HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 2017-0008; OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD; FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION SERVICES DURING SITE VISIT; 2006-08-30FINAL REPORT OF TESTING
AND OBSERVATION SERVICES
DURING SITE GRADING
CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH
BUSINESS PARK - PHASE I
LOTS I THROUGH 9
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
TECHBILT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 30, 2006
PROJECT NO. 06442-32-04A
A I
GEOCON
INCOR P OR ATED
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
Project No. 06442-32-04A
August 30, 2006
Techbilt Construction Company
3575 Kenyon Street
San Diego, California 92110
Attention: Mr. Raul Guzman
Subject: CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH BUSINESS PARK - PHASE 1
LOTS 1 THROUGH 9
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
FINAL REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATION
SERVICES DURING SITE GRADING
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request and our Proposal No. LG-05260 revison dated August 1, 2005, we
have provided testing and observation services during grading for Phase 1 of Carlsbad Oaks North
Business Park, Lots 1 through 9. The site is located to the west of the intersection of Melrose Drive
and Faraday Avenue. The scope of our services included the following:
Observing the grading operation including the placement of compacted fill, the removal
and/or processing of loose topsoil, alluvial deposits, landslide debris and undocumented fill
placed by others; and the undercutting of formational material exposed at or near street
subgrade to facilitate utility excavations. In addition, we observed the placement of several
subdrain systems to verify proper installation.
Performing in-place density and moisture content tests in fill placed and compacted on the
pads/lots and associated streets.
Performing laboratory tests to aid in evaluating the compaction, shear strength, and
expansion characteristics of the soil material used as fill. In addition, the water-soluble sulfate
content of randomly selected samples from finish grade was tested.
Preparing an As-Graded Geologic Map.
Preparing this final report of grading.
6960 Flanders Drive 0 San Diego, California 92121-2974 0 Telephone (858) 558-6900 0 Fax (858) 558-6159
The purpose of this report is to document that the grading of the subject business park has been
performed in substantial conformance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report
and subsequent consultations and that the fill materials have been properly compacted. At the time of
this report, the grading for Lots 1, 2, and 6 was incomplete and an addendum report will be provided
for these lots after completion. In addition, the density tests for portions of Lots 13 and 14 (Phase 2)
that were part of the overall mass grading plan for Phase 1 have also been included herein.
Grading operations for Phase 1 were performed concurrently with those for El Fuerte Street and
Faraday Avenue. Geotechnical information relating to the grading of these roads is presented in the
following reports:
Final Report of Testing and Observation Services During Roadway Grading, Carlsbad Oaks
North Business Park, Faraday Avenue Extension - Station10+00 through 80+80, Carlsbad,
California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated July 27, 2006 (Project Nos. 06442-32-
05A and 06442-32-06A).
Final Report of Testing and Observation Services During Site Grading, Carlsbad Oaks North
Business Park, El Fuerte Street Extension - Station 10+00 through 38+00, Carlsbad,
California, prepared by Geocon Incorporated, dated July 13, 2006 (Project No. 06442-32-
08A).
An update geotechnical report presenting fine grading recommendations and geotechnical design
criteria for the proposed ultimate development should be prepared by Geocon Incorporated once final
plans have been prepared for the individual building pads.
GENERAL
The grading contractor for the project was Pinnick Incorporated of El Cajon, California. The project
grading plans were prepared by O'Day Consultants, the project civil engineer, and are entitled
Grading and Erosion Control Plans for: Carlsbad Oaks North, Phase I, C.T. 97-13, City of Carlsbad
approval dated October 26, 2004 (Drawing No. 415-9A). Recommendations for grading were
provided in our report entitled Update Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Oaks North, Business
Park and Faraday Avenue Offsite, Carlsbad, California, dated October 21, 2004 (Project No. 06442-
32-03). Staking and collection of the field survey information was performed by O'Day Consultants.
The exhibit used as a base map to present the as-graded geologic information and in-place density test
loca:ions (Figures 1 through 4) is a copy of a compilation of digital information provided by O'Day
Consultants. The map depicts the ultimate grading configuration with respect to lot lines, slope areas,
lot numbers, and finish pad elevations. In addition, the existing ground topography prior to grading is
shown. The base-of-fill elevations are also presented. This information was collected by surveyors
from O'Day Consultants during remedial grading operations. The as-graded geologic contacts were
Project No. 06442-32-04A -2 - August 30, 2006
derived from intermittent field survey shots and estimates made by our field representatives based on
survey and/or grade-checkers' stakes. In this regard, the contacts should be considered approximate.
References to elevations and locations herein are based on as-graded survey information (remedial
grading exhibits) provided by O'Day Consultants or grade-checkers' stakes in the field. Geocon
Incorporated does not provide surveying services and, therefore, has no opinion regarding the
accuracy of the as-graded elevations or surface geometry with respect to the approved grading plans
or proper surface drainage.
GRADING
Grading began with removing and exporting brush and vegetation from the areas to be graded.
Topsoil, alluvium, landslide debris, and undocumented fill deposits were then removed to expose
formational material. Within areas to receive fill, the exposed soil was then scarified, moisture
conditioned and compacted. Fill materials from on-site excavations were then placed and compacted
in layers until the design elevations were attained. The areas where hard rock or dense formational
material was exposed at or near street subgrade were undercut approximately 7 feet to facilitate the
excavations for underground utilities. The undercut criteria where formational materials exposed near
finish grade of the building pads was determined on a case-by-case basis by the owner, depending
upon the apparent rippability of the materials exposed. Future excavations in areas where undercuts
were not performed may encounter difficult digging and require breaking and/or localized blasting.
Also, oversize material may be generated by the excavations and require special handling. Refer to
the "As-Graded" Geologic Map (Figures 1 through 4) for the approximate delineation of formational
areas.
Fill Materials and Placement Procedures
The on-site fill materials generally consisted of silty to clayey sands and sandy clays with mixtures of
gravel and boulders generated from the various formational units exposed on site. In general, the
upper 10 feet of building pads and roadways were limited to oversize material less than 12 inches in
maximum dimension and 6 inches in the upper 3 feet. Rock material greater than 12 inches was
placed deeper than 10 feet below proposed finish grade and at least 3 feet below the deepest utility.
Fill materials classified as "soil-rock" mixtures were placed in some portions of the site by spreading
and compacting the materials with a Caterpillar bulldozer in lifts 2 to 3 feet thick or less. During
placement of each lift, the fill was uniformly wheel-rolled with loaded rock trucks. These materials
were heavily watered during spreading prior to compacting. Soil fills were placed in lifts no thicker
than would allow for adequate bonding and compaction. The soil was moisture conditioned, as
necessary, and mixed during placement.
Project No. 06442-32-04A -3 - August 30. 2006
Field In-Place Density and Laboratory Testing
During grading, compaction procedures were observed and in-place density tests were performed to
evaluate the relative compaction of the fill material. The in-place density tests were performed in
general conformance with ASTM Test Method D 2922-01 (nuclear). Results of the field density tests
and moisture content tests performed during grading are summarized on Table I and the approximate
locations are presented on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map. In general, the in-place density test results
indicate that the fill at the locations tested has a relative compaction of at least 90 percent and an
appropriate moisture content.
Laboratory tests were performed on samples of material used for fill to evaluate moisture-density
relationships, optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557-02), expansion
characteristics (ASTM D 4829-03), sulfate potential (CA Test No. 417) and shear strength (ASTM
D 3030-03). Laboratory testing for Phase I (Lots 1 through 9) was performed concurrently with the
grading for Faraday Avenue .and El Fuerte Street; as such, the sample numbers are not in consecutive
order. The results of the laboratory tests that are applicable to the subject grading are summarized on
Tables II through V.
Slopes
Cut and fill slopes were graded at design inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter, with
maximum heights df approximately 70 feet. Slopes that exposed potentially adverse conditions (e.g.,
weak siltstones and claystones, erosive soils, extensive seepage, etc.) were provided with a stability
fill. The area where a stability fill was constructed is shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map.
In general, fill slopes were either over-filled and cut back or track-walked with a bulldozer during
grading. Fill slopes comprised of clayier soil may be prone to surficial loosening due to cyclical
wetting and drying and may require increased maintenance. All slopes should be planted, drained,
and maintained to reduce erosion. Slope irrigation should be kept to a minimum to just support the
vegetative cover. Surface drainage should not be allowed to flow over the top of the slope.
Stabilization Fill Slopes
A drained stabilization fill was constructed behind Lot 2 to reduce the potential of surficial slope
instability due to the presence of weak claystone and siltstone materials and extensive seepage. In
general, a 1:1 (horizontal: vertical) backcut was initiated beyond the top of slope and was extended
below pad grade. A heel drain and panel drain system was installed to collect the seepage
encountered along the temporary backcut. The excavation was then was backfllled with compacted
granular fill material. Figure 5, Geologic Cross Section A-A', shows the approximate limits of the
stability fill.
Project No. 06442-32-04A -4- August 30, 2006
Subdrains (General)
Two types of subdrains were constructed in accordance with our recommendations. The systems
consisted of a stability fill backdrain and canyon subdrains. The subdrain locations were surveyed by
the project civil engineer and the locations are presented on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map.
Additional discussion regarding the construction of the drainage systems is provided below.
The final segment of subdrains consisted of non-perforated drainage pipe provided with a concrete
cut-off wall constructed at the perforated/non-perforated interface. It is recommended that all
subdrain outlets that empty into open space or brow ditches be provided with a headwall structure to
protect the end of the pipe from damage or burial.
Stability Fill Backdrains
The stability fill constructed on the north facing slope behind Lot 2 was provided with a drain system
consisting of 4-foot-wide Mirafi drainage panels positioned approximately 20 to 30 feet on center and
vertically oriented against the temporary backcut and connected to a heel drain at the bottom. The
heel drain consisted of an 8-inch-diameter perforated PVC pipe surrounded by 3%-inch, open-graded
gravel wrapped in filter fabric. The heel drain was extended to the west and east along the stability
fill backcut and ultimately connected to a storm drain box structure located outside of the toe of slope
at El Fuerte Street approximate Station 17+75 and into the brow ditch situated on the west side of
Lot 2. In addition, heel drain cleanouts were installed along the stability fill backcut in the event that
future maintenance is necessary. The cleanouts were capped at the finish ground surface and their
locations have been shown on the "As-Graded" Geologic Map.
Canyon Subdrains
Typical canyon subdrains consisting of 8-inch, perforated PVC pipe encapsulated in gravel and filter
fabric were placed at the base of the remedial excavations where a depression occurred in the bedrock
topography. Some of the original subdrain alignments were later diverted due to conflicts with
underground utilities in Faraday Avenue which were not known during the initial placement of the
subdrain system.
Finish Grade Soil Conditions
Observations and laboratory test results indicate that prevailing soils randomly sampled (for Lots 3, 4,
5, 7 and 8) at finish grade have an Expansion Index (El) ranging from 0 to 2 and are classified as
having a "very low" expansion potential (El of 20 or less) as defined by Uniform Building Code
(UBC) Table 18-I-B. The expansion condition for the lots in an interim condition will be provided
upon completion of grading. Table ifi presents the results of the expansion classification for the
prevailing soils at finish grade.
Project No. 06442-32-04A - 5 - August 30, 2006
Oversize fragments and rock materials were generated from excavations during the grading operation.
To the extent possible, the oversize material was placed within the 'hold down" areas as previously
discussed. The potential for encountering oversize materials (12 inches or greater) should be
considered if deep excavations (10 feet or more) are proposed (i.e., underground utilities, etc.).
Although particular attention was given to restricting the oversize material to the placement zones
described previously, some randomly occurring fragments larger than 12 inches in nominal diameter
may be present in the upper portions of fill areas. The performance of the fill, however, should not be
adversely affected and the grading performed is considered to be in substantial conformance with our
recommendations.
Corrosion
Laboratory tests performed on random soil samples to measure the percentage of water-soluble
sulfate of the compacted fill at finish grade for Lots 3 through 5, and 7 and 8 indicate that the on-site
materials possess a "negligible" to "moderate" potential for sulfate exposure to concrete structures, as
defined by UBC Table 19-A-4. Table V presents the results of the water-soluble sulfate for the
various lots sampled (Lots 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8).
Geocon Incorporated does not practice in the field of corrosion engineering. Therefore, it is
recommended that further evaluation by a corrosion engineer be performed if improvements are
planned that are susceptible to corrosion.
SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
In general, the soil and geologic conditions encountered during grading were found to be similar to
those described in the referenced project geotechnical report. The enclosed "As-Graded" Geologic
Map Figures I through 4) depicts the general geologic conditions observed. Information provided by
the project paleontologist was utilized in identifying the geologic units. Figure 5 (Geologic Cross
Section A-A') represents the general geometry of the stability fill. The figures have been annotated to
show a general representation of the as-graded geologic conditions observed during grading.
Geologic contacts should be considered approximate. No geologic conditions were observed during
grading that would preclude the continued development of the lots.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 General
1.1 Based on observations and test results, it is the opinion of Geocon Incorporated that the
grading, which is the subject of this report, has been performed in substantial conformance
with the recommendations of the referenced project soil reports. Soil and geologic
conditions encountered during grading that differ from those anticipated by the project soil
Project No. 06442-32-04A -6- August 30, 2006
report are not uncommon. Where such conditions required a significant modification to the
recommendations of the project soil report, they have been described herein.
1.2 No soil or geologic conditions were observed during grading that would preclude the
continued development of the property as planned. Based upon laboratory test results and
field observations, it is our opinion that the fill soils within the subject lots and associated
streets have generally been compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at the
locations tested.
1.3 Fine grading and construction of utilities/foundations may encounter non-rippable
formational material and/or generate some concretionary fragments and/or rock material 12
inches or greater in situ. Deeper excavations within the fill (10 feet or greater) for
improvements such as utility lines, loading docks, etc., may also encounter oversize
material (12 inches or greater). The potential for these conditions should be taken into
consideration when determining the type of equipment to utilize for future excavation
operations. The oversize material may require special handling techniques and exportation.
1.4 It is not uncommon for groundwater or seepage conditions to develop where none
previously existed, particularly after landscape irrigation is initiated. The occurrence of
induced groundwater seepage from landscaping can be greatly reduced by implementing
and monitoring a landscape program that limits irrigation to that sufficient to support the
vegetative cover without overwatering. Shallow subdrains may be required in the future if
seeps occur after rainy periods or after landscaping is installed.
1.5 References to the thickness and extent of rock hold-down areas within roadways or capping
of building pads are approximate and were based upon the finish grade elevations of the
approved referenced grading plans.
2.0 Drainage
2.1 Adequate drainage provisions are imperative. Under no circumstances should water be
allowed to pond adjacent to footings. The building pads should be properly finish graded
after the buildings and other improvements are in place so that drainage water is directed
away from foundations, pavements, concrete slabs, and slope tops to controlled drainage
devices.
Project No. 06442-32-04A - 7 - August 30, 2006
3.0 Update Geotechnical Report
3.1 An update geotechnical report presenting fine-grading recommendations and geotechnical
design criteria should be prepared by Geocon Incorporated once the final development
plans have been prepared for the subject lots.
LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained herein apply only to our work with respect to
grading and represent conditions at the date of our final observation of grading operations on June 13,
2006. Any subsequent grading should be done in conjunction with our observation and testing
services.
As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of the work with
which we agreed to be involved. Our services did not include the evaluation or identification of the
potential presence of hazardous materials. Our conclusions and opinions as to whether the work
essentially complies with the job specifications are based on our observations, experience and test
results. Due to the inaccuracies inherent in most field and laboratory soil tests, and the necessary
assumption that the relatively small soil sample tested is representative of a significantly larger
volume of soil, future tests of the same soil location or condition should not be expected to duplicate
specific individual test results of this report. Subsurface conditions, and the accuracy of tests used to
measure such conditions, can vary greatly at any time. We make no warranty, express or implied,
except that our services were performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted
at this time and location.
We will accept no responsibility for any, subsequent changes made to the site by others, by the
uncontrolled action of water, or by the failure of others to properly repair damages caused by the
uncontrolled action of water. It is the responsibility of Techbilt Construction Company to ensure that
the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect
and engineer for the project, are incorporated into the plans, and that the necessary steps are taken to
see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.
Recommendations that pertain to the future maintenance and care for the property should be brought
to the attention of future owners of the property or portions thereof. The findings and
recommendations of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our
control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of
three years.
Project No. 06442-32-04A - 8 - August 30, 2006
Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please
contact the undersigned at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
GEOCON INCORPORATED
6-- %011 Ik - 1~6a
Troy IZ. Reist
CEG 2408
WOML
o 1BOYKREIST .
cc No. 2408 Cl)
. CERTIFIED (
* ENGINEERING * p GEOLOGIST .
PFCAUV
Shane Rodacker
RCE 63291
TKR:SR:anh
(10/del) Addressee
Project No. 06442-32-04A - 9 - August 30, 2006
*—:
-1-
/
JJJ / YO'FA[A ,-
_T1
- —cc
-- --
- / A - -.: - - - --\
----. - -
FV-
- ---------e -- ----- -- ---- -- -."- - - -. ----..-- -. - /_r -
- --- - -a----- ----- ------ - 7 - --- --*-
A ---------Z:. - çj-' -f ---
- 1111.1
2
\\
/ H7/
\\
\
\ --.- -
N Kgj
-SL
,!J C, L
\\ \\\\\
"
/
;' K N
4756 488
-
2sNA
14
Kgr-
IN
>LT •Qc -
-
mn:~ 2OTTO
YQcf -
-..---.: -...:. -::' ------.-
- IT '\\ ;<'114
9 1io ,
L
4
J90. J
00
IV 7
fr/%UX :T;:<.T /•
Nn",W,
7/.Th!fl
Rr
JA
jao
--T '
-
- -
- - -1
- -.--- - L- /
- -
CARLSBAD OAKS BUSINESS PARK
PHASE 1 LOTS 1 THROUGH 9
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
A'
-320
Kp
85OSTII4G Tha GRADE
SILTSTONEAN
PANEL
-------------------
DRAIN
Kp Kp
1-300
280
z
1260 'U
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
DISTANCE (Feet)
GEOCON LEGEND GEOLOGIC CROSS - SECTION A - A
SCALE: -1 = 20' (Horlz. Vert.)
Qcf ........COMPACTED FILL
Quc ........COMPACTED FILL IN UNDERCUT AREA
Tsa ........SANTIAGO FORMATION GE000N 0 Kp ........POINT LOMAFORMATION INCORPORATED
.APPROX LOCATION OF GEOLOGIC CONTACT
G€O1EO11ALcONSIA'TANTS
6960 R.AI.CERSDRIVE- SAN 0800, CAIFCPNA 92T21-1974
(Que6ed Where Uncertain) PIIOI.(858558-6900- FAX 8585556159
PROJECT NO. 06442 -32 - 04A
FIGURE 5
DATE 8/30/2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(ft)
Curve
NO.
Plus
3/4
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pCf)
Field
Moist.
Cont.
Field
Re!.
Comp.
Reqd.
Rel.
Comp.
1 07/11/05 Lot 312 1 0 119.9 8.7 93 90
2 07/11/05 Lot 312 1 0 117.3 9.1 91 90
3 07/11/05 Lot 6 316 1 0 116.3 8.9 90 90
4 07/12/05 Lot 308 4 0 111.7 17.6 90 90
5 07/12/05 Lot 317 4 0 114.1 18.2 92 90
6 07/12/05 Lot 312 4 0 111.5 16.4 90 90
7 07/12/05 Lot . 319 4 0 111.4 16.6 90 90
8 07/14/05 Lot 1 230 1 0 116.3 9.7 90 90
9 07/14105 Lot 232 1 0 118.5 10.1 92 90
10 07/14/05 Lot 1 236 --0 176 10•0 91 -------------------------------------------------------------- -
90
11 07/14/05 Lot 240 1 0 116.7 9.8 90 90
12 07/15/05 Lot 238 1 0 119.1 10.4 92 90
13 07/15/05 Lot 242 1 0 117.1 9.3 91 90
14 07/15105 Lot 1 244 1 0 116.3 9.5 90 90
15 07/15/05 Lot 245 1 0 116.8 10.7 91 90
16 07/19/05 Lot 320 4 0 115.0 14.1 93 90
17 07/19/05 Lot 322 4 0 111.6 13.2 90 90
18 07/20/05 Lot 328 3 0 117.8 10.1 92 90
19 07/20/05 Lot 236 3 0 116.0 9.3 91 90
20 07/20/05 Lot 1 244 3 - 0 115.2 9.5 90 90
21 07/20/05 Lot 1 246 3 0 118.0 9.6 92 90
22 07/22/05 Lot 318 2 0 117.1 9.3 90 90
23 07/22/05 Lot 323 2 0 119.3 8.5 92 90
24 07/22/05 Lot 6 322 2 0 117.4 8.4 90 90
25 07/22/05 Lot 334 2 0 119.3 9.0 92 90
26 07/22/05 Lot 8 307 1 0 116.3 8.9 90 90
27 07/22/05 Lot 311 1 0 116.7 9.3 90 90
28 07/22/05 Lot 316, 1 0 121.2 10.0 94 90
29 07/22/05 Lot 320 1 0 116.4 11.0 90 90
30 07/25/05 Lot6 338 1 0 117.1 8.9 91 90
31 07/25/05 Lot 340 1 0 119.8 11.2 93 90
32 07/25/05 Lot 342 1 0 116.3 9.2 90 90
33 07/25/05 Lot 6 343 1 0 121.7 9,6 94 90
34 07/25/05 Lot 6 345 1 0 116.4 8.6 90 90
35 07/25/05 Lot 345 1 0 118.0 9.7 91 90
36 07/25/05 Lot 346 4 0 113.7 12.7 92 90
37 07/25/05 Lot 346 4 0 118.0 11.9 95 90
38 07/25/05 Lot 347 3 0 115.6 9.9 90 90
39 07/25/05 Lot 347 3 0 116.0 10.4 91 90
40 07/26/05 Lot 347 4 0 114.0 13.7 92 90
41 07/26/05 Lot 326 4 0 111.6 14.1 90 90
42 07/26/05 Lot 328 3 0 116.1 11.1 91 90
43 07/26/05 Lot 348 3 0 116.6 10.3 91 90
44 07/26/05 Lot 349 3 0 118.3 9.7 92 90
45 07/26/05 Lot 6 345 3 0 115.6 9.2 90 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(
Cure
No.
Plus
3/4'
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pcfl
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
Reqd.
Rd.
Comp.
(%)
46 07/26/05 Lot 349 3 0 115.2 11.4 90 90
47 07/26/05 Lot 6 349 3 0 120.4 12.2 94 90
48 07/26/05 Lot 350 3 0 116.5 .9.4 91 90
49 07/26/05 Lot 6 343 2 0 122.8 9.0 94 90
50 07/27/05 Lot 352 3 0 118.7 9.5 93 90
51 07/27/05 Lot
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
352 3 0 116.4 10.7 91 90
52 07/27/05 Lot 351 3 0 117.5 9.4 92 90
53 07/27/05 Lot 6 333 3 0 124.9 10.9 98 90
54 07/27/05 Lot 350 3 0 115.6 12.0 90 90
55 07/27/05 Lot 353 3 0 118.8 9.2 93 90
56 07/27/05 Lot 330 3 0 116.5 9.6 91 90
57 07/28/05 Lot 1 255 3 0 117.4 9.6 92 90
58 07/28/05 Lot 1 249 3 0 115.2 9.9 90 90
59 07/28/05 Lot 336 2 0 119.8 8.4 92 90
60 07/28/05 Lot 6 340 2 0 122.4 9.3 94 90
61 07/28/05 Lot 358 2 0 117.1 9.5 90 90
62 07/28/05 Lot 6 333 2 0 117.2 8.7 90 90
63 08/01/05 Lot 325 3 0 118.7 10.4 93 90
64 08/02/05 Lot 310 3 0 117.4 9.1 92 90
65: 08/02/05 Lot 313 3 0 116.5 8.9 91 90
66 08/02/05 Lot 315 3 0 115,2 10.2 90 90
67 08/02/05 Lot 317 3 0 115.9 11.4 91 90
68 08/03/05 Lot 8 327 3 0 117.8 9.3 92 90
69 08/03/05 Lot 325 3 0 115.5 10.4 90 90
70 08/03/05 Lot 8
. - ,,,
330 3 0 121.39.7 95 90
71 08/03105 Lot 332 3 0 118.2 10.2 92 90
72 08/03/05 Lot 8 336 3 0 115.2 10.5 90 90
73 08/03/05 Lot 334 3 0 116.7 10.0 91 90
7. 08/03/05 Lot 8 336 3 0 121.6 9.4 95 90
75 08/03/05 Lot 8 316 3 0 118.9 9.0 93 90
76 08/04/05 Lot 318 3 0 115.3 9.0 90 90
77 08/04/05 Lot 8 322 3 0 120.1 8.9 94 90
78 08/04/05 Lot 8 314 3 0 124.4 9.7 97 90
79 08/04/05 Lot 319 3 0 116.0 10.4 91 90
80 08/04/05 Lot 8 322 3 0 118.0 10.2 92 90
81 08/04/05 Lot 325 3 0 115.2 8.5 90 90
82 08/04/05 Lot 327 3 0 118.7 8.8 93 90
83 08/04/05 Lot 6 355 2 0 120.0 9.0 92 90
84 08/04/05 Lot 356 2 0 118.7 9.4 91 90
85 08/05/05 Lot
-.
356 2 0 121.0 8.4 93 90
86 08/05/05 Lot 6 357 2 0 123.9 8.5 95 90
8.7 08/05/05 Lot 358 2 0 117.2 9.0 90 90
88 08/05/05 Lot 358 2 0 118.0 9.1 91 90
89 08/05/05 Lot 6 359 2 0 122.0 8.9 94 90
90 08/05/05 Lot 348 2 0 119.4 8.3 92 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No Date Location (ft)No
Elev.
or
Depth Curve
Plus
3/4
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pci)
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
Reqd.
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
91 08/08/05 Lot 6 335 2 0 122.6 8.7 94 90
92 08/08/05 Lot 6 341 2 0 121.4 8.9 93 90
93 08/08/05 Lot 346 2 0 118.0 9.1 91 90
94 08/09/05 Lot 5 305 3 0 120.0 9.7 94 90
95 08/09/05 Lot 5 308 3 0 115.2 10.0 90 90
96 08/10/05 Lot 309 3 0 118.8 12.2 93 90
97 08/10/05 Lot 313 3 0 115.3 11.4 90 90
98 08/10/05 Lot 317 3 0 118.1 9.3 92 90
99 08/10/05 Lot 320 3 0 123.1 10.5 96 90
100 08/10/05 Lot 1 255 3 0 115.5 11.3 90 90
101 08/10/05 Lot 1 259 3 0 117.5 10.2 92 90
102 08/11/05 Lot 320 1 0 117.3 11.4 91 90
103 08/11/05 Lot 321 1 0 121.7 9.8 94 90
104 08/11/05 Lot 324 4 0 112.4 13.7 91 90
105 08/11/05 Lot 324 4 0 111.6 12.9 90 90
106 08/11/05 Lot 326 4 0 116.2 13.9 94 90
107 08/11/05 Whiptail Loop 62+00 342 3 0 118.8 9.7 93 90
108 08/11/05 Whiptai1 Loop 63+30 328 3 0 116.0 10.2 91 90
109 08/11/05 Lot 335 3 0 120.3 9.5 94 90
110 08/12/05 Whiptai1 Loop 60+75 356 .0 117.0 10.3 91 90
111 08/12/05 Lot 338 3 0 115.2 9.6 90 90
112 08/12/05 Lot 329 2 0 125.9 9.5 97 90
113 08/12/05 Lot 334 2 0 119.3 8.9 92 90
114 08/12/05 Lot 332 2 0 118.4 8.5 91 90
11508/12/05 Lot 336 2 0 117.1 8.9 90 90
116 08/15/05 Lot 269 1 0 117.9 9.1 91 90
117 08/15/05 Lot 271 1 0 116.3 8.7 90 90
118 08/15/05 Lot 275 1 0 118.6 9.6 92 90
119 08/16/05 Lot 272 2 0 118.1 9.4 91 90
120 08/16/05 Lot 2852 0 119.7 10.0 92 90
121 08/16/05 Future Park Site 235 4 0 111.6 13.6 90 90
122 08/16/05 Future Park Site 237 4 0 116.3 14.8 94 90
123 08/16/05 Lot 275 2 0 122.6 8.5 94 90
124 08/16/05 Future Park Site 242 4 0 115.0 12.7 93 90
125 08/17/05 Lot 1 245 4 0 112.3 15.5, 91 90
126 08/17/05 Loll 247 4 0 111.6 16.0 90 90
127 08/17/05 Lot 328 2 0 117.1 8.2 90 90
128 08/17/05 Lot 8 330 2 0 123.3 8.5 95 90
129 08/18/05 Whiptail Loop 59+25 373 2 0 119.6 9.3 92 90
130 08/18/05 Lot 7 387 2 0 122.3 9.0 94 90
131 08/18/05 Lot . 389 2 0 117.6 9.0 90 90
132 08/18/05 Lot 394 2 0 120.0 8.7 92 90
ST 133 08/18/05 Lot 1 250 2 0 119.6 8.9 92 90
ST 134 08/18/05 Lot 1 250 2 0 121.0 9.0 93 90
135 08/18/05 Lot 335 2 0 118.5 9.4 91 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30. 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Reqd.
or 3/4" Dry Moist. Re!. Rd.
Depth Cue Rock Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft) No. (°) (Pa) (%) (%) (%)
136 08/18/05 Lot 340 2 0 117.6 8.3 90 90
137 08/18/05 Lot 8 338 2 0 117.4 8.5 90 90
138 08/18/05 Whiptail Loop 60+10 360 2 0 119.3 8.9 92 90
139 08/18/05 Lot 342 2 0 118.0 10.1 91 90
140 08118/05 Lot 353 2 0 123.3 8.5 95
-
90
141 08/18/05 Lot 353 2 0 123.3 8.5 95 90
142 08/22/05 Lot 8 338 2 0 120.7 8.7 93 90
143. 08/22/05 Lot 8 , 332 2 0 117.4 9.3 90 90
144 08/22/05 Lot 8 340 2 0 118.6 10.7 91 90
145 08/22/05 Lot 8 341 2 0 122.7 10.0 94 90
146 08/22/05 Lot 8 342 2 0 120.2 9.7 92 90
147 08/22/05 Lot 344 2 0 117.1 10.4 90 90
148 08/23/05 Lot 8 342 2 0 123.3 9.0 95 90
149 08/23/05 Lot 340 2 0 118.7 8.3 91 90
150 08/23/05 Future Park Site 246 4 0 116.7 13.5 94 90
151 08/23/05 Lot 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
252 4 0 114.1 12.5 92 90
152 08/23/05 Future Park Site 250 4 0 111.6 13.0 90 90
153 08/23/05 Lot 8 343 2 0 117.6 8.3 90 90
154 08/23/05 Lot 8 342 2 0 118.8 8.9 91 90
155 08/24/05 Lot
-- - 325 2 120.6 8.793 90
156 08/24/05 Lot 327 2 0 123.9 8.8 95 90
157 08/24/05 Lot 345 2 0 117.1 9.0 90 90
ST 15E 08/24/05 Lot 1 243 1 0 117.1 8.2 91 90
ST 159 08/24/05 Lot 1 240 1 0 116.3 8.0 90 90
160 08/25/05 Lot 3 279 1 0 118.5 12.0 92 90
161 08/25/05 Lot 280 1 0 116.4 9.1 90 90
162 08/25/05 Lot 350 2 0 117.2 9.0 90 90
163 08/25/05 Lot 6 351 2 0 122.2 9.9 94 90
164 08/25/05 Lot 328 2 0 118.5 10.0 91 90
165 08/25/05 Lot 3 282 1 0 116.8 8.7 91 90
166 08/25/05 Lot 285 1 0 119.3 9.4 92 90
167 08/25/05 Lot 5 334 1 0 116.3 8.3 90 90
168 08/25/05 Lot 333 1 0 121.4 9.6 94 90
169 08/26/05 Lot 288 4 0 111.6 12.5 90 90
170 08/26/05 Lot 288 4 0 112.4 11.8 91 90
171 08/26/05 Lot 295 4 0 115.0 12.7 93 90
172 08/26/05 Lot 3 293 4 0. 112.0 11.4 90 90
173 08/26/05 Lot 295 4 0 114.2 12.2 92 90
174 08/26/05 Lot 298 4 0 111.7 11.4 90 90
175 08/26/05 Lot 315 2 0 121.0 9.2 93 90
176 08/29/05 Lot 308 1 0 116.2 9.9 90 90
177 08/29/05 Lot 311 1 0 116.7 9.3 90 90
173 08/29/05 Lot 332 2 0 118.7 8.8 91 90
179 08/29/05 Lot 5 335 2 0 120.4 9.0 93 90
180 1 08/29/05 Lot 5 309 1 0 115.3 4.6 89 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(ft)
Curve
No.
Plus
3/4
Rock
(°"°)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pcfl
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
Reqd.
Re!.
Comp.
(%)
180A 08/29/05 LotS 309 1 0 119.2 10.1 92 90
181 08/29/05 Lot 324 1 0 114.8 6.1 89 90
181A 08/29/05 Lot 324 1 0 117.4 8.6 91 90
182 08/29/05 Lot 318 1 0 122.6 7.8 95 90
183 08/29/05 Lot 5 334 1 0 122.1 7.6 95 90.
FO 184 08/29/05 Lot 1 260 1 0 117.4 7.2 91 90,
FO 185 08/29/05 Lot 1 263 1 0 116.8 7.0 91 90
186 08/30/05 Lot 308 2 0 120.1 7.8 92 90,
187 08/30/05 Lot 3; North 309 2 0 119.8 7.9 92 90
188 08/30/05 Lot 317 2 0 120.8 8.0 93 90
189 08/30/05 Lot 324 2 0 116.6 5.5 90 90
189A 08/30/05 Lot 324 2 0 119.0 8.0 91 90
190 08/30/05 Lot 326 2 0 118.9 6.1 91 90
190A 08/30/05 Lots 326 2 0 122.6 8.4 94 90
191 08/30/05 Lot 333 ' 2 0 120.1 6.8 92 90
191A 08/30/05 Lot 333 2 0 121.3 8.1 93 90
192 08/30/05 Lot 334 1 0 122.7 11.1 95 90
193 08/30/05 Lot 326 1 0 124.7 9.3 97 90
194 08/31/05 Lot 5 332 2 0 120.2 8.3 92 90
195 08/31/05 Lot ' 333 2 0 123.1 9.7 .95 90
196 08/31/05 Lot 416 2 0 119.2 11.4 92 90
197 08/31/05 Lot 425 4 0 116.5 8.2 94 90
198 08/31/05 Lot 428 2 0 120.1 9.6 92 90
199 08/31/05 Lot 337 2 0 114.1 5.5 88 90
199A 08/31/05 Lot 337 2 0 117.9 10.5 91 90
200 08/31/05 Lot 430 2 0 118.9 7.8 91 90
201 08/31/05 Lot . 337 2 0 120.4 8.8 93 90
202 09/01/05 Lot 5 335 2 0 120.5 9.5 93 90
203 09/01/05 Lot 5 335 2 0 119.6 9.5 92 90
204 09/01/05 Lot 440 2 0 120.9 10.5 93 90
205 09/01/05 Lot ' 441 2 0 122.9 10.0 94 90
206 09/01/05 Lot 297 4 0 113.6 14.6 92 90
207 09/01/05 Lot 298 2 0 120.1 9.0 92 90
208 09/01/05 Lot 297 2 0 118.0 9.2 91 90
209 09/01/05 Lot . 299 2 0 118.9 8.8 91 90
210 09/02/05 Lot 300 2 0 121.0 9.0 93 90
211 09/02/05 Lot 299 2 0 122.2 7.6 94 90
212 09/02/05 Lot 295 2 0 117.4 8.8 90 90
213 09/02/05 Lot 301 2 0 118.8 8.6 91 90
214 09/02/05 Lot 3 302 2 0 120.0 8.9 92 90
215 09/02/05 Lot 3 310 2 0 117.4 8.0 90 90
216 09/02/05 Lot 3; North 311 2 0 117.1 7.9 90 90
217 09/06/05 Lot 312 2 0 120.5 9.6 93 90
218 09/06/05 Lot 3; North 314 2 0 122.7 8.6 94 90
219 09106/05 Lot 315 2 0 121.4 9.8 93 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
('t) Cue
No.
Plus
3/4'
Rock
(°"°)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(Pd)
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Re!.
Comp.
(%)
Reqd.
Re!.
Comp.
(%)
220 09/06/05 Lot 3; North 317 2 0 124.6 8.7 96 90
221 09/06/05 Lot 316 2 0 121.9 9.5 94 90
222 09/06/05 Lot 3; North 318 2 0 123.7 8.7 95 90
223 09/06/05 Lot 300 2 0 119.0 10.6 91 90
224 09/06/05 Lot 302 2 0 118.7 9.6 91 90
225 09/07/05 Lot 3 304 2 0 120.2 9.3 92 90
226 09/07/05 Lot 305 2 0 118.2 8.8 91 90
227 09/07/05 Lot 3 306 2 0 117.0 9.2 90 90
228 09/07/05 Lot 318 2 0 122.8 9.5 94 90
229 09/07/05 Lot 3; North 319 2 0 121.7 7.8 94 90
230 09/07/05 Lot 3 307 2 0 117.9 8,0 91 90
231 09/07/05 Lot 310 2 0 118.8 12.6 91 90
232 09/07/05 Lot 319 2 0 118.9 8.5 91 90
233 09/08/05 Lot 3 308 2 0 119.6 8.8 92 90
234 09/08/05 Lot 3 309 2 0 118.6 9.4 91 90
235 09/08/05 Lot 3 313 2 0 122.4 9.2 94 90
236 09/08/05 Lot 312 2 0 122.8 8.9 94 90
237 09/08/05 Lot 3 308 2 0 121.7 10.7 94 90
238 09/08/05 Lot 310 2 0 121.5 8.5 93 90
239 09/09/05 Lot 314 2 0 117.7 10.2 90 90
240 09/09/05 Lot 3 311 2 0 122.9 8.0 94 90
241 09/09/05 Lot 309 2 0 119,4 8.7 92 90
242 09/13/05 Lot 3 320 2 0 120.1 8.7 92 90
243 09/13/05 Lot 3;North 325 2 0 120.6 9.0 93 90
244 09/13/05 Lot 3; North 322 2 0 117.1 8.4 90 90
245 09/13/05 Lot 328 2 0 117.5 8.7 90 90
246 09/14/05 Lot 3; North 331 2 0 119.7 9.2 92 90
247 09/14/05 Lot 335 2 0 121.9 8.7 94 90
248 09/14/05 Lot 337 2 0 118.9 8.9 91 90
249 09/14/05 Lot 3; North 338 2 0 117.3 8.0 90 90
250 09/14/05 Lot 340 2 0 117.9 8.6 91 90
251 09/15/05 Lot 352 2 0 117.2 11.0 90 90
252 09/15/05 Lot 354 2 0 120.9 10.4 93 90
253 09/15/05 Lot 355 2 0 121.9 9.0 94 90
254 09/15/05 Lot 357 2
-.
0 117.6 9.3 90 90
255 09/16/05 Lot 313 2 0 121.4 8.4 93 90
256 09/16/05 Lot 318 2 0 119.6 8.9 92 90
257 09/16/05 Lot 315 2 0 118.4 9.2 91 90
258 09/16/05 Lot 316 2 0 118.8 8.8 91 90
259 09/19/05 Lot 3; North 345 5 0 122.0 8.6 90 90
260 09/19/05 Lot 3; North 347 5 0 125.4 8.0 93 90
261 09/19/05 Lot 3; North 348 2 0 119.4 8.5 92 90
262 09/19/05 Lot 351 2 0 118.1 9.0 91 90
263 09/19/05 Lot 3; North 352 5 0 121.6 8.1 90 90
ST 264 09/20/05 Lot 3 300 5 0 119.2 9.0 88 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(ft's
' /
Cue
No.
Plus
3/4
Rock
(0/\ 0/
Field
Dry
Dens.
I f (Pc f)
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(9t\ 0,
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(C/\ Oj
Reqd.
Rel.
Comp.
(0Z
ST 264A 09/26/05 Lot 300 5 0 122.0 7.5 90 90
265 09/20/05 Lot 3 352 5 0 121.6 8.0 90 90
266 09/20/05 Lot 3; North 354 5 0 123.9 7.8 92 90
267 09/20/05 Lot 3; North 355 5 0 122.4 8.2 91 90
268 09/21105 Lot 3; North 358 5 0 121.7 ..0 90 90
269 09/21105 Lot 3;North 360 5 0 121.6 7.6 90 90
270 09/21/05 Lot 3; North 364 5 0 124.7 7.5 92 90
271 09/21/05 Lot 3; North 267 5 0 121.6 7.0 90 90
272 09/22/05 Lot 6 340 5 0 121.6 7.9 90 90
273 09/22/05 Lot 6
.
343
. 5 0 125.48.2 .93 90
274 09/22/05 Lot 8 344 2 0 118.0 8.5 91 90
275 09/22/05 Lot 8 346 2 0 117.6 9.0 90 90
276 09/22/05 Lot 6 344 5 0 121.9 7.9 90 90
277 09/22/05 Lot 349 5 0 127.1 7.6 94 90
278 09/22/05 Lot 8 346 2 0 117.5 9.0 90 90
279 09/22/05 Lot 8 347 2 0 119.4 8.2 92 90
280 09/23/05 Lot 6 346 5 0 125.4 7.0 93 90
281 09/23/05 Lot 349 5 0 123.2 8.2 91 90
282 09/23/05 Lot 346 2 0 117.2 9.1 90 90
283 09/23/05 Lot 8 349 2 0 122.0 8.7, 94 90
284 09/23/05 Lot 8 320 2 0 120.6 9.0 93 90
285 09/23/05 Lot , 325 2 0 117.1 8.5 90 90
286 09/23/05 Lot 6 344 2 0 117.6 9.3 90 90
287 09/23/05 Lot 6 346 2 0 120.2 9.0 92 90
288 09/26/05 Lot 360 2 0 114.5 4.5 88 90
288A 09/26/05 Lot 360 2 0 119.7 8.9 92 90
289 09/26/05 Lot 359 2 0 113.4 4.9 87 90
289 A 09/26/05 Lot 6 359 2 0 117.2 8.7 90 90
ST 290 09/26/05 Lot 305 5 0 122.1 7.5 90 90
ST 291 09/26/05 Lot
- -
285 5 0 123.3 8.0 91 90
ST 292 09/26/05 Lot 3 295 5 0 121.6 7.9 90 90
293 09/26/05 Lot 8 . 340 3 0 116.8 9.0 91 90
294 09/26/05 Lot 336 3 0 121.1 8.9 95 90
295 09/27/05 Lot 319 5 0 127.3 8.5 94 90
296 09/27/05 Lot3 315 5 0 122.9 8.7 91 90
297 09/27/05 Lot 324 5 0 121.6 7.5 90 90
.298 09/27/05 Lot 329 5 0 122.0 7.6 90 90
299 09/27/05 Lot 350 2 0 119.3 9.4 92 90
300 09/27/05 Lot 346 2 0 121.6 8.7 93 90
301 . 09/28/05 Lot 6 350 2 0 120.7 9.4 93 90
302 09/28/05 Lot 353 2 0 117.1 8.5 90 90
303 09/28/05 Lot 354 2 0 118.1 8.9 91 90
304 09/29/05 Lot 358 2 0 117.5 8.5 90 90
305 09/29/05 Lot 360 2 0 119.3 9.0 92 90
306 09/29/05 Lot 13 355 2 0 117.6 9.2 90 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth Curve
No.
Plus
3/4"
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(PcO
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
Req'd.
Rel.
Comp.
307 09/29/05 Lot 8; North 355 2 0 117.1 9.0 90 90
308 09/29/05 Lot 8 328 2 0 122.0 8.4 94 90
309 09/29/05 Lot 330 2 0 118.5 8.9 91 90
310 09/30/05 Lot 367 2 0 118.1 8.7 91 90
311 09/30/05 Lot 368 2 0 117.3 8.5 90 90
312 09/30/05 Lot 8; North 375 2 0 122.4 8.3 94 90
313 09/30/05 Lot 8; North 378 2 0 117.2 9.3 90 0
314 09/30/05 Lot 13 380 2 0 119.3 8.5 92 90
315 09/30/05 Lot 13 375 2 0 117.6 9.1. 90 90
316 09/30/05 Lot 13 373 2 0 118.5 8.8 91 90
317 10/03/05 Lot 8; North 365 2 0 120.0 9.0 92 90
318 10/03/05 Lot 8; North 370 2 0 117.6 8.4 90 90
319 10/03/05 Lot 8; North 375 2 0 117.2 9.5 90 90
320 10/03/05 Lot 8; North 377 2 0 118.8 11.2 91 90
321 10/03/05 Lot 13 376 2 0 123.3 9.4 95 90
-
ST 322 10/04/05 Lot 3; North 345 5 0 121.7 8.0 90 90
ST 323 10/04/05 Lot 3; North 355 5 0 124.2 7.5 92 90
ST 324 10/04/05 Lot 3;North 355 5 0 121.6 7.0 90 90
ST 325 10/04/05 Lot 3; North 365 5 0 122.2 7.1 90 90
326 10/04/05 Lot 13 380 2 0 118.0 8.4 91 90
327 10/04/05 Lot 8; North 380 2 0 122.3 8.8 94 90
328 10/04/05 Lot 13 383 2 0 119.8 9.4 92 90
329 10/05/05 Lot 8; North 385 2 0 120.7 9.1 93 90
330 10/05/05 Lot 13 383 2 0 117.1 8.4 90 90
331 10/05/05 Lot 8; North 360 2 0 117.9 8.5 91 90
332 10/05/05 Whiptail Loop 13+50 305 2 0 113.4 4.0 87 90
332A 10/05/05 Whiptail Loop 13+50 305 2 0 117.1 8.4 90 90
333 10/05/05 Whiptail Loop 11+50 290 2 0 114.7 4.6 88 90
333 A 10/05/05 Whiptail Loop 11+50 290 2 0 117.4 8.7 90 90
33'. 10/06/05 Whiptail Loop 57+00 389 2 0 120.7 8.5 93 90
335 10/06/05 Whiptail Loop 58+00 381 2 0 117.2 8.7 90 90
336 10/06/05 Lot 13 365 2 0 117.9 8.4 91 90
337 10/06/05 Lot 13 370 2 0 117.1 8.6 90 90
338 10/06/05 Lot 8 350 2 0 123.9 9.3 95 90
339 10/06/05 Lot 325 2 0 118.1 9.0 91 90
340 10/07/05 Lot 8; North 352 2 0 123.3 9.1 95 90
341 10/07/05 Lot 8; North 354 2 0 119.8 8.8 92 90
342 10/07/05 Lot 330 2 0 117.6 9.0 90 90
343 10/07/05 Lot 8 330 2 0 120.2 8.5 92 90
344 10/07/05 Lot 8 388 2 0 122.4 8.7 94 90
343 10/07/05 Lot 13 364 2 0 117.1 8.1 90 90
345 10/07/05 Lot 13 368 2 0 121.1 8.4 93 90
347 10/07/05 Lot 8; North 370 2 0 117.6 8.8 90 90
348 10/07/05 Lot 330 2 0 118.4 8.7 91 90
349 10/10/05 Lot 8; North 368 2 0 117.2 8.6 90 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd.
or 314" Dry Moist. Re!. Re!.
Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location t) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
350 10/10/05 Lot 13 370 2 0 122.7 9.2 94 90
351 10/10/05 Lot 8; North 372 2 0 117.5 8.2 90 90
352 10/10/05 Lot 334 2 0 120.0 8.5 92 90
353 10/10/05 Lot 338 2 0 117.5 8.4 90 90
354 10/10/05 Lot 336 2 0 121.8 8.9 94 90
355 10/10/05 Lot 8. 332 2 0 117.2 9.0 90 90
356 10/11/05 Lot 8; North 385 2 0 120.0 9.0 92 90
357 10/11/05 Lot 8; North 376 2 0 118.1 8.8 91 90
358 10/11/05 Lot 8; North 387 2 0 117.6 8.5 90 90
359 10/11/05 Lot 8 338 2 0 120.7 8.8 93 90
360 10/11/05 Lot 333 2 0 118.4 8.2 91 90
361 10/12/05 Lot 358 2 Or 117.1 8.0 90 90
362 10/12/05 Lot 360 2 0 119.4 8.7 92 90
363 10/12/05 Lot 362 2 0 123.6 8.5 95 90
364 10/12/05 Lot 4 355 2 0 120.3 8.7 92 90
365 10/12/05 Lot 362 2 0 117.1 9.0 90 90
366 10/13/05 Lot 13 393 2 0 118.0 8.4 91 90
367 10/13/05 Lot 13 385 2 0 117.5 8.2 90 90
368 10/13/05 Lot 13 395 2 0 118.4 8.6 91 90
369 10/13/05 Lot 7 360 2 0 120.7 9.0 93 90
370 10/14/05 Lot 13 396 2 0 119.9 8.5 92 90
371 10/14/05 Lot 13 380 2 0 123.7 9.3 95 90
372 10/14/05 Lot 8; North 375 2 0 117.2 9.0 90 90
373 10/14105 Lot 363 2 0 120.7 8.9 93 90
374 10/17/05 Lot 329 2 0 117.5 9.0 90 90
375 10/17/05 Lot 332 2 0 117.6 9.2 90 90
376 10/17/05 Lot 8; North 390 2 0 123.9 8.7 95 90
377 10/17/05 Lot 380 2 0 120.7 8.8 93 90
378 10/18/05 Lot 335 2 0 120.6 8.9 93 90
379 10/18/05 Slope Between Lots 6/7 366 2 0 118.0 9.4 91 90
380 10/18/05 SlopeBetween Lots 6/7 382 2 0 123.1 8.9 95 90
381 10/18/05 Lot 344 2 0 121.8 9.6 94 90
382 10/18/05 Lot 345 2 0 117.1 10.4 90 90
383 10/18/05 Lot 340 2 0 117.5 9.9 90 90
384 10/18/05 Lot 375 2 0 120.0 10.2 92 90
385 10/21/05 Lot 343 2 0 128.6 4.7 99 90
385A 10/21/05 Lot 343 2 0 127.2 11.1 98 90
386 10/21/05 Lot 345 2 0 127.4 3.8 98 90
386A 10/21/05 Lot 345 2 0 125.7 12.4 97 90
387 10/21/05 Lot 345 2 0 122.9 6.9 94 90
387A 10/21/05 Lot 345 2 0 119.2 11.2 92 90
388 10/21/05 Lot 243 4 0 113.2 162 91 90
389 10/21105 Lot 9. 246 4 0 115.2 15.4 93 90
390 10/24/05 Lot 238 4 0 112.2 17.9 91 90
391 10/24/05 Lot 240 4 0 114.7 18.2 93 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A - August 30, 2006
Test No. Date
392 10/24/05 Lot 9
393 10/25/05 Lot 9
394 10/25/05 Lot 9
395 10/27/05 Lot 9
396 10/27/05 Lot 9
ST 397 10/31/05 Lot 6
ST 398 10/31/05 Lot
ST 399 10/31/05 Lot
ST 400 10/31/05 Lot 6
ST 401 10/31/05 Lot6
ST 402 10/31/05 Lot 6
ST 403 10/31/05 Lot
ST 404 10/31/05 Lot
ST 405 10/31/05 Lot
ST 406 10/31/05 Lot
ST 407 10/31/05 Lot
ST 408 10/31/05 Lot
FG 409 10/31/05 Lot
FG 410 10/31/05 Lot
FG 411 10/31/05 Lot
FG 412
--------------------------------------------------
10/31/05 Lot
413 11/03/05 Lot
414 11/03/05 Lot 2
415 11104/05 Lot
416 11/04/05 Lot
417 11/04/05 Lot 8;Nord
418 11/04/05 Lot 8;Nord
ST 419 11/14/05 Lot 13;Easl
ST 420 11/14/05 Lot 13; Easi
ST 421 11/14/05 Lot 8; Nord
ST 422 11/14/05 Lot 13;Easi
ST 423 11/14/05 Lot 8; Nord
ST 424 11/14/05 Lot 13;Easi
ST 425 11/14105 Lot 8;Nord
426 11/15/05 Lot
427 11/15/05 Lot
428 11/15/05 Lot
429 11/16/05 Lot
430 11/16/05 Lot
431 11/17/05 Lot7
432 11/17/05 Lot7
433 11/18/05 Lot7
434 11/18/05 Lot7
435 11/21/05 Lot
436 11/21/05 Lot 2
241 4 0
250 4 0
250 4 0
253 4 0
255 4 0
350 2 0
350 2 0
350 2 0
345 2 0
345 2 0 ----------------------------------------
350 2 0
345 2 0
345 .2 0
350 2 0
355 2 0 ----------------------------------------
325 2 0
325 2 0
317 2 0
317 2 0
320 2 0
324
-----------------------------
2 0
257 9 0
257 9 0
354 2 0
351 2 0 -----------------------------------------
394 2 0
397 2 0
390 3 0
392 3 0
386 2 0 -----------------------------------------
395 3 0
387 3 0
395 3 0
386 3 0
348 9 0
346 9 0
350 .9 0
349 9 0
348 9 0
383 3 0
389 2 0
386 2 0
389 2 0
256 13 0
258 13 0
113.9 18.6 92 90
112.9 18.0 91 90
114.2 17.4 92 90
115.0 16.5 93 90
112.9 17.2 91 90
119.4 6.8
---------------------------------------------------
92 90
119.1 6.7 92 90
119.8 6.7 92 90
119.5 6.9 92 90
120.4 7.0 93 90
121.8 5.6 94 90
120.3 8.4 92 90
117.6 7.9 90 90
118.0 8.7 91 90
117.0 8.5 90 90
116.6 7.1 .
---------------------------------------------------
90 90
117.5 7.3 90 90
120.3 7.4 92 90
121.1 6.8 93 90
120.1 7.2 92 90
120.3 8.0
----------------------------------------------------
92 90
104.8 18.4 93 90
101.7 19.0 90 90
116.5 8.2 90 90
117.2 9.3 90 90
119.7 8.7
----------------------------------------------------
92 90
118.7 7.7 91 90
117.2 7.1 92 90
115.5 7.5 90 90
118.7 8.1 91 90
116.5 7.8 91 90
115.0 7.5 90 90
115.1 7.8 90 90
115.9 7.4 91 90
104.0 18.5 92 90
101.7 20.2 90 90
102.1 22.1 90 90
104.8 19.4 93 90
103.0 20.1 91 90
115.0 8.6 90 90
122.9 8.6 94 90
123.5 8.8 95 90
119.9 8.1 92 90
113.2 14.1 93 90
111.0 12.7 91 90
Location
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Reqd.
or 3/4' Dry Moist. Rel. Rd.
Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Camp. Comp.
(ft) No. (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (%)
TABLES
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
('t)
Curve
No.
Plus
3/4"
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pcO
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
Reqd.
Rel.
Comp.
(%)
437 11/30/05 Lot 397 18 0 104.0 19.5 90 90
438 12/01/05 Lot 335 14 0 100.8 23.3 94 90
439 12/01/05 Lot 8 337 14 0 97.8 22.6 91 90
440 12/01/05 Lot 8 352 14 0 98.5 20.0 92 90
441 12/01/05 Lot 340 15 0 101.0 21.7 90 90
442 12109/05 Lot 8 343 2 0 120.0 6.8 92 90
443 12/09/05 Lot 8 345 2 0 117.1 7.9 90 90
444 12/09/05 Lot 8 347 2 0 119.3 8.4 92 90
445 12/09/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 24-90 256 20 0 121.4 8.5 91 90
446 12/09/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 1+90 25-20 0 122.1 7.9 92 90
-
447 12/09/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 2+50 260 16 0 110.8 16.2 93 90
448 12/12105 Lot 7;North 406 2 0 117.1 8.5 90 90
449 12/12/05 Lot 7;North 425 2 0 119.3 7.8 92 90
450 12/12/05 Lot 7; North 415 2 0 118.4 7.5 91 90
451 12/12/05 Lot 14 431 2 0 117.2 7.9 90 90
452 12/13/05 Slope Between Lots 6/7 382 2 0 120.0 6.8 92 90
453 12/13/05 Lot 378 2 0 117.1 7.3 90 90
454 12/13/05 Slope Between Lots 6/7 390 2 0 117.5 7.5 90 90
455 12/13/05 Lot 256 13 0 114.3 15.6 94 90
456 12/13/05 S1opeBetween Lots 6/7 394 2 0 117.9 7.0 91 90
457 12/14/05 Lot 7; North 436 2 0 117.5 7.5 90 90
458 12/14/05 Lot 7; North 442 2 0 118.5 8.0 91 90
459 12/14/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 3+95 258 16 0 111.2 13.1 93 90
460 12/14/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+80 257 16 0 110.5 12.8 93 90
461 12/14/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+30 262 16 0 107.9 14.9 90 90
462 12/15/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 6+70 262 16 0 107.6 15.8 90 90
463 12/15/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 7+25 265 16 0 112.5 16.1 94 90
464 12115/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 5+70 267 16 0 110.1 16.5 92 90
465 12/15/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 3+25 266 21 0 116.0 15.2 93 90
466 12/15/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+35 269 21 0 112.5 13.8 90 90
467 12/15/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 5+00 275 21 0 112.9 14.0 90 90
468 12/16/05 Lot 351 3 0 116.6 7.5 91 90
469 12/16/05 Lot 352 3 0 117.4 8.6 92 90
470 12116/05 Whiptail Loop 18+00 337 2 0 120.6 7.8 93 90
471 12/16/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 8+20 262 21 0 112.5 12.2 90 90
472 12/16/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 7+90 266 21 0 114.5 11.8 92 90
473 12/19/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 3+50 271 21 0 115.9 14.5 93 90
474 12/19/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+55 278 21 0 113:7 12.2 91 90
475 12/19/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 6+75 270 21 0 112.6 11.4 90 90
476 12/19/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+10 28-16 0 107.8 16.0 90 90
477 12/19/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 6+40 282 21 0 115.8 16.2 93 90
478 12/20/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+65 286 21 0 113.7 15.1 91 90
479 12/20/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 3+75 292 21 0 118.9 16.2 95 90
480 12/20/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 4+30 297 21 0 114.5 13.0 92 90
481 12/20/05 Lot 352 3 0 116.0 12.0 91 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Req'd
or 3/4' Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock Dens Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No Date Location No. (%) (pcO (%) (%) (%)
482 12/20/05 Lot 354 3 0 115.2 9.1 90 90
483 12120105 Lot 2; Stability Fill 9+30 258 20 0 122.5 8.1 92 90
484 12/20105 Lot 2; Stability Fill 9+70 262 20 0 120.9 6.9 91 90
485 12/21/05 Lot 14 448 3 0 115.3 10.1 90 90
486 12/21/05 Lot 14 452 3 0 118.8 7.5 93 90
487 12/21/05 Lot 14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
455 3 0 116.5 8.0 91 90
488 12/22/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 8+85 268 21 0 116.2 11.5 93 90
489 12/22/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 8+20 275 21 0 112.5 15.6 90 90
490 12/22/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 9+60 275 21 0 113.8 14.2 91 90
491 12/22/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 8+80 279 21 0 118.7 13.7 95 90
492 12/22/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 5+65
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
295 21 0 112.5 12.9 90 90
ST 493 12/23/05 Lot 8; East 350 5 0 124.9 7.1 92 90
ST 494 12/23/05 Lot 8; South 342 2 0 116.6 7.5 90 90
ST 495 12/23/05 Lot 8; South 345 2 0 118.5 8.2 91 90
496 12/23/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill ' 263 15 - 0 101:318.9 9-90
497 12/23/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 265 15 0 102.9 20.2 92 90
498 12/27/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 263 15 0 105.7 20.4 94 90
499 12/27/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 267 15 0 102.3 22.1 91 90
500 12/29/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 261 15 0 103.2 18.2 92 90
501 12/29/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 27321 0 113.7 13.5 91 90
ST 502 12/30/05 Lot 8; South 341 2 0 116.9 7.3 90 90
ST 503 12/30/05 Lot 8; South 341 2 0 117.1 9.0 90 90
ST 504 12/30/05 Lot 8; South 344 2 0 117.5 7.5 90 90
ST 505 12/30/05 Lot 8; South 342 20 0 121.9 7.0 92 90
ST 506 12/30/05 Lot 4; South 353 5 0 121.1 6.0 90 90
ST 507 12/30/05 Lot 4; West 355 2 0 116.7 6.6 90 90
508 12/30/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 265 18 0 107.1 17.5 93 90
509 12/30/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 271 20 0 119.8 9.7 90 90
510 12/30/05 Lot 2; Stability Fill 278 20 0 122.7 9.9 92 90
511 01/06/06 Lot 351 2 0 118.5 10.2 91 90
512 01/06/06 Lot 354 2 0 117.5 8.7 90 90
513 01/10/06 Lot 7 397 2 0 122.0 8.9 94 90
514 01/10/06 Lot7 395 2 0 118.3 7.5 91 90
515 01/10/06 Lot7 375 2 0 117.1 9.2 90 90
516
-
01/10/06 Lot 7; Stability Fill 269 14 0 98.6 18.0 92 90
517 01/11/06 Lot7 398 2 0 118.1 10.0 91 90
518 01/11/06 Lot7 399 2 0 117.3 9.0 90 90
519 01/12/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 265 12 0 119.9 10.4 93 90
520 01/12/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 276 21 0 117.4 11.5 94 90
52101/12/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 280 21 0 113.7 15.0 91 90
522 01/13/06 Lot7 400 2 0 120.7 9.9 93 90
523 01/13/06 Lot7 400 2 0 119.3 10.0 92 90
524 01/16/06 Lot7 401 2 0 120.1 9.5 92 90
525 01/16/06 Lot7 399 2 0 117.6 8.9 90 90
526 01/16/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 271 24 0 112.3 13.1 91 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Elev. Plus Field Field Field Reqd.
or 3/4 Dry Moist. Rel. Rel.
Depth Curve Rock Dens. Cont. Comp. Comp.
Test No. Date Location (ft)No. (%) (pet) (%) (%) (%)
527 01/16/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 274 24 0 113.1 12.8 91 90
528 01/17/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 275 24 0 111.7 12.2 90 90
529 01/17/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 285 24 0 112.1 10.9 90 90
530 01/17/06 Lot 383 2 0 119.7 9.0 92 90
531 01/17/06 Lot 389 2 --118.7 8.5 9190
ST 532 01/18/06 Lot 7; North 439 2 0 116.7 8.6 90 90
ST 533 01/18/06 Lot 7; North 441 5 0 123.0 6.5 91 90
ST 534 01/18/06 Lot 7; North 445 2 0 118.0 7.5 91 90
535 01/18/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 266 18 0 107.2 20.1 93 90
536 01/18/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 277 24 -113.8 12.2 9290
537 01/19/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 283 24 0 112.3 11.3 91 90
538 01/19/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 290 24 0 115.3 10.9 93 90
539 01/23/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 290 24 0 114.3 12.4 92 90
540 01/23/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 315 24 0 116.4 13.3 94 90
541 01/25/06 Lot 349 2 0 125.1 8.0 96 90
542 01/25/06 Lot 350 2 0 118.1 9.9 91 90
543 01/31/06 Lot 352 2 0 120.1 8.5 92 90
544 01/31/06 Lot 353 2 0 123.9 8.7 95 90
FG 545 02/01/06 Lot 8 356 2 0 121.3 8.7 93 90
FG 546 02/01/06 Lot 8 352 2 0 123.4 8.5 95 90
FG 547 02/01/06 Lot 8 348 2 0 124.3 8.6 96 90
FG 548 02/01/06 Lot 8 350 2 0 123.8 8.5 95 90
FG 549 02/01/06 Lot 8 348 2 0 123.6 8.7 95 90
FG 550 02/01/06 Lot 7 406 1 0 120.5 8.4 93 90
FG 551 02/01/06 Lot 7 400 1 0 122.3 8.6 95 90
FG 552 02/01/06 Lot 402 1 0 121.7 8.7 94 90
ST 553 02/01/06 Lot 7; Southwest 385 1 0 115.9 11.1 90 90
ST 554 02/01/06 Lot 7; Southwest 395 1 0 117.6 10.5 91 90
ST 555 02/01/06 Lot 7; Southwest 400 1 0 116.0 10.9 90 90
556 02/02/06 Lot 6 356 2 0 117.2 9.9 90 90
557 02/02/06 Lot 354 2 0 121.0 10.2 93 90
FG 558 02/06/06 Lot 364 2 0 119.1 8.7 92 90
FG 559 02/06/06 Lot 340 2 0 121.3 7.8 93 90
FG 560 02/06/06 Lot 5 340 2 0 120.7 8.1 93 90
FG. 561 02/06/06 Lot 343 2 0 119.2 8.3 92 90
562 03/02/06 Lot 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
255 13 0 109.8 12.5 90 90
563 03/02/06 Lot! 256 13 0 111.3 13.0 91 90
564 03/06/06 Lot 1 250 15 0 101.3 20.1 90 90
565 03/06/06 Loll 258 15 0 103.4 22.1 92 90
566 03/06/06 Lot 1 252 15 0 103.7 19.8 92 90
567 03/06/06 Lot 1 255 15 0 101.9 21.7 91 90
568 03/07/06 Lot 1 251 15 0 103.3 22.0 92 90
569 03/16/06 Lot 1 255 19 0 103.0 10.4 88 90
569A 03/16/06 Lot! 255 19 0 105.3 14.8 90 90
570 03/16/06 Lot 252 19 0 104.3 11.1 89 90
Project No 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test No. Date Location
Elev.
or
Depth
(it) Curve
No.
Plus
314'
Rock
(%)
Field
Dry
Dens.
(pci)
Field
Moist.
Cont.
(%)
Field
Rd.
Comp.
(%)
Req'd.
Re!.
Comp.
(%)
570A 03/16/06 Loll 252 19 0 105.6 14.9 90 90
571 03/27/06 Lot 258 13 0 110.7 13.3 91 90
572 03/27/06 Lot 262 13 0 113.2 12.7 93 90
573 03/28/06 Lot 1 253 12 0 116.1 11,8 90 90
574 03/28/06 Lot 1 254 12 0 121.5 12.7 94 90
575 03/28/06 Lot 1 255 12 0 119.5 10.1 93 90
576 04/03/06 Lot 1 255 19 0 105.7 16.9 90 90
577 04103/06 Lot 1 258 19 0 106.5 15.9 91 90
578 04/11/06 Lot 1 252 19 0 108.6 16.8 93 90
579 04/11/06 Lot 1 252 1.9 0 105.7 17.4 90 90
ST 580 04/14/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 285 21 0 115.2 10.8 92 90
ST 581 04/14/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 285 21 0 112.8 12.3 90 90
ST 582 04/20/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 292 19 0 107.9 14.9 92 90
ST 583 04/20/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 283 19 0 111.0 14.6 95 90
ST 584 04/20/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 285 19 0 106.5 14.7 91 90
ST 585 04/20/06 Lot 2; Stability Fill 285 19 0 105.4 14.5 90 90
586 04/21/06 Lot 256 16 0 107.8 15.6 90 90
587 04/21/06 Lot 259 16 0 109.8 16.0 92 90
FG 588 04/26/06 Lot 258 13 0 110.8 12.7 91 90
FG 589 04/26/06 Lot 260 13 0 110.3 13.1 90 90
FG 590 04/26/06 Lot 9 262 13 0 109.9 13.5 90 90
ST 591 04/26/06 Lot 253 13 0 109.8 15.5 90 90
ST 592 04/26/06 Lot 250 13 0 111.0 14.8 91 90
593 04/28/06 Lot 6 364 22 0 113.5 16.5 93 90
594 04/28/06 Lot 363 22 0 109.8 15.4 90 90
595 05/03/06 Lot 360 22 0 116.2 11.8 95 90
596 05/03/06 Lot 360 22 0 113.1 12.7 93 90
597 06/13/06 Lot 6 357 32 0 119.5 4.5 89 90
597 A 06/13/06 Lot 6 357 32 0 122.2 7.0 91 90
598 06/13/06 Lot 357 32 0 118.8 5.5 89 90
598 A 06/13/06 Lot 6 357 32 0 120.6 7.2 90 90
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE I
EXPLANATION OF CODED TERMS
- TEST SUFFIX
A, B, C, . . . : Retest of previous density test failure, following moisture conditioning and/or recompaction.
Fill in area of density test failure was removed and replaced with properly compacted fill soil.
- PREFIX CODE DESIGNATION FOR TEST NUMBERS
DTN - DUPLICATE TEST NUMBER FG - FINISH GRADE
ST - SLOPE TEST
- CURVE NO.
Corresponds to curve numbers listed in the summary of laboratory maximum dry density and optimum
moisture content test results table for selected fill soil samples encountered during testing and observation.
- ROCK CORRECTION
For density tests with rock percentage greater than zero, laboratory maximum dry density and optimum
moisture content were adjusted for rock content. For tests with rock content equal to zero, laboratory
maximum dry density and optimum moisture content values are unadjusted.
- TYPE OF TEST
SC: Sand Cone Test (ASTM D1556)
NU: Nuclear Density Test (ASTM D2922)
OT: Other
- ELEVATION/DEPTH
Test elevations/depths have been rounded to the nearest whole foot.
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MA)(IMUM DRY DENSITY AND
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 1557-02
Proctor Maximum Optimum
Curve No. Source and Description Dry Density Moisture Content
(pet) (%)
1 Dark brown, Silty, fine SAND 129.2 8.5
2 Olive brown, Silty, fine to coarse SAND
with trace gravel 130.1 8.6
3 Very dark brown, Clayey, fine to coarse 128.0 8.9 SAND with trace gravel
4 Very dark brown, Clayey, fine to medium 123.9 1.0 SAND, with trace gravel
5 Dark reddish brown, Clayey, fine to coarse 135.1 7.4 SAND with trace gravel
Light olive, fine to medium, Sandy SILT 112.9 17.3 with little clay
12 Olive gray, Silty, fine to medium SAND 128.9 9.2
13 Light yellowish brown, Silty, fine to coarse 122.0 11.8 SAND with silt
14 Light yellowish brown, Silty CLAY/ 107.5 17.8 Clayey SILT
15 Olive green, Silty CLAY 112.2 17.8
16 Light yejiowish brown, Clayey, fine to 119.4 12.6 coarse SAND
18 Light brown, fine, Sandy SILT 115.5 15.0
19 Dark brown, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND 117.0 14.7
with trace gravel
20 Very dark reddish brown, Silty, fine to 133.1 7.6 medium SAND
21 Light brown, fine to coarse, Clayey, SAND 124.9 11.4
with trace gravel
22 Brown, Clayey, fine to medium SAND 122.0 11.4
24 Olive brown, Clayey, fine to coarse SAND 124.0 11.3 with trace silt
32 Dark yellowish brown, Silty, fine to coarse 134.0 7.3 SAND with trace gravel and clay
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE III
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 4829-03
Sample No.
(Lot No.)
Moisture Content Dry Density
(pci)
Expansion
Index Before Test (%) After Test (%)
El-i (Lot 8) 7.7 13.9 118.8 0
EI-2 (Lot 8) 9.1 13.7 113.2 0
EI-3 (Lot 8) 8.1 14.9 118.4 0
El-4 (Lot 8) 8.2 13.5 118.2 0
EI-5 (Lot 5) 8.9 14.8 113.2 0
EI-6 (Lot 5) 8.8 14.7 113.2 0
EI-7 (Lot 5) 8.8 14.1 113.2 0
El-8 (Lot 7) 8.5 15.6 117.9 0
EI-9 (Lot 7) 8.9 14.2 113.0 0
EI-10 (Lot 7) 8.2 13.1 117.9 0
El- 11 (Lot 4) 8.3 14.3 117.8 0
El- 12 (Lot 4) 8.4 13.9 113.8 0
El- 13 (Lot 4) 8.4 15.8 117.6 2
EI-14 (Lot 3) 9.0 16.5 113.0 1
El-15 (Lot 3) 9.3 14.9 113.9 2
EI-16 (Lot 3) 8.4 14.2 117.8 1
TABLE IV
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
ASTM 03080-03
Sample
No.
Dry Density
(pcf)
Moisture Content
(%)
Unit Cohesion
(psi)
Angle of Shear
Resistance (degrees)
5 121.5 7.4 1015 48
9 102.6 17.1 250 18
12 116.2 9.1 220 30
13 .111.3 11.9 440 39
14 99.3 16.3 230 34
15 100.3 18.5 400 19
16 108.3 12.7 360 33
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006
TABLE IV (Continued)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
ASTM D 3080-03
Sample
No.
Dry Density
(pet)
Moisture Content
(%)
Unit Cohesion
(pst)
Angle of Shear
Resistance (degrees)
.18 104.2 14.7 570 28
19 105.8 14.1 580 33
.20 120.9 6.6 380 39
21 112.6 11.3 110 34
.24 112.0 10.7 500 37
Samples were remolded to approximately 90 percent of maximum dry density at near optimum moisture content.
TABLE V
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY WATER-SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST RESULTS
CALIFORNIA TEST NO. 417
Sample No. (Lot No.) Water-Soluble Sulfate (%) Sulfate Exposure
El-i (Lot 8) 0.020 Negligible
EI-2 (Lot 8) 0.111 AMR
EI-3 (Lot 8) 0.012 Negligible
EI4 (Lot 8) 0.024 Negligible
EI-5 (Lot 5) 0.012 Negligible
EI-6 (Lot 5) 0.017 Negligible
El-7 (Lot 5) 0.047 Negligible
El-8 (Lot 5) 0.003 Negligible
EI-9 (Lot 5) 0.009 Negligible
El-10 (Lot 5) 0.007 Negligible
LI-il (Lot 4) 0.004 Negligible
EI-12 (Lot 4) 0.007 Negligible
EI-13 (Lot 4) 0.011 Negligible
EI-14 (Lot 3) 0.002 Negligible
EI-15 (Lot 3) 0.008 Negligible
El- 16 (Lot 3) 0.004 Negligible
Project No. 06442-32-04A August 30, 2006