7 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =575.6 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
483.0
656.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 2nd Bottom
Stem OK
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =4.00ft 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry
Thickness =8.00
Rebar Size =#4
Rebar Spacing =8.00
Rebar Placed at =CenterDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.753
Total Force @ Section
=75.6 395.6lbs
Moment....Actual
=226.8 955.9ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =1,268.9ft-#
=4.3psi
Shear.....Allowable =44.5
Wall Weight =0.0psf
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 3.81
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psiFs=psi 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=7.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDSD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Anet (Masonry)=91.50in2
19
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
1.17
1.83
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
12.00
12.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
3.00=
Cover @ Top =3.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 18 in, #7@ 18
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
=# 4 @ 8.00 in
==
=
==
1,080642
215
426
6.9375.00
Heel:
19106
998
891
8.7075.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
0.78
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 7,6637,663=ft-#
OKOK
20
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
75.6 8.00 604.8
=
=
64.2 0.58 37.4=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
450.0 1.50 675.0
Key Weight
=
150.0 0.50 75.0
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=1,438.1
Vert. Component 202.6 3.00 607.7
Total
=
1,380.1 2,635.7
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=575.6 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =1.83
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =1,380.1 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
513.3 2.42
2.42
1,240.6
1,240.6
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
500.0 1.67 833.3
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.071 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
21
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 11608.66 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.1696 in2/ft
22
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
23
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 3.5' Equal 6.0' Fence
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
24
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
2.50
7.50
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
25
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =1.66
Global Stability =0.96
OK
Sliding =2.90 OK
Total Bearing Load =943 lbs...resultant ecc.=15.84 in
Eccentricity outside middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =924 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =0 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,294 psfACI Factored @ Heel =0 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =3.7 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =0.0 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =339.5 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
329.9
656.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 2nd Bottom
Stem OK
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =5.50ft 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry
Thickness =6.00
Rebar Size =#4
Rebar Spacing =8.00
Rebar Placed at =CenterDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.918
Total Force @ Section
=56.7 219.5lbs
Moment....Actual
=127.6 694.8ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =756.8ft-#
=3.3psi
Shear.....Allowable =44.2
Wall Weight =0.0psf
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 2.81
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psiFs=psi 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=5.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDSD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
NOT considered in the calculation of soil bearing
Anet (Masonry)=67.50in2
26
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
3.50
0.50
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
12.00
12.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
4.00=
Cover @ Top =2.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 18 in, #7@ 18
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
Flush heel condition. No reinforcing required.
=# 4 @ 8.00 in
==
=
==
1,2943,721
1,614
2,107
3.7475.00
Heel:
00
0
0
0.000.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
1.04
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 7,663=
OKOK
Flush heel condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
27
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
94.5 7.25 685.1
=
=
192.5 1.75 336.9=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
600.0 2.00 1,200.0
Key Weight
=
150.0 0.50 75.0
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=971.0
Vert. Component
Total
=
942.5 1,611.9
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=339.5 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =1.66
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =942.5 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
245.0 1.17 285.8
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.064 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
28
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 11652.03 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.1680 in2/ft
29
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
30
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Opp Side 3.5 CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
31
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
2.50
7.50
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
32
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =1.93
Global Stability =3.41
OK
Sliding =1.63 OK
Total Bearing Load =1,138 lbs...resultant ecc.=8.43 in
Eccentricity outside middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =951 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =0 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,331 psfACI Factored @ Heel =0 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =0.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =2.4 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =339.5 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
398.1
156.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 2nd Bottom
Stem OK
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =5.50ft 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry
Thickness =6.00
Rebar Size =#4
Rebar Spacing =8.00
Rebar Placed at =EdgeDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.918
Total Force @ Section
=56.7 219.5lbs
Moment....Actual
=127.6 694.8ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =756.8ft-#
=3.3psi
Shear.....Allowable =44.2
Wall Weight =0.0psf
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 2.81
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psiFs=psi 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=5.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDSD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
NOT considered in the calculation of soil bearing
Anet (Masonry)=67.50in2
33
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
0.00
3.00
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
0.00
0.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
3.00=
Cover @ Top =2.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
No key defined
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
=None Spec'd
==
=
==
1,3310
0
0
0.000.00
Heel:
0629
1,753
1,125
2.4475.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
0.78
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 8,563=
OKOK
Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
34
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
94.5 7.25 685.1
=
=
=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
450.0 1.50 675.0
Key Weight
=
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=971.0
Vert. Component
Total
=
1,137.5 1,878.1
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=339.5 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =1.93
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =1,137.5 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
687.5 1.75
1.75
1,203.1
1,203.1
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
245.0 1.17 285.8
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.088 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
35
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 11652.03 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =12.00 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.1680 in2/ft
36
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
37
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 3.5' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
38
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
4.50
9.00
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0 #/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf21.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
39
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =1.58
Global Stability =1.01
OK
Sliding =1.57 OK
Total Bearing Load =1,343 lbs...resultant ecc.=24.27 in
Eccentricity outside middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =917 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =0 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,284 psfACI Factored @ Heel =0 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =4.4 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =0.0 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =718.4 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
469.9
656.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 3rd 2nd
Stem OKStem OK
Bottom
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =9.50ft 4.50 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry Masonry
Thickness =6.00 8.00
Rebar Size =##4 5
Rebar Spacing =16.00 16.00
Rebar Placed at =Center EdgeDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =0.839 0.898
Total Force @ Section
=50.4 113.4lbs 518.4
Moment....Actual
=100.8 510.3 1,628.1ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =608.0 1,812.8ft-#
=1.7 5.7psi
Shear.....Allowable =43.6 43.8
Wall Weight =0.0psf 0.0
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 2.81 5.25
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psi 1,500Fs=psi 20,000 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48 21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=5.63 7.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load FactorsBuilding Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDASD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
NOT considered in the calculation of soil bearing
Anet (Masonry)=67.50 91.50in2
40
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
5.33
0.67
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
12.00
12.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
6.00=
Cover @ Top =2.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 18 in, #7@ 18
Factored PressureMu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way ShearAllow 1-Way Shear
Toe:#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
Flush heel condition. No reinforcing required.
=# 4 @ 8.00 in
==
=
==
1,2848,185
3,713
4,472
4.4275.00
Heel:
00
0
0
0.000.00
HeelToe
psfft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psipsi
Heel Reinforcing =
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
1.55
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 7,663=
OKOK
Flush heel condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
41
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
113.4 10.00 1,134.0
=
=
293.2 2.67 781.2=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
899.5 3.00 2,697.0
Key Weight
=
150.0 0.50 75.0
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=2,243.2
Vert. Component
Total
=
1,342.7 3,553.2
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=718.4 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =1.58
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =1,342.7 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in
the calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
605.0 1.83 1,109.2
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.057 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
42
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: 2nd
Stem Design Height: 4.50 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 16443.53 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =24.67 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =24.67 in
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 17962.13 psi
Lap Splice length for #5 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =33.68 in
Development length for #5 bar specified in this stem design segment =33.68 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #5 bar specified in this stem design segment =5.51 in
As Provided =0.2325 in2/ft
As Required =0.2095 in2/ft
43
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
44
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 4' Opp Side 5' CMU
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
45
N
C
T
D
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
AVENID
A
P
O
N
T
O
R
D
P
O
N
T
O
D
R
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
B
L
V
D
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
PO
N
T
O
R
D
SAN LUIS ST
EN
C
I
N
A
S
GRADING NOTES
(IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE.)
1. THIS PLAN SUPERSEDES ALL OTHER PLANS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
REGARDING GRADING SHOWN ON THIS SET OF PLANS.
2. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT LESSEN OR WAIVE ANY PORTION OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE, RESOLUTION OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, CITY STANDARDS OR OTHER
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS LISTED HEREON AS THEY MAY PERTAIN TO THIS PROJECT. THE
ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL REVISE THESE PLANS WHEN NON-CONFORMANCE IS
DISCOVERED.
3. CITY APPROVAL OF PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER OR ENGINEER-OF- WORK FROM
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING
CONSTRUCTION. ALL PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR
APPROVAL.
4. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FROM THE CITY ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, A CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE AS WELL AS
ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT MUST BE FILED NAMING THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AS AN
ADDITIONAL INSURED ON THE PERMITTEE'S POLICY IN THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000,000.00 FOR
EACH OCCURRANCE OF LIABILITY. THE INSURANCE COMPANY WRITING THE POLICY MUST HAVE A
RATING OF "A-" OR BETTER AND A SIZE CATEGORY OF CLASS VII OR BETTER AS ESTABLISHED BY
"BESTS" KEY RATING GUIDE.
5. NO WORK SHALL BE COMMENCED UNTIL ALL PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE CITY AND
OTHER APPROPRIATE AGENCIES.
6. REVISION OF THESE PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT
CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE DATE OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT.
7. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEER DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK OR GRADING
TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE PROPERTY OWNER'S PERMISSION HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND A VALID
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.
8. NO REVISIONS WILL BE MADE TO THESE PLANS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, NOTED WITHIN THE REVISION BLOCK, ON THE APPROPRIATE SHEET OF THE PLANS AND
THE TITLE SHEET.
9. ORIGINAL DRAWINGS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CITY UPON BEING SIGNED BY THE CITY
ENGINEER.
10. THE ORIGINAL DRAWING SHALL BE REVISED TO REFLECT AS-BUILT CONDITIONS BY THE
ENGINEER-OF-WORK PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE CITY.
11.ACCESS FOR FIRE AND OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE PROJECT SITE
AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
12. WHERE TRENCHES ARE WITHIN CITY EASEMENTS, A SOILS REPORT COMPRISED OF: (A) SUMMARY
SHEET, (B) LABORATORY WORK SHEETS AND (C) COMPACTION CURVES, SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRINCIPALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE
FIELD OF APPLIED SOILS MECHANICS. THE SOILS REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS OF THE COMPLETION OF FIELD TESTS.
13. A SOILS COMPACTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION REGARDING ADHERENCE TO
RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE SOILS REPORT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT. ALL CONTROLLED GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PRINCIPALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE
FIELD OF APPLIED SOILS MECHANICS. ALL FILL OR FUTURE FILL AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE "EARTHWORK
SPECIFICATIONS " ATTACHED TO THE PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION. DAILY FIELD COMPACTION
REPORTS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PROJECT INSPECTOR.
14. A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE HELD PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK AND SHALL BE
ATTENDED BY ALL REPRESENTATIVES RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION, SUPERVISION,
TESTING AND ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE CONTACTED BY THE
PROJECT INSPECTOR TO COORDINATE A DATE AND TIME FOR THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING.
APPROVED DRAWINGS MUST BE AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SCHEDULING. THE GRADING PERMIT WILL BE
PROVIDED BY THE PROJECT INSPECTOR AT THE MEETING.
15. ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS OTHER THAN FOR PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING WILL BE MADE BY CALLING
THE ENGINEERING 24-HOUR INSPECTION REQUEST LINE AT (760) 438-3891. INSPECTION REQUEST MUST
BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 2:00 P.M. ON THE WORKING DAY BEFORE THE INSPECTION IS NEEDED.
INSPECTIONS WILL BE MADE THE NEXT WORK DAY UNLESS YOU REQUEST OTHERWISE. REQUESTS MADE
AFTER 2:00 P.M. WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR TWO FULL WORK DAYS LATER.
16. THE OWNER AND/OR APPLICANT THROUGH THE DEVELOPER AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, INCLUDING SHORING, AND SHALL BE SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS,
LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO LABOR CODE SECTION 6705 BY SUBMITTING A DETAIL PLAN TO
THE CITY ENGINEER AND/OR CONCERNED AGENCY SHOWING THE DESIGN OF SHORING, BRACING
SLOPING OR OTHER PROVISIONS TO BE MADE OF WORKER PROTECTION FROM THE HAZARD OF
CAVING GROUND DURING THE EXCAVATION OF SUCH TRENCH OR TRENCHES OR DURING THE PIPE
INSTALLATION THEREIN. THIS PLAN MUST BE PREPARED FOR ALL TRENCHES FIVE FEET (5') OR MORE
IN DEPTH AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND/OR CONCERNED AGENCY PRIOR TO
EXCAVATION. IF THE PLAN VARIES FROM THE SHORING SYSTEM STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS, TITLE 8 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE PLAN SHALL
BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. IF THE PLAN VARIES
FROM THE SHORING SYSTEM STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS, TITLE
8 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER AT
THE CONTRACTERS EXPENSE. A COPY OF THE OSHA EXCAVATION PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO
THE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.
19. IF ANY ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED WITHIN ANY WORK AREA DURING
CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS WILL CEASE IMMEDIATELY, AND THE PERMITTEE WILL NOTIFY THE
CITY ENGINEER. OPERATIONS WILL NOT RESTART UNTIL THE PERMITTEE HAS RECEIVED WRITTEN
AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY ENGINEER TO DO SO.
20. ALL OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE SITE OR ADJACENT THERETO, INCLUDING WARMING UP,
REPAIR, ARRIVAL, DEPARTURE OR OPERATION OF TRUCKS, EARTHMOVING EQUIPMENT,
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED GRADING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED
TO THE PERIOD BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 6:00 P.M. EACH DAY, MONDAY THRU FRIDAY AND NO
EARTHMOVING OR GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS. (A
LIST OF CITY HOLIDAYS IS AVAILABLE AT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COUNTER.)
21. ALL OFF-SITE HAUL ROUTES SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE CITY INSPECTOR
FOR APPROVAL TWO FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DEBRIS OR DAMAGE OCCURRING ALONG THE HAUL ROUTE OR ADJACENT
STREETS AS A RESULT OF THE GRADING OPERATION.
23. BRUSH SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY WITHIN THE AREA TO BE GRADED. NO TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE PLAN.
24. ALL AREAS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN. GRADING RESULTING IN THE PONDING OF WATER IS NOT
PERMITTED. ALL EARTHEN SWALES AND DITCHES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM ONE PERCENT SLOPE.
25. THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO A SIGNED AND APPROVED SWPPP AND/OR SET OF EROSION CONTROL
PLANS. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT INSPECTOR.
26. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE TRIMMED TO A FINISH GRADE TO PRODUCE A UNIFORM SURFACE AND CROSS
SECTION. THE SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY CONDITION. ALL STONES, ROOTS OR
OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF AT A SITE APPROVED OF BY THE CITY
ENGINEER.
27. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE IRRIGATED, STABILIZED, PLANTED AND/OR HYDROSEEDED WITHIN TEN (10)
DAYS OF THE TIME WHEN EACH SLOPE IS BROUGHT TO GRADE AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
GRADING PLANS.
22. IMPORT MATERIAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM, AND WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DEPOSITED AT, A
SITE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DEBRIS OR DAMAGE OCCURRING ALONG THE HAUL ROUTES OR ADJACENT STREETS AS A RESULT
OF THE GRADING OPERATION.
18. NO BLASTING SHALL BE PERFORMED UNTIL A VALID BLASTING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. SUBMIT APPLICATION FOR BLASTING PERMIT WELL IN ADVANCE OF THE
SCHEDULING OF BLASTING OPERATIONS.
28.LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL SLOPES AND PADS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD LANDSCAPE MANUAL, THE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT, DRAWING NO.
AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR PLANNING DIRECTOR.
29. THE OWNER/APPLICANT SHALL INSURE THAT ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK OF
THESE GRADING PLANS WITH THAT SHOWN ON BOTH THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS AND THE
IMPROVEMENT PLANS AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE MANUAL
TIME REQUIREMENTS.
30.WHERE AN EXISTING PIPE LINE IS TO BE ABANDONED AS A RESULT OF THE GRADING OPERATION, IT
SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN TWENTY FEET OF BUILDING OR STREET AREAS AND REPLACED WITH
PROPERLY COMPACTED SOILS. IN OTHER AREAS THE PIPE WILL BE PLUGGED WITH CONCRETE OR
REMOVED AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
31. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UTILITY STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE , RECORDS. ATTENTION IS
CALLED TO THE POSSIBLE EXISTENCE OF OTHER UTILITY FACILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN
OR IN A LOCATION DIFFERENT FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO
TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND ANY
OTHER EXISTING FACILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN.
32. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING FACILITIES ( ABOVE GROUND AND
UNDER GROUND ) WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF GRADING TO PERMIT THE
REVISION OF THE GRADING PLANS IF IT IS FOUND THAT THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT
WITH THE PROPOSED WORK.
33. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES (SEE BELOW) AT LEAST 2 FULL
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING GRADING NEAR THEIR FACILITIES AND SHALL COORDINATE THE
WORK WITH A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE.
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800)422-4133
SDG&E (800)411-7343
AT&T (800)892-0123
TIME WARNER CABLE (760)438-7741
COX COMMUNICATIONS (619)262-1122
CITY OF CARLSBAD(STREETS & STORM DRAIN) (760)434-2980
CITY OF CARLSBAD(SEWER,WATER & RECLAIMED WATER) (760)438-2722
SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT (760)633-2650
LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT (760)753-0155
VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT (760)744-0460
OLIVENHAIN WATER DISTRICT (760)753-6466
BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT (760)726-1340 x1330
AS APPROPRIATE
34. PERMIT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS:
A. FOR CONTROLLED GRADING - THE APPLICANT HIRES A CIVIL ENGINEER, SOILS
ENGINEER, AND/OR GEOLOGIST TO GIVE TECHNICAL ADVICE, OBSERVE AND CONTROL
THE WORK IN PROGRESS {15.16.120 A.8} CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE.
B. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF A GRADING PERMIT - THE FOLLOWING REPORTS MUST
BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER VIA THE PROJECT INSPECTOR {15.16.120 A.10}
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE:
(1) FINAL REPORT BY SUPERVISING GRADING ENGINEER STATING ALL GRADING IS
COMPLETE. ALL EROSION CONTROL, SLOPE PLANTING AND IRRIGATION ARE
INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY CODE AND THE APPROVED PLANS (
OBTAIN SAMPLE OF COMPLIANCE LETTER FROM CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT).
(2) AS-BUILT GRADING PLAN.
(3) REPORT FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER, WHICH INCLUDES RECOMMENDED SOIL
BEARING CAPACITIES, A STATEMENT AS TO THE EXPANSIVE QUALITY OF THE
SOIL, AND SUMMARIES OF FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTS AND PLOTTED TEST
POINTS THE REPORT SHALL ALSO INCLUDE A STATEMENT BY THE SOILS
ENGINEER THAT THE GRADING WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS THERETO.
(4) REPORT WITH AS-BUILT GEOLOGIC PLAN, IF REQUIRED BY THE CITY.
35.UNLESS A GRADING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT IS ISSUED WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE CITY
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL, THESE PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE RESUBMITTED FOR PLANCHECK.
PLANCHECK FEES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY SUCH RECHECK.
35.IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STORM WATER STANDARDS, ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS CONSTRUCTED
BY THIS PLAN SHALL INCLUDE "STENCILS" BE ADDED TO PROHIBIT WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
DOWNSTREAM. STENCILS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.
"DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE"
I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, THAT I HAVE EXERCISED
RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS
AND PROFESSIONS CODE, AND THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
DOES NOT RELIEVE ME, AS ENGINEER OF WORK, OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN.
FIRM:
ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE:
TELEPHONE:
BY:
(NAME OF ENGINEER)
R.C.E. NO.:
REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE:
SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
SIGNED:
G.E./P.E. NO.:
DATE:
LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE:
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
I ( WE ) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER OR GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR WILL
BE RETAINED TO SUPERVISE OVER-ALL GRADING ACTIVITY AND ADVISE ON THE COMPACTION AND
STABILITY OF THIS SITE. IF THIS PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE-REGULATED SWPPP,
I (WE) ALSO AGREE A QUALIFIED SWPPP PRACTITIONER (QSP) HAS BEEN OR WILL BE RETAINED TO
SUPERVISE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION
ORDER AND MUNICIPAL PERMIT, LATEST VERSION.
RYLEY WEBB DATE
I, , A REGISTERED GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRINCIPALLY DOING
BUSINESS IN THE FIELD OF APPLIED SOILS MECHANICS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
A SAMPLING AND STUDY OF THE SOIL CONDITIONS PREVALENT WITHIN THIS
SITE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES OF
COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STUDY, WITH MY
RECOMMENDATIONS, HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER.
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY
TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WAS GENERATED BY
METHODS FROM INFORMATION GATHERED ON 11/11/2022.
TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON CONFORMS TO NATIONAL MAP
ACCURACY STANDARDS.
PROJECT LOCATION
THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S)
THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE INDEX OF THIS PROJECT IS:
N41°38'11"
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SHEET INDEX
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PROJECT ADDRESS
DEVELOPER
NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE NO.:
REFERENCE DRAWINGS
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
CUT:
FILL:
IMPORT:
EXPORT:
REMEDIAL:CY
CY
CY
CY
CY
BENCHMARK
DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION:
RECORDED:
ELEVATION:DATUM:NGVD 29
TOTAL LOT AREA =
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA =
(THIS AREA INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO OFF-SITE WORK
INCLUDING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND TEMPORARY
DISTURBANCE SUCH AS VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT STAGING
AREAS, CONSTRUCTION WORKER FOOT TRAFFIC, SOIL/GRAVEL
PILES, UTILITY TRENCHES, BACKFILL CUTS AND SLOPE
KEYWAYS)
TOTAL PROPOSED/REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 179,173 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA = 56,051 SF
WORK TO BE DONE
THE GRADING WORK SHALL CONSIST OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL CUTS AND FILLS, REMEDIAL GRADING,
DRAINAGE FACILITIES, EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES, AND PLANTING OF PERMANENT LANDSCAPING AND
PREPARATION OF AS-BUILT GRADING PLANS, AS-BUILT GEOLOGIC MAPS AND REPORTS, ALL AS SHOWN OR
REQUIRED ON THIS SET OF PLANS AND THE CITY STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS, REQUIREMENTS,
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES CITED ON THESE PLANS.
THE GRADING WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS,
CURRENT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
1. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE
2. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS
3. THIS SET OF PLANS
4. RESOLUTION NO.
5. THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (GREEN BOOK).
6. SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY
7. THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS AND AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD STANDARDS.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL DOCUMENTS:
9. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED
BY
WDID NO. 9 375
10. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED
BY
11. CALIFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY ASSOCIATION BMP CONSTRUCTION HANDBOOK AND CALTRANS
CONSTRUCTION SITE BMP MANUAL.
ABANDONMENT NOTES
PARTIALLY COMPLETED PROJECTS SEEKING TO INDEFINITELY STOP WORK AND CLOSE THE GRADING PERMIT
MUST IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE ACCESS RESTRICTION AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO
THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
1)PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL SLOPES (>5%) - 70% COVER WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED, SUSTAINABLE,
NON-WEED VEGETATION (SEE CITY LANDSCAPE MANUAL FOR (GUIDELINES) IS CONSIDERED ADEQUATE.
2)PERMANENTLY STABILIZE FLAT AREAS (≤5%) - 70% COVER WITH WELL-ESTABLISHED, SUSTAINABLE,
NON-WEED VEGETATION (SEE CITY LANDSCAPE MANUAL FOR GUIDELINES) OR 2 INCHES (MINIMUM) OF
PERMEABLE COVER (E.G., GRAVEL) IS CONSIDERED ADEQUATE.
3)RESTRICT ACCESS TO SITE - COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE FENCING TYPE.
4)SIGNAGE ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD(S) POSTING THAT DUMPING, LITTERING, AND TRESPASSING ARE
PROHIBITED.
5)TRESPASS ENFORCEMENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER MUST BE SENT FROM THE OWNER TO THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD POLICE DEPARTMENT.
6)NOTARIZE AND RECORD AGAINST THE PROPERTY AN AGREEMENT STATING THAT OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR MAINTAINING FENCING AND SIGNAGE, ADHERING TO THE FIRE PREVENTION ORDINATION, KEEPING
THE SITE FREE FROM LITTER ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH, AND REMOVING ANY ILLEGALLY
DUMPED MATERIALS AT THE SITE UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON BRASS DISK, "OC147 1968",
FOUND IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHBOUND HWY 101
BRIDGE OVER PONTO CREEK, AS SHOWN ON ROS 17271 AS BM-OC-147.
50.560
1,595
8,885
6,166
1.TITLE SHEET
2.KEY MAP & NOTES
03-04.SECTIONS & DETAILS
05-13.PRECISE GRADING PLAN
14-16.STORM DRAIN PLAN & PROFILES
17.BMP PLAN
18-19.BMP PLAN DETAILS
20-21.STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DETAILS
SEE SHEET 2
214-160-25; 214-160-28; 214-171-11
4.64 ACRES
DWG 337-9
DWG 468-3
DWG 499-2
7200, 7290, 7294 PONTO
DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92011
VICINITY MAP:
SCALE: 1" = 800'
1
H.G.FENTON COMPANY
7577 MISSION VALLEY RD.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
(619)400-0120
PLSA ENGINEERING
1911 SAN DIEGO AVE, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92110
(858)259-8212
TYLER G LAWSON
12/31/24
80356
JOHN J. DONOVAN
MARCH 16, 2022
PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES.
DATED
DATED
DATED SW NO.
DATED SW NO.
TITLE SHEET
ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS
INC (AGS)3/16/2022
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
214-160-28, 214-160-25, 214-171-11
ASSOCIATED PERMITS
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS 543-6
7,290
5.40 ACRES
*SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND, LEGAL
DESCRIPTION, & SPECIAL MITIGATION NOTES
7482 MAY 3,2023
RESOLUTION NO. 7482, DATED : MAY3, 2023
35.DEVELOPER SHALL AVOID AFFECTING NESTING BIRD SPECIES (RAPTORS, LISTED BIRD SPECIES, AND
MIGRATORY BIRDS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING CLEARING AND GRUBBING, DURING
THE BIRD BREEDING SEASON (FEBRUARY 15 TO AUGUST 31). IF THE BREEDING SEASON CAN=NT BE
AVOIDED, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN:
A.NO MORE THAN THREE (3) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY VEGETATION CLEARING OR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST SHALL CONDUCT A
PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY THROUGHOUT THE SITE TO IDENTIFY NESTS OR NESTING
BEHAVIOR. MONITORING SHALL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE BREEDING SEASON. IF
AN ACTIVE NEST IS OBSERVED, A PROTECTIVE BUFFER SHALL BE FENCED OFF, AND NO
WORK SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BUFFER UNTIL THE NEST IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
(E.G., ALL NESTLINGS HAVE SUCCESSFULLY FLEDGED). A BUFFER WIDTH OF AT LEAST
500 FEET SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR RAPTORS OR LISTED SPECIES SUCH AS COASTAL
CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER OR LEAST BELL'S VIREO. BUFFER WIDTH FOR OTHER
SPECIES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST, IN COORDINATION WITH
THE CITY AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES BASED ON SPECIES BIOLOGY AND SITE
CONDITIONS.
B.USFWS SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES THAT ARE
LOCATED DURING PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS.
C.A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST SHALL MONITOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DURING THE
BREEDING SEASON. NO ACTIVITIES THAT WOULD RESULT IN NOISE LEVELS EXCEEDING
60 DBA HOURLY LEQ WITHIN 500 FEET OF BREEDING HABITAT OCCUPIED BY LISTED
SPECIES. AMBIENT NOISE SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE 60 DBA CALCULATION. IF
EXCESS NOISE-PRODUCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT COMPLETED PRIOR
TO THE BREEDING SEASON, AND BIRDS ARE NESTING DURING THE BREEDING SEASON,
NOISE BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED TO REDUCE NOISE IMPACTS AT THE DISTANCE
OF THE NESTS TO BELOW 60 DBA HOURLY LEQ OR THE ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
SUSPENDED. THE NEST SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE MONITORING BIOLOGIST, AND
THE NOISE RESTRICTIONS SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE NOISE PRODUCING MACHINERY
WORK IS COMPLETED.
36.PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND BUILDING PERMITS, DEVELOPER SHALL LIST THE FOLLOWING ON
ALL CONSTRUCTION, GRADING AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS. DEVELOPER SHALL ADHERE TO THE
FOLLOWING MEASURES FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THE PROJECT:
A.THE PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL, TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE, SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO AVOID THE SIMULTANEOUS OPERATION OF
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SO AS TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS RESULTING FROM
OPERATING SEVERAL PIECES OF HIGH NOISE LEVEL EMITTING EQUIPMENT.
B.ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, FIXED OR MOBILE, SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH
PROPERLY OPERATING AND MAINTAINED MUFFLERS. ENFORCEMENT SHALL BE
ACCOMPLISHED BY RANDOM FIELD INSPECTIONS BY APPLICANT PERSONNEL DURING
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
C.CONSTRUCTION NOISE REDUCTION METHODS SUCH AS SHUTTING OFF IDLING
EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMPORARY NOISE BARRIER, LOCATING
STOCKPILING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT STAGING AREAS AS FAR AS
PRACTICABLE FROM ADJACENT RESIDENCES OR OTHER NOISE-SENSITIVE RECEPTORS,
AND USE OF ELECTRIC AIR COMPRESSORS AND SIMILAR POWER TOOLS, RATHER THAN
DIESEL EQUIPMENT, SHALL BE USED WHERE FEASIBLE.
D.DURING CONSTRUCTION, STATIONARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PLACED
SUCH THAT EMITTED NOISE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM OR SHIELDED FROM SENSITIVE
RECEPTORS.
E.CONSTRUCTION HOURS, ALLOWABLE WORKDAYS, AND THE PHONE NUMBER OF THE
JOB SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE CLEARLY POSTED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCES TO ALLOW SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS TO CONTACT THE JOB
SUPERINTENDENT IF NECESSARY. IN THE EVENT THE CITY OF CARLSBAD RECEIVES A
COMPLAINT, APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED, AND A
REPORT OF THE ACTION PROVIDED TO THE REPORTING PARTY.
F.TO COMPLY WITH SDAPCD RULE 55, FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL, THE ACTIVE GRADING
SITES SHALL BE WATERED AT LEAST TWO TIMES DAILY.
G.PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND ISSUANCE OF GRADING
PERMITS, THE PROJECT APPLICANT, OR ITS DESIGNEE, SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL 84
HORSEPOWER OR GREATER DIESEL-POWERED EQUIPMENT ARE POWERED WITH
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD (CARB)-CERTIFIED TIER 4 INTERIM ENGINES OR
BETTER, EXCEPT WHERE THE PROJECT APPLICANT ESTABLISHES TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD (CITY) THAT TIER 4 INTERIM EQUIPMENT IS
NOT AVAILABLE. AN EXEMPTION FROM THIS REQUIREMENT MAY BE GRANTED BY THE
CITY IF (1) THE CITY DOCUMENTS EQUIPMENT WITH TIER 4 INTERIM ENGINES ARE NOT
REASONABLY AVAILABLE, AND (2) THE REQUIRED CORRESPONDING REDUCTIONS IN
CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS CAN BE ACHIEVED FOR THE PROJECT FROM
OTHER COMBINATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. BEFORE AN EXEMPTION MAY
BE GRANTED, THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL: CONFIRM THAT THE
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN EVALUATED USING CALIFORNIA
EMISSIONS ESTIMATOR MODEL (CALEEMOD} OR OTHER INDUSTRY STANDARD
EMISSION ESTIMATION METHOD AND DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO THE CITY TO
CONFIRM THAT NECESSARY PROJECT-GENERATED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS ARE
ACHIEVED.
PLSA
PLSA
---
FPC RESIDENTIAL
CITY OF CARLSBAD
SDP2022-003/CDP2022-0023
(DEV2022-0048)/PCD2023-0001
(DEV2022-0048)
REVISION DESCRIPTION CITY APPROVAL
INITIALDATE
ENGINEER OF WORK
INITIALDATE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DRAWING NO.PROJECT NO.
CHKD BY:
DWN BY:
APPROVED:
DATE INITIAL
RVWD BY:
"AS BUILT"
DATE
INSPECTOR DATE
REVIEWED BY:
P.E.EXP.
1
ENGINEERING MANAGER RCE 63912 EXPIRES 9/30/24
JASON S. GELDERT
DATE
OTHER APPROVAL
SHEETSSHEET
GRADING PLANS FOR:
J:\ACTIVE JOBS\3754 FENTON-PONTO RD\CIVIL\DRAWING\GRADING PLANS
21
SDP 2022-0003
GR 2023-0029
543-6A
GRADING NOTES (CONTINUED)
GRADING NOTES (CONTINUED)
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SPECIAL MITIGATION NOTES
MP-40
TC-50 QUARTERLY
TC-12
TRASH CAPTURE
STORMTEK ST3
MODULAR
WETLAND
STREET
TREE
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
YES
YES
5-6,8-9,17-19
18-19 AS NEEDED
SEMI-ANNUALLY
& AS NEEDED
PRIVATE YES 15-16
GE 2790
06-30-25
PROJECT SITE
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
Proj No Shop Dwg. No139000 Ocean Condominiums 4th
Date By10/05/2020 ARL/CS
MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED
REVISE AND RESUBMITREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTED
Review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information included in this Contract Document(s). Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the drawings and specificatons. Contractor is responsible for: construction, coordination of his/her work with that of other trades, and performing the work in a safe and satisfactory manner.
NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN
SUBMIT SPECIFIED ITEM
161440
10/16/2023 ARL/CS
FPC Residential Struc Review #1
4
THE LATEST RETAINING WALL
DESIGN PARAMETERS ARE
LISTED IN THIS REPORT.
GENERAL NOTES
1.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND EACH SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS SHALL BE COMPARED TO THOSE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DISCREPANCY. DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE
OVER SCALES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
2.IF ANY CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS AND THE STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS, THE
MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN.
3.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, ELECTRICAL, AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF FLOORS, ROOFS, WALLS,
AND NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND CONFIGURATIONS AND OPENINGS IN THESE ELEMENTS AND LOCATIONS OF
TRENCHES, DEPRESSIONS, PIPES, EQUIPMENT, ETC. NOT SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.
4.GENERAL DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED WHEN CONDITIONS ARE NOT SHOWN
OTHERWISE. DETAILED NOTES AND DETAILED DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND GENERAL
DETAILS.
5.WHERE NO DETAILS OR NOTES ARE SHOWN, CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO SIMILAR WORK ON THE PROJECT AND
SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ACCEPTED TRADE STANDARDS.
6.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE STRUCTURAL NOTES, DETAILS, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS ALONG WITH
ASSOCIATED NOTES, DETAILS, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS.
7.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF THE 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ANY OTHER
AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL CITY, COUNTY, AND ANY OTHER REGULATING AGENCY HAVING AUTHORITY
OVER ANY PORTION OF WORK.
8.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS, STATE STATUTES, LOCAL ORDINANCES, AND THE
REGULATIONS OF AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR
COMPLYING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS AND THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ORDERS OF THE STATE
DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY, THE REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATIONS, AND SUCH OTHER AGENCIES GOVERNING THE CONTRACTOR'S ACTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR AND HOLD HARMLESS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR ANY DAMAGES AND PENALTIES OR BOTH
RESULTING FROM HIS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SAID LAWS, STATUTES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS.
9.THE DESIGN, ADEQUACY AND SAFETY OF ERECTION BRACING, SHORING, TEMPORARY SUPPORTS, ETC. IS THE SOLE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND HAS NOT BEEN CONSIDERED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STABILITY OF THE STRUCTURE PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF ALL SHEAR WALLS,
ROOF AND FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS AND FINISH MATERIALS. HE SHALL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY BRACING TO PROVIDE
STABILITY PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED MATERIALS. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY THE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR HIS DESIGNEE SHALL NOT INCLUDE INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE ITEMS.
10.CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE LOAD DOES NOT EXCEED THE DESIGNED LOAD IF THE
MATERIALS ARE TO BE PLACED ON FRAMED ROOF OR FLOORS.
11.NO SUBSTITUTIONS OR CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF
RECORD.
REINFORCING STEEL
1.ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE ASTM A 615 GRADE 40 FOR #3 BARS AND SMALLER. ALL REINFORCING BARS
SHALL BE ASTM A 615 GRADE 60 FOR #4 BARS AND LARGER. ALL BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED.
2. WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI/ASTM A 185, STEEL WELDED WIRE FABRIC, PLAIN, FOR CONCRETE
REINFORCEMENT.
3.BEND REINFORCING COLD UNLESS OTHERWISE ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.
4.SECURELY TIE ANCHOR BOLTS, REINFORCING STEEL, INSERTS, ETC. IN PLACE PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE OR
GROUT.
4. PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL NEED NOT BE INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR.
5.CONCRETE PROTECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE DIAMETER OF THE BARS. COVER
SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
A. CAST AGAINST EARTH 3"
B. CAST AGAINST FORM BELOW GRADE, #6 AND LARGER 2"
#5 AND SMALLER 1 1/2"
C. FORMED SLABS 1"
D. SLABS ON GRADE (FROM TOP OF SLAB)1"
E. COLUMNS AND BEAMS TO MAIN BARS 2"
F. WALLS - EXPOSED TO WEATHER 2"
NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER, #11 AND SMALLER 1"
#14 AND #18 1 1/2"
G. STRESSING TENDON 1 1/2"
INSPECTION PROGRAM:
1.STRUCTURAL INSPECTION:
THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DESIGNATED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL INSPECT ALL STRUCTURAL
ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE.
2.SPECIAL INSPECTION:
A REGISTERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL PROVIDE INSPECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION ON THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF WORK:
PORTION OF WORK REQUIRING INSPECTION CONTINUOUS PERIODIC DESCRIPTION, LOCATIONS, REMARKS, ETC. FIRM
A.THE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTION IS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC/ LABC SECTION 1704 AND
1705. INCLUDED ARE:
1.SCHEDULE OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND TEST APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT:
a.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS PER SECTIONS 1704 AND 1705
b.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE
c.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR WIND RESISTANCE
2.LIST OF TESTING AGENCIES AND OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTORS THAT WILL BE RETAINED TO CONDUCT THE TEST AND
INSPECTIONS.
B.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND SECTIONS 1704, 1705, 1707, AND 1708
C.THE SPECIAL INSPECTORS MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE APPROVING MUNICIPALITY TO PERFORM THE TYPES OF INSPECTION LISTED.
D.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR TO INFORM THE SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY PRIOR TO
PERFORMING THE WORK WHICH REQUIRES SPECIAL INSPECTION. ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT THE REQUIRED SPECIAL
INSPECTION IS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL.
E.EACH SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL OBSERVE THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR AND THE TAKING OF TEST SAMPLES FOR
CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. SPECIAL INSPECTORS SHALL KEEP RECORDS OF INSPECTIONS. THE
SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL FURNISH INSPECTION REPORTS TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, AND TO THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD.
REPORTS SHALL INDICATE THAT THE WORK INSPECTED WAS DONE IN CONFORMANCE TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR CORRECTION. IF
THE DISCREPANCIES ARE NOT CORRECTED, THE DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BUILDING
OFFICIAL AND THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THAT PHASE OF WORK. A FINAL REPORT
DOCUMENTING REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND CORRECTION OF ANY DISCREPANCIES NOTED IN THE SPECIAL
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT A POINT IN TIME AGREED UPON BY THE PERMIT APPLICANT AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK.
F.A CERTIFICATE OF SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF EACH PORTION OF WORK REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION MUST BE
COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND TO THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER-OF RECORD.
G.INSPECTIONS BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR DOS NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM ANY INSPECTIONS BY THE BUILDING
OFFICIAL.
CONCRETE ANCHORS
1.ANCHOR BOLTS, L-BOLTS, J-BOLTS, BARS, AND RODS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM F 1554. THREADS MAY BE CUT INTO
FULL SIZE BAR STOCK OR MAY BE ROLLED THREADS. WHEN GALVANIZING IS USED IT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A153.
2.SB AND SSTB ANCHOR BOLTS ARE SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY PRODUCTS (ICC ESR-2611/ LARR 25827).
3.SHOT-PINS SHALL BE HILTI COMPANY PRODUCTS (ICC ESR-2379/ LARR 25469).
4.CONCRETE SCREW ANCHORS (LARGE DIAMETER ANCHORS) SHALL BE TITEN HD, SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY
PRODUCTS (ICC ESR-2713/ LARR 25741). WHEN NOTED ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INSTALLATION SHALL BE
INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSPECTION PROGRAM.
5.ADHESIVE ANCHORS (CHEMICAL ANCHORS) SHALL BE SET-XP EPOXY ADHESIVE, SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY
PRODUCTS (ICC ESR-2508/ LARR 25744). WHEN NOTED ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INSTALLATION SHALL BE
INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSPECTION PROGRAM.
6.INSTALLATION OF THE LISTED PRODUCTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
ALTERNATIVES MAY BE USED ONLY WITH SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, AND ONLY UPON
SUBMITTAL OF A LISTING OF HARDWARE TO BE SUBSTITUTED.
7.INSTALLATION OF ADHESIVE ANCHORS SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR. THE INSPECTOR
SHALL OBSERVE THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE ADHESIVE ANCHORS FOR
CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE ICC REPORT, THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, AND THE
APPLICABLE WORKMANSHIP PROVISIONS OF THE BUILDING CODE. INSPECTION OF WORK BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR
SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF ANY INSPECTIONS BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
SOILS INSPECTION
1.THE SOILS ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE
STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON IS FOLLOWED. THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR
OBSERVATION OF THE WORK BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.
2.THE SOILS ENGINEER OR INDIVIDUAL / FIRM DESIGNATED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL INSPECT AND DOCUMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT OR
CONCRETE. AS A MINIMUM, ALONG WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER OR BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE
FOLLOWING PORTIONS OF WORK REQUIRE SOILS INSPECTION:
A. EXCAVATIONS AND THE PLACEMENT OF FILL FOR BUILDING PAD CONSTRUCTION.
B. EXCAVATIONS FOR FOOTING CONSTRUCTION.
C. UTILITY TRENCHES ARE PROPERLY BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED.
D.DRILLED PILE HOLES.
E.PLACEMENT OF SUB-DRAIN PIPE OR WEEP HOLES.
F.PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL AND BACK-FILL BEHIND RETAINING WALLS.
3.THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTED INSPECTION REPORTS TO BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION AND TO THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SHOW CONFORMANCE WITH THE
SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS.
STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION
1.THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER-OF-RECORD OR HIS DESIGNEE SHALL PROVIDE PERIODIC VISUAL OBSERVATION OF
THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AT
SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION STAGES, AT COMPLETION OF THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM, AND UPON COMPLETION
OF ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE WORK OCCASIONED BY THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER'S VISITS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL CALL TO SCHEDULE THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER FOR VISITS THE PROJECT. THE CLIENT/OWNER OF THE
PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RETAINING AND REIMBURSING THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER.
ENGINEER-OF-RECORD KYLE MORRIS, P.E.
TELEPHONE (949) 502-5323
STAGE REQUIRING OBSERVATION:
A.BEFORE FOUNDATION POUR.
B.UPON COMPLETION OF FRAMING AND PRIOR TO INSULATION DRYWALL, EXTERIOR MATERIALS, OR
ROOFING.
C.UPON COMPLETION OF ANY THE WORK REFERENCED BY THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER'S VISITS.
WORK TO BE OBSERVED:
A.ELEMENTS OF THE WORK TO BE OBSERVED INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO:
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION, EXCAVATION CONFIGURATION, REINFORCEMENT, FASTENERS,
HARDWARE, DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION AND WORKMANSHIP.
B.ELEMENTS OF THE WORK TO BE OBSERVED INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO: ISSUES
PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED BY THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER IN PRIOR VISITS.
2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IF APPLICABLE. THE MEETING SHALL
INCLUDE THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER, THE CONTRACTOR, APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS, SPECIAL
INSPECTORS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WILL BE TO IDENTIFY ALL AREAS
REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS
3.AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE WORK INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT, THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVER WILL SUBMIT TO THE
BUILDING OFFICIAL A WRITTEN STATEMENT THAT THE SITE VISITS HAVE BEEN MADE AND OF HIS OBSERVATIONS
AND SPECIFICS AS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL NOT BE CALLED FOR
ANY INSPECTIONS UNTIL THE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE REQUIRED PORTIONS OF WORK HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED AND THE STATEMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED.
4.STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION DOES NOT WAIVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR FROM OBTAINING
OTHER REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. WORK MUST NOT BE COVERED UNTIL EACH PARTY IS ABLE TO MAKE
INSPECTIONS OR OBSERVATIONS.
5.STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS IS MADE ONLY TO ASSIST THE CONTRACTOR IN COMPLYING WITH THE INTENT OF THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER-OF-RECORD AN
OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A DETERMINATION IN HIS PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE WORK OBSERVED WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS. OBSERVATION OF THE WORK IS IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTEE; EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED THAT THE
WORK IS IN FACT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OR THE BUILDING CODE.
OBSERVATIONS OF THE WORK DO NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE QUALITY OF
THE WORK AND FOR ADHERING TO THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING
CODE.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA:
STRUCTURAL DESIGNS ARE BASED ON THE 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PER THE FOLLOWING DESIGN LOADS AND
PROCEDURES:
1.WIND DESIGN DATA:
BASIC WIND SPEED (3 SECOND GUST) 96 MILES PER HOUR
RISK OCCUPANCY CATEGORY II
WIND EXPOSURE C
BUILDING CATEGORY ENCLOSED BUILDING
COMPONENT AND CLADDING
2.EARTHQUAKE DESIGN DATA:
SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR____________________________1.00
RISK OCCUPANCY CATEGORY II
MAPPED SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS Ss = 1.15 , S1 = 0.41
SITE CLASS D
SPECTRAL RESPONSE COEFFICIENTS SDS = 0.8 SD1 = 0.5
CONCRETE
1.ALL FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE FOR NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM C33. THE SHRINKAGE
SHALL BE PER ASTM C-157 WITH AVERAGE DRYING SHRINKAGE OF LESS THAN 0.05% AT 28 DAYS.
2.PROVIDE TYPE II OR V PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C-150.
3.PROVIDE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE ATTAINING A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS:
A. ALL SLAB-ON-GRADE 2500 PSI
B . ALL CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS AND PADS 2500 PSI
4.ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLUMP OF 4", EXCEPT THAT THE SLUMP MAY BE INCREASED BY 1" WHEN HAND
CONSOLIDATED. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM WATER CEMENT RATIO OF 0.62.
5.THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO SULFATES FOR SLAB-ON-GRADES
AND FOUNDATIONS:
NOTE:
A.A LOWER WATER-CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL RATIO OR HIGHER STRENGTH CONCRETE MAY BE REQUIRED FOR LOW
PERMEABILITY OR FOR PROTECTION AGAINST CORROSION OF EMBEDMENT ITEMS OR FREEZING AND THAWING.
B. WATER SHALL BE CLEAN, FREE OF DELETERIOUS AMOUNT OF ACIDS, ALKALIS, OR ORGANIC MATERIALS.
6.FLY ASH OR POZZOLANS, IF USED, SHALL CONFORM WITH ASTM C 618, CLASS F. USAGE SHALL NOT EXCEED 25 PERCENT,
BY WEIGHT OF THE TOTAL OF THE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS. POZZOLANS THAT ARE USED SHALL HAVE BEEN DETERMINED
BY TEST OR SERVICE RECORD TO IMPROVE SULFATE RESISTANCE WHEN USED IN CONCRETE CONTAINING TYPE V
CEMENT. POZZOLAN USAGE SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 15 PERCENT, BY WEIGHT, OF THE TOTAL CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS.
7.READY MIX CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED AND DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-94-81.
8.MAINTAIN CONCRETE ABOVE 50 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AND IN A MOIST CONDITION FOR A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS AFTER
PLACEMENT.
9.DO NOT USE CONCRETE OR GROUT CONTAINING CHLORIDES.
10.EXCEPT FOR WHERE COLD JOINTS ARE NOTED ON PLANS, CONCRETE SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHICALLY. WHEN
PLACEMENT CONSISTS OF MULTIPLE BATCHES OR TRUCK DELIVERY'S, THE WORK SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO THAT EACH
BATCH IS PLACED WHILE THE PRECEDING ONE IS STILL PLASTIC. IF THE PRECEDING BATCH PLACEMENT HAS JUST
STIFFENED BEYOND THE POINT WHERE IT CAN BE PENETRATED BY VIBRATION, BOND MAY BE ACHIEVED BY THOROUGHLY
AND SYSTEMATICALLY VIBRATING THE SUBSEQUENT BATCH INTO CONTACT WITH THE PROCEEDING BATCH.
11.WHERE NEW CONCRETE IS PLACED AGAINST EXISTING (2-POUR) OR WHERE A MASONRY WALL INTERSECTS CONCRETE,
ROUGHEN CONCRETE SURFACE TO A FULL AMPLITUDE OF 1/16".
12.ALL CONCRETE WITH A 28 DAY STRENGTH GREATER THAN 2500 PSI SHALL HAVE SPECIAL INSPECTION PER THE INSPECTION
PROGRAM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER
WHEN SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR:
A.HE SHALL VERIFY THE TAKING OF TEST SAMPLES.
B.HE SHALL VERIFY SLUMP.
C.HE SHALL VERIFY THE VARIOUS TYPES AND CLASSES OF CONCRETE USED. HE SHALL VERIFY LOAD TICKETS.
D.HE SHALL VERIFY THAT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, PROCEDURES, AND WORKMANSHIP ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND BUILDING CODE.
E.HE SHALL VERIFY THAT PROPER CURING PROCEDURES ARE IMPLEMENTED.
13.TESTING OF CONCRETE:
A.TESTS NEED NOT BE MADE AS NOTED ABOVE PROVIDED THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF CONCRETE PLACED IS LESS THAN
FIFTY (50) CU. YD. IN PLACE OF THE TESTS, A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE MATERIAL
SUPPLIER TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF THE
MATERIALS TO THE JOB SITE. THE LETTER SHALL ASSURE THAT THE CONCRETE WILL HAVE THE STRENGTH SPECIFIED.
B.TESTS SHALL BE MADE WHEN TESTING IS NOTED ABOVE OR WHERE THE TOTAL QUANTITY OF CONCRETE PLACED IS
GREATER THAN FIFTY (50) CU. YD. CONCRETE TEST CYLINDERS SHALL BE TAKEN AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ASTM C 31, & ASTM C 39. A CYLINDER SET IS A SET OF TWO (2) CYLINDERS FROM EACH BATCH OF
CONCRETE SAMPLED. CYLINDER SETS SHALL BE SAMPLED AT A RATE OF NOT LESS THAN ONE (1) SET PER CLASS OF
CONCRETE PLACED PER DAY, NOR LESS THAN ONE SET PER 150 CU. YD. PLACED, NOR LESS THAN ONE SET PER
5000 SQ. FT. OF SLAB OR WALL AREA. FURTHER NO LESS THAN FIVE (5) CYLINDERS SETS SHALL BE MADE OF EACH
CLASS OF CONCRETE OR SHOULD THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BATCHES FOR A GIVEN CLASS OF CONCRETE BE LESS
THAN FIVE (5), ONE (1) CYLINDER SET SHALL BE MADE FOR EACH BATCH PLACED. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE
FURNISHED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. TEST RESULTS SHALL ASSURE THAT
THE CONCRETE CYLINDERS ACHIEVE A MINIMUM STRENGTH SPECIFIED.
0.45
0.45
0.50
--
OVER 2.00
0.20 - 2.00
0.10 - 0.20
0.00 - 0.10
SEVERE
VERY SEVERE
MODERATE
NEGLIGIBLE
EXPOSURE
SULFATE
--
II or V
V W/ POZZOLAN
V
CEMENT TYPE MIN. STRENGTH
28 DAY
4000 PSI
4500 PSI
4500 PSI
WATER-SOLUBLE
SULFATE
S04 IN SOIL,
PERCENTAGE BY
WEIGHT
--
MAX WATER-
CEMENTITIOUS
MATERIAL RATIO BY
WEIGHT
CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
1.MATERIALS USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT WALLS SHALL BE PER THE FOLLOWING
STANDARDS:
A.CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (NORMAL WEIGHT)ASTM C 90.
B.AGGREGATES FOR MORTAR ASTM C 144.
C.AGGREGATES FOR GROUT ASTM C 404.
D.MASONRY CEMENT ASTM C 91a.
E.MORTAR CEMENT ASTM C 1329.
F.PORTLAND CEMENT ASTM C 150.
G.HYDRATED LIME ASTM C 207.
2.WATER SHALL BE CLEAN, FREE FROM DELETERIOUS AMOUNTS OF ACIDS, ALKALIE, AND ORGANIC MATERIALS.
3.CONCRETE MASONRY ASSEMBLAGES NOTED ON THE PLANS AS NOT REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
A. CONCRETE BLOCK SHALL BE CERTIFIED. A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE MATERIAL
SUPPLIER TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF THE
MATERIALS TO THE JOB SITE. THE LETTER SHALL ASSURE THAT THE MATERIALS CONFORM TO ASTM C 90.
B. MORTAR SHALL BE TYPE S AND HAVE BEEN MIXED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IBC TABLE 2103.7(1). THE
MORTAR MIX SHALL ACHIEVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 1800 PSI.
C. GROUT SHALL BE MIXED IN ACCORDANCE TO IBC TABLE 2103.10 AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C 476. THE
GROUT MIX SHALL ACHIEVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 2000 PSI. A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION SHALL BE
FURNISHED BY THE MATERIAL SUPPLIER TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD
PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF THE MATERIALS TO THE JOB SITE.
D. CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS NEED NOT BE INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR.
4. CONCRETE MASONRY ASSEMBLAGES NOTED ON THE PLANS AS REQUIRING SPECIAL INSPECTION SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
A. CONCRETE BLOCK SHALL BE TESTED. TESTS OF THE BLOCKS SHALL BE MADE IN CONFORMANCE TO ASTM C
140. TESTS SHALL BE MADE OF THE BLOCKS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND DURING THE COARSE
OF CONSTRUCTION AT THE RATE OF ONE TEST PER 5000 SQ. FT. OF WALL. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE FURNISHED TO
THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD. A MINIMUM NET COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
OF 1900 PSI SHALL BE SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED.
B. MORTAR SHALL BE TYPE S AND HAVE BEEN MIXED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IBC TABLE 2103.7(1). THE
MORTAR MIX SHALL ACHIEVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 1800 PSI.
C. GROUT SHALL BE MIXED IN ACCORDANCE TO IBC TABLE 2103.10 AND SHALL BE PER ASTM C 476. THE GROUT
MIX SHALL ACHIEVE A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 2000 PSI. TESTS OF THE GROUT SHALL BE PER ASTM C 1019. TESTS
SHALL BE MADE OF THE GROUT DURING THE COARSE OF CONSTRUCTION AT THE RATE OF ONE TEST PER 5000
SQ. FT. OF WALL. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ARCHITECT, AND
ENGINEER-OF-RECORD PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF THE MATERIALS TO THE JOB SITE.
D. CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR.
5.FABRICATION AND PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL STEEL, EMBEDDED ANCHORS, AND HARDWARE SHALL BE
PERIODICALLY INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR WHEN PLACEMENT OF THE CONCRETE MASONRY
ASSEMBLAGES IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO VERIFY:
A.THE MILL CERTIFICATE.
B.THE MATERIALS USED ARE PROPERLY STORED AND PREPARED FOR USE.
C.THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, PROCEDURES, AND WORKMANSHIP ARE PER THE PLANS AND THE BUILDING
CODE.
D.THE REINFORCEMENT BAR GRADES, SIZE, PLACEMENT, AND SPLICES.
A CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL,
ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD.
6.PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE MASONRY ASSEMBLAGES SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY INSPECTED BY A SPECIAL
INSPECTOR WHEN SPECIAL INSPECTIO IS NOTED AS BEING REQUIRED. THE INSPECTOR SHALL BE PRESENT DURING
PREPARATION AND TAKING OF ANY PRISMS OR TEST SPECIMENS, AT THE START OF LAYING UNITS EACH DAY, AFTER
THE PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL TO INSPECT THE GROUT SPACE PRIOR TO EACH GROUTING OPERATIONS.
HE NEED NOT BE PRESENT DURING THE ENTIRE LAYING OPERATION PROVIDED HE IS PRESENT AT THE ONSET OF EACH
DAYS WORK. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO VERIFY:
A.THE TAKING OF TEST SAMPLES.
B.THE MATERIALS USED ARE PROPERLY STORED AND PREPARED FOR USE.
C.THE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS ARE IN PER THE PLANS AND THE BUILDING CODE.
D.THE MORTAR IS PROPERLY PREPARED AND PLACED PER THE PLANS AND THE BUILDING CODE.
E.THE GROUT USED AND PLACED IS PER THE PLANS AND THE BUILDING CODE. HE SHALL VERIFY LOAD TICKETS
FOR TRANSIT MIXED GROUTS.
F.THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, PROCEDURES, AND WORKMANSHIP ARE PER THE PLANS AND THE BUILDING
CODE.
A CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL,
ARCHITECT, AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD.
7.CELLS SHALL BE IN VERTICAL ALIGNMENT TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED CORE OF 3"X3". DOWELS FROM
FOOTINGS SHALL BE SET TO ALIGN WITH CORES CONTAINING REINFORCING.
8.ALL CELLS CONTAINING REINFORCING, ANCHORS OR INSERTS SHALL BE FILLED SOLID WITH GROUT. OTHER CELLS
SHALL BE FILLED WITH GROUT WHEN NOTED ON THE PLANS. UN-GROUTED CELLS SHALL BE BLOCKED WITH A GROUT
STOP FABRIC TO PREVENT THEM FROM BEING INADVERTENTLY GROUTED.
9.CLEAN OUT OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL CELLS TO BE FILLED AT EACH LIFT OR POUR OF
GROUT WHERE SUCH LIFT OR POUR IS IN EXCESS OF 5 FEET IN HEIGHT. OVERHANGING MORTAR OR OTHER
OBSTRUCTION OR DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM INSIDE OF CELL WALLS. CLEAN OUTS SHALL BE SEALED AFTER
INSPECTION, BEFORE GROUTING.
10.HOLD VERTICAL REINFORCING IN POSITION AT TOP AND BOTTOM AND AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 200 BAR
DIAMETERS IN MASONRY WALLS.
11.ALL ANCHOR BOLTS AND INSERTS SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE OR GROUT.
SITE WORK AND FOUNDATIONS
1.THE FOUNDATION DESIGNS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING SOILS REPORT:
PER:ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
PROJECT NUMBER:2107-12-B-4
DATE:MARCH 16, 2022
2.THE FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 2000 PSF.
3.THE SOILS REPORT AND ITS RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH. PERFORM ALL SITE AND PAD PREPARATION,
COMPACTION, EXCAVATION, FILL PLACEMENT, SLAB BASE PREPARATION, ETC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT.
ALL FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE WITH NON-EXPANSIVE SOIL PER THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS.
4.THE BOTTOMS OF FOOTING EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE CLEAN, LEVEL, AND FREE OF LOOSE MATERIAL OR WATER WHEN
CONCRETE IS PLACED. OVER EXCAVATION FOR THE FOOTINGS SHALL BE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. BACK FILL SHALL NOT
BE PLACED UNTIL SUPPORTING FOUNDATIONS, WALLS, AND SLAB HAVE ATTAINED SUFFICIENT STRENGTH TO SUPPORT
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURES.
5.THE SOIL UNDER FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BE NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OR PRESATURATED PER THE SOILS
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER IN
WRITING. BACK FILL IN CONTACT WITH FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE PLACED AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE. EXCAVATIONS AROUND
THE BUILDING SHALL BE KEPT DRY AND STANDING WATER SHALL BE PUMPED OUT PRIOR TO PLACING BACK FILL.
6.THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY UTILITY TRENCHES WHICH EXTEND DEEPER THAN A 45 DEGREE LINE PROJECTED DOWN AND
AWAY FROM THE BOTTOM OUTSIDE CORNER OF ANY FOOTING OF THE BUILDING FOUNDATION. THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY
PIPES OR CONDUITS PLACED UNDER CONTINUOUS OR ISOLATED SPREAD FOOTINGS UNLESS DETAILED OR APPROVED BY
THE ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OF RECORD, AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
7.ALL SURFACE WATER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM SLAB AND NO PONDING SHALL BE ALLOWED NEXT TO FOUNDATION.
REFER TO CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS.
8.VAPOR BARRIER (RETARDER) SHALL BE HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FILM AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM E
1745, "WATER VAPOR RETARDERS USED IN CONTACT WITH SOIL OR GRANULAR FILL UNDER CONCRETE SLABS."
9.ALL HOLD DOWNS, ANCHORS BOLTS, AND POST BASES SHALL BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION.
10.WORKMANSHIP DURING THE PLACING AND FINISHING OPERATIONS AND PROTECTION DURING THE CURING OF THE
FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE RESULTING CURED CONCRETE SHALL BE FREE OF SIGNIFICANT CRACKS OR
SIGNIFICANT VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT.
1401 DOVE STREET, SUITE 520
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PH: (949) 502-5323
20
Update based on final
geotechnical report
SEE UPDATED
DRAWINGS
FOR REVISED
NOTES.
SEE UPDATED
CALCULATIONS.
SEE UPDATED
PLANS.
BAR SIZE CONCRETE
LAP LENGTH
MASONRY
LAP LENGTH
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
19"
29"
41"
54"
74"
21"
39"
47"
68"
78"
STANDARD HOOKS
90° BEND
180° BEND
STIRRUP AND TIE HOOKS
BAR SIZE MIN. DIAMETER (D)
NO. 3 THROUGH NO. 8 6d
8d
10d
D
4d OR
2-1/2" MIN D D
D
12d
45° BEND
NO. 14 AND NO. 18
NO. 9, NO. 10, AND NO. 11
90° BEND
D
6d AT NO. 5 AND SMALLER
12d AT NO. 6, 7, AND 8
135° BEND
D 6d AT NO. 8 AND SMALLER
"d
"
"d"
"d"
"d
"
LAP LENGTH
1"
C
L
R
.
6
1
TYP. LAP SPLICE
CONCRETE EMBEDMENT
WITH HOOKSTRAIGHT BAR
12"
13"
16"
18"
21"
12"
18"
24"
33"
43"
FOOTING DEPTH PER
SCHEDULE "A"
HEIGHT OF STEP
H = 2'-0" MAX.
MATCH FT'G
DEPTH 18" MIN.
2 TIMES
"H" MIN.
1BAR BENDS
2STEP FOOTING5RETAIN 2'-0"- 3.5' CMU7OPP RETAIN 2'-0" - 3.5' CMU
12"
F.G.
6"
F.G.
2'-0"
MAX.
3.5'
MAX.
3'-0"
4'-0"
3"
CLR
EQ.EQ.
GLASS FENCE & ATTACH-
MENT BY OTHERS
6" CMU WITH #4 VERT.
BARS AT 8" O.C.
SOLID GROUT
#4 HORIZ. AT 24" O.C.
WATER PROOFING
BY OTHERS
PERFORATED PIPE
DRAIN W/ GRAVEL IS
REQ'D SEE CIVIL DWG'S
#4 BARS AT 8" O.C.
EA. WAY
#4 BAR
WETSET FIRST COURSE
F.G.
2'-0"
MAX.
3.5'
MAX.
4'-0"
EQ.EQ.
GLASS FENCE & ATTACH-
MENT BY OTHERS
6" CMU WITH #4 VERT.
BARS AT 8" O.C.
SOLID GROUT
#4 HORIZ. AT 24" O.C.
WETSET FIRST COURSE12"
12"
6"
MIN.
F.G.
12"
#4 BAR AT 8" O.C.
#4 CONT.
3"
CLR
4'-0"
WATER PROOFING
BY OTHERS
PERFORATED PIPE
DRAIN W/ GRAVEL IS
REQ'D SEE CIVIL DWG'S
#4 BAR AT 8" O.C.
EA. WAY
(2) #4 AT TOP
OF WALL
(2) #4 AT TOP
OF WALL
HOOK BAR AT
INTERSECTIONS
HOOK BAR
AT ENDS
AT ENDS
HOOK BAR
INTERSECTIONS
HOOK BAR AT
CORNER, SINGLE BAR INTERSECTION, SINGLE BAR
CORNER, DOUBLE BAR INTERSECTION, DOUBLE BAR
REINF. PER PLAN
HOOK BARS TO
FAR SIDE OF
FOOTING
REINF. PER PLAN
HOOK BARS TO
FAR SIDE OF
FOOTING
CONT. CONC.
FTG. OR WALL
CONT. CONC.
FTG. OR WALL
FOOTING
2
1
2
1
IMAGINARY POINT OF REFERENCE
(1'-0"
ABOVE) BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SIDE OF ALL TRENCHES AND EXCAVATIONS
FROM CAVING IN UNTIL ALL BACKFILLING IS COMPLETE. BACKFILL AS REQ'D BY SOILS REPORT OR CIVIL
ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS.
MAINTAIN SOIL AT SIDE OF FOOTING
BOTTOM OF TRENCH OR EXCAVATION SHALL
NOT EXTEND BELOW THIS LINE
WHERE UTILITIES PASS BELOW PERIMETER
FOUNDATION BACK FILL WITH NATIVE
SOIL OR CONCRETE FROM
FOUNDATION POUR
TRENCHING
FOUNDATION
SLOPING GRADE
POINT OF DAYLIGHT
IMAGINARY POINT OF
REFERENCE (1'-0" ABOVE
BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION)
FOOTING
SETBACK TO SLOPE
CAUTION:
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING TRENCH FROM CAVING IN.
10'-0" MIN.
3FOOTING INTERSECTION
4GRADING
6RETAIN 2'-0"- 6' CMU8OPP RETAIN 4'-0" - 5' CMU
12"
F.G.
6"
F.G.
2'-0"
MAX.
6'-0"
MAX.
3'-6"
4'-0"
3"
CLR
EQ.EQ.
GLASS FENCE & ATTACH-
MENT BY OTHERS
6" CMU WITH #4 VERT.
BARS AT 8" O.C.
SOLID GROUT
#4 HORIZ. AT 24" O.C.
WATER PROOFING
BY OTHERS
PERFORATED PIPE
DRAIN W/ GRAVEL IS
REQ'D SEE CIVIL DWG'S
#4 BARS AT 8" O.C.
EA. WAY
#4 BAR
WETSET FIRST COURSE
GLASS FENCE & ATTACH-
MENT BY OTHERS
12"
12"
6"
MIN.
F.G.
12"
6'-0"
4'-0"
MAX.
5'-0"
MAX.
4'-0"
6" CMU WITH #4 VERT.
BARS AT 8" O.C.
#4 HORIZ. AT 24" O.C.
(2) #4 BAR
AT TOP
EQ.EQ.
F.G.
6" CMU WITH #5 VERT.
BARS AT 16" O.C.
SOLID GROUT
WATER PROOFING
BY OTHERS
PERFORATED PIPE
DRAIN W/ GRAVEL IS
REQ'D SEE CIVIL DWG'S
WETSET FIRST COURSE
#5 BAR AT 16" O.C.
EA. WAY
#4 BAR AT 8" O.C.
#4 CONT.
3"
CLR
(2) #4 AT TOP
OF WALL
(2) #4 BAR AT TOP
OF 8" BLOCK
21
1401 DOVE STREET, SUITE 520
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PH: (949) 502-5323
Verify dimensions,
earth soil above heel
is shown as 2'-0" in
calculations.
2'
-
0
"
M
A
X
.
Revise to 8" thickness
as shown in
calculations
Verify, drainage
should be consistent
with geotechnical
report.
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
SHOP DRAWING REVIEW
Proj No Shop Dwg. No139000 Ocean Condominiums 4th
Date By10/05/2020 ARL/CS
MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREVISE AND RESUBMIT
REJECTED
Review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information included in this Contract Document(s). Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the drawings and specificatons. Contractor is responsible for: construction, coordination of his/her work with that of other trades, and performing the work in a safe and satisfactory manner.
NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN SUBMIT SPECIFIED ITEM
161440
10/16/2023 ARL/CS
FPC Residential Struc Review #1
4
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Code References
Calculations per IBC 2021 1807.3, ASCE 7-16
2.00
10.00
0.00
6.00
2,000.0
40.0
0.0
250.0
Criteria Soil Data
Retained Height =ft
Wall height above soil =ft Active Heel Pressure =psf/ftSlope Behind Wall
Height of Soil over Toe in
Water table above
=ft =
=
110.00=pcf
=
Soil Density, Heel
=
Passive Pressure =psf/ft
Allow Soil Bearing =psf
Soil Density, Toe 110.00 pcf
Footing||Soil Friction =0.350
Soil height to ignorefor passive pressure =12.00 in
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
bottom of footing
Surcharge Loads Adjacent Footing Load
Load Type
0.0 Lateral Load =0.0#/ft
0.0
0.0
0.00.0
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =0.00 ft
Wind on Exposed Stem psf20.0=
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel =psf Adjacent Footing Load =0.0 lbs
Axial Dead Load
(Service Level)
=lbs
Footing Type Spread Footing
Surcharge Over Toe psf Footing Width =0.00 ft...Height to Top =0.00 ft Eccentricity =0.00 in...Height to Bottom =0.00 ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Used for Sliding & Overturning
==0.0 ft
Axial Live Load =
Base Above/Below Soil
lbs
=
Axial Load Eccentricity ==Poisson's Ratio 0.300
at Back of Wall
in (Strength Level)
Wind (W)=
THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED WITH
THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
AND AS IS LISTED IN THE SOILS
REPORT.
Verify use of 0.350
with project
geotechnical engineer
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Design Summary
Wall Stability RatiosOverturning =1.96
Global Stability =3.37
OK
Sliding =1.90 OK
Total Bearing Load =1,185 lbs
...resultant ecc.=9.87 in
Eccentricity outside middle thirdSoil Pressure @ Toe =852 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =0 psf OK
Allowable =2,000 psfSoil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =1,193 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =0 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =0.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =1.9 psi OK
Allowable =75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =300.0 lbs
less 100% Passive Force
less 100% Friction Force
Added Force Req'd
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0=
414.8
156.3
==
0.0
-
lbs
lbs
lbs OK
lbs OK
-
Masonry Block Type =
Stem Construction 2nd Bottom
Ratio > 1.0
Shear.....Actual
Design Height Above Ftg =8.00ft 0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"=Fence Masonry
Thickness =6.00
Rebar Size =#4
Rebar Spacing =8.00
Rebar Placed at =EdgeDesign Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa =1.180
Total Force @ Section
=48.0 200.0lbs
Moment....Actual
=96.0 893.3ft-#
Moment.....Allowable =756.8ft-#
=3.0psi
Shear.....Allowable =44.1
Wall Weight =0.0psf
Rebar Depth 'd'=in 2.81
Masonry Data
f'm =1,500psiFs=psi 20,000Solid Grouting =Yes
Modular Ratio 'n'=21.48
Equiv. Solid Thick.=5.63
Concrete Dataf'c =psi
Fy =
Masonry Design Method ASD=
Load Factors
Building Code
Dead Load 1.200
Live Load 1.600
Earth, H 1.600
Wind, W 1.600
Seismic, E 1.000 psi
Service Level
=lbsStrength Level
Service Level
Strength Level =ft-#
Service Level
Strength Level =psi
Design Method =ASD SD SDSD
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Anet (Masonry)=67.50in2
SEE UPDATED CALCULATIONS
AND DETAIL.
THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER AND IS ACCEPTABLE TO USE 100%.
Revise reinforcing in
stem, ratio exceeds
1.0
Verify use of passive
and friction for sliding
check with project
geotechnical engineer
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
0.00
3.50
12.00
Footing Torsion, Tu =
=
ft-lbs0.00
Min. As %
Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu
0.0018
=ft-lbs
Footing Data
If torsion exceeds allowable, provide
f'c
0.00
=2,500psi
Toe Width =ft
Heel Width =
Key Distance from Toe
Key Depth
Key Width =in
=in
=
0.00
0.00
0.00 ft
Footing Thickness =in
3.50=
Cover @ Top =2.00 in@ Btm.=3.00 in
Total Footing Width
=150.00pcfFooting Concrete DensityFy =40,000 psi
Footing Design Results
Key:
=
No key defined
Factored Pressure
Mu' : Upward
Mu' : Downward
Mu: Design
Actual 1-Way Shear
Allow 1-Way Shear
Toe:Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
#4@ 9.25 in, #5@ 14.35 in, #6@ 20.37 in, #7@ 27.77 in, #8@ 36.57 in, #9@
46.29 in, #10@ 58.79 in
=None Spec'd
=
=
=
=
=
1,193
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
Heel:
0
849
2,165
1,316
1.89
75.00
HeelToe
psf
ft-#
ft-#
ft-#
psi
psi
Heel Reinforcing =# 4 @ 8.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Key Reinforcing
Toe Reinforcing =
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
0.91
0.26
#4@ 9.26 in
#5@ 14.35 in
#6@ 20.37 in
in2
in2 /ft
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 40.74 in
supplemental design for footing torsion.
phiMn 8,563=
OKOK
Flush toe condition. No reinforcing required.
OK - Flush
THIS WAS KEPT AT 40 ksi AS
A WORST CASE IN CASE #4
BARS ARE USED.
Verify, fy should be
taken as 60 ksi
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....RESISTING..........OVERTURNING.....Force Distance Moment Distance Moment
Item
Force
ft-#lbs ftft ft-#lbs
Sloped Soil Over Heel
=Surcharge over Heel
=
Surcharge Over Heel
=
=
Adjacent Footing Load
=Adjacent Footing Load
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
=* Axial Live Load on Stem
Soil Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Surcharge Over Toe
Load @ Stem Above Soil
=
120.0 8.00 960.0
=
=
=
=
=
Stem Weight(s)
=Earth @ Stem Transitions
=Footing Weight
=
525.0 1.75 918.8
Key Weight
=
Added Lateral Load
lbs
=1,140.0
Vert. Component
Total
=
1,185.0 2,238.8
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overturningresistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Total =R.M.
=300.0 O.T.M.
=
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =1.96
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =1,185.0 lbs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
660.0 2.00
2.00
1,320.0
1,320.0
Water Table
Buoyant Force =
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
180.0 1.00 180.0
Hydrostatic Force
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)0.081 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Rebar Lap & Embedment Lengths Information
Stem Design Segment: Bottom
Stem Design Height: 0.00 ft above top of footing
Calculated Rebar Stress, fs = 14981.68 psi
Lap Splice length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment (25.4.2.4a) =20.00 in
Development length for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =14.98 in
Hooked embedment length into footing for #4 bar specified in this stem design segment =3.94 in
As Provided =0.3000 in2/ft
As Required =0.2172 in2/ft
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
LIC# : KW-06015694, Build:20.23.08.30 MOR ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION:Retain 2' Prop Side 6.0' 6" Wall
Project File: Retain.ec6
Project Title:Engineer:Project ID:Project Descr:
Provide calculation
for utilizing 20 psf of
wind pressure
ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
485 Corporate Drive, Suite B
Escondido, California 92029
Telephone: (619) 867-0487 Fax: (714) 409-3287
ORANGE AND L.A. COUNTIES INLAND EMPIRE SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES
(714) 786-5661 (619) 867-0487 (619) 867-0487
H.G. Fenton Company March 16, 2022
7577 Mission Valley Road P/W 2107-12
San Diego, California 92108 Report No. 2107-12-B-4
Attention: Ryley Webb
Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Infiltration Study, Proposed
Multi-Family Residential Development, 7200-7294 Ponto Drive, Carlsbad, California
References: Appendix A
Gentlepersons:
Pursuant to your request, Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. (AGS) has prepared this preliminary
geotechnical investigation and infiltration study for the proposed multi-family residential development
located on 7200-7294 Ponto Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California. In this report, AGS presents the
results of our geotechnical investigation, and we discuss geologic/geotechnical issues associated with
grading and development of the proposed project. AGS appreciates the opportunity to provide you with geotechnical consulting services on this project. If
you have questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (619) 867-
0487.
Respectfully Submitted,
Advanced Geotechnical Solutions, Inc.
Prepared by:
__________________________
ANDRES BERNAL
RCE 62366/GE 2715, Reg. Exp. 9-30-23
Reviewed by:
___________________________ _____________________________
JOHN J. DONOVAN PAUL J. DERISI
RCE 65051/GE 2790, Reg. Exp. 6-30-23 CEG 2536, Reg. Exp. 5-31-23
Distribution: (1) Addressee (electronic copy)
-PROVIDE FINAL REPORT
-PROVIDE VALUE FOR FOOTING/SOIL FRICTION. CONFIRM USE
OF 100% COMBINED PASSIVE AND FRICTION FOR SLIDING CHECK
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONALSHOP DRAWING REVIEW
Proj No Shop Dwg. No139000 Ocean Condominiums 4th
Date By10/05/2020 ARL/CS
MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTED
Review is only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information included in this Contract Document(s). Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the drawings and specificatons. Contractor is responsible for: construction, coordination of his/her work with that of other trades, and performing the work in a safe and satisfactory manner.
NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN SUBMIT SPECIFIED ITEM
161440
10/16/2023 ARL/CS
FPC Residential Struc Review #1
4
March 16, 2022 Page 15
P/W 2107-12 Report No. 2107-12-B-4
ADVANCED GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
The seismic load can be modeled as a thrust load applied at a point 0.4H above the base of
the wall, where H is equal to the height of the wall. The seismic load (in pounds per lineal
foot of wall) may be calculated as follows:
Pe = ⅜ *γ*H2 *kh
where: Pe = Seismic thrust load
H = Height of the wall (feet)
γ = soil unit weight = 125 pounds per cubic foot (pcf)
kh = seismic pseudostatic coefficient = 0.5 * PGAM (PGAM see Table 4.5.3)
6.6.6. Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage
Retaining walls should be waterproofed and adequately drained in order to limit hydrostatic
buildup behind walls. To relieve the potential for hydrostatic pressure, free draining
backfill (sand equivalent “SE” >20) and a heel drain should be placed (see Figure 3). Wall
drainage may be provided by a geosynthetic drainage composite such as TerraDrain®,
MiraDrain®, or equivalent, may be used. The drain should be placed continuously along
the back of the wall and connected to a 4-inch-diameter perforated pipe. The pipe should
be sloped at least 1% and should be surrounded by 1 cubic foot per foot of ¾-inch crushed
rock wrapped in suitable non-woven filter fabric (Mirafi® 140N or equivalent). Crushed
rock should meet the requirements defined in Section 200-1.2 of the latest edition of the
“Greenbook” Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Public Works
Standards, 2018). The drain should discharge through a solid pipe to an appropriate outlet.
FIGURE 3
Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage